No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Creasy Springs Health Campus

1750 S Creasy Ln, Lafayette, IN 47905 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 71 certified beds · (765) 447-6600 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (765) 447-6600 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
1 actual-harm citation$8,018 in federal fines
Insights

The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.

In its favor
  • a high payroll-based staffing rating (4/5)
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • it has 1 actual-harm citation
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (33) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $8,018 in federal fines (most recent 2023-12-20)
  • its payroll- and facility-reported staffing and quality-measure scores sit well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

3/5
CMS overall
3 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 2 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 4 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 5 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's staffing and quality-measure ratings run 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself, and staffing on its payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★ 3/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
(765) 446-0000 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
2513 Maple Point Dr · (765) 447-8337 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
Pay Less0.4 mi
2513 Maple Point Dr · (765) 447-7533 · Call to confirm hours
Park
3630 McCarty Ln · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
1701 S Creasy Ln · (765) 502-4000

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 5 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 4 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 3 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating3★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased3.9%11.0%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight9.5%5.5%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%0.4%0.9%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.0%1.1%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms3.1%25.2%6.5%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.0%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury2.9%3.9%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened13.9%11.9%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication22.6%23.5%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine94.7%95.4%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers1.9%3.6%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control26.1%23.3%21.2%worse
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table10.6%13.6%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication1.3%1.2%1.4%typical
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine74.9%79.0%79.4%typical
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission24.0%22.2%22.6%typical
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit16.5%10.8%12.0%worse
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days1.001.611.67better
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days0.781.441.80better

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

69.4% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 263 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

69.4%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
9.6%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
80.7%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.42U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.26hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.10hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.06hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 80.7% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 140 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.42 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 72% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 14% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF69.4%CMS range 62.6–74.951.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024better than U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF9.6%CMS range 7.1–12.610.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge80.7%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge81.4%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge63.6%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting100.0%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened2.2%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization5.8%CMS range 3.9–8.87.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.031.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.89
RN hours/ resident / day
0.55
LPN hours/ resident / day
3.14
Aide hours/ resident / day
4.58
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.60
RN hoursweekends
43.5%
Total nursing turnover
43.8%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 71 beds and averages 64.2 residents a day — about 90% occupied, or roughly 7 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.58 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.89 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 3.14 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.95 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.83 on weekdays — 18% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.00 to 0.60 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 44% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

10
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-02-11)
12
at the previous standard inspection (2025-02-05)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

33 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 22 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Actual harm · Gcited before2023-12-20 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to hold insulin according to the physician ordered parameters for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for insulin administration. (Resident 29) Resident 29 had hypoglycemia which resulted in an emergency room visit and hospitalization. Finding includes: During an interview, on 12/14/23 at 10:36 a.m., RN 6 indicated Resident 29 became unresponsive, on 12/13/23 at 9:00 p.m., and was sent to the emergency room. The resident had a blood sugar of 18 (mg) milligram/(dL)deciliter (a normal fasting blood sugar level was between 70 mg/dL and 100 mg/dL). The record for Resident 29 was reviewed on 12/18/23 at 4:13 p.m. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, diabetes mellitus, congestive heart failure, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and hypertension. A care plan, dated 11/12/21, indicated the resident had a risk for hypoglycemia and hyperglycemia related to diabetes mellitus. The interventions included, but were not limited to, give medication per orders, monitor blood sugars per physician orders, and to observe for hypoglycemia such…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-02-11 · tag F0554 — isolated
    Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident was assessed to self-administer medications for 1 of 1 resident randomly reviewed for self-medication administration. (Resident 73)Findings include:During an observation, on 2/4/26 at 2:02 p.m., a clear plastic bag, labeled with prescription information containing Nystatin cream, was found on Resident 73's bedside table.The clinical record for Resident 73 was reviewed on 2/6/26 at 12:14 p.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, type 2 diabetes mellitus with skin complications, rash, and nonspecific skin eruptions.A physician's order, dated 12/22/25, indicated to administer Nystatin ointment topical to the areas of noted rash twice a day.A care plan, dated 1/29/26, indicated the resident had moisture associated skin damage (MASD) to the left buttock. Interventions included, but were not limited to, treatment as ordered.The clinical record did not contain an assessment or a physician's order completed by the interdisciplinary team to determine Resident 73 could self-administer…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-02-11 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the physician was notified of a weight gain according to the parameters ordered for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for notification. (Resident 9)Findings include:The clinical record for Resident 9 was reviewed on 2/6/26 at 1:24 p.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, congestive heart failure (CHF), edema, fluid overload, hypertensive chronic kidney disease, depression, and diabetes mellitus. A physician's order, dated 12/10/25 and discontinued on 1/5/26, indicated to notify the physician of a weight gain greater than 2 pounds in 24 hours or 5 pounds in one week. Resident 9 was to be weighed every day right after she got up, had voided, still in bedclothes, and before breakfast.A review of Resident 9's daily weights indicated the following:a. On 12/18/25, Resident 9 had a documented 3.2 pounds weight increase.b. On 12/23/25, Resident 9 had a documented 15.6 pounds weight increase.c. On 12/26/25, Resident 9 had a documented 15.2 pounds weight increase.d. On 12/29/25, Resident 9 had a documented 13 pounds…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-02-11 · tag F0628 — isolated
    Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the resident or resident's representative were given notification in writing of the facility bed hold policy for 2 of 3 residents reviewed for hospitalization. (Resident 11 and 3)Findings include:1. The clinical record for Resident 11 was reviewed on 2/8/26 at 11:04 a.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, pneumonia, sepsis, acute respiratory failure with hypoxia, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and chronic kidney disease stage 3. a. A nursing progress note, dated 6/21/25 at 7:58 a.m., indicated the resident was sent to emergency room for respiratory distress. A nursing progress note, dated 6/26/25 at 8:30 p.m., indicated the resident returned to the facility after a hospital stay for pneumonia. b. A nursing progress note, dated 9/28/35 at 4:24 a.m., indicated the resident was sent to the emergency room for evaluation of chest pain. A nursing progress note, dated 9/30/25 at 4:10 p.m., indicated the resident returned to the facility after a hospital stay for pneumonia and hyperkalemia (an elevated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-02-11 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment was coded accurately for 2 of 2 residents reviewed for MDS accuracy. (Resident 9 and 2)Findings include: 1. The clinical record for Resident 9 was reviewed on 2/6/26 at 1:24 p.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, congestive heart failure, edema, fluid overload, and hypertensive chronic kidney disease. A physician's order, dated 12/10/25, indicated to administer furosemide (a diuretic medication) 80 milligrams (mg) twice a day. During an interview, on 2/9/26 at 3:49 p.m., the MDS Coordinator indicated the congestive heart failure diagnosis was not included in the resident's quarterly MDS assessment on 12/12/25. 2. The clinical record for Resident 2 was reviewed 2/9/26 at 9:00 am. The diagnosis included, but were not limited to, dementia, depression, anxiety, and post-traumatic stress disorder. The clinical record review did not include post-traumatic stress disorder under Resident 2's diagnoses list. The social history observation, dated 1/26/26, indicated Resident 2…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-02-11 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure comprehensive person-centered care plans were developed and implemented for 2 of 2 residents reviewed for care plans. (Resident 9 and 2)Findings include:1. The clinical record for Resident 9 was reviewed on 2/6/26 at 1:24 p.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, congestive heart failure, edema, fluid overload, and hypertensive chronic kidney disease. A physician's order, dated 12/10/25, indicated to administer furosemide (a diuretic medication) 80 milligrams (mg) twice a day. A physician's order, dated 12/13/25, indicated to administer metolazone (a diuretic medication) 5 mg tablet daily. A comprehensive person-centered care plan related to congestive heart failure and the use of multiple diuretic medications was not initiated until 2/9/26, after the start of the survey. 2. The clinical record for Resident 2 was reviewed on 2/9/26 at 9:00 am. The diagnosis included, but were not limited to, dementia, depression, anxiety, and post-traumatic stress disorder. The social history observation, dated 1/26/26…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-11 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff administered medications as ordered and followed the physician ordered medication parameters for 2 of 2 residents reviewed for quality of care. (Resident 64 and 8)Findings include:1. The clinical record for Resident 64 was reviewed on 2/5/26 at 2:33 p.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, right distal femur fracture, depression, paraplegia, spinal cord injury, congestive heart failure, edema, fluid overload, hypertensive chronic kidney disease, depression, and dementia.A care plan, dated 9/16/25, indicated the resident had chronic pain. The interventions included, but were not limited to, administer medications and opioids as ordered.a. A physician's order, dated 10/11/25, indicated to administer two (2) capsules of pregabalin (a medication used to treat neuropathic pain) 50 milligrams three times a day. A controlled drug record indicated Resident 64 received one (1) capsule of pregabalin 50 mg on 10/11/25 at 1:15 p.m., and one (1) capsule on 10/13/25 at 8:30 a.m. Resident 64 should have received…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-11 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolated
    Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure an enteral feeding bag was labeled with the product name, date, and time for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for enteral feeding. (Resident 3)Findings include:During an observation, on 2/4/26 at 12:22 p.m., Resident 3 had two clear bags hanging on a feeding pump, which was turned off, and not connected to the resident. One bag was half full of a clear liquid without a label with the date, time or substance and the other bag was half full of a tan colored liquid without a label with the date, time or substance.During an interview, on 2/4/26 at 12:22 p.m., Registered Nurse 5 indicated the bags should have been labeled with a date, time, rate and what the substance was in the bag. During an interview, on 2/10/26 at 10:49 a.m., the Clinical Support Nurse indicated the enteral feeding bags should have had a label with the date, time and name of substance in bag.The clinical record for Resident 3 was reviewed on 2/10/26 11:24 a.m. The diagnoses…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-02-11 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — isolated
    Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the nursing staff administered medications in a safe and competent manner for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for competent nurse staffing. (Resident 64)Findings include:The clinical record for Resident 64 was reviewed on 2/5/26 at 2:33 p.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, right distal femur fracture, depression, paraplegia, spinal cord injury, congestive heart failure, edema, fluid overload, hypertensive chronic kidney disease, depression, and dementia.A care plan, dated 9/16/25, indicated the resident had chronic pain. The interventions included, but were not limited to, administer medications and opioids as ordered.A nursing progress note, dated 10/11/25 at 6:29 a.m., indicated Resident 64 refused to take his evening medications. RN 8 offered the resident the medication prepared by the evening shift nurse at 12:30 a.m. The resident indicated he would take the medication prepared by the previous nurse. The morning dose of morphine was not given due to being too close to the previous dose.A controlled…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-11 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure enhanced barrier precaution infection control practices were implemented and followed for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for infection control. (Resident 3)Findings include:The clinical record for Resident 3 was reviewed on 2/10/26 at 11:24 a.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, gastrostomy status and irritable bowel syndrome.A care plan, dated 12/12/25, indicated Resident 3 required enhanced barrier precautions (EBP) during high contact care related to the presence of a feeding tube. Interventions included, but were not limited to, utilize a gown and gloves according to the enhanced barrier precautions policy.A physician's order, dated 1/7/26, indicated Resident 3 required enhanced barrier precautions due to the gastrostomy tube.During an observation, on 2/4/26 at 12:22 p.m., no personal protective equipment (PPE) was placed outside or inside Resident 3's room and an enhanced barrier precautions (EBP) sign was not displayed inside or outside Resident 3's room or on the door.During an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-02-11 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — isolated
    Make sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a call light was accessible to a resident while at her bathroom sink for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for call light accessibility. (Resident 4)Findings include:During an interview, on 2/5/26 at 12:30 p.m., Resident 4 indicated she could not reach her call light while she was sitting at the sink in her wheelchair. She indicated the staff positioned her at the sink to finish her personal hygiene and would leave the room. Her right arm was weakened due to a stroke, and the call light was on her right side and out of reach when she sat at the sink. Due to her arm weakness, she could not maneuver her wheelchair away from the sink.The clinical record for Resident 4 was reviewed on 2/6/26 at 11:16 a.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, hemiplegia and hemiparesis following a cerebral infarction affecting the right dominant side, muscle wasting and atrophy, lack of coordination, and weakness.A care plan, dated 10/22/25, indicated Resident 4 was at risk for falling related to weakness, incontinence,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 22 citations
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-30 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure medications were transcribed correctly upon admission for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for significant medication errors. (Resident B)Findings include: During an interview, on 9/29/25 at 12:37 p.m., Resident B's family member indicated, on 8/16/25, she witnessed a staff member attempting to administer her husband medication he had never received before. The staff member called the physician and did not administer the medication. A staff member informed her, on 8/18/25, Resident B had received the wrong medications on 8/15/25, 8/16/25, 8/17/25 and 8/18/25. The Director of Health Services (DHS) informed her the facility was monitoring Resident B for reactions related to receiving the wrong medications. Resident B's family was very upset with the nursing staff and was more distressed to see the same nurses still working and administering Resident B's medications. She had told the administration staff about her concerns, and nothing was done. Resident B was at home now and was doing okay. She wanted the facility to prevent…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-09 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident with a diagnosis of dementia, who resided in the secured locked unit, was not allowed to leave the facility unsupervised for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for elopement. (Resident B) The deficient practice was corrected on 8/25/25, prior to the start of the survey, and was therefore past noncompliance.Findings include:The clinical record for Resident B was reviewed on 9/8/25 at 2:58 p.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, dementia and Alzheimer's disease.Resident B admitted to the facility on [DATE] at 11:21 a.m.An admission assessment, dated 8/22/25 at 11:24 a.m., indicated Resident B was not exit seeking, had no history of elopement, and ambulated without assistive devices. In a facility documented interview, dated 8/22/25, CNA 5 indicated she heard the door alarm and had directed CNA 2 to check the alarm.In a facility documented interview, dated 8/22/25, CNA 2 indicated she heard the door alarm on 8/22/25 at 6:30 p.m. She…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Potential for harm · D2025-02-05 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident was treated with respect and dignity by a staff member during meal service for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for dignity. (Resident 26) Findings include: During an observation, on 1/30/25 at 12:10 p.m., Resident 26 was sitting in his wheelchair in the dining room. Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) 9 was standing on Resident 26's left side as she assisted him with feeding. CNA 9 remained standing for the entirety of the meal. The clinical record for Resident 26 was reviewed on 2/4/25 at 10:27 a.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, Alzheimer's, hypertensive, anxiety disorder, tachycardia, dementia, and acute kidney failure. A care plan, dated 12/27/24, indicated the resident had experienced significant weight loss. The interventions included, but were not limited to, offer the resident encouragement and assistance with eating and report difficulties swallowing. During an interview, on 1/30/25 at 12:19 p.m., CNA 2 indicated she would sometime stand up and walk around feeding multiple…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-02-05 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to promptly implement a do not resuscitate (DNR) order based on a resident's signed advance directive wishes for 2 of 3 residents reviewed for advance directives. (Resident 152 and 160) Findings include: 1. The clinical record for Resident 152 was reviewed on 2/4/25 at 2:31 p.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, cerebral infarction, metabolic encephalopathy, Alzheimer's disease, pneumonia, atrial fibrillation, hypertensive heart and chronic kidney disease with heart failure, and chronic diastolic (congestive) heart failure. An Indiana advance directive form, signed on 1/13/25, indicated the resident wished to not have life prolonging measures. An Indiana Physician Orders for Scope of Treatment (POST) form, signed on 1/13/25, indicated the resident chose to be a DNR. A physician's order, dated 1/23/25 at 2:32 p.m., indicated full code status. A State of Indiana Out of Hospital Do Not Resuscitate Declaration and Order form, signed on 1/23/25, indicated the resident was to be a DNR upon admission to the facility…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-02-05 · tag F0644 — isolated
    Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a revised Preadmission Screen and Resident Review (PASARR) level I was submitted to reflect a resident's current diagnoses and medications for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for PASARR. (Resident 32) Findings include: The clinical record for Resident 32 was reviewed on 2/4/25 at 11:05 a.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, anxiety, depression, and adjustment disorder with mixed anxiety and depressed mood. A PASARR level I, dated 1/7/25, indicated no mental health diagnoses were known, or suspected and no mental health medications were being prescribed. A physician's order, dated 1/6/25, indicated to give trazodone (an antidepressant medication) 50 milligram (mg) daily. A physician's order, dated 1/7/25, indicated to give sertraline (an antidepressant medication) 25 mg daily. A physician's order, dated 1/7/25, indicated to give buspirone (an anxiety medication) 5 mg daily. There was no PASARR level I completed to reflect the resident's orders for sertraline, trazodone, and buspirone and the resident's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-05 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure medications were held according to the physician's ordered parameters for 1 of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. (Resident 4) Findings include: The clinical record for Resident 4 was reviewed on 2/4/25 at 10:31 a.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, essential primary hypertension, hypertensive chronic kidney disease with stage 1 through stage 4 chronic kidney disease, and type 2 diabetes mellitus. A physician's order, dated 4/11/23, indicated to give lisinopril (a blood pressure medication) 20 milligrams (mg) daily with special instructions to hold the medication for a systolic blood pressure less than 110. A Medication Administration Record (MAR), dated 7/1/24 through 7/31/24, indicated lisinopril was administered on 7/7/24 with a systolic blood pressure of 105 and on 7/14/24 with a systolic blood pressure of 102. A MAR, dated 8/1/24 through 8/31/24, indicated lisinopril was administered on 8/15/24 with a systolic blood pressure of 102 and on 8/26/24 with a systolic blood pressure of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-02-05 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a physician's order was obtained for the administration of oxygen for 2 of 4 residents reviewed for respiratory care. (Resident 150 and 156) Findings include: 1. During an observation, on 1/30/25 at 10:20 a.m., the resident was sitting in the chair in his room wearing 2 liters of oxygen via nasal cannula. He indicated he had been wearing oxygen yesterday and all during the night. The clinical record for Resident 150 was reviewed on 1/31/25 at 2:30 p.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, pulmonary fibrosis, metabolic encephalopathy, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, atelectasis, hypertensive heart and chronic kidney disease with heart failure, pulmonary hypertension, atrial fibrillation, and peripheral vascular disease. A vital signs report, dated 1/27/25 through 1/31/25, indicated the resident was on 1.5 liters of oxygen on 1/30/25 at 2:51 a.m. and on 2 liters of oxygen at 8:49 a.m. A current care plan, dated 1/28/25, indicated the resident had shortness of breath related to pulmonary…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-02-05 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure an order to give Augmentin 500 milligrams (mg) was discontinued when a new order to give Augmentin 875 mg was received which resulted in double doses of the antibiotic for pneumonia for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for antibiotics. (Resident 156) Findings include: During an interview, on 1/31/25 at 10:32 a.m., the resident indicated she had been sick and coughing with pneumonia. The clinical record for Resident 156 was reviewed on 1/31/25 at 2:27 p.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction affecting left non-dominant side, facial weakness, type 2 diabetes mellitus with hyperglycemia, hypertensive heart and chronic kidney disease with heart failure, congestive heart failure, non-ST elevation myocardial (NSTEMI), and asthma. A lab report, dated 1/21/25, indicated the resident's GFR (glomerular filtration rate: a blood test to measure kidney function) was low at 24. The normal range was greater than 60. A physician's order, dated 1/24/25, indicated to give…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-02-05 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure compromised controlled substance medications were disposed of and unopened insulin was stored in the refrigerator for 2 of 2 medication carts (200 hall and 300 hall) and to ensure supplies were not stored under the sink in a medication room for 1 of 2 medication rooms reviewed for medication storage. (the 200-medication room) Findings include: 1. During an observation, on [DATE] at 1:18 p.m., the 200-hall medication cart had a compromised controlled substance card of lorazepam (for anxiety) 0.5 milligrams (mg) for Resident 26 with the 8 and 16 slots taped on the back of the card. The clinical record for Resident 26 was reviewed on [DATE] at 10:27 a.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, Alzheimer's, hypertensive, anxiety disorder, tachycardia, dementia, and acute kidney failure. The medication card indicated the lorazepam 0.5 mg tablets had expired on [DATE]. There was no current order for the lorazepam 0.5 mg tablets…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-02-05 · tag F0808 — failed to follow doctor-ordered diets — isolated
    Ensure therapeutic diets are prescribed by the attending physician and may be delegated to a registered or licensed dietitian, to the extent allowed by State law.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to accurately initiate the correct diet orders upon admission and to provide a lunch tray in the correct consistency for 2 of 6 residents reviewed for dining. (Resident 151 and 156). Findings include: 1. During an observation, on 1/30/25 at 11:43 a.m., Resident 151 was sitting at a table in the dining room waiting for her lunch. The Administrator entered the dining room carrying the resident's plate and placed it in front of the resident with the chicken tenders facing her. The meal ticket indicated to serve a regular consistency diet, and the plate had 2 large whole chicken tenders, fries, and a piece of blueberry pie with regular crust. The resident grabbed a fry and began eating it. CNA 2 was assisting the resident with getting her fork when the cook brought out another piece of pie. The Speech Therapist looked over and told them Resident 151 was on a mechanical soft diet. The cook took the extra piece of pie with him and exited the dining…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-05 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff wore gloves when touching a resident's medication for 1 of 1 resident randomly observed for infection control. (Resident 31) Findings include: During an observation, on 1/31/25 at 10:40 a.m., QMA 3 brought a pain pill in for the resident along with his morning pills in a small medication cup. The resident indicated he did not want his morning pills until he had food, but he did want to take the pain pill. QMA 3 then picked the pain pill out of the other pills without donning gloves and handed it to Resident 31. The resident attempted to put the pill into his mouth but dropped it onto his shirt. QMA 3 picked the pill up off the resident's shirt and placed it in his mouth without gloves. The clinical record for Resident 31 was reviewed on 2/4/25 at 9:06 a.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, end stage renal disease, chronic diastolic (congestive) heart failure, hypertensive heart and chronic kidney disease, end stage renal disease, and dependence on renal dialysis. A physician's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-05 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — isolated
    Implement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the antibiotic stewardship program included a system to monitor duplicate dosing antibiotic use for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for antibiotic stewardship. (Resident 156) Findings include: During an interview, on 1/31/25 at 10:32 a.m., Resident 156 indicated she had been sick and coughing with pneumonia The clinical record for Resident 156 was reviewed on 1/31/25 at 2:27 p.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction affecting left non-dominant side, facial weakness, type 2 diabetes mellitus, hypertensive heart and chronic kidney disease with heart failure, acute systolic congestive heart failure, chronic kidney disease, non-ST elevation myocardial (NSTEMI), and asthma. A lab report, dated 1/21/25, indicated the resident's GFR (glomerular filtration rate: a blood test to measure kidney function) was low at 24. The normal range was greater than 60. A nursing progress note, dated 1/24/25 at 12:30 p.m., indicated the resident had nausea, vomiting, head…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-02-05 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide an influenza vaccination during the current influenza season when requested with a signed consent form for 1 of 5 residents reviewed for immunizations. (Resident 13) Findings include: The clinical record for Resident 13 was reviewed on 2/3/25 at 3:40 p.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, type 2 diabetes mellitus with diabetic chronic kidney disease, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, chronic respiratory failure with hypercapnia, morbid (severe) obesity due to excess calories, Alzheimer's disease, bacterial pneumonia, atrial fibrillation, shortness of breath, dysphagia, and dependence on supplemental oxygen. An influenza vaccination consent form, dated 1/2/24 at 3:50 p.m., was signed by Resident 13 at 3:57 p.m. requesting the influenza immunization. A vaccination record for the resident, received from the Clinical Support Nurse on 2/4/25 at 9:00 a.m., indicated the resident received an influenza vaccine on 10/4/24 at 1:40 a.m. During an interview, on 2/4/25 at 11:00 a.m., the Clinical Support…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-02-05 · tag F0887 — isolated
    Educate residents and staff on COVID-19 vaccination, offer the COVID-19 vaccine to eligible residents and staff after education, and properly document each resident and staff member's vaccination status.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide a Covid-19 vaccination when requested with a signed consent form for 1 of 5 residents reviewed for immunizations. (Resident 13) Findings include: The clinical record for Resident 13 was reviewed on 2/3/25 at 3:40 p.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, type 2 diabetes mellitus with diabetic chronic kidney disease, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, chronic respiratory failure with hypercapnia, morbid (severe) obesity due to excess calories, Alzheimer's disease, bacterial pneumonia, atrial fibrillation, shortness of breath, dysphagia, and dependence on supplemental oxygen. A Covid-19 vaccination consent form, dated 1/2/24 at 3:50 p.m., was signed by Resident 13 at 3:57 p.m. requesting the Covid-19 immunization. A vaccination record for the resident, received from the Clinical Support Nurse on 2/4/25 at 9:00 a.m., indicated the resident received a Covid-19 vaccine on 10/4/24 at 1:40 a.m. During an interview, on 2/4/25 at 11:00 a.m., the Clinical Support Nurse indicated the resident's medical record…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-12-20 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident with a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) which showed intact cognition was invited to participate in the care plan meetings for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for care plan meetings. (Resident 57) Finding includes: During an interview, on 12/13/23 at 3:41 p.m., Resident 57 indicated she was not aware of care plan meetings. The record for Resident 57 was reviewed on 12/18/23 at 3:41 p.m. Diagnosis included, but were not limited to, bipolar II disorder, frontotemporal neurocognitive disorder, anxiety, and degenerative disease of the basal ganglia. A Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 7/28/23, indicated the resident had a BIMS score of 14 which indicated intact cognition. A Resident First Meeting (care plan meeting), dated 7/27/23 at 5:32 p.m., indicated the resident's representative attended the meeting. The attendees included the Social Services Director (SSD), Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN), the facility Administrator, the Assistant Director of Health Services (ADHS) and the resident's spouse. The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-12-20 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolated
    Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident who was on the memory care unit was provided with preferred activities while in isolation for Covid-19 for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for activities. (Resident 59) Finding includes: During an observation, on 12/13/23 at 1:09 p.m., staff were in the room to assist the resident. He was sitting up in his wheelchair. There was no reading material, no television on, and no music playing in the room. During an observation, on 12/14/23 at 11:30 a.m., the resident was sitting up in his room on the side of the bed. The television was not on, there was no music playing, and no books or other activity material observed in the room. During an observation, on 12/14/23 at 12:30 p.m., QMA 11 went into the resident's room, she indicated he did not watch the television, did not listen to music, usually just sat in his wheelchair in the room, and did not participate in any activities. During an interview, on 12/14/23 at 2:22 p.m., the resident's daughter indicated he used to watch old westerns on television and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-20 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to keep a cognitively impaired resident safe from elopement for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for elopement. (Resident 118) This deficient practice was corrected on 11/24/23, prior to the start of the survey, and was therefore past noncompliance. Finding includes: The record for Resident 118 was reviewed on 12/14/23 at 10:27 a.m. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, metabolic encephalopathy, atherosclerotic heart disease, abdominal aortic aneurysm, unspecified dementia, and dysphagia (difficulty swallowing). A Facility Reported Incident (FRI), dated 11/13/23 at 4:51 p.m., indicated the resident exited the campus and was seen sitting in the grass outside the campus door. A progress note, dated 11/13/23 at 5:15 p.m., indicated at approximately 4:51 p.m., the Executive Director (ED) was notified the resident was outside of the Legacy Unit and was laying in the grass. The resident indicated she was just resting in the yard. The resident showed no signs of pain or discomfort. A progress note, dated 11/13/23 at 5:45 p.m.,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Potential for harm · D2023-12-20 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to reweigh a resident with a weight loss and to notify the provider of a weight loss for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for nutrition. (Resident 55) Finding includes: The record for Resident 55 was reviewed on 12/18/23 at 11:03 a.m. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, unspecified dementia, chronic kidney disease stage 3, age related physical debility, and altered mental status. A weight log indicated the following weights: a. On 8/5/23, the weight was 207.2 pounds. b. On 8/14/23, the weight was 212.6 pounds. c. On 8/21/23, the weight was 209 pounds. d. On 8/28/23, the weight was 199.2 pounds. There was a 6.3% weight loss from 8/21/23 to 8/28/23 (14 days). During an interview, on 12/19/23 at 10:57 a.m., the Clinical Support Nurse indicated their Electronic Health Record (EHR) did not trigger for a significant weight loss. There should have been a reweight completed to confirm the resident's weight. During an interview, on 12/19/23 at 2:23 p.m., the Clinical Support Nurse indicated there was no provider notification about…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-20 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolated
    Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to clear a clogged feeding tube (gastric tube) using an approved procedure for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for feeding tubes. (Resident 18) Finding includes: The record for Resident 18 was reviewed on 12/14/23 at 5:10 p.m. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, unspecified protein-calorie malnutrition, dysphagia, oropharyngeal phase, and artificial openings of gastrointestinal tract status. A progress note, dated 11/27/23 at 12:33 p.m., indicated the resident had a clogged feeding tube (gastric tube). The nurse tried coke (soda) to unclog the feeding tube after another nurse tried, without success. The nurse received an order to send the resident to the emergency room. There was no physician's order to use coke to unclog the feeding tube. During an interview, on 12/20/23 at 5:06 p.m., the Clinical Support Nurse indicated the policy did not include to put coke in the feeding tube to unclog it. A current policy, titled Administering Gastric/Jejunostomy Tube Medications, dated as reviewed 12/31/23 and received from the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-12-20 · tag F0790 — failed to provide dental care — isolated
    Provide routine and 24-hour emergency dental care for each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to accurately assess a resident's mouth for teeth and dentures and to show documentation of the dental status and the need for a dental appointment had been documented for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for dental. (Resident 59) Finding includes: During an interview, on 12/14/23 at 2:28 p.m., the resident's daughter indicated the resident's dentures did not fit well and the staff indicated the dentist would come to the facility. The resident did not chew well because of the fit of the dentures. The record for Resident 59 was reviewed on 12/14/23 at 5:04 p.m. Diagnosis included, but were not limited to, old myocardial infarction, osteoarthritis, hearing loss, age related cataracts, and a history of malignant neoplasm of the large intestine. A physician's order, dated 9/29/23, indicated the resident may see the dentist as needed. An admission observation, dated 9/29/23 at 5:53 p.m., indicated the resident had full dentures which included upper and lower dentures. A care plan, dated 10/12/23, indicated the resident was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-20 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the staff failed to wear the required PPE (Personal Protective Equipment) into an isolation room and to follow the PPE protocol for 1 of 4 hallways reviewed for transmission-based precautions (the Legacy hallway) and to ensure a catheter bag was not touching the ground for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for urinary catheter. (Resident 269) Findings include: 1a. During an observation, on 12/13/23 at 1:03 p.m., LPN 13 had on a N95 mask and put a face shield over the mask. She entered Resident 59's room to provide care. When LPN 13 came out of Resident 59's room, she took off her face shield and did not remove the N95 mask. She wore the same N95 into the hallway. During an interview, on 12/13/23 at 1:22 p.m., LPN 13 indicated she should have removed her N95 mask when leaving the resident's room. 1b. During an observation, on 12/19/23 at 2:43 p.m., CRCA 5 and CRCA 6 entered an isolation room on the Legacy unit. Both wore a surgical mask with face shield, and both were not wearing N95 masks. During an interview, on 12/19/23 at 2:44 p.m., LPN…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-20 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — isolated
    Implement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow an antibiotic stewardship program which included antibiotic use protocols and a system to monitor antibiotic use for 6 of 12 months reviewed for antibiotic stewardship. (July 2023-December 2023) Findings include: During a record review, on 12/20/23 at 2:45 p.m., the Antibiotic Stewardship binder had antibiotic monitoring starting January 2023 to June 2023. There was no documentation, tracking of infections, and antibiotic monitoring from July 2023 to December 2023. During an interview, on 12/20/23 at 2:45 p.m., the Clinical Support Nurse indicated the Infection Preventionist (IP) would make sure the antibiotics were monitored and met the McGeer (an infection surveillance for long-term care facilities) criteria. The IP would map the trends of infections and depending on the infections the facility would in-service staff. During an interview, on 12/20/23 at 2:53 p.m., the Clinical Support Nurse indicated the Antibiotic Stewardship binder did not contain information of tracking infections past June 2023. A current…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$8,018 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

  • $8,018 — penalty dated 2023-12-20

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to TRILOGY HEALTH SERVICES — 123 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 3 of 54.2-1.2 vs chain
Health inspection 2 of 53.5-1.5 vs chain
Staffing 4 of 53.3+0.7 vs chain
Quality measures 5 of 54.8+0.2 vs chain
The other 122 homes this chain runs (chain average 4.2★, per CMS)
1 of 5Heritage TheFindlay, OH 1 of 5The Oaks Rehabilitation and Healthcare CenterZanesville, OH 2 of 5Homewood Health CampusLebanon, IN 2 of 5Violet Springs Health CampusPickerington, OH 2 of 5Woodmont Health CampusBoonville, IN 3 of 5Cobblestone Crossings Health CampusTerre Haute, IN 3 of 5Cumberland Pointe Health CampusWest Lafayette, IN 3 of 5Forest Park Health CampusRichmond, IN 3 of 5Franciscan Health Care CenterLouisville, KY 3 of 5Greenleaf Health CampusElkhart, IN 3 of 5River Terrace Health CampusMadison, IN 3 of 5Scenic Hills At The MonasteryFerdinand, IN 3 of 5Smiths Mill Health CampusNew Albany, OH 3 of 5Springhurst Health CampusGreenfield, IN 3 of 5Springs Of Richmond, TheRichmond, IN 3 of 5St Mary Healthcare CenterLafayette, IN 3 of 5Stonegate Health CampusLapeer, MI 3 of 5Sun Prairie Senior LivingSun Prairie, WI 3 of 5Taylor Springs Health CampusGahanna, OH 3 of 5The Willows at Fritz FarmLexington, KY 3 of 5The Willows at HamburgLexington, KY 3 of 5The Willows at HarrodsburgHarrodsburg, KY 3 of 5The Willows at SpringhurstLouisville, KY 3 of 5Villages At Oak Ridge, TheWashington, IN 3 of 5Waunakee Valley Senior LivingWaunakee, WI 3 of 5Wellbrooke Of CarmelCarmel, IN 4 of 5Arlington Place Health CampusIndianapolis, IN 4 of 5Ashford Place Health CampusShelbyville, IN 4 of 5Aspen Place Health CampusGreensburg, IN 4 of 5Avalon Springs Health CampusValparaiso, IN 4 of 5Bethany Pointe Health CampusAnderson, IN 4 of 5Blair Ridge Health CampusPeru, IN 4 of 5Bridgepointe Health CampusVincennes, IN 4 of 5Cedar Creek Health CampusLowell, IN 4 of 5Clearvista Lake Health CampusIndianapolis, IN 4 of 5Forest Springs Health CampusLouisville, KY 4 of 5Glen Oaks Health CampusNew Castle, IN 4 of 5Glen Ridge Health CampusLouisville, KY 4 of 5Meadows Of Delphos TheDelphos, OH 4 of 5Meadows Of Ottawa TheOttawa, OH

Showing 40 of 122; lowest-rated first.

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
HANCOCK REGIONAL HOSPITALOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST100%since 12/01/2014
ORIX REAL ESTATE CAPITAL LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER MORTGAGE INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2023
BOND, MARIAIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; TRUSTEE OF THE SNFsince 07/01/2021
CLARK, TIMOTHYIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; TRUSTEE OF THE SNFsince 05/01/2015
DAUGHERTY, JOSHUAIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; TRUSTEE OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2020
FELKER, DEANIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; TRUSTEE OF THE SNFsince 05/01/2015
JOYNER, SARAIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; TRUSTEE OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2022
LONG, STEVENIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 06/13/2022
WILLARD, LACEYIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; TRUSTEE OF THE SNFsince 07/01/2022
WILSON, ROYIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; TRUSTEE OF THE SNFsince 05/01/2015
TRILOGY HEALTHCARE OF LAFAYETTE LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 12/01/2014
CZALBOWSKI, BRANDONIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 06/09/2024
THOMAS, JOHNIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 04/15/2025
BARNEY, LEIGHIndividualINDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNFsince 06/27/2025
DAVIS, DAVIDIndividualINDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNFsince 07/01/2025
AMERICAN HEALTHCARE REIT HOLDINGS LPOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 12/01/2015
AMERICAN HEALTHCARE REIT INCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 10/01/2018
GAHC3 TRILOGY JV LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 12/01/2015
GAHC4 TRILOGY JV LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 10/01/2018
PARAGON OUTPATIENT REHABILITATION SERVICES LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 12/01/2015
TRILOGY HEALTH SERVICES LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 12/01/2015
TRILOGY HEALTHCARE MASTER TENANT V, LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 06/27/2025
TRILOGY HEALTHCARE OF TIPPECANOE II, LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 12/01/2015
TRILOGY INVESTORS LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 12/01/2015
TRILOGY MANAGEMENT SERVICES LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 12/01/2015
TRILOGY PROPCO FINANCE LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 12/01/2015
TRILOGY PROPERTY HOLDINGS LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 12/01/2015
TRILOGY REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUSTOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 12/01/2015
TRILOGY REIT HOLDINGS LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 12/01/2015

CMS files one row per role, so the 40 rows in the source record cover these 29 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

17 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$14.7M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
+13.3%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$1.8M
Related-party expense14% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 19%Medicare 17%Other / private 64%

This home reported $1.8M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 14% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$330per resident / day
operating cost
$10,041per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$381per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in IN

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Indiana Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Indiana
$8,943/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$10,326/mo
Nursing home (private)
$5,639/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 155777. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-02-11, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next