Meadows Of Ottawa The

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

54.2% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 135 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 69.4% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 98 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.39 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 68% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 7% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 86 beds and averages 80.2 residents a day — about 93% occupied, or roughly 6 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.20 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.75 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.93 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.73 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.39 on weekdays — 19% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.88 to 0.43 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 39% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

26 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 15 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · G2025-01-30 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, staff interview, interview with wound care nurse practitioner, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure wound monitoring and physician prescribed wound treatments were administered as ordered. Actual Harm occurred when Resident #71 fell from his wheelchair and sustained a laceration to the head which compromised a preexisting head wound. Resident #71 was evaluated at the hospital and returned to the facility with a hemostatic bandage dressing in place. The dressing remained in place for seven days without being changed or evaluated. The dressing was discovered to be severely adhered to the scalp, required debridement to remove embedded dressings and found to have a large amount of foul-smelling drainage between layers of dressings and wound with exposed bone. This affected one (#71) of three residents reviewed for the application of wound treatments in a facility census of 80. Findings include: Review of Resident #71's medical record revealed the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-01-30 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation, family interview, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure residents who were dependent on staff for activities of daily living (ADL) care received adequate assistance with personal hygiene. This affected one (#59) of four residents reviewed for ADL care. The facility census was 80. Findings include: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #59 was admitted on [DATE]. Diagnoses included paraplegia, injury to sacral spinal cord, other front temporal neurocognitive disorder, dementia, and anxiety disorder. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], revealed Resident #59 was rarely understood and dependent on staff for assistance with personal hygiene. Review of the care plan dated 10/04/22 revealed Resident #59 had paraplegia and required one person assistance with ADL care. Observation on 01/27/25 at 10:38 A.M. revealed Resident #59 had unshaven facial hair on face and neck. Interview on 01/27/25 at 10:40 A.M. with Resident #59's…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-01-30 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation, resident and staff interview, and review of facility policies, the facility failed to ensure interventions for residents with pressure ulcers were applied correctly. This affected one (#75) of three residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. The facility census was 80. Findings include: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #75 was admitted on [DATE]. Diagnoses included polyosteoarthritis, fracture of second lumbar vertebra, chronic kidney disease, anorexia, muscle weakness, osteoarthritis, and retention of urine. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 10/31/24, revealed Resident #75 was severely cognitively impaired. The resident required substantial assistance from staff for toileting, showers, upper and lower body dressing, and personal hygiene. Review of the most recent care plan revealed Resident #75 required encouragement and assistance with turning and repositioning every two hours with heel protector moon boots on while in bed at all…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-01-30 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
  Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on resident and staff interview, medical record review, and interview with pharmacy staff, the facility failed to ensure medications were available and administered as physician ordered. This affected one (#23) of one resident reviewed for pain management. The facility census was 80. Findings include: Review of Resident #23's medical record revealed an admission date of 06/10/24. Diagnoses included pinched nerve in the lumbar region, traumatic muscle injury, osteoporosis, spinal stenosis, chronic pain, chronic cluster headache, tremor, and opioid dependence with opioid induced psychotic disorder with delusions. Review of Resident #23's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 13, indicating Resident #23 was cognitively intact. Resident #23 displayed no behaviors during the review period. Resident #23 received scheduled and as needed (PRN) pain medication. At the time of the review Resident #23 reported her pain was almost constant and occasionally her…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-30 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
  Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on resident interview, medical record review, staff interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure blood sugar levels were obtained and insulin was administered according to physician orders, resulting in a significant medication error. This affected one resident (#47) of one resident reviewed for blood sugar checks and insulin. The facility census was 80. Findings include: Review of Resident #47's medical record revealed an admission date of 10/28/21. Diagnoses included type II diabetes mellitus and morbid obesity. Review of Resident #47's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14, indicating Resident #47 was cognitively intact. Review of Resident #47's care plan revised 01/22/25 revealed supports and interventions for the risks of hypo/hyperglycemia related to diabetes mellitus. Interventions included diet per order, monitor blood sugars as ordered and provide medications as ordered. Review of Resident #47's…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-01-30 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, staff interview and facility policy, the facility failed to ensure enhanced barrier infection control precautions were implemented as ordered. This affected one (#73) of 23 residents reviewed for infection control practices in a facility census of 80. Findings include: Resident #73 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the diagnoses including, hemiplegia and hemiparesis following non-traumatic intracranial hemorrhage, aphasia, dysphagia, acute respiratory failure, hypertension, history of tracheostomy, and percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy tube. According to the most current Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] Resident #73 was assessed with severely impaired cognition, dependent on staff for the completion of activities of daily living, received nutrition via feeding tube, and mechanically altered diet. On 01/22/25 a nursing plan of care was implemented to address Resident #73 required Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) during high-contact care related to…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-08 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
  Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, resident interview, staff interview and review of facility training, the facility failed to ensure passive range of motion (PROM) was completed as ordered. This affected one (#1) of three residents reviewed for range of motion. The facility census was 83. Findings include: Review of Resident #1's medical record revealed an admission date of 09/25/19. Diagnoses included acute respiratory failure, quadriplegia, emphysema, heart disease with heart failure, dysphagia, post-traumatic stress disorder, anxiety disorder, personality disorder, and delirium. Review of Resident #1's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 indicating Resident #1 was cognitively intact. Resident #1 had impaired upper and lower extremities. Resident #1 required extensive assistance with bed mobility, transfer, and toilet use. Resident #1 displayed rejection of care behaviors one to three days during the review period. Review of Resident #1's…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-10-31 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, staff interview, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure food was stored appropriately. This had the potential to affect all residents residing in the facility. The facility identified all residents received food from the kitchen. Additionally, the facility failed to ensure staff used appropriate hand hygiene when handling ready-to-eat foods. This affected three (Residents #9 #128, #6) of three residents observed for meal preparation. The facility census was 80. Findings include: 1. Observations on 10/23/23 beginning at 8:27 A.M. in the freezer revealed a box of chicken nuggets open to air, a plastic tub labeled taco meat with the lid off, and a torn open bag of breaded fish filets. Interview with [NAME] #178 during the observation confirmed the items were open. Continued observation of the walk-in refrigerator revealed a bag of chopped lettuce open to air, a box of bacon lined with a plastic bag. The plastic bag was completely open and exposing all bacon in the box to the air, and containers of raspberries, blackberries and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2023-10-31 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
  Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, resident interview, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure meat was palatable. This affected four residents (#6, #30, #38 and #68) and had the potential to affect all residents on a regular diet. The facility identified 23 residents were not on a regular diet (#4, #7, #11, #12, #14, #15, #16, #19, #22, #24, #26, #31, #34, #40, #48, #53, #61, #64, #71, #72, #128, #228, and #229). The facility census was 80. Findings include: Observations on 10/23/23 beginning at 12:03 P.M. in the main dining room during the noon meal revealed the main meal provided was chopped steak with mushroom gravy, red skin mashed potatoes, and vegetable medley. Observation on 10/23/23 at 12:05 P.M. in the restorative dining room revealed Resident #6 was eating her lunch unassisted. State Tested Nurse Aide (STNA) #165 was observed telling Resident #6 to slow down and chew or you're going to choke. The meat is very tough today. Observation on 10/23/23 at approximately 12:10 P.M. in the main dining room revealed Resident #38 received her meal. Resident #38 was observed to have…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2023-10-31 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
  Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation, resident and staff interviews, and facility policy, the facility failed to ensure residents had access to call lights. This affected one (Resident #49) of one reviewed for call lights. The facility census was 80. Findings include: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #49 was admitted on [DATE]. Diagnoses included hypertensive heart disease with heart failure, iron deficiency anemia, type two diabetes mellitus, and hypothyroidism. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident was cognitively intact. Resident #49 required extensive one person assistance with bed mobility, transfers, locomotion on and off unit, dressing, and personal hygiene. Review of the care plan dated 11/18/21 revealed Resident #49 was at risk for incontinence and falls with interventions to keep the call light within reach. Interview on 10/23/23 at 12:45 P.M. with Resident #49 revealed the resident did not have access to her call light. Resident #49…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2023-10-31 · tag F0638 — isolated
  Assure that each resident’s assessment is updated at least once every 3 months.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure Resident Assessments were completed timely. This affected one (Resident #53) of one reviewed for timely Resident Assessments. The facility census was 80. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #53 revealed an admission date of 05/31/23 with diagnoses of mild cognitive impairment and chronic kidney disease. Review of the comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #53 had impaired cognition. Further review revealed no additional quarterly or comprehensive assessments were completed after 06/05/23. Interview on 10/24/23 at 12:37 P.M. with MDS Coordinator #228 confirmed Resident #53 was due for a quarterly assessment on 09/05/23. MDS Coordinator #228 further stated she normally received reminders from the Regional Office when assessments were due and could not determine why the quarterly assessment for Resident #53 was not completed. Review of the guidance provided by the facility…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to TRILOGY HEALTH SERVICES — 123 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

6 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $1.4M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 15% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in OH