Ridgewood Health Campus

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

56.3% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 180 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 77.6% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 67 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.38 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 66% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 14% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 71 beds and averages 66.9 residents a day — about 94% occupied, or roughly 4 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.59 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 1.15 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.79 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.39 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.68 on weekdays — 6% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.21 to 1.00 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 23% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

16 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 6 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · E2025-07-02 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to maintain resident snack refrigerators appropriately related to proper labeling for 2 of 2 snack refrigerators observed. (Resident snack refrigerator in the Main Building and the Resident snack refrigerator in the Legacy Building) Findings include: 1. The residents' snack refrigerator for the Main Building was observed on 06/30/25 at 2:33 P.M., with the Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON), and contained the following: - A clear plastic bag in a bottom drawer containing a large soft taco with no resident name or date. - A brown plastic bag with to-go containers. The bag was labeled with a resident's first name and dated 06/21/25. The ADON indicated they kept resident food in the refrigerator for 30 days; it depended on what it was. The bag contained a cup cake, coleslaw, and a fried chicken dinner. The ADON indicated it was probably not good anymore. - A white bag, dated 6/25/25, with no resident name. The bag contained salad dressing, hot sauce packets, and crackers. - A plastic container with a salad, dated 06/25/25, with…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-02 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, observation, and record review, the facility failed to provided Activities of Daily Living (ADL) care related to toileting a dependent resident in a timely manner for 4 of 24 residents reviewed. (Residents 8, 30, 25, and 23) Findings include: 1. During an interview, on 06/25/25 at 10:53 A.M., Resident 8, who resided on the 200 Hall, indicated she could not get help down here. It took two staff members to help her with toileting. She had been here in the facility for five years and did not have any trouble until this year. The clinical record for Resident 8 was reviewed on 06/26/25 at 11:50 A.M. A Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 04/09/25, indicated the resident was moderately cognitively impaired. The resident's diagnoses included, but were not limited to, fibula fracture, stroke, and Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD). The resident required substantial/maximal assistance from staff for toileting. 2. During an interview, on 06/26/25 at 10:20 A.M., Resident 30, who…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-02 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
  Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure proper positioning of a resident's indwelling urinary catheter drainage bag related to a resident who had a history of Urinary Tract Infections (UTIs) for 1 of 4 residents reviewed for urinary catheters / UTIs. (Resident 48) Findings include: During an observation, on 06/30/25 at 11:59 A.M., Resident 48 was in the Assisted Dining Room in her wheelchair. Her indwelling urinary catheter bag was hanging under her wheelchair and touching the floor. There was a bend in the bag with a quarter inch by approximately four inches of the bag touching the floor. During an observation, on 06/30/25 at 1:12 P.M., the resident was sitting in her wheelchair in the common area across from the nurses' station on the 200 Hall. One of her soft protective boots was kicked off and on the floor in front of the resident. Her indwelling urinary catheter bag was hanging under her wheelchair and touching the floor. There was a bend in the bag with a quarter inch by approximately four inches of the bag touching the floor. On…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-02 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
  Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident's medications were accurately administered for 1 of 5 residents reviewed for pharmacy services. (Resident 20) Findings include: Resident 20's clinical record was reviewed on 06/30/25 at 10:21 A.M. A Significant Change Minimum Data Set assessment, dated 05/27/25, indicated the resident was cognitively intact. The resident's diagnoses included, but were not limited to, stroke, anemia, anxiety, and depression. The resident received antianxiety medications during the assessment review period. The resident's current physician's order included, but was not limited to, an open-ended order, with a start date of 05/20/25, for lorazepam (a medication for anxiety), 0.5 milligram (mg) tablet. Give 1/2 of a tablet three times a day. A Progress Note, dated 05/23/25 at 8:50 P.M., indicated the resident received an incorrect dose of routine lorazepam. The physician's order was for lorazepam 0.5 tablets, administer half of a 0.5 mg tablet, for a dose of 0.25 mg. The pharmacy sent whole tablets instead of half tablets. The…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-07-02 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow infection control guidelines related to urinary catheter care for 1 of 18 residents reviewed for infection control. (Resident 3) Findings include: On 06/27/25 at 10:47 A.M., Resident 3 was observed in a wheelchair in the beauty shop. Her indwelling urinary catheter bag was touching the floor. The Beautician proceeded to push the resident down the hallway and back to her room. A half an inch of her catheter bag was dragging on the floor. On 06/27/25 at 11:22 A.M., the resident was observed sitting in her wheelchair in her room talking with her roommate and a visitor. Her indwelling urinary catheter bag was hanging under her wheelchair with two inches of it touching the floor. On 06/27/25 at 12:27 P.M., the resident was observed in her wheelchair in her room eating lunch. Her indwelling urinary catheter bag was hanging under her wheelchair with two inches of it touching the floor. On 06/30/25 at 10:58 A.M., the resident was observed sitting in her wheelchair in her room. Her indwelling urinary catheter…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-07-02 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — isolated
  Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to provide a sanitary homelike environment related to odors for 1 of 3 resident room hallways observed. (200 Hall) Findings include: On 06/25/25 at 10:50 A.M., the 200 Hall smelled strongly of urine. During an interview and observation, on 06/25/25 at 10:53 A.M., Resident 8, who resided on the 200 Hall, indicated it smelled bad in the facility, and she had her family members bring her air freshener spray. The resident had a can of air freshener. The clinical record for Resident 8 was reviewed on 06/26/25 at 11:50 A.M. A Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 04/09/25, indicated the resident was moderately cognitively impaired. On 06/25/25 at 1:06 P.M., the 200 Hall smelled strongly of urine with the odor increasing around rooms [ROOM NUMBERS]. On 06/26/25 at 9:45 A.M., the 200 Hall smelled strongly of urine from Rooms 210 to 215. On 06/26/25 at 3:37 P.M., the 200 Hall smelled strongly of urine. On 06/30/25 at 1:29 P.M., the 200 Hall smelled…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-07-02 · tag F0947 — failed to train nurse aides adequately — isolated
  Ensure nurse aides have the skills they need to care for residents, and give nurse aides education in dementia care and abuse prevention.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the staff had the required six hours of dementia training within six months of hire and three hours annually thereafter for 2 of 10 employee records reviewed. (Qualified Medication Aid [QMA]8 Certified Nurse Aide [CNA] 9) Findings include: The employee records were provided by the Employee Experience Manager on 06/27/25. The following staff members failed to have the required number of hours of dementia training: - Qualified Medication Aide (QMA) 8 was hired on 10/05/21 and failed to have any current dementia training in her file. - Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) 9 was hired on 07/18/24 and had 3 hours of dementia training. On 06/30/25 at 10:00 A.M., the Administrator provided three hours of dementia training for QMA 8. The training was completed on 06/27/25. She had no additional dementia training for CNA 9. During an interview, on 06/30/25 at 3:47 P.M., the Administrator indicated the Employee Experience Manager had noticed some staff had missed their date for mandatory training. The Employee Experience Manager had…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-29 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide the scheduled Activities of Daily Living care related to bathing for 1 of 3 residents reviewed. (Resident 64) Findings include: During an interview on 07/22/24 at 2:13 P.M., Resident 64 indicated she was lucky to get a shower once a week. At home she showered every other day. The resident's clinical record was reviewed on 07/24/24 at 10:02 A.M. An admission MDS (Minimum Data Set) assessment, dated 06/29/24, indicated the resident was moderately cognitively impaired. The resident's diagnoses included, but were not limited to, a right hip fracture, Clostridioides difficile (C-diff, a bacteria that causes watery Diarrhea), and urinary tract infection. The resident tested positive for C-diff Toxins on 07/03/24. The Electronic Health Record History and the Shower Sheets indicated the resident had the following showers or complete bed baths from admission to the facility from 06/26/24 to 07/26/24: - On 07/04/24 the resident refused a shower. - On 07/08/24 the resident received a complete bed bath. - On 07/15/24 the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-29 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
  Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Basedonobservation recordreview andinterview thefacilityfailedtofollowappropriateinfectioncontrolguidelineswhileprovidingindwellingurinarycathetercareforresidentswithahistoryofUTIs (UrinaryTractInfections for2 of3 residentsreviewedforUTIs (Residents62 and26) Findingsinclude 1. IndwellingurinarycathetercarewasobservedforResident62 on07/25/24 at2:15 PM, with CNA (Certified Nurse Aide) 2 and CNA3. ThestaffdonnedgownsfromthecartthatwasjustinsidetheresidentsroomdoorduetotheresidentbeinginEnhancedBarrierPrecautionsandplacedaplasticbagcontaining cleanlinensonthefootoftheresidentsbed Thestaffdonnedgloves CNA2 preparedwaterinabasininthebathroomfortheprocedure CNA3, wearinghergloves proceededtoshutthewindowblind turnedonthelight over the bed andadjustedtheresidentsbed using the bed controls. CNA2 broughtthepanofwateroutandplaceditontheoverthebedtable Thetwostaffmemberspulledtheresidentspantsdownandrolledtheresidentsidetoside placingatowelundertheirbuttocks CNA3…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2023-06-21 · tag F0641 — isolated
  Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to accurately complete comprehensive MDS (Minimum Data Set) assessments for 3 of 18 resident records reviewed for accuracy of assessments. (Residents 70, 37, and 31) Findings include: 1. The clinical record for Resident 70 was reviewed on 06/16/23 at 1:43 P.M. An admission MDS assessment, dated 03/21/23, indicated the resident was admitted to the facility from an acute hospital. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, stroke, coronary artery disease, and diabetes. A Discharge MDS assessment, dated 05/03/23, indicated the resident discharged from the facility and returned to an acute hospital. A Progress Note, dated 05/03/2023 at 10:09 A.M., indicated the resident discharged from the facility and was moving to the Assisted Living facility. The family helped move the resident's belongings, and the facility nurse gave report and resident paperwork to the Assisted Living nurse. During an interview on 06/21/23 at 11:21 A.M., the MDS Coordinator indicated the resident did not discharge to a hospital from the facility on…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to TRILOGY HEALTH SERVICES — 123 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 28 rows in the source record cover these 25 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

15 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $1.6M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 13% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in IN