Avalon Springs Health Campus

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

63.0% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 396 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 89.7% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 234 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.65 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 90% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 10% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 61 beds and averages 57.0 residents a day — about 93% occupied, or roughly 4 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.52 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 1.06 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.83 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.03 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.72 on weekdays — 18% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.17 to 0.77 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 46% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

28 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 18 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-01-14 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure infection control measures were in place and implemented related to appropriate signage posted during a respiratory outbreak, lack of monitoring for a resident that was COVID-19 positive and lack of COVID-19 testing for a symptomatic resident for 2 of 3 residents reviewed for infection control and random infection control observations. (Residents 19 and 44)Findings include:1.On 1/8/26 at 8:35 a.m., the entrance to the facility was observed. There was no signage posted that indicated there was currently a respiratory outbreak in the facility and listed current precautions such as masking was optional or available. During the initial tour of the facility, there were resident rooms observed to have droplet precautions signs and PPE (personal protective equipment) bins outside the rooms. The staff indicated the residents on precautions had tested positive for COVID-19. The positive residents resided on the 100 and 300 halls. There was no signage that indicated those halls had a respiratory outbreak. During…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-01-14 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure complete and accurate information was included in Indiana Department of Health (IDOH) Reportable Incidents related to abuse allegations for 2 of 3 IDOH Reportable Incidents reviewed. (Residents 11 and 42)Findings include:1.During an interview on 1/9/26 at 11:07 a.m., Resident 11 indicated a staff member had been rude and mean to her. She indicated she did not recall who the staff member was but that she had reported it to another staff member. The resident's record was reviewed on 1/9/26 at 1:20 p.m. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, hemiplegia (one-sided paralysis) and hemiparesis (one-sided weakness) following a cerebral infarction and dysphagia. The Significant Change Minimum Data Set assessment, dated 1/3/26, indicated the resident had moderate cognitive impairment. An IDOH Reportable Incident, dated 9/26/25, indicated the resident's family had reported a concern with care. The resident was assessed and no injury was noted. An investigation was initiated. Other residents who resided on the same hall…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-14 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure fall interventions were in place for a resident with a history of falls for 1 of 1 residents reviewed for accidents. (Resident 6)Finding includes:On 1/9//26 at 9:40 a.m., Resident 6's room was observed. There was a standard size bed placed in the middle of the room with the headboard against the wall. On the right side of the bed, there was an oxygen concentrator between the bed and the wall. The resident was seated in a Broda chair near the nurse's station.The resident's record was reviewed on 1/9/26 at 9:26 a.m. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, traumatic subdural hematoma, acute and chronic respiratory failure and Alzheimer's dementia.The Significant Change Minimum Data Set assessment, dated 12/15/25, indicated the resident had severe cognitive deficits and was dependent for transfers and toileting.An Indiana Department of Health Reportable Incident, dated 11/3/25, indicated the resident had sustained a fall on 10/31/25 and had been sent to the hospital for evaluation. He sustained a…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-14 · tag F0694 — isolated
  Provide for the safe, appropriate administration of IV fluids for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC) intravenous (IV) access site was assessed and monitored accurately as ordered for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for parenteral/IV fluids. (Resident 41)Finding includes: Resident 41's record was reviewed on 1/14/26 at 12:36 a.m. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, osteomyelitis (infection of the bone) and cellulitis of the right and left lower limbs (skin infection). The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 12/17/25, indicated the resident was moderately cognitively impaired. He required intermittent oxygen therapy, received intravenous (IV) antibiotic medications, and had a central IV access site. A Care Plan, dated 12/15/25, indicated the resident required IV medications related to osteomyelitis. Interventions included, but were not limited to, assess for complications of the IV every shift such as infection or dislodgment, and IV site care as ordered. A Physician's Order, dated 12/12/25, indicated PICC line dressing change every 5 days; measure…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-14 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
  Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to document care for a PICC line (peripherally inserted central catheter, intravenous catheter placed into the peripheral veins of the upper arm) in accordance with professional standards of practice, related to flushing the PICC line for 2 of 3 residents reviewed for intravenous care. (Residents 14 and 59)Findings include:1. On 1/9/26 at 10:16 a.m. Resident 14 was observed with a PICC line to her right upper arm. She indicated she was receiving IV (intravenous) antibiotics.Resident 14's record was reviewed on 1/12/26 at 3:44 p.m. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, bacteremia and type two diabetes mellitus.The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 12/22/25, indicated the resident was cognitively intact.A Physician's Order, dated 12/16/25, indicated piperacillin-tazobactam (an antibiotic medication) 4.5 grams intravenous every eight hours at 8:00 a.m., 4:00 p.m., and 12:00 a.m.A Physician's Order, dated 1/7/26, indicated daptomycin (an antibiotic medication) 350 mg intravenous every 48…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-10-27 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident who required maximum to dependent care received incontinence care in a timely manner, for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for incontinence care. (Resident B) Finding includes:During an observation on 10/27/25 at 10:27 a.m., Resident B was awake and lying in bed with the head of the bed elevated. The over the bed table was over the bed and the breakfast tray was on the table. The food on the tray had all been eaten. The resident indicated she was waiting on the staff to come and assist out of bed into the chair. She indicated when they brought the breakfast tray to her, they said they would be back to help her get out of bed.During an observation on 10/27/25 at 11:12 a.m., CNA 1 and CNA 2 entered the room. CNA 1 indicated the resident had incontinence care last completed at 7:30 a.m. and the resident was incontinent of large amounts of urine. The CNA's started morning care. The resident's incontinent brief was saturated, the lift sheet underneath her was soaked through to the bottom sheet on the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-17 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure correct Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) was used by staff members (CNA 1 and CNA 2) when providing care to residents who were in EBP and failed to ensure a staff member (CNA 2) completed hand hygiene after the removal of soiled gloves for 2 of 3 residents reviewed for infection control. (Residents F and D)Findings include:1. During an observation on 9/16/25 at 9:24 a.m., CNA 1 entered Resident F's room and assisted the resident into the bathroom. There was a sign on the door of the room that indicated EBP was required. CNA 1 had gloves on and no gown. The Director of Nursing (DON) entered and exited the bathroom and observed CNA 1 providing care without the use of a protective gown. She indicated a protective gown should have been worn. CNA 1 exited the bathroom with a soiled brief in a clear garbage bag for disposal.During an observation on 9/17/25 at 8:23 a.m., Resident F was lying in bed. There was a mid-line IV catheter inserted and dressed on the upper left arm and a urinary catheter was…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-27 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure fall interventions were in place to prevent injury for a resident with multiple falls for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for accidents. (Resident C) Finding includes: On 2/27/25 at 10:06 a.m., Resident C was observed in bed asleep. The resident's bed was against the wall, he had bed rails, and there was a trapeze bar above the bed. The room was clean and clutter free and the call light was within reach. There were no bolsters observed on the resident's bed. On 2/27/25 at 10:25 a.m., and 1:10 p.m., the resident was observed sitting on the side of the bed. There were no bolsters on the bed. Record review for Resident C was completed on 2/27/25 at 10:36 a.m. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), stroke, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), depression, and diabetes. The Significant Change in Status Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 12/10/24, indicated the resident was cognitively impaired. The resident required substantial/maximum assistance with…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-11-26 · tag F0554 — isolated
  Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident had Physician's Order to self-administer their own medications for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for self-administration of medication. (Resident 38) Finding includes: During random observations on 11/21/24 at 10:20 a.m. and 2:04 p.m., and on 11/22/24 at 8:30 a.m., 10:21 a.m., and 1:24 p.m., Resident 38 was observed in bed. At those times, there was a bottle of nasal saline spray on her overbed table. On 11/22/24 at 2:45 p.m., LPN 1 was observed in the resident's room. At that time, she was made aware of the nasal saline spray on the overbed table. The record for Resident 38 was reviewed on 11/22/24 at 11:20 a.m. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, heart disease, congestive heart failure, acute pulmonary edema, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), and acute respiratory failure. The 9/17/24 Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment indicated the resident was moderately impaired for daily decision making. The resident had an unplanned significant weight loss and received a…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-26 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
  Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a physician was notified of abnormal vital signs for 1 of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. (Resident 5) Finding includes: The record for Resident 5 was reviewed on 11/22/24 at 2:17 p.m. The resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, heart failure, hypertensive heart disease and diabetes mellitus. The admission MDS assessment, dated 10/11/24, indicated the resident was cognitively intact and was dependent on staff for toileting and transfers. A Physician's Order, dated 10/8/24, indicated to give carvedilol (medication used to treat hypertension) 25 milligrams (mg) twice daily for hypertension. There were no blood pressure or heart rate parameters in place indicating when to hold the medication. The October 2024 Medication Administration Record (MAR) indicated the medication had been given twice daily from 10/8/24 through 10/15/24. The resident was sent to the hospital on [DATE],…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to TRILOGY HEALTH SERVICES — 123 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 52 rows in the source record cover these 34 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

22 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $1.9M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 15% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in IN