Seaford Center
1100 Norman Eskridge Highway, Seaford, DE 19973 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 124 certified beds · (302) 629-3575 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- a middle-of-the-pack inspection score (3/5)
- a high payroll-based staffing rating (4/5)
- it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Sep 2023
- it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- inspectors cited 1 immediate-jeopardy problem — the most serious level
- inspectors recorded 1 serious finding as past non-compliance — the problem was found, fixed, and verified before the survey closed, so it is history rather than a current condition, but it is still worth asking what changed
- a high number of inspection citations overall (55) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $192,384 in federal fines (most recent 2024-09-24)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 3 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 4 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 3 of 5 |
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 3 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 4 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 2 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 1 to 3 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 16.9% | 12.7% | 15.4% | typical |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 8.5% | 5.4% | 5.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.0% | 0.4% | 0.9% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.3% | 2.1% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 12.4% | 10.3% | 6.5% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 2.6% | 3.2% | 3.3% | better |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 22.9% | 13.6% | 16.1% | worse |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 30.7% | 21.8% | 18.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 97.5% | 97.4% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 6.1% | 3.5% | 4.7% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 28.6% | 20.2% | 21.2% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 11.1% | 10.7% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 0.4% | 1.0% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 84.1% | 83.1% | 79.4% | typical |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 21.5% | 23.3% | 22.6% | typical |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 17.3% | 11.6% | 12.0% | worse |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 1.68 | 1.81 | 1.67 | typical |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 0.71 | 1.40 | 1.80 | better |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
44.6% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 116 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 50.9% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 59 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.35 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 59% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 12% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 44.6%CMS range 35.2–54.2 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 12.2%CMS range 8.8–17.6 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 50.9% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 49.1% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 42.4% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 96.5% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 100.0% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 4.7% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 9.8%CMS range 6.3–14.0 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.06 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 124 beds and averages 89.9 residents a day — about 72% occupied, or roughly 34 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.59 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.71 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.21 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.43 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.65 on weekdays — 6% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.84 to 0.39 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 37% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
55 citations, most serious first. The 13 most serious are shown; the remaining 42 are one tap away and print in full.
- Immediate jeopardy · J2023-09-07 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, it was determined that for one (R21) out of fourteen residents reviewed for abuse, the facility failed to ensure that R21 was free of sexual abuse by R6, a resident with a history of sexually inappropriate behavior. The facility's failure to monitor R6 allowed the sexual abuse of R21 on 5/22/22. An Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) was identified and due to the facility's corrective measures following the incident, this is being cited as an immediate jeopardy, past non-compliance with and abatement date of 5/24/22, which was verified by interviews and review of facility records. Findings include: OPS300 Abuse Prohibition Policy (Genesis) stated, .The Center will implement an abuse prohibition program through the following: .prevention of occurrences .Federal Definitions: Sexual Abuse is a non-consensual sexual contact of any type with a resident . 5. Actions to prevent abuse, neglect . 5.2 identifying, correcting and intervening in situations in which abuse, neglect . is more likely to occur; . If the suspected abuse is patient-to-patient,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2023-09-07 · tag F0711 — isolatedEnsure the resident's doctor reviews the resident's care, writes, signs and dates progress notes and orders, at each required visit.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, it was determined that for four (R5, R15, R91 and R102) out of four residents reviewed for Insulin, the facility failed to ensure that the physician reviewed the residents' total program of care as presented in the interfacility transfer documentation. For R91, the physician's failure to ensure that the resident's total program of care was accurately evaluated upon his admission and throughout his stay in the facility placed R91 in Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) of a serious, adverse outcome. The Physician's failure to order an insulin sliding scale, finger stick blood sugar checks, Trojeo (concentrated insulin) medication daily, and the correct frequency of Synjardy (combination anti-diabetic medication containing empagliflozin and metfomin) resulted in R91's metabolic derangement and resultant diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA). R91 was admitted to a hospital critical care unit with the diagnosis of diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA) requiring a continuous insulin drip five days after his admission to the facility. The IJ was identified on 8/31/23 at 3:15 PM and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2024-09-24 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined that for two (R20 and R45) out of two residents reviewed for pressure ulcers, the facility failed to provide care and services to prevent pressure ulcers and promote healing. For R45 the facility failed to prevent an avoidable deep tissue injury from developing to the bilateral heels causing harm. For R20 the facility failed to ensure that the resident was turned and repositioned to prevent pressure ulcers resulting in an avoidable Stage 3 pressure ulcer to the right heel and an avoidable stage 4 pressure ulcer to the left heel, resulting in harm. Findings include: A policy titled Skin Integrity and Wound Management updated 5/1/24 documented a comprehensive initial and ongoing nursing assessment of intrinsic and extrinisic factors that influence skin health, skin/wound impairment, and the ability of a wound to heal will be performed. The plan of care for the patient will be reflective of assessment findings from the comprehensive patient assessment and wound evaluation. Staff will continually observe and monitor…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-09 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview it was determined that for two (R26 and R50) out of three residents reviewed for personal property the facility failed to provide reasonable protection of resident belongings from loss. Findings include: The facility policy on personal property last updated 8/15/23 indicated Personnel will identify and record the patients/residents' belongings upon admission to the Center. All items bought into the Center will be listed on the Inventory of Personal Effects form and kept in the patient's clinical chart. Any additional items brought into the Center after admission must be added to this list. Any loss will be documented on the property loss form and then referred to the Administrator. 1. Review of R26's clinical record revealed: 6/4/25 - A quarterly MDS assessment documented that R26 was mentally intact. 9/2/25 11:10 AM - During an interview, R26 disclosed he had several items of clothing missing. R26 stated, I have five sweatpants, one hoodie, two sweatshirts, four t-shirt's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-09 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolatedHonor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview, record review, and review of other facility documentation, it was determined that for one (R50) out of one resident reviewed for grievances, that the facility failed to ensure prompt efforts were made to resolve the resident's concerns. Findings include:Review of R50's clinical record revealed:3/7/19 - R50 was admitted to the facility. 5/4/24 2:30 PM - A grievance/concern log documented that R50 stated he was unsure where the clothing could have gone, it is possible that the laundry misplaced the clothing. On May 7, 2024, E4 (housekeeping Director) checked the laundry room and did not find any missing clothing.7/24/25 - A quarterly MDS documented a BIMS of 15, and that R50 was cognitively intact9/2/25 12:22 PM - During an interview, R50 stated, my underwear, shirts, pants, and cowboy jersey were missing. 9/4/24 2:30 PM - During an interview with E4 he stated he was going today to buy R50 some clothes.9/4/24 2:45 PM - An interview with E3 (Quality Manager) confirmed the facility lacked evidence of a prompt response/resolution for R50's missing shirt, pants,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-09 · tag F0644 — isolatedCoordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, it was determined that for three (R4, R28 and R74) out of three residents reviewed for a level II PASRR, the facility failed to ensure that a referral for a level II PASRR screening was required following a new diagnosis for a mental health disorder. Findings include:1. Review of R4's clinical record revealed: 5/9/25 - A notice of PASRR level I screening outcome documented the following mental health diagnoses: major depression (recurrent, unspecified), anxiety disorder (suspected), 6/7/25 - R4 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses including but not limited to, bipolar disorder, anxiety disorder and depression. 6/8/25 - A care plan documented that R4 was at risk for complications related to the use of psychotropic drugs for depression and is at risk for distressed/fluctuating mood symptoms related to depression. 6/9/25 - An initial psychiatric evaluation documented depressed mood and listed the following medications for depression: doxepin 25 mg daily at bedtime, lurasidone 20 mg daily, sertraline 75 mg daily. 6/25/25 - In the electronic…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-09 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, it was determined that for one (R113) out of thirty residents reviewed in the investigative sample, the facility failed to develop a care plan to address an identified concern. Findings include: Review of R113's clinical record revealed:10/11/24 - R113 was admitted to the facility.3/20/25 12:00 AM - A wound note by E12 (Wound NP) documented that R113 was non-compliant with turning and repositioning and tells staff to leave her alone.3/27/25 3:59 AM - A wound note by E12 (Wound NP) documented that R113 was non-compliant with turning and repositioning and tells staff to leave her alone.9/4/25 11:08 AM - During an interview, E12 (Wound NP) stated that R113 would refuse to have her wounds touched and resisted care.9/4/25 12:09 PM - During an interview, E16 (NP) stated that R113 was resistant to care and refused to get out of bed.9/4/25 11:43 AM - During an interview, E17 (wound nurse) stated that R113 was behavioral, resistant to care and would refuse to allow staff to turn and reposition her.9/4/25 12:25 PM - A review of R113's care plan lacked…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-09-09 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview it was determined that for one (R79) out of ninety-one residents screened during the initial pool process the facility failed to ensure that medications were administered in accordance with professional standards. Findings include: The facility policy on medication guidelines last updated January 2025 indicated, The resident is always observed after administration to ensure that the dose was completed ingested. 9/2/25 9:16 AM - Upon entry into R79's room, the surveyor observed six pills on top of the bedside table. R79 stated I don't know what these are do you? The surveyor left the room and immediately returned with E13 (LPN) who confirmed leaving R79's medications without ensuring they were ingested. 9/9/25 2:00 PM - Findings were reviewed with E1 (NHA) and E3 (Quality Manager) during the exit conference.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-09 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, it was determined that for one (R12) out of two residents reviewed for positioning, the facility failed to turn and reposition the resident and promote the healing of a pressure ulcer in accordance with professional standards of practice to prevent skin breakdown. Findings include:Review of R12's clinical record revealed:6/20/25 - R12 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses including stroke, dementia, muscle weakness, adult failure to thrive and a stage 3 sacral pressure ulcer.6/27/25 - An admission MDS documented that R12 was totally dependent for turning and repositioning. R12 had impairments on both sides for the upper and lower extremities. 7/12/25 - A nursing Braden Scale documented R12 with a score of 9.0 (9.0 or below is a very high risk for development of a pressure ulcer).8/20/25 - A care plan for R12 was documented to include turning and repositioning, as well as performing a skin check every 2 hours.On the following dates and times, R12 was observed lying in bed on his back with the head of the bed upright (approx. 45…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-09-09 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolatedEnsure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined that for one (R12) out of one resident reviewed for tube feeding, the facility failed to utilize a feeding tube in accordance with current professional standards of practice. Findings include:Review of the facility's policy and procedure titled Enteral Feeding: Administration by Pump, last revised 2/24/25, documented, . 15.3.2 Fill in the information on the container's label (patient's name, room number, date, start time, and flow rate) . 15.3.3 Label the administration set with start date and time .Review of R12's clinical record revealed:6/20/25 - R12 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses including but not limited to stroke, dementia, dysphagia, adult failure to thrive and severe protein-calorie malnutrition.6/27/25 - An admission MDS documented that R12 was on a mechanically altered diet with a feeding tube. 8/20/25 - A care plan for R12 documented that he has an enteral feeding tube to meet nutritional needs.9/2/25 10:57 AM - A direct observation revealed that Jevity 1.2 cal (a type of tube feeding) was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-09 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined that for one (R13) out of one residents reviewed for respiratory care, the facility failed to ensure R13's oxygen mask and nebulizer equipment were stored in a protective plastic bag. Findings include:Review of the facility's policy and procedure titled Nebulizer: Small Volume, last revised 11/1/23, documented, . 21.1 Place in treatment bag labeled with patient name and date.Review of R13's clinical record revealed:4/10/24 - R13 was admitted to the facility.4/8/25 - A physician order for R13 documented ipratropium-albuterol solution 0.5 - 2.5 mg/3mL, inhale 3mL orally every 6 hours as needed for shortness of breath or wheezing.8/20/25 - A care plan documented R13 as receiving respiratory treatments as ordered due to a history of COPD (chronic obstructive pulmonary disease).8/29/25 - A significant change MDS documented that R13 received respiratory therapy. 9/2/25 10:39 AM - An observation noted R13's oxygen mask with nebulizer unit attached sitting on top of the bedside table. There was no protective bag available…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-09 · tag F0791 — failed to provide routine dental services — isolatedProvide or obtain dental services for each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined that for one (R10) out of two residents reviewed for dental services the facility failed to provide assistance with dental services. Findings include: The facility policy on Dental Services last updated 9/1/22 indicated, Centers will provide or obtain from an outside resource routine and emergency dental services to meet the needs of each patient. Review of R10's clinical record revealed: 5/8/25 - R10 was admitted to the facility with Medicaid as a source of coverage. 5/15/25 - An admission MDS assessment documented that R10 was cognitively intact and broken natural teeth. 5/31/25 - A care plan was created for R10's dental problems related to broken, loose and carious teeth. Dental referrals as needed was listed as an intervention. 9/2/25 9:30 AM - During an interview, R10 stated, Supposedly they have a dentist, I talked to the unit manager [E9 (RNUM)] and I haven't heard anything it's been a couple of weeks. 9/4/25 10:12 AM - During an interview, E7 (SSD) reported being unaware of a request for dental services from…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-09 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview it was determined that for one (R47) out of three residents reviewed for wound care the facility failed to ensure adherence to practices that prevent the spread infection. Findings include: The CDC's webpage entitled, Implementation of Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) Use in Nursing Homes to prevent the spread of Multidrug-resistant Organisms (MDRO's) indicated Enhanced Barrier Precautions: Examples of high-contact resident care activities requiring gown and glove use for EBP include wound care: any skin opening requiring a dressing. (Face protection may also be needed if performing activity with risk of splash or spray). https://www.cdc.gov/long-term-care-facilities/hcp/prevent-mdro/ppe.htmlReview of R47's clinical record revealed: 8/21/25 - R47 was admitted to the facility with multiple conditions including Hidradenitis Suppruativa (HS - a chronic inflammatory skin condition characterized by painful lumps, abscesses [pus filled areas] and scarring) and was being treated for wound infections related to the diagnosis. 8/22/25 - A physician's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 42 citations
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-12 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review it was determined that for one (R1) out of three residents reviewed for abuse the facility failed to report an allegation of sexual abuse within the required time constraints. Based on the facility's evidence to correct the noncompliance at the time of the current survey, the deficiency was determined to be past non-compliance as of 6/6/25. Findings include: Review of R1's clinical record revealed: 6/27/23 - R1 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses including but not limited to hypertension, low back pain and nervous system disorders. 5/27/25 2:38 PM - An incident summary documented On 5/24/25 [R4 (Spouse)] reported being in the bathroom and R1 and E4 (Activity Aide) were together in the activity room and E4 (Activity Aid) asked R1 to see his private parts R4 also reported R1 was very upset and asked R4 to report this 6/3/25 E1 (NHA) documented An employee passed me in the hallway and said R4 and R1 wants to see you 6/3/25 - A facility provided statement written by E1 (NHA) documented T.C. (sic) with E5 (Activities Director) I heard on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-12-19 · tag F0635 — isolatedProvide doctor's orders for the resident's immediate care at the time the resident was admitted.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, it was determined that for one (R2) out of two residents reviewed for respiratory therapy, the facility failed to have R2's BiPAP settings orders in R2's EMR at admission. Findings include: Facility's Bi-Level Positive Airway Pressure (BiPAP)/ Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (CPAP) procedure policy- . 1. Verify order . 9. Initial set-up: 9.1 Apply ordered settings to the unit per manufacturer's instructions . 11/30/24 - C1 (MD) documented in R2's [Hospital] discharge summary, .Plan: . OSA (Obstructive sleep apnea) BiPAP nightly . 11/30/24 - R2 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses, including but were not limited to, obstructive sleep apnea (OSA), emphysema and chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia (low oxygen concentration in the blood). 11/30/24 - E9 (Admissions) uploaded into R2's EMR a copy of R2's [hospital] BiPAP orders stating .Uses BiPAP HS at night. RT to titrate based home settings .IPAP (cmH2O) 21, PEEP/CPAP (cmH2O) 17, FiO2 40%. 11/30/24 9:44 PM - E8 (RN) documented in R2's EMR, . admission details: arrived by ambulance…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-12-19 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, it was determined that for three (R1, R5, R6) out of three residents reviewed for dialysis, the facility failed to establish a process to obtain complete lab reports from the dialysis provider. Findings include: Cross refer F711, F775 and F842. Facility NSG253 Dialysis: Hemodialysis (HD) - Communication and Documentation Policy- Center staff will communicate with the certified dialysis facility regarding the ongoing assessment of the patient's condition by monitoring for complications before and after hemodialysis treatments received at a certified dialysis facility. Purpose: To ensure ongoing communication and collaboration with the certified dialysis facility regarding hemodialysis patient care and services . 1 .Review of R5's clinical record revealed: 6/26/24 - R5 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses including but not limited to, diabetes, anemia, seizure disorder and end stage renal disease with dependence on hemodialysis (an invasive treatment for advanced…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-19 · tag F0711 — isolatedEnsure the resident's doctor reviews the resident's care, writes, signs and dates progress notes and orders, at each required visit.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interviews, it was determined that for three (R1, R5, R6) out of six residents reviewed for Physician Services, the facility failed to have the physician review the resident's total program of care. For R1, the physician failed to review R1's lab work (resident had labs obtained at hemodialysis) and regarding R1's supplemental oxygen usage. For R5 and R6, the physician failed to review lab work obtained at hemodialysis. R6 had a known hospitalization for hyperkalemia in November 2024. Findings include: Cross refer F698, F775 and F842 1. Review of R1's clinical record revealed: 11/15/24 - R1 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses including but not limited to, hyperlipidemia, end stage renal disease and stroke. 11/15/24 - E7 (MD) ordered in R1's EMR, .Dialysis days: Mondays, Wednesdays and Fridays . 11/18/24 - E7 (MD) ordered in R1's EMR, . Oxygen 2 L (liters) every shift . Review of R1's vital signs for pulse oximetry monitoring from 11/18/24 to 12/11/24 (the date of transfer to the hospital) revealed thirty-six documented occasions of pulse ox…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-12-19 · tag F0775 — isolatedKeep complete, dated laboratory records in the resident's record.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, it was determined that for two (R5, R6) out of three residents reviewed for dialysis, the facility failed to have the clinical record laboratory report containing the name and address of the testing lab in the residents' EMR. Findings include: Cross refer F698, F711 and F842. 1. Review of R5's clinical record revealed: 6/26/24 - R5 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses including but not limited to, diabetes, anemia, seizure disorder and end stage renal disease with dependence on hemodialysis. 6/26/24 - E7 (MD) ordered in R5's electronic medical record (EMR), .Dialysis days: T-Th- Sat Time for pick up: 0600 . 12/19/24 2:40 PM - During a telephone interview, C4 ([outside hemodialysis center 2] RN/ facility administrator) stated, [R5] gets lab work drawn every month. We use [laboratory] for our lab work. We have standing orders for hemodialysis patients that require monthly lab work with redraws as needed . We do not send the official lab reports to the facility. R5 had lab work obtained at the [hemodialysis center 2] in August, September,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-19 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, it was determined that for three (R1, R5, R6) out of three residents reviewed for dialysis, the facility failed to maintain medical records that were complete and readily accessible with regards to lab results. Findings include: Cross refer F698, F711 and F775. 1. Review of R5's clinical record revealed: 6/26/24 - R5 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses including but not limited to, diabetes, anemia, seizure disorder and end stage renal disease with dependence on hemodialysis. 6/26/24 - E7 (MD) ordered in R5's electronic medical record (EMR), .Dialysis days: T-Th- Sat Time for pick up: 0600 . Review of R5's lab results tab in the EMR reveal no laboratory blood work since 7/26/24. R5 did have COVID screening lab results as recent as 11/6/24 in the lab results profile. 12/19/24 2:40 PM - During a telephone interview, C4 ([outside hemodialysis center 2]RN/ facility administrator) stated, [R5] gets lab work drawn every month. We have standing orders for hemodialysis patients that require monthly lab work with redraws as needed . We do not…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-09-24 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — patternDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, it was determined that for four (R7, R22, R43 and R66) out of twenty (20) sampled residents, the facility failed to ensure that the required interdisciplinary team (IDT) members participated in the care plan meetings and that meetings occurred every three months. In addition, R66's care plan had not been reviewed and revised to reflect a behavior of frequently removing his nebulizer equipment from the protective plastic bag. Findings include: 1. Review of R7's clinical record revealed: 4/10/24 - R7 was admitted to the facility. 9/19/24 - A review of the notes for the initial care plan meeting on 4/25/24 lacked evidence of input from the Physician. Additionally, there was no evidence that a quarterly care plan meeting occurred in July, 2024. 2. Review of R22's clinical record revealed: 4/10/14 - R22 was admitted to the facility. 9/19/24 - A review of the notes for the care plan meeting on 10/11/23 lacked evidence of input from R22's nurse. A review of the notes for the care plan meeting on 8/14/24 lacked evidence of input from the Physician.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-09-24 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — patternProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review it was determined that for three (R20, R38 and R45) out of three residents reviewed for bowel and bladder, the facility failed to respond to or provide services to maintain or restore bladder continence. Findings include: A policy revised on 6/15/22 titled Continence Management documented continence status will be reviewed quarterly as part of the care planning process to provide appropriate treatment and services for patients with urinary incontinence to restore continence to the extent possible. 1. Review of R20's clinical record revealed: 5/12/22 - R20 was admitted to the facility. 5/5/24 - The Annual MDS assessment documented that R20 was dependent for toileting hygiene and not on a toileting program. The MDS also documented that R20 was frequently incontinent of bowel and bladder. 5/2024 - The CNA task sheet documented that R20 was incontinent of urine seventy-three out of eighty-five opportunities. 6/2024 - The CNA task sheet documented that R20 was incontinent of urine seventy-eight out of eighty-four opportunities. 6/12/24 - A skilled…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-09-24 · tag F0730 — patternObserve each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, it was determined that for five (E7, E8, E9, E10 and E11) out of five certified nursing assistants reviewed, the facility failed to complete an annual evaluation. Findings include: 9/23/24 approximately 8:50 AM - E1 (NHA) provided documentation regarding CNA evaluations for the following employees: E7 (CNA) with a date of hire of 12/6/22; E8 (CNA) with a date of hire of 5/24/22; E9 (CNA) with a date of hire of 11/20/17; E10 (CNA) with a date of hire of 10/14/19; E11 (CNA) with a date of hire of 3/7/23; 9/23/24 11:59 AM - In an interview, E1 stated that there had been a system failure due to turnover with facility staff. The facility was in the process of completing the overdue performance evaluations at the time of the survey. 9/24/24 2:00 PM - Findings were reviewed with E1, E2 (DON) and E3 (Corporate 1) at the exit conference.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-09-24 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview it was determined that the facility failed to ensure food was stored, prepared, and served in a manner that prevents food borne illness to the residents. Findings include: 9/16/24 - 9:15 AM - During the initial tour of the kitchen, an open plactic bag containing lettuce and celery with browned edges and negative changes in quality and texture was observed in the walk-in refrigerator. 9/17/24 - 8:50 AM - During a tour of the kitchen, a puddle of standing water was observed under the ice machine and the water line that supplies the ice machine. 9/17/24 - 9:25 AM - During a tour of the kitchen, the surveyor observed E13 (Dietary Services Manager) test the sanitizer level of the solution in two red sanitizing buckets. When E13 tested the sanitizing solution, the test strips from each of the buckets indicated that the level of chemical concentration in the buckets was not at a sufficient level to provide proper sanitization. 9/24/24 2:00 PM - Findings were reviewed with E1 (NHA), E2 (DON) and E3 (Corporate 1) at the exit conference.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-24 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolatedHonor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, it was determined that for one (R18) out of six residents reviewed for activities of daily living (ADLs), the facility failed to get R18 out of bed in accordance with his preference. Findings include: Review of R18's clinical record revealed: 1/31/24 - R18 was admitted to the facility. 8/8/24 - A quartlerly MDS documented that R18 was dependent for transfer and requires a sit to stand lift for transfer. R18 has a BIMS score of 13 and was cognitively intact. 9/16/24 10:58 AM - An observation of R18 laying in bed watching television. 9/17/24 10:45 AM - An observation of R18 laying in bed watching television. 9/18/24 1:06 PM - An observation of R18 laying in bed watching television. 9/19/24 12:41 PM - An observation of R18 laying in bed watching television. 9/20/24 9:25 AM - An observation of R18 laying in bed watching television. 9/23/24 12:00 PM - An interview with R18 revealed that his preference is to get out of bed daily. R18 stated that staff tells him they are too busy to get him out of bed. 9/23/24 12:14 PM - An interview with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-09-24 · tag F0582 — isolatedGive residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of facility documentation and interview it was determined that for two (R10 and R48) out of three Medicare Part A discharges reviewed the facility failed to have evidence of a completed Skilled Nursing Facility Advance Beneficiary Notice (SNFABN). Findings include: Review of surveyor requested Skilled Nursing Facility Beneficiary Protection form for three discharged Medicare A residents the following was revealed: 1. R10 started Medicare Part A skilled services on 2/15/24. The last day of covered services was 4/2/24. The resident stayed at the facility as a long-term care resident. There was no evidence the facility provided the SNFABN when Medicare Part A services ended and the resident converted to another payer source. 2. R48 started Medicare Part A skilled services on 4/29/24. The last day of covered services was 7/2/24. The resident stayed at the facility as a long-term care resident. There was no evidence the facility provided the SNFABN when Medicare Part A services ended and the resident converted to another payer source. 9/23/24 2:00 PM - During an…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-24 · tag F0644 — isolatedCoordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, it has been determined that for one (R64) out of three sampled for PASARR, the facility failed to ensure a referral for a PASARR screening was done for a new mental health diagnosis. Findings include: Review of R64's clinical record revealed: 1/8/23 - R64 was admitted to the facility with the following diagnoses of atrial fibrillation (irregular rapid heart rate), hypertension and major depressive disorder. 1/6/23 - Review of R64's PASARR Level I screen outcome documented . No Level II required 2. No SMI (serious mental illness), ID (intellectual disability or RC (related condition). 12/30/23 - R64's annual MDS (Minimum Data Set) documented a new diagnosis of schizophrenia. 9/23/24 11:50 AM - E6 (SW) was interviewed and stated, I am not sure if a new PASARR application was done for [R64], I wasn't here then, but I can check. I'm not finding her; I'm searching for her and it's not here. It looks like there was not a new one, but it looks like she is due for a PASARR on 9/22/24, and honestly I am working on it now. 9/24/24 11:40 AM - Findings were…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-24 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, it was determined that for two (R39 and R89) out of six residents reviewed for ADLs, the facility failed to ensure ADLs were provided to dependent residents. Findings include: A facility policy and procedure titled, Activities of Daily Living (ADLs) revised 5/1/23 documented . Activities of daily living include, hygiene, bathing, dressing, grooming, and oral care. 1. Review of R39's clinical record revealed: 4/12/21 - R39 was admitted to the facility. 8/24/24 - The CNA task list documented R39's shower schedule was on Tuesday and Friday on the 7 AM to 3 PM shift and prefers a bed bath. 9/8/24 - The quarterly MDS documented that R39 was dependent for bathing and personal hygiene. 9/16/24 10:58 AM - An observation of R39 with overgrown finger nails with debris noted underneath. 9/17/24 11:05 AM - An observation of R39 with overgrown finger nails with debris noted underneath. 9/17/24 - A review of the CNA task flow sheet revealed that R39 had a complete bed bath. 9/18/24 2:06 PM…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-24 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, it has been determined that for one (R66) out of two residents sampled for respiratory care the facility failed to provide professional standards of practice by ensuring R66's nebulizer equipment was stored in a protective plastic bag. Findings include: Cross refer F657 Review of R66's clinical record revealed: 5/24/23 - R66 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses including, but not limited to, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (lung disease that blocks air flow and makes it difficult to breathe) and stroke. 12/5/23 2:00 PM - A physician's order written for R66 documented . Albuterol Sulfate Nebulization Solution (2.5 MG/3ML) 0.083% 3 ml inhale as needed for Shortness of Breath Pre-treatment evaluation in supplemental documentation. In progress note document response to instructions and education and any adverse reactions. Notify the provider of any adverse reactions. 8/30/24 - A quarterly MDS (Minimum Data Set) assessment revealed R66 was severely cognitively impaired. 9/16/24 10:09 AM - R66's nebulizer tubing and mask…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-09-24 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, it was determined that for two (R22 and R57) out of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications, it was determined that psychoactive medications lacked monitoring. For R22, the facility failed to ensure adequate monitoring with an AIMS assessment. Additonally, the facility failed to monitor R57, a resident taking antipsychotic medication, for symptoms of psychosis. Findings include: A policy and procedure titled Behaviors: Management of Symptoms revised 7/1/24 documented . Patients exhibiting behavioral symptoms will be individually evaluated to determine the behavior. The interdisciplinary team identifies underlying medical, physical, functional, psychosocial, emotional, psychiatric, or environmental causes that contribute to the patient's behavior. Mental disorders are usually associated with significant distress or disability in social, occupational, or other important activities. 4/10/14 - R22 was admitted to the facility. 8/2023 - R22's MAR reflected that he was ordered Zyprexa (olanzapine) tablet 10 MG Give 0.5 tablet by mouth one…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-04-29 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, it was determined that for one (R11) out of three residents reviewed for change in condition, the facility failed to immediately consult the Physician when R11 experienced a change in condition. Findings include: Cross refer F684 Review of R11's clinical record revealed: 11/8/11 - R11 was admitted to the facility. 9/10/23 - R11 was diagnosed with panlobular emphysema, chronic obstructive pulmonary disorder (COPD), and chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia. 10/24/23 - A physician's order was written for oxygen at 6 liters per min continuously via nasal cannula. 1/6/24 7:40 AM - A progress note revealed that R11 was experiencing dyspnea (difficulty breathing) with labored breathing. R11's pulse oximetry was 85% on 6 liters of oxygen and R11 was requesting to be sent to the hospital. 4/26/24 2:40 PM - An interview with E6 (RN) confirmed that the aforementioned progress note on 1/6/24 was the care she performed for R11. There is no evidence that E6 contacted the provider regarding the change in condition for R11. The facility records lacked…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-29 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interviews, it was determined that for one (R14) out of three residents reviewed for ADLs, the facility failed to ensure ADLs were provided to dependent residents. Findings include: Review of R14's clinical record revealed: 3/21/24 - R14 was admitted to the facility. 3/22/24 - A care plan revealed that R14 was dependent for ADL care including bathing, grooming, personal hygiene, dressing, eating, bed mobility, transfer, locomotion and toileting related to limited mobility. 3/27/24 - An admission MDS revealed that R14 was cognitively intact and was dependent for eating, bathing, toileting, dressing, personal hygiene and transfers. 4/26/24 - A review of the CNA task sheet lacked evidence of care provided to R14 on the following dates on the 7AM - 3PM shift: March 25, 2024; March 26, 2024; April 2, 2024; April 9, 2024; April 16, 2024; April 17, 2024; April 19, 2024; April 22, 2024; April 24, 2024; April 25, 2024. 4/29/24 1:45 PM - An interview with E7 (CNA) confirmed that the CNA task flow sheet lacked evidence that care was provided to R14 for the following…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-29 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interviews and record review it was determined that for one (R11) out of three residents reviewed for quality of care, the facility failed to ensure treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice. R11 had a change in respiratory status that was unrecognized and hospital transfer was delayed. Findings include: Cross refer F580 Review of R11's clinical record revealed: 11/8/11 - R11 was admitted to the facility. 9/10/23 - R11 had diagnoses including but not limited to panlobular emphysema, chronic obstructive pulmonary disorder (COPD), and chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia. 10/24/23 - A physician's order for R11 was written for oxygen at 6 liters per min continuously via nasal cannula. January 2024 - R11's MAR revealed a baseline oxygen levels between 92 and 98 percent on 6 liters of oxygen. 1/5/24 1:45 PM - A progress note from a respiratory therapist revealed that R11 was ambulating to the bathroom and the pulse oximeter reading was 86% on 6 liters of oxygen. E5 assisted R11 back to bed, applied her Bipap mask and rechecked R11's pulse…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-09-07 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — widespreadHonor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, it was determined that the facility failed to establish a Grievance Policy that informed the residents of their right to obtain written decision regarding their grievance. The posted grievance policy did not have the correct name of the current Grievance Official and contact information. Also, the grievance policy was not prominently displayed at wheelchair level in large print to accommodate wheelchair bound and /or poor visual acuity residents. The grievance box for completed grievance forms outside the main office is not marked as the grievance box nor is it at wheelchair level. Additionally for R70, the facility failed to inform R70 of the outcome of his grievance investigation or offer R70 a resolution to his grievance. Findings include: 1- Review of the facility revealed: 8/15/23 9:13 AM - The Surveyor observed three pin up boards on three different hallways that were covered with glass that displayed the typewritten Grievance/ Concerns Policy & Procedure as depicted in the 2023 Welcome packet. The posting stated E45 (former NHA) was the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-09-07 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview it was determined that the facility failed to ensure safe sanitary storage of food, provide the sanitizing solution required for disinfecting food preparation surfaces, and maintain sanitary food preparation areas. Findings include: 8/14/23 10:10 AM - During a kitchen tour, several food items including a container of sliced beets, a large container of a red liquid, a large container of a yellow liquid, and a container of unidentified leftovers were observed with partially open coverings exposing the contents to dust and other debris in the walk-in refrigerator. The reach-in refrigerator contained cartons of thickened juices, sandwiches, and salads, which were missing the date stamp required for safe food storage. 8/14/23 10:20 AM - During a tour of the kitchen, no red sanitizer buckets containing sanitizing solution were available in the kitchen for disinfecting food preparation surfaces. 8/14/23 10:25 AM - Crumbs and other food debris were observed on the floor in the kitchen and food prep surfaces in areas where food prep was not occurring during…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2023-09-07 · tag F0868 — widespreadHave the Quality Assessment and Assurance group have the required members and meet at least quarterly
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure attendance of required members at the quarterly quality assurance and performance improvement (QAPI) meetings. Findings include: Review of the facility's QAPI plan, last updated 1/6/21, indicated, .Meets at least 10 times annually . is composed of . The Infection Preventionist, or designee 8/21/23 - A review of the QAPI Meeting Sign-in Sheets revealed that the Infection Preventionist or designee was not present during the 10/20/22, 11/22/22, 12/22/22, 1/19/23, 2/23/23, 3/23/23, 4/27/23, 5/15/23, or the 7/27/23 meetings. 8/21/23 10:45 AM - During an interview with E1 (NHA) and E2 (DON), it was confirmed that E20 (Infection Preventionist) had been in that role with the facility for more than one year and was not in attendance during the quarterly QAPI meetings. 8/21/23 2:50 PM - Findings were reviewed with E1, E2 and E3 (ADON).
- Potential for harm · E2023-09-07 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — patternHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on random observation and interview, it was determined that for one (Unit 2) of two units reviewed, the facility failed to promote care for residents in a manner and environment that maintained or enhanced each resident's dignity and respect in full recognition of his or her own individuality. Findings include: 8/17/23 12:36 PM - The Surveyor observed that R15's lunch tray had plastic utensils. R15 was unable to pick up his grilled chicken caesar salad as the plastic fork kept bending as R15 tried to spear it with the plastic utensil. 8/17/23 12:40 PM - A random observation of Unit 2's lunch trays by the Surveyor revealed that seven rooms (229 B, 236 A, 236 B, 238 A, 238 B, 240 A and 240 B) out of thirty-six (36) rooms with lunch trays had plastic utensils on their tray. 8/17/23 12:49 PM - During an interview, E2 (DON) stated that she was not aware of any issues with the kitchen's dishwasher but that is not my area. 8/17/23 12:49 PM - During an interview, when notified of the plastic utensils on lunch trays and asked if there was a problem with the dishwasher in the kitchen,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-09-07 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, it was determined that for two out of two resident units, the facility failed to provide a clean and homelike environment. Findings include: 1. 8/14/23 2:50 PM - During an observation of Unit 1, room [ROOM NUMBER] bathroom had scuffs noted on wall, the toilet was stained and appeared uncleaned and tiles behind the toilet were loose and elevated in the air. A repeat observation for room [ROOM NUMBER] on 8/18/23 9:22 AM revealed scuffs remained on wall and the toilet not cleaned. 8/14/23 9:52 AM - room [ROOM NUMBER] revealed that the door handle to room did not engage with lock when the handle was turned. The bathroom had black stains noted on floor in multiple areas, stains noted around base of toilet and stains inside toilet. The hot water faucet knob was missing the end piece resulting in a flat edge exposed. A repeat observation on 8/18/23 at 9:24 AM revealed that the door handle was not functioning, the sink knob was still not replaced or repaired, and stains remain on the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-09-07 · tag F0730 — patternObserve each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, it was determined that for four (E13, E14, E15, and E16) out of five certified nursing assistants reviewed, the facility failed to complete an annual evaluation. Findings include: 8/18/23 approximately 9:00 AM - E1 (NHA) brought documentation regarding the following CNA's evaluations, which occurred on the following dates: E13 (CNA), column undated (date of hire 7/12/22) E14 (CNA), 10/4/21 (date of hire 4/13/21) E15 (CNA), 5/10/22 (date of hire 4/5/88) E16 (CNA), 5/30/20 (hire date 5/29/01) 8/21/23 12:56 PM - When questioned about yearly performance reviews, E2 (DON) stated it is not the company's policy to do a yearly review for CNA's. 8/21/23 2:50 PM - Findings were reviewed with E1, E2 and E3 (ADON).
- Potential for harm · E2023-09-07 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that medications were stored and labeled properly in two out of six medication carts and in one out of two medication rooms reviewed. In addition, the facility failed to monitor refrigerator temperatures in one medication fridge on Unit 1. Findings include: [DATE] 1:07 PM - During a medication storage review of the Unit 1 Medication Room the following was observed inside the medication room: 1. Expired on [DATE] Flu vaccine: two bottles and one box of pre-filled syringes. 2. Expired on [DATE] Epi-pen (medication to treat allergic reactions). 3. Expired on 8/22 bottle of Pedialyte. 4. Expired on 12/22 package of Cepacol throat lozenges. 5. Expired on 11/22 bottle of Magnesium. 6. Albuterol inhalation solution: opened and no date. [DATE] 1:23 PM - A review of temperature log for the medication fridge revealed that facility failed to monitor temperatures. [DATE] 1:27 PM - An interview with E11 (RN) confirmed medications were…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-09-07 · tag F0791 — failed to provide routine dental services — patternProvide or obtain dental services for each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, it was determined that for four (R7, R16, R20 and R60) out of six sampled residents for dental services, the facility failed to assist the residents in obtaining routine dental services. Findings include: A facility policy and procedure titled, OPS160 Dental Services, with last revision of 9/1/22, documented, Routine dental services means an annual inspection of the oral cavity for signs of disease, diagnosis of dental disease, dental radiographs as needed, dental cleaning, fillings (new and repairs), minor partial or full denture adjustments, smoothing of broken teeth, and limited prosthodontic procedures, e.g., taking impressions for dentures and fitting dentures. 1. Review of R7's clinical record revealed: 4/17/23 - R7 was admitted to the facility. 4/17/23 - R7's care plan documented that R7 .exhibits or is at risk for oral health or dental care problems as evidenced by absence of natural teeth 4/23/23 - The admission MDS assessment documented that R7 had no natural teeth or [having] tooth fragments. 8/14/23 9:57 AM - During an…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-09-07 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, it was determined, the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary environment to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections. Findings include: The manufacture's instructions for cleaning and disinfecting, with a revision of March 2015, indicated cleaning and disinfecting of the glucometer needs to be completed after each resident use. 8/16/23 9:44 AM - During medication administration observation, E12 (LPN) used an alcohol pad before and after performing fingerstick blood sugar testing. 8/16/23 11:04 AM - During medication administration observation, E12 (LPN) used an alcohol pad before and after performing fingerstick blood sugar testing. 8/17/23 10:48 AM - During medication administration observation, E24 (RN) used an alcohol pad before and after performing fingerstick blood sugar testing. 8/21/23 10:23 AM - During an interview E22 (RN) stated she uses an alcohol pad to clean the glucometer, they don't have any more…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-07 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolatedHonor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation, and interview, it was determined that for one (R264) out of five residents reviewed for activities of daily living (ADLs), the facility failed to get R77 out of bed in accordance with her preference. Findings include: Review of R264's clinical record revealed: 6/4/22 - admission to the facility. A care plan initiated on 6/23/22 revealed, Resident/Patient is at risk for or is experiencing adjustment issues related to: Change in customary lifestyle and routines and/or difficulty accepting placement in center. A care plan initiated on 6/23/22 revealed, Review ADL status for impact on social involvement and provide ADL assistance, as needed, to increase social involvement. A care plan initiated on 7/23/22 revealed, It is important for me to go outside when the weather is good and enjoys sitting/relaxing and smoking-on occasion. 10/11/22 - A physician's order documented the resident is a total lift with all transfers into wheelchair. An annual MDS dated [DATE] confirmed R77 is an…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-07 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, it was determined that for one (R393) of fourteen (14) residents reviewed for abuse, the facility failed to ensure that an allegation of abuse was reported to the State Agency within the two hour time frame. Findings include: 8/2/23 - R393 admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included traumatic brain injury and epilepsy. 8/8/23 - R393's Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment documented moderate cognitive impairment, extensive two-person assist to transfer and use the toilet, frequently incontinent of bladder and always incontinent of bowel. 8/9/23 - During an interview, E44 (CNA) alleged witnessing R393 as the recipient of a verbally abusive statement from E2 (DON) in which R393 was told to just shit on himself . when R393 was asking to go to the bathroom. E44 then verbally reported this allegation to E8 (Social worker), who asked E44 to write a statement. 8/21/23 9:37 AM - The Surveyor was given a witness statement written by E44 (CNA) documenting R393 making an allegation of verbal abuse against another staff member. E44 stated, I'm not…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-09-07 · tag F0655 — isolatedCreate and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview it was determined that for two (R91 and R192) out of two new admissions reviewed the facility failed to ensure a written summary of their baseline care plan was provided. Findings include: 1. Review of R91's clinical record revealed: 6/16/23 - R91 was admitted to the facility. Review of R91's clinical record lacked evidence that the facility provided the resident and their representative with a summary of the baseline care plan. During an interview on 8/15/23 at 8:50 AM with CG1, it was reported that R91 and CG1 did not receive a copy of the baseline care plan summary. During an interview on 8/17/23 at 10:10 AM E4 (RNC) stated, Families/residents are sat down with staff at the 72 hour care plan meeting and they receive the summary then. 2. Review of R192's clinical records revealed: 8/5/23 - admission to facility. 8/11/23 - admission MDS revealed R192 was cognitively intact. 8/17/23 10:10 AM - E4 (Corporate) stated to two members of the Survey team that the facility sat families down at a 72-hour care plan meeting. 8/17/23 12:35 PM - R192…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-07 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, it was determined that for two (R13 and R82) out of twenty-six (26) of the investigative sampled residents the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person centered care plan for identified needs. Findings include: 1. Review of R13's clinical record revealed: 9/11/09 - R13 was admitted to the facility. 4/25/23 - A physician order was written for a hospice consult per family request. 5/7/23 - A quarterly MDS documented severe cognitive impairment. 6/30/23 - Review of the hospice binder included a signed admission to hospice contract. 8/7/23 - Review of R13's care plan revealed a lack of evidence that a person centered care plan with interventions was developed for hospice services. 8/18/23 3:40 PM - During an interview E3 (UM) comfirmed R13's care plan lacked evidence that a person centered care plan with interventions was developed to identify that R13 was receiving hospice services. 2. Review of R82's clinical record revealed: 5/23/23 - A physician order was written to administer oxygen at 2-3 L/min (liters per minute) using…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-07 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interviews and record review, it was determined that for one (R15) out of twenty-six (26) residents reviewed for comprehensive care plans, the facility failed to provide R15 the opportunity to participate in his care plan meetings. Findings include: R15's clinical record revealed: 5/3/21 - R15 was admitted to the facility with a diagnosis of end-stage renal Disease, which required offsite dialysis three days a week. According to the clinical record, R15 was scheduled and transported for offsite dialysis every Monday, Wednesday and Friday (M/W/F). Review of E40's (Social Worker) care plan meeting notes revealed that R15 was Invited but not in attendance for the following dates: - 2/8/23 at 2:15 PM; - 5/3/23 at 10:30 AM; - 7/26/23 at 10:40 AM. Despite R15's scheduled dialysis days for M/W/F, the facility repetitively scheduled R15's care plan meetings on Wednesdays (2/8/23, 5/3/23 and 7/26/23). The facility failed to provide the resident with multiple opportunities to participate in his own care plan meetings. 8/15/23 at 9:02 AM - During an interview, R15 stated that he has…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-07 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review it was determined that for one (R60) out of five residents reviewed for ADL care provided for dependent residents, the facility failed to provide the necessary assistance to get OOB (out of bed). Findings include: 7/25/19 - R60 admitted to facility with diagnoses including stroke and persistent vegetative state. 10/11/22 - E33 (MD) ordered Resident (R60) is a total lift for all transfers. 10/12/22 - E33 (MD) ordered Heel protectors to bilateral feet at all times . 4/7/23 - E33 (MD) wrote OOB seating and positioning Clarification Order: patient to be positioned OOB in geri-chair, 3X/wk (three times per week) for 2-3 hours as tolerated. 8/14/23 1:14 PM - During a telephone interview, CG2 (R60's daughter) stated, I want her to sit in the chair. They don't get her OOB like they use to. CG2 stated that she believes the staff use a lift to get her OOB. 8/16/23 8:48 AM - R60 was lying in bed towards the left side (with pillow prop) with heel protectors on bilateral feet with pillow between her legs. 8/16/23 11:34 AM - R60 was lying in bed propped on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-07 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, it was determined that for two (R11 and R23) out of three residents reviewed for quality of care, the facility failed to ensure that each resident received treatment and care in accordance with the plan of care. Findings include: 1. Review of R11's clinical record revealed: 4/4/23 - R11 was readmitted to the facility. 9/28/23 - A physician note from P2 (MD) at a specialized eye hospital documented that R11 had viral conjunctivitis in the left eye and to follow up with the regular eye doctor or the cataract and primary eye care service in 3 to 6 weeks. The note also confirmed that R11's test results were consistent with glaucoma. The note further documents to follow up for glaucoma in 2 to 3 days for consideration of cataract extraction with insertion of intraocular lens. 9/30/23 2:01 PM - A nursing note documented a call was made to the eye clinic to follow-up with an appointment but there was no answer and the clinic was closed on the weekends. The facility lacked evidence of a follow-up appointment for R11. 11/28/23 2:35 PM - An interview with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-07 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, it was determined that for two (R82 and R243) out of two residents reviewed for respiratory care, the facility failed to provide professional standards of practice by ensuring the oxygen tubing and humidifier bottle was labeled and changed weekly. Findings include: 1. Review of R82's clinical record revealed: 1/8/23 - R82 was admitted to the facility. 1/14/23 - An admission MDS indicated R82 was cognitively intact and diagnoses of acute respiratory failure with hypoxia and COPD. 5/23/23 - A physician order was written to administer oxygen at 2-3 L/min (liters per minute) using a nasal cannula for drop in O2 (oxygen) saturations, keep above 92% PRN (as needed). 8/14/23 - An observation of R82's oxygen tubing revealed a label dated 7/22/23. 8/16/23 - A review of R82's physician orders revealed no order to change oxygen tubing. 8/16/23 10:18 AM - During an interview E3 (UM) stated that they haven't been changing the tubing because R82 hasn't been using it and she is PRN and the tubing was outdated. E3 reviewed the physician orders and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-09-07 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolatedEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review it was determined that the facility failed to develop and maintain policies and procedures for the Medication Regimen Review (MRR) that included time frames for the various steps in the process. Findings include: A review of the facility policy 6.1 Pharmacist Consultant Services dated 8/1/16, stated, POLICY- Residential Care Facilities with more than 10 beds shall retain the services of a pharmacist consultant no less than quarterly .PROCESS- 1. On a quarterly basis, the pharmacist consultant shall review: 1.1 Written policies and procedures for pharmaceutical services .1.4 Medication records, and initial and date the records when reviewed; 1.5 Adherence to stop orders; and 1.6 Staff performance in carrying out pharmaceutical policies and procedures. 2. The Pharmacist Consultant shall provide the Center Executive Director with a timely, written report of findings, with specific recommendations in each of the areas reviewed. This policy did not address the federally mandated time frames for the various steps in the MRR process. It did not address the steps the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-09-07 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolatedEnsure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, it was determined that for one (R5) out of six residents reviewed for medication review, the facility failed to ensure that R5's erythromycin eye ointment was not continued for an excessive duration after confirming no active infection in June 2023. Findings include: 8/19/20 - R5 was admitted to the facility. 4/5/23 - E22 (NP) ordered erythromycin ophthalmic ointment 5 mg (milligrams) /gm (gram) instill 1 drop in both eyes four times a day for conjunctivitis for 7 days for R5. The stop date listed for this order was 4/12/23. 4/20/23 - E27 (MD) restarted R5 on erythromycin ophthalmic ointment 5 mg/gm instill 1 drop in both eyes three times a day for chronic conjunctivitis. 5/7/23 4:24 PM - E27 documented in R5's Progress Note, .Vision issues have improved in general about both eyes Review of Systems: Sight has gradually gotten better by degree There is no mention of conjunctivitis/pink eye or it's treatment in E27's note. 6/2/23 - R5's Medication Regimen Review (MRR) recommended evaluation of erythromyocin eye drops (sic)as the order was missing…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-09-07 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, it was determined that for one of six residents reviewed for medication review, the facility failed to ensure that R91 was free from significant medication error. Findings include: Cross refer F711 and F773 Synjardy, which is the trade name for a fixed-dose combination anti-diabetic medication used to treat type 2 diabetes. It contains both empagliflozin and metformin and is taken by mouth. It is used to control high blood sugars in people with type 2 diabetes. Controlling high blood sugar helps prevent kidney damage, blindness, nerve problems, loss of limbs and sexual function problems. Proper control of diabetes reduces the patient's risk of stroke and heart attack. 6/5/23 - R91 admitted to an acute care rehabilitation center. 6/16/23 - R91 admitted to the facility with diagnoses including diabetes and aftercare following joint replacement therapy (recent full revision right total knee replacement on 5/31/23). 6/16/23 - R91 transferred from the acute care rehabilitation center to the nursing home (the facility). R91's Discharge Reconciliation…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-09-07 · tag F0773 — isolatedProvide or obtain laboratory tests/services when ordered and promptly tell the ordering practitioner of the results.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, it was determined, for four (R91, R102, R103 and R104) out of four residents sampled for laboratory services, the facility failed to promptly notify the ordering medical practitioner of laboratory results that fell outside of clinical reference ranges. In addition, the facility failed to have a policy and procedures, for notification of the practitioner, when laboratory results fall outside of the clinical reference range. Findings include: Cross refer F711 and F760 1. Review of R91's clinical record revealed: 6/16/23- R91 admitted to the facility with diagnoses including diabetes and aftercare following joint replacement therapy (recent full revision right total knee replacement on 5/31/23). Of note, 6/16/23 was a Friday. 6/16/23 - E33 (MD) gave a verbal order for a complete metabolic panel (CMP) and complete blood count (CBC) to be drawn. 6/17/23 7:50 AM - R91 had CMP and CBC labs drawn. 6/17/23 11:17 AM - R91's CMP and CBC lab results are reported to the facility with nine lab values marked as abnormal or not within the normal clinical range.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-09-07 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — isolatedEnsure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents received the selected food from the menu for one (R78) out of ten sampled residents for food investigation. Findings include: 8/16/23 11:40 AM - During a random dining observation of R78's lunch tray, the meal ticket did not match and R78 did not receive a dinner roll or fruit sherbet. 8/16/23 11:44 AM - An interview with E21 (CNA) confirmed that items are often missing from tray and she will walk down and get them. E21 confirmed the dinner roll and sherbet were missing from tray. 8/16/23 11:49 AM - The Surveyor observed E21 providing R78 a dinner roll and a container of fruit sherbet. 8/21/23 2:50 PM - Findings were reviewed with E1 (NHA), E2 (DON) and E3 (ADON).
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-07 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on interview, record review and review of other facility documentation it was determined that the facility failed to ensure, in accordance with professional standards and practices, that medical records for one (R82) out of twenty six (26) of the investigative sampled residents were accurate. Findings include: Review of R82's clinical record revealed: 1/8/23 - R82 was admitted to facility. 6/22/23 3:47 PM - A physician's order was written for Tramadol 50mg give 25 mg by mouth every 6 hours as needed for moderate to severe pain for R82. 8/18/23 - A review of R82's Individual Patient Controlled Record form for Tramadol lacked evidence of staff receiving the drug including date and time. 8/18/23 11:11 AM - An interview with E17 (LPN) and E3 (ADON/UM) confirmed that the facility lacked evidence of completing the Individual Patient Controlled Record for R82's Tramadol. 8/21/23 2:50 PM - Findings were reviewed with E1 (NHA), E2 (DON) and E3.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$192,384 in federal fines across 2 penalties. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.
- $33,933 — penalty dated 2024-09-24
- $158,451 — penalty dated 2023-09-07
- Medicare payment denial — starting 2023-12-16 for 3 days
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to GENESIS HEALTHCARE — 184 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 3 of 5 | 2.4 | +0.6 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 3 of 5 | 2.3 | +0.7 vs chain |
| Staffing | 4 of 5 | 2.5 | +1.5 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 3 of 5 | 3.5 | -0.5 vs chain |
The other 183 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.4★, per CMS)
Showing 40 of 183; lowest-rated first.
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GENESIS DE HOLDINGS LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 100% | since 04/01/2011 |
| FC-GEN OPERATIONS INVESTMENT LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 02/02/2015 |
| GEN OPERATIONS I LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 02/02/2015 |
| GEN OPERATIONS II LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 02/02/2015 |
| GENESIS HEALTHCARE INC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 02/02/2015 |
| GENESIS HEALTHCARE LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 02/02/2015 |
| GENESIS HOLDINGS LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 02/02/2015 |
| GENESIS OPERATIONS LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 01/28/2025 |
| GHC HOLDINGS LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 04/01/2011 |
| SUN HEALTHCARE GROUP INC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 02/02/2015 |
| WHITMAN, ARNOLD | Individual | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 02/02/2015 |
| BERG, MICHAEL | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 03/02/2015 |
| BRIDGEFORD, LAURA | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 06/01/2024 |
| MENDELSON, AVI | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 06/01/2024 |
| ERHART, CAROL | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/28/2025 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 17 rows in the source record cover these 15 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
10 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
About 80% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $1.5M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 11% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in DE
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Delaware Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 085015. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-09-09, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.