Lofland Park Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

62.6% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 222 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 47.1% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 121 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.33 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 56% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 19% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 110 beds and averages 101.6 residents a day — about 92% occupied, or roughly 8 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.84 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 1.25 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.14 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.51 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.97 on weekdays — 12% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.42 to 0.85 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 30% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

20 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 10 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · D2026-06-30 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interviews, record review and review of other facility records, it was determined that for one (R25) of eleven residents reviewed for accidents, the facility failed to provide an accident-free environment. R25 fell from a Hoyer lift onto the floor during a transfer due to improper use of the lift by two staff members. The Hoyer lift fell on R25's right knee. R25 complained of pain and was sent to the hospital for further evaluation and treatment. Due to the facility's corrective measures following this incident, this deficiency is being cited as past non-compliance with a corrected date of 1/9/26, which was verified through interviews and review of facility records. Findings include:10/22/25 - R25 was admitted to the facility.1/8/26 6:30 PM - A review of a facility incident report submitted to the Division documented R25 fell from the Hoyer lift at this time.1/8/26 9:38 PM - A review of a facility incident report to the Division documented CNA notified nursing that [R25] had fallen from the Hoyer. Further review of the report indicated R25 complained of feeling a snap in…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Potential for harm · D2025-06-13 · tag F0552 — isolated
  Ensure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, it was determined that for one (R79) out of five residents sampled for medication review, the facility failed to discuss the risk and benefits of proposed care. Findings include: Review of R79's clinical record revealed: 9/12/24 - R79 was admitted to the facility. 9/18/24 - An admission MDS documented R79 was a BIMS of 6 indicating severe cognitive impairment. 2/13/25 - A physician's order was written for buspirone (anti-anxiety) 5 mg give one tablet by mouth every morning and and at bedtime for anxiety. 3/3/25 - A physician's order was written for lorazepam (anti-anxiety) 0.5 mg give one tablet by mouth every six hours for generalized anxiety disorder for 14 days. 3/9/25 - A physician's order was written for haloperidol (anti-psychotic) 5 mg/mL inject 5 mg/mL intramuscularly every four hours as needed for agitation. 6/11/25 1:41 PM - During an interview, E11 (RN) stated the expectation is to review each new medication (psychotropic) risk versus benefits with the resident if cognitively intact or with the resident's representative. E11 also…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-06-13 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolated
  Prevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, it was determined that for one (R79) out of five residents sampled for medication review, the facility failed to limit a PRN psychotropic medication to 14 days. Findings include: Review of R79's clinical record revealed: 9/12/24 - R79 was admitted to the facility. 3/6/25 - A quarterly MDS assessment documented that R79 was a BIMS of 9 indicating that R79 was moderate cognitively impaired. 3/9/25 - A physician's order was written for haloperidol (anti-psychotic) 5 mg/mL inject 5 mg/mL intramuscularly every four hours as needed for agitation with an indefinite stop date. 3/31/25 - A physician's order was written for lorazepam (anti-anxiety) 0.5 mg give one tablet by mouth every six hours as needed for generalized anxiety disorder for 180 days. 6/12/25 10:19 AM - During an interview, E6 (RN) stated the expectation for PRN medications have a 14 day stop date so the provider can evaluate resident for usage of the medication. E6 confirmed that the lorazepam and haldol did not have the 14 day stop date. E6 also confirmed the physician's progress note…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-06-13 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
  Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review it was determined that for two (R9 and R58) out of two residents reviewed for bowel and bladder, the facility failed to initiate antibiotic therapy for signs and symptoms of a UTI. For R9 with a urinary catheter who met criteria of a positive urine culture and for R58 without a urinary catheter who met criteria of a positive urine culture. Findings include: 1. Review of R9's clinical record revealed: 10/4/18 - R9 admitted to the facility with diagnoses including, but not limited to, thoracic spinal cord injury. 2/25/25 - An annual MDS documented R9 having an indwelling urinary catheter. 4/11/25 11:31 PM - A nursing note documented Obtain UA [urinalysis] and C&S [culture and sensitivity] for urinary discomfort .reported done on day shift. 4/11/25 11:50 AM - A specimen tracking report provided by E9 (Hospital Lab Supervisor) revealed the urine sample for UA and C&S was obtained. 4/11/25 3:38 PM - A specimen tracking report provided by E9 revealed the urine sample for UA and C&S was received from the facility and a urinalysis and urine culture was…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-13 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
  Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview, observation and record review, it was determined that for one (R346) out of one residents reviewed for respiratory care, the facility failed to change oxygen tubing weekly per plan of care. Findings include: 1. Review of R346's clinical record revealed: 7/20/24 - R346 admitted to the facility with diagnoses including but not limited to COPD and Centrilobular Emphysema. 7/20/24 4:05 PM - An order documented, Oxygen tubing change weekly on 11-7 [PM] Wednesdays .Label each component with date and initials. 6/5/25 10:34 AM - Observation of R346's continuous oxygen tubing label was dated Saturday, May 24, 2025 and nebulizer tubing dated Thursday, May 29, 2025. 6/5/25 3:15 PM - A subsequent observation of R346's continuous oxygen tubing label dated Thursday, June 5, 2025. 6/5/25 3:18 PM - During an observation interview E8 (LPN) confirmed that she changed R346's continuous oxygen tubing at the start of their shift [3 PM to 11 PM] on Thursday, June 5, 2025 and that R346's nebulizer tubing was dated Thursday, May 29, 2025. E8 further stated that R346's nebulizer tubing…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-13 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
  Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, it was determined that for one (R98) out of six residents reviewed for unnecessary medications, the facility failed to ensure a resident on insulin had adequate monitoring of blood sugar levels R98. Findings include: A review of R98's clinical record revealed: 11/25/24 - R98 was admitted to the facility, with diagnoses including diabetes mellitus. 11/25/24 - A physician's order for Humalog solution 100 unit /mL Inject 5 units subcutaneously in the evening for diabetes mellitus. 12/5/24 - A physician's order for Insulin glargine subcutaneous solution pen-injector 100 unit/mL, inject 15 units subcutaneously one time a day for diabetes mellitus. 6/9/25 - The EMR lacked evidence of a physician's order for blood sugar monitoring for R98. 6/9/25 11:48 AM, an interview with E6 (RN) confirmed that when a resident is receiving insulin, E6 obtains a physician's order to monitor a resident's finger stick blood sugar level. 6/9/25 1:10 PM - An interview with E4 (RN) confirmed that upon resident admission, finger stick blood sugars are monitored for three…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-07-02 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — pattern
  Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  4. Review of R100's clinical record revealed: 7/26/23 - R100 was admitted to the facility. 7/26/23 - E12 (LPN) completed the following admission assessments: bed rail evaluation, oral health evaluation, and lift transfer evaluation. 7/2/24 10:15 AM - In an interview, E2 (DON) confirmed that LPN's are not to do initial assessments and that they should be completed by an RN. 7/2/24 10:30 AM - An interview with E3 (RN Director UM) confirmed the following admission assessments are expected to be completed at the time of admission by an RN: admission assessment, bed rail, Braden, incontinence, lift evaluation, AIMS (if needed), elopement, fall risk, and pain. 7/2/24 1:50 PM - Findings were reviewed with E1 (NHA) and E2 (DON) at the exit conference. Based on record review and interview, it was determined that for four (R2, R11, R76 and R100) out of thirty-two residents reviewed for care plans, the facility failed to meet professional standards of the Delaware Board of Nursing Scope of Practice by having LPN's and a SW complete the admission assessments. Findings include: Delaware State…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-07-02 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — pattern
  Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  Based on observation and interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide a safe and sanitary environment for the staff. Findings include: 6/24/24 11:24 AM - A large section of the floor in the service area between the entry doors to the kitchen and the entry door to the ware washing room was covered with standing water. Water was dripping from the ceiling area adjacent to the interior hallway doors onto the floor. An additional area of water was dripping from the ceiling near the entrance to the ware washing room onto the floor and into a mop bucket that had been placed under a portion of the dripping area. 6/24/24 1:46 PM - During an interview, E1 (NHA) confirmed the dripping and standing water and stated that the water had come from the second-floor shower room, passed through a managers' office located on the first floor, and dripped into the service area on the ground floor. 7/2/24 1:50 PM - Findings were reviewed with E1 (NHA) and E2 (DON) at the exit conference.

  Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-07-02 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
  Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interviews, and record review it was determined that for one (R37) out of 32 residents reviewed for care plans the facility failed to update and revise a care plan. Findings Include: Review of R37's clinical record revealed: 12/11/23 - R37 was readmitted to the facility from the hospital. 12/16/23 - A quarterly MDS assessment documented . 1. Yes, a hearing aid or other hearing appliance was used to complete the assessment for hearing. 1/18/24 9:00 PM - An order for R37 documented to insert hearing aids in the AM and remove at bedtime. Wipe clean daily. 3/20/24 8:16 PM - A care plan evaluation note by E2 (DON) documented, Resident seen by audiology for hearing impairment. Resident has hearing aides (sic) to assist [with] his impairment. Care plan reviewed and remains appropriate - continue current [plan of care]. 6/6/24 1:41 PM - R37's care plan documented impaired communication as evidenced by impaired hearing. 6/15/24 - A significant change MDS assessment documented . 1. Yes a hearing aid or other hearing appliance was used to complete the assessment for…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-02 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
  Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, it was determined that for one (R11) out of five residents reviewed for medication review, the facility failed to ensure that an order for a PRN medication for anxiety was re-evaluated after 14 days. Findings include: 3/4/24 - Resident admitted to the facility. 3/18/24 - A Physician's order was entered into the MAR: clonazepam Oral Tablet 1 MG (Clonazepam) *Controlled Drug* Give 1 tablet by mouth as needed for anxiety May take 3x/day as needed. The facility lacked evidence that a PRN order for anxiety was re-evaluated by a provider after 14 days of being ordered. 7/1/24 1:33 PM - In an interview, E4 (MD) stated that usually a new PRN order for an anti-anxiety medication is evaluated 14 days after the patient first starts, but not thereafter. E4 stated that this will be fixed. 7/2/24 1:50 PM - Findings were reviewed with E1 (NHA) and E2 (DON) at the exit conference.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to GENESIS HEALTHCARE — 184 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 17 rows in the source record cover these 15 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

10 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 74% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $3.0M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 21% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in DE