Smiths Mill Health Campus
7320 Smiths Mill Road, New Albany, OH 43054 · For profit - Corporation · 58 certified beds · (614) 245-1060 Medicare & Medicaid certified
The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.
- no federal fines or payment denials on record
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0605, F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- a high number of inspection citations overall (51) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
- nursing-staff turnover (57%) runs well above the national median (45%)
- CMS ownership filings flag it as owned by a private-equity firm or REIT — a category that performs worse on staffing on average, though that average says nothing certain about this home, and CMS filings undercount these ties, so other homes here may have them unflagged (what the research actually shows →)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 2 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 3 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 5 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 5 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 5 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 5 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 3 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 4.0% | 5.3% | 15.4% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 13.6% | 6.2% | 5.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.0% | 0.2% | 0.9% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.0% | 0.4% | 2.0% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 21.4% | 30.1% | 6.5% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 2.1% | 3.2% | 3.3% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 25.4% | 25.5% | 18.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 70.8% | 94.5% | 95.3% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 5.4% | 3.4% | 4.7% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 19.1% | 21.4% | 21.2% | typical |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 2.4% | 8.8% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 0.6% | 1.2% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 83.9% | 75.6% | 79.4% | typical |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 26.9% | 24.9% | 22.6% | worse |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 12.1% | 12.9% | 12.0% | typical |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
63.2% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 189 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 69.9% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 73 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.58 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 87% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 8% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 63.2%CMS range 54.7–71.5 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | better than U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 9.8%CMS range 7.4–13.1 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 69.9% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 64.4% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 61.6% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 87.2% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 84.8% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | 85.9% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 0.0% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 7.6%CMS range 4.8–11.1 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 0.97 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 58 beds and averages 49.4 residents a day — about 85% occupied, or roughly 9 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.57 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 1.09 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.64 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.10 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.76 on weekdays — 18% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.30 to 0.56 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 57% is well above the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
51 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 41 are one tap away and print in full.
- Potential for harm · F2026-04-30 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — widespreadEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation, staff interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to properly store drugs and biologicals in the medication storage rooms and ensure all medications were properly stored in a secured location. This affected two of two medication rooms reviewed for medication storage. This affected Resident #31 and had the potential to affect all 49 residents in the facility.Findings include:1. An observation on [DATE] at 10:49 A.M. revealed in both of the facility's medication storage rooms, in the cabinets, multiple boxes containing 100 three milliliter (ml) syringes with expiration date of [DATE]. The medication storage areas also revealed multiple boxes containing tuberculin syringes with an expiration date of [DATE]. Observation in the freezer in the storage room revealed a single serve Vanilla Ensure (nutritional supplement), with an expiration date of [DATE]. The storage room's refrigerator revealed a 25 milligram (mg) Promethazine (anti-nausea) suppository…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-04-30 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — patternDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, medical record review, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to conduct care plan conferences at regular intervals for residents. This affected four (Residents #19, #50, #61, and #62) of four residents reviewed for care planning. The facility census was 49 residents.Findings include:1. Review of Resident #50's medical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had diagnoses that included unspecified dementia, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, hypertension, depression, and dependence on wheelchair. Further review of Resident #50's medical record revealed the last documented care conference was 05/08/25. Review of Resident #50's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident had severely impaired cognitive skills for daily decision making and was dependent for oral hygiene, toileting hygiene, shower or bathe self, lower body dressing, putting on or taking off footwear, and personal hygiene. Interview on 04/27/26 at 11:37 A.M.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-04-30 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolatedReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure the call light was in reach for residents. This affected three (Resident #9, #27, and #50) of five residents reviewed for environment. The facility census was 49 residents.Findings include:Findings include:1.Review of Resident #9's medical record revealed the resident was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had diagnoses including unspecified dementia, major depressive disorder, anxiety disorder, weakness, history of falling, feeding difficulties, unsteadiness on feet, and muscle weakness.Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #9 was cognitively impaired and required substantial or maximal assistance to roll left or right and to move from lying to sitting on the side of the bed.Review of Resident #9's plan of care for falls revealed a intervention to keep call light within reach with a start date of 12/16/20.Observation on 04/27/26 at 9:46 A.M. of Resident #9's call…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-04-30 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, medical record review, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to report an allegation of injury of unknown origin. This affected one (Resident #27) of two residents reviewed for abuse. The facility census was 49 residents.Findings include:1. Review of Resident #27's medical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including dementia, anxiety disorder, depression, and cerebral atherosclerosis.Review of Resident #27's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident had severely impaired cognitive skills for daily decision making. Resident #27 required substantial or maximal assistance to roll left and right, move from sitting to lying, and move from lying to sitting on the side of bed. Resident #27 was dependent for bed to chair transfer and tub or shower transfer.Review of Resident #27's plan of care for falls revealed an intervention to provide an air mattress with bolsters to the bed with a start date of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-04-30 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, medical record review, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to investigate an allegation of injury of unknown origin for Resident #27. This affected one (Resident #27) of two residents reviewed for abuse. The facility census was 49 residents.Findings include:Review of Resident #27's medical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including dementia, anxiety disorder, depression, and cerebral atherosclerosis.Review of Resident #27's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident had severely impaired cognitive skills for daily decision making. Resident #27 required substantial or maximal assistance to roll left and right, move from sitting to lying, and move from lying to sitting on the side of bed. Resident #27 was dependent for bed to chair transfer and tub or shower transfer.Review of Resident #27's plan of care for falls revealed an intervention to provide an air mattress with bolsters to the bed with a start…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-04-30 · tag F0628 — isolatedProvide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of medical records, staff interviews and review of facility policy, the facility failed to issue a bed hold letter for a resident upon discharging to the hospital. Additionally, the facility failed to notify the Ombudsman of the discharge status of two residents. This affected two residents (#64 and 66) out of two residents reviewed for discharge. The facility census was 49 residents.Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #64 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had diagnoses including wedge compression fractures, type two diabetes mellitus and chronic kidney disease. Review of Resident #64's Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 comprehensive assessment dated [DATE] revealed intact cognitive status and receiving opioid medication.Review of Resident #64's nursing progress notes dated 03/16/26 revealed Resident #64 wanted to leave the facility. Resident #64 expressed a desire for his pain medications to be changed. Resident #64 was given options to stay at the facility to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-30 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of resident medical record, review of resident hospital records, and staff interviews, the facility failed to accurately transcribe a diet order for a resident. This affected one resident (#67) out of four residents reviewed for food. The facility census was 49 residents. Findings include: Review of a resident medical record revealed that Resident #67 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had medical diagnoses that included traumatic brain injury, dysphagia, and acute respiratory failure with hypoxia. Review of Resident #67's hospital medical record dated 04/24/26 revealed that Resident #67 had hypoxia, which was possibly related to bouts of aspiration pneumonitis due to pocketing food. The hospital notes dated 04/24/26 indicated that Resident #67 was started on a soft and bite sized diet with mildly thickened liquids. Review of Resident #67's hospital after visit summary dated 04/24/26 revealed that Resident #67 was prescribed a discharge diet of soft and bite sized foods with mildly…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-04-30 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, medical record review, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to change oxygen tubing as ordered by the physician and facility policy. This affected one (Resident #30) of two residents reviewed for oxygen services. The facility census was 49.Findings include:Review of Resident #30's medical record revealed an admission date of 11/22/25 and diagnoses included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #30 was cognitively intact and received oxygen therapy.Review of Resident #30's physician orders dated 01/02/26 revealed an order to change oxygen tubing monthly.Observation on 04/27/26 at 10:22 A.M. revealed Resident #30's oxygen tubing was dated as last changed on January 20 (no year).Interview on 04/27/26 at 10:30 A.M. with Registered Nurse (RN) #159 confirmed Resident #30's oxygen tubing was dated as last changed on January 20 (no year) and should have been changed sooner.Review of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-30 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolatedEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, review of the monthly pharmacy recommendations, staff interviews, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to address pharmacy recommendations in a timely manner for the residents. This affected three (#11, #27, and #54) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The facility census was 49.Findings include: 1. Review of the resident medical record revealed Resident #54 was admitted to the facility on [DATE].Diagnoses included abdominal aortic aneurysm and posthemorrhagic anemia. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #54 had intact cognition. Review of the care plan dated 01/09/26 revealed Resident #54 had potential for experiencing symptoms of fatigue, weakness and confusion related to anemia. A goal was for Resident #54 to be free from complications associated with anemia. An intervention was to monitor labs as ordered. Review of Resident #54's complete blood count on 01/21/26 revealed she had a hemoglobin level of 7.8…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-30 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolatedEnsure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, medical record review, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to implement non-pharmacological interventions in the management of a resident's pain. This affected one (Resident #27) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The facility census was 49.Findings include:Review of Resident #27's medical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included dementia and anxiety disorder.Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #27 had severely impaired cognitive skills for daily decision making and received scheduled and as needed pain medications.Review of the physician orders dated 06/02/25 revealed an order for morphine solution as needed for pain.Review of Resident #27's care plan for pain revealed an intervention to attempt non-pharmacological interventions with a start date of 07/10/25.Review of the Medication Administration Records (MARs) from July 2025 to April 2026 revealed Resident #27…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 41 citations
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-30 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation, staff interview and review of facility policy, the facility failed to maintain a proper containment system for soiled personal protective equipment for a resident. This affected one (Resident #26) of five residents reviewed for infection control. The facility census was 49. Findings include: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #26 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included severe sepsis with septic shock, recurrent enterocolitis due to clostridium difficile, and encounter for attention to colostomy. Review of the comprehensive Minimum Data Set 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #26 required substantial to maximal assistance from staff with toileting hygiene. Review of Resident #26's hospital record dated 04/15/26 revealed Resident #26 had clostridium toxin B detected, but not active infection, and she was a carrier of clostridium toxin. In response, Resident #26 was on oral vancomycin, an antibiotic. Review of Resident #26's care…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-02-18 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, medical record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure one resident who was dependent on staff for eating was provided a dignified dining experience when his meal tray was left for an extended period of time before staff returned to feed him. This affected one resident (#22) of six sampled residents. The facility census was 49. Findings Include:Review of the medical record for Resident #22 revealed an initial admission date of 02/06/25 with the diagnoses including but not limited to Guillain-Barre syndrome, dysphagia, retention of urine, diabetes mellitus, hyperlipidemia, hypertension and functional quadriplegia. Review of the plan of care dated 02/20/25 revealed the resident required staff dependence to complete self-care and mobility functional tasks completely and safely. Review of resident's functional abilities dated 02/10/26 revealed the resident was dependent on staff for eating. On 02/11/26 at 11:55 A.M., an interview/observation with Resident #22 revealed the resident's lunch tray was sitting untouched on the resident's bedside table. The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-18 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, open and closed medical record review, hospital record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure physician ordered treatments were provided to non-pressure skin impairments. Additionally, the facility failed to identify a change in condition timely. This affected one resident (#19) of three residents reviewed for skin breakdown and one resident (#50) of three residents reviewed for change in condition. The facility census was 49. Findings Include:1. Review of the medical record for Resident #19 revealed an initial admission date of 02/01/26 with the diagnoses including but not limited to infection and inflammatory reaction due to other cardiac and vascular devices, implants and grafts, toxic encephalopathy, cellulitis of right lower limb, myositis, right thigh, peripheral vascular disease, anemia, atrial fibrillation, hypertension, congestive heart failure, retention of urine, cardiac arrythmia, left below the knee amputation, dementia, insomnia, chronic pain syndrome, benign…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-18 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, interview, hospital summary review, review of staffing schedules and facility policy review, the facility failed to provide adequate supervision and /or assistive devices to prevent falls and/or injury for those residents with a cognitive deficit. Additionally, the facility failed to ensure one resident was assisted in bed mobility in a manner to prevent falls from bed. This affected three residents (#19, #50 and #51) of three residents reviewed for falls. The facility census was 49. Findings Include:1. Review of the closed medical record for Resident #50 revealed an initial admission date of 01/29/26 with the diagnoses including but not limited to displaced subtrochanteric fracture of right femur, subsequent encounter for closed fracture with routine healing, effusion of right knee, anemia, cerebral ischemia, retention of urine, Alzheimer's disease, dementia, unspecified fall, adult failure to thrive, constipation, osteoarthritis, other specified disorder of right middle ear and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-18 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — isolatedProvide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, interview and daily assignment sheet review, the facility failed to ensure sufficient levels of staffing to supervise to prevent falls. This affected one resident (#50) of three residents reviewed for falls. The facility census was 49. Findings Include:. Review of the closed medical record for Resident #50 revealed an initial admission date of 01/29/26 with the diagnoses including but not limited to displaced subtrochanteric fracture of right femur, subsequent encounter for closed fracture with routine healing, effusion of right knee, anemia, cerebral ischemia, retention of urine, Alzheimer's disease, dementia, unspecified fall, adult failure to thrive, constipation, osteoarthritis, other specified disorder of right middle ear and mastoid and personal history of malignant neoplasm of prostate and tongue. Review of the fall risk assessment dated [DATE] revealed a score of 22 indicating the resident was at high risk for falls. Review of the plan of care dated 01/29/26…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-18 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review, interview and review of after care summary, the facility failed to ensure physician orders were implemented in a timely manner. This affected one resident (#19) of six sampled residents. The facility census was 49. Findings Include:Review of the medical record for Resident #19 revealed an initial admission date of 02/01/26 with the diagnoses including but not limited to infection and inflammatory reaction due to other cardiac and vascular devices, implants and grafts, toxic encephalopathy, cellulitis of right lower limb, myositis, right thigh, peripheral vascular disease, anemia, atrial fibrillation, hypertension, congestive heart failure, retention of urine, cardiac arrythmia, left below the knee amputation, dementia, insomnia, chronic pain syndrome, benign prostatic hyperplasia and hypothyroidism. Review of the resident's Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score dated 02/02/26 revealed a score of 8 out of 15 indicating the resident had a moderate cognitive deficit. Review of the resident's after visit summary dated 02/13/25 revealed the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-02-18 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, interview and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure a complete and accurate electronic medical record (EMR). This affected two residents (#19 and #50) of six sampled residents. The facility census was 49. Findings Include:1. Review of the medical record for Resident #19 revealed an initial admission date of 02/01/26 with the diagnoses including but not limited to infection and inflammatory reaction due to other cardiac and vascular devices, implants and grafts, toxic encephalopathy, cellulitis of right lower limb, myositis, right thigh, peripheral vascular disease, anemia, atrial fibrillation, hypertension, congestive heart failure, retention of urine, cardiac arrythmia, left below the knee amputation, dementia, insomnia, chronic pain syndrome, benign prostatic hyperplasia and hypothyroidism. Review of the resident's Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score dated 02/02/26 revealed a score of 8 out of 15 indicating the resident had a moderate cognitive…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-18 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, interview and facility policy review, the facility failed to maintain appropriate infection control practices to prevent the potential spread of infection during a pressure ulcer dressing change. This affected one resident (#16) of three residents reviewed for skin breakdown. The facility census was 49. Findings Include:Review of the medical record for Resident #16 revealed an initial admission date of 11/19/25 with the diagnoses including but not limited to sepsis, urinary tract infection, osteomyelitis of vertebra, stage four pressure ulcer to sacral region, moderate protein calorie malnutrition, hypertension, congestive heart failure, encounter for palliative care, neuromuscular dysfunction of bladder, dementia, hyperlipidemia, hypothyroidism, cerebral infarction, adult failure to thrive and dysphagia. Review of the resident's comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident had a severe cognitive deficit. The resident was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-07-17 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolatedPrevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview, record review, review of facility policy and review of drug labels, the facility failed to have appropriate diagnoses to support the use of an antipsychotic medication. This affected one (Resident #10) out of three residents reviewed for antipsychotic medication administration. The facility census was 44. Findings Include:Review of the medical record for Resident #10 revealed an admission date of 03/17/24, with diagnoses including Parkinson's disease and dementia (without behavioral, psychotic, mood, or anxiety disturbances), altered mental status, and depression.Review of the care plan dated 10/16/24 revealed Resident #10 exhibited altered behaviors, including hallucinations. Interventions included identifying behavioral triggers, notifying the physician of changes, redirecting the resident when needed, and administering medications as ordered.Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] documented that the resident was severely cognitively impaired, displayed no…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-09 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, resident and staff interviews, record review, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure residents who had recent weight loss received their nutritional supplements and weighed according to physician orders. This affected one (Resident #18) of three residents reviewed for weight loss. The facility census was 39. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #18 revealed a re-entry date on 02/05/25. Diagnoses included pneumonia, respiratory failure, sepsis, pressure ulcers, dysphagia, chronic kidney disease, metabolic encephalopathy, and iron deficiency anemia. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #18 was cognitively intact, weighed 133 pounds (lbs), was on a physician prescribed weight gain, and on a therapeutic diet. Review of the physician orders for Resident #18 revealed she had an active orders for weights to be obtained monthly on the fifth (dated 10/19/24); Ensure Clear (high calorie nutritional supplement) once…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2025-02-25 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — widespreadHave a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to staff a registered nurse eight hours a day, seven days a week. The facility census was 42. Findings include: Review of staffing sheets and the staffing tool from 02/11/25 to 02/17/25, there was no registered nurse scheduled for 02/16/25. Interview on 02/24/25 at 10:30 A.M. with the Administrator confirmed there was no registered nurse on the assignment sheet for Saturday 02/16/25.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-25 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, resident interview, staff interview and policy review, the facility failed to provide transportation to a scheduled medical appointment. The affected one Resident ( #17), of three residents reviewed for transportation to medical appointments. The facility census was 42. Findings include: Resident #17 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included acute embolism and thrombosis of femoral vein, acute respiratory failure with hypoxia, Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome (SIRS) of non-infectious origin without acute organ dysfunction, pneumonia, sepsis, pressure ulcer of sacral region, atherosclerotic heart disease, chronic kidney disease, lymphedema, neutropenia, metabolic encephalopathy, chondrocalcinosis of left knee, urinary tract infection, tachycardia, dysphagia, altered mental status, and localized edema. Review of quarterly minimum data set (MDS) 3.0 dated 01/23/25 revealed Resident #17 was cognitively intact with a brief interview of mental status score (BIMS) of 13 out of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-25 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to keep one, Resident (#23), of three reviewed for fall risk, free from a fall during care. The facility census was 42. Findings Include: Resident #23 was admitted [DATE] with the most recent re-admission date of 12/07/24, diagnoses included metabolic encephalopathy, dysphagia, severe protein-calorie malnutrition, hyperosmolality and hypernatremia, hypokalemia, adult failure to thrive, low back pain, major depressive disorder, anxiety disorder, neurocognitive disorder with Lewy bodies, Vitamin D deficiency, and hallucinations. Review of the admission minimum data set (MDS) 3.0 dated 11/11/24 revealed the resident was unable to be interviewed, Resident #23 is rarely understood. Staff reported Resident #23 had both short-term and long-term memory problems. Resident #23 was dependent on staff for eating, personal hygiene, all activities of daily living and mobility. Resident #23 received no high-risk medications and no special…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-17 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical records review, shower sheet review, and staff interview, this facility failed to ensure residents received a bath or shower as scheduled and failed to provided supporting documents for provided shower sheets. This affected one (Resident #49) of the five residents reviewed for hygiene care. The facility census was 46. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #49 revealed an initial admission date of 10/18/2024 and a reentry date of 01/02/2025. Diagnoses included acute embolism and thrombosis of femoral vein bilateral, pulmonary embolism, stage two pressure ulcer of sacral region, and a history of urinary tract infections. Review of Resident #49's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14 out of 15 indicating an intact cognition for daily decision-making abilities. Resident #49 was noted to have an impairment to one lower extremity and required the use of a wheelchair for mobility. Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-17 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, wound clinic order review, and staff interview, this facility failed to ensure orders for lymphedema pumps were implemented as ordered. This affected one (Resident #49) of the five residents reviewed for physician orders. The facility summary was 46. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #49 revealed an initial admission date of 10/18/2024 and a reentry date of 01/02/2025. Diagnoses included acute embolism and thrombosis of femoral vein bilateral, pulmonary embolism, stage two pressure ulcer of sacral region, and a history of urinary tract infections. Review of Resident #49's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14 out of 15 indicating an intact cognition for daily decision-making abilities. Resident #49 was noted to have an impairment to one lower extremity and required the use of a wheelchair for mobility. Resident required setup or clean up assistance for eating, oral…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-17 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical records review, incident investigation review, and staff interview, this facility failed to ensure residents were free from injury when receiving assistance and transportation from facility staff. This affected one (Resident #49) of the five residents reviewed for accidents and injuries. The facility census was 46. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #49 revealed an initial admission date of 10/18/2024 and a reentry date of 01/02/2025. Diagnoses included acute embolism and thrombosis of femoral vein bilateral, pulmonary embolism, stage two pressure ulcer (partial thickness loss of dermis presenting as a shallow open ulcer with a red or pink wound bed, without bruising or slough) of sacral region, and a history of urinary tract infections. Review of Resident #49's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14 out of 15 indicating an intact cognition for daily decision-making abilities. Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-10-09 · tag F0638 — patternAssure that each resident’s assessment is updated at least once every 3 months.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, and review of the resident assessment instrument (RAI) guidelines, the facility failed to ensure that minimum data set assessment (MDS) were completed within required timeframe's. This affected eight (Resident #1, #4, #19, #20,#30, #31, #44 and #299. The census was 41. Findings included 1. Review of Resident #4's medical record revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included dementia, dysphasia, major depression, diabetes, incontinence, and atrial fibrillation. Review of the quarterly MDS dated [DATE] revealed her cognition is not intact. She had impairment to the upper and lower extremities on both sides, always incontinent of bowel and bladder, and no weight loss or wounds identified. Review of the MDS's revealed the following were completed late: Review of the quarterly MDS with the ARD (Assessment Reference Date) of 07/11/24 was not completed until 07/26/24 Review of the quarterly MDS with the ARD date of 06/28/24 was not completed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-10-09 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — patternProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, review of the medication administration record, staff interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure medications were available to be administered for one (Resident #20) resident and failed to ensure medication was administered timely as prescribed for four (Resident #12,#20,#30, and #22) residents. This affected four (Resident #12,#20,#30, and #22) residents out of 19 residents reviewed for medications. The facility census was 41. Findings include: 1. Resident #20 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included acute cystitis, Chronic Kidney Disease Stage III, diabetes, anxiety, depression, high blood pressure, and obesity. Review of the admission minimum data set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed his cognition was intact. He is dependent on staff for toileting, requires substantial assistance for shower/bathing,and personal hygiene. He is always incontinent of his bowel. Review of the physicians orders revealed an order dated 07/30/24 for Soliqua…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-10-09 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — patternEnsure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure proper parameters were identified for anticoagulant, as needed (PRN) pain, and blood pressure medications. The deficient practice affected five residents (Residents #12, 28, 96, 98, and 146) of eight residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The facility census was 41. Findings Include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #96 revealed an admission date on 09/14/24 and a discharge date on 10/01/24. Medical diagnoses included displaced intertrochanteric fracture of right femur, periprosthetic fracture around internal prosthetic right hip joint, paroxysmal atrial fibrillation, unspecified cirrhosis of liver, and anxiety disorder. Review of the census revealed Resident #96 was hospitalized from [DATE] to 09/25/24. There was not a comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment completed for Resident #96. Review of the physician orders dated September 2024 revealed Resident #96 had an order for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-09 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, resident representative and staff interviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to timely notify one resident's representative (Resident #34) and certified nurse practitioner (CNP) of changes in condition. The deficient practice affected one resident (Resident #34) of three reviewed for changes in condition. The facility census was 41. Findings Include: Review of the medical record for Resident #34 revealed an admission date on 06/13/24 and a discharge date on 09/27/24 with return to the facility expected. Medical diagnoses included abdominal aortic aneurysm without rupture, urinary tract infection (UTI), severe protein-calorie malnutrition, complication of surgical and medical care of abdominal wound, acute posthemorrhagic anemia, acute kidney failure, dysphagia, bacteremia, colostomy, peripheral vascular disease, and pressure ulcers of sacral region, buttock, and heel. Review of the resident profile for Resident #34 revealed the resident's girlfriend (Girlfriend #700) was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-09 · tag F0622 — isolatedNot transfer or discharge a resident without an adequate reason; and must provide documentation and convey specific information when a resident is transferred or discharged.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to provide written notice of transfer to a hospital to one resident (Resident #34) and/or the resident's representative. The deficient practice affected one resident (Resident #34) of three reviewed for transfer and discharge. The facility census was 41. Findings Include: Review of the medical record for Resident #34 revealed an admission date on 06/13/24 and a discharge date on 09/27/24 with return to the facility expected. Medical diagnoses included abdominal aortic aneurysm without rupture, urinary tract infection (UTI), severe protein-calorie malnutrition, complication of surgical and medical care of abdominal wound, acute posthemorrhagic anemia, acute kidney failure, dysphagia, bacteremia, colostomy, peripheral vascular disease, and pressure ulcers of sacral region, buttock, and heel. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #34 had intact cognition and scored 15 out…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-09 · tag F0623 — isolatedProvide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to provide a written notice of discharge to one resident (Resident #34) or the resident's representative prior to discharging the resident from the facility. The deficient practice affected one resident (Resident #34) of three reviewed for transfer and discharge. The facility census was 41. Findings Include: Review of the medical record for Resident #34 revealed an admission date on 06/13/24 and a discharge date on 09/27/24 with return to the facility expected. Medical diagnoses included abdominal aortic aneurysm without rupture, urinary tract infection (UTI), severe protein-calorie malnutrition, complication of surgical and medical care of abdominal wound, acute posthemorrhagic anemia, acute kidney failure, dysphagia, bacteremia, colostomy, peripheral vascular disease, and pressure ulcers of sacral region, buttock, and heel. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #34 had…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-09 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview the facility failed to ensure minimum data set (MDS) assessments were completed accurately. This affected one resident (Resident #22) out of nine residents reviewed for MDS assessments. The facility census was 41. Findings included: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #22 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included dementia, atrial fibrillation, chronic kidney disease stage three, hypothyroidism, type two diabetes mellitus, major depressive disorder, anxiety disorder, dysphagia, dysphagia, and muscle weakness. Review of the quarterly minimum data set (MDS) 3.0 dated 08/24/24 revealed Resident #22 is severely cognitively impaired. Resident #22 received antidepressant, diuretic, and hypoglycemic medications with indications noted. Resident #22 is receiving hospice care. Review of orders revealed Resident #22 was taking warfarin 2.5 milligrams (mg) once a day and the order was written on 08/01/24. Review of the August medication administration record…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-09 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure Resident #299 received timely treatment for a urinary tract infection. This affected one resident (#299) of 21 residents reviewed for medication administration. The facility census was 41. Findings include: Review of medical records for Resident #299 revealed and admission date of 09/16/24. Diagnoses include hemiplegia and hemiparesis following unspecified cerebrovascular disease affecting left non-dominant side, diabetes mellitus and hypertension. Review of Resident #299's progress noted revealed she complained of discomfort with urination on 09/21/24 and a urinalysis was ordered. Further review of the resident's medical record revealed the resident had a urine sample collected on 09/23/24 with a urinalysis and culture and sensitivity to be completed. The results of the urinalysis and culture and sensitivity were completed on 09/26/24. Review of the physician's orders revealed no order for an antibiotic to treat Resident #299's urinary tract infection until 10/02/24 at 4:20 P.M. An interview with Regional Support…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-09 · tag F0699 — isolatedProvide care or services that was trauma informed and/or culturally competent.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to ensure a resident with Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) was appropriately assessed to identify the cause of the residents PTSD and minimize triggers and/or re-traumatization. This affected one resident (#147) identified by the facility as having PTSD/trauma. The facility census was 41. Findings include: Record review for Resident #147 revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had diagnoses including PTSD, anxiety disorder, and depression. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 10/02/24, revealed an ongoing assessment that was not completed. Review of an assessment dated [DATE] for Resident #147 revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) assessment score of 15 out of 15. Review of the active care plans for Resident #147 revealed no plan of care was in place addressing the cause of PTSD, triggers which may cause re-traumatization, or interventions to reduce the risk of re-traumatization and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-09 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure two residents (Residents #20 and #98) were free from significant medication errors. The deficient practice affected two residents (Residents #20 and #98) of two reviewed for medication errors. The facility census was 41. Findings Include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #98 revealed an admission date on 09/13/24 and a discharge date on 10/02/24. Medical diagnoses included unspecified cirrhosis of the liver, celiac disease, chronic kidney disease, and charcot's joint for unspecified foot and ankle. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #98 had intact cognition and scored a 15 out of 15 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) assessment. Resident #98 received daily insulin injections. Review of the Medication Administration Record (MAR) dated September 2024 revealed Resident #98 had an order for Humulin N insulin (a long acting insulin that…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-09 · tag F0847 — isolatedInform resident or representatives choice to enter into binding arbitration agreement and right to refuse.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff and resident interview and review of facility arbitration agreement the facility failed to fully explain the arbitration agreement and the right to rescind the agreement within 30 days of signing. This affected two residents (#297 and #150) of three residents whose arbitration agreements were reviewed. The facility census was 41. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #297 revealed an admission date of 09/11/24. Diagnoses include fractures of the right fibula, muscular dystrophy, osteoarthritis, morbid obesity, depression and scoliosis. Review of the Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE] revealed the resident to be cognitively intact with a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 13 out of 15. Review of the form titled Trilogy Voluntary Binding Arbitration Agreement dated 09/16/24 revealed Resident #297 signed the form as agreeing to the facility's binding arbitration agreement on 09/19/24. The agreement stated that the resident had 30 days to revoke the agreement after…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-09 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) were followed during gastric-tube medication administration. This affected one resident (Resident #11) out of one resident observed for medication administration via a gastric - tube. The facility census was 41. Findings include: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #11 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included Parkinson's disease without dyskinesia, Dementia, acute respiratory disease, complication of indwelling urethral catheter, cardiomegaly, Schizophrenia, anxiety disorder, and cognitive communication deficit. Review of the quarterly minimum data set (MDS) 3.0 dated 08/26/24 revealed Resident #11 has severe cognitive impairment, is on a mechanically altered diet with a gastric feeding tube and urinary catheter in place. Resident #11 is on anticoagulant, antipsychotic, and opioid medications with indications in place. Resident #11 is on hospice care with isolation…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-08-07 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — widespreadProvide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, staffing schedule review, review of the facility assessment, and family, resident, and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure there was adequate staffing to provide activities of daily living (ADL) care for Residents #5, #12, #19, and #39. This affected four residents (#5, #12, #19, and #39) of seven residents reviewed for ADL care with the potential to affect all 46 residents. The facility census was 46. Findings include: 1. On 08/05/24 at 5:40 A.M., observation of staff revealed there were three licensed nurses, four State Tested Nursing Assistants (STNAs) and two STNAs in training on duty to provide care for 46 residents currently residing in the facility. The facility identified 15 residents that required assistance or were dependent on staff for feeding and 29 residents that required the assistance of two staff for toileting and transfers. 2. The following family and resident concerns were lodged during the investigation related to facility staffing. 2a.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-08-07 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — patternProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, family interview, resident interview, and staff interviews, the facility failed to provide residents that required assistance from staff with activity of daily living (ADL) with the care and services with nail hygiene and dressing. This affected four (Residents #5, #12, #19, and #39) of seven residents reviewed for ADL care. The facility census was 46. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #5 was admitted on [DATE]. Diagnoses included abdominal aortic aneurysm, gangrene bilateral toes, and peripheral vascular disease. Review of Resident #5's profile care guide revealed the care included showers scheduled Monday and Thursday on day shift and use of a mechanical lift with two staff assist for transfers. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #5 was cognitively intact and was dependent on staff for bathing. Review of the plan of care dated 07/03/24 revealed Resident #5 required staff assistance to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-03 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, resident and staff interviews, medical record review, review of shower sheets, and facility policy review, the facility failed to provide showers as scheduled for one resident (Resident #29). This affected one resident (Resident #29) of three reviewed for showers. The facility census was 46. Findings Include: Review of the medical record for Resident #29 revealed an admission date on 04/28/24. Medical diagnoses included hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction affecting left non-dominant side, chronic kidney disease stage III, adjustment disorder, depression, legal blindness, unsteadiness on feet, abnormalities of gait and mobility, and need for assistance with personal care. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #29 had intact cognition and scored 13 out of 15 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) assessment. The resident had impairments on both sides of both the upper and lower extremities. Resident #29…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-03 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview and facility policy review the facility failed to ensure residents were free from significant medication errors. This affected two residents (#8, #19) of three residents reviewed for medication errors. The facility census was 46. Findings Include: Review of Resident #8 revealed Resident #8 was admitted on [DATE] with the diagnoses including Alzheimer's Disease, depressive disorder, anxiety disorder, and high blood pressure. Resident #8 required extensive assistance from staff for activities of daily living (ADL) tasks including medication administration. Resident #8 had severely impaired cognition and was receiving hospice services for end stage Alzheimer's Disease. Review of Resident #8's progress notes dated 05/11/24 at 11:00 P.M. authored by the Director of Health Services (DHS) revealed Resident #8 had been administered the wrong medication. Resident #8 was assessed; vitals were stable and did not exhibit any adverse effects. Review of Resident #8's Interdisciplinary Team…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-03 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, medical record review, interview, and review of the manufacture guidelines the facility failed to ensure the glucometer was properly disinfected after use. This affected one resident (Resident #4) of five residents observed for medication administration. The facility census was 46. Findings include: Review of Resident #4's medical record revealed an admission date of 11/16/20 with diagnoses including type two diabetes mellitus, unspecified dementia, and anxiety. Resident #4 required assistance from staff to complete activities of daily living (ADL) tasks including obtaining blood glucose readings and medication administration. Review of Resident #4's physician orders dated 04/15/24 revealed an order to obtain blood glucose readings before meals and at bedtime. Observation on 06/27/24 at 7:45 A.M. revealed Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #200 was completing morning medication administration for Resident #4. LPN #200 removed the glucometer from a drawer in the medication cart and placed it on the top of the medication cart (the glucometer was stored loosely in the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-07-06 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — widespreadProvide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record, review, staffing schedule review, review of the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Census and Condition (CMS) Form 672, review of the facility assessment, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure there was adequate staffing to provide bathing for residents. This affected five residents (Residents #3, #23, #26, #87, and #187) of six residents reviewed for bathing with the potential to affect all 36 residents. The facility census was 36. Findings include: 1. On 07/03/23 at 7:30 A.M. three surveyors entered the facility to conduct an annual and complaint investigation. Observation revealed there were two licensed nurses, one licensed nurse in training, and three State Tested Nurse Aides (STNA's) on duty to proved care for 36 residents currently residing in the facility. Review of the facility completed Centers for Medicare and Medicaid (CMS) Census and Condition form 672 revealed the facility provided Activities of Daily Living (ADL) information for 37 residents. The ADL…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-07-06 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — patternProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record, review, review of the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Census and Condition (CMS) Form 672, policy review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure residents unable to carry out activities of daily living including bathing received the necessary services. This affected five residents (Residents #87, #187, #26, #3, and #23) of six residents reviewed for bathing. The facility census was 36 Findings include: Review of the facility completed Centers for Medicare and Medicaid (CMS) Census and Condition form 672 revealed the facility provided Activities of Daily Living (ADL) information for 37 residents. The ADL information revealed the facility identified 21 residents who required the assist of one or two staff for bathing and 16 residents that were dependent for bathing. 1. Review of medical record revealed Resident #87 was admitted on [DATE] and discharged on 06/03/23 with diagnoses that included but not limited to non-traumatic spinal cord dysfunction, atrial…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-07-06 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, medical record review, and policy review, the facility failed to notify the physician and families of significant weight changes for Residents #3 and #27. This affected two residents (#3 and #27) of four residents reviewed for nutrition. The facility census was 36. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #3 revealed an admission date of 04/03/20 with diagnoses including dysphagia, unspecified dementia, depression, type two diabetes, anxiety disorder, and feeding difficulties. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #3 was rarely or never understood. She lost weight and was not on a physician-prescribed weight loss plan. Review of Resident #3's weight history revealed she weighed 122.8 pounds on 11/09/22, 123.1 pounds on 12/09/22, 121.2 pounds on 01/19/23, 121 pounds on 02/18/23, 119.3 pounds on 03/03/23, 120.4 pounds on 03/09/23, and 109.6 pounds on 05/09/23. Her 05/09/23 weight was a 10.7% weight loss over 180 days.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-07-06 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolatedProvide activities to meet all resident's needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure activities were provided for one resident (#3). This affected one resident (#3) of two residents reviewed for activities. The facility census was 36. Findings include: Observation on 07/03/23 at 9:20 A.M. and 11:27 A.M. and on 07/05/23 at 9:05 A.M. and 3:41 P.M. revealed Resident #3's television was on but muted. Interview on 07/03/23 at 10:58 A.M. with Resident #3's daughter revealed she was concerned about her mother's activities. She reported they did not do activities with Resident #3, and nobody visited her. She reported she had been told Resident #3 gets 30 minutes of activities a week, but she had not seen it. Review of the medical record for Resident #3 revealed an admission date of 04/03/20 with diagnoses including dysphagia, unspecified dementia, depression, type two diabetes, anxiety disorder, and feeding difficulties. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #3 was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-07-06 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, medical record review, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure fall interventions were in place for one resident (#23) who was at risk for falling. This affected one resident (#23) of four reviewed for accidents. The facility census was 36. Findings include: Observation on 07/03/23 at 8:33 A.M., 9:32 A.M., 12:08 P.M., and 12:30 P.M. revealed Resident #23 in bed. No fall mats were observed. Interview on 07/03/23 with Certified Resident Care Associate (CRCA) #72 verified no fall mats were in place. Review of the medical record for Resident #23 revealed an admission date of 08/16/22 with diagnoses including unspecified dementia, anxiety disorder, depression, anorexia, and adult failure to thrive. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #23 was rarely or never understood. Review of the plan of care dated 08/29/22 revealed Resident #23 was at risk for falling related to impaired cognition, poor safety awareness,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-07-06 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure supplements were provided as ordered and weights were obtained as ordered for Residents #3 and Resident #23. This affected two residents (#3 and #23) of four reviewed for nutrition. The facility census was 36. Findings include: 1. Observation on 07/03/23 at 12:30 P.M. revealed Resident #23 did not have a magic cup on her lunch tray. This was verified by Certified Resident Care Associate (CRCA) #72 at that time who reported she would get the resident one after she was done eating. Review of the medical record for Resident #23 revealed an admission date of 08/16/22 with diagnoses including unspecified dementia, anxiety disorder, depression, anorexia, and adult failure to thrive. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #23 was rarely or never understood. She required the supervision of one person for eating. She had no weight indicated and was on a mechanically altered diet. Review…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-07-06 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolatedEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure pharmacy recommendations were followed for Resident #23. This affected one resident (#23) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The facility census was 36. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #23 revealed an admission date of 08/16/22 with diagnoses including unspecified dementia, anxiety disorder, depression, anorexia, and adult failure to thrive. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #23 was rarely or never understood. She received an antidepressant seven days during the look back period. Review of the pharmacy recommendation dated 08/23/22 revealed Resident #3 had orders for Depakote and as needed lorazepam, which could be used for multiple purposes. The pharmacist recommended specifying a reason for use and adding side effect monitoring. The physician agreed with all recommendations. Review of the pharmacist recommendation dated 10/19/22 revealed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-07-06 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure as needed psychotropics were limited to 14 days or that the physician documented a rationale for extending the use and provided a duration for use for Resident #9 and Resident #23 and failed to ensure a psychotropic had an indication of use for Resident #9. This affected two residents (#9 and #23) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The facility census was 36. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #23 revealed an admission date of 08/16/22 with diagnoses including unspecified dementia, anxiety disorder, depression, anorexia, and adult failure to thrive. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #23 was rarely or never understood. Review of Resident #23's physician order dated 12/01/22 revealed an order for Lorazepam 2.0 milligrams (mg) per milliliter (ml) 0.5 ml to be administered every four hours as needed for anxiety there was no end date specified.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
No federal fines in the current CMS record.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to TRILOGY HEALTH SERVICES — 123 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 3 of 5 | 4.2 | -1.2 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 2 of 5 | 3.5 | -1.5 vs chain |
| Staffing | 3 of 5 | 3.3 | -0.3 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 5 of 5 | 4.8 | +0.2 vs chain |
The other 122 homes this chain runs (chain average 4.2★, per CMS)
Showing 40 of 122; lowest-rated first.
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
CMS ownership filings flag an owner of this facility as a real-estate investment trust (REIT). That’s a fact worth knowing: peer-reviewed research links private-equity and REIT ownership to lower staffing and more citations on average — though any individual home can run well or poorly regardless. Read the inspection and staffing record above on its own merits.
- AMERICAN HEALTHCARE REIT INC — REIT · 100.00% share · 5% Or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest
- TRILOGY REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST — REIT · 100.00% share · 5% Or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest
Source: CMS SNF ownership filings (PECOS). These flags are self-reported and undercount — federal auditors (GAO) and researchers find CMS captures only a fraction of true private-equity and REIT ties, so the absence of a flag on other homes is not proof they lack investor owners. How investor ownership affects care →
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CONTINENTAL MERGER SUB LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 26% | since 12/30/2019 |
| BARNEY, LEIGH | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY | — | since 11/01/2019 |
| CONNER, GREGORY | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY | — | since 06/03/2021 |
| DAVIS, DAVID | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY | — | since 08/21/2017 |
| MCNAMARA, DONALD | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY | — | since 08/01/2024 |
| MEHAFFEY, TODD | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY | — | since 01/31/2022 |
| PIETROWSKI, CRISTINA | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 01/31/2022 |
| PROSKY, DANNY | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY | — | since 12/01/2015 |
| WILLHITE, GABRIEL | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY | — | since 08/15/2023 |
| TRILOGY MANAGEMENT SERVICES LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 12/30/2019 |
| CANOWITZ, STEPHEN | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 10/01/2025 |
| CORBIN, KATHY | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 11/01/2023 |
| FIGHTMASTER, LISA | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 11/01/2023 |
| GHERING, SETH | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 04/01/2024 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 17 rows in the source record cover these 14 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $1.2M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 11% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in OH
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Ohio Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 366475. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-04-30, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.