River Terrace Health Campus

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

68.9% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 206 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 81.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 95 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.49 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 80% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 11% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 57 beds and averages 41.9 residents a day — about 74% occupied, or roughly 15 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.38 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 1.45 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.61 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.69 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.66 on weekdays — 21% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 1.71 to 0.83 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 48% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

20 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 9 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · G2023-09-27 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
  Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff irrigated a resident's (Resident B) Indwelling catheter with the correct dosage of acetic acid which resulted in burning pain and a transfer to the emergency department for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for Indwelling catheters. Findings include: During an interview on 9/27/23 at 2:40 p.m., Resident B was observed resting in bed with her eyes open. She indicated RN 2 came in her room and asked if the stuff for her catheter was in her room and Resident B told her no. A few minutes later, RN 2 came in her room with a big jug and said she had gotten some vinegar to irrigate her catheter. As soon as the vinegar hit up in there, she told RN 2 to stop because it was screaming burning. RN 2 replaced her catheter and then flushed it with normal saline. She ended up going to the emergency department (ED) due to the pain she had in her bladder. While at the ED, the physician explained to her that she had a chemical burn and that he needed to remove her catheter so he could insert lidocane (used for pain) gel.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Potential for harm · F2026-03-06 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the kitchen was clean and in good repair for 2 of 2 observations. This deficient practice had the potential to affect 44 of 44 residents who received meals from the kitchen.Findings include:During the initial tour of the kitchen on 3/2/26 at 10:20 a.m., the following concerns were observed:Under the right long rack and center rack, next to the wall in the walk-in freezer, there were a handful of frozen french fries on the floor.The outside of the six white bins holding sugar, oatmeal, thickener, bread flour, bread crumbs, and all purpose flour, had brown dirt and streaks going down the front, back and sides of the bins.The inside shelf of the deep fryer had a moderate amount of yellow crumbs on the inside shelf above the oil. Around the outside front, and both sides of the fryer had heavy grease streaks which ran the length of the fryer.The left oven had a moderate build-up of orange brown spills on the inside bottom and oven door.The inside of the hot box (where the cooks put the hot items they have…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-03-06 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
  Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the medical provider addressed the consultant pharmacist's recommendations for 2 of 45 residents reviewed for Drug Regimen Review. (Residents 36 and 44)Findings include:1.The record for Resident 36 was reviewed on 3/3/26 at 1:50 p.m., The resident's diagnoses included, but were not limited to, Alzheimer's disease with late onset (a progressive irreversible neurological disorder that destroys memory, thinking skills, and eventually the inability to perform simple tasks); major depressive disorder ( a serious mental health condition characterized by at least 2 weeks of persistent severe sadness, loss of interest, and fatigue, which significantly disrupt daily life); hallucinations (seeing, hearing, smelling feeling things that seem real but are created by the mind without external stimuli) and tremors (an involuntary quivering moment). The Consultant Pharmacist Review, dated 2/9/26, indicated the resident was admitted on [DATE] with a…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2025-03-28 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — widespread
  Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure the facility was staffed to provide adequate care for the residents related to toileting and as needed pain medication. This deficient practice had the potential to affect 41 of 41 residents residing in the facility. Findings include: An observation of the 2nd floor 200 Hallways, on 3/26/25 at 7:08 p.m., indicated no staff were observed on the right-side Hallway of the 2nd floor. On the right-side Hallway of the 2nd floor five call lights were alarming, Resident H was lying on the floor in her room between her wheelchair and the bathroom doorway. The resident was yelling for help, and no staff were insight or within hearing distance. A staff member was located at 7:09 p.m. and notified of the resident lying on the floor yelling for help. The resident indicated to Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) 3 she had fallen and needed help. During an interview and observation, on 3/26/25 at 7:12 p.m., Resident C was sitting in her bed. The resident had a nasal canula with oxygen being administered. CNA 3 indicated…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-03-28 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — pattern
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide activities of daily living (ADL) related to incontence care and personal assistance for 4 of 5 residents reviewed for ADL care. (Residents E, D, G, and C) Findings include: 1. During an interview, on 3/26/25 at 8:03 p.m., Resident E indicated she had turned her call light on for assistance to go to the bathroom and the Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) indicated she was the only one on the floor and could not help her. The resident was advised the facility did not have a walker or wheelchair for her to use at that time. After waiting over an hour the resident contacted her family member at home. The resident's family member indicated the resident called him and asked him to come and get her help. The clinical record for Resident E was reviewed on 03/28/25 at 11:07 a.m. The resident's diagnoses included, but were not limited to, femur fracture, Type 2 diabetes mellitus, diverticulosis, and hypertension. During a confidential interview, from 3/26/25 through 3/28/25, Staff 12 indicated it was very hard to care for the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-28 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
  Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident's pain medication was administered timely after being requested for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for pain management. (Resident F) Findings Include: During an interview on 3/26/25 at 7:47 p.m., Resident F indicated he had waited for hours to receive pain pills, and it was the worst on evening shift. Once the pain increased so high it was hard for the medication to get control of the pain. The clinical record for Resident F was reviewed on 3/26/25 at 11:00 p.m., The resident's diagnoses included, but were not limited to, right femur fracture, chronic kidney disease, Type 2 diabetes mellitus, and anemia. The Nursing Progress note, dated 3/22/25 at 5:46 p.m., indicated the resident was alert and oriented. He required the extensive assistance of one staff member for transfers. He had a right hip fracture and incision. The resident rated his pain level a 6 out of 10 with a scale of 1 being the lowest and 10 being the highest pain level. The Nursing Progress note, dated 3/23/25 at 11:23 p.m., indicated the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-22 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview, observation, and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff provided proper transfer techniques during transfers for 2 of 4 residents reviewed for activities of daily living. (Residents 183 and 14) Findings include: 1. During an observation on 1/15/25 at 9:13 a.m., Resident 183 was tearing up and moaning due to pain. He was unable to move his right shoulder and indicated he was in severe pain. The record for Resident 183 was reviewed on 1/17/25 at 10:24 a.m. The resident's diagnoses included, but were not limited to, primary osteoarthritis of the left shoulder, spinal stenosis, lumbar region without neurogenic claudication, and radiculopathy of the lumbar region. The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 8/15/24, indicated the resident was cognitively intact. The resident required partial to moderate assistance for transferring safely. The care plan, dated 1/13/25, indicated Resident 183 had impairment in functional status related to weakness. The interventions included, but were not limited to, encourage the resident to be independent as…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-01-22 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure non-pressure wounds were documented on the Treatment Administration Record, and wound treatments were performed in a timely manner as ordered by the physician for 1 of 6 residents observed for Quality of Care. (Resident 13) Findings include: The record for Resident 13 was reviewed on 1/16/25 at 1:53 p.m. The resident's diagnoses included, but were not limited to, Parkinson's disease, severe morbid obesity due to excess calories, type 2 diabetes mellitus with diabetic chronic kidney disease, SIRS (systemic inflammatory response syndrome) of non-infectious origin with acute organ dysfunction, muscle weakness, difficulty in walking, and unsteadiness on his feet. The Quarterly MDS (Minimum Data Set) assessment, dated 11/28/24, indicated the resident was cognitively alert and oriented. The nurse's note, dated 10/11/24 at 10:47 a.m., indicated that during the weekly skin assessment, the resident was observed to have an open, draining area to the left shin with redness around the area. The MD was made aware…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-01-22 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure pressure ulcer dressing changes were completed per the physician order; a new pressure area was measured, tracked or treated; and interventions were in place related to floating a resident's heels for a resident at risk for pressure ulcers for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. (Resident 14) Findings include: The record for Resident 14 was reviewed on 1/15/25 at 11:00am. The resident's diagnoses included, but were not limited to, hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction affecting the left non-dominant side; unspecified dementia, unspecified severity, without behavioral disturbance, psychotic disturbance, mood disturbance, and anxiety; cognitive communication deficit; repeated falls; and unspecified severe protein-calorie malnutrition. The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 10/27/2024, indicated the residents' cognition was severely impaired. The resident required staff assistance with Activities of Daily Living (ADL) The resident was out of the facility from…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-12-10 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
  Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident (Resident B) received Lantus (long-acting diabetic medication) as ordered by the physician for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for pharmacy services. Findings include: The clinical record for Resident B was reviewed on 12/9/24 at 8:05 p.m. The resident's diagnosis included, but was not limited to, diabetes. The Care Plan, dated 11/18/24, indicated the resident was at risk for hypoglycemia/hyperglycemia due to diabetes mellitus and staff were to administer the resident's medications as ordered. The admission Order, dated 11/14/24, indicated the resident was to receive Lantus insulin, 20 units subcutaneous at bedtime. The EDK (emergency drug kit) record indicated, on 11/14/24 at 9:33 p.m., a Lantus Solostar insulin pen was removed for Resident B. The November 2024 Medication Administration Record indicated the resident received 20 units of the Lantus insulin at bedtime on 11/14/24. The progress note, dated 11/16/24 at 11:57 a.m., indicated the resident was sweating and her blood sugar was 504. The physician was…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Potential for harm · E2023-12-04 · tag F0623 — pattern
  Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure 2 of 5 residents or responsible parties were provided written notice of Transfer/Discharge upon transfer to an acute care facility. (Residents 10 and 14) Findings include: 1. The record for Resident 10 was reviewed on 12/1/23 at 9:37 a.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, influenza due to identified novel influenza A virus with other manifestations; acute respiratory failure, unspecified whether with hypoxia or hypercapnia; chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, unspecified; and pulmonary fibrosis, unspecified. The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 12/27/22, indicated the resident was cognitively intact A nurse's note, dated 12/13/23 at 10:36 p.m., indicated the resident was short of air with oxygen levels between 78 and 84% (percent) on room air and between 88 and 90% on 2 liters of oxygen. The physician was made aware and gave a new order for the resident to be transferred to the hospital. The resident's daughter was made aware and was agreeable. A nurse's note, dated 12/19/23 at…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to TRILOGY HEALTH SERVICES — 123 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 35 rows in the source record cover these 26 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

13 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $1.3M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 16% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in IN