No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Homewood Health Campus

2494 N Lebanon St, Lebanon, IN 46052 · For profit - Corporation · 68 certified beds · (765) 482-2076 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (765) 482-2076 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse-prevention, restraint, or reporting citations — no harm found (F0609, F0610) — most recent Aug 2024Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0758)
Insights

The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.

In its favor
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
Worth asking about
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (35) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

2/5
CMS overall
2 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 2 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 2 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 4 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
515 Crown Pointe Dr
Pharmacy
2705 N Lebanon St Ste 100 · (765) 483-3900 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
Aldi0.2 mi
2465 N Lebanon St · (855) 955-2534 · Call to confirm hours
Park
705 Maple Dr · (765) 482-8860 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
610 W County Road 250 N · (765) 482-4673

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 4 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 4 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 3 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 1 to 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating2★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased8.0%11.0%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight5.5%5.5%5.4%typical
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%0.4%0.9%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.6%1.1%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms6.7%25.2%6.5%typical
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.0%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury5.6%3.9%3.3%worse
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened11.8%11.9%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication29.2%23.5%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine96.1%95.4%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers1.1%3.6%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control33.0%23.3%21.2%worse
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table16.8%13.6%17.1%typical
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.0%1.2%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine87.9%79.0%79.4%better
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission30.2%22.2%22.6%worse
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit10.4%10.8%12.0%better
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days1.681.611.67typical
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days1.861.441.80typical

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

49.4% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 68 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

49.4%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
11.4%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
57.7%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.40U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.14hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.18hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.09hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 57.7% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 52 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.40 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 69% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 4% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF49.4%CMS range 41.2–59.151.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF11.4%CMS range 7.4–16.110.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge57.7%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge51.9%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge36.5%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay4.4%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened1.5%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization5.5%CMS range 2.8–10.17.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.081.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.85
RN hours/ resident / day
0.46
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.30
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.61
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.47
RN hoursweekends
51.7%
Total nursing turnover
42.9%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 68 beds and averages 54.6 residents a day — about 80% occupied, or roughly 13 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.61 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.85 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.30 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.19 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.78 on weekdays — 15% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.01 to 0.47 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 52% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

13
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-05-19)
11
at the previous standard inspection (2024-05-21)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

35 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 25 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-16 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure fall interventions were in place according to the plan of care for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for accidents. (Resident 28)Findings include:1. During an observation, on 6/9/26 at 10:54 a.m., Resident 28 was sitting up in bed, and the head of the bed was elevated. A mattress was observed propped up between the wall, by the door and a recliner. During an interview, on 6/9/26 at 11:32 a.m., Resident 28 indicated he had fallen out of his bed. During an interview, on 6/9/26 at 11:38 a.m., LPN 1 indicated he was not sure if the fall mat needed to be on the floor when Resident 28 was in bed. The care plan was reviewed, and LPN 1 indicated the fall mat was to be on the floor when the resident was in bed.2. During an observation, on 6/11/26 at 10:04 a.m., Resident 28 was in a high back wheelchair in his room. A call light pad was observed on the sofa directly behind the resident. The resident attempted to reach the call light and indicated he could not find it. During an interview, on 6/11/26 at 10:21 a.m., the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-10 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) were in place and followed for 3 of 5 residents reviewed for pressure ulcers (Residents H, F and G).Findings include:During a facility tour, on 9/9/25, with the Director of Health Services (DHS) and the Assistant Director of Health Services (ADHS), the following residents did not have Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) in place and followed.1. Resident H had a dressing around his right great toe. The ADHS indicated the resident had a pressure ulcer to his right great toe. There were no Enhanced Barrier Precautions in place. When the DHS raised the resident's right foot to make it easier to see the dressing on his toe, she did not put on a gown prior to touching the resident's foot.The clinical record for Resident H was reviewed on 9/10/25 at 3:15 p.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, type II diabetes mellitus, dementia, pulmonary fibrosis, major depressive disorder, and cognitive communitive disorder.A physician's order, dated 9/4/25, indicated Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2025-05-19 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — widespread
    Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure sufficient qualified nursing staff were available to provide nursing and related services to the residents and a licensed staff member was available on-call to cover the staffing needs of the facility. This deficient practice had the potential to affect 92 of 92 residents who resided in the facility. Findings include: 1. A [NAME] Payroll Based Journal (PBJ) for the first quarter of 2025 indicated the facility had a 1-star staffing rating. 2. A nursing progress note, dated 4/19/25 at 2:30 a.m., indicated Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) 12 heard an alarm sounding. A resident was at the end of the 200-hallway. LPN 12 ran to the end of the hallway. The resident opened the door and stepped outside. While trying to bring the resident back inside, the resident hit LPN 12 in the head with a glass vase full of water and flowers. The resident was brought back inside the facility. The Director of Nursing (DON), Executive Director (ED), Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) was notified. LPN 12 was given an order from the ED to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-19 · tag F0552 — isolated
    Ensure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure an informed consent for antipsychotic medication use was obtained for 1 of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medication. (Resident 34) Findings include: The clinical record for Resident 34 was reviewed on 5/14/25 at 8:48 a.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, dementia with psychotic disturbance, anxiety, and depression. A physician's order, with a start date of 4/15/25, indicated Resident 34 was to take risperidone (an antipsychotic medication) 0.5 milligrams twice a day. A care plan, dated 4/16/25, indicated Resident 34 was at risk for adverse consequences related to receiving an antipsychotic medication. There was no documentation found in Resident 34's electronic health record to indicate the resident or the resident's representative was informed of the risks and benefits of the antipsychotic medication, treatment alternatives, and the option to choose the preferred treatment. During an interview, on 5/15/25 at 5:20 p.m., Resident 34's daughter indicated Resident 34 was admitted to an area…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-19 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident's preference of having female caregivers was documented and followed for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for accommodation of needs. (Resident 25) Findings include: During an interview, on 5/12/25 at 1:55 p.m., Resident 25 indicated she preferred females to complete catheter care on her and there were males who would complete her catheter care. During an interview, on 5/13/25 at 1:50 p.m., Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) 8 indicated the staff knew Resident 25 did not like male staff members to complete peri-care or catheter care for her. It was known, females should be completing the catheter and peri-care for Resident 25 and not male staff members. The clinical record for Resident 25 was reviewed on 5/13/25 at 1:44 p.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, Parkinson's disease and heart failure. A physician's order, dated 12/21/21, indicated to complete catheter care every shift, three (3) times per day. A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 3/12/25, indicated Resident 25 was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-19 · tag F0628 — isolated
    Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure there was documentation the bed hold policy was provided to a resident for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for bed hold policy. (Resident 6) Findings include: The clinical record for Resident 6 was reviewed on 5/12/25 at 10:52 a.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, falls, chronic pain, and low back pain. A nursing progress note, dated 12/3/24, indicated the resident had sustained a fracture to the tail bone and was transported to the hospital. A copy of the bed hold policy was not located in the resident's clinical record. During an interview, on 5/19/25 at 1:45 p.m., the Corporate Minimum Data Set (MDS) nurse indicated a bed hold policy was not provided. A current facility policy, titled Bed Hold Notification, dated as last reviewed 1/8/25 and received from the Corporate MDS nurse on 5/19/25 at 1:59 p.m., indicated .Residents and Responsible Parties have a right to be notified verbally and in writing on reserve bed payment policy per the state plan when someone goes out to the hospital .Before a nursing…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-19 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment was coded correctly for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for MDS assessments. (Resident C) Findings include: During an observation, on 5/12/25 at 12:16 p.m., Resident C was receiving oxygen from a portable oxygen tank. During an observation, on 5/13/25 at 9:43 a.m., Resident C was receiving oxygen from a portable oxygen tank. During an observation, on 5/13/24 at 1:54 p.m., Resident C was receiving oxygen. During an observation, on 5/14/25 at 9:19 a.m., Resident C was receiving oxygen from a portable oxygen tank. The clinical record for Resident C was reviewed on 5/14/25 at 10:45 a.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, saddle embolus of the pulmonary artery with cor pulmonale (a clot at the bifurcation of the pulmonary artery which obstructed blood flow), pulmonary fibrosis, and atelectasis (part or full collapse of the lung). Resident C's care plan, dated 11/5/24, indicated to administer oxygen per the physician's order. A physician's order, dated 11/19/24,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-19 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure documentation showed as needed (PRN) medications were administered under the direction of a licensed nurse for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for pain. (Resident 26) Findings include: The clinical record for Resident 26 was reviewed on 5/14/25 at 1:49 p.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, type 2 diabetes mellitus with diabetic neuropathy, spondylosis of the lumbar region, and pain. A current care plan, dated 10/19/23, indicated Resident 26 was at risk for pain and to administer medications as ordered. 1. A physician's order, dated 7/20/24, indicated to give acetaminophen 650 milligrams (mg) for mild to moderate pain every 6 hours as needed. The Medication Administration Record (MAR) dated 5/1/25-5/16/25, indicated acetaminophen was given as needed for pain by a QMA without record of an assessment or permission from a licensed nurse on 5/2/25 and 5/8/25. 2. A physician's order, dated 7/11/24, indicated to give Norco (a narcotic pain medication) 7.5 mg- 325 mg for moderate to severe pain every 6 hours as…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-19 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff obtained and documented a resident's vital signs prior to administering a medication with physician's ordered hold parameters for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for quality of care. (Resident 22) Findings include: The clinical record for Resident 22 was reviewed on 5/15/25 at 11:07 a.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, type 2 diabetes mellitus with diabetic polyneuropathy and hypoglycemia, hypertension, cognitive communication deficit, edema, and bradycardia. A physician's order, dated 4/18/25, indicated to give metoprolol succinate (a medication which lowers blood pressure and heart rate) 25 milligrams once a day with special instructions to hold the medication for a heart rate of less than 55 or a systolic blood pressure less than 110. A physician's order, dated 4/18/25, indicated to obtain a blood pressure and heart rate reading twice a day for 7 days. A Medication Administration Record (MAR), dated April 2025, indicated Resident 22's vital signs were…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-19 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident was transferred according to the plan of care to prevent a fall and a post fall parameter mattress intervention was in place for 2 of 8 residents reviewed for accidents. (Resident 2 and 6) Findings include: 1. The clinical record for Resident 2 was reviewed on 5/14/25 at 1:53 p.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, age related osteoporosis, history of falling, and unspecified glaucoma. A physician's order, dated 6/4/24, indicated to use the sit-to-stand lift to transfer Resident 2 in and out of bed only per Resident 2's request and therapy approval. A current care plan, dated 10/10/24, indicated staff should use the sit-to-stand lift to transfer Resident 2 in and out of bed. A nursing progress note, dated 4/28/25 at 6:24 p.m., indicated an aide was assisting the resident into bed when the resident started to lose strength and balance. The resident was then assisted to the floor without further incident. No injury was noted. Additional staff were able to assist Resident 2 off the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 25 citations
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-19 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure catheter urine output was accurately recorded as ordered for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for urinary catheters. (Resident 26) Findings include: The clinical record for Resident 26 was reviewed on 5/14/25 at 1:49 p.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, sepsis, infection and inflammatory reaction due to indwelling urethral catheter, bacteremia, hematuria, obstructive and reflux uropathy, and retention of urine. A physician's order, dated 11/11/24, indicated to place an indwelling urinary catheter for obstructive and reflux uropathy. A physician's order, dated 1/26/24, indicated to monitor the catheter output three times a day. A physician's order, dated 7/31/24, indicated give 20 milligrams of Lasix (a diuretic medication) twice a day for edema (swelling). A facility document, dated 5/1/25 through 5/15/25, indicated the following: On 5/2/25 at 3:19 a.m., large was recorded. On 5/2/25 at 9:13 a.m., large was recorded. On 5/3/25 12:28 p.m., medium was recorded. On 5/3/25 10:22 p.m., large was recorded. On…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-19 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure physician's orders were obtained and followed for 2 of 2 residents reviewed for oxygen administration. (Resident C and 109) Findings include: 1. During an observation, on 5/12/25 at 12:16 p.m., Resident C was observed in the dining room with a portable oxygen tank set to administer two (2) liters per minute of oxygen via nasal cannula. During an observation, on 5/13/25 at 9:43 a.m., Resident C was in an activity with a portable oxygen tank set to administer two (2) liters per minute of oxygen via nasal cannula. During an interview, on 5/13/25 at 9:53 a.m., the Director of Nursing (DON) reviewed Resident C's physician's orders. She indicated Resident C was to receive four (4) liters per minute of oxygen and Resident C's tank was set at two (2) liters. During an observation, on 5/13/24 at 1:54 p.m., Resident C's oxygen was set at four (4) liters per nasal cannula. The clinical record for Resident C was reviewed on 5/14/25 at 10:45 a.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, saddle embolus of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-19 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure Abnormal Involuntary Movement Scale (AIMS) assessments were completed for evaluation of adverse reactions related to antipsychotic medications for 1 of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. (Resident 19) Findings include: The clinical record for Resident 19 was reviewed on 5/14/25 at 11:10 a.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, psychosis not due to a substance or known physiological condition, dementia with psychotic disturbance, psychotic disorder with hallucinations due to a known physiological condition, delirium due to known physiological condition, major depressive disorder, anxiety disorder, auditory hallucinations, and visual hallucinations. A physician's order, dated 8/12/24, indicated to give olanzapine (an antipsychotic medication) 5 milligrams at bedtime. A psychiatry progress note, dated 9/23/24, indicated the resident was taking olanzapine and the last AIMS assessment was completed on 6/21/23. A care plan, dated 11/1/24, indicated Resident 19 was at risk for adverse…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-19 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure medications were labeled with pharmacy labels and the date the medications were opened in 2 of 2 medication carts reviewed for medication storage. (100 hall and 200 hall) Findings include: 1. The medication cart, on the 100-hall, was reviewed on 5/15/25 at 10:11 a.m. The following was observed: a. The first drawer contained an open bottle of Carbamide Peroxide 6.5% (ear drops). The medication was not labeled with the date it had been opened. b. The second drawer contained an open bottle of liquid Haloperidol (an antipsychotic medication). The bottle was half empty and was not labeled with the date the medication had been opened. During an interview, on 5/15/25 at 10:20 a.m., LPN 2 indicated the medications should have been labeled with the date they were opened. 2. The medication cart, on the 200-hall, was reviewed on 5/15/25 at 10:55 a.m. The following was observed in the top drawer: a. Spiriva (an inhalation spray), with a sticker, indicating the medication should be discarded 90 days after being…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-19 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff wore personal protective equipment (PPE) correctly, performed hand hygiene, and changed gloves for 2 of 2 randomly observed staff members reviewed for infection control. (QMA 10 and RN 7) Findings include: During an observation, on 5/15/25 at 1:17 p.m., RN 7 and QMA 10 tied PPE gowns at the back of their neck, neither staff member tied the gowns closed at their waist and entered Resident C's room. 1. QMA 10 with gloves on, cleaned Resident C's mouth with a toothette (an oral swab) and discard it. QMA 10 then moved the mechanical lift into place. She picked up the resident's catheter drainage system with her left gloved hand and attached the bag to the mechanical lift strap. She ensured the sling was properly connected to the mechanical lift and used the control to lift the resident. The resident was then lowered to the bed. QMA 10 removed the resident's hearing aids and put them onto the charger. She assisted the resident to turn onto her left side. QMA 10 was then observed to handle the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-22 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure an elopement of a resident was reported to the Indiana Department of Health for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for elopement (Resident B). Finding includes: During an observation on 08/20/24 at 8:58 a.m., Resident B was in her room dressed, clean and dry and wearing a wander guard bracelet on her wrist. She was alert, able to sit up on the side of the bed without assistance and very friendly. She currently resided in the Legacy Memory Care Unit of the Assisted Living Facility. Her wheel chair was noted to be parked in close proximity to her bed and within reach. During an interview on 08/21/24 at 10:29 a.m., the Corporate Support Nurse indicated on 07/18/24, Resident B exited the campus out the 300 hall door. The alarm did sound and a family member observed the resident exit and reported it to staff immediately. The staff responded. The resident used the side walk to the Health Care Center parking lot and crossed the street. She was observed by the home owner, across the street, who was out in the yard.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-22 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to timely investigate an elopement when the incident occurred for 1 of 1 resident, reviewed for eloping from the facility (Resident B). Finding includes: During an interview on 08/21/24 at 10:29 a.m., the Corporate Support Nurse indicated on 07/18/24, Resident B exited the campus out the 300 hall door. The alarm did sound and a family member observed the resident exit and reported it to staff immediately. The staff responded. The resident used the side walk to the Health Care Center parking lot and crossed the street. She was observed by the home owner, across the street, who was out in the yard. Responding staff did get to the resident. It took about three (3) minutes. The resident had been last observed by a nurse at 8:22 p.m. The nurse then had to go print reports, due to the internet outage. The responding staff returned Resident B to the facility at 8:33 p.m. Staff did all the right things (followed the elopement policy) and it was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-05-21 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — pattern
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to personalize resident care plans for advanced directives for 5 of 5 residents reviewed for advance directive care plans (Resident 11, 19, 32, 35, and 40). Findings include: 1. On [DATE] at 12:52 p.m., a record review was completed for Resident 11. She had the following diagnoses which included, but not limited to urinary tract infection, chest pain, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), atrial fibrillation (A-Fib), hyperlipidemia, and dementia. Resident 11 had a care plan indicating she had chosen to have the following advanced directive, but failed to indicate whether she was to have CPR (cardiopulmonary resuscitation) or DNR (do not resuscitate). She had an order, dated [DATE], for a DNR. 2. On [DATE] at 2:46 p.m., a record review was completed for Resident 19. He had the following diagnoses which included but were not limited to COPD, type II diabetes mellitus, morbid obesity, chest pain, heart failure, and major depression with psychotic…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-05-21 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — pattern
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to properly dispose of medications belonging to residents for 1 of 6 resident reviewed for medication disposition (Resident 204, 205 and 50). Findings include: 1. On [DATE] at 11:36 a.m., a record review was completed for Resident 204. He has the following diagnoses which included but were not limited to hypertension, hyperlipidemia, hypothyroidism, insomnia, and pain. He was discharged from the facility on [DATE]. He had the following medications unaccounted for after being discharged from the facility. a.) Amlodipine 5 milligrams (mg) b.) Aspirin 81 mg c.) Atorvastatin 80 mg d.) Cholecalciferol 1,250 micrograms (mcg) (50,000 unit) e.) Ipratropium-albuterol 0.5 mg - 3 mg (2.5mg/3ml) f.) Levothyroxine 112 mcg g.) Melatonin 5 mg h.) Ondansetron 4 mg i.) Tylenol 325 mg 2. On [DATE] at 11:47 a.m., a record review was completed for Resident 205. She had the following diagnoses which included but were not limited to hypertension, heart failure, diabetes…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-05-21 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to date and/or label insulin pens, eye drops, and inhalers when opened, and remove expired insulin pens and lorazepam from the cart when expired for 2 of 3 medication carts and 1 of 1 medication storage room reviewed for medication storage. Findings include: 1. The following medications were in the 100-hall medication cart: a. Resident 14 had a bottle of lorazepam 2mg/ml in the refrigerator. It expired on [DATE]. b. Resident 29 had basaglar insulin dated [DATE]. It was expired. c. Resident 33 had basaglar insulin with no date to indicate when it was opened. She also had lantus insulin with a date opened of [DATE]. It was expired. She had a bottle of refresh eye drops in the cart. The drops lacked a label. d. Resident 5 had an albuterol inhaler HFA 90mcg per actuation. It lacked a date to indicate when it was opened. She had an inhaler trelegy ellipta 100mcg/62.5mcg/25mcg in the cart. It lacked a date to indicate when it was opened. e. Resident 42 had an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-05-21 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure hand hygiene was completed between residents during meal service for 1 of 1 observation of dining (Residents 26, 18, and1) Findings include: On 5/14/24 at 11:43 a.m., 37 residents were observed during a lunch service. Dietary Aide (DA) 12 was observed to serve milk to Resident 26, then moved his wheelchair into a better position in front of the lunch table. He was observed to hold the handles of his wheelchair with his bare hands. DA 12 did not use hand washing and hand sanitizer before providing a drink to Resident 18. After a short conversation with Resident 18, he went to a cabinet, used his bare hand to open it and retrieved a clothing protector and placed it on the resident. DA 12 did not do any hand hygiene and provided a drink for an unidentified resident. DA 12's bare hands were observed on the Resident's 1 wheelchair handles as he brought her into the lunch room. He did not do any hand hygiene, then went to a cabinet area and opened a drawer with his bare hand. He removed a plate and retrieved a Styrofoam cup…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-05-21 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — pattern
    Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the infection control program objectives were followed regarding the influenza vaccinations for residents in a timely manner for 5 of 22 residents reviewed for 2023/2024 flu season (Resident 8, 22, 23, 38, and 46). This deficiency was corrected on 4/26/24 prior to the start of the survey and was therefore Past noncompliance. Finding include: On 5/16/23 at 12:04 p.m., Resident 46's immunizations were reviewed. The last flu vaccination for her was provided on 1/27/23. On 5/16/24 at 3:30 p.m., the Regional Clinical Support (RCS) indicated the facility did not offer Resident 46 a flu vaccination for the 2023/24 flu season. She indicated when the Director of Health Services (DHS) started at the facility in 2/12/24, she updated everyone with tuberculous (TB) screenings, and was working on updates for flu vaccinations. On 5/16/24 at 11:20 a.m., the Infection Preventionist (IP) indicated flu shots were mandatory at this facility. Resident should have…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Potential for harm · D2024-05-21 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident, (Resident E) was treated with respect and dignity during a transfer observation, and failed to ensure a resident, (Resident B) was treated with respect and dignity during a treatment observation for 2 of 3 residents reviewed for dignity. Findings include: 1. On 5/17/24 at 11:25 a.m., the following was observed: Certified Nursing Aides (CNA) 14 and 15 entered Resident E's room to lay her roommate down. Resident E was observed sitting up in bed as she attempted to get out of bed. She was observed to have had an incontinent episode and stool was noted as it seeped from the edges of her brief. Resident E complained that her bottom was burning and itching very bad and she continued to attempt to get out of bed. CNA 14 indicated they would get Resident E cleaned up first since her roommate was comfortably asleep in her Broda chair. CNA 14 looked in the resident's closet, but indicated there were no pants so she left the room to go get Resident E a new pair of pants. After CNA 14 left, CNA 15…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-05-21 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure Activities of Daily Living (ADL) preferences were honored and implemented for a totally dependent resident for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for ADLs, (Resident B). Findings include: During a continuous observation and interview on 5/15/24 from 2:00 p.m., until 2:22 p.m., Resident B was observed in bed. She was lying flat on her back in her bed. She wore a hospital gown, and her hair was matted and tangled. Thick build up of eye drainage was observed caked in her eye lashes, and there were flakes of dandruff in her hair. A napkin from lunch remained on her chest, where bits of food crumbs had fallen, and there was food crust/stains around her mouth. Resident B indicated, no one had helped her get cleaned up after lunch. During a confidential interview during the survey, it was indicated that several complaints had been made and were ongoing related to Resident B's care. She went days or weeks without getting her teeth brushed, her hair was not washed with her special shampoo, and she was often left in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-05-21 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolated
    Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a person-centered and meaningful activity program was implemented for a resident (Resident B) to maintain and/or enhance her quality of life for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for activities. Findings include: During a continuous observation and interview on 5/15/24 from 2:00 p.m., until 2:22 p.m., Resident B was observed in bed. The lights were off, there were personal items stacked in front of her TV which was off. Resident B was alert and oriented and engaged in conversation. Resident B indicated she did not get invited to activities, and any activity she wanted to try, staff did not have her up and ready in time. She required a Hoyer lift for transfers which was painful, especially when staff often rushed through the task and did not take their time to help make sure she was comfortable, it was too much trouble. During the interview, activity staff was heard in the hallway inviting other residents to activities. Resident B asked who…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-21 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to prevent the potential for accidents during a resident's transfer, ensuring the implementation of routine monitoring for an electronic wheelchair seatbelt and by ensuring a new mattress was appropriately measured and fitted to the bed frame for 3 of 3 residents reviewed for accidents (Residents E, 8 and C). Findings include: 1. On 5/17/24 at 11:25 a.m., the following was observed. Certified Nursing Aides (CNA) 14 and 15 entered Resident E's room to lay her roommate down. Resident E was observed sitting up in bed as she attempted to get out of bed. She was observed to have had an incontinent episode and stool was noted as it seeped from the edges of her brief. Resident E complained that her bottom was burning and itching very bad and she continued to attempt to get out of bed. CNA 14 indicated they would get Resident E cleaned up first since her roommate was comfortable asleep in her broad chair. CNA 14 looked in the resident's closet, but indicated there were no pants so she left the room to go get Resident E…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-21 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure respiratory equipment was stored according to the facility policy for 1 of 1 residents reviewed for respiratory equipment (Resident 44). Findings include: On 5/14/24 at 1:48 p.m., Resident 44's continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) facial equipment was observed uncovered on the resident's bedside table. On 5/17/24 at 11:14 a.m., Resident 44's CPAP facial equipment was observed uncovered on the resident's bedside table. On 5/17/24 at 2:09 p.m., Resident 44's record was reviewed. He was admitted on [DATE]. His diagnoses included, but were not limited to, obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) (difficulty breathing while sleeping), dementia (progressive loss of intellectual functioning), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) (lung disease including constriction of the airways), hypotension (low blood pressure), altered mental status (AMS), asthma (chronic disease of bronchial airways causing difficulty breathing). Physician orders…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-21 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to indicate the rationale for the use of medications for residents reviewed for medication use for 2 of 2 residents (Resident 33 and 19). Findings include: 1. On 5/15/24 at 2:55 p.m., a record review was completed for Resident 33. She had the following diagnoses which included but were not limited to type 2 diabetes mellitus, depression, major depression, and heart disease. She had the following medication orders that lacked an indication for use. a. Atorvastin (medication typically used for hyperlipidemia) 80 milligrams (mg) at bedtime for an indication of use of not applicable (N/A). b. Basaglar kwikpen U-100 insulin (medication typically used for diabetes mellitus) 20 units at bedtime. The medication order lacked an indication for use. c. Clonidine (medication typically used for hypertension and heart failure) 0.2 mg give with 0.3 mg to equal 0.5 mg daily with an indication for use of N/A. d. Ferrous sulfate (medication typically used for anemia) 325 mg two times daily for an indication of use of N/A. e. Levothyroxine…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-03-07 · tag F0552 — isolated
    Ensure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents who received high risk antipsychotic medication had the risks and benefits reviewed with them and/or their representatives for 2 of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. (Resident 40 and 29) Findings include: 1. The record for Resident 40 was reviewed on 03/02/23 at 4:02 p.m. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, unspecified dementia without behavioral disturbance, psychotic disturbance, mood disturbance, and anxiety. A physician's order, initiated on 01/27/23, indicated to give Seroquel (an antipsychotic) 25 mg times two tablets every bedtime for Alzheimer's delusions. This order was a dosage change. A care plan, initiated on 07/28/22, indicated Resident 40 was at risk for adverse consequences related to the use of an antipsychotic medication. A facility document, titled Observation Detail List Report, with a completed date of 06/09/22 and provided by the Corporate Support Nurse on 03/07/23 at 1:32 p.m., indicated the resident was using an antipsychotic medication. The name of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-03-07 · tag F0554 — isolated
    Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the IDT (Interdisciplinary Team) determined which medications may be self-administered and failed to ensure a physician's order to use and keep medications at the bedside was obtained for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for self-administration. (Resident 20) Finding includes: During an observation, on 03/07/23 at 8:46 a.m., Resident 20 had on his bedside table a bottle of dorzol/timol solution (eye drops) 2 percent, a bottle of dorzolamide (eye drops) 2 percent, a bottle of brimonidine solution (eye drops) 0.2 percent and a bottle of ipratropium (a nasal spray) spray 0.6 percent. Resident 20 indicated he administered the medications himself and then nursing picks them up. The record for Resident 20 was reviewed on 03/07/23 at 1:43 p.m. Diagnosis included, but were not limited to, age related debility, syncope and collapse, and acute respiratory distress. There was no self-administer of medication assessment in the record at the time of the review. There were no orders to self-administer any medications in the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-03-07 · tag F0659 — isolated
    Provide care by qualified persons according to each resident's written plan of care.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a licensed staff member assessed a resident prior to an as needed medication (PRN) was administered by a QMA for 1 of 1 randomly observed resident receiving a PRN medication. (Resident 31) Finding includes: During an observation, on 03/03/23 at 3:33 p.m., the spouse of Resident 31 approached QMA 7 and asked if Resident 31 was given his Mucinex (a medication for cough and congestion). She indicated he was congested. The QMA removed the Mucinex and prepped the medication for administration. The QMA then briefly spoke with LPN 5 in the hall, and then went into the room. The QMA was observed to administer the medication to the resident. The nurse was not observed to assess the resident prior to the administration of the medication. The record for Resident 31 was reviewed on 03/07/23 at 10:27 a.m. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, hypertensive heart disease with heart failure (heart problems which occur because of high blood pressure), chronic congestive heart failure (the heart has trouble…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-03-07 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure fall interventions were being followed to prevent further falls for 3 of 3 residents reviewed for accidents. (Resident 39, 16, and 30) Findings include: 1. During an interview, on 03/02/2023 at 1:28 p.m., a concerned family member of Resident 39 indicated she had received a call from the facility approximately 3 weeks prior to inform her the resident had fallen while being transferred in the bathroom. She was concerned a gait belt was not used at the time of the transfer. Resident 39 had a stroke and required a gait belt during transfers. The record for Resident 39 was reviewed on 03/02/2023 at 3:40 p.m. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, history of significant fracture of the shaft of the right fibula, history of falls, hemiplegia and hemiparesis following a cerebral infarction (stroke) affecting the right dominant side, hypertension, anxiety disorder, tremors, and generalized muscle weakness. A progress noted, dated 10/29/22 at 12:46 p.m., indicated the resident was assisted to the floor by…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-03-07 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure medication orders contained the appropriate indication for the administration of the medications for 1 of 5 residents reviewed for medications. (Resident 40) Finding includes: The record for Resident 40 was reviewed on 03/02/23 at 4:02 p.m. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, unspecified dementia without behavioral disturbance, psychotic disturbance, mood disturbance, and anxiety. A physician's order, initiated on 05/23/22, indicated to give finasteride (a medication for an enlarged prostate) 5 milligrams (mg) once a day. The indication for use was Alzheimer's disease, contact with and (suspected) exposure to COVID-19, dementia with behavioral disturbance, and vomiting. A physician's order, initiated on 05/23/22, indicated to give folic acid (vitamin B-9) 1 mg once a day. The indication for use was Alzheimer's disease, contact with and (suspected) exposure to COVID-19, dementia with behavioral disturbance, and vomiting. A physician's order, initiated on 05/23/22, indicated to give a multivitamin tablet once…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-03-07 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide appropriate diagnosis for use of psychotropic medications (antipsychotic medication) for 2 of 5 residents reviewed for psychotropic medications. (Resident 29 and 40) Findings include: 1. The record for Resident 29 was reviewed. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, unspecified dementia with other behavioral disturbance. During an interview, on 03/03/23 at 8:48 a.m., Resident 29's family member indicated Resident 29 was aggressive in the hospital. He was having delusions in the hospital, thinking he was in other places. A physician's order, with a start date of 2/23/23, indicated to give Risperidone (an antipsychotic medication). There was no documented diagnosis. The physician's order indicated a Safety Alert which indicated a Drug-to-Condition Interaction Alert for Risperidone .should be used with extreme caution when senile dementia, a condition related to .Unspecified dementia, unspecified severity, with other behavioral disturbance exists. A review of the Prescription Fax Request for Resident 29,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-03-07 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — isolated
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to remove a used brief from a room which caused the room to smell of urine (Resident 45), failed to ensure floors were not sticky (room [ROOM NUMBER]), failed to removed soiled linen and trash from a room (Resident 207), failed to ensure soiled linen was not left on furniture (Resident 207) and failed to make repairs to dry wall (Rooms 103, 111 and 112) observed for environment. Findings include: 1. During an observation, on 03/01/23 at 10:31 a.m., Resident 45 was sitting up in his room. The room smelled of urine. A used brief was observed in the trash can. During an interview, on 03/01/23 at 10:47 a.m., RN 2 indicated the brief should have been removed. 2. During an observation, on 03/01/23 at 11:26 a.m., the floor of room [ROOM NUMBER] was found to be very sticky throughout the room as evidenced by shoes sticking to the floor with every step. 3. During an observation, on 03/01/23 at 11:44 a.m., Resident 207's bed was observed to be stripped…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to TRILOGY HEALTH SERVICES — 123 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 2 of 54.2-2.2 vs chain
Health inspection 2 of 53.5-1.5 vs chain
Staffing 2 of 53.3-1.3 vs chain
Quality measures 4 of 54.8-0.8 vs chain
The other 122 homes this chain runs (chain average 4.2★, per CMS)
1 of 5Heritage TheFindlay, OH 1 of 5The Oaks Rehabilitation and Healthcare CenterZanesville, OH 2 of 5Violet Springs Health CampusPickerington, OH 2 of 5Woodmont Health CampusBoonville, IN 3 of 5Cobblestone Crossings Health CampusTerre Haute, IN 3 of 5Creasy Springs Health CampusLafayette, IN 3 of 5Cumberland Pointe Health CampusWest Lafayette, IN 3 of 5Forest Park Health CampusRichmond, IN 3 of 5Franciscan Health Care CenterLouisville, KY 3 of 5Greenleaf Health CampusElkhart, IN 3 of 5River Terrace Health CampusMadison, IN 3 of 5Scenic Hills At The MonasteryFerdinand, IN 3 of 5Smiths Mill Health CampusNew Albany, OH 3 of 5Springhurst Health CampusGreenfield, IN 3 of 5Springs Of Richmond, TheRichmond, IN 3 of 5St Mary Healthcare CenterLafayette, IN 3 of 5Stonegate Health CampusLapeer, MI 3 of 5Sun Prairie Senior LivingSun Prairie, WI 3 of 5Taylor Springs Health CampusGahanna, OH 3 of 5The Willows at Fritz FarmLexington, KY 3 of 5The Willows at HamburgLexington, KY 3 of 5The Willows at HarrodsburgHarrodsburg, KY 3 of 5The Willows at SpringhurstLouisville, KY 3 of 5Villages At Oak Ridge, TheWashington, IN 3 of 5Waunakee Valley Senior LivingWaunakee, WI 3 of 5Wellbrooke Of CarmelCarmel, IN 4 of 5Arlington Place Health CampusIndianapolis, IN 4 of 5Ashford Place Health CampusShelbyville, IN 4 of 5Aspen Place Health CampusGreensburg, IN 4 of 5Avalon Springs Health CampusValparaiso, IN 4 of 5Bethany Pointe Health CampusAnderson, IN 4 of 5Blair Ridge Health CampusPeru, IN 4 of 5Bridgepointe Health CampusVincennes, IN 4 of 5Cedar Creek Health CampusLowell, IN 4 of 5Clearvista Lake Health CampusIndianapolis, IN 4 of 5Forest Springs Health CampusLouisville, KY 4 of 5Glen Oaks Health CampusNew Castle, IN 4 of 5Glen Ridge Health CampusLouisville, KY 4 of 5Meadows Of Delphos TheDelphos, OH 4 of 5Meadows Of Ottawa TheOttawa, OH

Showing 40 of 122; lowest-rated first.

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
WITHAM MEMORIAL HOSPITALOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST100%since 05/01/2015
TRILOGY HEALTHCARE OF LEBANON, LLCOrganizationINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 05/01/2015
TRILOGY OPCO LLCOrganizationINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 12/01/2015
TRILOGY PRO SERVICES LLCOrganizationINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 12/01/2015
KEYBANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATIONOrganization5% OR GREATER MORTGAGE INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFsince 07/11/2025
BAYSTON, BRETTIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 01/01/2023
BRAND, JOHNIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 01/01/2015
CASTETTER, ANDREAIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 01/01/2023
HAWKINS, CLAUDEIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 09/09/2013
HORNBECKER, MICHAELIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 01/01/2024
REAGAN, JULIEIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 09/25/2024
BRAVERMAN, KELLYIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 12/01/2021
SELLERS, DANIELIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 06/20/2024
SHAH, AMISHAIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 07/10/2025
BARNEY, LEIGHIndividualINDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNFsince 09/22/2025
DAVIS, DAVIDIndividualINDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNFsince 09/22/2025
AMERICAN HEALTHCARE REIT HOLDINGS LPOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 12/01/2015
AMERICAN HEALTHCARE REIT INCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 10/01/2018
CONTINENTAL MERGER SUB LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 10/01/2021
GAHC3 TRILOGY JV LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 12/01/2015
GAHC4 TRILOGY JV LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 10/01/2018
PARAGON OUTPATIENT REHABILITATION SERVICES LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 12/01/2015
TRILOGY HEALTH SERVICES LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 10/09/2000
TRILOGY HEALTHCARE MASTER TENANT II, LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 07/10/2025
TRILOGY INVESTORS LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 12/01/2015
TRILOGY MANAGEMENT SERVICES LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 07/10/2025
TRILOGY PROPCO FINANCE LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 10/09/2000
TRILOGY PROPERTY HOLDINGS LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 10/09/2000
TRILOGY REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUSTOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 12/01/2015
TRILOGY REAL ESTATE OF LEBANON, LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 10/09/2000
TRILOGY REIT HOLDINGS LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 12/01/2015
PARACHA, IBRARIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 07/10/2025

CMS files one row per role, so the 35 rows in the source record cover these 32 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

20 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$9.2M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
+8.8%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$868K
Related-party expense10% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 36%Medicare 6%Other / private 58%

This home reported $868K paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 10% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$280per resident / day
operating cost
$8,527per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$308per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in IN

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Indiana Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Indiana
$8,943/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$10,326/mo
Nursing home (private)
$5,639/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 155680. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-05-19, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next