Wellbrooke Of Wabash

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

63.3% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 118 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 78.3% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 60 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.52 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 83% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 13% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 70 beds and averages 50.4 residents a day — about 72% occupied, or roughly 20 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.10 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.97 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.43 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.62 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.30 on weekdays — 16% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.09 to 0.69 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 32% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

15 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 5 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · D2026-06-04 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure an allegation of abuse was reported to the State Agency (Indiana Department of Health (IDOH)) for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for abuse. (Resident B)Findings include:Resident B's clinical record was reviewed on 6/3/26 at 9:14 a.m. Diagnoses included psychotic disorder with delusions due to known physiological condition and cognitive communication deficit. A 2/26/26, Significant Change, Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment indicated Resident B was severely cognitively impaired.An Interdisciplinary Team note, dated 5/8/26 at 4:48 p.m., indicated a nurse heard another resident's family member kiss Resident B. Upon immediate assessment, the resident was not in any distress and was smiling. No injuries were noted. The resident appeared to be in pleasant mood and could not recall the incident. At the time of the occurrence, the visitor walked out of the building. A head-to-toe skin assessment completed revealed no adverse skin issues. The resident's daughter was contacted regarding the potential occurrence with no further…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-06-04 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
  Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement interventions to protect a resident pending the investigation of an allegation of abuse according to facility policy for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for abuse. (Resident B)Findings include:Resident B's clinical record was reviewed on 6/3/26 at 9:14 a.m. Diagnoses included psychotic disorder with delusions due to known physiological condition and cognitive communication deficit.A 2/26/26, Significant Change, Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment indicated Resident B was severely cognitively impaired.During an interview, on 6/3/26 at 1:14 p.m., LPN 17 indicated, on 5/4/26, she heard a kissing sound, looked up, and saw a visitor walking away from Resident B. The visitor, who had a family member residing in the facility at that time, had previously sat with Resident B at lunch at times. LPN 17 assessed Resident B and notified the DON.During an interview, on 6/4/26 at 11:18 a.m., Activity Assistant 2 indicated Resident B's daughter came into the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2026-01-14 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to store and prepare food under safe and sanitary conditions related to kitchen equipment and storage. This deficient practice had the potential to affect 92 of 92 residents who received food from the facility kitchen. Findings include:During a kitchen observation on 1/8/26 at 9:58 a.m., accompanied by the Dietary Manager, the following was observed:Upon entering the kitchen, numerous food splatters ranged from brown, black and red in color were on the floor in front of the doorway.Brown and black grease buildup was noted to the left side of the stove on the side of the steamer. Numerous grease streaks down the side of the steamer were honey brown and black in color.There were black and brown splatter marks all along the floor between the stove and the steam warmer. A whole top piece of a bun was laying face up between the stove and steamer.The bottom of the left oven had burnt-on, thick, black buildup. The buildup was the thickness of a pencil eraser.The oven face had a thick black grease streak that was the length of a piece…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-01-14 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure medications were labeled with required information, including open dates, and failed to maintain medications in a secure and organized manner, as evidenced by loose medications found in a medication cart. This deficient practice had the potential to affect 51 of 51 residents. (Residents 9 and 42)Findings include: During an observation of the 200-hallway medication cart on [DATE] at 2:45 p.m., accompanied by QMA 3, a white round pill with the imprint TCL 340 and a yellow oblong pill with the imprint C55 were found loose in the second drawer from the top of the cart. QMA 3 indicated any loose medications found in the medication cart should be destroyed in the drug buster (a medication disposal system). Medication carts were cleaned out on an as needed basis. The 200-hallway medication cart stored medications for 39 of 51 residents.During an observation of the 100-hallway medication cart on [DATE] at 2:57 p.m., accompanied by RN 4,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-14 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview, observation, and record review, the facility failed to ensure infection prevention and control strategies for transmission-based precautions were followed for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for contact isolation precautions. (Resident 1) Findings include:During an interview, on 1/8/26 at 11:26 a.m., Resident 1 indicated she was unable to recall what type of infection she had. An enhanced barrier precaution (EBP) sign was located under the nameplate of Resident 1's room. A personal protective equipment (PPE) cart was in her room beside the door. During an observation, on 1/8/26 at 3:03 p.m., the EBP sign was no longer present. A contact precautions sign hung above Resident 1's nameplate.During an observation, on 1/12/26 at 2:44 p.m., a large, empty, cardboard biohazard box sat beside the PPE cart in Resident 1's room. During an interview, on 1/12/26 at 3:01 p.m. LPN 6 indicated Resident 1 had been on contact isolation for COVID-19. An EBP sign had been placed in error after the resident was out of COVID-19 precautions. Resident 1 had a qualifying condition that fell…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-12-06 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain a resident's dignity and provide privacy during a random observation of personal care. (Resident 46) Findings include: Resident 46's clinical record was reviewed on 12/3/24 at 9:50 a.m. Current diagnoses included morbid (severe) obesity, multiple sclerosis, depression, anxiety, chronic pain syndrome, overactive bladder, constipation, muscle weakness, paresthesia of skin, and need for assistance with personal care. An admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], indicated the resident was frequently incontinent of both bowel and bladder. The resident was cognitively intact and required total assistance for personal hygiene, including pericare. A current care plan, initiated 9/20/24, indicated the resident had impairment in functional status and required assistance with all activities of daily living (ADLs). During a personal care observation on 12/4/24 at 11:45 a.m., CNA 11 and CNA 12 were performing pericare for Resident 46 in…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-12-06 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
  Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident with a change in condition was assessed prior to hospitalization for 1 of 1 residents reviewed for hospitalization (Resident 51). Findings include: During an interview, on 12/2/24 at 10:04 a.m., Resident 51 sat in her recliner with her feet elevated. The resident indicated she had been hospitalized shortly after she had been admitted because she had become incoherent. Her blood sugar had been very low. Resident 51's clinical record was reviewed on 12/3/24 at 11:05 a.m. Diagnoses included displaced intertrochanteric fracture of left femur, subsequent encounter for close fracture with routine healing (9/23/24), type 2 diabetes mellitus with diabetic chronic kidney disease (9/23/24), and anxiety disorder, unspecified (9/23/24). Physician orders included glimepiride (for high blood sugar) 2 milligrams (mg) daily (started 9/23/24 and discontinued 9/30/24), metformin (for high blood sugar) 500 mg twice a day (started 9/23/24 and discontinued 9/30/24), and pioglitazone (for high blood sugar) 15 mg daily (started…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-12-06 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  2. During an observation, on 12/2/24 at 10:10 a.m., Resident 37 was wearing support hose on her bilateral lower legs. Resident 37's clinical record was reviewed on 12/03/24 at 10:30 a.m. Diagnoses included hypertension, heart failure, shortness of breath, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and sepsis. Resident 37 had a past physician order for support hose to be applied in the morning and removed at bedtime, initiated 10/4/22 and discontinued on 7/23/24. A nursing progress note, dated 9/18/24 at 10:54 p.m., indicated the resident stated this morning when staff applied the support hose, her right lower leg was scratched, and a small scab was intact without drainage or edema. During an observation, on 12/3/24 at 11:18 a.m., Resident 37 walked out of her room wearing support hose on her bilateral lower legs. Resident 37 indicated the staff put support hose on her legs every morning. During an interview, on 12/3/24 at 11:19 p.m., LPN 6 indicated the resident was wearing her support hose, but she was unsure why she didn't have an order for them. During an interview, on 12/3/24 at…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-12-06 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
  Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident with recurrent urinary tract infections received sufficient fluids for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for hydration. Findings include: During an observation, on 12/4/24 at 9:29 a.m., Resident 29 was not in her room. Her full water jug was on the table next to her bed, did not contain any ice, and was warm to the touch. Resident 29's clinical record was reviewed on 12/4/24 at 9:46 a.m. Diagnoses included anxiety disorder, paranoid personality disorder, hypertensive heart disease without heart failure, cognitive communication deficit, and urinary tract infection. A physician's order, dated 1/21/24 at 1:14 a.m., indicated regardless of urinalysis results, fluids were to be pushed. A current care plan, dated 3/1/22 and last reviewed on 12/4/24, indicated the resident had a history of urinary tract infections. Interventions included to encourage the resident to drink fluids. A current care plan, dated 8/10/21 and last reviewed on 10/25/24, indicated the resident had impairment in functional status in…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-12-06 · tag F0744 — failed to care for residents with dementia — isolated
  Provide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with dementia.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident with dementia did not receive anti-psychotic medications without indication for 1 of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications (Resident 5) Findings include: On 12/2/24 at 10:30 a.m., Resident 5 was sitting in her wheelchair near the main lounge on 200 hall. On 12/3/24 at 10:36 a.m., the resident was propelling herself around in her wheelchair. On 12/5/24 at 11:04 a.m., the resident was propelling herself in her wheelchair, smiling and talking to a resident near her. Resident 5's clinical record was reviewed on 12/3/24 at 10:57 a.m. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, Parkinson's disease without dyskinesia, psychotic disorder with delusions due to known physiological condition, dementia in other diseases classified elsewhere, unspecified severity, with other behavioral disturbance, anxiety disorder due to known physiological condition, and insomnia due to other mental disorder. She had current physician orders for sertraline (anti-depressant) 50 mg (milligram) daily,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to TRILOGY HEALTH SERVICES — 123 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 30 rows in the source record cover these 28 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

15 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $1.4M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 13% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in IN