No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Villages At Historic Silvercrest The

1 Silvercrest Drive, New Albany, IN 47150 · For profit - Corporation · 56 certified beds · (812) 542-6720 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (812) 542-6720 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse/neglect citation on record (F0600) — cited Dec 2023
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • a strong health-inspection score (4/5) — the hardest rating to game (though it’s ranked within its own state, not nationally)
  • no harm-level citations in the current inspection record
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
Worth asking about
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Dec 2023
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

4/5
CMS overall
4 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 4 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 1 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 5 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★ 3/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
1915 West St Ste A · (812) 725-7034 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
2015 State St · (812) 945-0535 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
Kroger0.9 mi
200 New Albany Plz · (812) 948-2817 · Call to confirm hours
Park
50 Daisy, Summit St · (812) 948-5360 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
725 Linden St · (812) 945-3630

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 5 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 5 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 5 to 4 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating4★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased12.5%11.0%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight7.1%5.5%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%0.4%0.9%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.0%1.1%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms8.0%25.2%6.5%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.0%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury10.1%3.9%3.3%worse
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened16.1%11.9%16.1%typical
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication42.1%23.5%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine96.2%95.4%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers1.1%3.6%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control23.2%23.3%21.2%typical
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table15.9%13.6%17.1%typical
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication1.1%1.2%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine87.3%79.0%79.4%typical
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission26.4%22.2%22.6%worse
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit7.8%10.8%12.0%better
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days1.191.611.67better
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days0.941.441.80better

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

62.4% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 285 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

62.4%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
12.2%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
93.4%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.56U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.24hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.24hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.08hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 93.4% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 122 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.56 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 86% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 3% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF62.4%CMS range 57.5–67.051.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024better than U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF12.2%CMS range 9.0–15.310.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge93.4%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge91.0%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge93.4%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting100.0%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay2.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened0.0%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization7.6%CMS range 5.4–10.57.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.251.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.65
RN hours/ resident / day
0.97
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.37
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.99
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.57
RN hoursweekends
52.5%
Total nursing turnover
54.5%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 56 beds and averages 48.4 residents a day — about 86% occupied, or roughly 8 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.99 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.65 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.37 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.33 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.25 on weekdays — 22% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.68 to 0.57 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 52% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 2 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

2
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-07-30)
2
at the previous standard inspection (2024-07-22)

Deficiencies are unchanged from the previous inspection. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

14 citations, most serious first — scroll within the box to see all.

  • Potential for harm · D2025-07-30 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents were treated with dignity and respect for 1 of 12 residents reviewed for dignity. (Resident 52) Findings include:The record for Resident 52 was reviewed on 7/25/2025 at 9:56 a.m. The resident's diagnoses included, but were not limited to, arthrodesis status, cervical disc disorder with myelopathy of the cervical region, spondylosis with radiculopathy of the lumbar region, spinal stenosis of the lumbar region with neurogenic claudication, stage 3 chronic kidney disease, pulmonary fibrosis, severe morbid obesity, and anxiety disorder. The care plan, dated 6/2/25, indicated the resident was at risk for pain related to spinal stenosis, cervical fusion, and radiculopathy. The interventions, dated 6/2/25, included, but were not limited to, administer medications as ordered and notify the physician for any side effects observed or the lack of effectiveness, attempt non-pharmacological interventions, notify the physician of increased pain, observe for and record verbal and non-verbal signs of pain, and reposition…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-07-30 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure narcotics were administered by physician's order, to obtain nursing permission, or document the narcotic count was accurate for 1 of 25 residents reviewed for medication administration. (Resident 52) Findings include:The record for Resident 52 was reviewed on 7/25/2025 at 9:56 a.m. The resident's diagnoses included, but were not limited to, arthrodesis status, cervical disc disorder with myelopathy of the cervical region, spondylosis with radiculopathy of the lumbar region, spinal stenosis of the lumbar region with neurogenic claudication, stage 3 chronic kidney disease, pulmonary fibrosis, severe morbid obesity, and anxiety disorder. The care plan, dated 6/2/25, indicated the resident was at risk for pain related to spinal stenosis, cervical fusion, and radiculopathy. The interventions, dated 6/2/25, included, but were not limited to, administer medications as ordered and notify the physician for any side effects observed or the lack of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-04-15 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure kitchen equipment, related to the ovens, were properly cleaned and maintained to prevent a fire from occurring. This deficient practice had the potential to affect 36 of 36 residents currently residing on the skilled nursing units. Findings include: Review of the State Complaint Report, dated 4/3/25, indicated at 5:00 a.m., a fire occurred in the right-side oven in the first-floor main kitchen. A hand-held fire extinguisher was utilized by the cook and the fire was put out. The local Fire Department arrived a few minutes later. Upon inspection of the oven, it was clean, but the Director of Food Services discovered a panel in the bottom of the oven that could be removed and cleaned. Some grease was seen on the panel and the bracket which held the panel. During an interview, on 4/15/25 at 9:45 a.m., the [NAME] 1, who was also present the day of the fire, indicated the fire happened the day after all the big storms at around 5:15 a.m. Due to the storms, the convection ovens and range hood were not able to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-18 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to identify an abnormal bowel pattern for a resident (Resident B) with a previous diagnosis of C-diff for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for quality of care. Findings include: The clinical record for Resident B was reviewed on 12/16/24 at 10:03 a.m. The resident's diagnoses included, but were not limited to, irritable bowel syndrome and a history of C-diff (Clostridium difficile). The progress note, dated 9/15/24 at 3:10 p.m., indicated the resident was confused with incoherent speech. The nurse practitioner was notified with a new order given for a urine dispstick. The dipstick results were communicated to the nurse practitioner with new orders for Macrobid (antibiotic for urinary tract infections) 100 mg (milligrams) twice daily for 5 days and Rocephin (antibiotic for urinary tract infections) 1 gram intramuscularly once. The progress note, dated 9/18/24 at 2:12 p.m., indicated the nurse practitioner reviewed the final urinalysis. New orders were obtained to discontinue the Macrobid and to Start Ciprofloxacin 1,000 mg daily for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-07-22 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure the kitchen equipment was clean and free from grease and food particles for 3 of 3 kitchen observations. This deficient practice had the potential to affect 46 residents currently residing on the 200 and 300 Halls. Findings include: During an initial tour of the kitchen on 7/15/24 at 9:28 a.m., the following was observed: -A saucer sized whitish/yellow unknown mound was observed on the floor behind the double door heating oven. -Aluminum foil was in the drip pan under the stove top. - The stove top burners had a buildup of black charcoal, which had crackled on the surface area in the back of the burners. -The grill had black grease on the front surface of the grill grates and there was a buildup of black charcoal chunks between the grates. -The deep fryer had food particles on the front edge counter of the grease basin. -The vents had dust hanging down between the stove top and the steam table and preparation area. There were black areas in the vent holes above the area between the grill, stove, and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-22 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to monitor and appropriately document observation of the resident's urinary output for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for bladder incontinence. (Resident 11) Findings include: The record for Resident 11 was reviewed on 7/21/24 at 1:30 p.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, sepsis, urinary tract infection, acute kidney failure, overactive bladder, and dementia. The care plan, dated 5/6/24, indicated the resident experienced episodes of incontinence. The interventions included, but were not limited to encourage fluids unless contraindicated, observe for signs and symptoms of UTI (Urinary Tract Infection) and notify the physician as needed, observe skin and report any signs of breakdown as needed, offer and assist with toileting as needed and/or per request, provide incontinence care as needed, and provide incontinence products as needed. The physicians' orders, dated 5/6/24, indicated to monitor urinary output due to the removal of the resident's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-12-15 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff to resident neglect did not occur for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for abuse. (Resident C) Findings include: The clinical record for Resident C was reviewed on 12/14/23 at 1:51 p.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, left patella fracture, rheumatoid arthritis and anxiety. The incident report, dated 11/18/23 at 9:01 p.m., indicated Resident C voiced care concerns and called her family member with her personal cell phone. The family member called the facility and spoke with LPN (Licensed Practical Nurse) 4 whom worked the floor. CNA (Certified Nursing Aide) 3 was removed from her care. The care plan, dated 11/13/23, indicated the resident required staff assistance with activities of daily living and to assist with toileting as needed and/or per request. On 12/14/23 at 1:15 p.m., the resident was observed resting in bed with her eyes open. left knee immobilizer in place and her call light in reach. The resident indicated, on 11/18/23, she had to go to the bathroom and turned her call…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Potential for harm · D2023-09-28 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to notify the physician of a critical laboratory result for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for Notification of Change. (Resident B) Findings include: The clinical record for Resident B was reviewed on 9/26/23 at 10:30 a.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, presence of cardiac pacemaker, hypertensive heart and chronic kidney disease with heart failure and stage 1 through stage 4 chronic kidney disease, heart failure, long term (current) use of anticoagulants, and chronic atrial fibrillation. The Annual MDS (Minimum Data Set) assessment, dated 3/23/23, indicated the resident was cognitively intact. The physician's orders, dated 4/10/23, 4/11/23 and 4/14/23 indicated the resident was to have a PT/INR (Prothrombin ratio and international normalized ratio) per coagulation machine. If the INR was greater than 8.0 staff were to obtain a laboratory blood draw. The resident was on Warfarin 3 mg (milligram) once a day for atrial fibrillation with a start date of 2/5/23. The care plan, dated 8/29/17 and last revised 3/29/23,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-09-28 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident received adequate supervision and interventions were properly implemented to prevent accidents for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for accidents. (Resident B) Findings include: The record for Resident B was reviewed on 9/26/23 at 10:30 a.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, presence of cardiac pacemaker, hypertensive heart and chronic kidney disease with heart failure and stage 1 through stage 4 chronic kidney disease, heart failure, long term (current) use of anticoagulants, and chronic atrial fibrillation. The Annual MDS (Minimum Data Set) assessment, dated 3/23/23, indicated the resident was cognitively intact. The physician's order, dated 2/6/23, indicated the resident was to have two staff assistance during toileting; and dated 7/29/21, the resident was to have two staff assistance if the resident has periods of weakness. The care plan, dated 8/29/27 and revised on 3/29/23, indicated the resident was at risk for falls related to decreased mobility, weakness, medications, edema, pain, and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-06-12 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident's blood sugar levels were tested at the appropriate time sequence as ordered by the physician, related to every two hours for three days, for 1 of 12 residents reviewed for quality of care. (Resident 32) Findings include: The clinical record for Resident 32 was reviewed on 6/9/23 at 9:54 a.m. The diagnosis included, but was not limited to, Diabetes Mellitus type 1. The Quarterly MDS (Minimum Data Set), dated 4/17/23, indicated the resident was severely cognitively impaired. The care plan, dated 11/1/22 and revised on 5/31/23, indicated Resident 32 was at risk for hypoglycemia and hyperglycemia related to Diabetes Mellitus. The interventions included, but were not limited to, laboratory test per physician orders, medications per orders, and monitor blood sugars per physician orders. The physician's orders, dated 1/3/23, indicated staff were to obtain a blood sugar q (every) 2 hours for 24 hours a day for 3 days. Fax over the results to the physician after completed for the 3 days. Twelve times a day at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-06-12 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure proper maintenance of a catheter and drainage system was off the floor for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for bowel and bladder. (Resident 29) Findings include: The record for Resident 29 was reviewed on 6/7/23 at 10:14 a.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to bacteremia, acute kidney failure, chronic kidney disease stage 3, altered mental status, urine retention, and neuromuscular dysfunction of bladder. The care plan, dated 2/2/23, indicated the resident used a catheter due to urinary retention related to neurogenic bladder. The interventions included, but were not limited to, maintain a closed system with urinary bag below the residents bladder and cover, observe for any signs of complication such as UTI (Urinary Tract Infection), urethral trauma, strictures, bladder calculi or silent hydronephrosis, observe tubing and avoid any obstructions, and provide assistance with catheter care and change catheter per physician orders. The physician's order, dated 2/2/23, indicated the resident had a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-06-12 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure emergency respiratory supplies were available for a resident with a tracheostomy for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for Respiratory Care. (Resident 35) Findings include: The record for Resident 35 was reviewed on 6/6/23 at 1:13 p.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, COPD (chronic obstructive pulmonary disease), pleural effusion, chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia, chronic bronchitis, chronic cough, shortness of breath, history of COVID-19, and encounter for attention to tracheostomy. The admission MDS (Minimum Data Set) assessment, dated 3/23/23, indicated the resident was cognitively intact and required assistance with oxygen therapy, suctioning, and tracheostomy care. The care plan, initiated on 3/24/23, indicated the resident had a potential for complications related to having a tracheostomy. The interventions included, but were not limited to, assess lung sounds and report any wheezes, crackles, or decreased breath sounds; avoid unnecessary diagnostic or therapeutic procedures and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-06-12 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolated
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure expired foods were removed from service related to the mustard, fruit cups and mango chunks. This deficient practice had the potential to affect 46 of 48 residents receiving regular diets. Findings include: During a tour of the kitchen on 6/5/23 at 9:45 a.m., with the Dietary Manager the following was observed: -In the dry goods storage room sitting on the dry goods storage shelf was a bottle of mustard with an indicated use by date 5/10/23. -The Dietary Manager indicated there was another bottle of the mustard open in the stand-alone refrigerator. The bottle had a use by date of 5/10/23. -In the steam tables' refrigerator, there were 2 fruit cups with a use by date of 6/4/23. -In the freezer there was an open bag of mango chunks with a hand-written use by date of 1/25/23. During an interview on 6/5/23 a 2:07 p.m., Resident D indicated last week she did have one instance where she got the wrong food, and then she got a fruit cup that had a sticker with a use by date for the previous day. It was prepared 4 days prior.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-06-12 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — isolated
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure an electrical outlet was maintained in a safe, functioning manner during 2 of 2 observations of the laundry room. This deficient practice had the potential to affect all 48 residents currently residing at the facility. Findings include: During an observation of the laundry room on 6/9/23 at 12:11 p.m., the electrical outlet behind the washing machines was observed to have black scorch marks on the two bottom electrical sockets. The top two sockets were unable to be visualized as they were currently in use with the detergent dispensers plugged into them. During an interview on 6/9/23 at 12:15 p.m., Laundry Aide 11 indicated one of the detergent dispensers had shorted out and they were having to load the detergent manually into the machine. She thought there was a work order in on the outlet. She believed the top two outlets were okay to use. She thought the Director of Plant Operations (DPO) and the Housekeeping Supervisor were aware. During an interview on 6/9/23 at 12:19 p.m., the Housekeeping Supervisor indicated he…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to TRILOGY HEALTH SERVICES — 123 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 4 of 54.2-0.2 vs chain
Health inspection 4 of 53.5+0.5 vs chain
Staffing 1 of 53.3-2.3 vs chain
Quality measures 5 of 54.8+0.2 vs chain
The other 122 homes this chain runs (chain average 4.2★, per CMS)
1 of 5Heritage TheFindlay, OH 1 of 5The Oaks Rehabilitation and Healthcare CenterZanesville, OH 2 of 5Homewood Health CampusLebanon, IN 2 of 5Violet Springs Health CampusPickerington, OH 2 of 5Woodmont Health CampusBoonville, IN 3 of 5Cobblestone Crossings Health CampusTerre Haute, IN 3 of 5Creasy Springs Health CampusLafayette, IN 3 of 5Cumberland Pointe Health CampusWest Lafayette, IN 3 of 5Forest Park Health CampusRichmond, IN 3 of 5Franciscan Health Care CenterLouisville, KY 3 of 5Greenleaf Health CampusElkhart, IN 3 of 5River Terrace Health CampusMadison, IN 3 of 5Scenic Hills At The MonasteryFerdinand, IN 3 of 5Smiths Mill Health CampusNew Albany, OH 3 of 5Springhurst Health CampusGreenfield, IN 3 of 5Springs Of Richmond, TheRichmond, IN 3 of 5St Mary Healthcare CenterLafayette, IN 3 of 5Stonegate Health CampusLapeer, MI 3 of 5Sun Prairie Senior LivingSun Prairie, WI 3 of 5Taylor Springs Health CampusGahanna, OH 3 of 5The Willows at Fritz FarmLexington, KY 3 of 5The Willows at HamburgLexington, KY 3 of 5The Willows at HarrodsburgHarrodsburg, KY 3 of 5The Willows at SpringhurstLouisville, KY 3 of 5Villages At Oak Ridge, TheWashington, IN 3 of 5Waunakee Valley Senior LivingWaunakee, WI 3 of 5Wellbrooke Of CarmelCarmel, IN 4 of 5Arlington Place Health CampusIndianapolis, IN 4 of 5Ashford Place Health CampusShelbyville, IN 4 of 5Aspen Place Health CampusGreensburg, IN 4 of 5Avalon Springs Health CampusValparaiso, IN 4 of 5Bethany Pointe Health CampusAnderson, IN 4 of 5Blair Ridge Health CampusPeru, IN 4 of 5Bridgepointe Health CampusVincennes, IN 4 of 5Cedar Creek Health CampusLowell, IN 4 of 5Clearvista Lake Health CampusIndianapolis, IN 4 of 5Forest Springs Health CampusLouisville, KY 4 of 5Glen Oaks Health CampusNew Castle, IN 4 of 5Glen Ridge Health CampusLouisville, KY 4 of 5Meadows Of Delphos TheDelphos, OH

Showing 40 of 122; lowest-rated first.

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
WITHAM MEMORIAL HOSPITALOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST100%since 01/01/2015
KEYBANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATIONOrganization5% OR GREATER MORTGAGE INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFsince 05/01/2023
BAYSTON, BRETTIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 01/01/2023
BRAND, JOHNIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 01/01/2015
CASTETTER, ANDREAIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 01/01/2023
HAWKINS, CLAUDEIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 09/09/2013
HORNBECKER, MICHAELIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 01/01/2024
REAGAN, JULIEIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 09/25/2024
BARDOCZI, STEPHENIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 09/03/2013
BRAVERMAN, KELLYIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 12/01/2021
SELLERS, DANIELIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 06/20/2024
TRILOGY HEALTHCARE OF FLOYD LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 01/01/2015
TRILOGY HEALTHCARE OF FLOYD, LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2015
MILLER, STEPHANIEIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/24/2025
SALCEDO, FEDERICOIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 07/15/2025
BARNEY, LEIGHIndividualINDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNFsince 09/10/2025
DAVIS, DAVIDIndividualINDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNFsince 09/10/2025
AMERICAN HEALTHCARE REIT HOLDINGS LPOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 12/01/2015
AMERICAN HEALTHCARE REIT INCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 10/01/2018
CONTINENTAL MERGER SUB LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 10/01/2021
GAHC3 TRILOGY JV LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 12/01/2015
GAHC4 TRILOGY JV LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 10/01/2018
PARAGON OUTPATIENT REHABILITATION SERVICES LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 12/01/2015
TRILOGY HEALTH SERVICES LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 06/28/2019
TRILOGY HEALTHCARE MASTER TENANT IX LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 07/07/2025
TRILOGY INVESTORS LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 12/01/2015
TRILOGY MANAGEMENT SERVICES LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 10/15/2025
TRILOGY PROPCO FINANCE LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 06/28/2019
TRILOGY PROPERTY HOLDINGS LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 06/28/2019
TRILOGY REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUSTOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 12/01/2015
TRILOGY REIT HOLDINGS LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 12/01/2015

CMS files one row per role, so the 35 rows in the source record cover these 31 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

18 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$12.5M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-7.0%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$1.6M
Related-party expense12% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 11%Medicare 23%Other / private 66%

This home reported $1.6M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 12% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$444per resident / day
operating cost
$13,496per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$415per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in IN

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Indiana Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Indiana
$8,943/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$10,326/mo
Nursing home (private)
$5,639/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 155813. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-07-30, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next