River Pointe Health Campus

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

67.9% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 271 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 81.9% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 160 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.47 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 78% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 8% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 68 beds and averages 59.0 residents a day — about 87% occupied, or roughly 9 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.00 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.77 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.69 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.55 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.19 on weekdays — 15% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.94 to 0.34 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 40% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

17 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 7 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · D2026-05-19 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
  Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure accurate physicians orders were in the Electronic Medication Administration Record (EMAR), skin assessments were documented as done for one of 3 residents reviewed for hospice. (Resident B) Finding includes: On 5/18/26 at 9:58 a.m., Resident B's clinical record was reviewed. Diagnoses included but were not limited to, chronic systolic (congestive) heart failure, type 2 diabetes mellitus with diabetic neuropathy. Resident B admitted to the facility on [DATE], discharged on 5/16/26.Care plans were reviewed and included but were not limited to:At risk for skin breakdown r/t (related to) generalized weakness, impaired mobility, incontinence. Interventions included but were not limited to:Conduct weekly skin assessment. Pay particular attention to bony prominences, initiated 1/21/25, goal target date 6/28/26. Resident requires hospice care r/t congestive heart failure, date initiated 1/21/25.Physicians orders were reviewed for March, April, May 2026.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-06-23 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure there was a periodic review with a resident and resident representative regarding decisions of any advance directives and its provisions as preferences may change time in 1 of 1 random observation for advance directives. (Resident 48) Finding includes: On 6/17/25 at 11:42 A.M.,during a random observation of the Dashboard (Resident Information Tab) for the Electronic Health Record (EHR) the resident was observed to be a full code. On 6/18/25 at 10:40 A.M.,during a random observation of the Dashboard for the Electronic Health Record (EHR) the resident was observed to be a full code On 6/18/25 at 10:40 A.M., Resident 48's clinical record was reviewed. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction affecting right dominant side and aphasia. The most Current Quarterly Review dated 5/15/25 indicated that Resident 48 was severely cognitively impaired. The resident needed substantial assist for eating, and was totally dependent for toileting, dressing, and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-23 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure infection control practices were followed for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for care. The staff failed to wear personal protective equipment, wash hands, and ensuring a resident's catheter bag was not touching the ground during a random observation of wound care. (Resident 15) Finding includes: During an observation on 6/19/25 at 11:32 A.M., Registered Nurse (RN) 24 and (Licensed Practical Nurse) LPN 21 were observed performing wound care for Resident 15. RN 24 and LPN 21 performed hand hygiene and donned a gown and gloves. Resident 15 was observed sitting in the middle of his room in his wheelchair with his catheter bag attached to the bottom of his wheelchair. The catheter bag and tubing were observed touching the floor. LPN 21 pushed Resident 15 in his wheelchair into the bathroom. The catheter bag and tubing dragged the floor. RN 24 attached the catheter bag to the toilet roll holder. Resident 15 stood up using the assistive railing…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-06-13 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure proper storage of medications for 1 of 2 medication carts observed and 2 of 2 medication storage rooms observed. Loose pills were observed in a medication cart, a medication refrigerator was observed propped open with a temperature out of range, and medication refrigerator temperature logs were not filled out completely. (300 Hall Medication Cart, 300 Hall Medication Storage Room, 400 Hall Medication Storage Room) Findings include: 1. On 6/7/24 at 9:38 A.M., the 300 Medication Cart was observed with the following loose pills: 1 oblong yellow pill with marking 151 1 white round pill with marking D5 1 clear gel capsule with no markings 1 round yellow pill with marking RP101 3 round yellow pills with marking G127 1 round white pill with marking GC422 4 round brown pills with marking 08075 1 round pink pill with marking RP101 2 round white pills with no marking 1 oblong cream pill with marking J75 1 oblong white pill with marking KCM20 1 oblong lavender pill with no marking 1 round white pill with marking…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-06-13 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — pattern
  Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure education was provided prior to administering flu vaccines for 5 of 5 residents reviewed for vaccines. (Resident 27, Resident 12, Resident 12, Resident 29, Resident 30) Findings include: On 6/10/24 at 8:41 A.M., resident vaccine information was reviewed for the following residents: 1. Resident 27 received a flu vaccine on 10/4/23. The clinical record lacked information about education provided to the resident and/or resident representative prior to administering the vaccine. 2. Resident 13 received a flu vaccine on 10/4/23. The clinical record lacked information about education provided to the resident and/or resident representative prior to administering the vaccine. 3. Resident 12 received a flu vaccine on 10/4/23. The clinical record lacked information about education provided to the resident and/or resident representative prior to administering the vaccine. 4. Resident 29 received a flu vaccine on 10/4/23. The clinical record lacked information about education provided to the resident and/or resident…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-06-13 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure dignity was respected for 2 of 2 random observations. (Resident 24, Resident 31) Findings include: 1. On 6/7/24 at 12:08 P.M., RN (Registered Nurse) 21 was observed in the dining room assisting Resident 24 to eat lunch. RN 21 was standing. On 6/11/24 at 10:42 A.M., Resident 24's clinical record was reviewed. Diagnoses included, but was not limited to, Parkinson's disease. The most current Quarterly MDS (Minimum Data Set) Assessment, dated 5/29/24, indicated Resident 24 was rarely or never understood and dependent on staff to eat. On 6/12/24 at 9:27 A.M., the DON (Director of Nursing) indicated that staff should sit to assist residents to eat if they required constant assistance. 2. On 6/11/24 at 11:24 A.M., Resident 31 was observed sitting on the toilet with his pants around his ankles. The doors to the bathroom and the hallway were open. Two CNAs (Certified Nurse Aide) were assisting Resident 31 to use the toilet. On 6/12/24 at 8:17 A.M., Resident 31's clinical record was reviewed. Diagnosis included,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-13 · tag F0554 — isolated
  Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident that required assistance with transferring and moving had an order, evaluation, and care plan for the self administration of medication based on 1 of 1 residents reviewed for self-administration of medications. Finding includes: On 6/10/24 at 11:30 A.M., a bottle of Refresh brand eye drops and a bottle of Orajel oral pain analgesic were observed on the bedside tray of Resident 15. On 6/10/24 at 2:24 P.M., a bottle of Refresh brand eye drops were observed on the bedside tray of Resident 15. On 6/11/24 at 2:00 P.M., Resident 15's clinical record was reviewed. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease with (acute) exacerbation, emphysema unspecified, and acute and chronic respiratory failure. The current admission MDS (Minimum Data Set) Assessment, dated 5/16/24, indicated Resident 15 was cognitively intact and needed supervision for transferring and moving. Current physician orders lacked an order for eye drops, oral analgesic, and self-administration…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-13 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
  Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to notify the attending physician for 1 of 1 residents reviewed for skin conditions. The physician was not notified of new skin tears and orders for wound care were not obtained. (Resident 31) Finding includes: On 6/7/24 9:54 A.M., Resident 31 was observed to have two dressings on his left arm. On 6/10/24 at 12:54 P.M., a family member indicated Resident 31 had skin tears on his left arm due to shearing from the wheelchair. On 6/12/24 at 8:17 A.M., Resident 31's clinical record was reviewed. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, Parkinson's disease and Alzheimer's disease. The most current Quarterly MDS (Minimum Data Set) Assessment, dated 5/4/24, indicated Resident 31 was rarely or never understood, required substantial to maximal assistance (staff does more than half) for transfers, and did not have any skin conditions or issues. The clinical record lacked physician orders, care plans, assessments, and an Event form related to the two wounds on Resident 31's left arm. On 6/12/24 at 8:59 A.M., the Wound…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-13 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement care plans for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for ADLs (Activities of Daily Living) and 1 random observation. (Resident 31, Resident 15) Findings include: 1. On 6/10/24 at 12:54 P.M., a family member indicated staff transferred Resident 31 by grasping on to his shoulders which caused the resident pain. A gait belt was used while the resident was at home, but staff do not use the gait belt at the facility. On 6/11/24 at 11:24 A.M., Resident 31 was observed sitting on the toilet with CNA (Certified Nurse Aide) 3 and CNA 5 assisting him. The resident did not have a gait belt around his torso. At that time, the CNAs could not locate the gait belt and asked, where's the gait belt. The CNAs located a gait belt and transferred the resident from the toilet to his wheelchair. At that time, a family member indicated Oh. They are using the gait belt this time. On 6/12/24 at 8:17 A.M., Resident 31's clinical record was reviewed. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, Parkinson's disease and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-13 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure staff were following proper infection control protocols during 3 of 3 random observations. Staff were not changing gloves after performing care and were entering and exiting Enhanced Barrier Protection (EBP) rooms without donning and doffing Proper Protective Equipment (PPE). (Resident room [ROOM NUMBER]-unit, Resident 31, Resident 19) Findings include: 1. On 6/12/24 at 8:50 A.M., during a random observation of toileting, CNA (Certified Nurse's Aide) 25 was observed touching a resident's clothes without changing gloves after performing care. 2. On 6/11/24 at 11:24 A.M., CNA (Certified Nurse Aide) 3 and CNA 5 were observed assisting Resident 31 to use the toilet. CNA 3 and CNA 5 had on gloves. The resident was assisted to stand. CNA 3 wiped the resident's buttocks with toilet paper and pulled up his pants. At that time, CNA 3 did not change her gloves. CNA 3 retrieved the resident's wheelchair from outside the bathroom. CNA 3 and CNA 5 transferred…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to TRILOGY HEALTH SERVICES — 123 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 32 rows in the source record cover these 25 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

19 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $1.5M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 14% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in IN