St Mary Healthcare Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

48.6% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 52 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 68.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 25 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.23 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 29% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 18% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 79 beds and averages 65.6 residents a day — about 83% occupied, or roughly 13 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.47 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.63 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.57 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.97 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.67 on weekdays — 19% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.68 to 0.50 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 29% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

20 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 10 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · F2026-03-31 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the food preparation area did not contain employee drinks and frozen food was sealed in 1 of 1 kitchen reviewed. This deficient practice had the potential to affect 65 of 65 residents who received food from the kitchen.Findings include:During the kitchen observation, on 3/24/26 at 9:36 a.m., with the Dietary Manager, the following were observed:a. The food preparation counter had two unopened cans of energy drinks and a white cup with a lid and straw stored next to a jar of peanut butter and loaf of bread.b. On the second shelf in the walk-in freezer, there was a large opened plastic bag containing one skinless chicken breast. The chicken breast had a small amount of ice buildup on the upper left corner.c. On the second shelf in the walk-in freezer, there was a large cardboard box of skinless chicken breasts. The chicken was left in an untied plastic bag, and the cardboard lid was left wide open. During an interview, on 3/24/26 at 9:45 a.m., the Dietary Manager indicated the drinks belonged to the staff…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-31 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a physician's orders were followed, a medication was administered according to the ordered parameters, and to obtain an admission weight for 3 of 3 residents reviewed for quality of care. (Resident 6, 17 and 44)Findings Include: 1. The clinical record for Resident 6 was reviewed on 3/25/26 at 10:59 a.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, hypotension, vitamin deficiency, acute kidney failure, and iron deficiency anemia.A care plan, dated 3/19/26, indicated the resident had a potential for cardiovascular distress related to the diagnosis of hypotension. Interventions included, but were not limited to, administer medications as ordered. A physician's order, dated 3/11/26, indicated to administer midodrine (a medication for low blood pressure) 5 milligrams (mg), four times a day, and to hold the medication for a systolic blood pressure greater than 110. A medication administration record (MAR), dated 3/11/26 through 3/25/26, indicated…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-08-22 · tag F0628 — isolated
  Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident's discharge paperwork provided to the receiving facility was accurate for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for discharge. (Resident C)Findings include: During an interview, on 8/20/25 at 2:09 p.m., an anonymous interviewee indicated Resident C was transferred, on 7/31/25, to their group home. She indicated Resident C came with discharge paperwork. The discharge assessment indicated Resident C required assistance with eating, hygiene, toileting, showers, lower body dressing, and putting on and taking off footwear. She indicated Resident C was independent and did not need assistance.The clinical record for Resident C was reviewed on 8/20/25 at 3:55 p.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, asthma, tracheostomy status, and congenital malformation of the musculoskeletal system.The clinical record indicated Resident C was cognitively intact and was capable of making her own decisions.A nursing progress note, dated 7/29/25 at 12:23 p.m., indicated the resident's discharge plan was to discharge to a group…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-05-19 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were served their meals together, staff were seated while eating with the residents, and a resident was able to complete their meal before being removed from the dining room for 1 of 2 dining rooms reviewed for dignity. (the legacy dining room) Findings include: 1. During an observation, on 5/14/25 at 12:00 p.m., the residents were seated in the legacy dining room. CNA 15 took a resident's meal ticket, gave the ticket to Dining Assistant 12, and he prepared the resident's plate. The CNAs passed out plates to residents seated at different tables randomly until all residents were served. During an interview, on 5/14/25 at 11:54 a.m., CNA 11 indicated Dining Assistant 12 told her to take a resident's meal ticket and pass the food out in the order of the tickets. CNA 11 told Dining Assistant 12 they should serve one table at a time. During an interview, on 5/14/25 at 12:12 p.m., Activity Associate 13 indicated normally the trays were passed out one table at a time until all the residents had…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-05-19 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a do not resuscitate (DNR) order was updated when received for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for advanced directives. (Resident 21) The deficient practice was corrected on 4/28/25, prior to the start of the survey, and therefore was past noncompliance. Findings include: The clinical record for Resident 21 was reviewed on 5/16/25 at 11:34 a.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, adult failure to thrive, heart failure, coronary artery disease, hypertension, Parkinson's disease, type 2 diabetes, obesity, schizophrenia, iron deficiency anemia, and hypothyroidism. A physician's order dated 3/25/25 indicated full code status. A State of Indiana Out of Hospital Do Not Resuscitate Declaration and Order form indicated the resident was to be a DNR. The form was signed by the resident representative and witness on 4/1/25. The form was signed by the physician on 4/14/25. A physician's order, dated 4/22/25, indicated DNR code status. During an interview, on 5/19/25 at 10:19 a.m., LPN 10 indicated that when she received a…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Potential for harm · D2025-05-19 · tag F0582 — isolated
  Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the residents were issued SNF ABN's (Skilled Nursing Facility Advance Beneficiary Notice of Non-coverage) for 2 of 3 residents reviewed for beneficiary notification. (Resident 1 and 20) The deficient practice was corrected on 2/13/25, prior to the start of the survey, and therefore was past noncompliance. Findings include: 1. Resident 1 started on Medicare Part A services on 11/3/24. The facility initiated the discharge from Medicare Part A services when benefit days were not exhausted. The last covered day of Part A Service was 12/13/24. There was no SNF ABN or NOMNC provided to Resident 1. 2. Resident 20 started on Medicare Part A services on 10/22/24. The facility initiated the discharge from Medicare Part A services when benefit days were not exhausted. The last covered day of Part A Service was 12/23/24. There was no SNF ABN or NOMNC provided to Resident 20. During an interview, on 5/15/25 at 11:22 a.m., the DON (Director of Nursing) indicated the beneficiary notices were not being completed prior to February…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Potential for harm · D2025-05-19 · tag F0641 — isolated
  Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment was correctly coded for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for resident assessments. (Resident 49) Findings include: The clinical record for Resident 49 was reviewed on 5/14/25 at 3:56 p.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, and cognitive communication deficit. A Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR), dated 12/18/24, indicated the resident did not have any known recent or current mental health conditions. An admission minimum data set (MDS) assessment, dated 12/24/24, indicated the resident did not have a diagnosis of schizophrenia. A resident information sheet, last reviewed by the physician on 3/13/25, indicated the resident had a diagnosis of schizophrenia and bipolar disorder. A significant change in status MDS assessment, dated 3/26/25, indicated Resident 49 had a diagnosis of schizophrenia. Resident 49's physician's orders did not include any antipsychotic medications for the treatment of schizophrenia or bipolar disorder.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-19 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure vital signs and neurological assessments were documented for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for assessments. (Resident 70) The deficient practice was corrected on 5/10/25, prior to the start of the survey, and therefore was past noncompliance. Findings include: The clinical record for Resident 70 was reviewed on 5/15/25 at 1:37 p.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, hypertension, chronic kidney disease, type 2 diabetes mellitus, and retention of urine, A facility event and incident report, dated 12/13/24 at 6:41 p.m., indicated the resident had an unwitnessed fall. The report did not include documentation for the 72-hour follow-up vital signs or neurological assessments. A facility event and incident report, dated 4/1/25 at 10:20 a.m., indicated the resident had an unwitnessed fall. The report did not include documentation for the 72-hour follow-up vital signs or neurological assessments. During an interview, on 5/15/25 at 9:48 a.m., the Director of Nursing (DON) indicated neurological assessments were not…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Potential for harm · D2025-05-19 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
  Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident's diagnoses in the medical record were accurate and correct for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for documentation. (Residents 49) Findings include: The clinical record for Resident 49 was reviewed on 5/14/25 at 3:56 p.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, and cognitive communication deficit. A facility resident information sheet, last reviewed by the physician on 3/13/25, indicated the resident had a diagnosis of schizophrenia and bipolar disorder. The physician's orders did not include any antipsychotic medications for the treatment of schizophrenia or bipolar disorder. During an interview, on 5/16/25 at 2:00 p.m., the Director of Nursing (DON) indicated Resident 49 did not have schizophrenia or a bipolar diagnosis. During an interview, on 5/19/25 at 11:09 a.m., the DON indicated the incorrect diagnoses were incorrect and should not have been listed on the diagnoses list. Upon exit, the facility was unable to provide an accurate records policy. 3.1-50(a)(2)

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-05-19 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the policy and procedure related to administering two (2) step Mantoux skin tests for tuberculosis were followed for 4 of 5 employees reviewed for infection control. (QMA 6, QMA 7, CNA 8 and CNA 9) Findings include: 1. A facility tuberculin testing for employees' form, dated 9/25/24, indicated QMA 6 was given the first step tuberculosis (TB) test on 9/25/24 and was read on 9/28/24. The second step was given on 10/10/24 and read on 10/12/24. There was no documentation indicating the time the first and second step tests were read. 2. A facility tuberculin testing for employees' form, dated 8/14/24, indicated QMA 7 was given the first step TB test on 8/14/24 and was read on 8/16/24. The second step was given on 8/30/24 and read on 9/1/24. There was no documentation indicating the time the first and second step test was read. 3. A facility tuberculin testing for employees' form, dated 1/19/25, indicated CNA 8 was given the first step TB test on 1/19/25 and was read on 1/21/25. The second step was given on 2/1/25 and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to TRILOGY HEALTH SERVICES — 123 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 35 rows in the source record cover these 32 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

19 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $904K paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 12% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in IN