No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Waterford Place Health Campus

800 St Joseph Dr, Kokomo, IN 46901 · Non profit - Other · 103 certified beds · (765) 236-1239 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (765) 236-1239 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
No harm-level citations or fines — but 11 lower-level deficiencies on record (see below)
Insights

On the public record, this home looks stronger than most — but visit before you decide.

In its favor
  • a strong health-inspection score (4/5) — the hardest rating to game (though it’s ranked within its own state, not nationally)
  • no harm-level citations in the current inspection record
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

5/5
CMS overall
5 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 4 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 3 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 5 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★★ 4/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
Pharmacy
201 N Dixon Rd · (765) 457-1191 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
Kroger0.3 mi
605 N Dixon Rd · (765) 457-2514 · Call to confirm hours
Park
1600 Judson Rd · (765) 456-7275 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
First EPC0.2 mi
2000 W Jefferson St · (765) 457-8201

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 5 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 4 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 1 to 5 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating5★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased5.0%11.0%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight5.0%5.5%5.4%typical
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%0.4%0.9%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.0%1.1%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms32.6%25.2%6.5%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.0%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury0.9%3.9%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened9.7%11.9%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication28.6%23.5%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine98.3%95.4%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers2.4%3.6%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control21.8%23.3%21.2%typical
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table8.4%13.6%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication1.1%1.2%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine83.7%79.0%79.4%typical
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission27.3%22.2%22.6%worse
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit13.4%10.8%12.0%worse
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days2.161.611.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days2.771.441.80worse

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

61.7% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 305 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

61.7%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
8.8%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
73.8%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.53U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.26hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.21hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.07hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 73.8% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 130 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.53 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 84% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 15% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF61.7%CMS range 56.6–66.651.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024better than U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF8.8%CMS range 7.0–11.310.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge73.8%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge70.8%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge66.2%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified99.4%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting100.0%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.6%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened1.2%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization7.9%CMS range 4.7–11.47.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.931.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.80
RN hours/ resident / day
0.83
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.36
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.99
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.66
RN hoursweekends
41.9%
Total nursing turnover
9.1%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 103 beds and averages 75.5 residents a day — about 73% occupied, or roughly 28 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.99 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.80 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.36 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.57 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.16 on weekdays — 14% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.85 to 0.66 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 42% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

4
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-02-02)
3
at the previous standard inspection (2025-02-17)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

11 citations, most serious first — scroll within the box to see all.

  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-02-02 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — pattern
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure daily weights were obtained as ordered by the physician, admission weights were obtained in a timely matter, and the physician was notified according to the physician's order for 4 of 4 residents reviewed for quality of care. (Resident 3, 93, 10 and 94)Findings include:1. The clinical record for Resident 3 was reviewed on 1/29/26 at 1:52 p.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, acute respiratory failure with hypoxia, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease with exacerbation, heart failure, fluid overload, chronic kidney disease, and acute pulmonary edema. A physician's order, dated 12/2/25, indicated to obtain a daily weight once a day. A care plan, dated 12/3/25, indicated to obtain a weight as ordered. The Medication Administration Record (MAR), dated 12/1/25 to 12/31/25, indicated the daily weight was not obtained and documented on 12/2/25, 12/3/25, 12/6/25, 12/9/25, 12/12/25, 12/15/25, 12/24/25, 12/26/25 and 12/31/25. The MAR,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-02-02 · tag F0644 — isolated
    Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a PASARR (Preadmission Screening and Resident Review) was completed when the resident had a new mental health diagnosis and was prescribed an antipsychotic medication for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for PASARR. (Resident 4)Findings include:The clinical record for Resident 4 was reviewed on 1/28/26 at 12:27 p.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, depression, atrial fibrillation, heart disease, vascular dementia, pseudobulbar affect, post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), and adjustment disorder with anxiety.A physician's order, dated 9/19/25, indicated to administer diazepam (an antianxiety medication) 2 mg (milligram) twice a day. A PASARR level I screen related to the diagnosis of anxiety disorder, and the new medication was not completed until 2/2/26 after the start of the survey.During an interview, on 2/2/26 at 3:39 p.m., the Administrator indicated when a resident had a new psychotic medication or a new mental health diagnosis added, a new level I needed to be completed. The resident did not have a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-02-02 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a catheter bag and tubing were maintained in a sanitary manner for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for catheters. (Resident 11) Findings include: During an observation, on 1/30/26 at 11:13 a.m., Resident 11's catheter was attached to the trash can next to the bed. The urine in the catheter tubing was cloudy with sediment (matter which settles to the bottom of liquid). The trash can had trash in the bottom. The clinical record for Resident 11 was reviewed on 1/28/26 at 10:22 a.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, history of urinary tract infection (UTI), acute kidney failure, anxiety disorder, chronic pain syndrome, hypertension, heart failure, chronic obstruction pulmonary disorder, retention of urine, and atrial fibrillation.A care plan, dated 5/30/24, indicated Resident 11 had a Foley catheter related to the diagnosis of neurogenic bladder. Interventions included, but were not limited to, observe the catheter tubing.A recently completed physician's order, dated 12/27/25, indicated to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-02-02 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure infection control practices were followed for 1 of 1 randomly observed resident reviewed for infection control. (Resident 11) Findings include:During an observation, on 1/30/26 at 11:13 a.m., Resident 11's catheter was attached to the trash can next to the bed. The urine in the catheter tubing was cloudy with sediment (matter which settles to the bottom of liquid). The trash can had trash in the bottom. The clinical record for Resident 11 was reviewed on 1/28/26 at 10:22 a.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, history of urinary tract infection (UTI), acute kidney failure, anxiety disorder, chronic pain syndrome, hypertension, heart failure, chronic obstruction pulmonary disorder, retention of urine, and atrial fibrillation.A recently completed physician's order, dated 12/27/25, indicated to administer ciprofloxacin (an antibiotic) 500 milligrams two times a day for 14 days for a UTI.During an interview, on 1/30/26 at 11:19 a.m., the Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) indicated the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-02-17 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — pattern
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure oxygen was administered at the physician's ordered level and to obtain an order to administer oxygen for 4 of 4 residents reviewed for oxygen. (Resident 118, 51, 9 and 58) Findings include: 1. During an observation, on 2/10/25 at 12:49 p.m., Resident 118 was sitting on her recliner wearing oxygen. The oxygen concentrator was set on 0.5 liters via nasal cannula. During an observation, on 2/11/25 at 3:30 p.m., the resident was sitting on her recliner wearing oxygen. Her oxygen concentrator was set on 1 liter via nasal cannula. During an observation, on 2/14/25 at 10:20 a.m., the resident was lying in bed eating her breakfast. The resident's oxygen concentrator was set on 3 liters via nasal cannula. During an interview, on 2/14/25 at 10:25 a.m., LPN 5 indicated Resident 118's concentrator was set on 3 liters, and she was not sure of the resident's oxygen order. The clinical record for Resident 118 was reviewed on 2/12/25 at 10:01 a.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, chronic obstruction…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-02-17 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — pattern
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure resident rooms and hallways were maintained and kept in clean and sanitary condition for 3 of 8 rooms (room [ROOM NUMBER], 106 and 107) and 3 of 3 hallways (hallway 100, 200 and 300) reviewed for environment. Findings include: During room observations, starting on 2/10/25 at 11:18 a.m., the following were observed: a. The 100-hallway had a very strong urine and bowel movement odor. b. room [ROOM NUMBER] had a large uneven area with peeling paint and cracks on the wall next to the bathroom. c. room [ROOM NUMBER] had an unsecured outlet on the wall at the foot of the resident's bed. The outlet was pulled away from the wall with black cords plugged into the outlet. The room had a very strong urine and bowel movement odor. d. room [ROOM NUMBER] had a large basketball-size dried blood smear on the wall by the first bed near the door. The resident's sheets had dried blood on both sides of the resident. The bed by the window had two little…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-17 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    2. The clinical record for Resident 54 was reviewed on 2/12/25 at 2:26 p.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, dementia, psychotic disturbance, mood disturbance, and anxiety. A care plan, dated 11/29/23, indicated the resident had the potential for cardiovascular distress related to a diagnosis of hypertension. Interventions included, but were not limited to, administer medications as ordered and obtain vital signs as ordered. A physician's order, dated 10/24/24, indicated to give metoprolol tartrate (a medication used to treat high blood pressure) 12.5 milligrams (mg) twice a day with special instructions to hold the medication for a systolic blood pressure less than 110. A Medication Administration Record (MAR), dated 11/1/24 through 11/30/24, indicated metoprolol tartrate 12.5 mg was given with a recorded systolic blood pressure of less than 110 on the following dates: On 11/1/24, the morning dose was given with a systolic blood pressure of 105. On 11/1/24, the evening dose was given with a systolic blood pressure of 107. On 11/6/24, the morning dose was given with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-01-09 · tag F0582 — isolated
    Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure there was documentation to show the resident or resident's representative made the choice about the Skilled Nursing Facility Advanced Beneficiary Notice of Non-Coverage (SNF ABN) for 2 of 3 residents reviewed for beneficiary notification. (Resident 27 and 315) Findings include: 1. The Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage (NOMNC) for Resident 27 indicated rehabilitation services would end on 12/26/23. The SNF ABN form, for Resident 27, indicated the resident no longer required skilled services but wanted to continue to reside in the SNF. Medicare would not pay for the stay at the facility since the resident did not require daily skilled care. The resident had three options to choose and was to choose only one option. The options included the resident wanted the services to continue and to bill Medicare for an official decision on payment, the resident wanted to continue the services and do not bill Medicare, or the resident did not want the services. The facility could not choose the option for the resident. The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-01-09 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolated
    Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a cognitively impaired resident who resided on the memory care unit was provided with preferred activities while in isolation for Covid-19 for 1 of 4 residents reviewed for activities. (Resident 45) Finding includes: During an observation, on 1/3/24 at 10:37 a.m., Resident 45 was lying in bed, in her room, and her eyes were closed. There was no music playing and no reading material noted on the resident's bedside table. During an observation, on 1/4/24 at 10:21 a.m., Resident 45 was lying in bed and her eyes were closed. There was no music playing and the television was not on. During an interview, on 1/4/24 at 11:20 a.m., CRCA (Certified Resident Care Assistant) 3 indicated the television in the resident's room did not work. The resident would watch television in the common area when she was not in isolation. During an observation, on 1/4/24 at 2:47 p.m., the resident was lying in bed, her eyes were opened. There was no music, the television was not on, and there were no books on the resident's side of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-09 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow the physician's order to call the provider and complete a re-check for low blood sugars for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for quality of care related to insulin. (Resident 1) Finding includes: During an interview, on 1/2/24 at 3:05 p.m., Resident 1 indicated she had to go to the hospital for high blood sugars in the past. The record for Resident 1 was reviewed on 1/4/24 at 12:02 p.m. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, type 2 diabetes with history of ketoacidosis (uncontrolled production of ketones) without coma, peripheral vascular disease, iron deficient anemia, and cognitive communication deficit. A physician's order, with a start date of 10/27/22 and an end date of 9/19/23, indicated the resident received insulin lispro (short acting insulin) per sliding scale 3 times per day. If the blood sugar was less than 70, call the MD. A current physician's order, dated 3/2/2020, indicated for blood sugars between 50-69, give a 15-gram carbohydrate oral feeding, wait 15 minutes, and recheck the blood sugar. If less…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-01-09 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to identify a weight loss, notify the physician, and implement interventions for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for nutrition. (Resident 12) Finding includes: The record for Resident 12 was reviewed on 1/5/24 at 12:18 p.m. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, dementia without behavioral disturbance, type 2 diabetes mellitus, adult failure to thrive, anxiety, and major depressive disorder. A physician's note, dated 4/3/23 at 6:04 p.m., indicated the resident tested positive for Covid-19 on 3/30/23. If the resident had signs of dehydration an intravenous line should be considered for fluid resuscitation. The resident was to be monitored for falls, increased thirst, urination, weight loss, constipation, and diarrhea. The resident had the following weights: a. On 3/1/23, the weight was 114.4 pounds. b. On 4/7/23, the weight was 106.8 pounds which was a 6.64% weight loss in 37 days. The Electronic Health Record (EHR) did not include notification to the physician of the weight loss, a nutrition note, or interventions in place…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to TRILOGY HEALTH SERVICES — 123 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 5 of 54.2+0.8 vs chain
Health inspection 4 of 53.5+0.5 vs chain
Staffing 3 of 53.3-0.3 vs chain
Quality measures 5 of 54.8+0.2 vs chain
The other 122 homes this chain runs (chain average 4.2★, per CMS)
1 of 5Heritage TheFindlay, OH 1 of 5The Oaks Rehabilitation and Healthcare CenterZanesville, OH 2 of 5Homewood Health CampusLebanon, IN 2 of 5Violet Springs Health CampusPickerington, OH 2 of 5Woodmont Health CampusBoonville, IN 3 of 5Cobblestone Crossings Health CampusTerre Haute, IN 3 of 5Creasy Springs Health CampusLafayette, IN 3 of 5Cumberland Pointe Health CampusWest Lafayette, IN 3 of 5Forest Park Health CampusRichmond, IN 3 of 5Franciscan Health Care CenterLouisville, KY 3 of 5Greenleaf Health CampusElkhart, IN 3 of 5River Terrace Health CampusMadison, IN 3 of 5Scenic Hills At The MonasteryFerdinand, IN 3 of 5Smiths Mill Health CampusNew Albany, OH 3 of 5Springhurst Health CampusGreenfield, IN 3 of 5Springs Of Richmond, TheRichmond, IN 3 of 5St Mary Healthcare CenterLafayette, IN 3 of 5Stonegate Health CampusLapeer, MI 3 of 5Sun Prairie Senior LivingSun Prairie, WI 3 of 5Taylor Springs Health CampusGahanna, OH 3 of 5The Willows at Fritz FarmLexington, KY 3 of 5The Willows at HamburgLexington, KY 3 of 5The Willows at HarrodsburgHarrodsburg, KY 3 of 5The Willows at SpringhurstLouisville, KY 3 of 5Villages At Oak Ridge, TheWashington, IN 3 of 5Waunakee Valley Senior LivingWaunakee, WI 3 of 5Wellbrooke Of CarmelCarmel, IN 4 of 5Arlington Place Health CampusIndianapolis, IN 4 of 5Ashford Place Health CampusShelbyville, IN 4 of 5Aspen Place Health CampusGreensburg, IN 4 of 5Avalon Springs Health CampusValparaiso, IN 4 of 5Bethany Pointe Health CampusAnderson, IN 4 of 5Blair Ridge Health CampusPeru, IN 4 of 5Bridgepointe Health CampusVincennes, IN 4 of 5Cedar Creek Health CampusLowell, IN 4 of 5Clearvista Lake Health CampusIndianapolis, IN 4 of 5Forest Springs Health CampusLouisville, KY 4 of 5Glen Oaks Health CampusNew Castle, IN 4 of 5Glen Ridge Health CampusLouisville, KY 4 of 5Meadows Of Delphos TheDelphos, OH

Showing 40 of 122; lowest-rated first.

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
WITHAM MEMORIAL HOSPITALOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST100%since 11/01/2014
LUMENT REAL ESTATE CAPITAL LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER MORTGAGE INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2023
BAYSTON, BRETTIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 01/01/2023
BRAND, JOHNIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 01/01/2015
CASTETTER, ANDREAIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 01/01/2023
HAWKINS, CLAUDEIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 09/09/2013
HORNBECKER, MICHAELIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 01/01/2024
REAGAN, JULIEIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 09/25/2024
BARDOCZI, STEPHENIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 09/03/2013
BRAVERMAN, KELLYIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 12/01/2021
SELLERS, DANIELIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 06/20/2024
TRILOGY HEALTHCARE OF KOKOMO LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 11/01/2014
NIEVES, ALMAIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 06/01/2025
RAVINDRA, BAIKADIIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 07/15/2025
BARNEY, LEIGHIndividualLIMITED PARTNERSHIP INTERESTsince 12/01/2015
DAVIS, DAVIDIndividualLIMITED PARTNERSHIP INTERESTsince 12/31/2019
AMERICAN HEALTHCARE REIT HOLDINGS LPOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 12/01/2015
AMERICAN HEALTHCARE REIT INCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 10/01/2018
CONTINENTAL MERGER SUB LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 10/01/2021
GAHC3 TRILOGY JV LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 12/01/2015
GAHC4 TRILOGY JV LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 10/01/2018
PARAGON OUTPATIENT REHABILITATION SERVICES LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 12/01/2015
TRILOGY HEALTHCARE MASTER TENANT V, LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 07/09/2025
TRILOGY INVESTORS LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 12/01/2015
TRILOGY MANAGEMENT SERVICES LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 07/09/2025
TRILOGY PROPCO II FINANCE B, LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 08/01/2000
TRILOGY PROPCO II LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 08/01/2000
TRILOGY PROPERTY HOLDINGS LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 08/01/2000
TRILOGY REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUSTOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 12/01/2015
TRILOGY REAL ESTATE KOKOMO, LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 08/01/2000
TRILOGY REIT HOLDINGS LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 12/01/2015

CMS files one row per role, so the 34 rows in the source record cover these 31 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

18 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$15.0M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
+14.3%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$1.9M
Related-party expense15% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 32%Medicare 12%Other / private 56%

This home reported $1.9M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 15% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$319per resident / day
operating cost
$9,692per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$372per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in IN

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Indiana Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Indiana
$8,943/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$10,326/mo
Nursing home (private)
$5,639/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 155678. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-02-02, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next