No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Franciscan Health Care Center

3625 Fern Valley Road, Louisville, KY 40219 · For profit - Corporation · 87 certified beds · (502) 964-3381 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (502) 964-3381 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse-prevention, restraint, or reporting citation — no harm found (F0609) — cited Dec 2025
Insights

The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.

In its favor
  • no harm-level citations in the current inspection record
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
Worth asking about
  • it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
  • about 17% of its spending goes to commonly-owned related companies
  • CMS ownership filings flag it as owned by a private-equity firm or REIT — a category that performs worse on staffing on average, though that average says nothing certain about this home, and CMS filings undercount these ties, so other homes here may have them unflagged (what the research actually shows →)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

3/5
CMS overall
3 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 2 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 3 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 5 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★★ 4/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
3607 Fern Valley Rd · (502) 459-4900 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
Walgreens<0.1 mi
3600 Fern Valley Rd · (502) 964-7114 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
6201 Preston Hwy · (502) 498-5088 · Call to confirm hours
Park
1112 Clay Ave · (502) 574-7275 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 5 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 4 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 5 to 3 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating3★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased8.8%13.8%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight6.2%6.6%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder2.4%0.5%0.9%worse
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.0%1.6%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms5.6%17.7%6.5%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.2%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury0.6%3.9%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened4.8%14.0%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication20.1%29.8%18.9%typical
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%96.2%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers2.4%4.8%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control18.2%19.0%21.2%better
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table4.2%16.1%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.6%1.7%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine86.6%83.5%79.4%typical
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission28.0%24.2%22.6%worse
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit9.2%13.7%12.0%better
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days1.691.941.67typical
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days0.762.141.80better

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

68.0% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 427 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

68.0%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
11.2%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
57.5%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.65U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.29hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.30hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.06hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 57.5% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 214 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.65 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 90% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 10% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF68.0%CMS range 62.8–70.851.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024better than U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF11.2%CMS range 8.9–13.610.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge57.5%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge66.8%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge40.2%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting100.0%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.4%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened1.5%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization6.3%CMS range 4.1–9.27.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.961.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.90
RN hours/ resident / day
1.16
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.14
Aide hours/ resident / day
4.20
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.99
RN hoursweekends
43.6%
Total nursing turnover
53.3%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 87 beds and averages 76.1 residents a day — about 87% occupied, or roughly 11 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.20 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.90 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.14 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.88 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.32 on weekdays — 10% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.87 to 0.99 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 44% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

9
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-12-10)
1
at the previous standard inspection (2022-07-14)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

13 citations, most serious first — scroll within the box to see all.

  • Potential for harm · E2025-12-10 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — pattern
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, record review, and review of facility documentation, the facility failed to ensure necessary care and services (i.e. nail care) were provided for residents unable to carry out their own activities of daily living (ADLs) for 3 of 35 sampled residents, (Resident (R)81, 91, and 100). The findings include:During interview on 09/20/2025 at 1:44 PM, the Division [NAME] President (DVP) stated the facility did not have a policy related to trimming or cleaning residents' nails. The DVP stated the Certified Resident Care Associate's (CRCA) checklist noted the CRCAs were responsible for grooming, which included trimming/cleaning residents' nails who did not have a diagnosis of diabetes.Review of the facility document titled, Job Descriptions, for a Certified Resident Care Associate, revealed staff were to, Assist residents with nail care (i.e., clipping, trimming, and cleaning the finger/toenails. (NOTE: Does not include diabetic residents).1. Record review revealed the Resident Face Sheet noted the facility admitted R!00 on 09/11/2025, with diagnoses that…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-12-10 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — pattern
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, record review, facility document and policy review, the facility failed to ensure a medication error rate of less than 5 percent (%) or less, with 6 errors out of 30 opportunities, which yielded a medication error rate of 20% involving 4 of 4 residents observed for medication administration out of the total sample of 35 (Residents (R)21, 2, 13, and 15). The findings include:Review of the facility policy titled, Medication Administration-General Guidelines, revised 11/2018, revealed the FIVE RIGHTS for medication administration included the right resident, right drug, right dose, right route, and right time, and those rights were to be applied for each medication being administered. Per review, a triple check of the Five Rights was recommended at three steps in the process of preparation of a medication for administration. Continued review revealed the three steps included checking when the medication was selected; when the dose was removed from the container; and finally just after the dose was prepared and the medication was put away. Review of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-12-10 · tag F0554 — isolated
    Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to assess residents for self-administering medications for 1 of 2 residents sampled for accidents, (Resident (R)101), out of the total sample of 35. The findings include:Review of the facility policy titled, Guidelines for Self-Administration of Medications, dated 05/22/2018, revealed in the section designated Procedure, residents requesting to self-medicate or who had self-medication as a part of their plan of care were to be assessed using the observation Self Administration of Medication within the electronic health record (EHR). Per policy review, the results of the assessment were to be presented to the physician for evaluation and an order obtained for self-medication. Continued review revealed the order was to include the type of medication(s) the resident was able to self-medicate. Policy review revealed the resident and/or family/responsible party were to be informed of the results of the assessment and whether the resident had been determined to safely self-administer…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-12-10 · tag F0582 — isolated
    Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to provide a Skilled Nursing Facility Advanced Beneficiary Notice of Non-coverage (SNF ABN) form 2 of 3 residents reviewed for beneficiary notification out of the total sample of 35, (Resident (R)6 and 108). Specifically, the facility failed to issue a SNF ABN to Resident #6 and Resident #108 when the facility notified the residents that they were discharged from Medicare Part A services, even though their benefit days had not been exhausted.The findings include:Review of the Form Instructions Skilled Nursing Facility Advanced Beneficiary Notice of Non-coverage (SNF ABN) Form CMS-10055 (2024), revealed the SNF ABN Form provided information to residents so they could decide whether or not to get the care that might not be paid for by Medicare and assume financial responsibility for that care. Per review, SNFs must use the SNF ABN Form when applicable for SNF Prospective Payment System (PPS) services (Medicare Part A). Further…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-12-10 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to timely report an allegation of abuse for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for abuse, out of the total sample of 35, (R103).The findings include:Review of the facility policy titled, Abuse, Neglect and Exploitation Procedural Guidelines, revised 12/16/2024, revealed under the section titled Procedure the reporting/response noted any staff member, resident, visitor, or resident representative might report known or suspected abuse, exploitation, neglect, or misappropriation to local or state agencies. Per policy review, all alleged violations involving abuse, neglect, exploitation or mistreatment, including injuries of unknown source and misappropriation of resident property, were to be reported immediately; however, not later than two hours after the allegation was made if the events that caused the allegation involved abuse or result in serious bodily injury. Continued review revealed if the allegation did not involve abuse or serious…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-12-10 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to obtain an order for the use of oxygen for 1 of 4 residents reviewed for respiratory care out of the total sample of 35 (Resident (R)17).The findings include:Review of the facility policy titled, Administration of Oxygen, reviewed 12/13/2024, revealed a section titled , SOP Details that noted staff were to verify the physician's order for the procedure. Further review revealed in cases of emergency oxygen might be administered as a nursing intervention until a physician order may be obtained.Review of the Resident Face Sheet for R17 revealed the facility admitted the resident on 08/21/2025, diagnoses of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) with acute exacerbation, acute and chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia (low levels of oxygen in body tissue), and hypercapnia (elevated levels of carbon dioxide in the blood).Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment, with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 08/28/2025, revealed the facility assessed R17 as having a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-12-10 · tag F0700 — isolated
    Try different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure a resident was assessed for bed rail use and consent obtained for the use of the bed rails for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for accidents, out of the total sample of 35 residents (Resident (R)101). The findings include:Review of the facility policy titled, Guidelines for the Use of Bed Rails, dated 10/09/2017, revealed prior to the installation of bed rails, the facility was to attempt to use alternatives. Per review, if the alternatives attempted were not adequate to meet the resident's needs, the resident was assessed for the use of bed rails. Continued policy review revealed the bed rail assessment was to include review of risks including entrapment; and informed consent for the rails to be obtained from the resident or if applicable, the resident's representative. Further review revealed the facility must ensure the bed was appropriate for the resident and the bed rails were properly installed and maintained. In addition, review of the policy also revealed the use of bed rails…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-12-10 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure medication carts were clean, organized, and medications that were opened had an opened date for 5 of 5 medication carts observed (the medication carts involved were: Downtown, Berry, Bell 1, Bell 2, and TCU 1) Further observation revealed 10 total medication carts located within the facility. The findings include:Review of the facility policy titled, Medication Storage in the Facility-Storage of Medications, revised 11/2018, revealed medication storage areas were to be kept clean, well-lit, and free of clutter and extreme temperatures and humidity. Per policy review, certain medications or package types, such as IV solutions, multiple dose injectable vials, ophthalmics, nitroglycerine tablets, blood sugar testing solutions and strips, once opened, required an expiration date shorter than the manufacturer's expiration date to ensure medication purity and potency. Continued review revealed drugs dispensed in the manufacturer's original container were to carry the manufacturer's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-12-10 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure staff cleaned and disinfected glucometers (device used to monitor blood sugar levels) after use for 1 of 2 residents observed for glucometer checks, out of the total sample of 35.The findings include:Review of the facility policy titled, Glucometer Cleaning and Control Test Guidelines, dated 05/11/2016, revealed if glucometers were used from one resident to another, they should be cleaned and disinfected after each use. Further review revealed to see the manufacture [sic] guidelines for cleaning and disinfecting.Review of the manufacturer's guidelines for the facility's, Assure Prism multi Blood Glucose Monitoring System revealed the blood glucose monitor/meter was only to be used for testing multiple patients when standard precautions and the manufacturer's disinfection procedures were followed. Per review of the guidelines, the meter was to be cleaned and disinfected after use on each resident. Continued review revealed Super Sani-Cloth Germicidal Disposable Wipes had been…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-06-10 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, and review of the facility's policy, the facility failed to ensure residents received care to prevent pressure ulcers from developing for one of three residents reviewed for pressure ulcers (Resident (R) 8). The findings include: Review of facility policy, Guidelines for Weekly Skin Observation, reviewed 12/17/2024 revealed a purpose statement, to monitor the effectiveness of intervention for pressure reduction, identify areas of skin impairment in the early development stage and implement other preventative and/or treatment measures as indicated. Further review revealed item #6 stated, In addition to the Weekly Observation by the licensed nurse, the nursing assistant shall observe the skin for areas of impairment with bathing and daily dressing and pericare and notify the nurse if an area is identified. Review of facility policy, Turning and Repositioning, reviewed 12/16/2024 revealed an overview statement indicating, those requiring assistance to reposition while in bed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-07-14 · tag F0645 — isolated
    PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, interview, and document review, the facility failed to accurately complete a Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) for one (1) of one (1) resident, Resident #60, who was reviewed with a Mental Disorder (MD) or Intellectual Disability. Findings Included: A review of the document provided by the facility titled PASRR Quick Sheet. undated revealed New Admissions: If any of the following triggers a positive response, the level 1 (MAP 409) will be checked YES on section I and/or II and contact the PASARR office. Individual has a severe mental illness/behavioral health (BH) diagnosis. Ex: Schizophrenia, Bipolar Disorder, Major Depression Disorder, Anxiety Disorder, PTSD, etc. A review of Resident #60's Face Sheet revealed the facility admitted Resident #60 on 06/09/2022 with diagnoses that included Bipolar Disorder and Depression. A review of Resident #60's PASARR completed on 06/09/2022 revealed no diagnoses listed in Section two (2): Mental Illness diagnosis. Section two (2) instructions indicated to Identify whether the resident has a current…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2019-08-24 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review and interview it was determined the facility failed to maintain one freezer at safe temperatures out of the two freezers in the kitchen and the satellite kitchen. In addition, staff did not wear hairnets, wash hands, and apply gloves consistently when in the kitchen. The findings include: Observation with the Dietary Manager (DM), on 08/23/19 at 11:25 AM, revealed the freezer in the satellite kitchen had an internal temperature of 40 degrees, however the temperature reading on the gauge outside the unit showed that it was 10 degrees on the inside. Observation further revealed there was a package of okra and a package of French fries were thawed out and lying on the shelf in the freezer. Interview with the DM, on 08/23/19 at 11:25 AM, revealed the freezer had been out of commission for a while. It was cooling but not freezing. The DM stated he had put an out of service note on the freezer but it was not there now. The DM stated he did not know how long the okra and fries had been in the freezer. The DM revealed if the food had been served to the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-08-24 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, record review, and review of facility policy it was determined the facility failed to keep a clean and orderly environment. Observation on 08/23/19 at 9:00 AM, revealed birdseed was stored in one clean linen closet on the Downtown unit out of the seven units in the facility. Further observation, on 08/23/19 at 9:05 AM with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #1, revealed the birdseed bag was opened and there were flying bugs in the bag. The findings include: Review of the facility policy Guidelines for Handling Linen, revised on 05/11/16, revealed the facility established procedures for the cleaning of linen to ensure all resident received fresh linens. The purpose of the policy was to prevent contamination of clean linens. Observation, on 08/23/19 at 9:00 AM, revealed the unlocked linen closet on the Downtown unit had resident gowns, sheets, and pillowcases on the shelves. In addition, two closed containers and one opened bag of birdseed was sitting on the floor in the clean linen room. There was birdseed lying loose on the floor under the shelves.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to TRILOGY HEALTH SERVICES — 123 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 3 of 54.2-1.2 vs chain
Health inspection 2 of 53.5-1.5 vs chain
Staffing 3 of 53.3-0.3 vs chain
Quality measures 5 of 54.8+0.2 vs chain
The other 122 homes this chain runs (chain average 4.2★, per CMS)
1 of 5Heritage TheFindlay, OH 1 of 5The Oaks Rehabilitation and Healthcare CenterZanesville, OH 2 of 5Homewood Health CampusLebanon, IN 2 of 5Violet Springs Health CampusPickerington, OH 2 of 5Woodmont Health CampusBoonville, IN 3 of 5Cobblestone Crossings Health CampusTerre Haute, IN 3 of 5Creasy Springs Health CampusLafayette, IN 3 of 5Cumberland Pointe Health CampusWest Lafayette, IN 3 of 5Forest Park Health CampusRichmond, IN 3 of 5Greenleaf Health CampusElkhart, IN 3 of 5River Terrace Health CampusMadison, IN 3 of 5Scenic Hills At The MonasteryFerdinand, IN 3 of 5Smiths Mill Health CampusNew Albany, OH 3 of 5Springhurst Health CampusGreenfield, IN 3 of 5Springs Of Richmond, TheRichmond, IN 3 of 5St Mary Healthcare CenterLafayette, IN 3 of 5Stonegate Health CampusLapeer, MI 3 of 5Sun Prairie Senior LivingSun Prairie, WI 3 of 5Taylor Springs Health CampusGahanna, OH 3 of 5The Willows at Fritz FarmLexington, KY 3 of 5The Willows at HamburgLexington, KY 3 of 5The Willows at HarrodsburgHarrodsburg, KY 3 of 5The Willows at SpringhurstLouisville, KY 3 of 5Villages At Oak Ridge, TheWashington, IN 3 of 5Waunakee Valley Senior LivingWaunakee, WI 3 of 5Wellbrooke Of CarmelCarmel, IN 4 of 5Arlington Place Health CampusIndianapolis, IN 4 of 5Ashford Place Health CampusShelbyville, IN 4 of 5Aspen Place Health CampusGreensburg, IN 4 of 5Avalon Springs Health CampusValparaiso, IN 4 of 5Bethany Pointe Health CampusAnderson, IN 4 of 5Blair Ridge Health CampusPeru, IN 4 of 5Bridgepointe Health CampusVincennes, IN 4 of 5Cedar Creek Health CampusLowell, IN 4 of 5Clearvista Lake Health CampusIndianapolis, IN 4 of 5Forest Springs Health CampusLouisville, KY 4 of 5Glen Oaks Health CampusNew Castle, IN 4 of 5Glen Ridge Health CampusLouisville, KY 4 of 5Meadows Of Delphos TheDelphos, OH 4 of 5Meadows Of Ottawa TheOttawa, OH

Showing 40 of 122; lowest-rated first.

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Investor-owned

CMS ownership filings flag an owner of this facility as a real-estate investment trust (REIT). That’s a fact worth knowing: peer-reviewed research links private-equity and REIT ownership to lower staffing and more citations on average — though any individual home can run well or poorly regardless. Read the inspection and staffing record above on its own merits.

  • AMERICAN HEALTHCARE REIT INC — REIT · 100.00% share · 5% Or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest
  • TRILOGY REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST — REIT · 100.00% share · 5% Or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest

Source: CMS SNF ownership filings (PECOS). These flags are self-reported and undercount — federal auditors (GAO) and researchers find CMS captures only a fraction of true private-equity and REIT ties, so the absence of a flag on other homes is not proof they lack investor owners. How investor ownership affects care →

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
CONTINENTAL MERGER SUB LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF100%since 10/01/2021
ORIX REAL ESTATE CAPITAL LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER MORTGAGE INTERESTsince 01/01/2023
BARNEY, LEIGHIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODYsince 11/01/2019
CONNER, GREGORYIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODYsince 06/03/2021
DAVIS, DAVIDIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODYsince 08/21/2017
MCNAMARA, DONALDIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODYsince 08/01/2024
MEHAFFEY, TODDIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODYsince 01/31/2022
PIETROWSKI, CRISTINAIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 01/31/2022
PROSKY, DANNYIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODYsince 12/01/2015
WILLHITE, GABRIELIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODYsince 08/15/2023
CORBIN, KATHYIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/10/2010
FIGHTMASTER, LISAIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 03/23/2015
MALULEKE, OPPAHIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 05/02/2025
SALEEM, WAQARIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2025
AMERICAN HEALTHCARE REIT HOLDINGS LPOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 12/01/2015
AMERICAN HEALTHCARE REIT INCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 10/01/2021
GAHC3 TRILOGY JV LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 10/01/2021
GAHC4 TRILOGY JV LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 10/01/2021
TRILOGY INVESTORS LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 10/01/2021
TRILOGY MANAGEMENT SERVICES LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 05/02/2025
TRILOGY REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUSTOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 10/01/2021
TRILOGY REIT HOLDINGS LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 12/01/2015

CMS files one row per role, so the 28 rows in the source record cover these 22 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

10 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$13.3M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-2.2%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$2.3M
Related-party expense17% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 25%Medicare 16%Other / private 59%

This home reported $2.3M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 17% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$338per resident / day
operating cost
$10,266per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$330per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in KY

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Kentucky Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Kentucky
$9,718/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$11,254/mo
Nursing home (private)
$5,528/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 185132. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-12-10, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next