The Oaks Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center
3291 Northpointe Drive, Zanesville, OH 43701 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 75 certified beds · (740) 452-3000 Medicare & Medicaid certified
The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- it has a citation for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0569)
- it has 3 actual-harm citations
- a high number of inspection citations overall (50) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $54,030 in federal fines (most recent 2025-07-29)
- its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 2 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 1 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 4 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 4 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 5 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 3 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 3 to 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 3.4% | 5.3% | 15.4% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 6.7% | 6.2% | 5.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.0% | 0.2% | 0.9% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.0% | 0.4% | 2.0% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 18.2% | 30.1% | 6.5% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 8.0% | 3.2% | 3.3% | worse |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 2.5% | 6.1% | 16.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 28.3% | 25.5% | 18.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 94.7% | 94.5% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 3.0% | 3.4% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 26.5% | 21.4% | 21.2% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 6.5% | 8.8% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 0.4% | 1.2% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 88.1% | 75.6% | 79.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 25.3% | 24.9% | 22.6% | worse |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 15.7% | 12.9% | 12.0% | worse |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 2.84 | 1.73 | 1.67 | worse |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 1.68 | 1.80 | 1.80 | typical |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
59.5% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 157 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 57.1% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 84 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.28 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 43% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 18% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 59.5%CMS range 51.0–66.5 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | better than U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 13.5%CMS range 10.0–18.0 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 57.1% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 45.2% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 44.0% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 100.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 100.0% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | 97.4% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 0.9% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 8.4%CMS range 5.2–12.9 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.19 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 75 beds and averages 71.7 residents a day — about 96% occupied, or roughly 3 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.73 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.22 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.42 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.43 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.85 on weekdays — 11% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.24 to 0.18 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
50 citations, most serious first. The 13 most serious are shown; the remaining 37 are one tap away and print in full.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2025-07-29 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, employee statement review, facility investigation review, hospital record review, employee file review, interviews and facility policy review the facility failed to timely and adequately assess and identify a major injury status post fall resulting in a delay in medical intervention. Actual harm occurred on 06/13/25 at approximately 9:30 P.M. when Resident #54, who was dependent on staff and the use of a mechanical lift for transfers, was discovered by Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #250 lying on the floor of her room, in front of her wheelchair. Resident #54 appeared to be in pain and was unable to recall what had occurred. CNA #250 and CNA #169 used a mechanical lift to place the resident in bed, without an assessment or direction from Licensed Practical Nurse #131. On 06/14/25 at 6:51 A.M. the resident complained of pain in her right leg with abnormal range of motion noted. The physician was notified, and an x-ray of the right hip and pelvis was ordered and completed at 7:47…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2024-06-25 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation, interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to provide appropriate assistance and follow care planned interventions for Resident #48 to prevent a fall with an injury. The facility failed to complete a fall investigation and neurological checks as ordered for Resident #29 and failed to ensure appropriate interventions were in place to prevent Resident #37 from leaving the secured unit. Actual harm occurred on 04/03/24 when Resident #48, who was severely cognitively impaired sustained a fall and fractured left hip when ambulating wearing inappropriate footwear and without her walker. At the time of the incident, staff told the resident to go put shoes on but failed to provide any additional intervention or assistance to prevent the fall with injury. This affected three residents (#29, #37, and #48) of seven residents reviewed for accidents. The facility census was 69. Findings include: 1.Review of the medical record for Resident #48 revealed an admission…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2022-06-28 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, facility policy and procedure review and interview the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive and individualized pain management program to provide adequate pain control for Resident #35. Actual harm occurred on 06/21/22 when Resident #35, who received Hospice services for terminal Parkinson's Disease, complained of continued, unrelieved pain despite scheduled and as needed narcotic pain medication doses, exhibited by verbal complaints of pain and moaning. The facility failed to comprehensively assess the resident's pain and notify Hospice services and/or the primary care physician regarding the resident's increased pain resulting in the resident being very restless and unable to get adequate rest due to increased pain despite additional dosages of as needed pain medication. This affected one resident (#35) of one resident reviewed for pain. The facility identified 12 residents receiving Hospice services and 50 residents on a pain management program. The census was 71.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-05-12 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to complete respiratory assessments pre and post administration of a nebulizer (aerosol) breathing treatment. This affected one resident (#73) of three residents reviewed for respiratory care. The facility census was 71. Findings include: Review of Resident #73's closed medical record revealed an admission date of 04/05/26, a discharge date of 04/11/26. The resident had diagnoses including hypertensive heart disease with heart failure, non ST elevation myocardial infarction, cellulitis of abdominal wall, acute pulmonary edema, chronic diastolic (congestive) heart failure, depression, peripheral vascular disease, encounter for surgical aftercare following surgery on the digestive system, atrial fibrillation, and generalized anxiety disorder. Review of Resident #73's five day minimum data set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed a brief interview for mental status score of 13 indicating the resident was cognitively intact. Further review of the MDS revealed the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-04-14 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review, staff interview, and facility policy the facility failed to administer medication as prescribed. This affected one resident (Resident #73) of three residents reviewed for medication administration. The facility census was 71.Findings include:Review of the closed medical record for Resident #73 revealed an admission date of 05/13/25 with diagnoses including, but not limited to, myocardial infarction, pulmonary fibrosis, and type two diabetes. The resident was discharged from the facility on 02/07/26.Review of the Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) for Resident #73, dated 11/07/25, revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 indicating the resident was cognitively intact.Review of the physician orders for Resident #73 revealed an order dated 11/24/25 for Meclizine (an antihistamine also used to prevent and treat vertigo, nausea, and vomiting) 12.5 milligrams (mg), give 12.5mg by mouth three times a day for vertigo. The order was discontinued on 02/09/26.Review of Resident #73's Medication Administration Record (MAR) for the month of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-01 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure Resident #35's family was notified of missing hearing aids in a timely manner. This affected one (Resident #35) out of three residents reviewed for notification of change. The facility census was 73. Findings include:A review of Resident #35's medical record revealed admission date 05/01/18 with diagnoses including but not limited to hearing loss, degenerative disease of the nervous system, seizures, and assistance with personal cares. A review of Resident #35's physician orders revealed an order dated 11/30/24 to check bilateral hearing aid batteries and tubes every shift and as needed (PRN), two times per day, and an order dated 05/20/25 for bilateral hearing aids to be placed in a storage case in the medication cart each night at bedtime.A review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #35 had impaired cognition with a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of three out of possible 15, had…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-01 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation and interviews, the facility failed to ensure the physician ordered diet was followed for Resident #35, who had a swallowing impairment. This affected one (Resident #35) out of three residents reviewed for diet orders. The facility census was 73. Findings include:A review of Resident #35's medical record revealed admission date 05/01/18 with diagnoses including but not limited to hearing loss, degenerative disease of the nervous system, seizures, and assistance with personal cares.A review of Resident #35's speech summary notes dated 01/09/24 to 02/19/24 revealed laryngeal/pharyngeal performances were impaired with a history of penetration of liquids when a straw was used. A review of Resident #35's physician orders revealed an order dated 11/25/24 for regular diet, regular texture, regular/thin consistency, cut up meats, no straws, finger foods as able, plate guard and gray built-up utensils, no spaghetti.A review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-29 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation, staff interview, and facility policy review the facility failed to ensure fall interventions were implemented. This deficient practice affected one resident (Resident #61) out of four residents reviewed for accidents and hazards. The facility census was 65. Findings Include: Review of the medical record for Resident #61 revealed an admission date of 06/01/22 with diagnoses including but not limited to Parkinson's disease, dementia, chronic kidney disease, and depression. Review of Resident #61's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Resident #61 had impaired cognition with a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of two out of possible 15. Resident #61 required assistance from staff for transfers and Resident #61 used a walker and wheelchair for assistance for mobility. Review of Resident #61's assessments revealed a fall risk assessment was completed on 07/07/25 and 07/13/25 with Resident #61 being identified as high risk for falls. Review of Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-29 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure physician ordered nutritional interventions were implemented for residents with significant weight loss and dietician recommendations were addressed. This affected one resident (Resident #17) of two residents reviewed for nutrition. The facility census was 65. Findings include:Review of Resident # 17's medical record revealed an admission date of 11/19/24 with diagnosis including dementia without behavioral disturbance, type 2 diabetes mellitus, chronic kidney disease stage 3, anxiety disorder, and major depressive disorder. Review of the medical record revealed the Resident #17 experienced a 41-pound significant weight loss (24.4%) from December 2024 through July 2025. The resident's weights were as follows: 12/16/24 172 poundsNo January 2025 weight02/04/25 167.5 pounds03/01/25 168.8 pounds04/01/25 147.8 pounds05/01/25 147.8 pounds05/30/25 138.8 pounds06/21/25 130 pounds07/01/25 128.8 pounds Review of the risk for altered nutritional status related to dementia and depression, chronic kidney disease,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-29 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, interview and policy review the facility failed to ensure non-pharmacologic pain interventions were implemented prior to the administration of as needed pain medication. This affected two residents (#25 and #45) of three residents reviewed for pain management. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident # 45's medical record revealed that he was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included myocardial infarction, spinal stenosis, diabetes, post laminectomy syndrome, diabetes mellitus type 2, and chronic venous insufficiency. Review of Resident #45's Minimum Data Set Assessment, dated 5/20/25 revealed that he was dependent on staff for toileting hygiene and transfers and his BIMS score was 15. Review of Resident #45's Physicians' orders revealed an order for Oxycodone HCl Oral Tablet 15mg; Give 1 tablet by mouth every 6 hours for pain. There was no order for non- pharmacological interventions for his pain medication. Review of Resident #45's Medication Administration Record, dated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-29 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure infection control guidelines were maintained during a dressing change. This affected one resident (Resident #47) of one residents observed for dressing changes. The facility census was 65. Findings include: Medical record review revealed Resident #47 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnosis including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, chronic respiratory failure, and hypertension. Review of the physician orders revealed to cleanse the sacral wound with normal saline and apply triad paste and a large dry dressing daily. On 07/23/25 at 8:00 A.M. a dressing change was observed for Resident #47 with Nurse # 129 and the Assistant Director of Nursing #152 completing the resident care. Nurse #129 assisted Resident #47 with pulling her pants down to expose the old dressing and removed the dressing. Nurse #129 proceeded to remove her gloves, perform hand hygiene and donned a new pair of clean gloves. Nurse #129 cleansed the wound…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2025-06-16 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — widespreadProvide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, review of facility assessment, review of concerns logs, review of time sheets, review of facility policy, observation, and interviews the facility failed to ensure adequate nursing staff to ensure residents received medication timely and failed to provide adequate supervision. This affected five residents (#20, #23, #26, #32, and #51) of six residents reviewed for medication administration and one resident (#66) of two residents reviewed on the secure unit with the potential to affect all 72 residents residing in the facility. Findings included: 1. Medical record review revealed Resident #20 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including anxiety, depression, bipolar, and schizoaffective disorder. Review of resident concern form dated 06/05/25 revealed Resident #20 had concerns regarding medications. The resident reported he never got his night medication on 06/03/25 and night shift staff were not good with nurses and medications. Review of Resident #20's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2025-06-16 · tag F0851 — widespreadElectronically submit to CMS complete and accurate direct care staffing information, based on payroll and other verifiable and auditable data.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of the Payroll Base Journal (PBJ) Staffing Data Report and interview the facility failed to submit staffing information to Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) timely. This had the potential to affect all 72 residents residing in the facility. Findings included: Review of the PBJ Staffing Data Report ran 05/29/25 revealed the facility failed to submit data for the first quarter (October 1st to December 31st) in 2025. The facility also triggered for a one-star staff rating. Interview on 06/05/25 at 9:08 A.M. and 9:50 A.M., with the Chief of Operation (CEO) confirmed there was no documented evidence the first quarter staffing data was reported to CMS. The CEO reported that the facility changed ownership in December of 2024, and it was the previous ownership responsibility to report the staff data to CMS. The CEO reported on April 1st of 2025 he had received an e-mail that the previous owner sent the data to a contracted company on 02/11/25. The contracted company was responsible for reporting the data to CMS, however there was no documented evidence that…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 37 citations
- Potential for harm · E2025-06-16 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and policy review the facility failed to ensure medication carts were properly secured and medication were properly stored and labeled. This had the potential to affect 11 residents (#1, #2, #3, #4, #5, #6, #7, #8, #9, #10, #11) of 11 residents residing on 100 hall and 40 residents (#12, #13, #14, #15, #16, #17, #18, #19, #20, #21, #22, #23, #24, #25, #26, #27, #28, #29, #30, #31, #32, #33, #34, #35, #36, #37, #38, #39, #40, #41, #42, #43, #44, #45, #46, #47, #48, #49, #50, and #51) of 40 residents residing on 200 hall. The facility census was 72. Findings included: 1. Observation of 100 hall on 06/04/25 at 6:59 A.M., revealed the 100-medication cart was left unlocked and unattended. The medication cart was located between rooms [ROOM NUMBERS]. Interview on 06/04/25 at 7:00 A.M., with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #133 confirmed she had left the medication cart unlocked and unattended. The LPN reported she was on 300 hall getting report. Interview on 06/04/25 at 11:54 A.M., with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-16 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, review of self-reported incident (SRI), review of the facility investigation, interview, and policy review the facility failed to ensure all allegations of resident abuse was reported immediately to the administrator and to the state survey agency. This affected two residents (#66, #70) of four residents reviewed for abuse. Findings included: Review of Resident #70's medical record revealed Resident #70 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including Alzheimer's, dementia, mood disorder, paranoid personality disorder, delusional, depression, anxiety, and hypertension. The resident resided on the secure unit. Review of Resident #66's medical record revealed Resident #66 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including heart failure, dementia, diabetes, kidney disease, dementia, and depression. The resident resided on the secure unit, however, was a previous resident of the attached Assisted Living (AL). Review of the SRI 260860 dated 05/27/25 (four…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-16 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, review of a self-reported incident (SRI) and investigation, and interview the facility failed to ensure a dependent resident was provided adequate oral hygiene. This affected one resident (#36) of one resident reviewed for neglect. Findings included: Review of Resident #36's medical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including need for assistance with personal care, lack of coordination, dysphagia, and degenerative disease of the nervous system. Review of Resident #36's Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident had severe cognition impairment. The resident had no rejection of care behaviors. It was very important to have her family involved in discussions about her care. The resident had functional limitation of range of motion on one side of the upper extremity and both sides on lower extremity. The resident required substantial/maximal (helper does more than half of the effort) for oral hygiene.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-16 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, review of self-reported incident (SRI), review of the facility's investigation, interview, and policy review the facility failed to timely assess, monitor, and report weight gain. This affected one resident (#70) of three residents reviewed for falls and one resident (#20) three residents reviewed nutrition. Findings included: 1. Review of Resident #70's medical record revealed Resident #70 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including Alzheimer's, dementia, mood disorder, paranoid personality disorder, delusional, depression, anxiety, and hypertension. The resident resided on the secure unit. Review of the SRI 260860 dated 05/27/25 (four days after the incident) revealed on 05/23/25 staff heard yelling coming from Resident #66's room. Upon entering the room, Resident #70 was noted sitting upright on buttocks with Resident #66 standing over her. Resident #66 informed staff that Resident #70 wouldn't leave her room, so she pushed Resident #70 down. Residents were…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-06-16 · tag F0687 — failed to care for feet properly — isolatedProvide appropriate foot care.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, review of hospital notes, review of wound clinic notes, and interviews, the facility failed to comprehensively assess and provide treatment as ordered to a resident foot. This affected one resident (#2) of three residents reviewed for skin alterations. Findings included: Medical record review revealed Resident #2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including heart failure, cellulitis, diabetes, protein-calorie malnutrition, immunodeficiency, breast cancer, venous insufficiency, and pulmonary hypertension. Review of Resident #2's hospital skin assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident had a wound on bottom left great toe that measured 1.0 centimeter (cm) by 0.8 cm and unable to determine depth (UTD) with scant sanguineous drainage. The wound bed was dry, red, and crusted with sanguineous drainage. The peri-wound was calloused, red, and purple and the margins were irregular shaped with a purple rim noted. Review of Resident #2's hospital orders dated 04/29/25…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-16 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interviews and record review the facility failed to ensure safety measures were implemented to prevent resident injuries. This affected one resident (#34) of three residents reviewed for accidents. Findings Include: Review of the medical record for Resident #34 revealed an admission date 08/07/24. Diagnoses included diabetes mellitus, respiratory failure with hypoxia, chronic kidney disease, heart failure, dysphagia, and other feeding difficulties. Review of the physician orders dated 06/10/25 revealed wound care for left leg to be cleansed with normal saline, apply skin prep and leave upon to air. Monitor steri strips and allow them to fall off on their own. Review of the wound evaluation dated 12/10/24 revealed new skin tear to right lateral calf noted measuring 3.4 centimeter (cm) by 2.8 cm by 0.2 cm. Resident #34 reported the night before the leg piece of the wheelchair hit her leg. The intervention was to pad the leg rest on the wheelchair. Review of the progress note dated 12/10/24 at 9:34 A.M. revealed new skin tear to right lateral calf noted. Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-16 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, it was determined the facility failed to treat Urinary Tract Infections (UTI) in a timely manner for all residents. This affected one resident (#34) of one resident (Resident #34) for UTI. Findings Include: Review of the medical record for Resident #34 revealed an admission date 08/07/24. Diagnoses included diabetes mellitus, respiratory failure with hypoxia, chronic kidney disease, heart failure, dysphagia, and other feeding difficulties. Resident #34 had intact cognition. Review of the quarterly Minimum data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #34 had intact cognition. Resident #34 was dependent on transfers and had frequent incontinence of bowel and bladder. Review of the progress note dated 06/04/25 at 8:00 A.M. revealed the Nurse Practitioner (NP) #300 saw Resident #34. Resident #34 reported worsening burning and discomfort on urination and increase pain with urination. Resident #34 had followed with Infectious Disease (ID) in the past for her frequent,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-06-16 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolatedEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, review of Medscape, observation, interview, and policy review the facility failed to ensure the facility medication error rate was not greater than five percent. The facility had five medication errors out of 28 opportunities resulting in a medication error rate of 17.8%. This affected two residents (#20 and #49) of three residents observed for medication administration. Findings included: 1. Record review revealed Resident #20 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including bipolar, anxiety, schizoaffective disorder, depression, obsessive-compulsive disorder, cirrhosis of the liver, type two diabetes, hypertension, non-ST elevation myocardial infarction, hyperlipidemia, edema, atrial fibrillation, and the need for assistance with personal care. Review of Resident #20's current orders dated 06/01/25 revealed Metoprolol Succinate extended release (ER) 25 milligrams (mg) give one tablet by mouth daily for hypertension, Sertraline 150 mg daily for bipolar, and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-06-16 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, interview, observation, and policy review the facility failed to ensure residents were free from significant medication errors. This affected one resident (#49) of three residents reviewed for medication administration and one resident (#34) of three residents reviewed for urinary tract infections (UTI). Findings included: 1. Medical record review revealed Resident #49 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including cerebral infarction due to thrombosis of right posterior cerebral artery, acute respiratory failure, type two diabetes, atelectasis, chronic heart failure, hypertension, dysphagia, peripheral vascular disease, gastro-esophageal reflux disease, and urinary tract infection (UTI). Review of Resident #49's orders dated 05/01/25 and 06/01/25 revealed Metoprolol 100 mg one tablet twice daily for hypertension. Review of Resident #49's Medication Administration Record dated 05/01/25 to 06/04/25 revealed the Metoprolol was not administered at 5:00 P.M.,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-06-16 · tag F0810 — isolatedProvide special eating equipment and utensils for residents who need them and appropriate assistance.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews and record review the facility failed to ensure all residents had required assistive device available during meal times. This affected one resident (#34) of one resident that was reviewed for assistive devices. Findings Include: Review of the medical record for Resident #34 revealed an admission date 08/07/24. Diagnoses included diabetes mellitus, respiratory failure with hypoxia, chronic kidney disease, heart failure, dysphagia, and other feeding difficulties. Resident #34 had intact cognition. Review of physician orders for June 2025 revealed regular diet, regular texture and thin consistency for liquids. Divided plate, Kennedy cup (cup with handles and lid) and built-up utensils for all meals as tolerated dated 11/26/24. Review of the plan of care for Resident #34 revealed the resident had an activity of daily living (ADL's) self-care performance deficit related to cognitive impairment, fluctuating ADL's, generalized weakness and poor coordination. Interventions included…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-16 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation, interview, and policy review the facility failed to ensure medication administration was accurately documented on the medication administration record (MAR). This affected one resident (#49) of three residents reviewed for medication administration. Findings included: 1. Medical record review revealed Resident #49 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including cerebral infarction, chronic right heart failure, hypertension, peripheral vascular disease, and the need for assistance with personal care. Review of Resident #49's current orders revealed on 04/03/25 the resident was ordered Metoprolol 100 milligrams (mg) twice daily for hypertension. Observation on 06/04/25 at 7:29 A.M., of Resident #49's medication administration revealed no evidence Metoprolol was available to administer. Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #179 reported the Metoprolol 100 mg had been unavailable since 05/24/25. The LPN stated she called the pharmacy on 05/24/25 to re-order the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-16 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation, interview, and policy review the facility failed to ensure enhanced barrier precaution (EBP) were maintained during resident care and failed to ensure infection control practices were maintained during medication administration. This affected one resident (#4) of 72 residents observed during the tour and one resident (#49) of three residents observed for medication administration. Findings included: 1. Medical record review revealed Resident #4 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including calculus of gallbladder with acute cholecystitis with obstruction, acute renal failure, diabetes, need for assistance with personal care, urine retention, and stress incontinence. Review of Resident #4's orders dated 06/04/25 revealed the resident had a cholecystostomy tube and was on enhanced barrier precautions (EBP). Review of Resident #4's impaired gastrointestinal status related to status post gallbladder stone cholestostomy plan of care dated 05/23/25 and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-06-25 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — patternDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and medical record review the facility failed to ensure residents #16, #18, #40, and #59, had comprehensive care plans that addressed activity of daily living (ADL), wandering behaviors, and contracture. This affected four residents (#16, #18, #40, and #59) of 22 residents whose care plans were reviewed. The facility census was 69. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #18 revealed an admission date of 07/22/20 with diagnoses including multiple sclerosis, aphasia, dementia, heart failure, anxiety disorder, peripheral vascular disease, mixed receptive-expressive language disorder, depression, GERD, and dysphagia. Review of Resident #18 quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed severely impaired cognition. Review of Resident #18's plan of care profile care guide dated 06/12/24 revealed she required the extensive assistance of one person for incontinence care, showers, and transfers. Review of Resident #18's plan of care revealed it was absent for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-06-25 · tag F0744 — failed to care for residents with dementia — patternProvide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with dementia.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to appropriately document, revise, and implement care plans, and appropriately address Resident #35's dementia related behaviors. This affected one (Resident #35) of five residents reviewed for dementia and had the potential to affect all 12 residents on the memory care unit. The facility census was 69. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #35 revealed an admission date of 02/10/24 with diagnoses including Alzheimer's disease, dementia without behavioral disturbance, attention and concentration deficit, Crohn's disease, anxiety disorder, depression, unspecified convulsions, and overactive bladder. Review of Resident #35's physician order dated 02/10/24 to 02/13/24 and from 02/13/24 to 02/24/24 revealed an order for Lorazepam 0.5 mg one time a day as needed. Review of Resident #35's comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident had a severe cognitive impairment. Wandering was the only behavior…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-06-25 · tag F0805 — failed to prepare food in a form residents can eat — patternEnsure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, staff interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure pureed food items were an appropriate texture, requiring surveyor intervention. This affected six residents (Residents #6, #9, 11, #16, #49 and #320) who had an ordered pureed diet. The facility census was 69. Findings Include: Observations completed on 06/18/24 from 4:02 P.M. to 4:37 P.M. with Dining Services Assistant (DSA) #123 of pureed swiss steak revealed the facility had six residents on an ordered pureed diet and the cook would be preparing seven servings of swiss steak. DSA #123 washed his hands with soap and water at the sink and donned clean gloves. DSA #123 added seven whole swiss steak patties to the puree blender at 4:06 P.M. At 4:08 P.M., DSA #123 added one cup and one teaspoon of beef base and added ¼ teaspoon and ½ teaspoon of thickener to the swiss steak. DSA #123 stated he tasted the pureed food items prior to serving them to ensure an appropriate smooth texture was reached. At 4:12 P.M., DSA #123 stopped the blender and tasted the pureed swiss steak. DSA #123…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-06-25 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, staff interviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to follow appropriate hand hygiene and glove use during dinner meal service. Additionally, the facility failed to ensure prepared food temperatures were taken prior to delivering the foods to be served to the residents who resided on the Memory Care Unit (Residents #5, #18, #34, #35, #37, #42, #43, #48, #51, #59, #60, and #174). This had the potential to affect a total of 68 residents who resided in the facility and received foods from the kitchen. The facility had one resident (Resident #21) on an ordered nothing by mouth (NPO) diet. Findings Include: Observations of food temperatures with [NAME] #123 were attempted on 06/18/24 at 4:55 P.M. The Director of Food Services (DHS) #159 informed this surveyor at that time the steam table located in the kitchen was not working properly and food temperatures would be taken from the steam tables in the dining room areas. DHS #159 instructed Dining Services Assistant (DSA) #123 to escort this surveyor to the locked Memory Care Unit to observe food…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-06-25 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, medical record review, and interviews the facility failed to have enhanced barrier precautions (EBP) in place for Resident #58, #63, #171, and #371. This affected four (Resident #58, #63, #171, and #371) out of eight residents reviewed for enhanced barrier precautions. Also, the facility failed to follow contact isolation precaution procedures. This affected one (Resident #2) of five residents reviewed for infection control. The census was 69. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #58 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included but not limited to orthopedic aftercare, dysphagia, and an artificial opening status. Review of physician orders dated 05/06/24 revealed Resident #58 had orders for enteral feeding. An observation on 06/18/24 at 2:31 P.M. revealed no evidence of Resident #58 being on EBP. Interview on 06/18/24 at 3:00 P.M. Director of Nursing (DON) verified Resident #58 did not have any EBP signs or personal protective equipment (PPE) in place.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-25 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, review of medical records, and facility policy review, the facility failed to report potential abuse between Resident #35 and #37 to the state agency. This affected two residents (#35 and #37) of three residents reviewed for abuse. The facility census was 69. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #37 revealed an admission date of 11/08/23 with diagnoses including dementia, depression, diverticulosis, age-related osteoporosis without pathological fracture, repeated falls, and mixed-receptive-expressive language. Review of Resident #37's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #37 had intact cognition. Review of Resident #37's progress note dated 04/30/24 revealed another resident (Resident #35) attempted to bite a staff member and Resident #37 slapped the other resident on her right arm and screamed at her not to bite people. Both residents were separated. Review of the medical record for Resident #35 revealed an admission date of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-06-25 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews the facility failed to have an initial care conference in a timely manner for Resident #53. This affected one (Resident #53) out of one reviewed for care planning. Facility census was 69. Findings include: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #53 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included but not limited to joint replacement surgery, osteoarthritis, pain, and anxiety. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Resident #53 was cognitively intact. A progress note dated 05/17/24 at 11:46 A.M. revealed a family first meeting was scheduled for 05/22/24. Interview on 06/17/24 at 9:51 A.M. Resident #53 revealed a care conference was not held until Resident #53's family requested a care conference. Interview on 06/20/24 at 4:42 P.M. Director of Social Services (DSS) #161 stated initial care conferences were to be held within five days of admission. DSS #161 verified an initial care conference for Resident #53 was not held until 26 days after…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-06-25 · tag F0661 — isolatedEnsure necessary information is communicated to the resident, and receiving health care provider at the time of a planned discharge.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview the facility failed to provide a discharge summary when Resident #66 was discharged . This affected one (Resident #66) out of two residents reviewed for discharge. Facility census was 69. Findings include: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #66 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included but not limited to hemiplegia and hemiparesis, kidney disease, and dependence on renal dialysis. An order dated 05/17/24 revealed Resident #66 was to be discharged to the attached assisted living facility. An order dated 05/20/24 revealed Resident #66 needed a hospital bed with side rails. A notice of transfer/discharge date d 05/28/24 revealed the long-term care ombudsman was notified Resident #66 was transferred/discharged on 05/24/24 to an assisted living facility. On 06/18/24 at 2:20 P.M. Executive Director provided a handwritten discharge planning form dated 05/24/24. The discharge planning form revealed Resident #66 was discharged from the health care facility to an…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-25 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to provide Resident #53 with bathing as scheduled and per Resident #53's preference. This affected one (Resident #53) out of three reviewed for assistance with activities of daily living. Facility census was 69. Findings include: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #53 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included but not limited to joint replacement surgery, osteoarthritis, pain, and anxiety. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Resident #53 was cognitively intact. The MDS also revealed Resident #53 required substantial to maximal assistance for bathing. Review of the bathing schedule revealed Resident #53 was scheduled to be bathed in the evenings of Wednesday and Saturdays. Review of the electronic record and paper documentation from 05/02/24 to 06/17/24 revealed Resident #53 received three showers, two bed baths, four partial bed baths, and refused bathing once. Interview on 06/17/24 at 9:53 A.M. Resident #53…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-25 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on resident and staff interviews, medical record review, review of hospital records, and review of invoices for wound care equipment, the facility failed to ensure one resident's (Resident #63) wound vac and supplies were received prior to admission. This affected one resident (Resident #63) of one reviewed for medical equipment. The facility census was 69. Findings Include: Review of the medical record for Resident #63 revealed an admission date on 05/28/24 at 5:12 P.M. Medical diagnoses included sepsis, disruption of external operation (surgical) wound, generalized peritonitis (inflammation of the membrane lining of the abdominal wall and covering the abdominal organs), encounter for surgical aftercare following surgery on the digestive system- resection and infectious disease, volvulus (an obstruction due to twisting or knotting of the gastrointestinal tract), partial intestinal obstruction, ileus (inability of the intestine to contract normally and move waste out of the body), congenital malformations…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-25 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation, staff interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to timely identify, accurately assess, and timely treat one resident's (Resident #9) pressure ulcer areas of her right heel and ankle. This affected one resident (Resident #9) of two residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. The facility census was 69. Findings Include: Review of the closed medical record for Resident #9 revealed an admission date on 02/02/23 and a discharge date of 06/22/24. Medical diagnoses included Alzheimer's Disease, Type II Diabetes Mellitus with unspecified complications, mixed receptive-expressive language disorder, difficulty in walking, unsteadiness on feet, generalized weakness, cognitive communication deficit, and need for assistance with personal care. Review of the annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #9 had impaired cognition and scored three out of 15 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) assessment. Resident #9 required…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-25 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure orders were in place for Resident #171 who had a catheter. This affected one resident (#171) of one resident reviewed for catheters. The facility census was 69. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #171 revealed an admission date of 06/05/24 with diagnoses including Parkinsonism, type two diabetes mellitus, chronic kidney disease stage four, anxiety disorder, and Rheumatoid arthritis. Review of Resident #171's physician's orders from 06/05/24 to 06/23/24 revealed no orders related to catheter care. Review of Resident #171's progress note dated 06/05/24 revealed the resident admitted to the facility with a Foley catheter in place. Review of Resident #171's comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed severely impaired cognition. The resident had an indwelling catheter. Review of Resident #171's plan of care dated 06/19/24 revealed Resident #171 used a suprapubic catheter or Foley…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-06-25 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolatedEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to timely address all pharmacy recommendations. This affected one (Resident #31) of five residents reviewed for medication administration. The census was 69. Findings Include: Resident #31 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Her diagnoses were Parkinson's disease, psychosis, hypertensive heart disease, chronic kidney disease (stage III), heart failure, old myocardial infarction, osteoarthritis, syncope and collapse, major depressive disorder, hyperlipidemia, hypomagnesemia, hypokalemia, mild cognitive impairment, anxiety disorder, dysphagia, cognitive communication deficit, and pain in right shoulder. Review of her minimum data set (MDS) assessment, dated 03/31/24, revealed she was cognitively intact. Review of Resident #31 pharmacy recommendation, dated 02/07/24, revealed the pharmacy recommendation that this medication was not recommended to be used for Parkinson's associated dementia. The recommendation was to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-25 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to timely address all pharmacy recommendations. This affected one (Resident #31) of five residents reviewed for medication administration. The census was 69. Findings Include: Resident #31 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Her diagnoses were Parkinson's disease, psychosis, hypertensive heart disease, chronic kidney disease (stage III), heart failure, old myocardial infarction, osteoarthritis, syncope and collapse, major depressive disorder, hyperlipidemia, hypomagnesemia, hypokalemia, mild cognitive impairment, anxiety disorder, dysphagia, cognitive communication deficit, and pain in right shoulder. Review of her minimum data set (MDS) assessment, dated 03/31/24, revealed she was cognitively intact. Review of Resident #31 progress note, dated 10/11/23, revealed nurse practitioner recorded a visit for medication management and psychiatric evaluation. Within this note, there was no evidence to support any signs…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-25 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to keep accurate medical records for two residents (Residents #9 and #48). This affected two residents (Residents #9 and #48) of 21 residents reviewed in the sample. The facility census was 69. Findings include: 1. Review of the closed medical record for Resident #9 revealed an admission date on 02/02/23 and a discharge date of 06/22/24. Medical diagnoses included Alzheimer's Disease, Type II Diabetes Mellitus with unspecified complications, mixed receptive-expressive language disorder, difficulty in walking, unsteadiness on feet, generalized weakness, cognitive communication deficit, and need for assistance with personal care. Review of the annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #9 had impaired cognition and scored three out of 15 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) assessment. Resident #9 required substantial assistance from staff to complete most Activities of Daily…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-06-28 · tag F0569 — isolatedNotify each resident of certain balances and convey resident funds upon discharge, eviction, or death.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on personal funds record review, interview and facility policy and procedure review the facility failed to ensure residents and/or representatives were notified timely and aware of the need to spend-down personal funds once the account balance reached/exceeded the maximum resource limit. This affected two residents (#13 and #38) of five current residents reviewed for facility-managed funds. The facility managed 39 resident personal funds accounts. The total census was 71. Findings include: 1. On 06/23/22 at 6:09 P.M. record review revealed Resident #13 had $3330.04 in the personal fund account, managed by the facility as of 06/23/22. Review of the October through December 2021 quarterly statement revealed the account had been over the Medicaid limit since 10/08/21 when the account had $4012.06 ($12.06 over the funds limit allowed taking into account the grace period for government stimulus checks). Review of her last quarterly statement revealed from January 2022 through March 2022 revealed the resident's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-06-28 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, facility policy and procedure review and interview the facility failed to notify Resident #6's representative when the resident experienced a skin tear on the arm requiring treatment. This affected one resident (#6) of 21 sampled residents reviewed for notification. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #6 revealed an admission date of 06/01/21. A Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment, dated 03/10/22 revealed the resident had short and long term memory impairment and received Hospice services. An event note, dated 06/07/22 at 6:42 A.M. revealed the aide alerted the nurse Resident #6 had a skin tear on her right forearm. The resident was unable to state what caused the skin tear. The area was cleansed and a dry clean dressing applied. A physician's order was obtained on 06/07/22 to cleanse the right forearm with normal saline and cover with foam dressing. The dressing was to be changed every three days. The event note documented the resident representative was notified on 06/07/22 at 6:42 A.M. On 06/21/22 at 2:50 P.M.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-06-28 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, facility policy and procedure review and interview the facility failed to ensure an allegation of rape, involving Resident #9 was thoroughly investigated and included written details of the total circumstances of the allegation being made. This affected one resident (#9 of three residents reviewed in facility self-reported incidents (SRIs). Findings include: Review of Resident #9's medical record revealed a 09/08/21 admission date with diagnoses including dementia without behavioral disturbance, multiple subsegmental pulmonary emboli without acute cor pulmonale, occlusion and stenosis of left carotid artery, major depressive disorder, single episode, hypertension, constipation, shortness of breath, disorientation, and syncope and collapse. A 03/23/22 quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment revealed the resident was independent for daily decision making, required staff supervision set up assistance for bed mobility and transfers and was independent for ambulation. Review of the resident's plan of care revealed no plan of care had been developed related…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-06-28 · tag F0625 — isolatedNotify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on closed record review, facility policy and procedure review and interview the facility failed to ensure Resident #70 was provided a notice of the facility bed hold policy prior to a hospital transfer. This affected one resident (#70) of one resident reviewed for hospitalization. Findings include: Review of Resident #70's closed medical record revealed an admission date of 05/04/22 with diagnoses including hemiplegia, and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction affecting left non dominant side. facial weakness, hypertensive heart, congestive heart failure, chronic kidney disease stage 3, atherosclerotic heart failure, atrial fibrillation, chronic pulmonary edema and osteoporosis. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment, dated 05/10/22 revealed the resident was moderately impaired for daily decision making, was sad two to six days with a poor appetite and had trouble concentrating twelve to fourteen days of the review period. The assessment revealed the resident required limited assistance from one staff for bed mobility, transfers, personal hygiene,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-06-28 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview the facility failed to develop a comprehensive psychotropic plan of care identifying target behaviors related to the use of antipsychotic, anti-anxiety and antidepressant medications for Resident #50. This affected one resident (#50) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medication use. Findings include: Review of Resident #50's medical record revealed a 04/29/21 admission with diagnoses including dementia without behavioral disturbance, multi-system degeneration of the autonomic nervous system, orthostatic hypotension, major depressive disorder, single episode, Type 2 diabetes mellitus with diabetic neuropathy, psychosis not due to a substance or known physiological condition, severe protein-calorie malnutrition, anxiety disorder, diverticulosis of intestine (part unspecified) without perforation or abscess without bleeding, gastroesophageal reflux disease without esophagitis, allergic rhinitis, dizziness and giddiness and repeated falls. Review of the 05/12/22 annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment revealed the resident was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-06-28 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview the facility failed to ensure non-pressure related wound care was provided for a surgical wound for Resident #168 and a skin tear for Resident #6 as ordered. This affected two residents (#6 and #168) of two residents reviewed for non-pressure skin conditions. Findings include: 1. A review of Resident #168's medical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including orthopedic aftercare following a surgical amputation, an acquired absence of the left leg above the knee, chronic total occlusion of an artery of the extremities and peripheral vascular disease. A review of Resident #168's physician's orders revealed an order, dated 06/17/22 to cleanse left above knee amputation (LAKA) incision with soap and water, pat dry, and apply a dry clean dressing wrapping it with Kerlix daily and as needed (PRN) until his follow up with the vascular surgeon on 06/30/22. A review of Resident #168's admission/ 5 day Minimum Data Set (MDS)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-06-28 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, facility policy and procedure review and interview the facility failed to adequately assess a pressure ulcer for Resident #67 to identify the proper stage of the ulcer. This affected one resident (#67) of two residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. Findings include: A review of Resident #67's medical record revealed the resident was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE]. He was hospitalized on [DATE] and was readmitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #67 had diagnoses including a fracture of the second and third lumbar vertebrae, morbid obesity and adult onset diabetes mellitus. A review of Resident #67's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment, dated 05/30/22 revealed the resident was assessed to be at risk for pressure ulcers and also had an unhealed pressure ulcer. The unhealed pressure ulcer was noted to be a Stage II pressure ulcer (partial thickness loss of dermis presenting as a shallow open ulcer with a red or pink wound bed, without slough that…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-06-28 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, facility policy and procedure review and interview the facility failed to ensure fall prevention interventions were implemented as planned for Resident #14 and Resident #51 to decrease the residents' risk of falls. This affected two residents (#14 and #51) of four residents reviewed for falls. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #51's medical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including myocardial infarction, hypertropic cardiomyopathy, Alzheimer's disease late onset, unspecified dementia with behavioral disturbance, mood disorder due to known physiological condition, mixed receptive-expressive language disorder, unspecified psychosis not due to substance or known psychological condition. Deficiency of B vitamin, hypothyroidism, history of falling, osteoarthritis, hypertension, dry eye syndrome. cognitive communication deficit, difficulty walking, muscle weakness, constipation, dysphasia and altered mental status. A review…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-06-28 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, facility policy and procedure review and interview the facility failed to ensure Resident #49's weights were obtained as recommended by the dietician to adequately monitor the resident's nutritional status and to identify a significant weight loss in a timely manner. This affected one resident (#49) of three residents reviewed for nutrition. Findings include: A review of Resident #49's medical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including adult onset diabetes mellitus, depression, anxiety, anemia, Vitamin D deficiency, hyperlipidemia and rheumatoid arthritis. A review of Resident #49's nutrition admission assessment, dated 05/10/22 revealed the resident's current body weight was 195 pounds upon admission. The weight was stable with the weight obtained in the hospital. The dietician indicated the facility would monitor the resident's weight trends and weekly weights were ordered. Interventions listed as part of the nutrition admission…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-06-28 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, facility policy and procedure review and interview the facility failed to identify and/or monitor and measure specific targeted behaviors, perform Abnormal Involuntary Movement Scale (AIMS) testing and/or complete gradual dose reductions as required for the use of psychotropic medication to ensure psychotropic medications were justified and administered at the lowest effective dose for each resident. This affected three residents (#41, #50 and #51) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medication use. The facility identified 55 residents who received psychoactive medications. The facility census was 71. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #50's medical record revealed a 04/29/21 admission with diagnoses including dementia without behavioral disturbance, multi-system degeneration of the autonomic nervous system, orthostatic hypotension, major depressive disorder, single episode, Type 2 diabetes mellitus with diabetic neuropathy, psychosis not due to a substance or known physiological condition, severe protein-calorie malnutrition, anxiety…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$54,030 in federal fines across 2 penalties.
- $37,229 — penalty dated 2025-07-29
- $16,801 — penalty dated 2024-06-25
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to TRILOGY HEALTH SERVICES — 123 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 1 of 5 | 4.2 | -3.2 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 2 of 5 | 3.5 | -1.5 vs chain |
| Staffing | 1 of 5 | 3.3 | -2.3 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 4 of 5 | 4.8 | -0.8 vs chain |
The other 122 homes this chain runs (chain average 4.2★, per CMS)
Showing 40 of 122; lowest-rated first.
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CONTINENTAL MERGER SUB LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 10/01/2021 |
| NORTHSTAR HEALTHCARE INCOME INC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 10/01/2021 |
| NORTHSTAR HEALTHCARE INCOME OPERATING PARTNERSHIP LP | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 10/01/2021 |
| TRILOGY HOLDINGS NT-HCI, LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 10/01/2021 |
| CORBIN, KATHY | Individual | W-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE | — | since 02/25/2011 |
| FIGHTMASTER, LISA | Individual | W-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE | — | since 12/01/2015 |
| BARNEY, LEIGH | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 11/01/2019 |
| BRYANT, WILLIAM | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 01/05/2016 |
| BUFFORD, RANDALL | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 11/01/2019 |
| CONNER, GREGORY | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 06/03/2021 |
| DAVIS, DAVID | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 08/21/2017 |
| MEHAFFEY, TODD | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 01/31/2022 |
| PIETROWSKI, CRISTINA | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 01/31/2022 |
| PROSKY, DANNY | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 11/01/2019 |
| STREIFF, MATHIEU | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 11/01/2019 |
| TRILOGY MANAGEMENT SERVICES LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 10/01/2021 |
| GUTHRIE, MEGAN | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 10/21/2020 |
5 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $1.3M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 14% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in OH
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Ohio Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 366051. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-07-29, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.