No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Taylor Springs Health Campus

748 Taylor Road, Gahanna, OH 43230 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 58 certified beds · (614) 863-6384 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (614) 863-6384 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse-prevention, restraint, or reporting citation — no harm found (F0609) — cited Jun 20242 actual-harm citations$17,225 in federal fines
Insights

The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.

Worth asking about
  • it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • it has 2 actual-harm citations
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (34) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $17,225 in federal fines (most recent 2025-04-28)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

3/5
CMS overall
3 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 2 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 3 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 5 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★ 2/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
(614) 471-9654 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
Medassist<0.1 mi
735 Taylor Rd · (614) 367-2425 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
690 Taylor Rd · (614) 929-7930 · Call to confirm hours
Park
940 Gahanna Pkwy · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 5 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 4 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 2 to 3 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating3★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased12.1%5.3%15.4%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight12.0%6.2%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%0.2%0.9%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.0%0.4%2.0%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms7.6%30.1%6.5%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.1%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury3.0%3.2%3.3%typical
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened7.4%6.1%16.1%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication7.2%25.5%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine96.8%94.5%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers1.6%3.4%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control19.6%21.4%21.2%typical
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table1.4%8.8%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication1.0%1.2%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine77.5%75.6%79.4%typical
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission24.2%24.9%22.6%typical
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit7.0%12.9%12.0%better

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

62.8% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 169 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

62.8%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
12.1%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
39.4%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.41U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.27hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.05hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.10hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 39.4% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 66 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.41 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 70% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 13% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF62.8%CMS range 54.1–69.951.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024better than U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF12.1%CMS range 8.7–16.010.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge39.4%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge56.1%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge39.4%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified80.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting79.5%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge88.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened0.0%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization5.3%CMS range 3.2–8.97.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.001.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.92
RN hours/ resident / day
0.97
LPN hours/ resident / day
1.68
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.58
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.52
RN hoursweekends
46.8%
Total nursing turnover
50.0%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 58 beds and averages 51.5 residents a day — about 89% occupied, or roughly 6 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.58 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.92 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.68 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.06 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.79 on weekdays — 19% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.09 to 0.52 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 47% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

13
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-04-28)
12
at the previous standard inspection (2023-04-06)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

34 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 22 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Actual harm · G2025-04-28 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 2. Medical record review revealed Resident #27 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including anxiety disorder, depression, psychotic disorder with delusions, contractures and cerebellar stroke. Review of the Occupational Therapy (OT) Evaluation and Plan of Treatment dated 02/03/23 revealed the resident was referred to OT due to a decline in the upper extremity range of motion (ROM) and need for contracture prevention. The resident's bilateral upper extremity ROM was impaired with functional limitations present due to contracture and declining in independence with hygiene ADL's. OT to address contracture impairment and further assess and order/fabricate an orthotic device. The focus of plan of treatment was restoration, compensation and adaptation. Review of the OT Discharge summary dated [DATE] revealed the resident was discharged to the hospital. Review of the medical record revealed no evidence the resident was screened or evaluated by therapy services, received ROM services or other services/devices to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · G2024-04-05 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on closed medical record review, emergency room record review, facility policy review and interview, the facility failed to develop and implement an individualized, effective and comprehensive pain management program for Resident #10 who experienced pain following a fall. Actual harm occurred on 02/25/24 at 7:30 A.M. when Resident #10 sustained a fall with swelling and complaints of pain (rated an eight on a scale of one to 10) to her left wrist. The resident was provided one dose of pain medication (at 8:16 A.M) which was noted to be ineffective following the incident but was not provided any other pain medication, pain management or transferred to the emergency room until 02/25/24 at approximately 2:00 P.M. (over six hours later). The resident was assessed to have a closed fracture of distal ends of left radius and ulna (wrist). This affected one resident (#10) of three residents reviewed for accidents. The facility census was 45. Findings Include: Review of the closed medical record for Resident #10,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-06 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, interviews, policy review, review of the hospital record, and review of information from the Ohio Board of Nursing, the facility failed to ensure pressure ulcer weekly assessments, including staging, were completed per the professional standards of practice. This affected one (Resident #41) out of three residents reviewed for pressure ulcer care. The facility census was 55.Findings Included:Review of the medical record for Resident #41 revealed an admission date of 12/14/21. Diagnoses included sequelae of cerebral infarction, atherosclerotic heart disease of native coronary artery, old myocardial infarction, type two diabetes mellitus, hyperlipidemia, neuromuscular dysfunction of bladder, anxiety disorder, mild cognitive impairment of uncertain or unknow etiology, major depressive disorder, adult failure to thrive, hypertension, and gastro-esophageal reflux disease.Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Resident #41 had no psychosis, no verbal or…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-04-28 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 4. Review of Resident #1's medical record revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Her diagnoses included unspecified dementia, schizo-affective disorder, obsessive-compulsive disorder, generalized anxiety disorder, major depressive disorder, and obstructive sleep apnea. Review of Resident #1's physician's orders revealed she had an order to receive Melatonin 2 milligrams (mg) by mouth every night at bedtime related to insomnia. The order had been in place since 01/31/22. Review of Resident #1's active care plans revealed the resident did not have a care plan in place to address insomnia or the use of Melatonin as a sleep aid. Findings were verified by RN #255. On 04/28/25 at 11:40 A.M., an interview with RN #255 revealed she was the staff member that was responsible for completing the resident's comprehensive care plans. She acknowledged Resident #1 did not have a care plan in place to address her diagnosis of insomnia, or the use of Melatonin on a nightly basis as a sleep aid, since 01/31/22.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-28 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure resident rooms and equipment were clean and sanitary. This affected one resident (#27) of 19 residents sampled. The census was 44. Findings include: Medical record review revealed Resident #27 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including anxiety disorder, depression, malnutrition, and adult failure to thrive. Review of the electronic Physician Orders dated April 2025 revealed Resident #27 received enteral feedings (a method of delivering nutrition directly into the gastrointestinal tract via a tube) daily for 20 hours. The resident also had his gastrostomy tube flushed with water before and after administration of medications and tube feeding residual was also checked twice a day. On 04/24/25 at 3:12 P.M., observation of Resident #27's room revealed a splattered dried yellow substance that was splattered across the walls, the ceiling including his ceiling light and on his personal items sitting on the stand where his…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-28 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure one resident's (#12) Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments was coded accurately in the area of oxygen. This affected one resident (#12) of 16 sampled residents. The facility census was 44. Findings Include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #12 revealed an initial admission date of 12/18/24 with the last readmission of 02/07/25 with the diagnoses including but not limited to metabolic encephalopathy, pneumonitis due to inhalation of food and vomit, cerebrovascular accident with right sided hemiplegia, epilepsy, diabetes mellitus, dysphagia, anemia, age related physical debility, obesity, hypoxemia, sepsis, severe protein calorie malnutrition, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, altered mental status and acute respiratory failure with hypoxia. Review of the resident's plan of care revealed no care plan addressing the resident's oxygen use. Review of the resident's monthly physician orders for April 2025 identified ordered dated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-28 · tag F0645 — isolated
    PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure an admission PASRR screen was completed accurately to reflect all known mental illness diagnoses. This affected one (Resident #26) of one residents reviewed for PASRR. The facility census was 44. Findings include: Review of Resident #26's medical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. His diagnoses included an unspecified (affective) mood disorder and anxiety disorder. Review of Resident #26's PASRR identification screen dated 08/24/24 revealed the resident was being screened for a preadmission screening (PAS) for an admission from the community. Section (E.) of the PAS was to include all known diagnoses of any of the mental disorders listed in that section. Mental disorders in that section included mood disorder and panic or other severe anxiety disorder among the seven that were listed. The PAS did not have mood disorder or a severe anxiety disorder marked despite the resident admitting to the facility with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-28 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure comprehensive care plans were revised and accurately reflected the residents' status. This affected two residents (#27 and #34) of 19 sampled reviewed for care plans. The census was 44. Findings include: 1. Medical record review revealed Resident #27 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including constipation, history of fecal impaction, anemia, contractures and cerebellar stroke. Review of the electronic Medication Administration Record dated April 2025 revealed Resident #27 received the following medications for pain: Tylenol 500 milligrams (mg) twice a day, biofreeze 4 % twice a day, gabapentin 100 (mg) at bedtime and tramadol 50 (mg) three times a day for moderate to severe pain. Review of the medical record revealed as of 04/28/25 revealed no evidence the resident had a pressure injury. Review of the care plan: At Risk for Pain dated 01/17/22 revealed problem areas included a pressure injury, gastroesophageal reflux…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-28 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 3. Medical record review revealed Resident #27 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including anxiety disorder, depression, psychotic disorder with delusions, contractures and cerebellar stroke. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #27 was cognitively intact for daily-decision making, was dependent on staff for functional abilities including showering/bathing and had functional limitations of upper and lower extremities. Review of the care plan: ADL revised 03/13/25 revealed the resident required staff assistance completing all ADL tasks completely and safely. Review of the electronic Point of Care History dated January 2025 revealed Resident #27 received one bath, on 01/28/25, during the month of January 2025. Review of the paper Shower Sheet documentation between January 2025 through March 2025 revealed no additional showers were provided for the month of January 2025. Review of the Physician Orders dated April 2025 and the unit Shower Schedule revealed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-28 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolated
    Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 2. Record review revealed Resident #42 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Pertinent diagnoses included: other toxic encephalopathy, unspecified atrial fibrillation, dehydration, strange and inexplicable behavior, generalized anxiety, repeated falls. Review of Resident #42's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 04/03/25, revealed a brief interview for mental status (BIMS) score of 5 out of 15 which signified severe cognitive impairment. Record review of care plan for Resident #42 dated 03/31/25 revealed resident was at risk for limited activity engagement due to physical impairments and that interests included sports, pets and inspirations. Record review revealed progress note dated 04/11/25 noting resident #42 had increased restlessness and anxiety. Physician order on 04/15/25 requested staff document number of times resident yelled out. Observation on 04/21/25 at 12:44 pm of Resident #42 laying in bed with head elevated, yelling out three times a request to go to the dining room. Interview on 04/22/25…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-28 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 3. Record review revealed Resident #42 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Pertinent diagnoses included: other toxic encephalopathy, unspecified atrial fibrillation, dehydration, strange and inexplicable behavior, generalized anxiety, repeated falls. Review of wound care consult for Resident #42 dated 03/22/25 (prior to resident's admission to facility) which had pressure reducing recommendations for frequent turning and minimizing elevation of head of bed. Review of care plan for Resident #42 revealed a 03/28/25 goal of skin integrity and suggestion that resident be turned and repositioned for comfort. Review of physician orders revealed order dated 03/31/25 for pressure reducing cushion for wheelchair with frequency of three times a day. Review of Resident #42's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 04/03/25, revealed severe cognitive impairment and required substantial/maximum assistance for toileting hygiene, showering, lower body dressing, putting on footwear and personal hygiene. Resident #42 was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-28 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, and interviews, the facility failed to obtain a physician order and monitor a non-invasive ventilation device (Bi-pap) for Resident #37. This affected one resident (#37) of four residents reviewed for respiratory care. The facility census was 44. Findings Include: Review of the medical record for Resident #37 revealed an initial admission date of 02/08/25 with the diagnoses including but not limited to metabolic encephalopathy, acute respiratory failure with hypoxia, cerebral infarct, atherosclerotic heart disease, obesity, obstructive and reflux uropathy, retention of urine, diabetes mellitus, obstructive sleep apnea, hypertension, low back pain, benign prostatic hyperplasia, pulmonary embolism, contusion of spleen and encounter for surgical aftercare. Review of the resident's plan of care revealed no care plan addressing the resident's use of oxygen or Bi-pap. Review of the resident's comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 22 citations
  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-28 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure one resident's (#29) antihypertensive medication (medication used to lower the blood pressure) per the physician ordered parameters. This affected one resident (#29) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The facility census was 44. Findings Include: Review of the medical record for Resident #29 revealed an initial admission date of 03/22/22 with the diagnoses including but not limited to dysphagia, aphasia, dysarthria, atrial septal defect, asthma, atrial fibrillation, hypertensive urgency, hypertensive heart disease with heart failure, obesity, heart failure and hyperlipidemia. Review of the resident's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident had no cognitive deficit. Review of the monthly physician orders for April 2025 identified an order dated 12/26/23 Metoprolol 25 milligrams (mg) by mouth twice daily with the special instructions to hold if systolic blood pressure (SBP) was less than…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-28 · tag F0791 — failed to provide routine dental services — isolated
    Provide or obtain dental services for each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, interviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure one resident (#29) received emergent and/or routine dental care. This affected one resident (#29) of two residents reviewed for dental services. The facility census was 44. Findings Include: Review of the medical record for Resident #29 revealed an initial admission date of 03/22/22 with the diagnoses including but not limited to dysphagia, aphasia, dysarthria, atrial septal defect, asthma, atrial fibrillation, hypertensive urgency, hypertensive heart disease with heart failure, obesity, heart failure and hyperlipidemia. Review of the plan of care dated 03/23/22 revealed the resident had potential for oral/dental health problems related to two broken teeth and resident reports difficulty chewing. Interventions included administer medications as ordered, monitor/document for side effects and effectiveness, coordinate arrangements for dental care, transportation as needed/as ordered, diet as ordered,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-28 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — isolated
    Implement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, infection control log review, policy review and interview, the facility failed to administer antibiotics as ordered. This affected one resident (#27) of five residents sampled for unnecessary medications. The census was 44. Findings include: Medical record review revealed Resident #27 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including anxiety disorder, depression, psychotic disorder with delusions, contractures and cerebellar stroke. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #27 was cognitively intact for daily-decision making. Review of the Nurse Practitioner Progress Note Details dated 03/04/25 revealed Resident #27 was seen for evaluation of some right lower extremity (RLE) edema and mild pain. The assessment and plan revealed very mild cellulitis of the right lower extremity but the resident was insistent on the fact that his RLE was more painful and swollen, as well as, some mild erythema. Will start Resident #27 on a short…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-25 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and medical record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident who was dependent on staff for eating received timely meal assistance. This affected one resident (#44) of 10 residents who required assistance at meals. The facility census was 48. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #44 revealed an admission date of 09/23/24 with diagnoses including dementia, osteoporosis, contracture of left hand, and muscle weakness. Review of Resident #44's comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed she had severely impaired cognition. She was dependent on staff for eating Review of Resident #44's diet order dated 12/18/24 revealed an order for a puree diet. Review of Resident #44's profile care guide last updated 01/31/25 revealed she required physical assistance with eating. Observation on 02/26/25 at 8:01 A.M. revealed Resident #44 sitting in the dining room with a plate in front of her, she was not eating. At that time, only one…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-06-13 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review, facility self-reported incident (SRI) review, and facility policy review the facility failed to timely report an allegation of abuse by Resident #3 to the executive director and state agency in a timely manner. This affected one resident (#3) of three residents reviewed for abuse. The facility census was 45. Findings include: Review of the medical record for the Resident #3 revealed an admission date of 04/26/24 with diagnoses including gastro-esophageal reflux disease, hypertension, osteoporosis, and diverticulosis of intestine. Review of the comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed the Resident #3 had a severe cognitive impairment. Review of the progress note dated 06/08/24 at 3:06 A.M. revealed Resident #3 called the police and reported that a man had come into her hotel room and had his way with her. The police verified that the complaint was unsubstantiated; therefore, they left. The resident was confused and called people to pick her up…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-04-05 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on closed record review, staff interview, and emergency room discharge instructions, the facility failed to provide care for a broken left wrist for one (Resident #10) of three residents reviewed for accidents. The facility census was 45. Findings include: Review of the closed medical record for Resident #10, revealed an admission date of 02/16/24 and a discharge date of 3/11/24. Diagnoses included displaced bicondylar fracture of right tibia, subsequent encounter for closed fracture with routine healing, age related osteoporosis without current pathological fracture, and unspecified dementia, unspecified severity, with other behavioral disturbances. Review of the most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of 5 out of 15 which revealed severe cognitive impairment. Resident #10 was assessed to require substantial/maximal assistance with toilet hygiene, shower/bathe, lying to sitting on the side of the bed, toilet transfer and chair/bed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-04-05 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on closed medical record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to administer medication as ordered by the physician for one ( Resident #10) out of three residents reviewed for medication. The facility census was 45. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #10, revealed an admission date of 02/16/24 and a discharge date of 3/11/24. Diagnoses included displaced bicondylar fracture of right tibia, subsequent encounter for closed fracture with routine healing, age related osteoporosis without current pathological fracture, and unspecified dementia, unspecified severity, with other behavioral disturbances. Review of the most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of 5 out of 15 which revealed severe cognitive impairment. Resident #10 was assessed to require substantial/maximal assistance with toilet hygiene, shower/bathe, lying to sitting on the side of the bed, toilet transfer and chair/bed to chair transfer…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-04-05 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on closed medical record review and interviews, the facility failed to maintain an accurate medical record for a controlled drug for one ( Resident #10) out of three residents reviewed for medication. The facility census was 45. Findings include: Review of the closed medical record for Resident #10, revealed an admission date of 02/16/24 and a discharge date of 3/11/24. Diagnoses included displaced bicondylar fracture of right tibia, subsequent encounter for closed fracture with routine healing, age related osteoporosis without current pathological fracture, and unspecified dementia, unspecified severity, with other behavioral disturbances. Review of the most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of 5 out of 15 which revealed severe cognitive impairment. The resident was assessed to require substantial/maximal assistance with toilet hygiene, shower/bathe, lying to sitting on the side of the bed, toilet transfer and chair/bed to chair…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-02-26 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — widespread
    Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of call lights response reports, review of concern logs, interviews, and observation the facility failed to ensure sufficient staffing to provide care and services to residents. This affected three residents (#11, #20, and #52) of four residents interviewed with the potential to affect all 50 residents. Finding included: Observation on 02/26/24 at 8:00 A.M. during the initial tour revealed there were several resident call lights activated on the 100 and 300 halls. Four nurses were observed administering medication and there were four State Tested Nurse Aides providing care. 1. Review of Resident #11's call light response report dated 02/26/24 revealed on 02/26/24 at 4:30 A.M. the call light went off for 22 minutes and two seconds and at 7:01 A.M. it went off 33 minutes and 28 seconds. Interview on 02/26/24 at 8:15 A.M. and 11:10 A.M., with Resident #11 revealed she was just admitted on Thursday, but the call light response time was not always prompt. The resident reported she had to wait half an hour to 45 minutes for someone to answer her call light. Once she waited…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-26 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, review of shower schedule, review of shower sheets, review of concern log, review of resident council minutes, interviews, and policy review the facility failed to ensure dependent residents received showers per preference. This affected two residents (#20, #52) of three reviewed for showers. Findings included: 1. Closed record review revealed Resident #52 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and discharged back to the Assisting Living on 02/23/24 per the wife's request. The resident's diagnoses included dementia, need for assistance with personal care, difficulty walking, muscle weakness encephalitis, and other abnormalities of gait and mobility. Review of Resident #52's activity of daily living (ADL) plan of care dated 02/14/24 revealed the resident requires staff assistance to complete self-care and mobility functional tasks completely and safely. Offer nail care and facial shaving on shower days and as needed or requested. Notify nursing of refusals. Review of Resident #52's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2023-04-06 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, staff interviews, and facility policy review the facility failed to properly store and date opened food items and failed to have dietary staff secure loose hair in a hair restraint during food preparation. This had the potential to affect all 50 residents in the facility. The facility census was 50. Findings include: During the initial tour of the kitchen on 04/03/23 from 8:20 A.M. to 9:15 A.M. the following was observed in Freezer #1: - A bag of frozen plant based meatballs was placed inside an opened cardboard box. The plant based meatballs was exposed to the air. The meatballs were not dated. This was confirmed with Dietary Supervisor (DS) #167 at 8:35 A.M. - A bag of frozen plant based patties was placed inside an opened cardboard box. The plant based patties were exposed to the air. The patties were not dated. This was confirmed with DS #167 at 8:35 A.M. - A bag of frozen hamburger patties was placed inside an opened cardboard box. The hamburger patties were exposed to the air. The patties were not dated. This was confirmed with DS #167 at 8:35 A.M. - A…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-04-06 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, resident and staff interview, medical record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to provide adequate accommodations for a resident to elevate his legs when he was out of bed as ordered. This affected one resident (#42) of two reviewed for environment. The facility census was 50. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #42 revealed an admission date on 03/03/23. Medical diagnoses included acute and chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia, chronic obstructive pulmonary disorder (COPD), hypertensive chronic kidney disease Stage 3, lymphedema, morbid obesity, and Type II Diabetes Mellitus. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #42 had mildly impaired cognition and scored 12 out of 15 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) assessment. Resident #42 required extensive assistance from one to two staff to complete Activities of Daily Living (ADLs). Review of the physician orders dated March 2023…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-04-06 · tag F0623 — isolated
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to provide a written notice of transfer to a resident upon being transferred to the hospital. This affected one (#44) of one resident reviewed for hospitalization. The facility census was 50. Findings Include: Review of the closed medical record for former Resident #44 revealed an admission date on [DATE]. The resident expired on [DATE]. Medical diagnoses included unspecified dementia, congestive heart failure (CHF), pleural effusion, morbid obesity, schizophrenia, depression, muscle weakness, dysphagia, and encephalopathy (a brain disease). Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #44's cognition was not assessed. However, per staff assessment, Resident #44 had moderately impaired cognition. Resident #44 required extensive assistance from one to two staff to complete Activities of Daily Living (ADLs). Review of the progress notes revealed on [DATE] at 10:17 A.M.,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-04-06 · tag F0625 — isolated
    Notify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to provide a written bed hold notice to a resident upon being transferred to the hospital. This affected one (#44) of one resident reviewed for hospitalization. The facility census was 50. Findings Include: Review of the closed medical record for former Resident #44 revealed an admission date on [DATE]. The resident expired on [DATE]. Medical diagnoses included unspecified dementia, congestive heart failure (CHF), pleural effusion, morbid obesity, schizophrenia, depression, muscle weakness, dysphagia, and encephalopathy (a brain disease). Review of Resident #44's payer source revealed the resident had Medicaid. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #44's cognition was not assessed. However, per staff assessment, Resident #44 had moderately impaired cognition. Resident #44 required extensive assistance from one to two staff to complete Activities of Daily Living…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-04-06 · tag F0644 — isolated
    Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview, document review, and policy review the facility failed to coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review (PASARR) for Resident #1 when she had a new diagnosis of schizophrenia and Resident #8 when they did not have a correct mental health diagnosis. This affected two residents (#1 and #8) of two residents reviewed for PASARR. The facility census was 50. Findings include: 1. Record review of Resident #1 revealed an admission date of 01/28/22 with pertinent diagnoses of: schizoaffective disorder depressive type 9/27/22, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, asthma, hypertensive heart disease with heart failure, heart failure, obsessive-compulsive disorder, unspecified dementia, generalized anxiety disorder, hypertension, other sleep disorders, and functional urinary incontinence. Review of the 03/02/23 quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment revealed Resident #1 was cognitively intact and required physical help in bathing, supervision for personal hygiene…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-04-06 · tag F0646 — isolated
    Notify the appropriate authorities when residents with MD or ID services has a significant change in condition.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview, document review, and policy review the facility failed to notify the state mental health authority for Resident #1 when she had a new diagnosis of schizophrenia and Resident #8 when had a new mental health diagnoses of vascular dementia, major depressive disorder, and psychotic disorder with delusions. This affected two residents (#1 and #8) of two residents reviewed for mental health screening. The facility census was 50. Findings include: 1. Record review of Resident #1 revealed an admission date of 01/28/22 with pertinent diagnosis of: schizoaffective disorder depressive type 9/27/22, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, asthma, hypertensive heart disease with heart failure, heart failure, obsessive-compulsive disorder, unspecified dementia, generalized anxiety disorder, hypertension, other sleep disorders, and functional urinary incontinence. Review of the 03/02/23 quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment revealed Resident #1 was cognitively intact and required physical help in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-04-06 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person centered dental care plan. This affected one resident (#6) of two residents reviewed for dental care. The facility census was 50. Findings include: Resident observation on 04/03/23 at 10:45 A.M. revealed Resident #6 had natural teeth with several broken or missing, teeth were discolored. Gums were moist and pink in color with no bleeding observed. Tongue was pink in color. No food particles were observed. Record review revealed Resident #6 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of Parkinson's disease, vascular dementia, weakness and depression disorder. The resident had a diet order for regular textured foods with special instructions for mechanical soft foods on request by resident. Record review revealed Resident #6's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #6 indicated oral pain and difficulty with chewing. The MDS revealed Resident #6 had obvious or…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-04-06 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to appropriately assess and monitor pressures ulcers. This affected one resident (#152) of four residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. The census was 50. Findings Include: Record review revealed Resident #152 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Her diagnoses were encounter for surgical aftercare following surgery of the skin and subcutaneous tissue, fibromyalgia, cervical disc degeneration, rheumatoid arthritis, urinary tract infection, morbid obesity, lymphedema, pressure ulcer of sacral region, depression, anxiety disorder, type II diabetes, hypothyroidism, overactive bladder, hyperlipidemia, bacteremia, rectal abscess, age related physical debility, weakness, and sepsis. Review of her Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 02/16/23, revealed she was cognitively intact. Review of Resident #152's pressure ulcer skin logs and assessments, dated 02/16/23 and 02/17/23, revealed she had three pressure ulcers…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-04-06 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on resident and staff interview, observation, and record review the facility failed to store drugs in locked compartments when staff left an inhaler and nasal spray in a resident's room. This affected one resident (#1) of five residents reviewed for medications. The facility census was 50. Findings Include: Record review of Resident #1 revealed an admission date of 01/28/22 with pertinent diagnoses of: schizoaffective disorder depressive type 9/27/22, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, asthma, hypertensive heart disease with heart failure, heart failure, obsessive-compulsive disorder, unspecified dementia, generalized anxiety disorder, hypertension, other sleep disorders, and functional urinary incontinence. Review of the 03/02/23 quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment revealed Resident #1 was cognitively intact and required physical help in bathing, supervision for personal hygiene and was independent in all other activities of daily living. The resident used a walker to aid in mobility and was frequently incontinent of bowel and bladder. Observation of Resident #1's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-04-06 · tag F0791 — failed to provide routine dental services — isolated
    Provide or obtain dental services for each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, policy review, and record review the facility failed to provide emergency dental care. This affected one resident (#6) of two residents reviewed for dental services. The facility census was 50. Findings include: Resident interview on 04/03/23 at 10:39 A.M. revealed Resident #6 complained of oral discomfort when chewing meat. Resident #6 stated he had requested to see a dentist several times to staff. Resident observation on 04/03/23 at 10:45 A.M. revealed Resident #6 had natural teeth with several broken or missing, teeth were discolored. Gums were moist and pink in color with no bleeding observed. Tongue was pink in color. No food particles were observed. Resident observation on 04/05/23 at 8:35 A.M. revealed resident requested to see a dentist to Registered Nurse (RN) #195 because of oral discomfort. Record review revealed Resident #6 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of Parkinson's disease, vascular dementia, weakness and depression disorder. The resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-04-06 · tag F0849 — isolated
    Arrange for the provision of hospice services or assist the resident in transferring to a facility that will arrange for the provision of hospice services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review, staff interview, review of the hospice binder, and review of the hospice contract, the facility failed to ensure continuity of care for a resident receiving hospice services when hospice progress notes were not readily available to facility staff caring for a resident. This affected one resident (#35) of one resident reviewed for hospice services. The facility census was 50. Findings Include: Review of the medical record for Resident #35 revealed an admission date on 02/01/22. Medical diagnoses included encephalopathy (a brain disease), unspecified dementia, unspecified psychosis, developmental disorder of scholastic skills, and other forms of scute ischemic heart disease. Review of the physician orders dated March 2023 revealed Resident #35 had the following order dated 02/11/23: admitted under hospice services related to other symptoms and signs involving cognitive functions following cerebral infarction. Review of the significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment revealed Resident #35's cognition was not assessed. However, pre staff…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-04-06 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — isolated
    Implement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to adequately follow antibiotic stewardship procedures prior to the ordering and administering of antibiotics. This affected one resident (#33) of two residents reviewed for antibiotic use. The census was 50. Findings Include: Record review revealed Resident #33 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Her diagnoses were encephalopathy, sepsis, enterocolitis due to CDiff, acute respiratory failure, shock, pneumonia, dementia, acute posthemorrhagic anemia, hyperlipidemia, hyperosmolality and hypernatremia, acute kidney failure, major depressive disorder, insomnia, melena, hematemesis, hypertension, altered mental status, and elevated white blood cell count. Review of Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 02/12/23, revealed she had a significant cognitive impairment. Review of Resident #33's progress note, dated 03/30/23, revealed Resident #33's family member was at the facility and requested a urinalysis to be…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$17,225 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

  • $17,225 — penalty dated 2025-04-28

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to TRILOGY HEALTH SERVICES — 123 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 3 of 54.2-1.2 vs chain
Health inspection 2 of 53.5-1.5 vs chain
Staffing 3 of 53.3-0.3 vs chain
Quality measures 5 of 54.8+0.2 vs chain
The other 122 homes this chain runs (chain average 4.2★, per CMS)
1 of 5Heritage TheFindlay, OH 1 of 5The Oaks Rehabilitation and Healthcare CenterZanesville, OH 2 of 5Homewood Health CampusLebanon, IN 2 of 5Violet Springs Health CampusPickerington, OH 2 of 5Woodmont Health CampusBoonville, IN 3 of 5Cobblestone Crossings Health CampusTerre Haute, IN 3 of 5Creasy Springs Health CampusLafayette, IN 3 of 5Cumberland Pointe Health CampusWest Lafayette, IN 3 of 5Forest Park Health CampusRichmond, IN 3 of 5Franciscan Health Care CenterLouisville, KY 3 of 5Greenleaf Health CampusElkhart, IN 3 of 5River Terrace Health CampusMadison, IN 3 of 5Scenic Hills At The MonasteryFerdinand, IN 3 of 5Smiths Mill Health CampusNew Albany, OH 3 of 5Springhurst Health CampusGreenfield, IN 3 of 5Springs Of Richmond, TheRichmond, IN 3 of 5St Mary Healthcare CenterLafayette, IN 3 of 5Stonegate Health CampusLapeer, MI 3 of 5Sun Prairie Senior LivingSun Prairie, WI 3 of 5The Willows at Fritz FarmLexington, KY 3 of 5The Willows at HamburgLexington, KY 3 of 5The Willows at HarrodsburgHarrodsburg, KY 3 of 5The Willows at SpringhurstLouisville, KY 3 of 5Villages At Oak Ridge, TheWashington, IN 3 of 5Waunakee Valley Senior LivingWaunakee, WI 3 of 5Wellbrooke Of CarmelCarmel, IN 4 of 5Arlington Place Health CampusIndianapolis, IN 4 of 5Ashford Place Health CampusShelbyville, IN 4 of 5Aspen Place Health CampusGreensburg, IN 4 of 5Avalon Springs Health CampusValparaiso, IN 4 of 5Bethany Pointe Health CampusAnderson, IN 4 of 5Blair Ridge Health CampusPeru, IN 4 of 5Bridgepointe Health CampusVincennes, IN 4 of 5Cedar Creek Health CampusLowell, IN 4 of 5Clearvista Lake Health CampusIndianapolis, IN 4 of 5Forest Springs Health CampusLouisville, KY 4 of 5Glen Oaks Health CampusNew Castle, IN 4 of 5Glen Ridge Health CampusLouisville, KY 4 of 5Meadows Of Delphos TheDelphos, OH 4 of 5Meadows Of Ottawa TheOttawa, OH

Showing 40 of 122; lowest-rated first.

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
GRIFFIN-AMERICAN HEALTHCARE REIT III, INC.Organization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 12/01/2015
GRIFFIN-AMERICAN HEALTHCARE REIT IV HOLDINGS, LPOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 12/01/2015
NORTHSTAR HEALTHCARE INCOME INCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 12/01/2015
NORTHSTAR HEALTHCARE INCOME OPERATING PARTNERSHIP LPOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 12/01/2015
TRILOGY HOLDINGS NT-HCI, LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 12/01/2015
CORBIN, KATHYIndividualW-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEEsince 10/01/2020
FIGHTMASTER, LISAIndividualW-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEEsince 12/01/2015
BARBER, ROBINIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 04/03/2018
BARNEY, LEIGHIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 01/01/2001
BRYANT, WILLIAMIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 01/05/2016
DAVIS, DAVIDIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 08/21/2017
PROSKY, DANNYIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 12/01/2015
STREIFF, MATHIEUIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 12/01/2015
WILLIAMSON, BRADLEYIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 01/21/2014
TRILOGY MANAGEMENT SERVICES LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 12/30/2015
HELZERMAN, ROBINIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 07/20/2020

6 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$8.8M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-7.6%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$1.2M
Related-party expense13% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 28%Medicare 12%Other / private 60%

This home reported $1.2M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 13% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$346per resident / day
operating cost
$10,522per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$322per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in OH

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Ohio Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Ohio
$9,186/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$10,389/mo
Nursing home (private)
$6,103/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 366480. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-04-28, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next