Woodmont Health Campus

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

60.5% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 99 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 64.5% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 62 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.39 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 66% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 9% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 60 beds and averages 51.6 residents a day — about 86% occupied, or roughly 8 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.11 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.59 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.84 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.74 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.26 on weekdays — 16% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.66 to 0.39 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 49% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

29 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 19 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · D2026-06-11 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolated
  Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident's right to privacy for 1 of 3 resident's reviewed for resident rights. An employee took an unauthorized video of a cognitively impaired resident with a personal cell phone. (Resident C) This deficient practice was corrected on May 11, 2026, prior to the start of the survey, and was therefore past noncompliance.Finding includes:Review of facility reported incidents on 6/11/26 at 10:30 A.M., a reported incident dated 5/5/26 at 5:03 P.M. indicated CNA 4 was taking a video in the hallway of Resident C. The video was approximately five seconds long and was taken on the employee's personal cell phone. Review of Resident C's clinical record indicated the resident's diagnoses included but were not limited to cognitive communication deficit, abnormal posture, abnormalities of gait and mobility, lack of coordination, and major depression. The most recent annual Minimal Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicted the resident had severe cognitive…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Potential for harm · D2026-03-13 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
  Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure pharmaceutical services were available to provide physician prescribed routine medications to 2 of 3 residents reviewed for pharmacy services. Physician prescribed routine medications were not administered due to the medications being unavailable at the facility. (Resident B, Resident C)Findings include:1. During an interview on 3/13/26 at 10:35 A.M., Resident B indicated that staff had informed her on more than one occasion that they were out of her routine medications. During record review on 1/9/25 at 11:20 A.M., Resident B's diagnoses included but were not limited to, heart failure, kidney failure, type II diabetes, anemia, Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome (SIRS), and acute upper respiratory infection. Resident B's physician orders included, but were not limited to:- Carboxymethylcellulos sodium 0.5% (artificial tears), administer one drop in each eye three times a day, started 2/23/26.- Ferrous sulfate (iron supplement) 325 milligrams (mg) once a day, started 12/31/25.- Insulin Lispro pen (fast acting…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-03-13 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
  Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were free of significant medications errors for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for pharmacy services. A resident received a double dose of insulin and received another resident's medications. (Resident C) Finding includes:During record review on 3/13/26 at 11:00 A.M., Resident C's diagnoses included, but were not limited to, type II diabetes, heart failure, kidney failure, anxiety, and depression. Resident C's most recent annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 2/2/26, indicated the resident had no cognitive impairment and received insulin, antidepressant, diuretic, anticoagulant, hypoglycemic, and anticonvulsant medications during a seven day look back period. Resident C's nurses progress notes included but were not limited to:12/1/25 at 3:25 P.M. - Time of occurrence: 11/30/25 at 12:30 P.M. - Medication Error. Resident was given insulin twice by two different nurses. Resident received Novolog 10 units twice due to it was not clicked off on the Medication Administration Record (MAR) and nurse was…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-09-02 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the failed the obtain the temperature of the food prior to serving the residents for 1 of 1 plating observations. Finding includes:During an observation of plating on 8/28/25 at 6:02 A.M., [NAME] 17 utilized tongs and scoops to place the food items on the plates to serve the residents.During an interview on 8/28/25 at 6:06 A.M., [NAME] 19 indicated a computerized system was used to log the temperatures of the food items. At that time, she pulled up the temperature log on the computerized system, and the log was blank. [NAME] 17 continued plating and indicated temperatures should have been obtained by [NAME] 21. At that time, [NAME] 21 indicated the Dietary Manager should be in the facility at any time, and refused to answer on if the temperature of the food was obtained.On 6/28/25 at 6:09 A.M., the Dietary Manager entered the kitchen and looked on the computerized system to find the temperature log. At that time, he talked to [NAME] 21, and then indicated that [NAME] 17 had to stop plating food, and he began to take the temperature…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-02 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to clarify a Resident's code status for 1 of 1 residents reviewed for advanced directives. A resident's current Physician's Order did not match the signed Indiana Physician Orders for Scope of Treatment form, and staff was unaware of Resident's wishes. (Resident 56)Finding includes:On 8/29/25 at 11:17 A.M., Resident 56's daughter visited while Resident 56 was asleep in bed. At that time, the daughter indicated Resident 56 did not want to be intubated.On 8/27/25 at 10:16 A.M., Resident 56's clinical record was reviewed. Diagnosis included, but were not limited to, metastatic stage 4 cancer.Resident 56's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment was in progress and had not been completed.Physician Orders included, but were not limited to the following: CODE STATUS: No chest compressions. May intubate, dated 8/22/25A current POST form indicated, Limited Additional Interventions.Do not intubate, signed 8/22/25Resident 56's clinical record lacked a care plan related to code status.During an interview on 8/29/25 at 11:19 A.M.,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-02 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
  Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation. interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the comprehensive care plan was reviewed and revised for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for urinary tract infections (UTI), 1 of 3 residents reviewed for pressure ulcers, and 2 of 5 reviewed for unnecessary medications. Residents who were not on antianxiety medication and no longer had a UTI had care plans that were not removed and a resident with multiple pressure ulcers did not have wound specific care plans. (Resident 6, Resident 18, Resident 45, Resident 1)Findings include:1. On 8/27/25 at 8:04 A.M., Resident 6's clinical record was reviewed. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, severe dementia with psychotic disturbance and adjustment disorder. The most recent quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 8/7/25, indicated Resident 6's cognition was severely impaired and she was taking an antipsychotic, antidepressant, diuretic and opioid medication. Current Physician's Orders lacked an order for an antianxiety…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-09-02 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
  Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure services provided by the facility met professional standards of quality for 2 of 3 residents reviewed for nutrition and 1 of 4 residents reviewed for urinary tract infections (UTI) and pressure ulcers. Weights were not monitored and discontinuation of contact precautions were not completed as ordered, a dressing was not initialed or dated, staff documented treatments completed on a pressure ulcer that had been healed, and a nurse signed off on a treatment that another staff member completed. (Resident 45, Resident 1, Resident 8)Findings include: 1. On 8/27/25 at 12:45 P.M., Resident 8's clinical record was reviewed. Diagnoses included, but was not limited to, diabetes mellitus type II, chronic kidney disease (CKD), hypertension, lymphedema, edema, obesity (morbid), and dementia with psychotic disturbance. The most recent quarterly MDS assessment, dated 5/16/25, indicated Resident 8's cognition was moderately impaired, was 232 pounds (lbs), 5 foot 6 inches tall, no known weight loss or gain, and was totally dependent…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-09-02 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident received ordered treatment and services to promote healing and prevent new ulcers from developing for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. A wound specific care plan was not developed, treatment orders were not followed, wound assessments were not completed accurately, and Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) were not used when providing wound care. (Resident 6)Finding includes:On 8/27/25 at 8:04 A.M., Resident 6's clinical record was reviewed. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, severe dementia with psychotic disturbance and pressure ulcer.The most recent quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 8/7/25, indicated Resident 6's cognition was severely impaired, was dependent on staff assistance for toileting, substantial to maximum assistance (staff performs over half the effort) for bed mobility and transferring, and had one facility-acquired unstageable pressure ulcer. Current physician's orders included, but were not limited to, the following:EBP with wound care,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-02 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide adequate supervision and prevent falls for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for accidents. Fall interventions were not in place for a resident with multiple falls and neurological (neuro) checks were not fully completed after unwitnessed falls. (Resident 5)Findings include:During an observation on 8/27/25 at 12:55 P.M., Resident 5 was in the recliner with regular white socks on.On 8/27/25 at 8:56 A.M., Resident 5's clinical record was reviewed. Diagnoses included, but was not limited to, fracture of right pubis, hypertension, anxiety disorder, and depression.The most recent quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 8/6/25, indicated Resident 5 was cognitively intact and substantial to maximal assistance of staff (staff performs more than half the effort) for transfers and toileting, and Resident 6 had a fall with fracture in the last 6 months.Resident 5's Physician's Orders included, but was not limited to the following:Call don't fall sign in the bathroom, dated 8/25/25Non-skid strips on the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-09-02 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
  Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure it was free of a medication error rate of greater than 5 percent for 1 of 5 residents (Resident 31) observed during the medication pass. There were 25 opportunities for error observed with 3 medication errors, resulting in a medication error rate of 12 percent.Finding includes:On 8/28/25 at 7:27 A.M., Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) 43 was while they prepared and administered medications to Resident 31. They used Anti-bacterial Hand Rub (ABHR) prior to setting up medications. They measured out 10 milliliters (mL) of Docusate Sodium into a medication cup. They put the Tradjenta and Levothyroxine into another medication cup and the Metoprolol Succinate Extended Release (ER) in another. They crushed all the medications, keeping the Metoprolol separated. They labeled that medication cup with BP. They proceeded to mix the crushed medications in both cups with a spoonful of pudding. They took the medications and vitals machine into the resident's room, took her blood pressure (126/55) with the machine, washed…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to TRILOGY HEALTH SERVICES — 123 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 36 rows in the source record cover these 26 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

18 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $1.1M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 14% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in IN