Wellbrooke Of Crawfordsville

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

64.7% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 216 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 75.7% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 103 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.45 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 76% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 7% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 70 beds and averages 54.5 residents a day — about 78% occupied, or roughly 16 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.55 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.57 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.06 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.00 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.78 on weekdays — 20% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.68 to 0.28 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 48% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

16 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 5 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · Gcited before2023-07-17 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  A. Based on interview, observation, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that staff used the assistance of two people when providing care and staff had the proper knowledge of the use of a low air loss mattress to prevent a resident's fall out of bed, which resulted in harm when the resident obtained a fractured femur (thigh bone) that required surgery for 1 of 14 residents reviewed for accidents (Resident 27). B. Based on interview, observation, and record review, the facility failed to ensure hot water temperatures were maintained within safe range for 3 of 14 residents reviewed for accidents (Residents 11, 40, and 26). Findings include: A. During an interview, on 7/11/23 at 10:06 a.m., Resident 27 indicated on 5/2/23 Certified Resident Care Aide (CRCA) 18 was providing incontinence care while she was in bed. CRCA 18 rolled her over to the right side of the bed and just kept rolling until she rolled her out of bed. She fractured her femur and had to have surgery. There was only one staff member who provided incontinence care at that time. Resident 27's record was…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-11-21 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident had their predetermined advance directive preference of Do Not Resuscitate (DNR) when she was changed to a full code status upon admission for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for advanced directives (Resident 69). Findings include:On 11/18/25 at 12:02 p.m., Resident 69's record was reviewed. She admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Her comprehensive care plan indicated she had diagnoses which included, but was not limited to, Parkinson's disease (a progressive, incurable neurological disorder that affects movement, causing symptoms like tremors, slowness of movement and rigidity caused by loss of brain cells).Upon her admission she had a living will, dated 2/27/1992, which indicated, she did not want her life to be artificially prolonged.If at any time I have an incurable injury, disease, or illness certified in writing to be a terminal condition by my attending physician has determined that my death will occur within a short period of time,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-21 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
  Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure that a resident's code status matched the comprehensive care plan for 1 of 5 residents reviewed for advance directives (Resident 12). Findings include: On 11/19/25 at 10:54 a.m., Resident 12's record was reviewed. She had the following diagnoses which included, but were not limited to, asphasia (difficulty speaking), dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), cystitis (bladder infection), Parkinson's disease, muscle weakness, and history of falling.Resident 12 had a physician's order for do not resuscitate (DNR) dated 7/22/25.Her comprehensive care plan indicated she desired a full code status dated 7/16/25.On 10/19/25 at 2:00 p.m., the Director of Nursing Services (DNS) provided a copy of the full code care plan.A policy titled, Comprehensive Care Plan Guideline, was provided by the Executive Director on 11/18/25 at 5:04 p.m. It indicated, .A comprehensive care plan will be developed within 7 days of completion of the comprehensive assessment (MDS 3.0).3.1-35(c)(2)

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-11-21 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a medication was withheld based upon the physician ordered parameter set for that medication. This deficient practice had the potential to effect 1 of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications, (Resident 12). Findings include:On 11/19/25 at 10:54 a.m., Resident 12's record was reviewed. She had the following diagnoses aphasia (a language disorder that affects the ability to communicate), dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), supraventricular tachycardia (rapid regular heartbeat caused by faulty electrical signals in the heart's upper chamber), muscle weakness, and history of falling.She had an order, dated 7/16/25 for metoprolol tartrate tablet (an immediate-release selective beta-blocker medication primarily used to treat high blood pressure, chest pain, and to reduce the risk of death or heart attack after an acute myocardial infarction) , 25 milligrams (mg) amount 1/2 tablet, oral. Special instructions indicated to hold for systolic blood pressure (SBP- top BP reading) less than 100 or pulse less than 60 two…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-21 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident's fall interventions were followed to prevent the potential for accidents when she was left alone in the bathroom and transferred with only one staff member on three separate occasions for 1 of 5 residents reviewed for falls (Resident 32). Findings include:On 11/19/25 at 9:52 a.m., Resident 32's record was reviewed. She was a long-term care resident with diagnoses which included, but were not limited to, dementia, hemiplegia and hemiparesis (muscle weakness/paralysis) following cerebral infarction (stroke) affecting left non-dominant side, and anxiety.Resident 32's nursing progress notes were reviewed.1. From 1/1/25 until 4/17/25, Resident 32 had already experienced three falls in her bathroom. She had a witnessed fall on 3/8/25 and 3/16/25, then an unwitnessed fall on 3/29/25 in which she sustained a skin tear injury.A nursing progress note, date 4/17/25 at 1:28 p.m., indicated Resident 32 had been assisted to the toilet and then attempted to get up without calling for assistance. She was found laying on…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-21 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
  Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to continue nutritional and pharmaceutical supplements for a malnourished resident who was not yet at her goal of achieving and maintaining an ideal body weight resulting in continued weight loss for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for weight loss and nutrition (Resident 46). Findings include:On 11/20/25 at 11:33 a.m. Resident 46's medical record was reviewed. She was a long-term care resident whose diagnoses included, but were not limited to, dementia, malnourishment, and adult failure to thrive.Resident 46 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], the first recorded weight was on 11/4/25 and it was 98.4 pounds. At the time of her admission the resident was put on a mechanical soft diet (a texture-modified diet for people who have difficulty chewing or swallowing) and she had an active order to be weighed weekly.An admission nutrition assessment note, dated 10/31/24, indicated Resident 46 had a Body Mass Index (BMI) of 20, her nutrition goal was…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-11-21 · tag F0744 — failed to care for residents with dementia — isolated
  Provide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with dementia.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide effective individualized person-centered care for a resident who exhibiting dementia-related behaviors, including repeated attempts to undress, restlessness, and signs of discomfort for 1 of 3 resident reviewed for dementia care (Resident 46). Findings include:On 11/18/25 from 9:40 until 10:30 a.m., Resident 46 was observed. She was seated in a reclined Broda wheelchair, pulled up close to a common table a the nurses station, and the chair was locked in place. Resident 46 was slouched down in her seat, and leaned to the far left of the chair. During this continuous observation, Resident 46 attempted to undress herself, at one point she pulled her shirt up and over her head, which exposed her breasts as she was not wearing a bra. She was not redirected or offered activities/interventions. Staff, residents, and visitors were coming and going through the common area able to observed Resident 46.On 11/18/25 from 1:30 p.m., until 2:30 p.m., Resident 46 was observed. She was seated in her reclined Broda…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-08-07 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure proper handwashing for 2 of 2 dining observations. This had the potential to affect 53 of 53 residents who ate meals from the kitchen. Findings include: During a dining observation on 7/31/24 the following was observed: a. At 11:41 a.m., [NAME] 5 was observed washing his hands at the sink in the dining room, he turned off the faucet with his bare hands, without using a paper towel to turn off the water. He then proceeded back into the kitchen. b. At 11:43 a.m., [NAME] 5 was observed washing his hands at the sink in the dining room, he turned off the faucet with his bare hands, without using a paper towel to turn off the water. He then grabbed paper towels to dry off his hands and dropped the paper towel on the floor. [NAME] 5 picked up the paper towels from the floor and continued to finish drying his hands. The paper towels were then disposed of, and he obtained a plate of food from the steam table and served a resident their lunch plate. c. At 11:45 a.m., Dietary Services Assistant 6 was observed to…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-08-07 · tag F0565 — failed to support the resident council — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to organize and participate in resident/family groups in the facility.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure resolutions to the concerns voiced by the Resident Council were communicated back to the Resident Council for 1 of 3 months of Resident Council minutes reviewed (Resident 35). Findings include: During an interview with the Resident Council, on 8/5/24 at 1:20 p.m., Resident 35 indicated she could not recall ever having any of the department managers or anyone else coming in to meet with the Resident Council to discuss the resident council's grievances. Review of the Resident Council Meeting Minutes, dated 5/13/24, indicated the following: a. A form related to nursing concerns of call light wait times and staffing number concerns, lacked documentation of any response from the nursing department. b. A form related to a maintenance concern of a missing bathroom door, lacked documentation of any response from the maintenance department. c. A form related to a request for more variety in menu options, lacked documentation of any response from the dietary department. During an interview, on 8/5/24 at 1:30 p.m., the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-07 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
  Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure care plan meetings were conducted at least quarterly for 3 of 24 resident's reviewed for care plan meetings (Residents 34, 23, and 1). Findings include: 1. During a family interview, on 8/1/24 at 11:14 a.m., Resident 34's daughter-in-law indicated she could not recall having a care plan meetings quarterly over the past year. Resident 34's record was reviewed on 8/5/24 at 9:56 a.m. The census indicated the resident had been admitted to the facility on [DATE]. A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 5/3/24, indicated the resident had severe cognitive deficit. A Resident First Meeting (care plan meeting) notes, dated 7/1/23 to 8/5/24, indicated the following: a. A Resident First Meeting was held on 5/2/24. The resident's representative had attended the meeting via telephone. The resident declined to attend. b. A Resident First Meeting was held on 8/1/24. The resident's representative had attended the meeting via telephone. The resident…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-07 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
  Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident with a weight loss of greater than 5% in a 30-day period, had been addressed at the time the weight loss occurred for 1 of 1 residents reviewed for nutrition (Resident 34). Findings include: Resident 34's record was reviewed on 8/5/24 at 9:56 a.m. The profile indicated the resident's diagnoses included, but were not limited to, unspecified dementia (the loss of cognitive functioning - thinking, remembering, and reasoning - to such an extent that it interferes with a person's daily life and activities) and dysphasia oropharyngeal phase (swallowing problems occurring in the mouth and/or the throat). A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 5/3/24, indicated the resident had severe cognitive deficit, required supervision with eating, had no documented weight loss, and had no swallowing or nutritional concerns. A care plan, dated 4/6/23, indicated the resident was malnourished and was at risk for malnutrition. Interventions included, but were not limited to, dietician to re-evaluate as indicated…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to TRILOGY HEALTH SERVICES — 123 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 34 rows in the source record cover these 23 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

10 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $1.4M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 14% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in IN