St Elizabeth Healthcare Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

63.2% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 99 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 74.3% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 35 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.28 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 44% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 10% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 64 beds and averages 52.6 residents a day — about 82% occupied, or roughly 11 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.25 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.83 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.99 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.71 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.47 on weekdays — 22% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.96 to 0.52 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 54% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 2 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

19 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 9 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · D2026-03-11 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure alternative food choices were offered to residents who chose to receive meals in their room for 3 of 3 residents reviewed for resident rights. (Resident 4, 40 and 41)Findings include:During an interview, on 3/5/26 at 2:04 p.m., Resident 4 indicated the alternative food choices offered on the menu were not available to residents who chose to eat their meals in their rooms. During an interview, on 3/9/26 at 11:47 a.m., Resident 40 indicated she chose to eat in her room and not eat in the dining room. She had to go to the dining room to pick up her meal and bring it back to the room herself in order receive food from the alternative menu. Resident 40 indicated this was a recent new change and she had not always had to do that.During an interview, on 3/9/26 at 11:51 a.m., Resident 41 indicated a new policy had recently been put in place and he was unable to receive food choices from the alternative menu unless he went to the dining room to eat for meals.During an interview, on 3/9/26 at 3:04 p.m., the Director of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-11 · tag F0644 — isolated
  Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a PASARR (Preadmission Screening and Resident Review) was completed when the resident had a new mental health diagnosis added for 1 of 5 residents reviewed for PASARR. (Resident 24)Findings include:The clinical record for Resident 24 was reviewed on 3/6/26 at 10:20 a.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), bipolar disorder, cognitive communication deficit, borderline personality disorder, and anxiety disorder. A PASARR level II, dated 6/19/22, had the diagnosis of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) handwritten on the document. During an interview, on 3/9/26 at 3:15 p.m., the Director of Nursing (DON) indicated Resident 24 had a diagnosis of PTSD. During an interview, on 3/11/26 at 10:40 a.m., the PASARR help desk indicated they did not have any records of Resident 24 having a diagnosis of PTSD on the PASARR level II, dated 6/19/22. Whenever a resident had a new mental health diagnosis added, a new PASARR level I needed to be completed, and it was not. The…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-03-11 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a comprehensive person-centered care plan was developed and implemented for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for care plans. (Resident 24)Findings include:The clinical record for Resident 24 was reviewed on 3/6/26 at 10:20 a.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), bipolar disorder, cognitive communication deficit, borderline personality disorder, and anxiety disorder. A PASARR level II, dated 6/19/22, had a diagnosis of PTSD handwritten on the document. The clinical record indicated the diagnosis of post-traumatic stress disorder was added to the resident's diagnoses list on 5/5/24.There was no care plan located in Resident 24's electronic record related to post-traumatic stress disorder.During an interview, on 3/9/26 at 3:15 p.m., the Director of Nursing (DON) indicated the resident had a diagnosis of PTSD. During an interview, on 3/11/26 at 12:20 p.m., the Social Service Director (SSD) indicated Resident 24 did not have a care plan for PTSD and should have one. A current…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-11 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident received a medication timely according to the scheduled administration time and to ensure a resident had a physician's order in place for a non-pressure skin impairment for 2 of 3 residents reviewed for quality of care. (Resident 24 and 56) Findings include: 1. During an interview, on 3/5/26 at 10:21 a.m., Resident 24 indicated she did not always receive her medication on time. She had to turn her call light on, ask for her pills, and would have to wait a very long time. The clinical record for Resident 24 was reviewed on 3/6/26 at 10:20 a.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), osteoarthritis of the left shoulder, bipolar disorder, cognitive communication deficit, borderline personality disorder, and anxiety disorder. A care plan, dated 6/3/24, indicated Resident 24 had the potential for cardiovascular distress. Interventions included, but were not limited to, administer medications as ordered. A physician's order, dated 2/28/25, indicated to administer…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-03-11 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
  Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a comprehensive assessment, person-centered care plan, and physician's orders were implemented for the use of an assistive device with transfers for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for range of motion and mobility. (Resident 44)Findings include:The clinical record for Resident 44 was reviewed on 3/5/26 at 2:19 p.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, displaced spiral fracture of the shaft of the right femur, venous insufficiency, moderate protein-calorie malnutrition, history of falls, fracture of the shaft of the left tibia and left fibula, difficulty walking, osteoporosis, disorders of bone density and structure, and osteoarthritis.A nursing progress note, dated 12/11/25 at 3:20p.m., indicated Resident 44 had returned to the facility from a hospital stay for a right femur fracture.A therapy recommendation, dated 12/12/25, indicated a slide board was placed in Resident 44's room. The recommendation indicated the slide board was to be used for transfers with two people and a gait belt. The slide…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-11 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
  Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a physician's order for the use of oxygen was implemented for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for respiratory care. (Resident 62) Findings include:During an observation, on 3/6/26 at 10:03 a.m., Resident 62's oxygen concentrator (a device used to provide supplemental oxygen therapy) was set on 3 liters per minute (L). During an observation, on 3/6/26 at 9:38 a.m., the resident was receiving 2 L of oxygen. The clinical record for Resident 62 was reviewed on 3/6/26 at 10:03 a.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), Alzheimer's disease, major depressive disorder, and hypertension.A care plan, dated 6/18/24, indicated Resident 62 received oxygen therapy. Interventions included, but were not limited to, monitor oxygen saturation, monitor signs and symptoms of respiratory distress, and administer oxygen by nasal cannula as ordered.A physician's order was not implemented until after…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-03-11 · tag F0742 — isolated
  Provide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with mental disorder or psychosocial adjustment difficulty, or who has a history of trauma and/or post-traumatic stress disorder.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the care strategies to meet the individual needs of a resident who had a history of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) were documented and implemented for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for post-traumatic stress disorder. (Resident 24)Findings include:The clinical record for Resident 24 was reviewed on 3/6/26 at 10:20 a.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), panic disorder, major depressive disorder, bipolar disorder, cognitive communication deficit, borderline personality disorder, and anxiety disorder. The clinical record indicated post-traumatic stress disorder was added to the resident's diagnoses list on 5/5/24.The clinical record did not contain a care plan related to post-traumatic stress disorder, the root cause, the triggers to watch for, or the interventions to implement in response to a trigger.Resident 24's profile care guide indicated Cultural Preferences and Trauma Triggers: There was no documentation after the statement to indicate what the cultural…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-05-07 · tag F0628 — pattern
  Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 4. The clinical record for Resident 27 was reviewed on 5/6/25 at 11:03 a.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, displaced intertrochanteric fracture of left femur, pneumonitis due to inhalation of food and vomit, diabetes type 2, hypertension, depression, anxiety, dysphagia, pain, heart attack, stroke, and myalgia. A progress note, dated 4/29/25 at 11:35 a.m., indicated Resident 27 was sent to the emergency room for symptoms of a stroke. The record did not contain documentation to indicate Resident 27 or the resident's representative were given information in writing regarding the reason for the resident's transfer to the hospital or the facility's bed hold policy, including the facility's charge to hold a bed. During an interview, on 5/5/25 at 1:42 p.m., the Director of Nursing (DON) indicated the discharge paperwork was usually printed and sent to the hospital with the resident, but there was no specific indication in the chart the transfer form and the bed hold policy with charges were given to…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-05-07 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff had documented training prior to administering 2 step Mantoux skin tests for tuberculosis (TB) and all parts of the procedure were documented to ensure accuracy for 1 of 5 employees and 3 of 7 residents reviewed for infection control. (CNA 16, Resident 2, 20, and 50) Findings include: 1. A facility tuberculin testing for employees' form indicated CNA 16 was given a second step Mantoux test on 4/10/24 and read on 4/12/24. There was no documentation to indicate the time the second step test was given or read to ensure there was a 48-hour lapse before reading the test. 2. The clinical record for Resident 2 was reviewed on 5/1/25 at 11:49 a.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, spina bifida with hydrocephalus, type 2 diabetes mellitus, paraplegia, cerebral palsy, major depressive disorder with psychotic symptoms, anxiety disorder, and neuromuscular dysfunction of bladder. A TB skin test record, dated 2/2/24, indicated LPN 3 administered the skin test. There was no documentation to indicate LPN 3 was…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-07 · tag F0565 — failed to support the resident council — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to organize and participate in resident/family groups in the facility.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure resident council concerns and grievances were resolved for 3 of 5 residents reviewed for resident council concerns. (Resident 28, 37 and B) Findings include: A meeting with the resident council was conducted on 5/5/25 at 10:01 a.m. The residents in attendance indicated call light wait times had been an ongoing concern. The resident council meeting minutes were reviewed and indicated: a. On 2/24/25, the residents indicated the call light waiting time was long. b. On 3/19/25, the residents indicated the call light response time remained untimely. The call light concerns from 2/24/25 were included with no resolution. c. On 4/21/25, the residents indicated there were concerns with the call lights being answered in a timely manner. The call light concerns from 3/19/25 were included with no resolution. 1. During an interview, on 4/30/25 at 10:34 a.m., Resident B indicated she had laid in her feces and urine before and there had been times when Resident B waited over an hour before someone cleaned her up. It could take…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to TRILOGY HEALTH SERVICES — 123 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 33 rows in the source record cover these 30 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

18 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $1.1M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 13% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in IN