Sun Prairie Senior Living

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

53.7% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 58 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 65.5% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 84 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.35 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 60% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 2% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 52 beds and averages 34.7 residents a day — about 67% occupied, or roughly 17 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.70 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.70 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.02 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.51 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.78 on weekdays — 7% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.80 to 0.44 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 58% is well above the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

31 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 20 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · G2023-11-30 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure that 1 (R19) of 12 residents out of a total sample of 14 residents received assessment and appropriate and timely medical care with a change in medical condition. R19 had an unwitnessed fall on 10/21/23 at 6:15 PM. R19 experienced change of condition and the facility failed to properly assess range of motion (ROM)/change in ambulation ability on 10/21/23. The facility failed to identify change in resident when resident experienced the inability to move right leg and increased weakness on 10/21/23 and the morning of 10/22/23. R19 went to emergency room on [DATE] at 11:00 AM and was diagnosed with a right hip fracture. Evidenced by The facility policy titled, Notification of Change in Condition, with a revision date of 12/31/22, states, in part; .PURPOSE to ensure appropriate individuals are notified of change in condition. The facility must inform the resident, consult with the resident's physician and if known notify the resident's legal…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-04-01 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility did not maintain a safe and sanitary environment in which food is prepared, stored, and distributed. This has the potential to affect all 34 residents who reside in the facility.Surveyor observed cereal spilled on the floor and an open container for storing dry pasta in the kitchen pantry.Surveyor observed milk temperatures to be out of range on room trays being delivered to residents for lunch.Surveyor observed sanitizing solution to test outside of the recommended range for parts per million (ppm) concentration.Surveyor observed male staff to have facial hair and to be working with resident food without hair restraints in place.Surveyor observed a refrigerator for resident snacks to be broken with melted, warm food inside of the refrigerator and freezer. This is evidenced by: Example - Pantry foodSurveyor requested a food safety policy, but the facility was unable to provide one.The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Food Code 2022, includes in part: Food Storage . Food shall be protected from contamination by…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-01 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure each resident had a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment or ensure housekeeping provided necessary services to maintain a sanitary, orderly, and comfortable area for 2 of 16 sampled residents (R4 & R44). R4 reported to Surveyor that their divider curtain was soiled and that their carpet had not been vacuumed. R44 reported that their toilet overflows and no one will fix it. Evidenced by: Facility did not provide a policy on housekeeping. Example 1: R4 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that include end stage renal disease, congestive heart failure, and type 2 diabetes mellitus. R4's most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] states that R4 has a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) of 15 out of 15, indicating that R4 is cognitively intact. On 3/29/26 at 9:29 AM, Surveyor interviewed R4. R4 reported to Surveyor that their room divider curtain was soiled, and it grosses out their visitors.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-01 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not make prompt efforts to document, investigate, and resolve grievances a resident may have for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for grievances (R26). R26's Activated Power of Attorney (APOA) expressed concerns regarding R26 not getting out of bed for activities and that R26 had a broken wheelchair. The facility failed to provide a written resolution to R26's APOA. Evidenced by:The facility policy titled Resident Concern Process last reviewed 12/16/24 states in part .4. The facility staff will follow these basic steps in response to a complaint: *Listen to the concern without interruption *Thank the person who brought the concern to staff * Apologize to the person bringing the concern and acknowledge that what happened is not our standard * Not make excuses for why or how this has happened * Take steps to correct the problem *Make the problem their own by following up to make sure it is resolved and stays resolved *Any concern that is suspected to be abuse,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-01 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure that all alleged violations involving abuse, neglect, exploitation, or mistreatment, are reported immediately to the administrator of the facility and to other officials, including the State Survey Agency, in accordance with State law through established procedures for 1 of 16 Residents (R43) reviewed for abuse.R43 and FM G (Family Member) reported an allegation of abuse and the facility did not submit a report to the State Agency (SA).Evidenced by:The facility's Abuse and Neglect Procedural Guidelines policy, dated 8/29/19, states, in part: Facility has developed and implemented processes, which strive to ensure the prevention and reporting of suspected or alleged resident abuse and neglect. 1. The facility has implemented processes in an effort to provide a comfortable and safe environment. 2. The Executive Director and Director of Health Services are responsible for the implementation and ongoing monitoring of abuse standards and procedures.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-01 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
  Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure it had evidence that an alleged violation was thoroughly investigated for 2 of 16 Residents (R27 and R34) reviewed for abuse. Facility did not thoroughly investigate an allegation of abuse (resident-to-resident) for R27 and R34. Evidenced by: Facility Policy entitled 'Abuse, Neglect and Exploitation Procedural Guidelines, states in part: .The facility has developed and implemented processes, which strive to ensure the prevention and reporting of suspected or alleged resident abuse and neglect. Procedures: The facility has implemented processes in an effort to provide a comfortable and safe environment. The Executive Director (also known as NHA A, Nursing Home Administrator) and Director of Health Services are responsible for the implementation and ongoing monitoring of abuse standards and procedures. Physical Abuse - includes, but is not limited to, hitting, slapping, punching, biting, and kicking. Resident to resident abuse with or without cause.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-01 · tag F0641 — isolated
  Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that the assessments must accurately reflect the resident's status for 1 of 16 residents' (R5) Minimum Data Sets (MDS) reviewed for accuracy. R5's MDS dated [DATE] does not have her pressure injury (PI; localized damage to skin and underlying tissue caused by prolonged pressure) coded correctly. This is evidenced by: The Facility does not have a Policy and Procedure for MDS accuracy. The Facility follows the Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) manual. Long-Term Care Facility Resident Assessment Instrument 3.0 User's Manual dated 10/23, documents the following, in part: .The RAI process has multiple regulatory requirements. Federal regulations at 42 CFR (Code of Federal Regulations) 483.20 (b)(1)(xviii), (g), and (h) require that (1) the assessment accurately reflects the resident's status . On 7/16/25 Hospice identified, assessed and measured R5's PI's as follows: Pt (patient) now has a 9.0 x 17.3 cm (centimeter) open area that at the coccyx…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-01 · tag F0645 — isolated
  PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not follow through with the appropriate steps of the Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) process for 1 of 5 residents (R43) reviewed for PASRR screening. R43 did not have a PASRR Level I (1) completed. This is evidenced by: The facility provided the Wisconsin Department of Health Services Forward Health Update, volume 2023-37, dated 11/2023, for their PASRR policy. The Forward Health Update states, in part: Federal regulations.require that all individuals seeking admission to a Medicaid-enrolled nursing facility be screened to determine the presence of a major mental illness and/or developmental disability. Nursing facilities fulfill this requirement by conducting a preadmission Level I screen for anyone who meets the definition of a 'new admission.'. R43 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], was on hospital leave from 2/21/26-3/20/26, and readmitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that include Parkinson's disease (neurological…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-01 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility did not ensure that a resident who is unable to carry out activities of daily living (ADLs) receives the necessary services to maintain good nutrition, grooming, personal and oral hygiene for 2 of 5 sampled Residents (R4 & R41).R4 reported that they have only had 1 shower since their admission to the facility.R41 reported that they have only had 1 shower since their admission to the facility. R41 has facial hair that is approximately 1/4- 1/2 long and facility staff has not shaved R41.Evidenced by:The facility does not have a policy for ADLs (Activities of Daily Living).Example 1R4 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that include end stage renal disease, congestive heart failure, and type 2 diabetes mellitus.R4's most recent MDS (Minimum Data Set) dated 2/25/26 states that R4 has a BIMS (Brief Interview of Mental Status) of 15 out of 15, indicating that R4 is cognitively intact. R4's MDS also states that R4 requires…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-01 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility did not ensure that the resident environment remains as free of accident and hazards as possible for 2 of 4 sampled residents (R27 & R26). Surveyor observed R27's motorized wheelchair (Motorized Assistive Devices) being charged in the conference room. NHA A (Nursing Home Administrator) states the wheelchair should be charged in the Conference Room. Surveyor observed the Conference Room to not have a fire safe door. R26 has an order to be supervised at meals. The facility was not providing supervision with breakfast. Evidenced by The facility did not have a policy for charging electric wheelchair batteries. The facility also did not have a policy for Motorized Assistive Devices. On 3/31/26 at 8:30 AM, Surveyor observed R27's wheelchair battery charging in the conference room while Surveyors were in the conference room. On 3/31/26 at 8:37 AM, Surveyor asked NHA A (Nursing Home Administrator) to walk to conference room with Surveyor. Surveyor showed…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-01 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
  Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure a resident who requires BiPAP respiratory support was provided such care, consistent with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, the residents' goals and preferences for 1 of 1 resident (R4) reviewed with BiPAP.R4 was admitted to the facility with an order for BiPAP; the order was never transcribed and R4 has not received the BiPAP since admission.Evidenced by:The facility does not have a policy for respiratory care.R4 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that include end stage renal disease, congestive heart failure, OSA (Obstructive Sleep Apnea), and type 2 diabetes mellitus.R4's most recent MDS (Minimum Data Set) dated 2/25/26 states that R4 has a BIMS (Brief Interview of Mental Status) of 15 out of 15, indicating that R4 is cognitively intact.R4's hospital discharge orders dated 2/2/26 state in part .BiPAP/NPPV (Bilevel positive airway pressure/Non-invasive positive…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to TRILOGY HEALTH SERVICES — 123 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 26 rows in the source record cover these 21 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

9 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $329K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in WI