Renaissance Manor On Cabot

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

57.1% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 70 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 76.7% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 60 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.61 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 89% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 39% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 61 beds and averages 27.7 residents a day — about 45% occupied, or roughly 33 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.76 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 1.25 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.92 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.21 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.98 on weekdays — 19% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.38 to 0.93 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 34% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

22 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 12 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · D2025-09-22 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
  Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, records reviewed, and interviews, the facility failed to provide treatment and care for an indwelling urinary catheter in accordance with the Physician's orders for one Resident (#6), of 2 applicable residents, out of a total sample of 12 residents, which resulted in a delay in care and increased the Resident's risk for indwelling urinary catheter associated complications. Specifically, the facility failed to: -change Resident #6's indwelling urinary catheter in a timely manner, per the Physician's order, when the Resident's indwelling urinary catheter was leaking urine and the Resident was dependent on staff for urinary catheter care, placing the Resident at risk for alteration in skin condition. -change Resident #6's indwelling urinary catheter using the Physician ordered balloon size, which resulted in the Resident experiencing short-term pain and increased the Resident's risk for catheter associated trauma. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Catheter - Indwelling Urinary - Care of, dated 6/1/96 and revised 2/1/23, indicated the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-09-22 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — isolated
  Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on records reviewed, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure licensed nursing staff (Nurse #2) was assessed for and demonstrated competency and skill sets to provide indwelling urinary catheter care for one Resident (#6) out of a total sample of 12 residents, resulting in the Resident experiencing a delay in care.Specifically, the facility failed to ensure Nurse #2's skills relative to indwelling urinary catheter care had been assessed for competency when: -The facility identified its ability to care for residents with indwelling urinary catheters in the Facility Assessment. -Nurse #2 was assigned to care for Resident #6, who had an indwelling urinary catheter. -Resident #6: >Experienced urinary leakage from his/her indwelling urinary catheter. >Required the urinary catheter to be replaced. -Nurse #2, who had not been assessed for and demonstrated competency for urinary catheter care, did not intervene timely with Physician ordered interventions when the Resident experienced leakage from his/her indwelling urinary catheter. Findings include: Review of the facility's…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-10-31 · tag F0557 — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to be treated with respect and dignity and to retain and use personal possessions.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on records reviewed and interviews, for one of three sampled residents (Resident #1) who requested staff assistance with toileting care needs, the Facility failed to ensure he/she was treated in a dignified and respectful manner, when on 10/05/24, Resident #1 used the call light to request assistance to walk to the bathroom, and a Certified Nurse Aide (later identified as CNA #1) refused his/her request and told him/her that he/she could use the bed pan or urinate in his/her bed. Resident #1 said he/she was in a position where he/she had to rely on other people to help him/her, and that CNA #1's response made him/her feel humiliated. Findings include: Review of the Facility Policy titled Resident Rights Under Federal Law, dated as revised 02/01/23, indicated residents have the fundamental right to considerate care that safeguards their personal dignity along with respecting cultural, social and spiritual values. The Policy indicated its purpose was to treat each resident with respect and dignity and care for each resident in a manner and in an environment that promotes…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2024-10-07 · tag F0730 — widespread
  Observe each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review, and interview, the facility failed to complete a performance review at least once every 12 months for four Certified Nurses Aides [CNA's] (#1, #2, #4 and #5) out of four employee records reviewed. Specifically, the facility failed to complete annual performance evaluations for Certified Nurses Aides (CNA's) #1, #2, #4 and #5 as required placing the facility residents at risk for unevaluated delivery of care. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Performance Appraisal, dated 12/1/07 with revision date of 7/1/22, indicated: -Managers will meet with their employees at least annually to conduct performance reviews or have performance-based conversation. -This policy applies to all employees. Review of the facility employee records indicated that CNA #1 was hired on 7/9/21, CNA #2 was hired on 7/6/90, CNA #4 was hired on 5/9/23 and CNA #5 was hired on 4/30/21 without indication of performance evaluations in the record for the past 12 months. During an interview on 10/07/24 at 5:40 P.M., Nurse Consultant #1 said the DON was currently on leave of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2024-10-07 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — widespread
  Implement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that an Antibiotic Stewardship Program (ASP-a coordinated effort to improve how antibiotics are prescribed and used in a Heathcare setting) was in place for antibiotic use protocols and monitoring. Specifically, the facility failed to conduct antibiotic monitoring for the facility, placing residents at risk for complications related to antibiotic usage. Findings include: Review of facility policy titled Antibiotic Stewardship, dated 12/31/16 with revision date of 10/24/22 and review date on 11/15/22, indicated: -Centers (the facility) will implement an Antibiotic Stewardship Program (ASP) that includes antibiotic use protocols and systems for monitoring antibiotic use. -Core elements of the ASP include leadership, accountability, drug expertise, action, tracking, reporting, and education. -The Infection Preventionist (IP) is responsible to monitor and support the ASP through rounds, review of Provider orders, medical record documentation, and available reports. The Infection Preventionist tracks antibiotic starts…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-10-07 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — pattern
  Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview, record and policy review, the facility failed to follow professional standards of practice relative to the transcription of Physician orders for one Resident (#15), of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications, out of a total sample of 12 residents. Specifically, the facility failed to that ensure laboratory orders and Psychiatric Consult recommendation obtained by the Physician after a Medication Regimen Review (MRR) conducted by the Consultant Pharmacist were completed for Resident #15. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Transcription of Orders, revised 5/1/23, included the following: -orders from an authorized Licensed Independent Practitioner (Physician, Nurse Practitioner or Physician Assistant) are accepted by a Registered Nurse (RN) or Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) . -transcribing is the recording of the orders by the RN or LPN . Review of the facility policy titled Medication Monitoring: Medication Regimen Review (MRR) and Reporting, dated January 2024, indicated the MRR was a thorough evaluation of the medication regimen of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-10-07 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — pattern
  Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure sufficient nursing staffing levels with the appropriate competencies and experience to provide nursing and related services to the facility residents. Specifically, the facility failed to: 1. provide staffing levels in accordance with the facility assessment for 23 out of 36 days for the period 9/1/24 -10/6/24, placing the facility residents at risk for impeded delivery of care and inability to meet the specific needs and concerns of each resident. 2. provide a sufficient number of nursing staff to provide basic care and respond timely per Resident Council concerns voiced. 3. provide sufficient staffing to assist timely with ADL care for: -Resident's #8, #84, and #5 -Resident Representative (requesting anonymous consideration) advocating for family. -Direct care staff concerns. Findings include: 1. Review of the Facility Assessment indicated the following staffing needs were identified as necessary per the staffing sufficiency analysis dated, 10/8/23 through 10/7/24 on page 22: -One Director of Nursing…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-10-07 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — pattern
  Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview, record and policy review, the facility failed to ensure that one Resident (#8), of five applicable residents reviewed for unnecessary medications, out of a total sample of 12 residents, did not recieve medications outside of the Physician ordered parameters. Specifically, for Resident #8, the facility failed to ensure that Tramadol (an opioid medication used to relieve moderate to moderately severe pain) was administered within the parameters (moderate and severe pain) prescribed by the Physician. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Pain Management, revised 11/1/23, indicated staff will continuously observe and monitor patients for comfort and presence of pain and will implement strategies in accordance with professional standards of practice, the patient-centered plan of care, and the patient's choices related to pain management. The policy also included the following: -when opioids are used, the lowest possible effective dosage should be prescribed for the shortest amount of time possible after considering all medication needs -an…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-10-07 · tag F0582 — isolated
  Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage (NOMNC: notice issued to a resident who is receiving benefits under Medicare Part A when all covered services end) and/or Skilled Nursing Facility Advanced Beneficiary Notice of Non-coverage (SNF ABN: notice issued to a resident when a facility determines the beneficiary no longer qualifies for Medicare Part A skilled services and the resident has not used all his/her Medicare benefit days) were issued for three Residents (#81, #82 and #27), out of four residents reviewed. Specifically, the facility failed to issue the: 1. NOMNC notice two calendar days prior to Resident #81's termination of Medicare benefits, as required. 2. SNF ABN notice to Resident #82 so the Resident/Resident Representative could decide if they wished to continue receiving skilled services that may not be paid for by Medicare, and were aware of the financial responsibility they may have to assume. 3. NOMNC notice to Resident #27 prior to his/her Medicare benefits ending, as required. Findings include: 1.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-07 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that a plan of care was developed for monitoring of psychotropic (medication that affects how the brain works and causes changes in mood, awareness, thoughts, feelings or behavior) medications for side effects and response for one Resident (#7), out of five applicable residents reviewed for unnecessary medication review, out of a total sample of 12 residents. Specifically, for Resident #7, the facility failed to develop a plan of care relative to the Resident's use of the antidepressant medications, including monitoring for potential medication side effects and response. Findings include: Resident #7 was admitted to the facility in March 2024 with diagnoses of Altered Mental Status (AMS - a general term for a change in mental function that can affect a person's awareness, movement, and behavior) and Dementia (a group of conditions characterized by impairment of at least two brain functions, such as memory and loss of judgment). Review of the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to GENESIS HEALTHCARE — 184 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 14 rows in the source record cover these 13 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

9 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $898K paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 19% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in MA