Ashford Place Health Campus

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

62.3% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 181 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 85.9% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 92 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.53 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 84% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 2% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 68 beds and averages 55.8 residents a day — about 82% occupied, or roughly 12 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.72 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.56 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.04 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.45 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.83 on weekdays — 10% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.64 to 0.38 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 22% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

26 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 14 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · J2023-01-11 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to protect the residents' right to be free from sexual abuse by not appropriately determining their capacity to consent to sexual interactions and implementing an effective plan to address the sexual activity between 2 residents for 2 of 2 resident's reviewed for abuse. (Resident 14 and Resident 28). The Immediate Jeopardy started on 5/5/22 when two cognitively impaired residents engaged in a sexual activity. Resident 14 and 28 continued to have sexual encounters after the 5/5/22 incident; resulting in increased falls, initiation of a prophylactic antibiotic, increase in antidepressant medication, initiation of a medication used to suppress sexual desire and emotional distress. The facility was unable to provide evidence an effective plan was in place to address the residents' sexual interactions and determining if Residents 28 and 14 had the mental capacity to consent to sexual activities. The Executive Director (ED), Director of Nursing Services (DNS),…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Actual harm · Gcited before2024-08-14 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure interventions to prevent falls were effectively implemented when Resident C exhibited signs and symptoms of lethargy, drowsiness, and sedation and failed to ensure staff used a gait belt during the transfer of a Resident D who required more than limited assistance with transfers for 2 of 3 residents reviewed for falls. This deficient practice resulted in Resident C falling in the shower and sustaining fractures to the left shoulder blade, the left second rib, and the endplate of the third lumbar spinal disc. (Resident C and Resident D) Findings include: 1. The clinical record for Resident C was reviewed on 8/14/24 at 8:30 a.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, dementia, osteoporosis, and insomnia. A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 5/2/24, indicated Resident C was cognitively impaired. The resident's functional status was dependent of the staff person to provide all the effort for the resident to bathe. The staff was to provide more than half of the effort to assist with transferring…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-13 · tag F0641 — isolated
  Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the accuracy of a Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for alarm use for 2 of 2 residents reviewed for falls. (Resident 17 and Resident 25)Findings include: 1. The clinical record for Resident 17 was reviewed on 8/11/25 at 11:30 a.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, dementia. A fall care plan, dated 1/16/24, indicated Resident (17) is at risk for falling r/t [related to] decreased mobility, medication regimen, weakness, incontinent status and other comorbidities. The interventions included but were not limited to: the resident's usage of a clip alarm when in wc/chair [wheelchair] with a start date of 3/6/25, and usage of a floor mat alarm when in recliner with a start date of 11/14/24. A physician's order, dated 3/5/25, indicated Resident 17 was to wear a personal pull tab alarm while in the wheelchair every shift. A physician's order, dated 5/21/25, indicated Resident 17 was to have a floor mat alarm in place every shift. The 7/7/25 Quarterly MDS assessment for Resident 17 indicated the resident did…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-08-13 · tag F0644 — isolated
  Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to timely refer a resident for a level II evaluation for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR). (Resident 19)Findings include: The clinical record for Resident 19 was reviewed on 8/8/25 at 3:17 p.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, diabetes and psychotic disorder with delusions. A PASRR Level I evaluation, dated 8/10/23, indicated Resident 19 was approved with no Level II required. On 6/1/24, Resident 19 received a new diagnosis of psychotic disorder with delusions. During an interview on 8/8/25 at 2:59 p.m., the Executive Director (ED) indicated Resident 19 did not have a Level II. During an interview on 8/11/25 at 2:35 p.m., the Social Services Director (SSD) indicated Resident 19 should have been referred for a Level II with the new diagnosis of psychosis. On 8/11/25 at 11:29 a.m., the Nurse Consultant (NC) provided the current Indiana PASRR Standard Operating Procedure, which indicated .Overview Preadmission Screening and Resident Review [PASRR] is a federal…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-13 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure an insulin flex pen was primed prior to dialing up the dosage to be given when administering insulin per the manufacture directions for 1 of 2 residents observed during insulin administration. (Resident 8)Findings include: The clinical record for Resident 8 was reviewed on 8/8/25 at 2:00 p.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, type 2 diabetes mellitus.A diabetic care plan, dated 7/1/25, indicated the staff was to administer the medication as ordered. A physician's order, dated 6/16/25, indicated Resident 8 was to receive 10 units of lispro insulin (fast acting insulin) with a flex pen before meals. An observation was conducted of an insulin administration for Resident 8 with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) 3 on 8/8/25 at 11:03 a.m. LPN 3 was observed obtaining the resident's blood sugar reading of 273. After, she prepared to administer 10 units of lispro insulin using an insulin flex pen. During that time, LPN 3 wiped the flex pen with an alcohol wipe and placed the needle on the pen. She…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-13 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a gait belt was used during the manual transfer of a resident and to ensure an evaluation was conducted timely for the usage of personal alarms for 2 of 2 residents reviewed for accidents. (Resident 17 and Resident 25) Findings include: 1a. The clinical record for Resident 25 was reviewed on 8/8/25 at 10:40 a.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, Parkinson's disease and traumatic brain injury. A physician's order, dated 3/23/25, indicated he was to have a pressure alarm in his wheelchair at all times. This order was discontinued on 5/23/25. A physician's order, dated 5/23/25, indicated he was to have a pressure alarm to his wheelchair and recliner when he was present. This order was discontinued on 6/10/25. A physician's order, dated 6/10/25, indicated that he was to have a pressure alarm at all times, ensure pressure alarm was moved from wheelchair to recliner and bed with him. A Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, completed 7/9/25, indicated he was dependent on staff for chair…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-13 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure infection control was maintained by not disinfecting a glucometer (a device used to obtain blood sugar readings) per the manufacturer's instructions for 1 of 2 residents observed during medication administrations of blood sugar readings. (Resident 43)Findings include: The clinical record for Resident 43 was reviewed on 8/8/25 at 2:30 p.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, type 2 diabetes mellitus.A physician's order, dated 7/22/25, indicated Resident 43 was to receive nine units of Novolog (fast acting) insulin before meals. If the resident's blood sugar reading was less than 100; hold the insulin. An observation was conducted of obtaining Resident 43's blood sugar reading with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) 3 on 8/8/25 at 11:17 a.m. LPN 3 was observed removing the glucometer from the medication cart. She then wiped the glucometer utilizing an alcohol wipe. She then went to the resident's room. LPN 3 was observed pricking the resident's finger, placing a drop of blood from the resident's…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-04 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide bathing, as scheduled, to 1 of 3 residents reviewed for bathing. (Resident D) Findings include: The clinical record for Resident D was reviewed on 4/4/25 at 10:49 a.m. Her diagnoses included, but were not limited to, depression and diabetes. She was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and discharged on 3/29/25. The 3/21/25 admission MDS (Minimum Data Set) assessment indicated she required substantial, maximal assistance for bathing and was cognitively intact. The 3/18/25 ADL (activities of daily living) care plan indicated she required staff assistance to complete self-care and mobility functional tasks completely and safely. The goal was for her to have her functional needs met safely by staff. An approach was for showers on Wednesdays and Saturdays on the evening shift. A telephone interview was conducted with Resident D on 4/4/25 at 12:38 p.m. She indicated she did not receive baths or showers in the facility twice a week. The first time she…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-05-01 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to timely address a grievance for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for dignity (Resident B). Findings include: The clinical record for Resident B was reviewed on 4/25/24 at 12:03 p.m. The Resident's diagnosis included, but were not limited to, hypertension. A Quarterly MDS (Minimum Data Set) Assessment, completed 2/5/24, indicated she was cognitively intact, frequently incontinent of bowel and bladder, and needed maximal assistance of staff for toileting. During an interview on 4/25/24 at 12:03 p.m., FM (Family Member) 20 indicated that approximately a week and a half ago, they had filed a grievance because Resident B had been brought to an appointment on the facility bus after being incontinent of bowel. The facility bus driver had gone back to the facility to get new clothing so that FM 20 could clean Resident B before the appointment. FM 20 was concerned that Resident B had not been toileted prior to leaving the facility. During an interview on 4/30/24 at 2:39 p.m., AS (Activity Assistant) 12 indicated that she had been the bus…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-05-01 · tag F0622 — isolated
  Not transfer or discharge a resident without an adequate reason; and must provide documentation and convey specific information when a resident is transferred or discharged.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the required medical and contact information was sent to the hospital for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for discharge. (Resident 54) Findings include: The clinical record for Resident 54 was reviewed on 4/29/24 at 10:28 a.m. Her diagnoses included, but were not limited to, stage 4 chronic kidney disease and stage 4 pressure ulcer of the sacral region. She was discharged from the facility to the hospital on 1/27/24. The 1/27/24, 10:06 p.m. nurse's note read, Res [Resident] has no output in catheter and was flushed x [times] 2. IV [Intravenous] 1L [liter] finished this morning and has drank fluids this shift. Per [name of physician] and spouse send to ed [emergency department] for eval [evaluation.] The 1/28/24 Clinical Discharge Observation, recorded and completed on 2/2/24, indicated a paper-based reconciled medication list was sent to the hospital with Resident 54. There was no information in the clinical record to indicate the contact information of the practitioner responsible for the care of Resident 54, Resident…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-01 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
  Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to timely revise a resident's care plans for refusal of showers and depression with individualized interventions for 1 of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications (Resident 20). Findings include: The clinical record for Resident 20 was reviewed on 4/26/24 at 9:18 a.m. The Resident's diagnosis included, but were not limited to, depression and anxiety. A care plan, with a start date of 5/5/22 and last reviewed 4/17/24, indicated Resident 20 demonstrates symptoms of depression as evidenced by a score of on the PHQ-9 (depression assessment) sadness and tearfulness. The goal was that the resident will not demonstrate an increase in depressive symptoms. The approaches were GDR (Gradual Dose Reduction) of anti-depressant 4/3/24. Inform psych of an adverse effects noted or any changes in mood/ behavior, initiated 4/8/24, anti-depressant increased 2/5/24 due to failed GDR. Inform psych of any changes in mood/ behavior, initiated 2/5/24, anti-depressant decreased per GDR on 10/20/23 per psych, initiated 10/23/23,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-05-01 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
  Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to administer a resident's medication, as ordered, and to timely address an issue with a physician's order for a new eye medication for a resident whose insurance did not cover the costs of the medication for 2 of 3 residents reviewed for pharmacy services and medication administration. (Resident E and Resident 16) Findings include: 1. The clinical record for Resident E was reviewed on 4/25/24 at 11:55 a.m. Her diagnoses included but were not limited to, type 2 diabetes mellitus and metastatic bone cancer. She was admitted to the facility from the hospital on 4/19/24. An interview was conducted with Resident E on 4/25/24 at 12:00 p.m. She indicated she was discharged from the hospital on a whole list of medications. Because she was admitted to the facility on a Friday, she did not start getting some of the medications until the following Monday. The 4/19/24 hospital discharge medication list indicated to administer one 75 mg capsule of Glucofunction twice daily and one 950 mg Nutrient capsule twice daily. The…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to TRILOGY HEALTH SERVICES — 123 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 43 rows in the source record cover these 32 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

20 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $1.5M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 15% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in IN