Cumberland Pointe Health Campus

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

53.3% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 115 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 76.1% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 46 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.46 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 77% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 7% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 71 beds and averages 58.7 residents a day — about 83% occupied, or roughly 12 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.22 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.72 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.99 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.91 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.35 on weekdays — 13% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.79 to 0.54 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 47% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are unchanged from the previous inspection. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

28 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 17 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · G2025-06-16 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident was kept safe during care and was evaluated for assistive devices to prevent an accident for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for accidents. (Resident 19) This deficient practice resulted in a right femoral neck fracture, a left scalp laceration, and a hematoma of the frontal scalp for Resident 19. Findings include: During an interview, on 6/12/25 at 3:40 p.m., Resident 19's daughter indicated she was the resident's Power of Attorney (POA) and was never called by the facility to inform her the resident had fallen. She heard about the fall from a Home Health Aide (HHA 6) she had hired for extra help to make sure the resident received all the care he needed. Resident 19's bed was up at waist level, and the resident was on his side when he fell off the bed and was found face down. This happened on a Sunday, and the facility did not call her. She found out from HHA 6. The resident was sent to the hospital and had surgery for his broken hip. He had a busted lip, hematoma on his forehead, multiple bruises and skin…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-06-16 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  2. The clinical record for Resident 29 was reviewed on 6/10/25 at 3:06 p.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, diabetes type 2, cardiomegaly, hypertension, obesity, and age-related physical debility. A current physician's order, dated 12/22/21, indicated Resident 29 had a full code status. A care plan, dated 12/23/21, indicated advanced directives would be reviewed quarterly and honor Resident 29's medical POA's decisions. An Indiana Physicians Orders for Scope of Treatment (POST) form, dated 4/9/24, was signed by Resident 29's power of attorney (POA) and indicated the resident's code status was DNR (do not resuscitate). It was not signed by a physician. During an interview, on 6/11/25 at 10:00 a.m., Resident 29 indicated she wanted to be a DNR. During an interview, on 6/16/25 at 11:07 a.m., the Executive Director (ED) indicated the form should have been given to the physician to complete after it was filled out by the POA and the code status should have been updated to reflect Resident 29's wishes. A current facility policy, titled Guidelines for Advanced Directives,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-16 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
  Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  2. The clinical record for Resident 29 was reviewed on 6/10/25 at 3:06 p.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, diabetes type 2, cardiomegaly, hypertension, obesity, and age-related physical debility. A quarterly MDS assessment was completed on 2/22/25. There was no documentation in the clinical record, a care plan meeting for the quarterly assessment was completed. An annual MDS assessment was completed on 5/22/25. There was no documentation in the clinical record, a care plan meeting for the annual assessment was completed. During an interview, on 6/16/25 at 11:06 a.m., the DON indicated care plan meetings should be completed on admission and quarterly. There should have been two care planning meetings completed. A current facility policy, titled Resident's First Meeting Guidelines, dated 3/7/19 and received from the DON on 6/16/25 at 11:57 a.m., indicated .Subsequent meetings for non-Medicare residents should be conducted at a minimum of quarterly and with significant change .Subsequent meetings for Medicare residents should be conducted minimally quarterly and prior…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-16 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a blood pressure medication was administered according to the physician's orders for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for quality of care. (Resident 19) Findings include: The clinical record for Resident 19 was reviewed on 6/8/25 at 11:07 a.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, congestive heart failure, dementia, diabetes mellitus, and hypertension. A care plan, dated 4/24/25, indicated Resident 19 had a potential for cardiovascular distress related to congestive heart failure. The approaches included, but were not limited to, medications as ordered, observe and report side effects, and observe for signs and symptoms of cardiovascular distress. A physician's order, dated 5/20/25, indicated to give furosemide (a diuretic medication which could lower blood pressure) 20 milligrams (mg) daily and to hold the medication for a systolic blood pressure less than 120. The Medication Administration Record (MAR), dated 5/1/25 through 6/4/25, indicated furosemide 20 mg was given out of the physician ordered parameters…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-06-16 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
  Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure physician's orders for the care and monitoring of a catheter were obtained upon admission for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for catheter. (Resident 104) Findings include: The clinical record for Resident 104 was reviewed on 6/12/25 at 1:55 p.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, chronic kidney disease, diabetes mellitus, urinary tract infection, myoglobinuria, and urogenital implants. A facility admission observation and data collection form, dated 5/25/25 at 7:45 a.m., indicated the resident was admitted with an indwelling catheter. A care plan, dated 5/26/25, indicated the resident had a catheter. The approaches included, but were not limited to, record urinary output and provide care and change catheter per the physician's orders. Physician's orders related to the catheter, the catheter care, and catheter monitoring were not ordered until 5 days after the resident was admitted to the facility. During an interview, on 6/16/25 at 10:25 a.m., the Director of Nursing (DON) indicated standing orders should…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-06-16 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolated
  Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff followed the physician's orders related to a gastrostomy tube (g-tube) for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for gastrostomy tubes. (Resident 43) Findings include: The clinical record for Resident 43 was reviewed on 6/11/25 at 1:45 p.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, gastrostomy status, type 2 diabetes mellitus with diabetic chronic kidney disease, and diverticulosis of the large intestine. A physician's order, dated 2/13/25, indicated to flush the g-tube with 30 ml (milliliters) of water three times a day. A nursing progress note, dated 2/14/25 at 4:02 p.m., indicated Resident 43 and family were in agreement they did not want to proceed with supplementation through the g-tube. A physician's order, dated 3/20/25, indicated to administer 120 ml of the dietary supplement Med Pass 2.0 three times a day. There was no administration route indicated in the physician's order for the Med Pass. A nursing progress note, dated 6/7/25 at 8:47 p.m., written by Registered Nurse (RN) 2 indicated .Writer administered…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-06-16 · tag F0694 — isolated
  Provide for the safe, appropriate administration of IV fluids for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based interview and record review, the facility failed to implement physician's orders based upon current professional standards of practice for the maintenance and prevention of infection of an Intravenous (IV) line for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for IV therapy. (Resident 101) Findings include: The clinical record for Resident 101 was reviewed on 6/11/25 at 9:59 a.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, immunodeficiency, benign neoplasm of meninges (non-cancerous tumor) and osteonecrosis (the death of bone tissue due to a lack of blood supply). A physician's order, dated 6/6/25 and discontinued 6/10/25, indicated to give ceftriaxone (an antibiotic) reconstitute solution 2 grams via IV daily. The only physician's order related to the IV was for the antibiotic. There were no physician's orders for the care and use of the pumps, tubing, syringes, or flushes. The Electronic Health Record did not have documentation of IV site assessments, normal saline flushes, Heparin lock flushes, monitoring for side effects, or PICC dressing changes until 6/9/25. A care plan, dated 6/8/25,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-06-16 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
  Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a physician's order for oxygen was in place and oxygen equipment was stored properly when not in use for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for respiratory care. (Resident 1) Findings include: During an observation, on 6/9/25 at 11:09 a.m., Resident 1 was in bed with an oxygen concentrator next to the bed. The concentrator was set on 3 liters (L) and was connected to a nasal cannula. Resident 1 was not wearing the nasal cannula, and it was laying on the floor. During an observation, on 6/10/25 at 9:57 a.m., Resident 1 was lying in bed. The oxygen concentrator was set on 3L. Resident 1 was not wearing the nasal cannula, and it was laying on the floor. During an observation, on 6/11/25 at 11:34 a.m., Resident 1 was lying in bed. The resident was wearing the nasal cannula and was receiving oxygen at 3L. The clinical record for Resident 1 was reviewed on 6/9/25 at 1:05 p.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, acute and chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia, acute diastolic heart failure, chronic…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-04-25 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
  Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure pharmaceutical services were provided to meet the needs of the residents for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for pharmacy services. This deficient practice was corrected on 1/24/25, prior to the start of the survey, and therefore was past noncompliance. (Resident D) Findings include: During an interview, on 4/23/25 at 12:49 p.m., Resident D indicated she did not receive all the medications she was supposed to receive while she was at the facility. Some of her medications were given very late. The staff told her the medications were not given because they were not received from the pharmacy. The clinical record for Resident D was reviewed on 4/24/25 at 2:02 p.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, pneumonia, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, pulmonary fibrosis, congestive heart failure and chronic atrial fibrillation. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment indicated the resident was cognitively intact. The Medication Administration Record (MAR) indicated the following: 1. Alprazolam (an anti-anxiety…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-06-10 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — pattern
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide a bowel stimulant according to the bowel protocol, failed to ensure residents were wearing compression hose as ordered by the physician, failed to hold a medication per the physician's hold orders, and failed to ensure a preventive cushion was in place for 4 of 4 residents reviewed for quality of care. (Residents 43, 44, 15 and 25) Findings include: 1. The record for Resident 43 was reviewed on 6/4/24 at 3:44 p.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, metabolic encephalopathy (a problem in the brain, caused by a chemical imbalance in the blood) and constipation. a. The bowel record was reviewed and did not include documentation of a bowel movement between 2/11/24 to 2/14/24 (4 days). The Medication Administration Record, for February 2024, did not have documentation to show the resident received the PRN (as needed) bowel stimulants to promote bowel movements. The bowel protocol was not initiated. A physician's order, initiated on 2/7/24, indicated if there was no bowel movement within 72…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-06-10 · tag F0642 — isolated
  Ensure a qualified health professional conducts resident assessments.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a PASARR (Preadmission Screening and Resident Review) level 2 was accurately documented on the comprehensive/annual MDS (Minimum Data Set) assessment submitted for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for PASRR level 2. (Resident 34) Finding includes: The clinical record for Resident 34 was reviewed on 6/5/24 at 10:00 a.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, cerebral palsy, major depressive disorder, bipolar disorder, anxiety disorder, and insomnia. A PASARR level 2 was completed on 9/12/23. An annual MDS assessment, dated 12/25/23, indicated a PASARR level 2 had not been completed. During an interview, on 6/7/24 at 11:12 a.m., the MDS Clinical Support nurse indicated the MDS assessment should have been marked to indicate the level 2 had been completed During an interview, on 6/7/24 at 11:30 a.m., the MDS Clinical Support nurse indicated the facility followed the RAI manual as a policy. 3.1-31(f)

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to TRILOGY HEALTH SERVICES — 123 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 34 rows in the source record cover these 31 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

18 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $1.3M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 12% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in IN