No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Covered Bridge Health Campus

1675 W Tipton St, Seymour, IN 47274 · Government - County · 78 certified beds · (812) 523-6405 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (812) 523-6405 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse-prevention, restraint, or reporting citation — no harm found (F0609) — cited Dec 2023
Insights

On the public record, this home looks stronger than most — but visit before you decide.

In its favor
  • a strong health-inspection score (4/5) — the hardest rating to game (though it’s ranked within its own state, not nationally)
  • no harm-level citations in the current inspection record
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
  • a high payroll-based staffing rating (4/5)
  • lower-than-typical staff turnover (19% vs 45% nationally) — better care continuity
Worth asking about
  • it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

5/5
CMS overall
5 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 4 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 4 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 5 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★★ 4/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
225 S Pine St., 2nd Floor, Ste 200 · (812) 524-4265 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
1101 C Ave W · (812) 522-2762 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
Jay C1.0 mi
1181 W Tipton St · (812) 522-2883 · Call to confirm hours
Park
800 E Block State Rd · (812) 522-6420 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 5 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 5 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 5 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating5★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased8.5%11.0%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight3.6%5.5%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%0.4%0.9%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.0%1.1%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms1.4%25.2%6.5%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.0%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury1.9%3.9%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened4.7%11.9%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication22.9%23.5%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine97.9%95.4%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers0.8%3.6%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control22.7%23.3%21.2%typical
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table17.4%13.6%17.1%typical
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication1.4%1.2%1.4%typical
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine97.2%79.0%79.4%better
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission20.7%22.2%22.6%typical
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit9.6%10.8%12.0%better
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days1.031.611.67better
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days2.451.441.80worse

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

72.3% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 104 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

72.3%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
10.3%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
78.8%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.38U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.17hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.16hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.05hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 78.8% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 52 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.38 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 66% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 16% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF72.3%CMS range 66.0–79.051.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024better than U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF10.3%CMS range 7.8–14.910.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge78.8%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge80.8%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge61.5%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting100.0%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened0.0%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization6.5%CMS range 3.5–12.17.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.081.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

1.11
RN hours/ resident / day
0.59
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.55
Aide hours/ resident / day
4.25
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.58
RN hoursweekends
18.8%
Total nursing turnover
18.2%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 78 beds and averages 50.6 residents a day — about 65% occupied, or roughly 27 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.25 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 1.11 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.55 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.67 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.48 on weekdays — 18% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.32 to 0.58 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 19% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

5
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-02-12)
4
at the previous standard inspection (2025-01-23)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

11 citations, most serious first — scroll within the box to see all.

  • Potential for harm · E2026-02-12 · tag F0628 — pattern
    Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to notify the Ombudsman that residents were discharged from the facility for 3 of 3 discharged residents' records reviewed. (Residents 63, 64, and 65) Findings include:1. The clinical record for Resident 63 was reviewed on [DATE] at 11:53 A.M. The resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. A Progress Note, dated [DATE] at 6:07 A.M., indicated the resident experienced a change of condition and was sent to the local hospital's emergency department for evaluation.A Progress Note, dated [DATE] at 5:21 P.M., indicated the resident was admitted to the hospital. The Census section of the resident's Electronic Health Record (EHR) indicated the resident was discharged from the facility on [DATE] and the resident was not anticipated to return. The Discharge Report sent to the Ombudsman for [DATE] was provided by the Director of Nursing (DON) on [DATE] at 11:44 A.M. The report did not include Resident 63.2. The clinical record for Resident 64 was reviewed on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-02-12 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to follow manufacturers guidelines related to priming an insulin pen for 1 of 2 insulin pens observed. (Resident 55)Findings include: Medication administration was observed on 02/11/2026 at 11:03 A.M., with Qualified Medication Aide (QMA) 5. The QMA prepared insulin for Resident 55 using an insulin pen and indicated the resident was to receive 3 units of lispro (Humalog) insulin per the sliding scale. The QMA removed the insulin pen from the medication cart, checked the label, removed the pen cap, cleaned the end of the pen with an alcohol wipe, applied the needle, and removed the cap of the needle. She turned the pen dose selector to two units, primed the pen holding the pen tip facing parallel to the floor, squirted out the two units of insulin, turned the pen dose selector to 3 units, donned gloves, and went into the resident's room. The QMA administered the insulin into the resident's abdomen. During an interview, with QMA 5, immediately following the procedure, she indicated she was not trained on how to hold the pen when…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-02-12 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, that facility failed to follow a physician's order related to a blood thinning medication administration for 1 of 6 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. (Resident 20)Findings include:The clinical record for Resident 20 was reviewed on 02/09/2026 at 11:46 A.M. An admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 01/09/2026, indicated the resident was cognitively intact. The resident's diagnoses included, but were not limited to, hip and knee replacement and deep vein thrombosis (blood clot - DVT). A Hospital Discharge summary, dated [DATE], indicated the resident had a total right hip replacement on 12/30/2025. The resident was to be given Lovenox (blood thinning medication) 40 milligrams (mg) once a day until the resident's INR (International Normalized Ratio, a standardized blood test result that measures how long it takes for your blood to clot) level was greater than 2.0. The resident had problems with deep vein thrombosis. The resident's next INR level was to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-12 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to appropriately store medications for 1 of 3 medication carts reviewed. (100 Hall Medication Cart)Findings include: On 02/09/2026 at 10:57 A.M., the 100 Hall Medication Cart was observed with RN 4 and contained the following:- A small round white pill was lying loose in the bottom of the second drawer along with dust and paper debris and- A half of a small oval green pill was lying loose in the bottom of the third drawer along with dust and paper debris.During an interview, on 02/09/2026 at 10:58 A.M., RN 4 indicated she didn't know what the pills were or who they belonged to, pills should not be loose in the medication cart. The current facility policy, titled Medication Storage dated 11/01/2022, was provided by the Director of Nursing (DON) on 02/12/2026 at 11:50 A.M. The policy indicated, .Medications must be stored under proper conditions to protect against degradation .3.1-25(o)

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-02-12 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to transcribe a physician order on admission for 1 of 16 resident records reviewed. (Resident 20)Findings include:The clinical record for Resident 20 was reviewed on 02/09/2026 at 11:46 A.M. An admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 01/09/2026, indicated the resident was cognitively intact. The resident's diagnoses included, but were not limited to, hip and knee replacement, hypertension, osteoporosis, malnutrition.A hospital discharge record, dated 01/27/2026, indicated the resident was to receive Coumadin (a blood thinning medication) 3 milligrams (mg) on Sunday, Monday, Wednesday, and Friday. An physician's order, with a start date of 01/27/2026, indicated the resident was to receive Coumadin 3 mg once a day on Monday, Wednesday, and Friday. During an interview, on 02/10/2026 at 11:24 A.M., RN 2 indicated when a resident was admitted from the hospital she would get report from the hospital, put the resident in the facility computer system, assess the resident, get their vital signs, and transcribe the orders…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-01-23 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow the physician's orders related to the treatment for a pressure ulcer for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for pressure ulcer treatments. (Resident 47) Findings include: During an observation on 01/21/25 at 11:06 A.M., Resident 47's dressing change was observed. The resident's pressure wound, located on her right upper buttock, was observed with the Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) and the Minimum Data Set (MDS) Coordinator. The ADON and MDS Coordinator donned gowns and gloves prior to entering the resident's room. The ADON indicated the current treatment was to cleanse the wound with wound cleanser, apply collagen powder, then Anasept gel (an antimicrobial), and cover the wound with a border dressing. The staff members entered the room, raised the bed, pulled the covers back, pulled the resident's brief down, then rolled the resident to her left side. The resident's wound was uncovered and open to air. The ADON removed her gloves and washed her hands. The wound was quarter sized and had a dark red wound…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-01-23 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to ensure fall preventative devise interventions were in place as ordered for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for accident hazards. (Resident 27) Findings include: The clinical record for Resident 27 was reviewed on 01/21/25 at 9:23 A.M. A Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 11/13/24, indicated the resident was moderately cognitively impaired. The resident's diagnoses included, but were not limited to, dementia, hypertension, and malnutrition. A Fall Care Plan, with a start date of 07/12/24 and a revised date of 01/23/25, included but was not limited to, the following intervention: Highlighter tape to wheelchair brakes with a start date of 09/08/24. A Progress Note, dated 09/09/24 at 4:02 A.M., indicated the resident had a fall while trying to transfer herself into her wheelchair to go to the bathroom. The left side wheelchair brake was not locked upon inspection. The resident had no injuries. An Interdisciplinary Team (IDT) Note, dated 09/09/24 at 1:36 P.M., indicated the immediate intervention to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-01-23 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to have a medication error rate of less than 5% for 2 of 32 medication administrations observed. (Resident 3) Findings include: During an observation on 01/22/25 at 9:36 A.M., RN 6 prepared Resident's 3 morning medications. She placed all of Resident 3's morning prescribed (14) different medications in one medication cup. The resident's morning dose of Buprenorphine, 2 mg, was to be administered by sublingual (placing a drug under the tongue to dissolve and be absorbed directly into the bloodstream) administration. The RN retrieved the resident's prescribed eye drops, refresh tears and brimonidine, from the medication cart. The nurse took the prepared cup of medications, and the two types eye drops to the therapy gym where the resident requested to take the medications. The resident was given the cup of medications and took them whole with sips of her drink. The nurse then administered the eyes drops to the resident, one after the other, with no wait time in between. The resident's Buprenorphine was not…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-01-23 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow infection control guidelines related to urinary catheter care for 2 of 3 residents reviewed for infection control. (Residents 10 and 15) Findings include: 1. On 01/16/25 at 1:40 P.M., Resident 10 was observed in her room sitting in a recliner. The resident's urinary catheter drainage bag was hanging from a pocket on the recliner, with two inches of the bottom of the bag resting on the floor. On 01/16/25 at 3:29 P.M., the resident was observed in her room sitting in the recliner. The resident's catheter drainage bag was hanging from the chair with two inches of the bottom of the bag resting on the floor. On 01/17/25 at 1:43 P.M., the resident was observed in bed. The bed was in a low position and the catheter bag was hanging on the left side of the bed. An inch of the bag was resting on the floor. Qualified Medication Aide (QMA) 2 observed the bag and indicated it shouldn't be touching the floor; it was probably because the bed was so low. She indicated she would adjust the position of the bag. On…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-12-04 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to report the misappropriation of money for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for personal property. (Resident 16) Findings include: During an observation and interview on 11/27/23 at 1:54 P.M., Resident 16 was sitting in his room on his wheelchair. The resident indicated on Thanksgiving Eve (11/22/23) he had $1,024.00 missing from his fanny pack. He had gone to the bathroom, located in his room, to get cleaned up and placed the fanny pack in his recliner with a blanket over it. The next morning, he realized the money was missing. He reported it to a nurse, and she called the police. He had not talked to the Administrator as she had been off work. During an interview on 11/28/23 at 2:50 P.M., RN 4 indicated on the morning of 11/23/23, Resident 16 came to her saying he was missing $900.00. She had him recount his money just to make sure and she sent a message to the DON (Director of Nursing). She didn't hear anything back from the DON, so she called the police, and they came and talked to the resident. During an interview on 11/29/23 at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-04 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to label and store medications appropriately for 1 of 2 medications carts (200 Hall) and 1 of 1 medication rooms (Health Care Medication Room) observed. Findings include: 1. The 200 Hall Medication Cart was observed on 12/04/23 at 9:08 A.M., with RN 6 and contained the following: - a Lispro insulin pen for Resident 108, containing 100 units of insulin, with no open date, - an unopened Basalgar insulin pen for Resident 108 with a sticker that indicated to refrigerate until opened. The pen was in the same package as an opened Basalgar pen for the resident. The RN indicated the one pen was not opened and should have been in the refrigerator, - a Lantus insulin pen for Resident 40, containing about 30 units of insulin, with no open date, and - a Novolog insulin pen for Resident 37, containing 200 units of insulin, with no open date. RN 6 indicated the insulin pens were good for 28 days after they were opened and should have all been labeled with an open date. The current Humalog Insulin Lispro Instruction for Use was provided by…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to TRILOGY HEALTH SERVICES — 123 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 5 of 54.2+0.8 vs chain
Health inspection 4 of 53.5+0.5 vs chain
Staffing 4 of 53.3+0.7 vs chain
Quality measures 5 of 54.8+0.2 vs chain
The other 122 homes this chain runs (chain average 4.2★, per CMS)
1 of 5Heritage TheFindlay, OH 1 of 5The Oaks Rehabilitation and Healthcare CenterZanesville, OH 2 of 5Homewood Health CampusLebanon, IN 2 of 5Violet Springs Health CampusPickerington, OH 2 of 5Woodmont Health CampusBoonville, IN 3 of 5Cobblestone Crossings Health CampusTerre Haute, IN 3 of 5Creasy Springs Health CampusLafayette, IN 3 of 5Cumberland Pointe Health CampusWest Lafayette, IN 3 of 5Forest Park Health CampusRichmond, IN 3 of 5Franciscan Health Care CenterLouisville, KY 3 of 5Greenleaf Health CampusElkhart, IN 3 of 5River Terrace Health CampusMadison, IN 3 of 5Scenic Hills At The MonasteryFerdinand, IN 3 of 5Smiths Mill Health CampusNew Albany, OH 3 of 5Springhurst Health CampusGreenfield, IN 3 of 5Springs Of Richmond, TheRichmond, IN 3 of 5St Mary Healthcare CenterLafayette, IN 3 of 5Stonegate Health CampusLapeer, MI 3 of 5Sun Prairie Senior LivingSun Prairie, WI 3 of 5Taylor Springs Health CampusGahanna, OH 3 of 5The Willows at Fritz FarmLexington, KY 3 of 5The Willows at HamburgLexington, KY 3 of 5The Willows at HarrodsburgHarrodsburg, KY 3 of 5The Willows at SpringhurstLouisville, KY 3 of 5Villages At Oak Ridge, TheWashington, IN 3 of 5Waunakee Valley Senior LivingWaunakee, WI 3 of 5Wellbrooke Of CarmelCarmel, IN 4 of 5Arlington Place Health CampusIndianapolis, IN 4 of 5Ashford Place Health CampusShelbyville, IN 4 of 5Aspen Place Health CampusGreensburg, IN 4 of 5Avalon Springs Health CampusValparaiso, IN 4 of 5Bethany Pointe Health CampusAnderson, IN 4 of 5Blair Ridge Health CampusPeru, IN 4 of 5Bridgepointe Health CampusVincennes, IN 4 of 5Cedar Creek Health CampusLowell, IN 4 of 5Clearvista Lake Health CampusIndianapolis, IN 4 of 5Forest Springs Health CampusLouisville, KY 4 of 5Glen Oaks Health CampusNew Castle, IN 4 of 5Glen Ridge Health CampusLouisville, KY 4 of 5Meadows Of Delphos TheDelphos, OH

Showing 40 of 122; lowest-rated first.

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
JACKSON COUNTY SCHNECK MEMORIAL HOSPITALOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 11/01/2014
TRILOGY RER LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 08/01/2002
BEVERS, SUSANIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; TRUSTEE OF THE SNFsince 09/01/2020
FISH, ERICIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 09/01/2020
GILLILAND, TERRENCEIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; TRUSTEE OF THE SNFsince 07/01/2012
HARPE, BRANDONIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; TRUSTEE OF THE SNFsince 09/01/2020
KLEBER, COURTNEYIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; TRUSTEE OF THE SNFsince 09/01/2020
MANN, DEBORAHIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 02/10/2014
MARKEL, ANDREWIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; TRUSTEE OF THE SNFsince 09/01/2020
MCCORY, JACKIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; TRUSTEE OF THE SNFsince 07/01/2012
REEDY, MATTHEWIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; TRUSTEE OF THE SNFsince 07/01/2012
SMITH, RICKIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; TRUSTEE OF THE SNFsince 07/01/2012
STOREY, MARCIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; TRUSTEE OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2025
TRILOGY HEALTHCARE OF SEYMOUR, LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 10/07/2025
HILL, NEILIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 04/15/2025
SHORT, ANGELAIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 05/14/2017
BARNEY, LEIGHIndividualLIMITED PARTNERSHIP INTEREST; INDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNFsince 10/07/2025
DAVIS, DAVIDIndividualLIMITED PARTNERSHIP INTERESTsince 12/31/2019
AMERICAN HEALTHCARE REIT HOLDINGS LPOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 10/07/2025
AMERICAN HEALTHCARE REIT INCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 10/01/2018
CONTINENTAL MERGER SUB LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 10/01/2021
GAHC3 TRILOGY JV LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 12/01/2015
GAHC4 TRILOGY JV LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 10/01/2018
PARAGON OUTPATIENT REHABILITATION SERVICES LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 12/01/2015
SCHLETERS', LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 08/01/2002
TRILOGY HEALTHCARE HOLDINGS INCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 10/07/2025
TRILOGY INVESTORS LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 12/01/2015
TRILOGY MANAGEMENT SERVICES LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 12/01/2015
TRILOGY REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUSTOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 12/01/2015
TRILOGY REAL ESTATE OF SEYMOUR LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 10/07/2025
TRILOGY REIT HOLDINGS LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 12/01/2015

CMS files one row per role, so the 46 rows in the source record cover these 31 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

16 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$8.8M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
+8.9%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$1.2M
Related-party expense15% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 39%Medicare 10%Other / private 51%

This home reported $1.2M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 15% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$316per resident / day
operating cost
$9,610per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$347per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in IN

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Indiana Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Indiana
$8,943/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$10,326/mo
Nursing home (private)
$5,639/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 155712. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-02-12, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next