No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

White Oak Health Campus

814 S 6th St, Monticello, IN 47960 · For profit - Corporation · 61 certified beds · (574) 583-0324 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (574) 583-0324 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0758)
Insights

On the public record, this home looks stronger than most — but visit before you decide.

In its favor
  • a strong health-inspection score (4/5) — the hardest rating to game (though it’s ranked within its own state, not nationally)
  • no harm-level citations in the current inspection record
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
  • a high payroll-based staffing rating (4/5)
  • lower-than-typical staff turnover (30% vs 45% nationally) — better care continuity
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

5/5
CMS overall
5 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 4 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 4 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 5 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★★★ 5/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
301 W Harrison St · (574) 240-1111 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
505 W Main St · (765) 564-4117 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
1088 W Broadway St · (574) 583-2063 · Call to confirm hours
Park
City Park0.6 mi
525 S 2nd St · (574) 583-5660 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
1010 W Washington St · (574) 583-7928

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 5 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 5 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 5 to 4 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating4★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased10.4%11.0%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight3.4%5.5%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%0.4%0.9%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.0%1.1%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms19.1%25.2%6.5%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.0%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury1.5%3.9%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened10.4%11.9%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication11.7%23.5%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%95.4%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers0.6%3.6%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control22.8%23.3%21.2%typical
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table10.1%13.6%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.0%1.2%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine93.3%79.0%79.4%better
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission17.6%22.2%22.6%better
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit9.3%10.8%12.0%better
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days1.261.611.67better
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days1.291.441.80better

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

59.4% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 186 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

59.4%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
11.2%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
90.5%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.50U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.20hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.22hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.08hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 90.5% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 116 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.50 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 81% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 6% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF59.4%CMS range 51.7–69.351.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024better than U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF11.2%CMS range 8.4–14.510.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge90.5%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge87.1%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge86.2%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting100.0%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay2.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened0.7%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization6.9%CMS range 4.2–11.27.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.211.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.70
RN hours/ resident / day
1.05
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.32
Aide hours/ resident / day
4.07
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.49
RN hoursweekends
29.8%
Total nursing turnover
43.8%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 61 beds and averages 52.4 residents a day — about 86% occupied, or roughly 9 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.07 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.70 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.32 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.69 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.22 on weekdays — 13% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.78 to 0.49 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 30% is below the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

3
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-06-02)
5
at the previous standard inspection (2025-03-10)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

11 citations, most serious first — scroll within the box to see all.

  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-02 · tag F0554 — isolated
    Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident was assessed to self-administer medications and had Physician's Orders to self-administer medications for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for self-administration of medication. (Resident 43) Finding includes: During an interview on 5/27/26 at 11:55 a.m., Resident 43 indicated she had kept two ointments in a drawer in her room. A tube of tacrolimus ointment (a topical medication used to treat skin conditions) was observed in the drawer. The other ointment she had used was triamcinolone (a corticosteroid used to reduce inflammation) and it had gone missing. A piece of paper posted on the chest of drawers contained instructions for the use of both the tacrolimus and triamcinolone ointments. During the interview, Resident 43 was observed scratching both of her arms.Resident 43's record was reviewed on 5/28/26 at 10:12 a.m.The admission Minimum Data Set assessment, dated 4/28/26, indicated the resident was cognitively intact.A Physician's Order, dated 4/28/26, indicated tacrolimus ointment 0.1%, one…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-06-02 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the Minimum Data Set (MDS) comprehensive assessment was accurately completed related to antipsychotic medications for 1 of 16 MDS assessments reviewed. (Resident 40)Finding includes:Resident 40's record was reviewed on 5/29/26 at 12:24 p.m. The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 4/26/26, indicated the resident was cognitively intact. In the 7-day look back period, the resident had received an injection, antipsychotic, antianxiety, antidepressant, antibiotic, opioid, antiplatelet, and anticonvulsant medications. The May 2026 Physician's Order Summary indicated promethazine (Phenergan), an antiemetic drug, 25 milligrams every 8 hours as needed for nausea and vomiting. During an interview on 6/1/26 at 3:28 p.m., the MDS Coordinator indicated she had coded an antipsychotic was administered because the resident had received promethazine and that drug required an AIMS assessment along with additional monitoring. During an interview on 6/1/26 at 4:10 p.m., the Nurse Consultant indicated the MDS should not…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-06-02 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure infection control practices were in place and implemented related to Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) and staff not wearing a gown during a peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC) medication administration observation. (Resident 62) Finding includes: During a medication administration observation on 5/28/26 at 12:36 p.m., RN 1 was observed preparing Resident 62's medications, which included antibiotic medication to be administered intravenously through the resident's PICC line. The resident's bathroom door had a sign that indicated EBP was to be used. RN 1 entered the resident's room, used hand sanitizer, and donned gloves. She had not donned a gown. She then proceeded to administer the intravenous medication through the PICC line. At 1:24 p.m. the antibiotic was complete and RN 1 entered the room to disconnect the medication. She used hand sanitizer, donned gloves, disconnected the tubing and flushed the PICC line. She had not donned a gown.During an interview on 5/28/26 at 1:29 p.m., RN 1…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2025-03-10 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to keep the kitchen clean and in good repair related to a build up of food debris and grease on the sides of the oven, deep fryer, floor between the oven and deep fryer, and in the bottom front of a closed warming food cart. The facility also failed to have boxes of food not stored up to the ceiling in the walk in freezer. This had the potential to affect 52 of 52 residents who resided in the facility and received food from the kitchen. (Main Kitchen) Findings include: During the Initial Kitchen Sanitation Tour on 3/3/25 at 10:53 a.m., with the Director of Food Services, the following was observed: a. There was a build up of food debris and grease on the sides of the oven. b. There was a build up of food debris and grease on the sides of the deep fryer. c. There was a build up of food debris and grease on the floor between the oven and the deep fryer. d. There was a build up of food debris and grease in the bottom front of a closed warming food cart. e. There were multiple boxes of food stored up to the ceiling…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-03-10 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolated
    Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to provide proper feeding tube (gastrostomy tube) (g-tube) care as per professional standards, related to verification of the g-tube placement not completed prior to medication administration for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for feeding tube care. (Resident 29) Finding includes: During an observation of medication pass on 3/5/25 at 12:24 p.m., RN 1 was observed preparing and administering g-tube medications to Resident 29. RN 1 prepared and crushed carbidopa-levodopa (treatment for Parkinson's disease) 25 milligram-100 milligram 2 tablets and glycopyrrolate (treatment for ulcers) 1 milligram tablet in separate medication pouches and then put them into separate medication cups after they were crushed. She washed her hands, donned a gown and gloves, and entered the resident's room. She mixed each medication with approximately 15 milliliters (ml) of water. She flushed the g-tube with 30 ml of water, milked the tubing as the water was not going down by gravity, and then pushed the plunger of the syringe to get the water…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-03-10 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to identify or act on an irregularity in a resident's medication regimen related to a recommended lab not being completed and an accepted recommendation with no follow up for 2 of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. (Residents 16 and 8) Findings include: 1. Resident 16's record was reviewed on 3/5/25 at 8:45 a.m. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, Alzheimer's disease, major depression and anemia. The Quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment, dated 1/9/25, indicated the resident had severe cognitive deficits and required substantial assistance for toileting and transfers. A Pharmacy Recommendation, dated 11/19/24, indicated the resident had an order for an iron supplement for over six months and to consider checking serum iron, ferritin, TIBC and percent transferrin saturation (blood tests to determine iron iron levels) to determine if there was a continued need for supplementation. The recommendation was denied per PCP (primary care physician). There was no documentation for why the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-03-10 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure each resident's medication regimen was managed and monitored to promote or maintain the resident's highest practicable mental, physical, and psychosocial well-being related to lack of non-pharmacological interventions used prior to giving anti-anxiety medication for 1 of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. (Resident 252) Finding includes: Resident 252's record was reviewed on 3/4/25 at 3:40 p.m. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, Parkinson's disease, bipolar disorder, and anxiety disorder. The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 3/2/25, was still in progress. A Care Plan, dated 2/25/25, indicated the resident was at risk for adverse consequences related to receiving anxiolytic medications. Interventions included, but were not limited to, attempt non-pharmacological interventions prior to administering as needed (PRN) anxiolytics and administer per orders. The current March 2025 Physician Order Summary indicated clonazepam (anxiolytic) 2 milligrams 1 tablet as needed for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-03-10 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure a medication was kept in a locked medication cart at all times for 1 of 8 residents observed during medication administration. (Resident 29) Finding includes: During an observation of medication pass on 3/5/25 at 12:24 p.m., RN 1 was observed preparing and administering g-tube medications to Resident 29. RN 1 prepared and crushed carbidopa-levodopa (treatment for Parkinson's disease) 25 milligram-100 milligram 2 tablets and glycopyrrolate (treatment for ulcers) 1 milligram tablet in separate medication pouches and then put them into separate medication cups after they were crushed. She washed her hands, donned a gown and gloves, and entered the residents room. She mixed each medication with approximately 15 milliliters (ml) of water. She flushed the g-tube with 30 mls of water, milked the tubing as the water was not going down by gravity, and then pushed the plunger of the syringe to get the water to flow. She did not check for placement of the g-tube prior to administering the water flush. RN 1 then poured…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-12 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident's dignity was maintained, related to not placing a dignity bag over a foley (urinary) catheter drainage bag, for 1 of 1 residents reviewed for urinary catheters. (Resident 40) Finding includes: On 2/7/24 at 10:55 a.m., Resident 40 was observed in his room in bed. His catheter drainage bag was observed uncovered and draining yellow urine by gravity. On 2/7/24 at 11:26 a.m., Resident 40's catheter drainage bag was observed uncovered and draining yellow urine by gravity. Resident 40's record was reviewed on 2/7/24 at 10:28 a.m. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, Parkinson's disease, hemiplegia (paralysis) and hemiparesis (weakness) following cerebral infarction affecting the right dominant side, and obstructive uropathy (obstruction causing a blockage of the flow of urine.) The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 1/18/24, indicated the resident was cognitively intact for daily decision making. He had an indwelling urinary catheter. A Physician's Order, dated 1/11/24,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-12 · tag F0554 — isolated
    Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents had Physician's Orders for self-administration of medication,s and an assessment to self-administer their own medications, for 2 of 2 residents reviewed for self-administration of medication. (Residents 13 and 19) Findings include: 1. On 2/5/24 at 11:11 a.m., a bottle of Tylenol 325 milligram (mg) tablets was noted to be on Resident 13's bedside table. On 2/5/24 at 2:51 p.m., a bottle of Tylenol 325 mg tablets was noted to be on Resident 13's bedside table. The record for Resident 13 was reviewed on 2/7/24 at 12:37 p.m. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, vascular dementia without behavioral disturbance. The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 1/5/24, indicated the resident was moderately impaired for daily decision making. A Physician's Order, dated 5/30/23, indicated acetaminophen tablet 325 milligrams, 2 tablets for fever/pain every 4 hours as needed. There were no orders for self-administration or a self-administration assessment completed for the medication.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-12 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure skin odors and discolorations were assessed, monitored, and treated, for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for skin conditions (non-pressure related). (Resident 19) Finding includes: During an interview on 2/5/24 at 11:42 a.m., Resident 19 indicated she had an area of skin underneath her breasts that had a foul odor for a while and was itchy. She was unable to see if it was reddened, and indicated the facility staff were not treating the area. She was observed scratching the area and a foul odor was noted when the resident lifted her breast. The record for Resident 19 was reviewed on 2/7/24 at 2:01 p.m. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), chronic respiratory failure, and chronic bronchitis. The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 1/25/24, indicated the resident was cognitively intact for daily decision making. She had no pressure sores or skin conditions. There were no orders for a treatment or any documentation in the record related to the skin area…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to TRILOGY HEALTH SERVICES — 123 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 5 of 54.2+0.8 vs chain
Health inspection 4 of 53.5+0.5 vs chain
Staffing 4 of 53.3+0.7 vs chain
Quality measures 5 of 54.8+0.2 vs chain
The other 122 homes this chain runs (chain average 4.2★, per CMS)
1 of 5Heritage TheFindlay, OH 1 of 5The Oaks Rehabilitation and Healthcare CenterZanesville, OH 2 of 5Homewood Health CampusLebanon, IN 2 of 5Violet Springs Health CampusPickerington, OH 2 of 5Woodmont Health CampusBoonville, IN 3 of 5Cobblestone Crossings Health CampusTerre Haute, IN 3 of 5Creasy Springs Health CampusLafayette, IN 3 of 5Cumberland Pointe Health CampusWest Lafayette, IN 3 of 5Forest Park Health CampusRichmond, IN 3 of 5Franciscan Health Care CenterLouisville, KY 3 of 5Greenleaf Health CampusElkhart, IN 3 of 5River Terrace Health CampusMadison, IN 3 of 5Scenic Hills At The MonasteryFerdinand, IN 3 of 5Smiths Mill Health CampusNew Albany, OH 3 of 5Springhurst Health CampusGreenfield, IN 3 of 5Springs Of Richmond, TheRichmond, IN 3 of 5St Mary Healthcare CenterLafayette, IN 3 of 5Stonegate Health CampusLapeer, MI 3 of 5Sun Prairie Senior LivingSun Prairie, WI 3 of 5Taylor Springs Health CampusGahanna, OH 3 of 5The Willows at Fritz FarmLexington, KY 3 of 5The Willows at HamburgLexington, KY 3 of 5The Willows at HarrodsburgHarrodsburg, KY 3 of 5The Willows at SpringhurstLouisville, KY 3 of 5Villages At Oak Ridge, TheWashington, IN 3 of 5Waunakee Valley Senior LivingWaunakee, WI 3 of 5Wellbrooke Of CarmelCarmel, IN 4 of 5Arlington Place Health CampusIndianapolis, IN 4 of 5Ashford Place Health CampusShelbyville, IN 4 of 5Aspen Place Health CampusGreensburg, IN 4 of 5Avalon Springs Health CampusValparaiso, IN 4 of 5Bethany Pointe Health CampusAnderson, IN 4 of 5Blair Ridge Health CampusPeru, IN 4 of 5Bridgepointe Health CampusVincennes, IN 4 of 5Cedar Creek Health CampusLowell, IN 4 of 5Clearvista Lake Health CampusIndianapolis, IN 4 of 5Forest Springs Health CampusLouisville, KY 4 of 5Glen Oaks Health CampusNew Castle, IN 4 of 5Glen Ridge Health CampusLouisville, KY 4 of 5Meadows Of Delphos TheDelphos, OH

Showing 40 of 122; lowest-rated first.

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
WITHAM MEMORIAL HOSPITALOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST100%since 11/01/2014
KEYBANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATIONOrganization5% OR GREATER MORTGAGE INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFsince 06/26/2025
BAYSTON, BRETTIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 01/01/2023
BRAND, JOHNIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 01/01/2015
CASTETTER, ANDREAIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 01/01/2023
HAWKINS, CLAUDEIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 09/01/2013
HORNBECKER, MICHAELIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 01/01/2024
REAGAN, JULIEIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 09/25/2024
BARDOCZI, STEPHENIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 09/03/2013
BRAVERMAN, KELLYIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 12/01/2021
SELLERS, DANIELIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 06/20/2024
TRILOGY HEALTHCARE OF MONTICELLO LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 11/01/2014
ANDERSON, STEPHANIEIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 06/07/2021
THOMAS, JOHNIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 07/15/2025
BARNEY, LEIGHIndividualLIMITED PARTNERSHIP INTERESTsince 12/01/2015
DAVIS, DAVIDIndividualLIMITED PARTNERSHIP INTERESTsince 12/31/2019
AMERICAN HEALTHCARE REIT HOLDINGS LPOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 12/01/2015
AMERICAN HEALTHCARE REIT INCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 10/01/2018
CONTINENTAL MERGER SUB LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 10/01/2021
GAHC3 TRILOGY JV LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 12/01/2015
GAHC4 TRILOGY JV LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 10/01/2018
PARAGON OUTPATIENT REHABILITATION SERVICES LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 12/01/2015
TRILOGY HEALTH SERVICES LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 08/01/2020
TRILOGY HEALTHCARE HOLDINGS INCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 12/01/2015
TRILOGY HEALTHCARE MASTER TENANT IX LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 06/26/2025
TRILOGY INVESTORS LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 12/01/2015
TRILOGY MANAGEMENT SERVICES LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 07/02/2025
TRILOGY PROPCO FINANCE LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 08/01/2020
TRILOGY PROPERTY HOLDINGS LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 08/01/2020
TRILOGY REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUSTOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 12/01/2015
TRILOGY REAL ESTATE WHITE OAKS, LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 08/01/2020
TRILOGY REIT HOLDINGS LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 12/01/2015

CMS files one row per role, so the 35 rows in the source record cover these 32 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

19 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$12.5M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
+14.2%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$1.6M
Related-party expense15% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 22%Medicare 14%Other / private 64%

This home reported $1.6M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 15% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$278per resident / day
operating cost
$8,464per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$325per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in IN

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Indiana Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Indiana
$8,943/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$10,326/mo
Nursing home (private)
$5,639/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 155782. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-06-02, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next