No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Autumn Lake Healthcare At Parkville

8710 Emge Road, Baltimore, MD 21234 · For profit - Corporation · 135 certified beds · (410) 661-5955 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (410) 661-5955 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse/neglect citation on record (F0600) — cited Nov 20221 immediate-jeopardy citation CMS recorded as corrected before the inspection ended (past non-compliance)
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • a strong health-inspection score (4/5) — the hardest rating to game (though it’s ranked within its own state, not nationally)
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Nov 2022
  • it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • inspectors recorded 1 serious finding as past non-compliance — the problem was found, fixed, and verified before the survey closed, so it is history rather than a current condition, but it is still worth asking what changed
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (37) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)
  • about 20% of its spending goes to commonly-owned related companies

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

4/5
CMS overall
4 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 4 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 2 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 4 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★★★ 5/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
8508 Loch Raven Blvd Ste 1A · (410) 828-9200 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
1608 E Joppa Rd · (301) 907-0700 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
8642 Loch Raven Blvd · (443) 805-8314 · Call to confirm hours
Park
1202 Cromwell Bridge Rd · (410) 321-1894 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 4 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 4 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 4 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 2 to 4 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating4★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased27.4%20.4%15.4%worse
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight6.0%5.4%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.2%0.5%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.8%1.5%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms33.2%22.8%6.5%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.0%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury1.0%2.4%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened28.7%22.2%16.1%worse
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication31.3%16.7%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine99.1%96.6%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers2.0%5.9%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control27.8%25.0%21.2%worse
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table29.9%13.8%17.1%worse
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication1.4%1.1%1.4%typical
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine78.5%80.6%79.4%typical
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission23.1%21.0%22.6%typical
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit9.3%9.8%12.0%better
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days0.721.331.67better
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days0.701.201.80better

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

44.5% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 179 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

44.5%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
13.6%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
69.6%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.34U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.13hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.17hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.05hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 69.6% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 69 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.34 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 58% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 5% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF44.5%CMS range 35.2–52.951.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF13.6%CMS range 10.6–17.610.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge69.6%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge52.2%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge63.8%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified98.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting100.0%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.7%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened1.3%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization7.2%CMS range 4.8–9.67.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.431.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.50
RN hours/ resident / day
0.87
LPN hours/ resident / day
1.88
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.25
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.38
RN hoursweekends
51.5%
Total nursing turnover
37.5%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 135 beds and averages 123.5 residents a day — about 91% occupied, or roughly 12 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.25 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.50 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.88 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.97 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.37 on weekdays — 12% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.54 to 0.38 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 52% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

9
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-07-25)
12
at the previous standard inspection (2022-11-17)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

37 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 26 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Immediate jeopardy · J2022-11-17 · tag F0678 — failed to provide CPR when needed — isolated
    Provide basic life support, including CPR, prior to the arrival of emergency medical personnel , subject to physician orders and the resident’s advance directives.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, staff interview it was determined that the facility nursing staff failed to initiate Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (CPR) on a resident without a pulse (#167). This was evident for 1 out 55 residents that were in the survey sample. After the incident the facility developed, initiated, and completed a plan of correction to prevent further incidents of CPR not being initiated. Therefore, this deficiency will be cited as past non-compliance immediate jeopardy. The date of correction was [DATE]. The findings are: Review of intake MD00175813 on [DATE], [DATE] and [DATE] revealed the following: Resident #167 completed a Maryland Medical Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment (MOLST) on [DATE] and the resident requested to receive Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (CPR). Cardiopulmonary resuscitation is an emergency procedure that includes chest compressions and sometimes includes artificial ventilation in an effort to preserve intact brain function until further measures are taken to restore…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-07-25 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and staff interviews it was determined that the facility failed to maintain infection control practices in the laundry room. This was evident during the recertification/complaint survey.The findings include:On 7/24/25 at 9:30 AM an inspection of the laundry room was conducted by the surveyor to ensure compliance with infection control. In a pile on the folding table were resident clean linen in various stages of folding and packaging. Also noted on top of the folding table were:2 cups of ice water in 12 oz plastic water cups1 super Sani Disinfectant wipe #21 Super Sani Disinfectant wipe #41 8 oz bye-bye odor spray1 8oz Aloe soft lotion (Geri-Geri)I pkt of wash clothIn an interview with Staff #19 a laundry assistant on 7/24/25 at 9:50 AM , she was asked to explain the laundry process from collection to delivery to residents, She stated that she picks up laundry in the morning from the nursing units, sorts the dirty laundry with PPE in the dirty area, and loads them in the wash. Once the wash is done, she brings them to the clean side where they are dried and then…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-25 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a resident's room was clean, comfortable and homelike. This was evident for 1 of 2 nursing units reviewed during the recertification/complaint survey.The findings include: On 7/16/25 at 9:20 AM during the initial tour of the building, the surveyor walked into Resident #106's room and perceived an overwhelming strong smell of urine. The pungent smell seemed to be coming from all over the room including the bathroom. Inside the room, at the bedside was a commode less than one quarter full of urine, it was uncovered. Also observed was a vent by the bedroom window, it had a brown rusty color all over it. The resident was lying in bed watching TV, their clothing and bedding did not look or feel wet. The surveyor tried talking to the resident, but their speech was impaired, and the resident was difficult to understand. The surveyor asked for the nurse to come to the resident's room. Staff # 7, a licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) came in and was asked about the strong urine odor, he said he…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-25 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review and interview it was determined that the facility failed to develop and implement a person-centered comprehensive care plan as required. This was evident for 1 (Resident #82) of 33 care plans reviewed during the survey process.The findings include: Hemiplegia refers to paralysis on one side of the body, meaning a complete inability to move the affected limbs.Hemiparesis: refers to weakness on one side of the body, which may involve difficulty with movement or a reduced range of motion The Minimum Data Set (MDS) is a standardized comprehensive assessment tool that measures health status in nursing home residents.On 07/16/2025 at 9:35 AM, in an interview with Resident #82, the resident stated that he/she had a decline in function since admission, he/she was able to get to and from the wheelchair by themselves and now they need help with transfers. On 07/23/2025 at 9:10 AM, a review of the resident medical history revealed that the resident had a history of hemiplegia and hemiparesis. A June 10, 2025 MDS assessment showed that Resident #82 was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-07-25 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, medical record review, and staff interview, it was determined the facility staff failed to review and revise the interdisciplinary care plans to reflect accurate and current interventions for residents. This was evident for 1 (Resident #126) of 50 residents reviewed during a recertification/complaint survey.The findings include:A care plan is a guide that addresses the unique needs of each resident. It is used to plan, assess, and evaluate the effectiveness of the resident's care. The care plan is to be reviewed and revised at each assessment time of the resident to ensure the interventions on the care plan are accurate and appropriate for the resident.On 7/16/2025 at 2:15 PM, during initial pool screening, surveyor observed Resident #126 in bed awake and alert but non-verbal. The resident's roommate confirmed that the resident did not talk. However, surveyor did not observe any communication systems (board, cards, note pad, tablet, etc.) at the resident's bedside.On 7/16/2025 at 2:20 PM in an interview with the resident's nurse, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-25 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, medical record review, and interviews, it was determined the facility staff failed to provide treatment and care in accordance with professional standards. This was evident for 3 (Resident #45, #74, #5) of 50 residents reviewed during a recertification/complaint survey.The findings include: A piston syringe, often referred to as a syringe, is a medical device and tool used across various fields for both injecting and withdrawing fluids. It is also used for irrigating feeding tubes and adding liquid medication to existing gastrostomy tubes. 1) On 7/16/2025 at 8:00 AM Surveyor observed Resident #45 in bed awake, alert, and oriented to person, place, and situation. Surveyor observed the resident was connected to a tube feeding pump that was turned off. The tube feed bottle (Glucerna 1.5cal) was dated 7/15/2025, shift noted as 12N and rate 70. The bottle was almost empty. There was also a water flush bag that was not dated connected to the pump. Hanging on the pole beside the water flush bag was a piston syringe dated 7/14/2025. Surveyor asked Resident #45 when the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-07-25 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to accurately complete a resident's skin assessment sheet and failed to follow a physician's order for wound treatment. This was evident for 1(Resident #142) of 1 resident reviewed for pressure ulcers during the recertification/complaint survey.The findings include: On 7/22/25 at 9:00 AM a review of a complaint intake #310260, had that Resident #142 had bedsores, but the family member was not sure if they were facility acquired or not and if they were the cause of the resident's death.A review of the resident's medical records on 7/22/25 at 9:12AM revealed that Resident #142 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had many comorbidities, was cognitively impaired and immunocompromised. On admission the skin assessment sheet documented 3 pressure ulcer (PU) areas to the Right gluteal fold 6.5cm x 4.5 cm, R thigh(rear) 6x5cm X 6cm and Coccyx 4.5cm x 4.0cmx 1.0cm, meaning that resident came in to the facility with multiple…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-07-25 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, medical record review, and interview, it was determined the facility staff failed to label the oxygen tubing when oxygen therapy was initiated. This was evident for 1 (#57) of 50 residents reviewed during a recertification/complaint survey.The findings include:Oxygen (O2) therapy is a treatment that provides you with extra oxygen to breathe in. It is also called supplemental oxygen. It is only available through a prescription from your health care provider.On 7/15/2025 at 9:55 AM during initial pool screening, the surveyor observed Resident #57 in bed. The resident was wearing a nasal cannula (a device that delivers extra oxygen through a tube and into your nose) that was connected to an oxygen concentrator set at 2LPM (liters per minute). The LPM oxygen flow rate of 2 indicates that 2 liters of oxygen should flow into the resident's nose in 1 minute. There was no date/time and/or staff initials noted on the oxygen tubing. On 7/15/2025 at 10:20 AM, Registered Nurse (RN #18) verified and confirmed that Resident #57's oxygen tubing was not labelled with the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-25 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to develop and implement a person-centered comprehensive care plan as required. This was evident for 1 (Resident #84) of 33 care plans reviewed during the recertification/complaint survey process.Findings Included:A care plan is a tool used to summarize the resident's healthcare needs, treatments, and care goals. This tool is to be developed within 7 days after completion of the comprehensive assessment and prepared by an interdisciplinary team.On 07/15/2025 at 1:05 PM, in an interview with Resident #84 during the initial screening phase, the resident complaint of severe back pain 9/10, and staff was made aware of the complaint.On 07/16/2025 at 11:44 AM, Resident#84 was resting in bed and reported 8/10 back pain. The resident stated that pain medication was administered that morning, including a pain patch but he/she was still in pain. LPN #7 and Unit manager #5 were notified of the resident's pain. On 07/17/2025 at 3:35 PM, a record review of the Medication Administration Record (MAR) revealed that…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-07-25 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, it was determined that the facility failed to adequately monitor resident's blood pressure and heart rate prior to administering the medication. This is evident for 1(Resident #51) of 5 resident reviewed for unnecessary medications during the survey process. The findings include:On 07/24/2025 at 12:17 pm, a review of Resident #51's medical records revealed that the resident had an order for Lisinopril oral tablet 40 mg, give 1 tablet by mouth one time a day for hypertension hold for systolic blood pressure less than 110 or heart rate less than 60. A review of Resident #51 vital signs records revealed that the facility obtained vital signs twice in the month of July (July11, 2025 at 3:31 AM and July 17, 2025, at 4:25 AM). However, a review of the Medication Administration Records (MAR) revealed that the medication was administered daily (at approximately 10 am) in the Month of July; however, there was no documentation to suggest that the facility monitored blood pressure and/or heart rate prior to administering the medication.On 7/24/2025 at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-14 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review and review of pertinent documents and interviews it was determined the facility staff failed to notify the resident's representative when there was a significant change in the resident's condition and a change in the resident's treatment plan. This was evident for 1 (Resident #11) of 22 residents reviewed for a complaint during the complaint survey. The findings include: On 4/10/25 at 10:19 AM a review of complaint #MD00203408 alleged that Resident #11's representative was not notified when the resident had a change in condition and was started on oxygen. The complaint alleged the resident representative found out Resident #11 was on oxygen when s/he saw the resident using oxygen during a visit on 1/29/24, and the resident's body appeared swollen and full of fluid. When Resident #11 was asked why s/he hadn't called the representative, the resident said it was because s/he was scared & exhausted from the experience. Resident #11's representative spoke with the nurse on duty, who stated s/he was new to the facility, then reviewed the resident's chart and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 26 citations
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-14 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review and interview with staff it was determined that the facility failed to develop a person-centered Hospice plan of care with individualized needs and preferences. This was evident for 1 (Resident #12) of 1 residents reviewed for Hospice services during the complaint survey. The findings include: Hospice is a program that gives special care to people who are near the end of life and have stopped treatment to cure or control their disease. Hospice offers physical, emotional, social, and spiritual support for patients and their families. A care plan is a guide that addresses the unique needs of each resident. It is used to plan, assess and evaluate the effectiveness of the resident's care. Resident #12's medical record was reviewed on 4//8/25 at 1:52 PM. Resident #12 was admitted to Hospice Services on 7/11/23. A Hospice Plan of Care was developed by the facility on 7/10/23 with the focus: The resident has a terminal prognosis r/t (relate to) Resident is on [company name] Hospice services. The resident's goals were identified as: Resident #12's comfort…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-14 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, interviews, and review of pertinent documentation, it was determined the facility failed to keep residents free from a significant medication error by failing to ensure medication was available in a timely manner for the facility to administer. This was evident for 1 (Resident #16) of 22 residents reviewed for a complaint during the complaint survey. The findings include: On 4/11/25 at 9:00 AM, a review of complaint #MD00195309 alleged Resident #16 was told that his/her medications would be at the facility when s/he arrived at the facility, however it took 2 days to get the medication and the complaint alleged that the nurse attempted to give Resident #16 another resident's insulin. Following the review of the complaint, a review of Resident #16's electronic medical record (EMR) revealed documentation that Resident #16 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], at 7:30 PM, following an acute hospitalization and discharged from the facility in the beginning of September 2023. The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-14 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and interview with staff it was determined facility staff failed to maintain complete and accurately documented medical records. This was evident for 1 (Resident #12) of 1 residents reviewed for Hospice services during the complaint survey. The findings include: Resident #12's medical record and facility's Hospice contract were reviewed on 4//8/25 at 1:52 PM. The record revealed that Resident #12 was admitted to Hospice services on [DATE]. The facility's contract with Resident #12's Hospice provider included: 2.Responsibilities of Facility (d) coordination of care, (iv) Notification of Change in Condition. Facility shall immediately inform Hospice of any change in the condition of a Hospice Patient. It included but was not limited to the death of a Hospice Patient. A Nursing Progress Note dated [DATE] at 20:04 [8:04 PM] indicated Low blood pressure. Action: Monitoring resident blood pressure, Response: Resident is hospice and declining. There was no documentation indicating the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-11-17 · tag F0572 — pattern
    Give residents a notice of rights, rules, services and charges.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview from residents, record review and interview with facility staff, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents were aware of the current facilities rules and regulations after a change in ownership. This was evident during the resident council meeting and has the potential it effects all residents. The findings include: During the resident council meeting held on 11/3/2022 at 10:30 AM as part of the survey process, surveyor questioned the residents in attendance if they were aware of the facility rules and regulations and their rights under the new ownership that took place May 0f 2021. Five of the five residents in attendance were all residents in the facility prior to the transition of the facility from one company to another. The residents jointly agreed and spoke out that they were not informed or aware of any rule changes, nor were they asked to sign anything acknowledging new ownership of the facility and the expectations of the new owners. The facility Administrator and the Director of Nursing (DON) were interviewed on 11/4/2022 at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-11-17 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of resident council meeting minutes and interview with residents and facility staff, it was determined that the facility failed to give adequate responses to grievances presented by the resident council. This was found evident in the review of the monthly resident council meeting minutes and facility responses for the months of February through October 2022. The findings include: Review of the resident council meeting minutes on 11/1/2022 at 9:56 AM revealed repeat concerns 5 of 7 months, regarding failure of staff or significant delay of staff to answer call bells timely and concern regarding the presence of staff specifically geriatric nursing assistance (GNA) to provide care as needed. These concerns were also reported to the surveyors through interviews during the annual survey during initial screening. In the April Resident Council meeting agenda under 'old business' regarding concerns from March documented that residents were informed of recent increased in nursing staff members joining the team. April 2022 concerns also noted continued concerns regarding…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-11-17 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — pattern
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review and staff interview it was determined that the facility staff failed to administer medications according to the physician orders. This was evident for 3 out 6 residents in the survey sample. Documentation is an integral part of medication administration. Documentation communicates the timing, dosing, and effect of any medications received by a patient. In the setting of skilled nursing care, residents are often prescribed multiple medications for significant medical conditions. They are also often more vulnerable to medication error and more prone to changes in condition that require review and adjustment of their medication regimen. Inaccurate medication documentation has the potential to place residents at significant risk of medication error, provide incomplete or inaccurate information for providers and care givers to evaluate, and represents a failure of basic medication administration principles. Late documentation is a form of inaccurate documentation and is worsened if the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-11-17 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on surveyor observation and interview with staff it was determined that the facility fail to maintain a homelike environment this was evident in four out of four rooms observed. The findings include: On 11/03/22 at 1:33 PM the surveyor entered and began the initial tour of the facility. Observation and Brief walk of second floor hallway with the Maintenance Manager, no issued with lighting, adequate lighting and Comfortable lighting observed. Starting from room [ROOM NUMBER] of second floor hallway observed two 4x4 inch holes on baseboard of room [ROOM NUMBER] and room [ROOM NUMBER] respectively. A distinct smell of urine was observed by surveyor and was persistent throughout this portion of the hallway of the facility on 2nd floor. A 3x3 inches hole was also observed on room [ROOM NUMBER] baseboards. A missing tiles was also observed on room [ROOM NUMBER] by the window ac/heat vent. The baseboards was also observed coming off from the wall, leaky and wet with water inside the Nourishment room located in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-11-17 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review, interview, and review of pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to prevent abuse occurring from employees towards residents. This was evident during the review of facility reported incidents occurring between employees and residents, effecting 2 residents (#78 and #79) of 4 reviewed. The findings include: 1. During the initial tour Surveyor interviewed Resident #78 on 10/31/2022 at 9:44 AM regarding any concerns related to abuse. S/he stated that there was an incident with him/her and with his/her roommate #79. S/he elaborated on Resident #79. Resident #78 stated that Resident #79 according to his/her observations is unable to do anything for his/herself including communicate. S/he further stated that there was an incident when staff was providing care to Resident #78 and #79. Resident #78 asked staff to keep the curtain open so that s/he could see the care that was being provided to Resident #79. According to Resident #78, s/he observed GNA #21 slap Resident #79 on the arm while providing care. According to the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-11-17 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, review of facility documents and interviews, it was determined the facility staff failed to report an incident of alleged abuse to the Office of Health Care Quality (OHCQ) and local law enforcement in a timely manner (Resident #68). This was evident for 1 out of 18 residents reviewed for abuse allegations during an annual survey. The findings include: Review of Resident #68's medical record on 11/1/22 revealed the Resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis to include Schizophrenia. Schizophrenia is a serious mental disorder in which people interpret reality abnormally. Schizophrenia may result in some combination of hallucinations, delusions, and extremely disordered thinking and behavior that impairs daily functioning, and can be disabling. Review of a facility investigation regarding Resident #68 revealed Resident #68 reported on 10/22/22 to LPN (licensed practical nurse) #1 that GNA (geriatric nursing assistant) #1 was rough during care. Review of Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-11-17 · tag F0636 — isolated
    Assess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review and interview with facility staff, it was determined that the facility MDS coordinator failed to complete an assessment within the MDS. This was evident during the review of 1 of 3 hospice residents. The MDS is a federally mandated assessment tool used by nursing home staff to gather information on each resident's strengths and needs. Information collected drives resident care planning decisions. MDS assessments need to be accurate to ensure each resident receives the care they need. The findings include: During the review of Resident #59 on 11/4/2022 at 10:49 AM surveyor noted that the MDS coordinator assessing resident #59 for the 7/6/2022 annual assessment, section 'J' under health conditions, also addresses pain. This area identified that resident #59 has pain, takes as needed pain medications and should be assessed for pain. However, further review failed to reveal that the assessment was completed. Interview was held with MDS coordinator, staff #19 on 11/7/2022 at 11:01 AM regarding the surveyors' findings. She acknowledged the absence of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-11-17 · tag F0637 — isolated
    Assess the resident when there is a significant change in condition
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review and interview with facility staff, it was determined that the facility minimum data set (MDS) coordinator failed to submit a significant change assessment within the MDS timely. This was evident during the review of 1 of 3 hospice residents. The MDS is a federally mandated assessment tool used by nursing home staff to gather information on each resident's strengths and needs. Information collected drives resident care planning decisions. MDS assessments need to be accurate to ensure each resident receives the care they need. The findings include: On 10/31/2022 at 9:25 AM, surveyor completed initial screening and interviews with Resident #59. During that interview, Resident #59 notified the surveyor that s/he recently was discharged from hospice. Furether review of Resident #59's medical record on 11/04/22 07:22 AM revealed that on 7/27/2022 a significant change minimum data set was initiated as s/he was picked up for hospice. Further review revealed that on 10/4/2022 s/he was released from hospice secondary to his/her diagnosis. A concurrent review of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-11-17 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation and interview, it was determined the facility staff failed to administer medications as ordered by the physician (Resident #3,and #42). This was evident for 2 out of 56 residents reviewed during an annual survey. The findings include: 1. Review of Resident #3's medical record on 11/2/22 revealed the Resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis of heart disease. Further review of the Resident's medical record revealed the Resident had a cardiology consult on 10/11/22. Review of the Cardiology Office/Clinic Note revealed the Cardiologist ordered the Resident to start on Imdur 30 mg daily. Imdur is used to prevent chest pain in patients with coronary artery disease. Review of Resident #3's Medication Administration Records for October and November 2022 revealed the Resident was not receiving Imdur. Interview with the Director of Nursing on 11/4/22 at 10:05 AM confirmed the facility staff failed to order Imdur for the Resident following his/her…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-11-17 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on a review of the clinical records and staff interview, it was determined that the facility staff failed to document the administration of pain medication on the electronic medical record, assess, and monitor the effectiveness. This was true for 1 (#26) out of the 56 residents reviewed for pain management during an annual recertification survey. The findings include: Pain is often regarded as the fifth vital sign in healthcare because it is accepted now in healthcare that pain, like other vital signs, is an objective sensation rather than a subjective one. As a result, nurses are trained and expected to assess pain. A component of pain assessment-focusing on words to describe pain, intensity, location, duration, and aggravating or alleviating factors. It is the expectation that the facility staff assesses pain before and after administering pain medication to determine its effectiveness. On 11/3/22 at 11:00 am a medical record review for Resident #26 the physician ordered 10/03/2022: Oxycodone (pain medication) 5mg, give 1 tablet by mouth every 6 hours as needed for pain.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-11-17 · tag F0923 — isolated
    Have enough outside ventilation via a window or mechanical ventilation, or both.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on surveyor observation, it was determined that the facility failed to have adequate ventilation to ensure good air quality circulation to keep the 2nd floor of the facility odor free. This was evident for one of two floors. The findings include: On 11/03/22 at 1:33 PM, immediately upon entering the 2nd floor hallway, an observation and brief walk of second floor hallway with the Maintenance Manager ( Staff #13). All the ventilation duct filters on the hallway were accumulated with dirt and dust. This surveyor's interview with staff #13 about the last time the ventilation duct was cleaned. Staff # 13 stated that they have never been clean during his 8 years employment with the facility. The replacement and cleaning of the ventilation ducts will facilitate good air quality and circulation and prevent the growth of molds. This finding was confirmed with the maintenance manager at the time of the observation. All nursing care centers must provide for adequate and functional operated exhaust ventilation, as necessary to control moisture and odors. The Administrator was made aware…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2018-12-11 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — pattern
    Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medication cart observations and staff interviews it was determined the facility staff failed to ensure medical records were kept in a confidential manner. This was evident in 2 out of 3 medication carts involving Resident's (R#39) with nursing shift report during the survey process. The finding include: 1. On 12/6/18 at 12:00 p.m. on unit 2 long term care unit surveyor observed an unattended medication cart on the second floor with the nursing shift to shift report document unsecured and in view. This document is used by the facilities nursing staff for assigned nursing task preformed during the nurses shift on assigned residents. On this shift to shift report the surveyor was able to be view resident's names, room numbers for rooms 30A through 59C, residents' vital signs, medical treatments and assigned medications. On 12/6/18 at 12:15 p.m. staff #1 stated to surveyor that he/she was giving care. 2. On 12/7/18 at 9:23 a.m. on unit-2 long term care unit, surveyor observed an open lap top on top of an unattended medication cart with resident #39's medication record visible…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2018-12-11 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — pattern
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review and staff interview it was determined the facility failed to 1. obtain a physician's order to transfer Resident #323 to another facility, and 2. ensure hemodialysis communication record of treatment had the required licensed nurse signatures needed for nursing assessment prior, during and after dialysis treatment. This was evident for 3 of 33 residents (#323, #9 and #75) reviewed during the survey. The findings include: 1). Beginning on 12/7/18 at 1:4 PM, the medical record was reviewed. Review of Resident #323's medical record on 12/7/18 revealed physician documentation for 7/2/18 at 2:06 PM, which stated the following: .Follow/up for agitation .pt with dementia and behavioral issues was requiring a sitter, later d/ced (discharged ) and now discharged to dementia units for further care. Pt seen and examined today, reported to have behavioral disturbance over the weekend requiring ER (Emergency Room) visit and sitter. Per report psych recommended [ a specific psychiatric hospital] transfer for inpatient psych units but [the spouse] refused [his/her]…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2018-12-11 · tag F0623 — isolated
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on staff interview with the Director of Nursing (DON) and resident documentation, facility failed to contact Responsible Party (R.P.) to advise them that resident #64 was being transferred to the hospital. This was evident for 1 out of 4 residents transferred to the hospital. Findings include: Medical record review revealed Resident #64 was nonverbal and unable to follow commands. She/he was also noted to be total care for all her/his ADLs (activities of daily living) and had a peg tube. On 10/15/18 resident #64 was transferred from the facility for respiratory distress and hypoxia. Resident was found unresponsive, lethargic, tachypneic, O2 SATs were 75% on room air. The facility called the responsible party on 2 different occasions but was unable to reach him/her. There were no other notes indicating that the responsible party was ever notified. The Director of Nursing was aware and could not confirm whether the RP was notified or not.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2018-12-11 · tag F0625 — isolated
    Notify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on chart review and staff interview, the facility failed to give a bed hold policy for resident #64 who was transferred to the hospital. This was evident for 1 out of 4 residents transferred to the hospital. The findings include: On 12/10/18/at 9:18 AM a chart review conducted for resident # 64. Resident #64 had excess secretions requiring suction, lethargy and not responding appropriately. Resident #64 was admitted to the hospital on [DATE]. Review of nursing notes did not indicate that a bed hold policy was given to the resident or responsible party. Unit Clerk# 5 confirmed that there was no bed hold policy in the resident's chart and could not confirm whether a bed hold policy was sent out or given to resident. The Director of Nursing also could not confirm that a bed hold policy was provided to the resident.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2018-12-11 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on record review, the facility failed to develop a comprehensive care plan for a resident that received Remeron for depression. This was evident for 1 out of 33 residents (#110) reviewed for care plans. Findings include: Record review for Resident #110 on 12/10/18 at 12:50 PM revealed he/she had a history of recurrent depression and was placed on Remeron 15 mg tab per day at bedtime. Further record review did not indicate a comprehensive care plan that was completed for the resident being prescribed Remeron, a medication for depression. The Director of Nursing was made aware and confirmed there was no care plan available.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2018-12-11 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, medical record review and resident, family and staff interview it was determined the facility failed to ensure Resident #107 was shaved consistently. This was evident for 1 of 33 residents observed and investigated during the survey. The findings include: On 12/7/18 at 9;46 AM Resident #107 was observed unshaven and with what appeared to be several days growth. When asked if he/she liked to be shaved daily, she/he stated a preference of every other day but was told yesterday that the staff were busy and they would try to get to her/him today. Interview of Resident #107's spouse at 2:27 PM revealed that the resident is shaved by staff but not consistently. The resident's spouse also said the Geriatric Nursing Aides (GNAs) don't come in and offer to shave her/him but they will shave her/him when asked. During an interview with Unit Manager #4, she confirmed it is a GNA responsibility to shave the residents daily or according to their personal preferences. A review of the resident's Nursing Care Plan revealed Resident #107 required assistance with activities of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2018-12-11 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review and staff and resident interview it was determined the facility failed to ensure nursing staff clarified the definition of pain for as needed medications and failed to indicate the location and type of pain prior to administering as needed medications for Resident #77. This was evident for 1 of 33 residents assessed during the survey. The findings include: On 12/6/18 at 2:54 PM, Resident #77 was interviewed. When asked if he/she was having any pain issues, he/she stated sometimes he/she has pain in the hip and thigh and then asks for pain medication. When asked to rate pain on a scale from 0-10 with '0' being no pain and '10' being the worst imaginable, he/she stated it sometimes goes up to a 6 or an 8. Beginning on 12/11/18 at 3:05 PM, the medical record for Resident #77 was reviewed. It was noted that nursing staff had failed to clarify the definition of severe pain for an as needed medication and were not documenting the location and type of pain when administering as needed medication. A review of the Medication Administration Record (MARs)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2018-12-11 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation the facility failed to 1. label and store drugs/biological's in the 2nd floor Med room, and 2. secure the medication cart on the second floor. This was evident for 1 out of 6 medication carts inspected and 1 medication room out of 1 medication room checked. Findings include: On [DATE] at 11:19 AM, the following observations were made: 1). Medication cart labeled Med. Cart Team 1 CMA on second floor was stored in the resident lounge area with resident's present. The front of medication cart was facing the wall. When this surveyor moved the cart, it was found open with no staff present. The Unit Manager #9 was made aware and shown these findings. 2). The medication storage room had an open bottle of Clorpactin (1/4 filled) with no date of when opened, and a vial of Tuberculin was opened and not dated. Unit Manager #9 was made aware of these findings. 3). Medication Cart labeled team 2 CMA had three drugs that were not dated when opened or expired. Two bottles of Latanoprost eye drops for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2018-12-11 · tag F0801 — isolated
    Employ sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, including a qualified dietician.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on interview with acting dietary manager of the kitchen (Staff #6) it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that the acting dietary manager and full time dietary manager of the facility, (Staff #7) had completed required CDM (certified dietary manager) certification. The findings include: A tour of the facility kitchen was completed on December 6, 2018 at 9 AM. This surveyor was told by Acting Dietary manager Staff #6 who came from a sister facility, that the required certification was in process, but not complete. On 12/7/18 the facility Dietary Manager came back from vacation and was notified at 10:00 AM of the findings of the kitchen inspection the day before. At that time, he reported he was not a licensed CDM, but was waiting to schedule the test. The Administrator and Director of Nursing were made aware.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2018-12-11 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolated
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations and tour of the kitchen, the facility failed to properly store food and other items in the kitchen area. The findings included: On December 6, 2018, at 10 AM, this surveyor toured the facility kitchen with the food service acting manager staff #6. The following observations were made: 1) In the small dry storage area located in the kitchen two dry goods bins used for storing flour and breadcrumbs and were found with the date of 9/18. There was no year and no other dates noted. 2) In the large dry storage room located outside the kitchen, a plastic bag of cake mix was split open and sitting on the shelf. The contents of bag were spilling over other bags and onto the shelf. Additionally, empty soda cans were laying on shelves and dirty paper towels were thrown on the shelves. Boxes were on the floor toward the back of the storage room, blocking what was on the shelving unit. 3) Three unlabeled pitchers of orange juice, cranberry juice and fruit juice were in the refrigerator with no labels of when poured or expired. The manager (Staff #7) of the kitchen,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2018-12-11 · tag F0838 — failed to assess facility resources and resident needs — isolated
    Conduct and document a facility-wide assessment to determine what resources are necessary to care for residents competently during both day-to-day operations (including nights and weekends) and emergencies.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility records and staff interviews, the facility staff failed to include a required section of the Facility's Assessment Plan. The findings include: On 11/30/18 the facility's Assessment Plan was reviewed. The intent of the facility assessment is for the facility to evaluate its resident population and identify the resources needed to provide the necessary care and services the residents require. Part of that plan must include competencies/education needed by the staff to care for its listed patient population. Review of the plan did not include the training needed. The Director of Nursing was made aware.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2018-12-11 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation and staff interview it was determined the facility failed to ensure personal hygiene equipment was stored and labeled appropriately in a bathroom shared by Residents #70 and #74. This was evident for 2 of 33 residents investigated during the survey. The findings include: On 12/7/18 at 10:02 AM, the bathroom shared by Residents #70 and #74 was inspected. A commode urine specimen collector was found lying directly on the floor. A washbasin containing a toothbrush, toothpaste, denture cream, denture cup, razor, body wash/shampoo and shaving cream were noted on the back of the toilet. Neither the washbasin nor the items it contained were labeled with the resident's name or room and bed number. The findings were confirmed by Unit Manager #4.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to AUTUMN LAKE HEALTHCARE — 59 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 4 of 52.8+1.2 vs chain
Health inspection 4 of 52.5+1.5 vs chain
Staffing 2 of 52.4-0.4 vs chain
Quality measures 4 of 54.3-0.3 vs chain
The other 58 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.8★, per CMS)
1 of 5Autumn Lake Healthcare At Crystal SpringsElkins, WV 1 of 5Autumn Lake Healthcare At Glen BurnieGlen Burnie, MD 1 of 5Autumn Lake Healthcare At HomewoodBaltimore, MD 1 of 5Autumn Lake Healthcare At Long GreenBaltimore, MD 1 of 5Autumn Lake Healthcare at GreenfieldMilwaukee, WI 1 of 5Nella's At Autumn Lake HealthcareElkins, WV 2 of 5Ashbrook Care & Rehabilitation CenterScotch Plains, NJ 2 of 5Autumn Lake Healthcare At Arlington WestBaltimore, MD 2 of 5Autumn Lake Healthcare At Ballenger CreekFrederick, MD 2 of 5Autumn Lake Healthcare At Baltimore WashingtonGlen Burnie, MD 2 of 5Autumn Lake Healthcare At BridgeparkBaltimore, MD 2 of 5Autumn Lake Healthcare At CatonsvilleCatonsville, MD 2 of 5Autumn Lake Healthcare At Glade ValleyWalkersville, MD 2 of 5Autumn Lake Healthcare At Loch RavenBaltimore, MD 2 of 5Autumn Lake Healthcare At MadisonMadison, CT 2 of 5Autumn Lake Healthcare At Memorial BridgePenns Grove, NJ 2 of 5Autumn Lake Healthcare At NorwalkNorwalk, CT 2 of 5Autumn Lake Healthcare At OverleaBaltimore, MD 2 of 5Autumn Lake Healthcare At PikesvillePikesville, MD 2 of 5Autumn Lake Healthcare At RuxtonTowson, MD 2 of 5Autumn Lake Healthcare At Salem CountySalem, NJ 2 of 5Autumn Lake Healthcare At SouthgateCarneys Point, NJ 2 of 5King David Nursing And Rehabilitation CenterBaltimore, MD 2 of 5The Subacute At Autumn Lake HealthcareVoorhees, NJ 3 of 5Autumn Lake Healthcare At Alice ManorBaltimore, MD 3 of 5Autumn Lake Healthcare At Calvert ManorRising Sun, MD 3 of 5Autumn Lake Healthcare At Chesapeake WoodsCambridge, MD 3 of 5Autumn Lake Healthcare At Chevy ChaseChevy Chase, MD 3 of 5Autumn Lake Healthcare At Patuxent RiverLaurel, MD 3 of 5Autumn Lake Healthcare At Perring ParkwayBaltimore, MD 3 of 5Autumn Lake Healthcare At RiverviewEssex, MD 3 of 5Autumn Lake Healthcare At Silver SpringSilver Spring, MD 3 of 5Autumn Lake Healthcare At Spa CreekAnnapolis, MD 3 of 5Autumn Lake Healthcare At Summit ParkCatonsville, MD 3 of 5Autumn Lake Healthcare At VinelandVineland, NJ 3 of 5Autumn Lake Healthcare At VoorheesVoorhees, NJ 3 of 5Autumn Lake Healthcare At West HartfordWest Hartford, CT 3 of 5Autumn Lake Healthcare Post-Acute Care CenterBaltimore, MD 3 of 5Autumn Lake Healthcare at BeloitBeloit, WI 3 of 5Autumn Lake Healthcare at OceanviewOcean View, NJ

Showing 40 of 58; lowest-rated first.

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleSince
8710 EMGE HOLDCO LLCOrganizationDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 05/01/2021
A&R STERN FAMILY MD1 HOLDINGS LLCOrganizationINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 05/01/2021
HATZLACHA RABBAH LLCOrganizationINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 05/01/2021
STERN, ARYEHIndividualINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 05/01/2021
SCHWARTZ, MARKIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 05/01/2021
BHARAJ, NARENDERIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 06/27/2023
NOZEA, VALERIEIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 05/01/2023
EIDLISZ, SOLOMONIndividualINDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNFsince 03/27/2025
GLUCK, RIVKAIndividualINDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNFsince 03/27/2025

CMS files one row per role, so the 12 rows in the source record cover these 9 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

3 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$16.5M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-1.0%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$3.3M
Related-party expense20% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 75%Medicare 18%Other / private 7%

About 75% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $3.3M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 20% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$424per resident / day
operating cost
$12,891per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$420per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in MD

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Maryland Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Maryland
$12,927/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$14,448/mo
Nursing home (private)
$7,173/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 215129. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-07-25, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next