No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Springs At Lafayette, The

2402 South Street, Lafayette, IN 47904 · For profit - Corporation · 70 certified beds · (765) 446-9229 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (765) 446-9229 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse/neglect citation on record (F0600) — cited Jun 2024Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0758)1 actual-harm citation CMS recorded as corrected before the inspection ended (past non-compliance)
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • a strong health-inspection score (4/5) — the hardest rating to game (though it’s ranked within its own state, not nationally)
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
Worth asking about
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Jun 2024
  • it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • inspectors recorded 1 serious finding as past non-compliance — the problem was found, fixed, and verified before the survey closed, so it is history rather than a current condition, but it is still worth asking what changed

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

5/5
CMS overall
5 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 4 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 3 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 5 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
Urgent care / clinic
2525 South St · (765) 807-2320 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
415 N 26th St Ste 100 · (765) 588-3359 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
405 N Earl Ave · (812) 242-0333 · Call to confirm hours
Park
1915 Scott St · (765) 807-1500 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 5 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 5 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 3 to 5 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating5★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased7.8%11.0%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight6.2%5.5%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.9%0.4%0.9%typical
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.0%1.1%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms15.9%25.2%6.5%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.0%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury2.0%3.9%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened20.3%11.9%16.1%worse
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication33.3%23.5%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine97.0%95.4%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers2.2%3.6%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control35.4%23.3%21.2%worse
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table11.4%13.6%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication2.8%1.2%1.4%worse
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine94.2%79.0%79.4%better
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission20.9%22.2%22.6%typical
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit8.1%10.8%12.0%better
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days1.411.611.67better
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days1.371.441.80better

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

63.0% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 198 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

63.0%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
11.7%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
78.4%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.55U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.24hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.22hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.09hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 78.4% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 74 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.55 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 85% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 22% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF63.0%CMS range 54.9–70.151.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024better than U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF11.7%CMS range 9.3–14.510.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge78.4%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge67.6%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge81.1%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting100.0%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened2.0%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization8.0%CMS range 5.1–12.17.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.161.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.99
RN hours/ resident / day
0.53
LPN hours/ resident / day
1.99
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.52
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.70
RN hoursweekends
52.5%
Total nursing turnover
27.3%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 70 beds and averages 49.0 residents a day — about 70% occupied, or roughly 21 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.52 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.99 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.99 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.99 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.73 on weekdays — 20% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 1.11 to 0.70 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 52% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

4
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-09-24)
3
at the previous standard inspection (2024-09-10)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

14 citations, most serious first — scroll within the box to see all.

  • Actual harm · G2024-06-18 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a cognitively impaired resident with a diagnosis of post-traumatic stress disorder was free from verbal and mental abuse for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for abuse. (Resident C) This deficient practice resulted in Resident C experiencing emotional distress. The deficient practice was corrected on [DATE], prior to the start of the survey, and was therefore past noncompliance. Findings includes: An Indiana Department of Health report indicated, on [DATE] at 11:00 p.m., Resident C was verbally assaulted by two staff members during resident care. Staff Member 2 and 3 were overheard by staff to verbally insult Resident C. Resident C indicated she had been verbally assaulted by the staff. The clinical record for Resident C was reviewed on [DATE] at 12:50 p.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to type 2 diabetes mellitus, heart failure, dementia, and post-traumatic stress disorder. Her Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score was a 7…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-24 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the physician was notified of weight gains as ordered for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for physician notification. (Resident 9)Findings include: During an observation, on 9/19/25 at 10:09 a.m., Resident 9 had edema (swelling) in his bilateral lower extremities. During an observation, on 9/22/25 at 1:43 p.m., Resident 9's lower extremities had edema. During an observation, on 9/24/25 at 10:51 a.m., Resident 9 continued to have moderate swelling in his lower extremities. The clinical record for Resident 9 was reviewed on 9/19/25 at 11:31 a.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, edema, hemiplegia and hemiparesis following a cerebral infarction, atrial fibrillation, bipolar disorder, heart failure, vascular dementia, Alzheimer's disorder, and diabetes mellitus.A care plan, dated 6/30/25, indicated Resident 9 had experienced significant weight gain related to edema and congested heart failure. The interventions included, but were not limited to, obtain weight as ordered. A physician's order, dated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-09-24 · tag F0628 — isolated
    Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure there was documentation a bed hold policy was provided to the resident or resident's representative for 1 of 4 residents reviewed for transfer and discharge. (Resident 3)Findings include: The clinical record for Resident 3 was reviewed on 9/19/25 at 8:12 a.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, chronic kidney disease, cerebral infarction, gastrostomy, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, hypertension, congestive heart failure and bipolar disorder. A nursing progress note, dated 9/8/25, indicated Resident 3 had received 1000 milliliters (ml) of intravenous fluids with minimal improvement. Resident 3's son wanted the resident sent to the hospital. There was no documentation in the Electronic Health Record (EHR) of a bed hold policy being given to the resident or resident's representative at the time of transfer.During an interview, on 9/23/25 at 12:15 p.m., the Clinical Support nurse indicated she was aware the bed hold policy needed to be given to the resident or the resident's representative when…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-09-24 · tag F0644 — isolated
    Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure an accurate Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) was completed for 2 of 3 residents reviewed for PASSAR. (Resident 2 and 35)Findings include:1. The clinical record for Resident 2 was reviewed on 9/22/25 at 9:41 a.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, major depressive disorder, congestive heart failure, and cardiac arrhythmia. A PASARR level I, dated 2/27/19, did not include the major depressive disorder diagnosis or a mood stabilizing medication. A physician's order, dated 11/11/24, indicated to administer Depakote (a mood stabilizing medication) 125 milligrams (mg) twice a day for increased moods due to paranoia. During an interview, on 9/22/25 at 10:50 a.m., the Social Services Director indicated the resident had a PASARR level I completed without the diagnosis or medication, and another screening should have been implemented. 2. The clinical record for Resident 35 was reviewed on 9/22/25 at 9:55 a.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, metabolic encephalopathy,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-09-24 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a physician's ordered fluid restriction was followed for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for quality of care. (Resident 9) Findings include: During an observation, on 9/19/25 at 10:09 a.m., Resident 9 had edema (swelling) in his bilateral lower extremities.During an observation, on 9/22/25 at 1:43 p.m., Resident 9's lower extremities had edema. During an observation, on 9/24/25 at 10:51 a.m., Resident 9's legs continued to have moderate swelling. The clinical record for Resident 9 was reviewed on 9/19/25 at 11:31 a.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, edema, hemiplegia and hemiparesis following a cerebral infarction, edema, atrial fibrillation, bipolar disorder, heart failure, vascular dementia, Alzheimer's disorder, and diabetes mellitus.A care plan, dated 6/18/25, indicated Resident 9 received a diuretic medication for congested heart failure. The interventions included, but were not limited to, encourage fluids throughout the day if not contraindicated and observe the cardiovascular system…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-10 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to contact the resident's representative regarding a fall for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for notification. (Resident 25) The deficient practice was corrected on 2/21/24, prior to the start of the survey, and therefore was past noncompliance. Finding includes: During an interview, on 9/4/24 at 12:24 p.m., Resident 25's representative indicated she was not aware of a fall on 2/1/24. The clinical record for Resident 25 was reviewed on 9/6/24 at 2:58 p.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, Parkinson's disease, Alzheimer's disease, dementia, and cognitive communications. A nursing progress note, dated 2/1/24 at 8:55 p.m., indicated the resident had a fall during a transfer to bed and hit her head on the dresser. A fall event, dated 2/1/24 at 8:42 p.m., indicated the resident had a fall on 2/1/24. The resident's representative was notified on 2/6/24. An IDT (interdisciplinary team) fall note, dated 2/2/24 at 4:36 p.m., indicated the resident's responsible party was not notified at the time of the fall. The progress…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-10 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a cognitively impaired resident was safe from elopement for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for wandering. (Resident 27) The deficient practice was corrected on 8/24/24, prior to the start of the survey, and therefore was past noncompliance. Finding includes: The clinical record for Resident 27 was reviewed on 9/5/24 at 11:22 a.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, dementia, schizoaffective disorder, bipolar disorder, major depressive disorder, and anxiety disorder. A care plan, dated 3/25/24, indicated the resident demonstrated exit seeking behaviors. The interventions included, but were not limited to, assess the need for a roam alert band and apply as appropriate and to re-direct the resident away from doors and exits as needed. An incident report, dated 8/4/24 at 7:33 p.m., indicated the resident was found outside the building unattended. The resident was wearing a roam alert band. The alarm did not sound when the resident exited the building. A checklist for suspected elopement and missing resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Potential for harm · D2024-09-10 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure medications were secured for residents who self-administer medications for 2 of 2 residents reviewed for self-medication administration. (Resident 23 and 6) Finding includes: 1. During a medication administration observation, on 9/6/24 at 9:35 a.m., Resident 23 had Flonase nasal spray (an allergy nasal spray) sitting on her over the bed table. The resident was asleep upon entry to the room. A physician's order, dated 6/1/24, indicated Flonase Allergy Relief spray suspension 2 puffs in each nostril. Special Instructions: May keep at bedside (MKAB) once daily. 2. During an interview, on 9/6/24 at 11:30 a.m., Resident 6 indicated she had her eye drops stored in the basket of her walker. They were not secured in a locked container. During a medication administration observation, on 9/6/24 at 9:51 a.m., Resident 6 had an order for eye drops to be kept at bedside. A physician's order, dated 1/24/24, indicated Brimonidine 0.2% ophthalmic (eye) 1 drop in both eyes three times (TID) daily MKAB. A physician's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-07-19 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — pattern
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident was able to have a personal recliner in her room, a resident was allowed to have undisturbed privacy, and a resident was provided adequate access and space for personal clothing for 3 of 3 residents reviewed for room space. (Resident 21, 26 and 3) Findings include: 1. The record for Resident 21 was reviewed on 07/19/23 at 10:24 a.m. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, dementia with psychotic disturbance, delusional disorders, anxiety disorder, history of falling, presence of a right artificial hip joint, unsteadiness on feet, other lack of coordination, and repeated falls. During an interview, on 07/17/23 at 10:32 a.m., Resident 21 indicated she was admitted to the facility 06/23/2023. The room was small. She was not offered the choice of another room. Her roommate's television set was on the wall of her side of the room. The dresser was at the end of her bed, and she was only able to open drawers halfway. She…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-07-19 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to thoroughly investigate an incident involving a CRCA (Certified Resident Care Assistant) and a resident for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for abuse. (Resident 27) Finding includes: During an interview, on 07/14/23 at 10:10 a.m., Resident 27 indicated shortly after her admission, a CRCA was verbally abusive to her. She indicated the CRCA used foul language, was written up, and fired. The record for Resident 27 was reviewed on 07/17/23 at 2:55 p.m. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, malignant neoplasm of the brain, sequalae of cerebral infarct, depression, anxiety, and epilepsy. An admission MDS (Minimum Data Set) indicated the resident's BIM's (brief interview for mental status) score was 15 (cognitively intact). A typed document, dated 3/20/23, received from the Director of Health Services indicated the Assistant Director of Health Services spoke with the resident about the incident. The resident was upset over the treatment she had received by the CRCA. She stated the CRCA had not changed her all night and she was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-07-19 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — isolated
    Ensure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident received bathing as scheduled in the months of May and June 2023 for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for ADL (activities of daily living) care. (Resident 27) Findings include: During an observation, on 07/14/23 at 10:13 a.m., the resident was in her bed with the head of the bed elevated and her hair had a greasy appearance. The record for Resident 27 was reviewed on 07/17/23 at 2:55 p.m. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, malignant neoplasm of the brain, acute respiratory failure with hypoxia, type 2 diabetes, acute kidney failure, morbid obesity, sequalae of cerebral infarct, depression, anxiety, and epilepsy. A review of the point of care documentation, dated May 2023, indicated a bath did not occur on 5/11, 5/13, 5/14, 5/29, and 5/30/23. There was no documentation regarding the reason the bath did not occur. The documentation indicated the resident required extensive assistance with shower and partial assistance with a shower. A review of the point of care documentation, date June 2023,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-07-19 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure physician's orders and care plan interventions were followed for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. (Resident 10) Finding includes: During an observation, on 7/17/23 at 11:53 a.m., Resident 10 did not have a Prevalon boot (pressure relieving device) on his right foot while his left foot was covered up with a blanket. The record for Resident 10 was reviewed on 7/17/23 at 11:26 a.m. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, pressure ulcer of left heel, hemiplegia (paralysis) and hemiparesis (weakness) on left side, and muscle weakness. A current care plan, dated 3/3/22, indicated the resident was to have Prevalon boots on his bilateral (both) feet at all times. A physician's order, dated 4/28/23, indicated Prevalon boots were to be on at all times. The MAR (Medication Administration Record) on 7/17/23 indicated the resident had Prevalon boots on although no boots were observed. During an interview, on 07/18/23 at 11:03 a.m., LPN 4 indicated she was unsure if the resident' Prevalon boots…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-07-19 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to obtain a physician's order and to ensure care plan interventions were in place for the use of a wanderguard monitoring bracelet for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for accidents. (Resident 1) Finding include: During an observation, on 07/17/23 at 10:44 a.m., Resident 1 was sitting in a recliner, in the lounge area, with her feet elevated and her eyes closed. The resident had a monitoring bracelet (used for residents who wander) on her right ankle. During an observation, on 07/18/23 at 10:17 a.m., the resident was sitting in a recliner with her feet elevated and her eyes closed. The resident had a monitoring bracelet intact to her right ankle. The record for Resident 1 was reviewed on 07/14/23 at 3:07 p.m. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, fracture of unspecified part of neck of left femur, subsequent encounter for closed fracture with routine healing, and dementia. There was no order in the record for the monitoring bracelet. There was no care plan to indicate the resident had a monitoring device. During…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-07-19 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to educate the resident and/or the resident's representative about the potential risks of antipsychotic medications for 1 of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. (Resident 28) Finding includes: The record for Resident 28 was reviewed on 7/17/23 at 10:09 a.m. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, dementia with behavioral disturbances, delusional disorder, muscle weakness, psychotic disorder with hallucinations, anxiety disorder, adult failure to thrive, and depression. A physician's order, dated 11/5/22, indicated the resident was taking Risperdal (an antipsychotic) 0.5 milligrams once per day. During a resident first meeting, dated 6/28/23 at 2:10 p.m., the facility indicated a review of medications were conducted with the resident's daughter. The resident first meeting did not include the names of the medications reviewed and did not include if the potential side effects were reviewed. During a family interview, on 7/19/23 at 1:45 p.m., the resident's daughter indicated the facility did not educate her on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to TRILOGY HEALTH SERVICES — 123 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 5 of 54.2+0.8 vs chain
Health inspection 4 of 53.5+0.5 vs chain
Staffing 3 of 53.3-0.3 vs chain
Quality measures 5 of 54.8+0.2 vs chain
The other 122 homes this chain runs (chain average 4.2★, per CMS)
1 of 5Heritage TheFindlay, OH 1 of 5The Oaks Rehabilitation and Healthcare CenterZanesville, OH 2 of 5Homewood Health CampusLebanon, IN 2 of 5Violet Springs Health CampusPickerington, OH 2 of 5Woodmont Health CampusBoonville, IN 3 of 5Cobblestone Crossings Health CampusTerre Haute, IN 3 of 5Creasy Springs Health CampusLafayette, IN 3 of 5Cumberland Pointe Health CampusWest Lafayette, IN 3 of 5Forest Park Health CampusRichmond, IN 3 of 5Franciscan Health Care CenterLouisville, KY 3 of 5Greenleaf Health CampusElkhart, IN 3 of 5River Terrace Health CampusMadison, IN 3 of 5Scenic Hills At The MonasteryFerdinand, IN 3 of 5Smiths Mill Health CampusNew Albany, OH 3 of 5Springhurst Health CampusGreenfield, IN 3 of 5Springs Of Richmond, TheRichmond, IN 3 of 5St Mary Healthcare CenterLafayette, IN 3 of 5Stonegate Health CampusLapeer, MI 3 of 5Sun Prairie Senior LivingSun Prairie, WI 3 of 5Taylor Springs Health CampusGahanna, OH 3 of 5The Willows at Fritz FarmLexington, KY 3 of 5The Willows at HamburgLexington, KY 3 of 5The Willows at HarrodsburgHarrodsburg, KY 3 of 5The Willows at SpringhurstLouisville, KY 3 of 5Villages At Oak Ridge, TheWashington, IN 3 of 5Waunakee Valley Senior LivingWaunakee, WI 3 of 5Wellbrooke Of CarmelCarmel, IN 4 of 5Arlington Place Health CampusIndianapolis, IN 4 of 5Ashford Place Health CampusShelbyville, IN 4 of 5Aspen Place Health CampusGreensburg, IN 4 of 5Avalon Springs Health CampusValparaiso, IN 4 of 5Bethany Pointe Health CampusAnderson, IN 4 of 5Blair Ridge Health CampusPeru, IN 4 of 5Bridgepointe Health CampusVincennes, IN 4 of 5Cedar Creek Health CampusLowell, IN 4 of 5Clearvista Lake Health CampusIndianapolis, IN 4 of 5Forest Springs Health CampusLouisville, KY 4 of 5Glen Oaks Health CampusNew Castle, IN 4 of 5Glen Ridge Health CampusLouisville, KY 4 of 5Meadows Of Delphos TheDelphos, OH

Showing 40 of 122; lowest-rated first.

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
WITHAM MEMORIAL HOSPITALOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST100%since 07/01/2015
BAYSTON, BRETTIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 01/01/2023
BRAND, JOHNIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 01/01/2015
CASTETTER, ANDREAIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 01/01/2023
HAWKINS, CLAUDEIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 09/09/2013
HORNBECKER, MICHAELIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 01/01/2024
REAGAN, JULIEIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 09/25/2024
BARDOCZI, STEPHENIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 09/03/2013
BRAVERMAN, KELLYIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 12/01/2021
SELLERS, DANIELIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 06/20/2024
RHS PARTNERS OF LAFAYETTE LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 07/01/2015
THOMAS, JOHNIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 07/16/2025
WEAVER, JEFFIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/24/2020
BARNEY, LEIGHIndividualINDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNFsince 09/10/2025
DAVIS, DAVIDIndividualINDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNFsince 09/10/2025
AMERICAN HEALTHCARE REIT HOLDINGS LPOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 12/01/2015
AMERICAN HEALTHCARE REIT INCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 10/01/2018
CONTINENTAL MERGER SUB LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 10/01/2021
GAHC3 TRILOGY JV LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 12/01/2015
GAHC4 TRILOGY JV LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 10/01/2018
PARAGON OUTPATIENT REHABILITATION SERVICES LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 12/01/2015
TRILOGY INVESTORS LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 12/01/2015
TRILOGY MANAGEMENT SERVICES LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 07/08/2025
TRILOGY PROPCO MASTER TENANT III LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 07/08/2025
TRILOGY REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUSTOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 12/01/2015
TRILOGY REIT HOLDINGS LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 12/01/2015
WELLTOWER INCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 12/01/2015

CMS files one row per role, so the 30 rows in the source record cover these 27 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

14 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$9.3M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
+1.4%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$1.3M
Related-party expense14% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 24%Medicare 20%Other / private 55%

This home reported $1.3M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 14% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$382per resident / day
operating cost
$11,606per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$387per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in IN

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Indiana Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Indiana
$8,943/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$10,326/mo
Nursing home (private)
$5,639/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 155829. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-09-24, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next