Springhurst Health Campus

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

66.7% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 247 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 78.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 109 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.48 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 79% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 25% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 74 beds and averages 55.9 residents a day — about 76% occupied, or roughly 18 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.30 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 1.06 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.40 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.69 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.55 on weekdays — 19% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.16 to 0.78 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 39% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

25 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 14 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2026-03-23 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
  Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to correctly transcribe the hospital's discharge orders for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for accuracy of physician orders for a newly admitted resident. This deficient practice resulted in a resident not having a diagnosis of diabetes identified and not receiving his hospital discharged ordered insulin for five (5) days, which contributed to the resident having elevated (high) blood glucose, diminished cognitive levels, lethargy and being sent out to the local hospital. The resident was sent out to the local hospital on 2-13-26, at the request of the family. He was subsequently admitted to the local hospital the same date for altered mental status, possibly related to dehydration, infection or diabetic ketoacidosis. (Resident B) The Immediate Jeopardy began on 2/6/26 when the facility failed to correctly transcribe the hospital's discharge orders for a resident resulting in the resident not having a diagnosis of diabetes identified and not receiving his…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Potential for harm · F2025-06-17 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — widespread
  Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure sufficient nursing staff to provide activities of daily living (ADL) care, skin care treatments, and maintain residents' dignity. This deficient practice had the potential to affect 61 of 61 residents in the facility. Findings include: A confidential interview was conducted with a resident. They indicated there were not enough staff in the facility to help them. They forgot about them when they pressed their call light, and it made them feel unimportant. An interview was conducted with Resident P on 6/10/25 at 1:23 p.m. She indicated it took thirty minutes for staff to help her, after she pressed her call light. An interview was conducted with Resident S on 6/11/25 at 11:27 a.m. She indicated the facility was short staffed most of the time. An interview was conducted with Family Member 7 on 6/11/25 at 10:56 a.m. She indicated the facility was short staffed. The staff tried, but a lot of times, there was only one CRCA (Certified Resident Care Assistant) on duty for the hall, and one person couldn't do everything. The…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-06-17 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — pattern
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to assist dependent residents with shaving per preference and provide activities of daily living (ADL) care in a timely manner for 4 of 7 residents reviewed for activities of daily living. (Resident E, Resident G, Resident L, and Resident J) Findings include: 1. The clinical record for Resident E was reviewed on 6/16/2025 at 1:20 p.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, urinary tract infection and depression. A Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 5/14/2025, indicated Resident E was cognitively intact, utilized an indwelling urinary catheter, and needed substantial/maximal assistance with toileting hygiene, upper and lower body dressing, and personal hygiene. An activities of daily living care plan, revised 6/2/2025, indicated to offer Resident E shaving on shower days and as needed. Resident E's shower days were Monday and Thursday. A depression care plan for Resident E indicated the staff were to encourage the resident to voice their feelings and provide support. During an interview and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-17 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  2. The clinical record for Resident F was reviewed on 6/11/25 at 10:30 a.m. His diagnoses included, but were not limited to, Parkinson's disease. An interview was conducted with Family Member 4 on 6/11/25 at 10:38 a.m. She indicated there was an incident involving Resident F and CRCA (Certified Resident Care Assistant) 15 in March 2025 in his room. Resident F had bowel issues. It wasn't a happy situation, and CRCA 16 had to clean it up. CRCA 16 said it was gross right in front of him. They filed a grievance about it. Family Member 4 received a call back afterwards, stating the facility would be doing more staff training. The grievance log for the past six months was provided by Clinical Support on 6/12/25 at 10:48 a.m. There were only two grievances associated with Resident F, both dated 3/6/25, and both filed by Family Member 4. One was in regards to his room not being stocked with wipes, briefs, and trash bags, as there was an incident on 3/4/25, where none of these items were available. The grievance was resolved by the DHS (Director of Health Services.) The other grievance was…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-06-17 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
  Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident's call light was within reach for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for call light accessibility. (Resident 218) Findings include: During an observation and interview with Resident 218 on 6/11/25 at 9:59 a.m., Resident 218 was sitting in a wheelchair in the middle of her room. The call light was on the other side of the room on the floor beside her bed. Resident 218 indicated when staff would get her up during the day, she could never reach her call light and had no way of contacting staff when she needed help. She indicated every night she would get anxious before bed because staff would shut her door and she's not sure if she would have her call light or not, and if not, she had no way of contacting staff and had to yell out for help. During an observation and interview with Resident 218 on 6/12/25 at 10:15 a.m., Resident 218 was sitting in her wheelchair in the middle of her room. The call light was on the opposite side of the bed across the room. Resident 218 indicated she was glad someone came…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-06-17 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to immediately report an allegation of abuse to the ED (Executive Director) and IDOH (Indiana Department of Health) for 2 of 2 residents reviewed for abuse. (Resident D and Resident H) Findings include: 1. The clinical record for Resident H was reviewed on 6/10/25 at 12:11 p.m. His diagnoses included, but were not limited to, dementia. The 6/2/25 admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment indicated he was severely cognitively impaired. The 6/11/25 care plan indicated he expressed interest in compassionate touching and did not have capacity to give consent. The 6/6/25, 9:30 p.m. nurse's note for Resident H, recorded as a late entry on 6/7/25 at 7:45 a.m. by RN (Registered Nurse) 5, indicated, Resident was found in other residents room both were in w/c's [wheelchairs,] he was observed to have his hand on her leg and one on her shoulder. Residents were told that they need to be in common area with staff members and not in each others rooms. Both residents compliant with redirection. No injury noted, physically or…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-06-17 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
  Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to identify and initiate a thorough investigation into an alleged violation of abuse for 2 of 2 residents reviewed for abuse. (Residents D and H) Findings include: 1. Resident D's 6/6/25, 9:30 p.m. nurse's note, recorded as a late entry on 6/7/25 at 7:45 a.m. by RN 5, indicated Resident was found in other residents room both were in w/c's, he was observed to have his hand on her leg and one on her shoulder. Residents were told that they need to be in common area with staff members and not in each others rooms . Both residents compliant with redirection. No injury noted, physically or mentally. ADHS notifie Resident D's 6/9/25, 4:38 p.m. IDT (Interdisciplinary Team) note, written by the DHS (Director of Health Services) indicated, Patient reviewed for visiting with other resident. Other resident entered room and they were having a conversation. He had his land on her leg and another on her shoulder. Patient is social and friendly. Encouraged to visit in common areas as she is confused at baseline. Patient…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-06-17 · tag F0640 — isolated
  Encode each resident’s assessment data and transmit these data to the State within 7 days of assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to timely transmit a Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for 1 of 9 residents reviewed for MDS Assessments. (Resident 21) Findings include: The clinical record for Resident 21 was reviewed on 6/16/2025 at 11:40 a.m. The diagnosis included, but was not limited to, dementia. A Quarterly MDS assessment, had an assessment reference date (ARD) of 5/9/2025. This assessment was completed on 5/22/2025. An MDS transmission report, provided on 6/16/2025 at 2:20 p.m., indicated the Quarterly MDS assessment for Resident 21 with an ARD of 5/9/2025 was transmitted on 6/13/2025. During an interview, on 6/16/2025 at 1:35 p.m., MDS Support indicated they utilize the RAI (Resident Assessment Instrument) Manual for guidance on timeliness of MDS Assessments. For Quarterly assessments, they have 14 days to transmit the completed assessments, but this was not done because she was busy with end of month activities.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-17 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  3. The clinical record for Resident Q was reviewed on 6/11/25 at 11:00 a.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, overactive bladder and urinary tract infection. An interview and observation were conducted with Family Member 7 on 6/11/25 at 11:05 a.m. She indicated Resident Q had a history of UTIs (urinary tract infections.) During her most recent care plan meeting a couple of weeks ago, they discussed Resident Q having a possible allergy to Bactrim, an antibiotic medication used to treat UTIs. The staff at the care plan meeting said they would chart it, but she wasn't sure what happened, because she was just prescribed it again a couple of days ago, and Resident Q's lips swelled up, like they did in April 2025, when she was prescribed it. At this time, Family Member 7 displayed two photographs on her cell phone. One, dated 4/13/25 at 11:38 a.m., was Resident Q with a very red, swollen, bottom lip. Family Member 7 indicated Resident Q had to have a cream applied to her lips for it. The other photograph, dated 6/9/25 at 7:44 p.m., was of Resident Q with a red, swollen,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-06-17 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
  Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview, observation, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident's catheter drainage bag and tubing were free of contact with the floor for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for catheters. (Resident E) Findings include: The clinical record for Resident E was reviewed on 6/16/2025 at 1:20 p.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, urinary tract infection and depression. A Minimum Data Set Assessment, dated 5/14/2025, indicated Resident E was cognitively intact, utilized an indwelling urinary catheter, and needed substantial/maximal assistance with toileting hygiene, upper and lower body dressing, and personal hygiene. A care guide care plan, initiated on 6/27/2024 and revised 6/13/2025, indicated to ensure Resident E's indwelling catheter did not touch the floor. A physician's order, dated 3/20/2025, indicated Resident E utilized an indwelling urinary catheter for neurogenic bladder. During an interview and observation, on 6/10/2025 at 1:59 p.m., Resident E was sitting in his wheelchair. The urinary catheter drainage bag and tubing were contacting the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-17 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
  Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow hospital discharge orders to discontinue medication upon readmission for 1 of 4 residents reviewed for quality of care. (Resident J) The clinical record for Resident J was reviewed on 6/12/25 at 10:04 a.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, anemia and atrial fibrillation. During an interview with Resident J on 6/11/25 at 12:51 p.m., Resident J indicated she had just returned from the hospital yesterday after having blood loss and thought she had been told they were going to hold all of her blood thinners for a while. The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 5/9/25, indicated Resident J was cognitively intact. The hospital Discharge summary, dated [DATE], was provided by MDS Support on 6/12/25 at 12:57 p.m. It indicated Resident J had a discharge diagnosis of acute blood loss anemia and discontinue aspirin 81 mg po (by mouth) daily. The Medication Administration Record (MAR) for June 2025, indicated aspirin 81 mg po…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$21,645 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $21,645 — penalty dated 2026-03-23

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to TRILOGY HEALTH SERVICES — 123 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 58 rows in the source record cover these 32 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

20 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $1.8M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 14% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in IN