Riveroaks Health Campus

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

60.2% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 117 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 69.2% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 91 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.33 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 55% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 8% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 68 beds and averages 52.0 residents a day — about 76% occupied, or roughly 16 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.27 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 1.27 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.74 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.65 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.52 on weekdays — 25% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 1.46 to 0.82 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 36% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

20 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 10 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · D2025-12-22 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
  Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the physician was notified during a change in condition for 1 of 1 residents reviewed for closed records. (Resident 57)Finding includes: On 12/16/25 at 2:23 P.M., Resident 57's clinical record was reviewed. Resident 57 was admitted on [DATE]. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, encephalopathy. The most recent admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment, dated 9/10/25, indicated Resident 57 was cognitively intact. Physician orders included, but were not limited to: lactulose solution 45mL (milliliters) oral three times a day; Start date 9/12/25 The electronic medication administration record (eMAR) indicated the following dates Resident 57 refused lactulose medication:10/3/25 12:21 P.M.10/4/25 11:55 A.M.10/8/25 8:26 A.M.10/8/25 12:20 P.M.10/10/25 3:42 P.M.10/10/25 6:48 P.M.10/11/25 7:31 A.M. The clinical record lacked physician notification of refusal of medications for the above attempted medication administrations. A physician note,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-12-22 · tag F0641 — isolated
  Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessments were completed accurately for 1 of 4 residents reviewed for pressure ulcers and 2 of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. (Resident 4, Resident 3, and Resident 42)Findings include: 1. On 12/16/25 at 10:33 A.M., Resident 4's clinical record was reviewed. Resident 4 was admitted on [DATE]. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, generalized anxiety disorder. The most recent Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment, dated 9/19/25, indicated Resident 4 was cognitively impaired and received antianxiety medication during the 7-day lookback period. Physician orders included, but were not limited to: lorazepam (antianxiety medication) tablet 0.5 mg (milligrams) one tablet oral at bedtime; Start date 12/12/24 The electronic Medication Administration Record (eMAR) from 9/13/25 to 9/19/25 was reviewed. The resident received lorazepam 0.5 mg seven out of seven days. 2. On 12/16/25 at 2:03 P.M., Resident…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-12-22 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop a comprehensive care plan for 1 of 5 residents reviewed for medications. (Resident 3) A resident receiving a long-term prophylactic antibiotic did not have a care plan in place to address the antibiotic medication.Finding includes: On 12/16/25 at 2:03 P.M., Resident 3's clinical record was reviewed. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, hypertensive chronic kidney disease and urinary retention. The most current Significant Change Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment, dated 10/4/25, indicated Resident 3 was cognitively intact and received an antibiotic medication during the 7-day lookback period. Physician orders included, but were not limited to:ciprofloxacin (an antibiotic medication) 250 milligram (mg) - Give one tablet by mouth once a day on the 24th of the month, dated 9/30/25ciprofloxacin 500 mg tablet - Give one tablet by mouth twice a day, dated 9/28/25 and discontinued on 9/30/25ciprofloxacin 500 mg tablet - Give one tablet by mouth twice a day, dated 9/30/25 and discontinued on 10/2/25A care conference…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-22 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
  Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure care plan interventions were revised following a fall for 1 of 4 residents reviewed for falls. (Resident 12) A resident's care plan was not updated with a new intervention after a fall.Finding includes:On 12/16/25 at 12:55 P.M., Resident 12's clinical record was reviewed. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, Parkinson's disease and dementia. The most current Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment, dated 11/20/25, indicated Resident 12 had mild cognitive impairment, required substantial to maximal assistance of staff (staff does more than half of the effort) with toileting and transferring, and had two or more falls without injury since the prior assessment. A care plan conference was completed on 12/3/25 with Resident 12's representative attending via phone call. Care plans were reviewed.A risk for falling care plan, initiated 1/2/25, included, but was not limited to, the following interventions:Therapy evaluation and treatment as needed, dated 1/2/25Ensure Dycem (a non-slip pad) is in place in…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-12-22 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
  Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were monitored for side effects of high-risk medications for 1 of 5 residents reviewed for medications. (Resident 3) A resident was not monitored for side effects of antibiotic, antiplatelet, diuretic, and antianxiety medications.Finding includes:On 12/16/25 at 12:03 P.M., Resident 3's clinical record was reviewed. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, hypertensive chronic kidney disease, urinary retention, congestive heart failure, and anxiety disorder. The most current Significant Change Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment, dated 10/4/25, indicated Resident 3 was cognitively intact and received an antibiotic, diuretic, antiplatelet, and anticonvulsant medication and did not receive an antianxiety medication during the 7-day look back period.A care conference was completed on 10/24/25 with the resident's family member in attendance. Care plans were reviewed.The clinical record included, but were not limited to, the following care plans:Resident receives diuretic medication related to congestive heart…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-22 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
  Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure documentation was complete or accurate for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for closed records. (Resident 57) Finding includes: On 12/16/25 at 2:23 P.M., Resident 57's clinical record was reviewed. Resident 57 was admitted on [DATE]. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, encephalopathy. The most recent admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment, dated 9/10/25, indicated Resident 57 was cognitively intact. Physician orders included, but were not limited to: lactulose solution 45mL oral three times a day; Start date 9/12/25 The electronic medication administration record (eMAR) indicated the following dates lactulose medication was recorded as unavailable:10/1/25 11:07 A.M.10/1/25 6:48 P.M.10/6/25 8:35 P.M.10/7/25 7:51 A.M.10/7/25 11:22 A.M.10/7/25 7:45 P.M. During an interview on 12/9/25 at 10:28 A.M., the Director of Nursing indicated staff could not remember Resident 57's lactulose medication being unavailable, and believe the missed…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2024-10-04 · tag F0882 — widespread
  Designate a qualified infection preventionist to be responsible for the infection prevent and control program in the nursing home.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure designation of a certified Infection Preventionist (IP). The IP had not received specialized training in infection prevention and control when starting as the IP. This had the potential to affect 56 of 56 residents residing in the facility. Finding includes: On 10/4/24 at 9:38 A.M., the Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) indicated that she was currently responsible for the infection prevention and control program in the facility. She indicated she was able to dedicate approximately 5-10 hours per week on the infection control program. On 10/4/24 at 11:25 A.M., the ADON's employee record was reviewed. The ADON had begun the role as IP on 6/4/24, prior to obtaining her IP certification on 6/17/24. On 7/17/24 the ADON was promoted from IP to ADON. The lack of a dedicated Infection Preventionist resulted in Enhanced Barrier Precautions not being implemented. Cross Reference F880. On 10/4/24 at 12:25 P.M., the Administrator provided a document titled Infection Prevention and Control Program, dated 11/10/17, that…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-10-04 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to implement infection control practices for 6 of 6 residents reviewed for EBP (Enhanced Barrier Precautions). Signs were not posted, orders were not initiated, and gowns were not worn during high contact activities. (Resident T, Resident S, Resident D, Resident L, Resident W, Resident V) Findings included: 1. On 9/30/24 at 1:48 P.M., during a random observation there was no EBP sign on Resident L's door. On 10/1/24 at 9:00 A.M., during a random observation there was no EBP sign on Resident L's door. On 10/02/24 at 10:28 A.M., during a random observation there was no EBP sign on Resident L's door. On 10/2/24 at 10:11 A.M., Resident L's clinical record was reviewed. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, anemia, COPD (Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease), and generalized edema. Current Physician included but were not limited to: - Staff to use enhanced barrier precautions, wearing a gown and gloves at minimum during high-contact care activities twice a day, initiated 9/28/24. The Care Plans included,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-10-04 · tag F0623 — isolated
  Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a notice of transfer was completed for 1 of 4 residents reviewed for hospital transfers. (Resident 21) Finding includes: On 10/2/24 at 10:34 A.M., Resident 21's clinical record was reviewed. The diagnosis included, but was not limited, to encephalopathy. The most recent Quarterly MDS (Minimum Data Set) assessment, dated 8/28/24, indicated Resident 21 was moderately cognitively intact. A nursing progress note, dated 8/16/24 at 2:04 P.M., indicated Resident 21 had returned from the dentist after oral surgery. On 10/3/24 at 1:51 P.M., Regional Support 27 provided transfer discharge paperwork sent with Resident 21 to his appointment on 8/16/24. Notice of Transfer or Discharge and Notice of Transfer Discharge Request for Hearing were blank and did not include any resident information or reason for transfer. On 10/4/24 at 11:23 A.M., Regional Support 27 provided a document titled Guidelines for Transfer and Discharge, dated 5/3/17, that indicated to record the reason for, the effective date of transfer or discharge, and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-10-04 · tag F0635 — isolated
  Provide doctor's orders for the resident's immediate care at the time the resident was admitted.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure a newly admitted resident had immediate orders for an indwelling urinary catheter for 1 of 1 residents reviewed for urinary catheters. (Resident D) Findings include: On 9/30/24 at 9:40 A.M., staff was observed to be transferring Resident D. Resident D was observed to have a urinary catheter at that time. On 10/1/24 at 3:00 P.M., Resident D's clinical record was reviewed. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, facial/skull fracture, subdural hemorrhage (type of brain bleed), and subarachnoid hemorrhage (type of brain bleed). Resident D was admitted [DATE] Resident D's clinical record lacked orders for an indwelling urinary catheter and/or catheter care. On 10/3/24 at 10:30 A.M., Resident D's clinical record was reviewed. A Nursing Assessment, dated 10/2/24 at 12:37 A.M., indicated Resident D did not have an indwelling urinary catheter. On 10/3/23 at 12:39 P.M., Regional Support RN indicated catheters would have been…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to TRILOGY HEALTH SERVICES — 123 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 36 rows in the source record cover these 29 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

21 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $1.1M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 13% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in IN