Cedar Creek Health Campus

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

58.6% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 150 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 85.3% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 129 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.52 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 82% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 13% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 58 beds and averages 54.9 residents a day — about 95% occupied, or roughly 3 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.58 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.90 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.71 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.05 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.79 on weekdays — 20% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.93 to 0.81 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 27% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

25 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 14 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2024-06-05 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure adequate supervision was provided to a cognitively impaired resident with a history of exit seeking and failed to ensure an alarmed door was effectively secured to prevent elopement for 1 of 6 residents reviewed for elopement risk. (Resident M) This deficient practice resulted in Resident M exiting the facility and being picked up by a stranger who activated 911. The immediate jeopardy began on 5/25/24 when a cognitively impaired male resident, with a history of exit seeking and a Wanderguard (door alarm bracelet used to monitor residents who wander) in place, exited the facility without staff knowledge and ambulated 0.3 miles away from the facility. The resident was absent from the facility for approximately 35 minutes, had just been medicated with an as needed anti-anxiety medication (Xanax), and was also at risk for falls. The Administrator, Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON), RN Clinical Support Nurse, and the Area Executive Director were…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Potential for harm · D2026-05-18 · tag F0641 — isolated
  Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the Minimum Data Set (MDS) comprehensive assessment was accurately completed related to insulin for 1 of 16 MDS assessments reviewed. (Resident 15)Finding includes:Record review for Resident 15 was completed on 5/12/26 at 3:16 p.m. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, type 2 diabetes mellitus.The admission MDS assessment, dated 3/17/26, indicated the resident had received an insulin injection in the past seven days.The Medication Administration Record, dated 3/2026, lacked documentation of any insulin administration.The Physician's Order Summary, dated 5/2026, lacked any orders for insulin.During an interview on 5/13/26 at 3:05 p.m., the MDS Coordinator indicated the resident had not received any insulin and it had been marked by accident.410 IAC (Indiana Administrative Code) 16.2-3.1-31(i)

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-05-18 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure care plans were implemented and in place for antibiotic medication use for 1 of 16 resident care plans reviewed. (Resident 3)Finding includes:During an interview on 5/12/26 at 11:00 a.m., Resident 3's family member indicated the resident was taking antibiotics routinely due to a history of urinary tract infections in the past.Resident 3's record was reviewed on 5/12/26 at 1:26 p.m. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, dementia with behavioral disturbance and urinary tract infection.The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 3/4/26, indicated the resident was severely cognitively impaired, she was frequently incontinent of bowel and bladder, and received antibiotic medications.A Physician's Order, dated 1/22/26, indicated Macrobid (antibiotic medication) 100 milligrams, 1 capsule daily.A Physician's Progress Note, dated 1/22/26 at 12:02 p.m., indicated the resident was seen for a follow-up per the family's request for a lump on the resident's right knee with pain and for concerns of a urinary…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-18 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents received the necessary treatment and services related to skin discolorations not assessed and or monitored for 2 of 3 residents reviewed for non-pressure related skin conditions. (Residents 4 and 35)Findings include:1. On 5/11/26 at 10:19 a.m., Resident 4 was observed sitting in a wheelchair in her room. The resident had a raised blue discoloration on her right forearm and a purple discoloration on her left shin. The resident indicated she was unsure how she received the discolorations. Record review for Resident 4 was completed on 5/12/26 at 1:29 p.m. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, atrial fibrillation, stroke, and heart failure. A Care Plan, dated 4/30/26, indicated the resident was at risk for excessive bleeding and bruising related to medications. An intervention included to notify the physician of abnormal bruising.The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 5/4/26, indicated the resident was moderately cognitively impaired. The resident had a functional…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-18 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
  Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents received the necessary care and treatment related to a lack of a Physician's Order for oxygen use for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for respiratory care. (Resident 4)Finding includes:On 5/11/26 at 10:19 a.m., Resident 4 was observed sitting in a wheelchair in her room. The resident had a portable oxygen concentrator hooked to the back of her wheelchair. The oxygen was on the resident via a nasal canula at 2 liters. The resident indicated she had been on oxygen for a while. Record review for Resident 4 was completed on 5/12/26 at 1:29 p.m. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and respiratory failure. A Care Plan, dated 4/30/26, indicated the resident had potential for shortness of breath while lying flat related to COPD. An intervention included to administer oxygen per the Physician's Order.The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 5/4/26, indicated the resident was moderately cognitively impaired. The resident had a functional…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-18 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure infection control practices were in place and implemented related to Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) and staff not wearing a gown during a peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC) medication administration observation. (Resident 22) Finding includes:During a medication administration observation on 5/14/26 at 12:54 p.m., LPN 1 was observed preparing Resident 22's medications, which included antibiotic medication to be administered intravenously through the resident's PICC line. The resident's doorway had a sign that indicated EBP was to be used. LPN 1 entered the resident's room, used hand sanitizer, and donned gloves. He had not donned a gown. He then proceeded to administer the intravenous medication through the PICC line. During an interview on 5/14/26 at 1:07 p.m., LPN 1 indicated he had not been instructed to wear a gown when administering intravenous medication through a PICC line. He was unsure if the resident had an EBP sign posted outside his door.During an interview on 5/15/26 at 8:52…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-05-18 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — isolated
  Make sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a call light was working for a dependent resident for 1 of 24 resident's call lights tested. (Resident 4)Finding includes:On 5/11/26 at 10:19 a.m., Resident 4 was observed sitting in a wheelchair in her room. The resident indicated she wanted to lie down. She had pushed the button on her call light, but no one had responded. The resident pushed the button again; there was no light that illuminated from the call system in the hallway. On 5/11/26 at 10:21 a.m., LPN 1 was notified the resident's call light was not working. She then proceeded into the resident's room and pushed the button on the call light. There was no light that illuminated from the call system in the hallway. She indicated she would inform maintenance to fix the call light and would get another staff member to help her lie down.Record review for Resident 4 was completed on 5/12/26 at 1:29 p.m. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, stroke and hemiplegia (paralysis on one side of the body).The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS)…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-06-12 · tag F0808 — failed to follow doctor-ordered diets — isolated
  Ensure therapeutic diets are prescribed by the attending physician and may be delegated to a registered or licensed dietitian, to the extent allowed by State law.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents were served a therapeutic diet as ordered the physician for 2 of 3 residents reviewed for therapeutic diets. (Residents D and E) Findings include: 1. During an observation on 6/11/25 at 9:12 a.m., Resident D's breakfast meal consisted of two fried eggs, bacon, apple juice, [NAME] toast and fruit. The meal card indicated a regular diet with fortified foods was to be served. During an observation on 6/11/25 at 11:49 a.m., Resident D's lunch meal consisted of a slice of cheese pizza and a drink. At 12:17 p.m., she received a desert of cherry crisp. Resident D's record was reviewed on 6/11/25 at 4:29 p.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, vascular dementia. A Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 3/20/25, indicated a severely impaired cognitive status, required supervision while eating, and received a therapeutic diet. A Care Plan, revised on 6/3/25, indicated the resident was at risk for…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-03-24 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a concern related to missing clothing was documented and investigated for 1 of 1 residents reviewed for grievances. (Resident 6) Finding includes: During an interview on 3/17/25 at 1:28 p.m., Resident 6 indicated she had been missing a baseball sweatshirt for a couple of months and it had never been replaced. She also indicated she had been missing a blue and white nightgown, for approximately the past two weeks, that had not been found or replaced. The resident's record was reviewed on 3/19/25 at 1:20 p.m. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, hypotension and muscle weakness. The Quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment for Resident 6, dated 3/14/25, indicated the resident was cognitively intact and needed substantial assistance for bed mobility and transfers. Resident grievances for the past six months were reviewed. There were no grievances from Resident 6 related to missing clothing. During an interview on 3/19/25 at 11:23 a.m., the Director of Nursing indicated she was…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-24 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure medications were administered and/or held per blood pressure parameters for 1 of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. (Resident 31) Finding includes: Resident 31's record was reviewed on 3/18/25 at 1:52 p.m. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, Parkinson's disease, chronic kidney disease, and congestive heart failure. The Significant Change in Status Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 1/20/25, indicated the resident was moderately cognitively impaired for daily decision making. The current March 2025 Physician Order Summary (POS) indicated the resident was to receive propranolol (high blood pressure treatment) 40 milligrams 1 tablet, hold if heart rate was less than 60 beats per minute and/or systolic blood pressure (top number of blood pressure reading) was less than 120 and hydrochlorothiazide (a diuretic medication) 25 milligrams 1 tablet, hold if systolic blood pressure is less than 120. The February and March 2025 Medication Administration Record (MAR) indicated the propranolol was…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-24 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure safety measures were implemented related to a broken wheelchair brake and fall interventions were put into place as ordered for 2 of 4 residents reviewed for falls. (Residents 48 and 55) Findings include: 1. On 3/17/25 at 11:28 a.m., Resident 48 was observed in her room. She indicated she had fallen in the bathroom because her wheelchair was unstable and one of the locks did not work. She indicated she had reported the issue to several people. The wheelchair was present and the right brake was noted to be broken and did not work. Resident 48's record was reviewed on 3/18/25 at 11:10 a.m. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, chronic bronchitis, heart failure, anemia and atrial fibrillation. The admission Minimum Data Set assessment, dated 2/20/25, indicated the resident was cognitively intact and required substantial assistance for bed mobility and transfers. A Nursing Progress Note, dated 3/13/25, indicated the resident was being transferred from the toilet to the locked wheelchair when she slid…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$8,021 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $8,021 — penalty dated 2024-05-28

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to TRILOGY HEALTH SERVICES — 123 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 37 rows in the source record cover these 27 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

15 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $1.4M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 15% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in IN