Arlington Place Health Campus

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

60.4% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 170 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 57.4% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 61 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.53 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 83% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 16% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 84 beds and averages 67.5 residents a day — about 80% occupied, or roughly 16 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.74 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.51 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.02 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.27 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.93 on weekdays — 17% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.51 to 0.51 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 48% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

21 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 11 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · E2026-05-29 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
  Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure food temperatures were at an appetizing temperature and kept at safe holding temperatures. This had the potential to affect 70 of 70 residents that eat the food prepared and served from the kitchen.Findings include:An interview was conducted with Resident D on 5/28/26 at 10:29 a.m. She indicated breakfast, lunch and dinner meals were always served cold.An observation was made of the main kitchen with the DM 11 on 5/28/26 at 12:26 p.m., Dietary Manager (DM) 11 utilizing a thermometer had taken the food temperatures of the prepared food to be served. The smoked sausage had tempted 123 degrees Fahrenheit. DM 11 indicated the smoked sausage needed to be reheated. He preferred all food to be held at 150 degrees Fahrenheit, but the regulation stated food temperatures were to be held at 135 degrees Fahrenheit.During a dining observation on 5/28/26 at 11:57 a.m., Residents' N, O, P were sitting in the dining room waiting for the lunch meal. They indicated the food that was supposed to be hot, was served cold at…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-05-29 · tag F0554 — isolated
  Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to timely complete self-medication assessments for a resident who had medication at bedside and a resident that self administered her insulin medications 2 of 3 residents medication administration. (Resident F and Resident D) Findings include: 1. The clinical record for Resident F was reviewed on 5/28/26 at 11:00 a.m. The resident's diagnosis included, but was not limited to, depression (serious mood disorder). A Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment, completed 5/7/26, indicated the resident was moderately cognitively impaired. A care plan, last reviewed 5/20/26, indicated Resident F presented with a diagnosis of depression. The goal was for the resident to remain free of the symptoms of depression. The interventions included to administer medications as ordered by the physician. On 5/28/26 at 11:58 a.m., Resident F was observed in his room, sitting in his bed. The bedside table was next to the bed. A medication cup containing 4 pills was observed on the bedside table. Resident F indicated the nurse had…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-12-08 · tag F0552 — isolated
  Ensure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the resident representative for a cognitively impaired resident was informed in advance of the risks and benefits of medications for 1 of 5 residents reviewed for informed consent. (Resident 3)Findings include:The clinical record for Resident 3 was reviewed on 12/4/25 at 10:27 a.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, dementia, chronic kidney disease, and severe protein-calorie malnutrition.A Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 10/10/25, indicated the resident was severely impaired cognitively.A physician's order, dated 10/4/25 and discontinued 10/8/25, indicated to administer olanzapine (an antipsychotic medication) 2.5 milligrams twice per day.A physician's order, dated 10/7/25, indicated to administer Trazodone (an antidepressant medication which could be used as an off-label treatment for insomnia) 25 milligrams at bedtime for insomnia.A facility psychotropic medication informed consent observation, dated 10/8/25, indicated Resident 3 was educated on the risks, benefits, alternative treatment…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-12-08 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
  Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the resident representative for a cognitively impaired resident was notified of a significant weight loss for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for notification of change. (Resident 3)Findings include:The clinical record for Resident 3 was reviewed on 12/4/25 at 10:27 a.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, dementia, chronic kidney disease, and severe protein-calorie malnutrition.A Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 10/10/25, indicated Resident 3 was severely impaired cognitively.A facility weight log indicated the following:On 10/4/25, the resident weighed 149 pounds on admission.On 11/14/25, the resident weighed 131.8 pounds.On 11/18/25, the resident weighed 130.3 pounds.Resident 3 had a significant weight loss of 11% from 10/4/25 to 11/14/25.There was no documentation in the clinical record to indicate the resident's representative was notified of the significant weight loss.During an interview, on 12/5/25 at 11:25 a.m., the Director of Nursing (DON) indicated Resident 3 had impaired cognition and the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-12-08 · tag F0628 — isolated
  Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a bed hold policy was provided to the resident and resident's representative at the time of discharge for 1 of 2 resident reviewed for hospitalization. (Resident 81)Findings include:The clinical record for Resident 81 was reviewed on 12/3/25 at 10:25 a.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, hyperlipidemia, obesity, and acute respiratory failure.A nursing progress note, dated 9/18/25 at 12:35 p.m., indicated Resident 81 was found unresponsive and the staff called 911. The resident was transported to the hospital.There was no documentation the bed hold policy was provided to Resident 81 or Resident 81's representative.A clinical discharge observation form, completed on 9/30/25, did not indicate whether the bed hold policy was provided to the resident and the resident's representative.During an interview, on 12/8/25 at 9:48 a.m., Clinical Support 1 indicated staff should provide the bed hold policy to the resident and resident's representative at the time of discharge.A current facility policy, titled Bed…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-12-08 · tag F0644 — isolated
  Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) was completed after the addition of mental health diagnoses and psychotropic medications for 2 of 4 residents reviewed for PASARR. (Resident 7 and 11)Findings include:1. The clinical record for Resident 7 was reviewed on 12/3/25 at 11:25 a.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, hypertensive chronic kidney disease, atrial fibrillation, a wedge compression fracture of the second lumbar vertebra, major depressive disorder, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and dementia without behavioral disturbance. A PASARR level I screening, dated 5/9/24, indicated Resident 7 was not prescribed any mental health medications and did not have any mental health or dementia diagnoses. A physician's order, dated 8/2/24 and discontinued 9/23/24, indicated to administer escitalopram oxalate (an antidepressant medication) 5 milligrams (mg) once a day for depression. On 9/23/24, the escitalopram oxalate order was changed to 10 mg at bedtime for depression. A physician's…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-12-08 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure medication carts were free of loose pills and debris, narcotic medications with compromised packaging were destroyed, as needed (PRN) controlled drug use records contained documented of approval by a licensed nurse prior to administration and a pharmacy label for a narcotic medication matched the physician's order for 3 of 4 medication carts reviewed for medication storage and labeling. (100-hall cart 1, 100-hall cart 2 and 200-hall cart 2)Findings include:1. The 100-hall medication cart one (1) was observed on 12/4/25 at 9:12 a.m., and had the following:a. Drawer 2, contained two (2) loose pills and powdered debris collected in the bottom of the drawer against the back wall.b. Drawer 6, the narcotic box, contained a narcotic pill pack of oxycodone 5 milligram (mg) 1/2 tablets. The medication card had not been used for administration and contained 30, 1/2 tablets. Pocket 12 was observed to be compromised and was secured closed with a piece of clear tape; the 1/2 tablet was present in the package.c.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-08 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure enhanced barrier precaution signs were posted for residents who required enhanced barrier precaution isolation for 3 of 8 residents reviewed for infection control. (Resident 5, 86 and 87)Findings include: 1. During an observation, on 12/1/25 at 10:18 a.m., Resident 5 had a wound vacuum (a device used to speed up closure by optimizing the wound bed for healing). Resident 5 did not have an enhanced barrier precaution sign posted in or on the outside of the room.During an observation, on 12/1/25 at 11:16 a.m., Resident 5 did not have an enhanced barrier precaution sign posted in or on the outside of the room.During an observation, on 12/1/25 at 12:02 p.m., Resident 5 did not have an enhanced barrier precaution sign posted in or on the outside of the room.During an observation, on 12/1/25 at 2:20 p.m., Resident 5 did not have an enhanced barrier precaution sign posted in or on the outside of the room.The clinical record for Resident 5 was reviewed on 12/4/25 at 2:44 p.m. The diagnoses included, but were not…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-12-08 · tag F0887 — isolated
  Educate residents and staff on COVID-19 vaccination, offer the COVID-19 vaccine to eligible residents and staff after education, and properly document each resident and staff member's vaccination status.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure consents were documented accurately prior to administering a Covid vaccine for 1 of 5 residents reviewed for immunizations. (Resident 51)Findings include: The clinical record for Resident 51 was reviewed on 12/4/25 at 2:15 p.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, acute cystitis without hematuria, anoxic brain damage, elevated white blood cell count, pulmonary fibrosis, dementia, type 2 diabetes mellitus with hyperglycemia, diabetic chronic kidney disease, and aphasia.A Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) assessment, dated 11/6/25, indicated Resident 51 had severe cognitive impairment.A COVID vaccination consent form, dated 1/11/24 at 4:20 p.m., indicated Resident 51's representative refused the COVID vaccination.A COVID vaccination consent form, dated 11/5/25, indicated Resident 51's representative had not signed the consent form for Resident 51 to receive the vaccine. It indicated the Moderna COVID vaccination was given on 11/7/25, in the left arm.A physician's order, dated 11/7/25, indicated the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2024-10-21 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure beard coverings were worn by the dietary staff with facial hair. This has a potential to affect 42 of 42 residents that receive food prepared in the kitchen. Findings include: An observation was made of the Kitchen with the Director of Food Services on 10/15/24 at 11:44 a.m. During the tour, [NAME] 5 was observed at the food preparation area preparing the lunch meal. [NAME] 5 had facial hair on his lip and chin with no beard covering. An interview was conducted with the Director of Food Services on 10/15/24 at 11:55 a.m. He indicated [NAME] 5 should be wearing a beard covering. A [NAME] and Mustache policy was provided by the Administrator on 10/17/24 at 11:30 a.m. It indicated, .Policy. [NAME] and mustache hair must be covered while in kitchen food product areas. Facial hair restraints are required in any production area. Purpose. Beards and mustache must be covered while in kitchen food product areas. Facial hair restraints are required in any food production area. Facial hair is not exempt from the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to TRILOGY HEALTH SERVICES — 123 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 29 rows in the source record cover these 27 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

14 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $1.2M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 12% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in IN