Forest Park Health Campus

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

61.6% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 130 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 78.8% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 80 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.47 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 78% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 1% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 70 beds and averages 54.6 residents a day — about 78% occupied, or roughly 15 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 2.95 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.91 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.63 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.64 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.08 on weekdays — 14% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.92 to 0.88 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 48% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 2 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

16 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 6 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-15 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to assist a resident timely with incontinence care for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for Activities of Daily Living. (Resident B) Findings include:The clinical record for Resident B was reviewed on 5/14/26 at 12:06 p.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, major depressive disorder, anxiety, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (progressive lung disease that blocks air-flow and causes severe breathing difficulty). A Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 2/5/26, indicated Resident B was cognitively intact, had no behaviors for rejection of care, was dependent with toileting and hygiene (the ability to maintain perineal hygiene, adjust cloths before and after voiding or having a bowel movement), was non-ambulatory, and was always incontinent of bowel and bladder. During an interview with Resident B and her family member on 5/14/26 at 11:35 a.m., indicated Resident B had an incontinent episode of stool while doing activities. Per family member, when they found her, she had stool coming through her brief…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-02-25 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain residents' dignity regarding timely answering call lights for provision of activities of daily living care for 12 of 56 residents in the facility. (Residents 5, 6, 8, 10, 12, 13, 24, 30, 38, 39, 42, and 44) Findings include:1. The clinical record for Resident 6 was reviewed on 2/23/2026 at 2:05 p.m. The resident's diagnoses included, but were not limited to, emphysema (a chronic, progress lung disease) and heart failure (a chronic, serious condition where the heart cannot pump enough blood and oxygen to support the body's needs). A Quarterly Minimum Data Set Assessment, dated 12/11/2025, indicated Resident 6 was cognitively intact, did not exhibit behaviors, occasionally incontinent of bladder, always continent of bowel, needed partial to moderate assistance from staff for transferring and toilet hygiene. An activity of daily living care plan, last revised on 12/26/2025, indicated Resident 6 had fluctuating activities of daily living (ADL) status, but needed supervision with transfers and toileting tasks. An…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-02-25 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to timely address a resident's family grievance, regarding missing pajamas, for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for personal property. (Resident 39) Findings include:The clinical record for Resident 39 was reviewed on 2/20/26 at 12:15 p.m. Her diagnoses included, but were not limited to: dysphagia, chronic kidney disease, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (a progressive, treatable, but generally irreversible lung disease characterized by long-term inflammation and restricted airflow,) and diabetes. She received hospice services at the facility. An interview was conducted with Family Member 5 on 2/20/26 at 12:18 p.m. She indicated Resident 39 was currently missing a set of red plaid pajamas and a set of green plaid pajamas. The pajamas had been missing since Christmas of 2025. She'd asked staff about it several times since then, including several Certified Resident Care Assistants (CRCAs) and a nurse, described as Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) 7. The Executive Director (ED) provided the grievance log from 9/1/25 to…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-25 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview, observation, and record review, the facility failed to provide nail care to an dependent resident for 1 of 4 residents reviewed for activities of daily living. (Resident 10) The clinical record for Resident 10 was reviewed on 2/24/2026 at 11:07 a.m. The medical diagnoses included, but were not limited to, acute respiratory failure and metabolic encephalopathy. An annual MDS assessment, dated 1/8/2026, indicated Resident 10 had mild cognitive impairment, did not exhibit behaviors of rejection of care, had impairments of one upper extremity and both lower extremities, substantial to maximal assistance with personal hygiene needs. An ADL care plan, revised 1/19/2026, indicated Resident 10 required staff assistance for self care and mobility. The interventions included, but were not limited to, staff were to provide nail care on shower days and as needed. During an observation and interview, on 2/19/2026 at 1:06 p.m., Resident 10 was observed in bed. Resident 10's fingernails were long and had yellow substance under them. Resident 10 indicated he would like his…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-25 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
  Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview, observation, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the placement of a palmgrip as ordered for 1 of 1 residents reviewed for range of motion. (Resident 10)The clinical record for Resident 10 was reviewed on 2/24/2026 at 11:07 a.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, acute respiratory failure and metabolic encephalopathy. An annual MDS assessment, dated 1/8/2026, indicated Resident 10 had mild cognitive impairment, did not exhibit behaviors of rejection of care, had impairments of one upper extremity and both lower extremities, substantial to maximal assistance with personal hygiene needs. A pain care plan, revised 1/19/2026, indicated Resident 10 was at risk for skin breakdown and pain related to left hand join contracture. The interventions included, but were not limited to, to ensure there was protective padding to prevent skin on skin contact and palmgrip per MD orders. Resident 10's palmgrip was a soft cushion device intended to be placed in the palm of the left hand. A physician's order, dated 1/05/2026, indicated for Resident 10 to…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-25 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to transfer a resident in a manner that was safe and comfortable and failed to follow the resident's care profile for a mechanical lift for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for accidents (Resident 43). Finding include:During an interview with Resident 43's family member on 2/19/2026 at 1:39 p.m., the family member indicated the resident was unable to bare weight during transfers on either leg. The facility staff transferred the resident by lifting her underneath her arms with two people and no gait belt. The family member was concerned this was painful to the resident because the resident would moan during transfers. During an observation on 2/23/2026 at 10:45 a.m., the Assistant Director of Health Services (ADHS) and Certified Resident Care Assistant (CRCA) 5 placed a gait belt around Resident 43's waist, the staffs' hands were underneath the resident's arms and transferred the resident from the geriatric chair to the bed. The resident was unable to bare weight on either of her legs and moaned during the transfer. The…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-02-25 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
  Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure a resident's code status post form and physician order matched the resident's wishes for end of life care for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for accurate documentation (Resident 67). Finding include :During an interview with the Director Of Health Services (DHS) on 2/23/26 at 12:50 p.m., the DHS indicated the admitted nurse and the clinical review team were responsible to ensure Resident 67's post form for code status and her doctors orders matched each other. The facility did talk with Resident 67 and she decided at this time she would like to be a full code. Review of the clinical record of Resident 67 on 2/23/2026 at 1:45 p.m., indicated the resident's diagnoses included, but were not limited to, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease with (acute) exacerbation, acute on chronic diastolic (congestive) heart failure, acute respiratory failure with hypercapnia and acute and chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia, acute. The post form for Resident 67, dated 10/30/25, indicated the resident wished to be a Do Not Resuscitate…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-02-04 · tag F0554 — isolated
  Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to have the interdisciplinary team (IDT) determine and document that self-administration of medications was clinically appropriate for 1 of 1 resident randomly observed with medications at the bedside. (Resident 39) Findings include: The clinical record for Resident 39 was reviewed 1/31/25 at 9:46 a.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, hypertensive heart disease with heart failure, and obesity. During an observation and interview with Resident 39 on 1/30/25 at 10:28 a.m., a full cup of open pills and a clear vial of fluid used for breathing treatments was located beside Resident 39. He indicated the cup of pills were all his morning medications and the vial was his medicine for his breathing treatments that he administered himself. An Annual Minimum Data Set assessment, completed 12/12/24, indicated he was cognitively intact for daily decision making. Resident 39's clinical record, reviewed on 1/31/25 at 11:00 a.m., did not have a physician's order for…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-04 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents received assistance with bathing as preferred for 3 of 3 residents reviewed for activities of daily living. (Resident 7, Resident 41, and Resident 31) Findings include: 1. The clinical record for Resident 7 was reviewed on 1/30/2025 at 1:10 p.m. The medical diagnoses included pulmonary disease and osteoarthritis. A Quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment, dated 11/15/2024, indicated Resident 7 was cognitively intact and needed substantial/maximal assistance with bathing. An activities of daily living care plan, revised 11/25/2024, indicated Resident 7's preference for showers were on Mondays, Wednesdays, and Saturdays. During an observation and interview on 1/29/2025 at 1:31 p.m., Resident 7 indicated she was lucky to get one [shower] a month. Resident 7's hair was noted to be greasy at that time. Resident 7 indicated she did not feel clean and she had not had a shower in about a week. Review of the shower documentation indicated Resident 7 only received two showers for the month of January…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-02-04 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to identify a skin alternation for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for general skin impairments. (Resident 45) Findings include: The clinical record for Resident 45 was reviewed on 2/3/2025 at 2:03 p.m. The medical diagnoses included edema and dysphagia. An admission assessment, dated 12/12/2024, indicated Resident 45 did not have any skin impairments. A physician order, dated 12/12/2024, indicated Weekly skin assessment completed. New treatments and notifications completed for any new areas noted. Review of the Medication Administration Record for Resident 45's weekly skin assessments were completed each week. The MAR reflected only then the initials of the staff completing the assessment, but no other results were recorded. During an observation and interview on 1/29/2025 at 1:21 p.m., Resident 45 indicated he had an abrasion on his right ankle. Resident 45 stated this area had been present for over a year and he was treating it with over-the-counter cortisone spray he bought from a local store then covered the area…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to TRILOGY HEALTH SERVICES — 123 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 31 rows in the source record cover these 27 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

18 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $1.4M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 17% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in IN