Clearvista Lake Health Campus

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

63.5% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 158 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 60.6% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 71 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.52 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 83% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 12% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 70 beds and averages 48.2 residents a day — about 69% occupied, or roughly 22 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.75 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.83 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.91 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.05 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.03 on weekdays — 24% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.94 to 0.56 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 50% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

27 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 16 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · G2023-08-22 · tag F0790 — failed to provide dental care — isolated
  Provide routine and 24-hour emergency dental care for each resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to timely assist in arranging emergency dental services for a resident with an abscessed tooth resulting in a delay of dental services for the abscessed tooth which was painful and infected 1 of 1 Resident reviewed for Dental (Resident 2). Findings include: The clinical record for Resident 2 was reviewed on 8/16/23 at 1:30 p.m. The Resident's diagnosis included, but were not limited to, dementia and dysphagia (difficulty swallowing). She was admitted from an acute care hospital to the facility on 7/7/23. Resident 2 resided in the facilities attached memory care assisted living prior to her hospitalization. A nursing progress note, dated 7/9/23 at 6:17 p.m., indicated a family member informed staff member that Resident 2 was to have oral surgery prior to her hospitalization. Resident 2 had multiple teeth which needed extracted. A follow up appointment needed to be scheduled as soon as possible. An assessment of Resident 2 revealed pain to…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-01-12 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure monitoring of the dishwasher sanitation and maintain clean kitchen flooring. This had a potential to effect 44 of 44 residents that reside in the skilled facility. Findings include: An observation of the kitchen was made with the Dietary Manager (DM) on 1/5/26 at 9:43 a.m. The dishwasher was observed during washing and rinsing cycles. The DM had indicated she had been having trouble with the dishwasher for several months. The service technician had been out to service the machine. The dish machine was a high temperature dishwasher, but with the problems it was having the service technician recommended using it as a low temperature dishwasher until replacement. The dishwasher has been working as a low temperature dishwasher for a couple months. The staff were currently utilizing chemical strips to ensure the sanitation was appropriate. The staff use an electronic charting to document the washing and sanitation temperatures. At that time, [NAME] 5 indicated he checks the dishwasher sanitation nightly.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-12 · tag F0554 — isolated
  Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a self medication assessment was completed timely for 2 of 2 residents randomly observed for self medication (Residents 4 and 14)Findings include: 1 The clinical record for Resident 14 was reviewed on 1/5/26 at 10:20 a.m. The resident's diagnosis included, but was not limited to, hypertension. On 1/5/26 at 10:20 a.m., Resident 14 was observed in her room sitting in her wheelchair. A plastic medication cup with 4 pills inside of it was sitting on her overbed table. Resident 14 indicated the nurse had left her medication for her to take. She then put the 4 pills into her mouth and swallowed them with a drink of water. Resident 14 indicated the nurses' usually left her medication for her to take when she was ready. A Self Administration of Medication Assessment, dated 1/5/26 at 12:51 p.m., indicated Resident 14 could self administer all oral medications and that her medications would be kept on the medication cart. The resident's self administration of medication assessment was conducted after the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-12 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure a safe method of transfer for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for falls. (Resident 1) Findings include: The clinical record for Resident 1 was reviewed on 1/5/26 at 1:30 p.m. The diagnoses for Resident 1 included, but were not limited to, vascular dementia, muscle weakness, rheumatoid arthritis and osteoporosis (bone disease that causes bones to become weak, thin and brittle). A Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], indicated Resident 1 needed staff to provide half of the assistance with lifting, holding, and trunk or limb support for the resident in a lying to a sitting position. The staff needed to provide all assistance with lifting, hold and trunk or limb support for the resident sitting to standing position and bed to chair positioning. A fall care plan, dated 2/19/25, indicated Resident 1 was a fall risk related to muscle weakness and dementia. The interventions included but were not limited to, start date: 2/19/25, staff to assist…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-12 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
  Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to timely notify a physician of a resident with pain, timely receive scheduled pain medications from the pharmacy, and to assess pain level, location of pain, and non-pharmacological interventions attempted prior to administering prn medications for 2 of 2 residents reviewed for pain. (Residents 26 and 63) Findings include: 1. The clinical record for Resident 63 was reviewed on 1/5/26 at 1:54 p.m. The resident's diagnosis included, but were not limited to, back pain and lumbar post-laminectomy syndrome (persistent pain or neurological symptoms in the back or extremities after spinal surgery). She was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident 63 had an intrathecal pain pump (device that delivers pain medication to the fluid around the spinal cord) which delivered hydromorphone (narcotic pain medication) due to chronic pain. A physician's order, dated 12/26/25, indicated she was to receive cyclobenzaprine (Flexeril muscle relaxer) 10 mg tablet three…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-12 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to apply TED hose (stockings that help prevent blood clots and swelling in the legs) as ordered for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for edema and to hold blood pressure medication, as ordered by the physician, for 2 of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. (Resident 3, Resident 9, and Resident 13) Findings include: 1. The clinical record for Resident 13 was reviewed on 11/7/24 at 10:53 a.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, edema. A care plan, dated 9/23/24, indicated the resident was to wear TED hose to her legs. A physician order, dated 9/17/24, indicated the staff was to apply TED hose to the resident's legs in the morning and remove them at night. Observations were made of Resident 13 on 11/7/24 at 10:53 a.m., 11/7/24 at 2:15 p.m., 11/8/24 at 9:38 a.m., and 11/8/24 at 1:21 p.m. The resident was observed wearing shoes, but she was not wearing TED hose. An observation was made of Resident 13 in her room with Certified Resident Care Associate (CRCA) 5 on 11/8/24 at 1:23 p.m. The resident was…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-12 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
  Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident's pain was assessed for severity of her pain for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for catheter. (Resident 25) Findings include: The clinical record for Resident 25 was reviewed on 11/6/24 at 12:20 p.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, diabetes mellitus with diabetic polyneuropathy. A care plan for pain, dated 12/18/23, indicated At risk for pain r/t [related to] diabetic polyneuropathy, depression, repeated falls. The approach included, but was not limited to, observe for and record verbal and non-verbal signs of pain. A physician order, dated 10/2/24, indicated the staff was to administer five milligrams of oxycodone prior to wound care once a day as needed. A physician order, dated 11/5/24, indicated the staff was to cleanse wounds on Resident 25's right and left heels with anasept (wound cleanser); apply skin prep to peri-wounds; apply collagen to wound beds; cover with absorbent dressings; and wrap with kerlix and secure with tape. The dressing changes were scheduled for…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-11-12 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the medication and/or supply storage rooms did not contain expired supplies for 1 of 2 medication rooms observed and 1 of 2 central supply rooms observed. Findings include: An observation was conducted of the central supply room on [NAME] unit with the Director of Nursing (DON) on 11/7/24 at 9:40 a.m. There were 16 cartons of Osmolite 1.5 (feeding solution) with an expiration date of 11/1/24. The DON indicated the facility did not have any residents currently receiving Osmolite 1.5. The Scheduler was responsible for supply storage. An observation was conducted, on 11/7/24 at 9:55 a.m., of the medication storage room on the Hinkle unit with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) 2. A cabinet contained ten COVID tests that had expired in 2023. A policy titled MEDICATION STORAGE IN THE FACILITY, revised 11/18, was provided by the DON on 11/7/24 at 1:48 p.m. The policy indicated the following, .E. The medication administration personnel will…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-12 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
  Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents' medical records were complete and accurate with behavior monitoring and documentation of urine characteristics after insertion of a Foley catheter for 2 of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications and 1 of 3 residents reviewed for catheters. (Residents' 11, 25, and 26) Findings include: 1a. The clinical record for Resident 25 was reviewed on 11/6/24 at 12:20 p.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, diabetes mellitus with diabetic polyneuropathy and obstructive and reflux uropathy (blocks the flow of urine). A physician order, dated 5/8/24, indicated the staff was to change the resident's Foley catheter every 30 days. The November 2024 Treatment Administration Record indicated the resident's Foley catheter was changed on 11/8/24. A nursing progress note, dated 11/8/24, indicated the following, Anchored 16 FR [French] 10 cc [cubic centimeter] bulb catheter change for the month. Resident tolerated it well. Resident 25's clinical record did not include characteristics of the resident's…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-12 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure infection control was maintained with hand hygiene during Foley catheter care for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for catheters. (Resident 3) Findings include: The clinical record for Resident 3 was reviewed on 11/7/24 at 11:00 a.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, neuromuscular dysfunction of bladder and stage 3 kidney disease. A care plan, dated 6/10/24, indicated the Resident uses a suprapubic or Foley catheter for dx [diagnosis] of: Neurogenic Bladder. The approaches included, but were not limited to, Provide assist with catheter care and change Foley catheter per physician orders. A physician order, dated 6/10/24, indicated the staff was to provide catheter care to Resident 3 three times a day. An observation was conducted of Foley catheter care with Certified Resident Care Associate (CRCA) 3 and the Director of Nursing on 11/12/24 at 1:43 p.m. CRCA 3 was observed washing his hands and donning on gloves prior to catheter care. Then, he turned on the faucet, filled a basin of water and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-11-12 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — isolated
  Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based in observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure resident rooms were in good repair for 2 of 3 resident rooms reviewed for environment (Resident 15 and 29). Findings include: 1a. Resident 15's room was observed on 11/7/24 at 9:51 a.m. The drywall behind her bed had been patched. The area was unpainted and appeared bumpy and uneven. On 11/12/24 at 2:28 p.m., Resident 15's room was observed with the Executive Director (ED). The ED indicated the drywall behind Resident 15's bed had been patched. The wall had been repaired multiple times. Resident 15 utilized a trapeze to assist with bed mobility and the trapeze stand caused the drywall to become scratched. 1b. Resident 29's room was observed on 11/7/24 at 11:00 a.m. The wall behind his bed had an irregularly shaped white area present on it. On 11/12/24 at 2:40 p.m., Resident 29's room was observed with the ED and the Director of Plant Operations (DOP). The DOP indicated the white area on the wall behind the bed was from the bed scraping against the wall. The paint had been worn away. The DOP was unsure…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to TRILOGY HEALTH SERVICES — 123 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 28 rows in the source record cover these 26 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

13 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $1.1M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 11% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in IN