No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Violet Springs Health Campus

603 Diley Road, Pickerington, OH 43147 · For profit - Corporation · 58 certified beds · (614) 751-6413 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (614) 751-6413 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse-prevention, restraint, or reporting citations — no harm found (F0604, F0605, F0609) — most recent Jan 20261 actual-harm citation1 immediate-jeopardy citation CMS recorded as corrected before the inspection ended (past non-compliance)$16,801 in federal fines
Insights

The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.

Worth asking about
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0604, F0605, F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • it has 1 actual-harm citation
  • inspectors recorded 1 serious finding as past non-compliance — the problem was found, fixed, and verified before the survey closed, so it is history rather than a current condition, but it is still worth asking what changed
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (36) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $16,801 in federal fines (most recent 2024-03-12)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
  • CMS ownership filings flag it as owned by a private-equity firm or REIT — a category that performs worse on staffing on average, though that average says nothing certain about this home, and CMS filings undercount these ties, so other homes here may have them unflagged (what the research actually shows →)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

2/5
CMS overall
2 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 2 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 3 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 4 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
1045 Hill Rd N · (614) 328-0341 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
845 Hill Rd N · (614) 920-3330 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
Kroger0.3 mi
1045 Hill Rd N · (614) 759-2761 · Call to confirm hours
Park
Typically dawn to dusk

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 4 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 4 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 4 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 4 to 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating2★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased7.4%5.3%15.4%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight7.4%6.2%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder1.3%0.2%0.9%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.0%0.4%2.0%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms2.6%30.1%6.5%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained4.4%0.1%0.1%worse
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury2.2%3.2%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened9.7%6.1%16.1%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication18.8%25.5%18.9%typical
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine96.4%94.5%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers5.2%3.4%4.7%worse
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control15.8%21.4%21.2%better
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table1.9%8.8%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication1.3%1.2%1.4%typical
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine85.7%75.6%79.4%typical
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission22.6%24.9%22.6%typical
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit12.7%12.9%12.0%typical
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days3.411.731.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days2.191.801.80worse

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

67.5% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 227 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

67.5%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
10.2%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
54.5%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.58U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.30hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.19hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.09hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 54.5% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 110 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.58 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 87% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 7% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF67.5%CMS range 60.9–74.151.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024better than U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF10.2%CMS range 7.7–13.510.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge54.5%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge56.4%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge47.3%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting99.1%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge90.5%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened0.6%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization8.8%CMS range 5.6–13.47.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.181.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.86
RN hours/ resident / day
1.13
LPN hours/ resident / day
1.76
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.75
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.49
RN hoursweekends
39.7%
Total nursing turnover
23.1%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 58 beds and averages 54.1 residents a day — about 93% occupied, or roughly 4 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.75 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.86 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.76 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.36 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.90 on weekdays — 14% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.01 to 0.49 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 40% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

16
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-01-20)
8
at the previous standard inspection (2024-10-17)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

36 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 24 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2024-03-12 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY THE FOLLOWING DEFICIENCY REPRESENTS AN INCIDENT OF PAST NONCOMPLIANCE THAT WAS SUBSEQUENTLY CORRECTED PRIOR TO THIS SURVEY. Based on closed medical record review, review of emergency medical services (EMS) records, review of hospital records, review of video footage, interviews with facility staff, the coroner, law enforcement and restaurant owner, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure Resident #51 was provided a safe environment, adequate supervision and assistance during an outing to prevent a fall down a flight of stairs. This resulted in Immediate Jeopardy when Resident #51, who was assessed to have unspecified dementia/ severe cognitive impairment, was at moderate risk for falls and utilized a motorized wheelchair for mobility entered a restaurant on a facility planned community outing, maneuvered her motorized wheelchair without staff assistance, and then drove the wheelchair down 18 stairs resulting in the resident sustaining numerous injuries/fractures. The resident subsequently…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2025-06-12 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on closed medical record review, hospital record review, review of an Emergency Medical Services (EMS) run report, staff interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to timely and adequately identify an acute change in medical condition resulting in a delay in medical intervention/hospital care for Resident #54 resulting in the resident being found unresponsive and requiring cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR). Actual harm occurred beginning during the night shift on [DATE] when staff failed to identify an acute change in Resident #54's condition to ensure timely and adequate medical intervention was provided. At 6:00 A.M. Resident #54 sustained an unwitnessed fall. Resident #54 had an emesis (vomiting) and voiced complaints of not feeling well. The resident did not consume any breakfast and continued vomiting. At approximately 8:00 A.M., Certified Nurse Practitioner (CNP) #521 ordered intravenous (IV) fluids to be given to the resident; however, the IV fluids were not initiated until…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-01-20 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — pattern
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, interviews and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure three residents (#65, #79 and #93) who were dependent on staff received appropriate grooming. Additionally, the facility failed to ensure one resident (#91) who required assistance from staff received routine bathing. This affected four residents (#65, #79, #91 and #93) of four residents received for activities of daily living (ADL). The facility census was 54.Findings Include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #91 revealed an initial admission date of 01/06/26 with the diagnoses including but not limited to hypertension, hyperlipidemia, prediabetes, severe tricuspid regurgitation, cardiomegaly with aortic arch calcifications, purulent cellulitis of left lower extremity, atrial fibrillation and congestive heart failure. Review of the resident's admission life enrichment assessment dated [DATE] revealed it was very important to the resident to choose between a tub bath, shower, bed bath or sponge…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-01-20 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — pattern
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure one resident (#52) who was utilizing a c-pap machine had a physician's order for the use of the c-pap machine. Additionally, the facility failed to ensure one resident (#93) received oxygen therapy as physician ordered and failed to store nebulizer medication delivery systems appropriately for two residents (#41 and #43). This affected four residents (#41, #43, #52 and #93) of four residents reviewed for respiratory care and treatment. The facility census was 54.Findings Include:1. Review of the medical record for Resident #93 revealed an initial admission date of 01/10/26 with the diagnoses including but not limited to acute respiratory failure, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), atherosclerotic heart disease, severe morbid obesity. right bundle branch block, bifascicular block, ventricular tachycardia, gout, Parkinson's disease, benign prostatic hyperplasia, hyperlipidemia, hypothyroidism, constipation and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-01-20 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — pattern
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview the facility failed to ensure Resident #86, #88, #91, and #93's medical record reflected their diagnoses and failed to document Resident #91's treatment time accurately. This affected four residents (#86, #88, #91, and #93) of 24 records reviewed. The facility census was 54.Findings include: 1.Review of Resident #86's medical record revealed an admission date of 01/02/26 his face sheet and diagnosis page in the electronic medical record did not indicate his diagnoses. Review of Resident #86's hospital discharge summary 01/02/26 revealed diagnoses including hypertension, dementia, and chronic kidney disease. Interview on 01/14/26 at 9:50 A.M. with the Director of Nursing (DON) verified the resident's medical record was missing their diagnoses. A policy for medical records was requested but not provided. 2. Review of Resident #88's medical record revealed an admission date of 01/05/26 his face sheet and diagnosis page in the electronic medical record did not indicate his diagnoses. Review of Resident #88's hospital history and physical dated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-01-20 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, interviews and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure one resident (#91) was bathed according to their preference. This affected one resident (#91) of four residents reviewed for activities of daily living (ADL). The facility census was 54.Findings Include:Review of the medical record for Resident #91 revealed an initial admission date of 01/06/26 with the diagnoses including but not limited to hypertension, hyperlipidemia, prediabetes, severe tricuspid regurgitation, cardiomegaly with aortic arch calcifications, purulent cellulitis of left lower extremity, atrial fibrillation and congestive heart failure. Review of the resident's admission life enrichment assessment dated [DATE] revealed it was very important to the resident to choose between a tub bath, shower, bed bath or sponge bath. The resident indicated she preferred to receive showers. Review of the profile care guide dated 01/08/26 revealed see shower schedule for showers. The resident was to receive…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-01-20 · tag F0604 — failed to not use physical restraints improperly — isolated
    Ensure that each resident is free from the use of physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and review of facility policy the facility failed to regularly assess and obtain a physician order for a restraint for Resident #8. This affected one resident (#8) of one resident reviewed for restraints. The facility census was 54.Findings include:Review of Resident #8's medical record revealed an admission date of 01/15/21 with diagnoses including epilepsy, unspecified mood disorder, expressive language disorder, unspecified convulsions, and age-related osteoporosis. Review of Resident #8's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident had moderately impaired cognition. She had a trunk restraint that was used daily.Review of Resident #8's plan of care revised 11/17/25 revealed the resident was requesting a seatbelt to wheelchair, a physical restraint due to unable to independently released when in chair. Interventions included using seatbelt when in motorized wheelchair for safety and positioning and release per resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-01-20 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolated
    Prevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure psychotropic medications used on an as needed basis (prn) were limited to 14 days, unless the prescribing physician and/ or advanced level provider documented a rationale in the medical record and indicated the duration for the prn order. This affected one resident (#45) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. Findings include:Review of Resident #45's medical record revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Her diagnoses included Alzheimer's disease, dementia, major depressive disorder, and anxiety disorder. Review of Resident #45's progress notes revealed the resident was seen by the nurse practitioner on 10/29/25 following a hospitalization for a pulmonary embolism. She was also known to have severe Alzheimer's dementia with anxiety, which was a chronic illness, and indicated to be stable. She was receiving Buspirone (an anti-anxiety medication) 10 mg three times a day, Duloxetine (an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-01-20 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolated
    Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, medical record review, review of activity calendar, and review of policies revealed the facility failed to provide preferred independent activities to Resident #86, and failed to provide evidence Resident #49 and Resident #86 were invited to or attended group activities. This affected two residents (#49 and #86) of two residents reviewed for activities. The facility census was 54. Findings include:1.Review of Resident #49's medical record revealed an admission date of 12/16/25 with diagnoses including unspecified mood disorder, pulmonary fibrosis, hypothyroidism, depression, anxiety, dementia, and hypertension.Review of Resident #49's comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed she had severely impaired cognition.Review of Resident #49's life enrichment assessment dated [DATE] revealed it was very important for the resident to listen to music (country was her favorite), be around animals, keep up with the news, do things with groups, participate in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-20 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation, interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure a resident with non-pressure wounds had wound treatments provided timely as per physician's orders and another resident received treatment to dry, flaky skin from eczema as per physician's orders. This affected two residents (#65 and #93) of four residents reviewed for non-pressure skin conditions. Findings include:1. Review of Resident #65's medical record revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. His diagnoses included a complete rotator cuff tear or rupture of the right shoulder, encounter for other orthopedic aftercare, sprain of the ligaments of his cervical spine, displaced fracture of the middle phalanx of the left middle finger, non-displaced transverse fracture of the right patella, Parkinson's disease, tremors, primary osteoarthritis of the bilateral hips, anxiety disorder, and depression. Review of Resident #65's physician's orders revealed he had orders in place to apply Betamethasone…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-01-20 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observations, and interviews, the facility failed to identify, assess, and implement interventions to prevent pressure ulcers for Resident #40, and failed to ensure pressure relieving interventions were in place for Resident #91. This affected two residents (#40 and #91) of the three residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. The facility census was 54.Findings include:1.Review of the medical record for Resident #40 revealed an admission date of 08/26/25 and re-entry date of 11/20/25 with diagnoses to include but not limited to hypertensive heart disease with heart failure, acute on chronic diastolic heart failure, pulmonary fibrosis, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, hypothyroidism, unspecified fall, laceration without foreign body of right upper arm, urinary tract infection, phlebitis and thrombophlebitis, osteoporosis, and anxiety disorder. Review of the care plan for Resident #40 dated 09/04/25 revealed the resident was at risk for skin breakdown related to dementia,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-01-20 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation, and interviews, the facility failed to provide double portions as ordered for Resident #3 and failed to provide adequate meal assistance and hydration for Resident #79. This affected two residents (#3 and #79) of the seven residents reviewed for nutrition. The facility census was 54.Findings include:1. Review of the medical record for Resident #3 revealed an initial admission date of 11/12/25 with the diagnoses including but not limited to metabolic encephalopathy, sepsis due to enterococcus, severe sepsis with septic shock, urinary tract infection, multiple myeloma in remission, severe protein malnutrition, pleural effusion, dry eye syndrome, bariatric surgery status, hypothyroidism, hypotension, anxiety disorder, depression, obstructive sleep apnea, hyperlipidemia, Review of the plan of care dated 11/17/25 revealed the resident required increased caloric, protein, and/or nutrient needs related to presence of impaired skin integrity. Interventions included dietitian to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 24 citations
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-20 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure their medication error rate did not exceed 5%. The facility had two errors out of 30 opportunities for a medication error rate of 6.6%. This affected one resident (#61) of three residents reviewed for medication administration observations. Findings include: On 01/14/26 at 7:55 A.M., an observation of the medication administration pass revealed Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #330 was intending to administer the morning medications for Resident #58 that were due between the hours of 6:00 A.M. and 10:00 A.M. LPN #330 had pulled the medications out of the medication administration cart for Resident #58 that included numerous tablets/ capsules for the resident, as well as a Lidocaine 4% patch. She approached the resident that was in the back left corner of the room and informed her that she had her morning medications to give her. The resident was sleeping, but aroused easily when spoken to. LPN #330 informed the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-20 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observations, and interviews, the failed to ensure medications were not kept at bedside without orders for Resident #21 and #43. This affected two residents (#21 and #43) of the three residents reviewed for medications. This facility census was 54.Findings include:1. Review of the medical record for Resident #43 revealed an admission date of 07/15/20 with a re-entry date of 03/04/25 with diagnoses to include but not limited to chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia, chronic respiratory failure with hypercapnia, morbid (severe) obesity due to excess calories, anxiety disorder, cellulitis of abdominal wall, type two diabetes mellitus with chronic kidney disease stage 3, hypertensive heart disease, and shortness of breath. Review of the quarterly MDS dated [DATE] revealed a BIMS of 12 which indicated moderate cognitive impairment. No current self-administration of medication evaluation was documented for Resident #43. Review of the care plan dated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-01-20 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — isolated
    Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and medical record review the facility failed to prepare a vegetarian menu in advance and follow the menu for Resident #85. This affected one resident (#85) of five residents reviewed for dining. The facility census was 54.Findings include:Observation on 01/13/26 at 12:00 P.M. revealed Resident #85 received green peas, baked sweet potatoes, and a salad. She did not receive baked ham.Observation on 01/14/26 at 11:50 A.M. revealed Resident #85 received green beans and mashed potatoes from the kitchen. She did not receive chicken or noodles.Interview on 01/14/26 at 11:50 A.M. with Area Director of Food Services #317 verified Resident #85 did not receive the Entree. He reported they had vegetarian options and the always available menu which included meat free options and she should receive one of those.Interview on 01/15/26 at 9:38 A.M. with Resident #85's power of attorney (POA) verified the resident followed a vegetarian diet and she expected the resident to be receiving full meals.Interview on 01/15/26 at 10:00 A.M. with Culinary Support #250 revealed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-01-20 · tag F0805 — failed to prepare food in a form residents can eat — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide the appropriate diet texture as ordered for Resident #65 and #67. This affected two residents (#65 and #67) of twelve reviewed for dining. The facility census was 54.Findings include: 1.Review of Resident #67's medical record revealed an admission date of 11/13/25 with diagnoses including fracture of unspecified part of femur, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, heart failure, anxiety disorder, Parkinson's disease, and unspecified convulsions. Review of Resident #67's comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed she had intact cognition. She received antianxiety medication, antidepressants, anticoagulants, antibiotics, opioids, and anticonvulsants. Review of Resident #67's after visit summary dated 01/12/26 revealed the resident was at moderate risk for aspiration and the diet recommended for the resident was International Dysphagia Diet Standardization Initiative (IDDSI) level six (soft and bite…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-01-20 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, medical record review, interviews and facility policy review, the facility failed to maintain appropriate infection control practices to prevent the potential spread of infection. This affected two residents (#91 and #93) of 22 sampled residents. The facility census was 54.Findings Include:1. Review of the medical record for Resident #93 revealed an initial admission date of 01/10/26 with the diagnoses including but not limited to acute respiratory failure, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), atherosclerotic heart disease, severe morbid obesity. right bundle branch block, bifascicular block, ventricular tachycardia, gout, Parkinson's disease, benign prostatic hyperplasia, hyperlipidemia, hypothyroidism, constipation and prediabetes. Review of the resident's admission observation and data collection dated 01/10/26 revealed the resident was admitted to the facility being alert, with impaired daily decision making. The assessment indicated the resident was admitted to the facility with an indwelling urinary catheter. Review of the plan of care dated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-01-20 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — isolated
    Make sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and medical record review the facility failed to ensure Resident #49's call light was kept within reach. This affected one resident (#49) of five reviewed for environment. The facility census was 54.Findings include:Observation on 01/12/26 at 10:02 A.M., 1:42 P.M., and 2:25 P.M., on 01/13/26 at 1:30 P.M. and 3:36 P.M., on 01/14/26 at 8:49 A.M., and on 01/15/26 at 8:35 A.M. revealed the resident in her recliner with no call light. The call light was observed near her bed across the room.Interview on 01/15/26 at 8:35 A.M. with Certified Resident Care Associate (CRCA) #324 revealed the resident could use a call light. CRCA #324 verified the resident spent most of her time in the recliner and had no way to call for staff. She reported the facility did not have call light pendants and the regular wall call light did not reach to the recliner. She reported she knew extended cords could be obtained for the call light, but the resident did not have one.Review of Resident #49's medical…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-10-14 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, staff interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to document and address a resident representative grievance timely. This affected one (Resident #54) of three resident grievances reviewed. The census was 52.Findings Include:Record review for Resident #54 revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. His diagnoses were peritoneal abscess, sclerosing mesenteritis, other disease of stomach and duodenum, other specified diseases of intestines, syncope and collapse, unspecified severe protein-calorie malnutrition, occlusion and stenosis of bilateral carotid arteries, hypertensive heart and chronic kidney disease with heart failure, congestive heart failure, chronic kidney disease, other ventricular tachycardia, atherosclerotic heart disease, hypo-osmolality and hyponatremia, nonrheumatic aortic (valve) stenosis, unspecified right bundle-branch block, old myocardial infarction, and hyperlipidemia. Review of his Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-12 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure fall interventions were in place for a resident at risk for falls. This affected one resident (Resident #54) out three residents reviewed for falls. The facility census was 52. Findings Include: Review of Resident #54's medical record revealed admission date [DATE] with the following diagnoses including but not limited to acute respiratory failure, congestive heart failure (CHF), cardiomegaly, atrial fibrillation, and history of hemorrhagic stroke. Resident #54 expired on [DATE]. Review of Resident #54's admission fall risk evaluation dated [DATE] revealed Resident #54 was at risk for falling related to poor mobility, history of stroke, and weakness. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #54 required assistance from staff for transfers, ambulation, and personal hygiene tasks and the resident had impaired cognition with Brief Interview Mental Status (BIMS) of 9 out of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-10-17 · tag F0730 — widespread
    Observe each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on employee file review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure State Tested Nursing Assistants (STNAs) received annual performance reviews. This had the potential to affect all residents residing in the facility. The facility census was 46 residents. Findings Include: Review of STNA #139's employee file revealed a date of hire of 05/30/23. STNA #139's file contained a 90-day evaluation dated 11/10/23. STNA #139's file did not include an annual performance appraisal as of 10/17/24. Interview on 10/17/24 at 10:25 A.M. with Business Office Staff (BOS) #136 confirmed there was no annual evaluation present in the employee file for STNA #139. BOS #136 stated they were not required to do evaluations after the 90-day evaluation. Interview on 10/17/24 at 12:00 P.M. with the administrator confirmed there was no annual evaluation in the employee file for STNA #139.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-10-17 · tag F0947 — failed to train nurse aides adequately — widespread
    Ensure nurse aides have the skills they need to care for residents, and give nurse aides education in dementia care and abuse prevention.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure State Tested Nurse Aides (STNAs) completed the minimum required 12 hours of in-servicing a year. This affected one (STNA #139) of two STNAs reviewed for required in-services. This had the potential to affect all residents in the facility. The facility census was 46. Findings Include: Review of STNA #139's personnel record revealed a hire date of 05/30/23. The record revealed STNA #139 completed six hours of training as a new hire in orientation. STNA #139 was assigned 12 hours of inservice/ on-line training that had not been completed. Interview on 10/17/23 at 10:35 A.M., with Business office staff member #136 verified STNA #139 did not complete the required 12 hours of in-service training for the last year. Interview on 10/17/23 at 12:00 P.M., with the administrator verified the facility assigned 12 hours of on-line training but STNA #139 did not complete the training. The administrator agreed the minimum requirements for STNA staff was to complete 12 hours of in-servicing/training annually.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-10-17 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interview and review of facility policy the facility failed to ensure multi use vials of tuberculin purified protein derivative (PPD) were dated when they were opened. This had the potential to affect the 30 new admissions since 09/26/27 which included Residents #18, #38, #39, #40, #41, #42, #43, #132, #133, #134, #135, #136, #137, #138, #232, #234, #235, #236, #237, #239, #240, #241, #242, #243, #244, #245, #246, #247, #244 and #245. The facility census was 46. Findings Include: Observation on 10/17/24 at 10:08 A.M. of the 200 hallway medication room with the Director of Nursing (DON) revealed three open, used and unlabeled tuberculin purified protein derivative (PPD) solutions. Interview on 10/17/24 at 10:10 A.M. with the DON confirmed the tuberculin PPD solution was opened but neither the box nor the vials were dated as to when opened. The DON revealed the facility received the PPD solution on 09/26/24 confirming the medication was not past its possible use by date. The DON confirmed the opened vials should have been labeled with a date. Review of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-17 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to take vital signs in connection to an as needed blood pressure medication. This affected one (Resident #5) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. Also, the facility failed to hold blood pressure medications and notify the physician when vital signs were outside safe/accepted parameters. This affected one (Resident #27) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The census was 46. Findings Include: 1. Resident #5 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included multiple fractures of pelvic with stable disruption of pelvic ring, pneumonia, type II diabetes, hypertensive heart and chronic kidney disease with heart failure, heart failure, chronic kidney disease (stage III), acute posthemorrhagic anemia, hypothyroidism, vitamin B deficiency, hypo-osmolality and hyponatremia, pure hypercholesterolemia, depression, unspecified hearing loss, gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), parasthesia of skin,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-17 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, observation and interview the facility failed to ensure care planned interventions for falls were implemented for Resident #20. This affected one (Resident #20) out of four residents reviewed for falls. The facility census was 46. Findings Include: Review of the medical record for Resident #20 revealed an admission date of 06/14/23, with diagnoses including hydrocephalus, disorientation, altered mental status, hemiplegia, type two diabetes, depression, and anxiety. Review of the most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment, completed on 08/23/24, indicated that the resident was severely cognitively impaired and required assistance with ambulation. Review of the care plan, dated 06/16/23, revealed Resident #20 was at risk for falls related to impaired balance, left hemiparesis, right thalamic mass, medication side effects, incontinence and cognition deficits. Review of interventions for the falls care plan revealed an intervention, dated 07/26/23, for bed mat on the floor. Observation of Resident #20's room and bathroom on 10/15/24 at 9:23 A.M. and 4:39…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-10-17 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to provide evidence to support pharmacy recommendations were reviewed in a timely manner. This affected three (Residents #5, #27, and #7) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. Also, the facility failed to follow a pharmacy recommendation after the physician agreed to the recommendation. This affected one (Resident #7) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The census was 46. Findings Include: 1. Resident #5 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included multiple fractures of pelvic with stable disruption of pelvic ring, pneumonia, type II diabetes, hypertensive heart and chronic kidney disease with heart failure, heart failure, chronic kidney disease (stage III), acute posthemorrhagic anemia, hypothyroidism, vitamin B deficiency, hypo-osmolality and hyponatremia, pure hypercholesterolemia, depression, unspecified hearing loss, gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), parasthesia of skin,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-10-17 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to provide proper parameters for as needed and scheduled medications. This affected four (Residents #5, #27, #137, and #7) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The census was 46. Findings Include: 1. Resident #5 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #5's diagnoses included multiple fractures of pelvic with stable disruption of pelvic ring, pneumonia, type II diabetes, hypertensive heart and chronic kidney disease with heart failure, heart failure, chronic kidney disease (stage III), acute posthemorrhagic anemia, hypothyroidism, vitamin B deficiency, hypo-osmolality and hyponatremia, pure hypercholesterolemia, depression, unspecified hearing loss, gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), parasthesia of skin, dysphagia, and need for assistance with personal care. Review of Resident #5's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 06/21/24, revealed Resident #5 was cognitively intact. Review of Resident #5's current…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-17 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review, medication administration observation, staff interviews, and medication administration policy review, the facility failed to ensure a medication error rate of five percent or less. Two errors occurred in 35 opportunities for error. The medication error rate was 5.77 percent. This affected one resident (Resident #20) of four residents observed for medication administration. The facility census was 46. Findings Include: Review of the medical record for Resident #20 revealed an admission date of 06/14/23, with diagnoses that include hydrocephalus, disorientation, altered mental status, hemiplegia, type two diabetes, depression, and anxiety. The most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment, completed on 08/23/24, indicated Resident #20 was severely cognitively impaired. Review of the care plan dated 08/08/23 revealed Resident #20 utilized anti-depressant and chemical interventions related to the signs and symptoms of depression. Review of physician orders for Resident #20 revealed the following orders: -Duloxetine capsule, delayed release, 60…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-08-08 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, facility policy and procedure review and interview the facility failed to provide Resident #27 dignity related to the use of an indwelling urinary catheter when the urinary collection bag was observed uncovered. This affected one resident (#27) of two residents reviewed for dignity. Findings include: Review of Resident #27's medical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including traumatic hemorrhage of cerebrum, other obstructive and reflux uropathy, benign prostatic hyperplasia, flaccid neuropathic bladder, type two diabetes mellitus, hyperlipidemia, depression, spinal stenosis and unspecified cord compression. Review of the comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment, dated 06/10/22 revealed Resident #27 had moderately impaired cognition. The assessment did not reflect the use of a urinary catheter for the resident. Review of the plan of care, dated 07/27/22 revealed Resident #27 used a Foley catheter for a diagnosis of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-08-08 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, facility policy and procedure review and interview the facility failed to ensure a potential incident of physical abuse was immediately reported to the Administrator and to the State agency as required. This affected two residents (#7 and #8) of two residents reviewed for abuse. Findings include: Record review revealed Resident #7 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including hypertensive chronic kidney disease, acute cystitis, osteoarthritis, atherosclerosis, atherosclerotic heart disease, vascular dementia without behavioral disturbances, anxiety disorder, restlessness and agitation, major depressive disorder, and hypothyroidism. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment, dated 05/06/22 revealed the resident had significant cognitive impairment. Review of Resident #7's progress notes, dated 07/10/22 (late entry written on 07/11/22), revealed the nurse was passing medication and heard yelling from the dining area. She went to the dining area and found Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-08-08 · tag F0625 — isolated
    Notify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, facility policy and procedure review and interview the facility failed to provide a bed hold notice to Resident #42 and/or the residents representative at the time of discharge to the hospital. This affected one resident (#42) of two residents reviewed for hospitalization. Findings include: Record review revealed Resident #42 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including metabolic encephalopathy, respiratory failure, hypertensive heart and kidney failure, congestive heart failure, atrial fibrillation, morbid obesity, osteoarthritis, obstructive sleep apnea, type II diabetes, hyperlipidemia and dependence on supplemental oxygen. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment, dated 05/13/22 revealed the resident was cognitively intact. Review of Resident #42's medical record revealed she was discharged from the facility to the hospital on [DATE]. Record review revealed no evidence the resident or her responsible party were provided a bed hold notice at the time of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-08-08 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview the facility failed to ensure Resident #243's peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC) line dressing was changed as ordered by the physician. This affected one resident (#243) of two residents reviewed for intravenous catheter lines. Findings include: Record review revealed Resident #243 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including encounter for orthopedic aftercare following surgical amputation, acquired absence of right great toe, osteomyelitis, cellulitis of right lower limb, type two diabetes mellitus with diabetic peripheral angiopathy with gangrene, morbid obesity due to excess calories, type two diabetes mellitus with diabetic neuropathy and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Record review revealed a physician's order, dated 07/08/22 for IV- PICC dressing change every five days, measure external catheter length, enter in measurement med note. Review of the 07/15/22 admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment revealed the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-08-08 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview the facility failed to ensure pre and post hemodialysis assessments were completed for Resident #14. This affected one resident (#14) of one resident reviewed for hemodialysis. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #14 revealed an admission date of 05/29/22 with diagnoses including encephalopathy, end stage renal disease with dependence on renal dialysis, hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infraction affecting left non-dominant side, hyperlipidemia, gastro-esophageal reflux disease, disorientation, and unspecified convulsions. Review of the physician's orders, dated 05/30/22 to 06/01/22 revealed an order for hemodialysis every Monday, Wednesday and Friday. A Dialysis Center Communication Observation was to be completed under 'other clinical observation' and sent with the resident. On 06/01/22 a physician's order revealed hemodialysis every Monday, Wednesday and Friday. A Dialysis Center Communication Observation was to be completed under 'other clinical observation' and sent with resident. Dialysis was scheduled…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-08-08 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview the facility failed to maintain a medication error rate of less than five percent (%). The medication error rate was calculated to be 12.90% and included four medication errors of 31 medication administration opportunities. This affected one resident (#293) of three residents observed for medication administration. Findings include: Record review revealed Resident #293 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including moderate protein-calorie malnutrition, atherosclerosis of aorta, asthma, hyperlipidemia, irritable bowel syndrome without diarrhea, dysphagia, dysphonia, adult failure to thrive, hypertension, gastro-esophageal reflux disease, constipation and shortness of breath. Review of physician's orders revealed the following oral medication orders, dated 07/13/22: Aspirin tablet delayed release/ enteric coated (DR/EC) 81 milligrams (mg) oral once a day for blood thinning. Metoprolol succinate (blood pressure and angina medication) extended…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-08-08 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — isolated
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review and interview the facility failed to prepare and serve pureed foods in a manner to ensure they were served at the proper temperature and to ensure palatability. This had the potential to affect two residents (#241 and #244) of two residents identified to be on a pureed diet. The facility census was 48. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #241 revealed an admission date of 06/21/22 with diagnoses including fracture of unspecified part of neck of left femur, encephalopathy, sepsis, anxiety disorder, dysphagia, adult failure to thrive, and restlessness and agitation. Resident #241 had a physician's order, dated 07/08/22 for a regular diet with a puree consistency Review of the comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment, dated 07/13/22 revealed Resident #241 had intact cognition, was on a mechanically altered diet and had a feeding tube providing 51% or more of calories and 501 cubic centimeters (cc's) or more of fluid a day. Review of the medical record for Resident #244 revealed an admission date of 07/15/22 with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-08-08 · tag F0810 — isolated
    Provide special eating equipment and utensils for residents who need them and appropriate assistance.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview the facility failed to ensure Resident #5 was provided assistive devices at meals as ordered. This affected one resident (#5) of three reviewed for nutrition. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #5 revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including unspecified dementia without behavioral disturbance, atherosclerotic heart disease, unspecified psychosis not due to a substance or known physiological condition, delirium due to known physiological condition, other bipolar disorder, post-traumatic stress disorder, auditory hallucinations and gastro-esophageal reflux disease. Review of the physician's order revealed an order, dated 03/29/21 for Resident #5 to use a divided plate at all meals for increased ability to self-feed during meals. Review of the comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment, dated 04/29/22 revealed Resident #5 had severe cognitive impairment and required the supervision of one…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$16,801 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

  • $16,801 — penalty dated 2024-03-12

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to TRILOGY HEALTH SERVICES — 123 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 2 of 54.2-2.2 vs chain
Health inspection 2 of 53.5-1.5 vs chain
Staffing 3 of 53.3-0.3 vs chain
Quality measures 4 of 54.8-0.8 vs chain
The other 122 homes this chain runs (chain average 4.2★, per CMS)
1 of 5Heritage TheFindlay, OH 1 of 5The Oaks Rehabilitation and Healthcare CenterZanesville, OH 2 of 5Homewood Health CampusLebanon, IN 2 of 5Woodmont Health CampusBoonville, IN 3 of 5Cobblestone Crossings Health CampusTerre Haute, IN 3 of 5Creasy Springs Health CampusLafayette, IN 3 of 5Cumberland Pointe Health CampusWest Lafayette, IN 3 of 5Forest Park Health CampusRichmond, IN 3 of 5Franciscan Health Care CenterLouisville, KY 3 of 5Greenleaf Health CampusElkhart, IN 3 of 5River Terrace Health CampusMadison, IN 3 of 5Scenic Hills At The MonasteryFerdinand, IN 3 of 5Smiths Mill Health CampusNew Albany, OH 3 of 5Springhurst Health CampusGreenfield, IN 3 of 5Springs Of Richmond, TheRichmond, IN 3 of 5St Mary Healthcare CenterLafayette, IN 3 of 5Stonegate Health CampusLapeer, MI 3 of 5Sun Prairie Senior LivingSun Prairie, WI 3 of 5Taylor Springs Health CampusGahanna, OH 3 of 5The Willows at Fritz FarmLexington, KY 3 of 5The Willows at HamburgLexington, KY 3 of 5The Willows at HarrodsburgHarrodsburg, KY 3 of 5The Willows at SpringhurstLouisville, KY 3 of 5Villages At Oak Ridge, TheWashington, IN 3 of 5Waunakee Valley Senior LivingWaunakee, WI 3 of 5Wellbrooke Of CarmelCarmel, IN 4 of 5Arlington Place Health CampusIndianapolis, IN 4 of 5Ashford Place Health CampusShelbyville, IN 4 of 5Aspen Place Health CampusGreensburg, IN 4 of 5Avalon Springs Health CampusValparaiso, IN 4 of 5Bethany Pointe Health CampusAnderson, IN 4 of 5Blair Ridge Health CampusPeru, IN 4 of 5Bridgepointe Health CampusVincennes, IN 4 of 5Cedar Creek Health CampusLowell, IN 4 of 5Clearvista Lake Health CampusIndianapolis, IN 4 of 5Forest Springs Health CampusLouisville, KY 4 of 5Glen Oaks Health CampusNew Castle, IN 4 of 5Glen Ridge Health CampusLouisville, KY 4 of 5Meadows Of Delphos TheDelphos, OH 4 of 5Meadows Of Ottawa TheOttawa, OH

Showing 40 of 122; lowest-rated first.

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Investor-owned

CMS ownership filings flag an owner of this facility as a private-equity firm and a real-estate investment trust (REIT). That’s a fact worth knowing: peer-reviewed research links private-equity and REIT ownership to lower staffing and more citations on average — though any individual home can run well or poorly regardless. Read the inspection and staffing record above on its own merits.

  • TRILOGY REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST — REIT · 97.40% share · 5% Or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest
  • GAHC3 TRILOGY JV LLC — private equity · 70.00% share · 5% Or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest
  • TRILOGY OPCO LLC — private equity · 100.00% share · 5% Or Greater Direct Ownership Interest
  • GRIFFIN-AMERICAN HEALTHCARE REIT III, INC. — REIT · 100.00% share · 5% Or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest
  • TRILOGY HOLDINGS NT-HCI, LLC — private equity · 24.00% share · 5% Or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest
  • TRILOGY INVESTORS LLC — private equity · 100.00% share · 5% Or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest
  • TRILOGY HEALTHCARE HOLDINGS INC — private equity · 100.00% share · 5% Or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest
  • CONTINENTAL MERGER SUB LLC — private equity · 100.00% share · 5% Or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest

Source: CMS SNF ownership filings (PECOS). These flags are self-reported and undercount — federal auditors (GAO) and researchers find CMS captures only a fraction of true private-equity and REIT ties, so the absence of a flag on other homes is not proof they lack investor owners. How investor ownership affects care →

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
CONTINENTAL MERGER SUB LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 10/01/2021
GRIFFIN-AMERICAN HEALTHCARE REIT III, INC.Organization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 12/01/2015
NORTHSTAR HEALTHCARE INCOME INCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 12/01/2015
NORTHSTAR HEALTHCARE INCOME OPERATING PARTNERSHIP LPOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 12/01/2015
TRILOGY HOLDINGS NT-HCI, LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 12/01/2015
WILLHITE, GABRIELIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICERsince 08/15/2023
BARNEY, LEIGHIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 01/01/2001
CONNER, GREGORYIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 06/03/2021
DAVIS, DAVIDIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 08/21/2017
MEHAFFEY, TODDIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 01/31/2022
PIETROWSKI, CRISTINAIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 01/31/2022
PROSKY, DANNYIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 12/01/2015
TRILOGY MANAGEMENT SERVICES LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 12/01/2015
ALTIER, JACQUELINEIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 08/02/2021
CORBIN, KATHYIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 09/05/2019
FIGHTMASTER, LISAIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 12/01/2015

CMS files one row per role, so the 17 rows in the source record cover these 16 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

6 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$11.3M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-2.8%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$1.5M
Related-party expense13% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 13%Medicare 17%Other / private 70%

This home reported $1.5M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 13% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$406per resident / day
operating cost
$12,333per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$395per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in OH

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Ohio Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Ohio
$9,186/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$10,389/mo
Nursing home (private)
$6,103/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 366474. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-01-20, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next