Morrison Woods Health Campus

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

62.1% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 321 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 71.3% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 122 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.44 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 74% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 19% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 68 beds and averages 59.1 residents a day — about 87% occupied, or roughly 9 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.67 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.74 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.87 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.34 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.80 on weekdays — 10% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.79 to 0.60 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 45% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

17 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 7 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-06-27 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — pattern
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure self-reported incidents were accurately reported to the State Agency (Indiana Department of Health) to allow for evaluation of the need to advocate for the health and safety of facility residents for 3 of 3 self- reported incidents reviewed. (Resident 9, 41, and 34) Findings include: 1. Facility self-reported Incident Number 344, dated 6/1/25, indicated the following: Brief Description of Incident .Description added - - 6/1/25 (Resident 9) resides on rehab unit of health campus. Resident expressed concerns with approach to care provided by CRCA (C.N.A.) Preventive Measures Taken: .care plan to be reviewed and updated as indicated. Staff educated regarding abuse and neglect The, 6/1/25 Facility Incident Report did not indicate what Resident 9 alleged, where the event occurred, what care activity was occurring at the time, or that the resident had alleged abuse. The five-day follow-up also lacked this information. A, 6/1/25,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-06-27 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide treatment to promote healing of an open skin impairment for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for skin conditions. (Resident 24) Finding includes: During an interview on 6/23/25 at 2:53 p.m., Resident 24 was laying on a low air loss mattress with a urinary drainage bag hung on the right side of the bed. Resident 24 indicated he had a wound in the crevice of his left lower buttock for approximately the last ten weeks. He was concerned it hadn't healed up. Resident 24's clinical record was reviewed on 6/24/25 at 2:53 p.m. Diagnoses included obstructive uropathy, infection and inflammatory reaction due to indwelling urethral catheter, and a personal history of other infectious and parasitic diseases. A discontinued order, initiated on 5/27/25 and discontinued on 6/8/25, indicated to cleanse wound to the left lower gluteal (buttock) fold with a wound cleanser, pat dry, apply skin preparation around the wound, collagen power (wound treatment) to the wound bed, and cover with a bordered dressing every three days…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-06-27 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
  Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure catheter care was provided in a manner to prevent contamination and failed to monitor urinary output for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for catheters. (Resident 33) Finding includes: During an observation on 6/23/25 at 3:53 p.m., Resident 33 was sitting up in his wheelchair with a urinary catheter bag hung below his wheelchair. Tea colored urine was observed in the urinary catheter tubing during the observation. During a catheter care observation on 6/25/25 from 11:44 a.m. to 12:00 p.m., upon entry to the room, washcloths and a bottle of peri skin cleanser were placed on the resident's overbed table, without a barrier, next to the resident's personal items, including his lunch tray. CNA 12 entered the resident's restroom, washed his hands, and donned a gown and gloves. With his gloved hands, he picked up the washcloths from the overbed table and took them into the restroom, turned on the faucet, got one cloth wet, turned off the facet, and returned to the resident's overbed table. He placed the washcloths…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-27 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
  Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure shift to shift narcotic reconciliation was completed for 4 of 4 medication carts reviewed for medication storage. (300 hall cart, 2nd 200 hall cart, Legacy Way cart, and 100 hall cart) Finding includes: 1. During a medication storage observation of the 300 hall cart, accompanied by LPN 5, on 6/23/25 at 9:36 a.m., the Narcotic Count Sheet was reviewed and the following dates lacked staff signatures for shift to shift reconciliation of controlled substances: In June 2025- 6/4/25: 6:00 a.m.- 2:00 p.m. and 2:00 p.m. - 10:00 p.m., 6/9/25: 6:30 p.m.- 10:30 p.m., 6/13/25: 10:00 p.m. - 6:00 a.m., 6/17/25: 2:00 p.m. - 10:00 p.m., 6/18/25: 10:00 p.m. - 6:00 a.m. During an interview at the time of the observation, LPN 5 indicated the sign in/sign out sheet was completed at each shift change. The outgoing nurse marked all incoming and outgoing cards and/or medications. The oncoming nurse and outgoing nurse completed a card count and signed the log to indicate the count was completed and correct. Review of the 300…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-06-27 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
  Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident was free of significant medication errors regarding the crushing of non-crushable medications for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for medication administration. (Resident 106) Resident 106's record was reviewed on 6/24/25 at 12:46 p.m. Current diagnoses included, atrial fibrillation, chronic kidney disease, hyperlipidemia, hypertension, and history of rectal cancer with colostomy. Current orders included: pantoprazole (stomach acid reducer) tablet, delayed release/ enteric coated (coated to not dissolve in stomach acid) 40 milligram (mg) twice a day started 6/20/25, potassium chloride (mineral supplement) extended release tablet 20 millequivalents (mEq) give 10 mEq once a day started 6/20/25, and may crush meds or open capsules as needed unless contraindicated, refer to Do Not Crush list. Resident 106's electronic medication administration record (eMAR) was reviewed on 6/27/25 at 10:18 a.m. from 6/20/25-6/26/25. All medications were documented as administered. A nursing progress note dated 6/20/25 at 3:48 a.m.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-06-27 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to date open insulin pens/vials, discard expired insulin pens/vials, and label medications with resident identifier information for 4 of 4 medication carts observed for medication storage. (300 hall cart, 2nd 200 hall cart, Legacy Way cart, and 100 hall cart) Finding includes: 1. During a medication storage observation of the 300 hall cart, accompanied by LPN 5, on [DATE] at 9:36 a.m., the following was observed: an unlabeled box of over the counter Coricidin BHP (cough and cold medication) and one unlabeled 30 ounce (oz) tube of Biofreeze (menthol pain gel). LPN 5 indicated she was not sure why these medication were not labeled. Medications without appropriate resident labels should be discarded immediately. 2. During a medication storage observation of the 2nd half 200 hall cart, accompanied by LPN 6, on [DATE] at 9:44 a.m., the following was observed: one unlabelled 100 milligram (mg)/milliliter (ml) vial of furosemide (a diuretic) injection solution,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-06-27 · tag F0773 — isolated
  Provide or obtain laboratory tests/services when ordered and promptly tell the ordering practitioner of the results.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to notify the provider of an abnormal urine culture, resulting in a delay of care for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for urinary catheters. (Resident 33) Finding includes: Resident 33's clinical record was reviewed on 6/26/25 at 8:43 a.m. Diagnoses included obstructive and reflux uropathy, chronic kidney disease stage 3, hydronephrosis with renal and ureteral calculous obstruction, and bacteremia. Current orders included indwelling urinary catheter for neurogenic bladder (8/19/24), urinalysis complete one time (6/16/25), urine culture one time (6/16/25), ceftriaxone (antibiotic) 2 gram reconstitued solution inject 2 gram once daily (6/26/25). Review of a urinalysis, collected 6/16/25, indicated an abnormal result. The abnormal result was reported to the facility on 6/17/25. Review of the urine culture, collected 6/16/25, indicated an abnormal result of >100,000 colony forming units per milliliter (CFU/ml) of Hafnia alvei (bacteria) and 50,000 - 100,000 CFU/ml of Excherichia coli (bacteria). The abnormal result with…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-06-27 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow enhanced barrier precautions and infection control practices during wound care to prevent potential infection for 1 of 3 resident's reviewed for pressure ulcers. (Resident 24) Finding includes: During an interview on 6/23/25 at 2:53 p.m., Resident 24 was in bed with a urinary drainage bag hung on the right side of the resident's bed. His door contained an Enhanced Barrier Precaution (EBP) sign. The sign indicated providers and staff must perform hand hygiene and wear gloves and a gown for high-contact care activities. Resident 24's clinical record was reviewed on 6/24/25 at 2:53 p.m. Diagnoses included obstructive uropathy, infection and inflammatory reaction due to indwelling urethral catheter, and a personal history of other infectious and parasitic diseases. Current orders included staff were required to use enhanced barrier precautions, wearing a gown and gloves at minimum during high contact care activities, cleanse moisture acquired skin damage (MASD) to the groin with wound cleanser or normal…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-08-23 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure consistent documentation and communication related to a resident's choice for advance directives for 1 of 8 residents reviewed for advance directives (Resident 35). Finding include: Resident 35's record was reviewed on [DATE] at 2:26 p.m. Diagnoses included rhabdomyolosis, severe sepsis with septic shock, acute respiratory failure with hypoxia, type 2 diabetes mellitus with diabetic chronic kidney disease, and unspecified dysphagia. A physician order, dated [DATE], included a code status of Full Code (perform Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation or CPR). A current face sheet indicated he was a full code. A current electronic Continuity of Care document in the electronic health record indicated he had signed a Do Not Resuscitate (DNR) form. The resident's current code status care plan, dated [DATE], indicated that the resident/ resident representative had chosen his advance directives to include a code status of full code and those advance directives…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-08-23 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement preventative measures following an injury of unknown origin for 1 of 1 residents reviewed for injuries of unknown origin (Resident 24). Findings include: Resident 24's clinical record was reviewed on 8/20/24 at 3:33 p.m. Current diagnoses included dementia and Parkinson's Disease. The resident had an order for one antiplatelet medication, aspirin 81 mg taken one time daily. A 5/8/24, quarterly, Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment indicated the resident was severely cognitively impaired, had mobility impairment in both the upper and lower extremities, and required staff assistance for bed mobility. A 7/29/24, 12:18 p.m., progress note indicated, while providing care, a CNA had observed a 9.5 centimeter (cm) long by 12 cm wide bruise on the inside of the resident's right knee. The bruise was purple/black in color. The bruise was tender to touch. The charge nurse was informed of the bruise. A 7/29/24, Wound Management Detail Report indicated the resident had a 9.5 cm by 12 cm black and purple bruise.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to TRILOGY HEALTH SERVICES — 123 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 16 rows in the source record cover these 15 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

4 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $1.7M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 15% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in IN