No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

St Andrews Health Campus

1400 Lammers Pike, Batesville, IN 47006 · For profit - Corporation · 66 certified beds · (812) 934-5090 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (812) 934-5090 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0758)
Insights

This home’s record is mixed — some reassuring signs, some worth asking about.

In its favor
  • a middle-of-the-pack inspection score (3/5)
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
  • lower-than-typical staff turnover (31% vs 45% nationally) — better care continuity
Worth asking about
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (15) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • CMS ownership filings flag it as owned by a private-equity firm or REIT — a category that performs worse on staffing on average, though that average says nothing certain about this home, and CMS filings undercount these ties, so other homes here may have them unflagged (what the research actually shows →)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

4/5
CMS overall
4 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 3 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 3 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 5 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
188 State Route 129 · (812) 934-6400 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
1198 State Road 46 E · (812) 932-6251 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
1736 Lammers Pike · (812) 932-1740 · Call to confirm hours
Park
716 S Park Ave · (812) 934-4560 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
407 N Township Line Rd · (812) 934-5192

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 5 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 5 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 5 to 4 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating4★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased8.4%11.0%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight0.0%5.5%5.4%check this — see note marked star below the table
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%0.4%0.9%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.0%1.1%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms3.6%25.2%6.5%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.0%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury0.6%3.9%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened4.7%11.9%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication38.2%23.5%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%95.4%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers4.7%3.6%4.7%typical
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control22.8%23.3%21.2%typical
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table7.6%13.6%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.0%1.2%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine98.7%79.0%79.4%better
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission19.7%22.2%22.6%better
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit6.9%10.8%12.0%better
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days0.961.611.67better
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days2.211.441.80worse

* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

57.7% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 107 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

57.7%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
11.3%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
77.8%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.27U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.08hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.14hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.05hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 77.8% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 72 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.27 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 39% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 3% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF57.7%CMS range 50.1–65.851.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF11.3%CMS range 7.9–15.410.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge77.8%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge73.6%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge56.9%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified98.9%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting100.0%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay2.2%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened0.0%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization5.5%CMS range 3.0–9.27.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.171.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

1.19
RN hours/ resident / day
0.28
LPN hours/ resident / day
1.92
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.39
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
1.07
RN hoursweekends
30.6%
Total nursing turnover
21.4%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 66 beds and averages 56.8 residents a day — about 86% occupied, or roughly 9 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.39 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 1.19 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.92 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.97 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.56 on weekdays — 17% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.24 to 1.07 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 31% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

7
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-01-15)
2
at the previous standard inspection (2024-12-16)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

15 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 5 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-01-15 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to store food items for residents appropriately related to expired foods for 1 of 2 kitchen observations. This deficient practice had the potential to affect 57 of 57 resident that reside in the facility. Findings include:During the initial kitchen tour and interview with the Dietary Manager (DM), on 01/08/2026 at 10:30 A.M., the following was observed: -Two plastic packages of sliced turkey deli meat with an expiration date of November 2025, were laying on the top shelf of a wheeled cart. The DM indicated it had been frozen and was recently thawed. They were going to use it for lunch. There was no date on the packages as to when the packages of turkey were thawed. The DM threw both packages in the garbage can, -The top white plate in the plate warmer had a large splatter of off-white colored debris with green specks on the surface of the plate, the DM placed it in the dirty dish area. The dry storage room contained the following: -One square plastic tub of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-15 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, interview, and observation, the facility failed to follow physician's orders related to hold parameters for medications and identify skin impairments in a timely manner for 3 of 17 residents reviewed for Quality of Care. (Residents 8, 52, and 43)Findings include:1.The clinical record for Resident 8 was reviewed on 01/09/2026 at 1:15 P.M. An Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 10/10/2025, indicated the resident was severely cognitively impaired. The resident's diagnoses included, but were not limited to, Parkinson's disease, hypertension, dementia, anxiety, and depression. The Electronic Medication Administration Record (EMAR) for November and December 2025, were provided by the Director of Nursing (DON) on 01/14/2026 at 1:05 P.M. The record indicated the resident had the following current physician's order: -Losartan, a cardiovascular medication, 25 milligrams (mg) once a day, between 6:00 A.M. and 10:00 A.M. The special instructions for the medication indicated the medication was to be held, not given, if the resident's systolic (top number)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-01-15 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow appropriate infection control guidelines related to indwelling urinary catheters for a resident with a Urinary Tract Infection (UTI) for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for urinary catheters / UTIs. (Resident 38)Findings include: On 01/13/2026 at 8:59 A.M., Resident 38 was observed in his room sitting in his recliner. The resident's indwelling urinary catheter tubing and drainage bag were hanging on the side of a waste basket next to the resident's chair. During an interview, on 01/13/2026 at 1:42 P.M., RN 12 indicated the resident currently had a UTI and would begin taking an antibiotic that day. On 01/13/2026 at 1:47 P.M., the resident was observed in his room sitting in his recliner. The resident's catheter tubing and drainage bag were laying on the floor near the resident's feet. On 01/13/2026 at 3:31 P.M., the resident was observed in his room sitting in his recliner. The resident's catheter tubing and drainage bag were laying on the floor near the resident's feet. On 01/13/2026 at 3:50 P.M., Certified…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-15 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to have medications available for a resident for 1 of 17 residents reviewed for pharmacy services. (Resident 4)Findings include:The clinical record for Resident 4 was reviewed on 01/09/2026 at 2:42 P.M. An admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 12/12/2025, indicated the resident was severely cognitively impaired. The resident's diagnoses included, but were not limited to, pressure ulcer, heart failure, hypertension, wound infection, diabetes, non-Alzheimer's dementia, malnutrition, and vascular dementia.A physician's order, dated 12/09/2025 through 12/10/2025, indicated the resident was to receive Lovenox (enoxaparin), 30 mg subcutaneously (an injection administered just under the skin), every 12 hours. The resident's December 2025 Electronic Medication Administration Record (EMAR) indicated the resident did not receive the medication on 12/09/2025, between 6:00 A.M. and 10:00 A.M., due to the medication being unavailable. A physician's order, dated 12/10/2025 through 12/25/2025, indicated the resident was to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-01-15 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to prevent a significant medication error related to an anticoagulant (blood thinner) medication for 1 of 7 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. (Resident 4)Findings include:The clinical record for Resident 4 was reviewed on 01/09/2026 at 2:42 P.M. An admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 12/12/2025, indicated the resident was severely cognitively impaired. The resident's diagnoses included, but were not limited to, pressure ulcer, heart failure, hypertension, wound infection, diabetes, non-Alzheimer's dementia, malnutrition, and vascular dementia. A Hospital Discharge summary, dated [DATE], indicated the resident was to receive Lovenox (enoxaparin), 90 milligrams (mg), subcutaneously (an injection administered just under the skin), every 12 hours. A physician's order, dated 12/09/2025 through 12/10/2025, indicated the resident was to receive enoxaparin, 30 mg every 12 hours.A Progress Note, dated 12/10/2025 at 7:37 A.M., indicated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-01-15 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to follow infection control guidelines related to Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) for 2 of 3 observations of high-contact resident care activities. (Residents 58 and 2) Findings include:1. Resident 58's clinical record was reviewed on 01/12/2026 at 11:00 A.M. A Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 12/05/2025, indicated the resident was severely cognitively impaired. The resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The resident's diagnoses included, but were not limited to, Alzheimer's dementia, diabetes, and stroke. The resident was at risk for pressure ulcers and had a Stage 3 (Full-thickness skin loss in which subcutaneous fat may be visible in the ulcer and granulation tissue was often present. Slough and/or eschar may be visible but does not obscure the depth of tissue loss) pressure ulcer that was present on admission/re-entry. The resident's current physician's orders included an open-ended order, with a start date…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-01-15 · tag F0947 — failed to train nurse aides adequately — isolated
    Ensure nurse aides have the skills they need to care for residents, and give nurse aides education in dementia care and abuse prevention.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure staff met the requirement of completing three hours of annual dementia training for 1 of 10 Nurse Aide/employee records reviewed. (Qualified Medication Aide/CNA 6)Findings include:The employee records were provided by the Employee Experience Manager (EXM) on 01/15/2026. The following staff member failed to have the required number of hours of annual dementia training:- QMA 6 was hired on 11/12/2021 and failed to have any current annual dementia training in her file for 2025. During an interview, on 01/15/2026 at 11:23 A.M., the Director of Nursing indicated the corporation recently changed training management systems. The facility could provide no documentation that indicated QMA 6 completed the annual dementia training in 2025.The current, undated facility policy, titled Training (Required/Personal Development) was provided by the EXM on 01/15/2026 at 11:12 A.M. The policy indicated, .Mandatory trainings are assigned annually to employees based on their role in the organization in order to comply with State and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-16 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to provide prescribed medications for 1 of 6 residents reviewed for pharmacy services. (Resident 40) Findings include: The clinical record for Resident 40 was reviewed on 12/11/24 at 11:24 A.M. An admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 10/02/24, indicated the resident was cognitively intact. The resident's diagnoses included, but were not limited to, Parkinson's disease, anxiety, and macular degeneration. The physician's orders were reviewed on 12/11/24 at 11:29 A.M., and included, but were not limited to, the following current order: - Brimonidine eye drops (used to lower fluid pressure in the eyes), one drop in the left eye three times a day at 7:30 A.M., 2:00 P.M., and 10:00 P.M., with a start date of 09/29/24. The November Electronic Medication Administration Record (EMAR) indicated the medication was not given and documented as unavailable on the following dates and times: - 11/24/24 at 10:00 P.M., - 11/25/24 at 7:30 A.M. and 2:00 P.M., - 11/26/24 at 7:30 A.M., 2:00 P.M., and 10:00 P.M., - 11/27/24 at 10:00…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-16 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolated
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to maintain residents' snack refrigerator related to unlabeled items for 1 of 1 resident snack refrigerators reviewed. (Health Center snack refrigerator) Findings include: The nourishment area in the Health Center was observed with Qualified Medication Aide (QMA) 2 on 12/16/24 at 9:17 A.M. The snack refrigerator contained the following: - Three lidded bowls that contained what looked like oats and milk that were labeled as belonging to a current resident in the facility. There were instructions for reheating the contents of the bowls. The bowls were not dated and QMA 2 was not sure when the items were brought into the facility. - A bag from a fast-food restaurant with a container of dried out french fries and a wrapped sandwich. The bottom of the bag was discolored from grease. A resident's nickname was written on the bag, but the bag was not labeled with a received-on date. - A white plastic bag from a fast-food restaurant with a half-eaten burrito bowl inside. The bag was not labeled in any way. - A Styrofoam cup of milk with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-11-06 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to notify the physician for a change in a resident's condition related to weights for 1 of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. (Resident 15) Findings include: The clinical record for Resident 15 was reviewed on 11/01/23 at 10:49 A.M. A Significant Change MDS (Minimum Data Set) assessment, dated 10/01/23, indicated the resident was cognitively intact. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, heart failure, hypertension, and peripheral vascular disease. The resident had taken medications that included, but was not limited to, a diuretic (water pill). The EMAR/ETAR (Electronic Medication Administration Record/Electronic Treatment Administration Record) for October and September 2023 related to the resident's weights were provided by the Scheduler on 11/03/23 at 11:38 A.M. The record indicated the resident was to be weighed weekly. The MD/NP (Nurse Practitioner) were to be notified if the resident gained three pounds or more in a week. The record included, but was not limited to, the following: - On…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 5 citations
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-06 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, interview, and observation, the facility failed to implement neurological checks (neurological assessments) following a fall and failed to follow appropriate guidelines for insulin pen usage for 2 of 17 residents reviewed for Quality of Care. (Residents 10 and 31) Findings include: 1. The clinical record for Resident 10 was reviewed on 11/03/23 at 2:47 P.M. A Quarterly MDS (Minimum Data Set) assessment, dated 08/10/23, indicated the resident was moderately cognitively impaired. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, Parkinson's disease and stroke. The resident had two or more falls with no injury and two or more falls with injuries that were not major since the previous assessment, dated 06/26/23. The Progress Notes were provided by the DON (Director of Nursing) on 11/06/23 at 10:54 A.M., and included, but were not limited to, the following: - A note, dated 10/19/23 at 9:41 P.M., indicated the resident was observed on the floor in his room, lying on his left side. - An IDT (Interdisciplinary Team) note dated 10/23/23 at 8:24 A.M., indicated the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-11-06 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview, observation, and record review, the facility failed to follow the physician's orders for a dressing change to a pressure ulcer for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for wound care. (Resident 43) Findings include: During an interview on 11/02/23 at 10:47 A.M., LPN (Licensed Practical Nurse) 2 reviewed Resident 43's wound dressing change order and indicated they were to cleanse the left inner ankle area, pat dry, apply Santyl ointment (a prescription medication that removes dead tissue) to the wound bed, and cover with a foam dressing. The dressing was to be changed daily. Wound care for Resident 43 was observed on 11/02/23 at 10:58 A.M., with LPN 2. The nurse prepared the dressing change supplies and followed appropriate infection control guidelines. The nurse removed the soft foam boot that was protecting the resident's left ankle, removed their sock, and removed the old dressing that was dated 10/31. There was a small amount of drainage on the old dressing. The wound, located on the left inner ankle bony prominence, was the size of a pencil eraser. The nurse proceeded…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-11-06 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to follow a physician's order for daily weights related to edema for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for hydration. (Resident 52) Findings include: The clinical record for Resident 52 was reviewed on 11/01/23 at 10:46 A.M. An admission MDS (Minimum Data Set) assessment, dated 10/20/23, indicated the resident was cognitively intact. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, metabolic encephalopathy, lymphedema, cardiomegaly, anxiety, and depression. An NP (Nurse Practitioner) Progress Note, dated 10/23/23, indicated the resident was being seen for post seven-day admission follow-up. The assessment and plan included but was not limited to, .Edema: Start HCTZ (Hydrochlorothiazide) 25 mg (milligrams) daily x (times) 3 days and daily weight . The clinical record lacked indication the resident was weighed daily from 10/24/23 through 11/03/23. During an interview on 11/03/23 at 10:47 A.M., LPN (Licensed Practical Nurse) 5 indicated CNAs (Certified Nurse Aides) and nursing staff obtained residents' weights. If there was an order for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-11-06 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to follow a physician's order related to a gradual dose reduction of an antipsychotic for 1 of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. (Resident 26) Findings include: The clinical record for Resident 26 was reviewed on 11/01/23 at 9:56 A.M. A Quarterly MDS (Minimum Data Set) assessment, dated 09/06/23, indicated the resident was cognitively intact. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, hypertension, non-Alzheimer dementia, Parkinson's disease, anxiety, and psychotic disorder. A Behavior Management Team Gradual Dosage Reduction Recommendation, dated 03/28/23, indicated the resident was currently taking Seroquel (an antipsychotic medication) 12.5 mg (milligrams) every day. The consideration was given to gradual dose reduction to discontinue the Seroquel at that time. The form was signed by the Nurse Practitioner the same day. A facility Gradual Dose Reduction (GDR) Circumstance was started on 03/29/23 indication the resident Seroquel 12.5 mg every day was GDR' d. The form indicated the resident's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-11-06 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store medications appropriately related labeling medication and having unsecured loose tablets in the medication carts for 2 of 3 medication carts reviewed. (The 100 Hall Medication Cart and the 200 Hall Medication Cart) Findings include: 1. The 100 Hall Medication Cart was observed on 11/06/23 at 10:15 A.M., with RN 3. The Cart contained the following loose pills laying in the bottom of the drawers: - two small yellow oval tablets, and - one small white oval tablet, During an interview on 11/06/23 at 10:16 A.M., RN 3 indicated there should not be any loose pills in the medication cart. 2. The 200 Hall Medication Cart was observed on 11/06/23 at 9:58 A.M., with LPN (Licensed Practical Nurse) 4. The Cart contained the following: - a bottle of Refresh eye drops with no resident name and no opened date. During an interview on 11/06/23 at 9:59 A.M., LPN 4 indicated all medication in the medication cart should be labeled with the resident's name and have an opened date. The current facility policy titled,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to TRILOGY HEALTH SERVICES — 123 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 4 of 54.2-0.2 vs chain
Health inspection 3 of 53.5-0.5 vs chain
Staffing 3 of 53.3-0.3 vs chain
Quality measures 5 of 54.8+0.2 vs chain
The other 122 homes this chain runs (chain average 4.2★, per CMS)
1 of 5Heritage TheFindlay, OH 1 of 5The Oaks Rehabilitation and Healthcare CenterZanesville, OH 2 of 5Homewood Health CampusLebanon, IN 2 of 5Violet Springs Health CampusPickerington, OH 2 of 5Woodmont Health CampusBoonville, IN 3 of 5Cobblestone Crossings Health CampusTerre Haute, IN 3 of 5Creasy Springs Health CampusLafayette, IN 3 of 5Cumberland Pointe Health CampusWest Lafayette, IN 3 of 5Forest Park Health CampusRichmond, IN 3 of 5Franciscan Health Care CenterLouisville, KY 3 of 5Greenleaf Health CampusElkhart, IN 3 of 5River Terrace Health CampusMadison, IN 3 of 5Scenic Hills At The MonasteryFerdinand, IN 3 of 5Smiths Mill Health CampusNew Albany, OH 3 of 5Springhurst Health CampusGreenfield, IN 3 of 5Springs Of Richmond, TheRichmond, IN 3 of 5St Mary Healthcare CenterLafayette, IN 3 of 5Stonegate Health CampusLapeer, MI 3 of 5Sun Prairie Senior LivingSun Prairie, WI 3 of 5Taylor Springs Health CampusGahanna, OH 3 of 5The Willows at Fritz FarmLexington, KY 3 of 5The Willows at HamburgLexington, KY 3 of 5The Willows at HarrodsburgHarrodsburg, KY 3 of 5The Willows at SpringhurstLouisville, KY 3 of 5Villages At Oak Ridge, TheWashington, IN 3 of 5Waunakee Valley Senior LivingWaunakee, WI 3 of 5Wellbrooke Of CarmelCarmel, IN 4 of 5Arlington Place Health CampusIndianapolis, IN 4 of 5Ashford Place Health CampusShelbyville, IN 4 of 5Aspen Place Health CampusGreensburg, IN 4 of 5Avalon Springs Health CampusValparaiso, IN 4 of 5Bethany Pointe Health CampusAnderson, IN 4 of 5Blair Ridge Health CampusPeru, IN 4 of 5Bridgepointe Health CampusVincennes, IN 4 of 5Cedar Creek Health CampusLowell, IN 4 of 5Clearvista Lake Health CampusIndianapolis, IN 4 of 5Forest Springs Health CampusLouisville, KY 4 of 5Glen Oaks Health CampusNew Castle, IN 4 of 5Glen Ridge Health CampusLouisville, KY 4 of 5Meadows Of Delphos TheDelphos, OH

Showing 40 of 122; lowest-rated first.

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Investor-owned

CMS ownership filings flag an owner of this facility as a real-estate investment trust (REIT). That’s a fact worth knowing: peer-reviewed research links private-equity and REIT ownership to lower staffing and more citations on average — though any individual home can run well or poorly regardless. Read the inspection and staffing record above on its own merits.

  • TRILOGY REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST — REIT · 100.00% share · 5% Or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest

Source: CMS SNF ownership filings (PECOS). These flags are self-reported and undercount — federal auditors (GAO) and researchers find CMS captures only a fraction of true private-equity and REIT ties, so the absence of a flag on other homes is not proof they lack investor owners. How investor ownership affects care →

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
HARRISON COUNTY HOSPITALOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 09/23/2005
TRILOGY PROPERTY HOLDINGS LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 12/01/2015
TRILOGY HEALTHCARE MASTER TENANT LLCOrganizationINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFsince 08/21/2025
AMERICAN HEALTHCARE REIT INCOrganization5% OR GREATER MORTGAGE INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFsince 10/01/2018
CONTINENTAL MERGER SUB LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER MORTGAGE INTERESTsince 10/01/2021
LUMENT REAL ESTATE CAPITAL LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER MORTGAGE INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2023
BODNEY, STEPHENIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; TRUSTEE OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2022
BROWN, RICHARDIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; TRUSTEE OF THE SNFsince 06/15/1991
HESS, JUDYIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; CORPORATE DIRECTOR; TRUSTEE OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2016
SHICKLES, LARRYIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; TRUSTEE OF THE SNFsince 02/01/2022
SHIREMAN, KATHYIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; CORPORATE DIRECTOR; TRUSTEE OF THE SNFsince 05/01/2014
WHITIS, HARRISIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; TRUSTEE OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2021
WISEMAN, MARKIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; TRUSTEE OF THE SNFsince 09/01/2021
CLUNIE, LISAIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 01/08/2022
TRILOGY HEALTHCARE OF BATESVILLE, LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 11/01/2020
TRILOGY HEALTHCARE OPERATIONS OF BATESVILLE LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 11/01/2020
CRAIG, KEVINIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/03/2020
JOHNSON, JOHNIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 04/15/2025
BARNEY, LEIGHIndividualLIMITED PARTNERSHIP INTEREST; INDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNFsince 08/21/2025
DAVIS, DAVIDIndividualLIMITED PARTNERSHIP INTERESTsince 12/31/2019
PARAGON OUTPATIENT REHABILITATION SERVICES LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 12/01/2015
TRILOGY MANAGEMENT SERVICES LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 12/01/2015

CMS files one row per role, so the 39 rows in the source record cover these 22 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

10 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$10.1M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
+12.6%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$1.2M
Related-party expense14% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 26%Medicare 10%Other / private 64%

This home reported $1.2M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 14% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$285per resident / day
operating cost
$8,667per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$326per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in IN

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Indiana Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Indiana
$8,943/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$10,326/mo
Nursing home (private)
$5,639/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 155742. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-01-15, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next