Silver Oaks Health Campus

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

66.6% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 313 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 75.9% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 145 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.58 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 87% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 24% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 80 beds and averages 57.8 residents a day — about 72% occupied, or roughly 22 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.80 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 1.06 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.63 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.56 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.90 on weekdays — 7% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.15 to 0.85 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 36% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

19 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 7 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · Gcited before2024-09-09 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to prevent a fall during care that resulted in a fracture for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for accidents. (Resident B) Findings include: During an observation on 09/09/24 at 2:31 P.M., Resident B was lying in bed with his call light in reach. The resident was lying on an air mattress and there were no side rails or grab bars on the bed. The resident's bed was located by the door. The resident's bathroom door was located on the far side of the room by the other resident's bed. The clinical record for the Resident was reviewed on 09/09/24 at 10:33 A.M. A Quarterly MDS (Minimum Data Set) assessment, dated 05/17/24, indicated the resident was severely cognitively impaired. The resident's diagnoses included, but were not limited to, anemia, hypertension, and multiple sclerosis. The resident had impairments to the upper and lower extremities. The resident was dependent on staff assistance for all care. A Care Plan, with a start date of 10/04/21 and a revision date of 8/21/24, titled ADL (Activities of Daily Living),…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Actual harm · G2024-05-08 · tag F0687 — failed to care for feet properly — isolated
  Provide appropriate foot care.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview, observation, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident did not acquire a burn during care. This deficient practice resulted in Resident B sustaining a second-degree burn (a mild to moderate burn caused by heat, chemical, or light source and damages the outer and second layer of skin) on the left foot. (Resident B) Findings include: An Annual MDS (Minimum Data Set) assessment, dated 02/08/24, indicated Resident B was cognitively intact. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, traumatic spinal cord dysfunction, quadriplegia, hypertension, and neurogenic bladder. The resident required extensive staff assistance with all ADL (Activities of Daily Living). The resident's clinical record lacked documentation of an order, or a care plan related to the staffs' use of a blow dryer to dry the resident's feet. A Progress Note, dated 04/02/2024 at 5:45 P.M., indicated the resident requested for CNA 2 to dry her feet with a blow dryer. CNA 2 dried the resident's feet and now there was redness observed to the resident's left foot. A cool rag was…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Potential for harm · D2026-05-12 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
  Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure call light accessibility for a resident with a history of frequent falls for 1 of 17 residents reviewed for accommodation of needs. (Resident 61)Findings include:On 05/08/2026 at 2:20 P.M., during an observation, the resident was seated in his recliner with his eyes closed. The recliner control was next to him, but the call light was on the floor behind the wheelchair, approximately six feet away.On 05/08/2026 at 2:52 P.M., during another observation, the resident remained seated in the recliner with his eyes closed, and the call light continued to be located on the floor behind the wheelchair, six feet away. On 05/08/2026 at 2:54 P.M., during an observation and interview, RN 5 observed the call light on the floor behind the wheelchair and stated it should be positioned within the resident's reach. She acknowledged she had recently been in the room to obtain the resident's vital signs but had not noticed the call light was not accessible.On 05/11/2026 at 9:09 A.M., an observation showed the resident…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-05-12 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
  Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to notify the physician of residents' change in condition for 2 of 17 residents reviewed for notification of change. (Residents 76 and 5)Findings include:1.The clinical record for Resident 76 was reviewed on 05/08/2026 at 1:18 P.M. An admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 04/27/2026, indicated the resident was cognitively intact. The resident's diagnoses included, but were not limited to, femur fracture and heart failure (a chronic, serious condition where the heart muscle cannot pump enough blood to meet the body's needs for oxygen, often causing fluid to build up in the lungs and legs). A current open-ended physician's order, with a start date of 04/22/2026, indicated the resident was to be weighed daily for congestive heart failure. The resident had the following weight gain with no indication the physician was notified: - On 05/05/2026 the resident weighed 305.7 pounds and on 05/06/2026 the resident weighed 310 pounds. A 4.3-pound weight gain in 24 hours, and -On 05/08/2026 the resident weighed 316.4 pounds…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-05-12 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
  Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure proper infection control practices were followed for the maintenance and positioning of an indwelling urinary catheter drainage bag for 1 of 4 residents reviewed for Urinary Tract Infections. (Resident 5) Findings include:On 05/06/2026 at 12:58 P.M., Resident 5 was observed sitting in her wheelchair in her room. The resident's urinary catheter drainage bag was hanging beneath the wheelchair, with approximately two inches of the bag directly touching the floor. On 05/07/2026 at 10:56 A.M., the resident was observed being transported down the 100 Hall while seated in her wheelchair. Approximately six inches of the urinary drainage bag was dragging directly on the floor during transport. On 05/07/2026 at 11:17 A.M., the resident was observed in a common area attending a Resident Council meeting. Her urinary catheter drainage bag was hanging beneath the wheelchair with an estimated six inches touching the floor. During an observation and interview, on 05/07/2026 at 11:34 A.M., the Activities Director (AD)…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-12 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
  Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to document residents' meal consumption for 3 of 3 residents reviewed for nutrition. (Residents 4, 76 and 7)Findings include:1. The clinical record for Resident 4 was reviewed on 05/08/2026 at 10:27 A.M. An admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 03/04/2026, indicated the resident was severely cognitively impaired. The resident's diagnosis included, but was not limited to, malnutrition (a serious condition resulting from an imbalance between the nutrients the body needs and what it consumes). The resident had a gastrostomy tube (a surgically inserted device that delivers nutrition, fluids, and medication directly into the stomach, bypassing the mouth and throat). A Registered Dietician Progress Note, dated 05/08/2026, included a recommendation to discontinue the resident's tube feedings. The resident was to continue with a fortified diet and a nutritional pudding cup supplement three times a day. If the resident's weights and intakes were to decline, they may need to reconsider the tube feedings.The Meal…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-05-12 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
  Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, observation, and record review, the facility failed to maintain complete and accurate clinical records related to the care and monitoring of a resident with an indwelling urinary catheter and failed to ensure accurate documentation of medication/treatment administration for 2 of 18 sampled residents. (Residents 27 and 6)Findings include:1. On 05/07/2026 at 1:46 P.M., during an interview and observation, Resident 27 indicated she had a suprapubic catheter (a thin, flexible tube surgically inserted through a small incision in the lower abdomen directly into the bladder to drain urine) and pointed to the catheter drainage tubing extending from beneath her shirt. The tubing was connected to a drainage bag hanging beneath her wheelchair. The resident reported she had recently completed antibiotic treatment for a urinary tract infection (UTI). A Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], indicating the resident was cognitively intact. The resident's diagnoses included, but were not limited to,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-02-10 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
  Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow appropriate medication administration guidelines for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for significant medication errors. (Resident D) Findings include:During an interview, on 02/09/2026 at 11:08 A.M., a family member indicated they were visiting Resident D on January 10, 2026, when a staff member came into the resident's room to test the resident's blood related to insulin use. The resident was not diabetic and had never been on insulin. The test was intended for a resident in a nearby room. The family member stopped the staff member from testing the resident's blood. The family member indicated seven days later they were notified the resident had received the wrong resident's medications. During an interview, on 02/09/2026 at 1:04 P.M., Qualified Medication Aide (QMA) 2 indicated on the night of 01/17/2026, she was administering medications from the 200 Hall medication cart for the first time. Resident D and Resident E resided in rooms near one…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Potential for harm · D2025-04-17 · tag F0554 — isolated
  Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to store medications appropriately for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for self-administering medications. (Resident 19) Findings include: During an observation, on 04/09/25 at 11:32 A.M., the top of Resident 19's nightstand by the door contained a bottle of nasal spray and two inhalers that were out in plain sight. During an observation, on 04/11/25 at 10:42 A.M., the top of the resident's nightstand by the door contained a bottle of nasal spray and two inhalers that were out in plain sight. During an observation, on 04/11/25 at 1:12 P.M., the top of the resident's nightstand by the door contained a bottle of nasal spray and two inhalers that were out in plain sight. During an observation, on 04/15/25 at 8:44 A.M., the top of the resident's nightstand by the door contained a bottle of nasal spray and two inhalers that were out in plain sight. During an interview, on 04/15/25 at 1:43 P.M., RN 8 indicated if a resident had medications at bedside, then they should have an assessment completed. During an interview, on…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-17 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review, interview, and observation, the facility failed to follow physician's orders related to cardiac medication hold parameters and adequately assess and monitor a resident's skin impairment for 3 of 15 residents reviewed for Quality of Care. (Residents 10, 22, and 19) Findings include: 1. Resident 10's clinical record was reviewed on 04/10/25 at 2:27 PM. A Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 02/10/25, indicated the resident was cognitively intact. The resident's diagnoses included, but were not limited to, hypertension, coronary artery disease, heart failure, and diabetes. A physician's order, with a start date of 09/24/24 and a discontinued date of 03/26/25, for amlodipine (a blood pressure medication), 10 milligrams (mg) once a day in the evening between 6:00 P.M. and 10:00 P.M. The medication was to be held if the systolic blood pressure (SBP) was below 110. The Vitals Reports for December 2024, and January, February, and March of 2025 were reviewed. The reports indicated the resident lack blood pressure assessments on the following dates when…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-17 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to follow the current nursing standards of practice when providing Activities of Daily Living (ADL) care to residents with impaired mobility that were at risk for falls for 2 of 4 residents reviewed for accidents. (Residents 41 and 47) Findings include: 1. During an observation, on 04/16/25 at 9:38 A.M., Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) 4 was on the right side of Resident 41's bed. The resident was lying in the bed on her back. CNA 4 indicated to the resident that she was going to perform personal care. The resident's incontinent brief was removed, and care was provided. CNA 4 had the resident roll onto her left side, away from the CNA. The CNA rolled the resident and the resident held on to the corner of the nightstand on the left side of her bed with her right hand. The resident's body was approximately one foot from the edge of the bed. There were no other staff in the room and the resident's bed lacked side rails. CNA 4 stayed on the right side of the bed during the entire observation of care. The clinical record…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-04-17 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolated
  Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to monitor and provide gastrostomy tube (g-tube) maintenance for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for tube feeding. (Resident 9) Findings include: Resident 9's clinical record was reviewed on 04/10/25 at 2:44 P.M. An admission Minimum Data Set assessment, dated 03/04/25, indicated the resident was cognitively intact. The resident's diagnoses included, but were not limited to, diabetes, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD), and ulcerative colitis. An admission Assessment Observation Report indicated the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The Nutrition section of the assessment indicated the resident had a gastrostomy tube. The resident resided in the facility in December of 2024 until she was discharged back home in January of 2025. She was readmitted to the facility on [DATE] until 03/28/25, when she went to the hospital for a COPD exacerbation. The resident returned to the facility on [DATE] and remained there. During an interview, on…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$8,824 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $8,824 — penalty dated 2024-09-09

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to TRILOGY HEALTH SERVICES — 123 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 32 rows in the source record cover these 25 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

17 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $1.7M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 15% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in IN