Villages At Oak Ridge, The
1694 Troy Road, Washington, IN 47501 · Government - County · 58 certified beds · (812) 254-3800 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home’s record is mixed — some reassuring signs, some worth asking about.
- a middle-of-the-pack inspection score (3/5)
- no harm-level citations in the current inspection record
- no federal fines or payment denials on record
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 3 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 3 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 4 of 5 |
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 4 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 3 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 4 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 4 to 3 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 19.3% | 11.0% | 15.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 6.8% | 5.5% | 5.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.0% | 0.4% | 0.9% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 2.0% | 1.1% | 2.0% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 0.8% | 25.2% | 6.5% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 6.5% | 3.9% | 3.3% | worse |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 20.0% | 11.9% | 16.1% | worse |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 30.0% | 23.5% | 18.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 97.7% | 95.4% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 1.2% | 3.6% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 21.6% | 23.3% | 21.2% | typical |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 5.2% | 13.6% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 0.0% | 1.2% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 82.5% | 79.0% | 79.4% | typical |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 29.9% | 22.2% | 22.6% | worse |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 26.2% | 10.8% | 12.0% | worse |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 2.30 | 1.61 | 1.67 | worse |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 2.35 | 1.44 | 1.80 | worse |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
60.2% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 130 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 66.7% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 75 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.40 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 68% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 0% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 60.2%CMS range 51.5–67.3 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | better than U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 9.7%CMS range 6.5–13.5 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 66.7% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 66.7% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 61.3% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 100.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 100.0% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | 100.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 1.8% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 0.9% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 5.8%CMS range 3.1–9.4 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 0.97 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 58 beds and averages 47.8 residents a day — about 82% occupied, or roughly 10 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.66 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.94 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.14 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.15 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.87 on weekdays — 19% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.06 to 0.66 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 51% is about the same as the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
14 citations, most serious first — scroll within the box to see all.
- Potential for harm · D2026-04-14 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure care and services were provided to treat pressure ulcers for 1 of 3 new admisstions reviewed for quality of care. Staff identified a new pressure ulcer but did not assess the wound or obtain new treatment orders for three days. (Resident C)Finding includes:During record review on 4/14/26 at 10:30 A.M., Resident C's diagnoses included, but were not limited to, lumbar fracture, polyneuropathy, muscle weakness, need for personal assistance with care, and cognitive communication deficit. Resident C's most recent admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 3/2/26, indicated the resident had moderate cognitive impairment, was dependent for mobility, had no unhealed pressure wounds, and was at risk for developing pressure ulcers. Resident C's care plan included but was not limited to:At risk for skin breakdown due to episodes of incontinence and assistance required for mobility/positioning tasks due to decline in functional mobility (started 3/17/26).Resident has a pressure ulcer to left buttock…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-07-24 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to prevent falls for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for accidents. Following multiple falls, a resident care plan interventions were not in place to prevent an additional fall. (Resident C)Findings include: During record review on 2/26/25 at 11:15 A.M., Resident C's diagnoses included, but were not limited to, repeated falls, chronic pain, and depression.Resident C's most recent admission Minimal Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 5/2/25, indicated the resident had moderate cognitive impairment, used a walker for mobilization, and had one-sided upper extremity impairment. Resident C's physician orders included but were not limited to: call light attendant to bed, check placement and function every shift (started 5/11/25).Resident C's care plan included, but was not limited to, the resident at risk for falls due to falls at home with minor injury, antidepressant medications, altered balance and coordination (started 4/29/25). Fall interventions included but were not limited to; call light attendant to bed, check…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-04-02 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — patternProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure appropriate care and services were provided to prevent urinary tract infections for residents with urinary catheters or were incontinent of bladder for 4 of 4 residents reviewed for incontinence/catheter care. (Resident B, Resident E, Resident D, Resident C) Findings include: 1. On 3/31/25 at 9:57 A.M., Resident B's clinical record was reviewed. Resident was admitted [DATE]. Diagnosis included, but were not limited to, dementia and kidney failure. The most recent admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 3/17/25, indicated a severe cognitive impairment and no behaviors. Resident was dependent on staff for eating, toileting, and bathing. Resident frequently incontinent of bladder, and did not have a urinary catheter at admission. Physician orders included, but were not limited to: May dip urine with signs and symptoms of urinary tract infection (UTI), then may send urine for culture and sensitivity (C&S) if positive for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-04-02 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — patternProvide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure sufficient nursing staff was provided for 7 of 7 days reviewed and 1 of 1 Resident Council meeting. Oxygen orders were not in place, catheter care was not provided, antibiotics given were not indicated for uti, and showers were not given. (Resident 33, Resident E, Resident B, Resident D, Resident C) Finding includes: 1. During the survey dates of 3/25/25 through 4/2/25, the following interviews were completed. a. The confidential interview indicated it was dependent on the hall assigned and if everyone showed up whether there was enough help or not. She frequently stayed after her shift ended to chart. They indicated it would be better and they could get all tasks done if there were two aides on each hall (100/Locked Dementia Unit, 200/TCU, and 300) or at least a float Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) that would be available as needed. b. The confidential interview indicated they were not able to get a break or get a lunch. They indicated there were a lot of call in's. Staff would try to call others to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-04-02 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure infection control practices were implemented for a safe, sanitary and comfortable environment to help prevent the development and transmission of disease and infection for 2 of 2 random observations. (100 Hall, 300 Hall) Findings include: 1. On 4/1/25 at 10:14 A.M., a laundry cart was observed against a wall on the 100 Hall. Clothes were observed on hangers hanging from the top of the cart and folded items observed in the bottom basket. The cart was not covered. Laundry 3 and Laundry 7 were observed wheeling the cart down the hall while the clothes on the hangers were rubbing against the wall, resident doors, and hand sanitizer dispensers. Laundry 3 and Laundry 7 were observed taking the folded items from the basket and hugging them against their uniform tops taking them into the resident rooms. 2. On 4/1/25 at 2:14 P.M., Laundry 7 was observed on the 300 Hall holding resident clothing against her uniform top and entering room…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-02 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents requiring assistance with Activities of Daily Living (ADLs) received adequate assistance with bathing for 2 of 2 residents reviewed for ADL care. (Resident C, Resident J) Findings Include: 1. During an interview on 3/25/25 at 10:41 A.M., Resident J indicated she received showers once a week. On 4/01/25 at 10:57 A.M., Resident J's clinical record was reviewed. Diagnoses included, but was not limited to anemia, coronary artery disease, and depression. The most recent Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 2/12/25 indicated Resident J had moderate cognitive impairment and required moderate assistance with bathing. A current care plan, initiated on 6/14/2022, was provided and indicated Resident J required staff assistance to complete ADL tasks completely and safely. Resident J's care plan lacked information on functional status related to bathing. On 4/2/25 at 10:00 A.M., Resident J's shower record from 1/1/25 to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-04-02 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide care consistent with professional standards of practice for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for respiratory care. A resident's order for oxygen supplementation was not followed. (Resident 7) Finding includes: On 3/25/25 at 11:09 A.M., Resident 7 was laying sideways in bed wearing oxygen per nasal cannula with the oxygen concentration machine indicator between 2.5-3 liters per minute (LPM). On 3/28/25 at 9:53 A.M., Resident 7 was sitting in her room in a Broda chair asleep wearing oxygen per nasal cannula. The oxygen concentrator on the portable tank was set on 3 LPM. On 4/2/25 at 10:35 A.M., Resident 7's Broda chair was in the resident's private bathroom and the nasal cannula tubing was hanging over the Broda chair, uncovered. On 3/31/25 at 11:51 A.M., Resident 7's clinical record was reviewed. Diagnoses included, congestive heart failure and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). The most recent Discharge Minimum Data Set (MDS),…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-20 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that appropriate treatment and services were provided to prevent UTIs (urinary tract infections) for a resident with a nephrostomy tube (a flexible tube that drains urine from the kidney into a bag outside the body) for 1 of 1 residents reviewed for UTI. A resident's MDS (Minimum Data Set) Assessment was incorrectly coded, the clinical record lacked a resident centered care plan, an antibiotic was ordered for 5 days and given for 6 days, and the resident did not follow up with specialists. (Resident B) Findings include: During an observation on 9/20/24 at 1:50 P.M., Resident B was in bed. At that time, Resident B indicated she had a nephrostomy tube for 2 years and she was in and out of the hospital often due to UTIs. She indicated she occasionally sat in a wet brief until staff came to assist. Resident B indicated the nursing facility would only change the dressing on the nephrostomy tube on shower days or when the dressing fell…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-03-27 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — patternProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure Activities of Daily Living (ADLs) were provided for dependent residents for 4 of 4 residents reviewed for ADLs. Residents did not receive showers at least twice per week. (Resident 15, Resident 107, Resident 51, Resident 44) Findings include: 1. On 3/19/24 at 11:00 A.M., Resident 15 was observed with greasy, unbrushed hair. On 3/21/24 at 10:17 A.M., Resident 15 was observed sitting in the common area with greasy, unbrushed hair. On 3/25/24 at 9:22 A.M., Resident 15 was observed sitting in the common area with unbrushed hair. On 3/21/24 at 11:24 A.M., Resident 15's clinical record was reviewed. Diagnosis included, but were not limited to, dementia. The most recent Quarterly MDS (Minimum Data Set) Assessment, dated 1/12/24, indicated cognitive status unable to be assessed, and no refusals or rejection of care. Resident 15's clinical record lacked care plans and/or current physician orders related to providing assistance for showers or rejection of care. Resident 15's progress notes lacked refusals of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-03-27 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure each resident was treated with respect and dignity for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for dignity. Resident was being fed at the nurse's station. (Resident 47) Findings include: On 3/19/24 at 9:30 A.M., upon entrance to the facility, CNA 33 was standing at the 300 hall nurse's station feeding Resident 47, who was sitting in a wheelchair. On 3/25/24 at 11:21 A.M., Resident 47's clinical records were reviewed. She was admitted on [DATE]. Diagnosis included, but were not limited to, cerebral palsy, epilepsy, and dysphagia. The most current Significant Change in Condition MDS (Minimum Data Set) Assessment, dated 2/5/24 indicated Resident 47's cognitive status was unable to be assessed, extensive assistance of two was needed for bed mobility, transfers and toilet use, and extensive assistance of one was needed for eating. Physician's orders included, but were not limited to the following: Diet: Fortified Foods (therapeutic), Pureed (Texture),…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-03-27 · tag F0554 — isolatedAllow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure assessments were completed for a resident that self administered medications for 2 of 2 random observations. A resident was observed in a room alone with a medication cup containing pills. (Resident 34) Findings include: On 3/19/24 at 10:25 A.M., Resident 34 was observed sitting in her room. Two medication cups were observed stacked together with applesauce in the top one, and a blue capsule in the bottom one. On 3/19/24 at 11:51 A.M., Resident 34's room was observed with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) 21. At that time, Resident 34 was in the dining room. To medication cups were observed still stacked together with applesauce in the top one, and the following medications in the bottom one: 1 round white tablet 1 blue capsule 1 round rust colored tablet 1 oval peach tablet with a 5 on one side At that time, LPN 21 indicated the medications were not supposed to be in the room, and were probably Resident 34's morning medications. On 3/19/24 at 12:00 P.M., Resident 34's clinical record was reviewed.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-03-27 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to implement the care plan for 2 of 2 residents reviewed for implementation of a care plan. The facility failed to fill the oxygen humidification bottle for one resident and failed to give a medication to one resident. (Resident 30, Resident 29) Findings include: 1. On 3/19/24 at 10:59 A.M., Resident 30 was observed lying in bed with her eyes closed. Oxygen (O2) tubing was lying on the floor, the humidification bottle was empty and the oxygen machine was on at 4 l/min (liters per minute). On 3/20/24 at 10:04 A.M., Resident 30's humidification bottle on the oxygen machine was empty. At that time, RN 27 indicated the humidification bottles were changed as needed, usually on the night shift. After she replaced the empty bottle, she indicated she checked the bottles routinely but missed this one. On 3/21/24 at 9:50 A.M., Resident 30's clinical records were reviewed. Diagnosis included, but were not limited to chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, pulmonary fibrosis, and other pulmonary collapse. The most current…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-03-27 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain safe and secure storage of medications for 1 of 2 medication carts observed. Loose pills were observed in the medication cart. (300 Hall) Findings include: On 3/26/24 at 10:31 A.M., the 300 Hall medication cart was observed with the following loose pills in the drawers: 1 round yellow pill 1 round white pill marked with HH210 on the pill 2 oblong white tablets marked with L484 on the pill 1 round pink pill marked with L21 on the pill 1 round light yellow pill During an interview on 3/26/24 at 10:37 A.M., QMA (Qualified Medication Aide) 23 indicated all nursing staff was responsible to clean out medication carts every other day and loose pills should be disposed of. During an interview on 3/27/24 at 10:26 A.M., the IP (Infection Preventionist) indicated there should not be loose pills in the med cart. On 3/27/24 at 12:20 P.M., the Administrator provided a Medication Storage in the Facility policy, revised 11/18 that indicated, .contaminated, or deteriorated medications and those in containers that are…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-27 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure infection control practices were in place for 1 of 1 residents observed for insulin administration, and 1 of 1 random observation. Staff handled medications with bare hands prior to administering them to a resident, and staff placed an insulin syringe on the sink and an insulin supply case on a resident's catheter bag prior to administration of insulin. (Resident 107, Resident 43) Findings include: 1. On 3/19/24 at 11:14 A.M., Registered Nurse (RN) 3 was observed to prepare medications for administration. RN 3 removed medication cards from the medication cart, popped the pills into her bare other hand, then placed them into a medication cup. RN 3 was then observed to administer the medications to Resident 107. 2. On 3/25/24 at 10:22 A.M., Qualified Medication Aide (QMA) 5 was observed to administer insulin to Resident 43. QMA 5 entered the room, and placed the insulin supply box on top of the resident's catheter bag which was lying on top of his leg at the foot of the bed. QMA 5 then went into the bathroom, placed the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
No federal fines in the current CMS record.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to TRILOGY HEALTH SERVICES — 123 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 3 of 5 | 4.2 | -1.2 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 3 of 5 | 3.5 | -0.5 vs chain |
| Staffing | 3 of 5 | 3.3 | -0.3 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 4 of 5 | 4.8 | -0.8 vs chain |
The other 122 homes this chain runs (chain average 4.2★, per CMS)
Showing 40 of 122; lowest-rated first.
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DAVIESS COUNTY HOSPITAL | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | 100% | since 08/01/2015 |
| TRILOGY OPCO LLC | Organization | DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | — | since 12/01/2015 |
| AMERICAN HEALTHCARE REIT HOLDINGS LP | Organization | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 10/01/2021 |
| AMERICAN HEALTHCARE REIT INC | Organization | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 10/01/2018 |
| TRILOGY HEALTHCARE HOLDINGS INC | Organization | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | — | since 12/01/2015 |
| SETTLES, APRIL | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 01/01/2025 |
| TRILOGY HEALTHCARE OF DAVIESS, LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 08/01/2015 |
| BURLA, KIRAN | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/01/2023 |
| WALLACE, SARAH | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/01/2025 |
| BARNEY, LEIGH | Individual | INDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 09/18/2025 |
| DAVIS, DAVID | Individual | INDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 09/18/2025 |
| TRILOGY REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST | Organization | TRUSTEE OF THE SNF; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 12/01/2015 |
| GAHC3 TRILOGY JV LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 12/01/2015 |
| GAHC4 TRILOGY JV LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 10/01/2018 |
| PARAGON OUTPATIENT REHABILITATION SERVICES LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 12/01/2015 |
| TRILOGY INVESTORS LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 12/01/2015 |
| TRILOGY MANAGEMENT SERVICES LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 12/01/2015 |
| TRILOGY PRO SERVICES LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 09/18/2025 |
| TRILOGY PROPCO II, LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 07/13/2023 |
| TRILOGY PROPERTY HOLDINGS LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 07/13/2023 |
| TRILOGY REAL ESTATE DAVIESS, LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 07/13/2023 |
| TRILOGY REIT HOLDINGS LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 12/01/2015 |
| CORBIN, KATHY | Individual | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 07/01/2015 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 32 rows in the source record cover these 23 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
17 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $1.2M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 13% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in IN
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Indiana Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 155837. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-04-02, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.