No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Franklin Woods Center

9200 Franklin Square Drive, Baltimore, MD 21237 · For profit - Corporation · 117 certified beds · (410) 391-2600 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (410) 391-2600 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse/neglect citation on record (F0600) — cited Aug 2021
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • a strong health-inspection score (4/5) — the hardest rating to game (though it’s ranked within its own state, not nationally)
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Aug 2021
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0605, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (46) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • about 19% of its spending goes to commonly-owned related companies

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

4/5
CMS overall
4 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 4 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 3 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 4 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★ 3/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
5235 King Avenue, Franklin Square Professional Center, Suite 200
Pharmacy
9103 Franklin Square Dr Ste 1800 · (443) 777-6201 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
9544 Philadelphia Rd · (410) 574-0500 · Call to confirm hours
Park
8700 Philadelphia Rd · (410) 682-9637 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
9202 Philadelphia Rd · (410) 682-4114

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 4 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 2 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 5 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 2 to 3 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating3★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased30.3%20.4%15.4%worse
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight7.1%5.4%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.9%0.5%0.9%typical
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.9%1.5%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms24.4%22.8%6.5%typical for the state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.0%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury1.8%2.4%3.3%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication15.2%16.7%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%96.6%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers6.7%5.9%4.7%worse
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control31.1%25.0%21.2%worse
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table16.3%13.8%17.1%typical
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.9%1.1%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine97.5%80.6%79.4%better
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission18.2%21.0%22.6%better
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit7.6%9.8%12.0%better
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days1.131.331.67better
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days1.421.201.80better

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

62.0% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 711 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

62.0%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
16.1%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
55.6%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.56U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.24hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.21hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.11hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 55.6% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 169 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.56 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 86% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 21% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF62.0%CMS range 58.9–66.251.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024better than U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF16.1%CMS range 13.7–18.310.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024worse than U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge55.6%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge53.2%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge56.8%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified91.6%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting98.7%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge96.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.3%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened5.7%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization8.8%CMS range 6.6–11.17.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.101.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

1.35
RN hours/ resident / day
0.62
LPN hours/ resident / day
1.71
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.68
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.93
RN hoursweekends
49.5%
Total nursing turnover
34.4%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 117 beds and averages 105.3 residents a day — about 90% occupied, or roughly 12 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.68 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 1.35 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.71 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.15 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.90 on weekdays — 19% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.52 to 0.93 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 50% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

11
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-05-13)
14
at the previous standard inspection (2021-08-18)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

46 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 36 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-05-13 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations and interviews with facility staff, it was determined that the facility: 1) failed to ensure refrigerator temperatures were monitored and food items were labeled, and 2) failed to store and prepare food in accordance with professional standards. This was evident for 2 of 2 kitchen observations, and for 2 of 2 nourishment refrigerators observed during the annual survey. The findings include:1) During a tour of the 1st floor's nourishment room on 05/12/25 at 07:34 AM the surveyor identified:- no visible log of daily temperatures for the refrigerator- no internal thermometer identified in the freezer - the last documented temperature was documented on 5/9/25- one 20 oz cup with a straw, containing a brown colored liquid in the freezer- one container of Butter Pecan ice cream , opened, no resident label- two Thick & Easy bottles, opened with out an open date/resident label in the refrigerator- one 40 ounce bottle of applesauce, opened, without an 'open date/resident label in the refrigerator- one 32 ounce liquid coffee creamer, opened, no labelDuring a tour of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-05-13 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and interviews it was determined that the facility staff failed to consistently maintain infection control practices related to clean linen on the unit. This deficient practice was evidenced in 2 linen closets on the lower level. The findings include: On 05/08/25 at 11:17 AM while on the lower level with the Director of Nursing (DON), the surveyor observed the door to the linen closet open. The DON apologized for the door being open and closed the door. At 11:21 AM while on [NAME] with the DON the linen closet door was open, and the DON closed the door and verbalized that the staff are aware that the door should be closed. On 05/08/25 at 12:47 PM during an interview with Infection Preventionist (IP) #4 the surveyor asked what the expectation of the staff in relation to infection control practices of the linen in the closets on the units. The expectation is for them to keep the door closed. An in-service was completed with the staff to ensure the doors are kept closed. Maintenance would…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-13 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations and interviews it was determined that the facility failed to provide Resident #69 with a reasonable accommodation of need. This was found evident during one random observation on the survey. The findings include: On 5/12/25 at 8:08 AM, the surveyor observed Resident #69 tell the Geriatric Nursing Assistant (GNA) #10 that he/she was wet and needed assistance being changed. The surveyor observed GNA #10 tell Resident #10 that she would change him/her after she assisted him/her with eating breakfast. Next the surveyor observed GNA #10 go and assist Resident #69's roommate with his/her breakfast tray. On 5/10/25 at 8:10 AM, the surveyor asked GNA #10 if she had anyone to assist her with her work. She stated she had colleagues but concluded that they were assisting feeding their assigned residents. On 5/12/25 at 8:16 AM the surveyor observed GNA #11 walk into Resident #69's room and talk to GNA #10 and then leave the room. On 5/12/25 at 8:18 AM, the surveyor interviewed GNA #11 in the hallway. During the interview the GNA confirmed that she was not asked to help…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-13 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolated
    Prevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview it was determined that the facility failed to appropriately prescribe a psychotropic medication for a resident without a diagnosed need for one. This was found evident in 1 (Resident #38) out of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The findings include: Psychotropic medications are used to treat mental health disorders and are considered any drug that affects behavior, mood, thoughts, or perception. There are five main types of psychotropic medications, and each type has its own specific uses, benefits, and side effects. The five main types are: antidepressants, anti-anxiety, stimulants, antipsychotics and mood stabilizers. On 5/08/25 at 10:47 AM, the surveyor reviewed Resident #38's medical record. The review revealed that Resident #38 was admitted in early February 2025. On further review it was noted that a Psychiatry progress note was written on 2/12/25 by Psychiatric Nurse Practitioner, NP #18, that stated a gradual dose reduction was recommended for Seroquel (also known as Quetiapine, an antipsychotic medication that treats…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-13 · tag F0628 — isolated
    Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, and interviews, it was determined the facility failed to notify the Ombudsman of resident's transfers and failed to provide the Resident and/or Representative with a written notice of the facility's bed hold policy upon transfer to an acute care facility. This was found evident for 1 (Resident #67) of 5 residents reviewed for hospitalization during the survey. The findings include: On 5/7/25 at 2:06 PM, the surveyor reviewed Resident #67's medical record. The review revealed that in early January of 2025 Resident #67 was transferred to the hospital and the Resident's daughter was notified of the transfer. On 5/8/25 at 11:50 AM, the surveyor requested the bed policy notice that was given to Resident #67's Responsible Party (RP) along with the notice to the Ombudsman for Resident #67's January 2025 transfer to the hospital. On 5/8/25 at 12:42 PM, the surveyor conducted an interview with the Director of Nursing (DON). During the interview the DON confirmed that the bed hold information was not given to Resident #67's RP. On 5/12/25 at 9:33 AM, the surveyor…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-13 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and medical record review, it was determined that the facility staff failed to ensure the development of comprehensive person-centered care plans as evidenced by failure to develop an integrated care plan to address a resident's needs related to hearing loss. This was found to be evident for 1 (Resident #24) out of 4 residents in the care plans reviewed during the survey. The findings include: A care plan is a guide that addresses the unique needs of each resident. It is used to plan, assess, and evaluate the effectiveness of the resident's care. On 05/07/25 at 10:12 AM During a floor round, an issue was brought up that Resident #24 had an unresolved problem of difficult hearing, and the facility staff were made aware. Further observation, this resident was not wearing the hearing aids at that time. Record Review, on 05/08/25 at 11:22 AM, found that Resident #24's hearing aids were checked on 3/17/2025 by an Audiologist and both hearing aids were functioning and fit well in good working order. The Audiologist's recommendation was the following: nurse…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-13 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, record reviews, and interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a dependent resident's personal hygiene needs were provided according to resident preference. This was evident for 1 (Resident # 76) of 3 residents reviewed during the annual survey. The findings include: The MDS is a federally mandated assessment tool that helps nursing home staff members gather information on each resident's strengths and needs. Information collected drives resident care planning decisions. MDS assessments need to be accurate to ensure each resident receives the care they need. On 05/07/25 at 8:40 AM, the surveyors held an interview with Resident #76 who indicated they had not received a shower in the past two weeks. During that time, the resident mentioned receiving a bed bath, which they did not request. On 05/08/25 at 09:34 AM, a follow-up interview with the resident revealed that s/he did not receive a shower. On 05/08/25 at 09:37 AM, an interview with the Geriatric Nursing Assistant (GNA), Staff #19, confirmed that the resident would be assisted…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-13 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide treatment to prevent further decreased range of motion for residents. This was found evident of 2 (Resident #74 & #65) out of 5 residents reviewed for mobility. The findings include: 1a) On 5/7/25 at 9:10 AM, the surveyor interviewed Resident #74. During the interview Resident #74 stated that he/she could not move his/her left arm. The surveyor noted Resident #74's arm next to him/her. There was no splint or supportive device noted. On 5/12/25 at 8:25 AM, and at 11:01 AM, Resident #74 was observed and noted not to be utilizing anything to support his/her left arm. Next the surveyor reviewed Resident #74' s Occupational Therapy (OT) notes. On the discharge summary note written from OT it stated, Resident #74 has tolerated wearing left upper extremity orthotic for 6 hours and functional maintenance program in place for nursing staff to carryover. On 5/13/25 at 11:13 AM, the surveyor conducted an interview with the OT #16. During the interview OT #16 stated that Resident #74…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-13 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, review of the medical record and interview with facility staff it was determined the facility failed to provide necessary respiratory care services for residents by failing to date label oxygen administration equipment as prescribed. This was evident for 2 ( #17 and #37 ) of 5 residents reviewed for Respiratory Care.The findings include:A nasal cannula is a device that delivers oxygen directly to a person' nostrils via a flexible plastic device. On 5/7/2025 at 12:22 PM the surveyor observed during initial screening noted that the tubing for the oxygen nasal canula at Resident #37's bedside were not labeled as to when they were put into use or when it should be replaced. A physician's order was written on 1/19/2025 to change tubing and labeling the respiratory elements with the time and date. The order also required the tubing to be changed every seven days.In a follow-up observation on 5/9/2025 at 1:14 PM. It was again noted that the nasal canula tubing was not labeled with the date it was put into use. The surveyor requested the policy regarding the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-13 · tag F0810 — isolated
    Provide special eating equipment and utensils for residents who need them and appropriate assistance.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, observation and interview, it was determined the facility staff failed to provide a resident with assistive devices as ordered. This was evident of 1 (Resident #65) of 10 residents reviewed for food concerns during the survey process. The findings include: On 5/7/25 at 8:50 AM the surveyor observed detailed instructions on eating posted in Resident #65's room. On 5/7/25 at 12:06 PM, the surveyor conducted an interview with Resident #65's family member. The family member stated that he/she had not seen the specialized spoon that his/her parent was supposed to have recently. Next the surveyor reviewed Resident #65's care plan. A care plan related to dysphagia (difficulty swallowing) was initiated in April of 2024. One of the interventions listed was, provide rehabilitation eating devices: adaptive spoon and scoop bowl during meals. On 5/12/25 at 8:09 AM, the surveyor observed Geriatric Nursing Assistant (GNA) #10 assist Resident #65 with his/her meal. No specialized spoon or bowl were observed on the tray. On 5/12/25 at 11:11 AM, the surveyor conducted an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 36 citations
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-13 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interviews, and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain medical records in accordance with acceptable professional standards and practices by keeping complete and accurate documentation. This was found evident in 2 (Resident #38 & #65) out of 33 residents reviewed during the survey. The findings include: 1a) On 5/7/25 at 9:43 AM, the surveyor conducted an interview with Resident #38. During the interview Resident #38 stated that he/she washed him/herself up at the bedside and was never offered to be set up for a shower. On 5/8/25 at 12:46 PM, the surveyor conducted an interview with the Director of Nursing (DON). During the interview the DON stated that shower days are established on admission. She further stated that the Geriatric Nursing Assistants GNA's utilize shower book to document the showers. The surveyor requested the documented showers for Resident #38. On 5/13/25 at 6:44 AM, the surveyor conducted a follow-up interview with the DON. During the interview the DON stated that she had spoken to the GNA's and that Resident #38 refused…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2021-08-18 · tag F0730 — widespread
    Observe each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of employee files and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility staff failed to put a system in place to ensure that Geriatric Nursing Assistants (GNA) were evaluated annually. This was found to be evident for 5 out of 5 GNA employees (GNA #31, #32, #33, #34, #35) reviewed for annual evaluations. This deficient practice has the potential to affect all the residents in the facility. The findings include: During review of the employee files on 08/16/2021 at 10:02 AM, the surveyor was unable to locate annual evaluations for GNA #31, 32, 33, 34, and #35. During an interview conducted on 08/16/2021 at 11:45 AM, the DON stated that he/she was unable to confirm that annual evaluations had been conducted for GNAs #31, #32, #33, #34, and #35. During an interview conducted on 08/16/2021 at 12:02 PM, the Workforce Coordinator #38 stated that the facility policy required that he/she send a list to management for each department. The list provided staff names and due dates for annual performance evaluations. The Workforce Coordinator stated that the list had been sent…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2021-08-18 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations of the facility's kitchen food services, and staff interview, it was determined that 1.) The facility failed to maintain food service equipment in a manner that ensured sanitary food service operations, and 2.) The facility staff failed to serve beverages in a manner that ensured sanitary food distribution during meal service to rooms. This was identified while observing the facility's dish washing machine in operation and meal distribution service to residents' rooms. The findings include. 1.) On 8/11/21 at 10:45 AM, during an observation of the facility dishwasher with the food service director, it was revealed that the temperature of the wash water was not reaching the minimum requirement of 160 degrees Fahrenheit (F). The food service director acknowledged that the wash temperature gauge was only reading 140 degrees F and indicated that the facility's maintenance man was notified. On 8/13/21 at 12:16 PM, review of the Machine Warewashing Sanitizing Log and the Manual Warewashing…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2021-08-18 · tag F0801 — pattern
    Employ sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, including a qualified dietician.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on interview of facility staff, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure a full-time clinically qualified nutrition professional for the oversight of food preparation and the daily kitchen operation. All the resident's in the facility have the potential to be affected by not having a qualified nutritional profession with the appropriate competencies and skill sets to carry out food and nutrition services. The findings include: On an initial tour of the facilities kitchen on 8/10/21 at 9:05 AM, it was revealed that the full time Food Service Director (staff # 4) was not clinically qualified as per Federal and state regulations. The food service director indicated that his predecessor had abruptly left and he was placed in-charge. Upon interview, he indicated that he was not a Certified Dietary Manager (CDM). He indicated that he has completed some of the educational course work towards becoming a CDM. Upon request for written documentation of the foodservice director's credentials on 8/11/21, no documentation was provided.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-08-18 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations and interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure residents received their meal in a timely manner. This was found to be evident for 1 (resident #21) out of 7 residents observed for dining. The findings include: During a tour conducted on 08/10/21 at 12:22 PM, surveyors observed the lunch cart arrive to the 2nd floor nursing unit. At 12:48 pm, the surveyor observed Resident# 21 lying in his/her bed, and their roommate (resident #40) was sitting in a wheel chair. Resident# 40 stated that he/she had already eaen lunch and that their lunch tray had been removed from the room. Resident #21 stated that he/she had not yet received a lunch tray. During an interview on 08/10/2021 at 12:49 PM, the Unit Manager (UM) #10 stated that Resident #21's tray was not delivered to their room, because he/she normally ate lunch in the dining room. The UM went on to say that the kitchen was contacted 4 times to request that resident #21's lunch tray be delivered to their room. At 12:52 PM, The surveyor observed that resident #21's tray was delivered. Afterward,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-08-18 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of medical records and interview with residents, their representatives and facility staff, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that transportation arrangements were made for a resident who required wheelchair-enabled transport for a known medical appointment. This was evident for 1 (Resident #147) of 43 residents reviewed during the survey. The findings include: The surveyor reviewed Resident #147's medical record on 8/17/21 at 10:18 AM. The review revealed that Resident #147 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] following hospitalization for a complex fracture of the left ankle. Review of discharge paperwork from the hospital indicated that the resident had an orthopedic appointment scheduled for 6/1/21 at 9:42 AM. Review of the resident's physician orders in the electronic medical record system revealed an order, dated 5/27/21, that stated, Follow up appointment, orthopedic 6/1/21 @ 9:40 AM, [physician's name, address, and telephone number]. The surveyor interviewed Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-08-18 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of resident medical records and interview with residents, their representatives, and facility staff, it was determined that the facility failed to notify a recently discharged resident or their representative of a positive COVID-19 test. This was evident for 1 (#146) of 43 residents reviewed during the survey. The findings include: In the course of investigating a complaint, the surveyor interviewed Resident #146's responsible party (RP) on 8/18/21 at 12:12 PM. During the interview, the resident's RP stated that the resident was hospitalized on [DATE]. The RP stated that, upon arriving to the hospital, the resident was tested for COVID-19 and the result of the test was positive for COVID-19. The RP stated that s/he had never been told by the facility that Resident #146 had contracted COVID-19. The surveyor reviewed Resident #146's paper medical record on 8/18/21 at 1:20 PM. The review revealed that the resident was admitted to the facility in January, 2021, was hospitalized mid February, and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-08-18 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility staff failed to provide a clean shower room for the female residents on the first floor. This was evident for the female residents who wanted a shower on the rehabilitation unit. The findings include: On 08/10/21 at 7:50 am, this surveyor checked the women's shower room located on the Long term Care Unit for cleanliness. The surveyor observed dried brown matter on the floor, about 6 inches away from the drain. The second shower stall had a used mask on the shelf, gauze with a piece of tape was on the floor were observed in the left corner of the second stall. The fourth shower stall, near the bathroom, had a pail of standing water underneath a shower chair. The bathroom had a glove turned inside out and another glove on the floor. This surveyor observed a Daily Shower Room Cleaning log taped to the exit door. The cleaning log was removed and Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) #5 provided this surveyor with a copy. According to the log, the shower room was last cleaned 08/08/21, during the 7:00 am - 3:00 pm shift.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-08-18 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on resident record review and facility report of an incident, the facility failed to protect resident # 246 from verbal abuse. This was evident for 1 out of 2 reports of abuse. Findings include: A record review was conducted for resident # 246 on 8/16/21 at 11:28 AM. Resident # 246 reported in June 2019 that Geriatric Nursing Assistant (GNA) #20 leaned on her wheelchair and looked into her face and stated, 'you need an attitude adjustment. According to GNA# 20, resident # 246 was complaining about her roommate. GNA #20 did admit during an interview with the Director of Nursing held with her/him on 6/13/21 that he /she did make this comment. GNA #20 was placed on suspension until the facilty's investigation was completed and her/his employment was terminated on 6/19/21.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-08-18 · tag F0623 — isolated
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to notify the resident representative in writing for the reason that the resident was transferred to the hospital. This was found to be evident for 1 (resident # 27) out 3 residents reviewed for transfer and discharge. The findings include: Record review of resident # 27's medical records, conducted on 08/13/2021 at 10:32 AM, revealed that resident # 27 was transferred to the hospital on [DATE] and 07/28/2021. Further review of resident # 27's medical records failed to reveal documentation that the resident representative was provided a reason in writing for resident #27's transfer to the hospital on [DATE] and 07/28/2021. During an interview conducted on 08/13/2021 at 11:16 AM, the Unit Manager (UM) #10 confirmed that the resident representative did not receive the reason in writing for resident #27's transfer to the hospital on [DATE] and 07/28/2021. The UM stated the resident's representative resided at the facility, however,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-08-18 · tag F0625 — isolated
    Notify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews and interviews, it was determined the facility failed to provide a bed hold for a resident transferred to the hospital. This was found to be evident for 1 (resident #27) out of 3 residents reviewed for transfer and discharge.The findings include: A record review was conducted on 08/13/2021 at 1:25 PM for the Bed Hold Notice of Policy and Authorization form for resident #27's transfer to the hospital on [DATE]. The surveyor was unable to locate the Bed Hold Notice of Policy and Authorization form in the electronic medical record and physical chart. During an interview conducted on 08/13/2021 at 1:32 PM, the Unit Manager (UM) #10 confirmed that resident #27 did not have a Bed Hold Notice of Policy and Authorization form in the electronic medical record or physical chart. During an interview conducted on 08/13/2021 at 2:12 PM, the surveyor advised the Regional Corporate Nurse #13 of the Surveyor findings.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-08-18 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on review of resident medical record, the facility failed to develop a care plan for anticoagulant therapy for resident # 45. This was evident for 1 out of 7 records reviewed. Findings include: On 8/13/21 at 1:34PM, a record review was conducted for resident # 45. On 11/7/20, the physician ordered Heparin 5000 units for resident # 45. The instructions stated to give 5000 units of Heparin subcutaneously at 9 AM and 9 PM for clotting prevention. No care plan was initiated to address the use of anticoagulation medication. The corporate nurse manager was made aware and stated on 8/13/21 at 10:45 AM that no care plan was found for anticoagulant therapy.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-08-18 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolated
    Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interviews, the facility staff failed to notify residents receiving rehabilitation services of the activities available during their stay in the facility. This was evident for 3 (#30, #86, #34) of 4 residents reviewed for activities. The findings include: On 08/10/21 at 10:04 am, Resident # 30, who had been in the facility since early June 2021, verbalized that he/she was not aware that there were activities for the rehab residents to participate in. On 08/10/21 at 10:56 am, Resident #86 reported not knowing what activities were being offered at the facility. On 08/12/21 at 9:45 am, Resident #34 verbalized not knowing what activities were being offered. The resident had been in the facility since early June 2021. On 08/13/21 at 12:05 pm, an interview was completed with Staff #11, the Recreation Manager. Staff #11 verbalized that all residents admitted to the facility receive an activity assessment within five (5) days. Staff # 11 stated that an assessment is completed to determine their interests and preferences and the activities staff is responsible for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-08-18 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, medical record review, and interviews, it was determined that staff failed to follow physicians' orders for 2 of 2 residents reviewed (Residents #1 and #74). The findings include: 1) On 08/10/21 at 9:55 am, surveyor entered resident #1's room for an interview. The resident requested to speak with surveyor at a later time because he/she was trying to eat his/her breakfast. Resident#1 was observed having difficulty eating. On 08/12/21 at 8:35 am, surveyor entered Resident#1's room for an interview. The resident was observed struggling to eat breakfast due to tremors. No assistance from staff was provided to the resident at the time of the observation. On 08/12/21 1:45 pm, a review of Resident #1's medical record revealed that the resident had a diagnosis of Parkinson's disease. The resident was noted to have tremors. Further review of the record revealed an order, dated 08/03/21 at 7:00 am, for Resident #1 to receive assistance with meals at every shift due to the resident's tremors. On 08/13/21 at 9:08 am, in interview with RN #24 regarding Resident #1's need…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-08-18 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of resident medical records and interview with facility staff, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that neurologic checks, following a resident's unwitnessed fall involving a head injury, were completed accurately. This was evident for 1 (Resident #146) of 5 residents reviewed for accidents. The findings include: 'Neuro Check' is a term used to refer to neurological evalutations performed after a patient has had a potential neurological change. It is a standard of nursing practice to complete a neuro check at regular intervals following a resident's unwitnessed fall or a fall involving the resident's head. A Neurological Evaluation Flow Sheet is usually used to conduct these neuro checks. The form identifies the intervals when a neuro check should be performed (most often it is every 15 minutes for 2 hours, then every 30 minutes for 2 hours, then every hour for 4 hours, then every 4 or 8 hours for a few days). The purpose of the evaluation is to detect early neurological changes in a resident that may indicate a more significant problem that requires…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2018-09-11 · tag F0623 — pattern
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review and interview it was determined that the facility failed to have a system in place to notify a resident and the resident's representative of the reason for a hospital discharge in writing. This was found to be evident for 5 out of the 6 residents (Resident #13, #77, #35, #59 and #68) reviewed for hospitalization during the investigative portion of the survey. The findings include: 1) On 9/05/18 review of Resident #13's medical record revealed the resident had been discharged to the hospital and re-admitted to the facility on multiple occasions. At 10:19 AM the resident confirmed several hospitalizations but that nothing had been provided in writing in regard to the reasons for the hospitalizations. Further review of the medical record failed to reveal any documentation that a summary of the reason for the hospital discharges had been provided to the resident. 2) On 9/5/18 review of Resident #77's medical record revealed the resident had been discharged to the hospital in August and re-admitted several days later. Further review of the medical record…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2018-09-11 · tag F0625 — pattern
    Notify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review and interview with staff it was determined that the facility failed to have a system in place to provide a written copy of the facility's bed-hold policy to a resident and/or the resident's representative at the time of discharge to the hospital. This was found to be evident for 5 out of the 6 residents (Resident #13, #35. #59, #68 and #77) reviewed for hospitalization during the investigative portion of the survey. The findings include: 1) On 9/05/18 review of Resident #13's medical record revealed the resident had been discharged to the hospital and re-admitted to the facility on multiple occasions. On 9/5/18 at 10:19 AM the resident confirmed several hospitalizations but that nothing had been provided in writing in regard to the bed-hold policy. Further review of the medical record failed to reveal any documentation that a copy of the bed-hold policy had been provided to the resident at time of discharge to the hospital. 2) On 9/5/18 review of Resident #77's medical record revealed the resident had been discharged to the hospital in August and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2018-09-11 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation of medication pass and of medication carts it was determined that the facility failed to maintain and store medications safely and securely. This was determined and evident for 1 medication pass and 3 of 5 medication carts observed. The findings include: Observation of medication pass on [DATE] at 8:57 AM Nurse #15 was observed passing medication to Resident #200. Resident #200 stated that s/he did not want to take his/her Plavix that morning and the nurse left it on the medication cart unattended as the medication pass was completed in the resident's room. A Lidocaine patch for Resident #27 was also observed on the cart left unattended and reported to of been from a previous medication pass according to Nurse #15 Review of medication cart #1 revealed a vial of tuberculin tuberculin test or PPD (purified protein derivative) was found in the medication cart on [DATE] at 9:21 AM. Nurse #15 was asked if any residents were given a PPD test this morning and she stated no. The vial stated 'to be…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2018-09-11 · tag F0552 — isolated
    Ensure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review, interview with facility staff and resident it was determined that the facility failed to go to the resident to get consents for treatment when the resident had capacity to make medical decisions based on a physician assessment completed in the facility. This was determined during the investigative portion of the survey and found to be evident for 1 of 52 residents (#36) reviewed during the survey. The findings include: During the initial tour and attempted interview with Resident #36 on 9/4/18 at 9:03 AM Resident #36 was noted in his/her bed attempting to eat breakfast. Screening questions were asked of Resident #36 however, s/he was not able to answer the questions with certainty and therefore was marked as non-interviewable. Surveyor re-attempted to interview the resident on 9/5/18 at 2:57 PM and again the resident was unable to answer the questions that are part of the survey process. Review of Resident #36's medical record on 9/5/18 revealed resident was admitted with a hip fracture status post a fall at home, with noted muscle weakness and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2018-09-11 · tag F0572 — isolated
    Give residents a notice of rights, rules, services and charges.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of Resident Council minutes, interviews with residents and staff, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents were informed of his or her rights and of all rules and regulations governing resident conduct and responsibilities during his or her stay in the facility. The findings include: On 9/11/18 the surveyor met with members of the Resident Council. During the meeting it was revealed that they did not remember if the facility gave them a copy of the Resident's [NAME] of Rights. They further revealed that it may have been in the admission packet and they acknowledged if it was given on admission then it was sent with family members and they do not recall what the resident's rights are. The resident council members also revealed that the facility never reviews or discuss the resident's rights at any of the meetings, they further verbalized that reading the resident's rights at each meeting would be a nice way of knowing what rights they have. Review of the minutes from the resident council meeting failed to reveal any documentation indicating…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2018-09-11 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review and interview it was determined that the facility failed to report and investigate an incident in which a resident, who was cognitively impaired, was found on the floor with a laceration to the head. This was found to be evident for 1 out of 3 residents (Resident #32) reviewed for accidents during the investigative portion of the survey. The findings include: Review of Resident #32's medical record revealed the resident has a diagnosis of dementia and history of falls. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments completed in May 2018 revealed the resident had severe cognitive impairment as evidenced by BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) score of 5 out of 15. A BIMS score of 0 - 7 indicates a severe cognitive impairment. Review of the medical record revealed a Change in Condition Evaluation completed on 6/29/18 which included the following: Had a fall with a cut of 3.5 cm to the right side of [his/her] head. The nurse practitioner was notified at 9:00 PM and ordered the resident sent to the emergency room for evaluation. Further review of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2018-09-11 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review and interview with staff it was determined that the facility failed to have an effective system in place to ensure activity assessments were completed by activity staff during the assessment reference date (ARD) look back time period for the comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment. This was found to be evident for 3 out of 4 residents (Resident #55 and #77) reviewed for completion of section F- Preferences for Customary Routine and Activities for the annual MDS assessment. The findings include: The MDS is a federally mandated assessment tool used to identify resident needs and help with the development of the resident's plan of care. On 9/11/18 review of Resident #55's comprehensive MDS with an ARD of 8/13/18 revealed answers to all of the questions in Section F-Preferences for Customary Routine and Activities to have been marked as not assessed. On 9/11/18 review of Resident #47's comprehensive MDS with an ARD of 5/20/18 revealed answers to all of the questions in Section F-Preferences for Customary Routine and Activities to have been marked…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2018-09-11 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interviews with facility staff and medical record review, it was determined that the facility failed to follow a resident's care plan related to a resident receiving the following medication categories: anticoagulant, sedative and an antibiotic. The facility also failed to develop a care plan for a resident with a Foley catheter and a resident's medical diagnosis and treatment of syncope. This was evident for 3 of 6 residents (#58, #68 and #202) reviewed for unnecessary medications. The findings include: A care plan is a guide that addresses the unique needs of each resident. It is used to plan, assess and evaluate the effectiveness of the resident's care 1. Review of the paper and electronic medical record for Resident #58 on 9/7/18 at 9:42 am revealed hospital discharge diagnosis' including cardiomyopathy (progressive heart disease in which the heart is abnormally enlarged, thickened, and/or stiffened), diabetes, syncope with loss of consciousness and bacterial urinary tract infections. Upon admission to the facility the resident was noted to be on insulin…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2018-09-11 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review and interview it was determined that the facility failed to accurately update a residents' care plans after falls resulting in a laceration to the head and failed to accurately reflect the residents' needs and current interventions to be provided. This was found to be evident for 2 out of the 4 residents (Resident #32 and #36) reviewed for accidents during the investigative portion of the survey. The Findings include: A care plan is a guide that addresses the unique needs of each resident. It is used to plan, assess and evaluate the effectiveness of the resident's care. 1. On 9/10/18 review of Resident #32's medical record revealed the resident has diagnosis of dementia and history of falls. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments completed in May 2018 revealed the resident had severe cognitive impairment as evidenced by BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) score of 5 out of 15. A BIMS score of 0 - 7 indicates a severe cognitive impairment. Further review of the medical record revealed the resident sustained falls on 6/29/18 and 7/18/18.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2018-09-11 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, interview with facility staff and observation it was determined that the facility failed to 1. get a physician order for a resident that was using a continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) machine, and 2. follow a physician order for daily weights on a resident. This was evident for 2 residents (#93 and #198) during the investigative portion of the survey. The findings include: 1. During initial tour observations and interview with Resident #93 on 9/5/18 at 10:12 AM surveyor observed a CPAP (positive airway pressure, which keeps the airways continuously open in people who are able to breathe spontaneously on their own) machine on the resident's night stand. Review of the resident's medical record revealed diagnosis including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and a care plan in place regarding CPAP use and respiratory therapy notes regarding treatment and care of the resident. Further review of the resident's physician orders failed to reveal a physician order for the use of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2018-09-11 · tag F0661 — isolated
    Ensure necessary information is communicated to the resident, and receiving health care provider at the time of a planned discharge.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review and interview with the facility staff, it was determined that the facility failed to complete a discharge summary on a resident to include a review of the resident's medications reconciled with the discharge medications and complete a physician discharge summary in a timely manner. This was evident in 2 of 3 residents (#198, #348) sampled for closed records reviewed during the investigative portion of the survey. The findings include: 1. Review of the closed medical record on 9/10/18 at 1:40 PM for Resident #198 revealed diagnosis including; muscle weakness, chronic kidney disease, and abnormal serum enzymes. Further review of the medical record revealed that the resident's daughter requested for the facility to discharge the resident home prior to the resident's end of skilled care time. A review of the discharge packet and physician summary failed to reveal a list of the medications including dose and frequency the resident was receiving in the facility reconciled with the medications that the resident was provided at time of discharge home. This…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2018-09-11 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review and interview with staff it was determined that the facility failed to ensure physician ordered wound treatment were completed as ordered. This was found to be evident for 1 out of 2 residents (Resident #83) reviewed for pressure ulcers during the investigative portion of the survey. The findings include: On 9/11/18 review of Resident #83's medical record revealed the presence of a facility acquired stage 4 pressure ulcer on the resident's buttocks. Review of the medical record revealed that from 4/26/18 until 6/5/18 the following order was in effect and being completed as ordered: Apply small foam dressing directly to patients sacrum boney prominence to assist with pressure relief to area every day and night shift. This order was discontinued on 6/5/18. Review of the nursing notes revealed on 6/5/18 : Resident found to have pressure area to sacrum, with skin open now and spoke to Hospice Nurse with TX (treatment) changed to hydrogel to sacrum q pm 9 every evening) and PRN as needed. A corresponding 6/5/18 order for: Clean Midline sacrum with Vashe,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2018-09-11 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review and interview it was determined that the facility failed to ensure dietary orders were submitted to the kitchen for implementation. This was found to be evident for 1 out of 5 residents (Resident #13) reviewed for nutrition. The findings include: Review of Resident #13's medical record revealed an order written on 8/28/18 to: Please serve high calorie snacks on each tray: cottage cheese, pudding, or jello three times a day. On 9/10/18 at 12:04 PM review of the resident's meal ticket failed to reveal any documentation about cottage cheese or pudding. Review of the Snack Summary for this resident for the week of 9/10/18 failed to reveal any documentation regarding the order for high calorie snacks on each tray. On 9/11/18 at 11:35 AM the Registered Dietician (RD #18) confirmed that the resident had been losing weight. She reported that she did not think the kitchen received the diet slip regarding the 8/28/18, stating whoever took it (the order) off didn't write the slip. On 9/11/18 at 12:02 PM nurse #17, who entered the order into the electronic health…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2018-09-11 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and review of medical records it was determined that the facility failed to document follow-up interventions for a patient when pain medication administered was coded as ineffective. This was evident during the review of 1 of 4 residents (#93) who triggered for pain management. The findings include: During observation of medication pass on 9/5/18 at 9:37 AM, Resident #93 was observed and interviewed. Resident was noted to receive Oxycodone, 15 mg for wound. At this time, surveyor was notified by the resident and the nurse that the resident has a large wound on his/her leg that requires medicinal pain management with additional medication administered prior to wound care. During the interview with Resident #93 regarding the effectiveness of the pain management s/he started to cry and reported to the surveyor that the pain gets so bad and uncomfortable. Surveyor asked the resident for permission to observe the wound care and the resident said that it would be ok. Review of Resident #93's medical record on 9/5/18 10:00 AM revealed diagnosis including encounter for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2018-09-11 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — isolated
    Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based upon the facility's assessment, record review and staff interview it was determined that the facility failed to have a system in place to assure that there is always enough qualified nursing staff available to provide nursing and related services to meet the residents' needs safely and in a manner that promotes each resident's rights, physical, mental and psychosocial well-being. This deficient practice has the potential to affect all residents in the facility. The findings include: The facility assessment is an evaluation of its resident population to identify the resources needed to provide the necessary person-centered care and services the residents require during both day-to-day operations and in emergencies. A review of the facility's assessment for staffing requirements in the facility was conducted on 09/10/18 at 9:13 AM. The assessment tool indicated that the Transitional Care Unit (TCU) and the Long-Term Care (LTC) unit required a specific number of direct care staff; Registered Nurses (RN) License Practical Nurses, and Geriatric Nursing Assistants (GNA) each 8-hour…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2018-09-11 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of medical records and interview with staff it was determined that the facility failed to have an effective system in place to ensure pharmacist review recommendations were addressed and acted on by the physicians. This was found to be evident for 1 out of the 6 residents (Resident #348) sampled for medication regimen review during the investigative portion of the survey. The findings include: On 9/11/18 Resident #348's medical records were reviewed. This review revealed that on May 13, 2018 a pharmacist completed the required monthly medication review. This review revealed irregularities with the resident's medications and recommendations were made. The pharmacist report revealed the following: (Resident #348) has an order for Lorazepam 0.5 milligram TID PRN (three times a day as needed) for anxiety since 4/27/18. Further review revealed that Lorazepam is a psychotropic medication that is ordered PRN which requires an evaluation and documentation of rationale for use of PRN psychotropics beyond 14 days. Pharmacist recommendation: Please review the use of Lorazepam…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2018-09-11 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolated
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations and interviews with the facility staff it was determined the facility failed to store foods properly by ensuring that foods are date labeled upon opening and expired food items are discarded. This was evident during a tour of the facility's main kitchen during the survey. Findings include: On 9/4/18 at 3:23 PM a tour of the kitchen was conducted and the Executive Chef accompanied the surveyor. The following concerns were identified: -Inside of the Walk-In Refrigerator there was 1 gallon of Mayonnaise, 1 plate of tuna fish and there were no date labels on these items as they were stored on the shelf. -Inside of the Walk-In Freezer there was 1 large package of sausage, 1 large sleeve of bagels, 2 large packs of burgers 30 each and there was no date label on these items as they were stored on the shelf. -Inside of the Dry Storage Area there was a box of cream of wheat that was opened, 1 gallon jug of Molasses with a 1/4 remaining in the container,1 gallon jug of Browning Sauce with 1/2 remaining in the container and there were no date labels on these items as they…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2018-09-11 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review and interviews with facility staff it was determined that the facility failed to ensure accurate medical record documentation as evidenced by Geriatric Nursing Assistants (GNA) documentation of the use of fall mats despite the discontinuation of the use of this intervention. This was found to be evident for 1 out of 3 residents (Resident #32) reviewed for accidents during the investigative portion of the survey. In addition, the facility failed to put a system in place to ensure that documentation for the infection antibiotic stewardship and infection control programs were consistent and accurate. This deficient practice has the potential to affect all residents in the facility. The findings include: 1. Review of Resident #32's medical record revealed the resident has diagnosis of dementia and history of falls. On 9/11/18 review of Resident #32's electronic medical record revealed GNA documentation in the TASKS section of the electronic health record of the use of a Fall Mat on 11 out of the past 14 days. Further review of the medical record failed to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2018-09-11 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and staff interview it was determined that the facility failed to put a system in place to maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for residents. This deficient practice has the potential to affect all resident, staff and visitors at the facility. Findings include: A line listing is a table in which important information is recorded on each person who is currently or potentially ill with an infection. It can be used to decide if an outbreak has occurred and to monitor the outcomes of persons affected in an outbreak. A review of the facility's Infection Prevention Program was conducted with the Infection Control Nurse (ICN) (staff #1) on 09/10/18 at 01:01 PM. She stated that a line listing is located at every nursing station in the facility and checked daily for new entries. She says the ICN is responsible to review documentation for residents noted with a change in condition, new or revised…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2018-09-11 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — isolated
    Implement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and staff interview it was determined that the facility failed to put a system in place to ensure that the procedures for the antibiotic stewardship program are put in place. This deficiency has the potential to affect all residents in the facility. Findings include: Antibiotic stewardship is a coordinated program used by healthcare facilities that promote the appropriate use of antibiotics and using the right antibiotic for each infection to improve patient outcomes and decrease the spread of infections caused by multi-drug resistant organisms. On 09/10/18 at 09:00 AM a review of the facilities antibiotic stewardship program was conducted with the Infection Control Nurse (ICN) (staff #1). Review of the facility's line listing revealed that the list failed to document residents' signs and symptoms and any laboratory reports to determine if the antibiotic was indicated or if adjustments were needed for residents receiving antibiotic treatments. Although the line listing provided a section to record the duration of treatment/illness, interview with the ICN…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · Bcited before2018-09-11 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interviews it was determined that the facility failed to have an effective system in place to ensure identification of wheelchairs in need of maintenance. This was found to be evident for 1 out of the 2 residents (Resident #83) identified with environmental concerns but has the potential to affect any resident with a wheelchair. The findings include: On 9/05/18 at 1:37 PM observation of Resident #83's wheelchair revealed that covering of one of the arm's of the wheelchair had several cracks and was not intact. On 9/7/18 at 11:06 AM the Administrator reported that there was no regularly scheduled preventative maintenance for wheelchairs and that they were cleaned as needed. On 9/11/18 the Director of Maintenance reported wheelchairs were serviced as needed. When asked if any repairs had occurred since the start of the survey the Director of Maintenance reported that a couple of (wheelchair) arms had been replaced the day before. On 9/11/18 at approximately 1:30 PM surveyor and Director of Maintenance toured the facility. During this tour Resident #83's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to GENESIS HEALTHCARE — 184 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 4 of 52.4+1.6 vs chain
Health inspection 4 of 52.3+1.7 vs chain
Staffing 3 of 52.5+0.5 vs chain
Quality measures 4 of 53.5+0.5 vs chain
The other 183 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.4★, per CMS)
1 of 5Alexandria Care CenterLos Angeles, CA 1 of 5Bay Crest Care CenterTorrance, CA 1 of 5Bethlehem North Skilled Nursing And RehabilitationBethlehem, PA 1 of 5Bethlehem South Skilled Nursing And RehabilitationBethlehem, PA 1 of 5Bridgeville Rehabilitation & Care CenterBridgeville, PA 1 of 5Brightwood CenterFollansbee, WV 1 of 5Carlisle Skilled Nursing And Rehabilitation CenterCarlisle, PA 1 of 5Casa De Oro CenterLas Cruces, NM 1 of 5Devonshire Care CenterHemet, CA 1 of 5Gettysburg CenterGettysburg, PA 1 of 5Glenwood CenterFlorence, AL 1 of 5Heritage CenterHuntington, WV 1 of 5Hidden Valley CenterOak Hill, WV 1 of 5Inners Creek Skilled Nursing And Rehabilitation CeDallastown, PA 1 of 5Jersey Shore Skilled Nursing And Rehabilitation CeJersey Shore, PA 1 of 5Kingston Court Skilled Nursing And RehabilitationYork, PA 1 of 5Las Palomas CenterAlbuquerque, NM 1 of 5Lebanon Center, Genesis HealthCareLebanon, NH 1 of 5Lebanon Skilled Nursing And Rehabilitation CenterLebanon, PA 1 of 5Linden Grove Health Care CenterPuyallup, WA 1 of 5Magnolia RidgeGardendale, AL 1 of 5Marmet CenterMarmet, WV 1 of 5Meridian CenterHigh Point, NC 1 of 5Merry Wood LodgeElmore, AL 1 of 5Mount Olive CenterMount Olive, NC 1 of 5Mountain Ridge Center, Genesis HealthCareFranklin, NH 1 of 5Oak Grove CenterWaterville, ME 1 of 5Oceanside Skilled Nursing And RehabilitationHampton, NH 1 of 5Orchard Park Health Care & Rehab CenterTacoma, WA 1 of 5Parkersburg CenterParkersburg, WV 1 of 5Pembroke CenterPembroke, NC 1 of 5Pine LodgeBeckley, WV 1 of 5Playa Del Rey CenterPlaya del Rey, CA 1 of 5Pocahontas CenterMarlinton, WV 1 of 5Pottstown Skilled Nursing and Rehabilitation CentePottstown, PA 1 of 5Putnam CenterHurricane, WV 1 of 5Ridgewood CenterRidgewood, NJ 1 of 5Rio Rancho CenterRio Rancho, NM 1 of 5River City CenterDecatur, AL 1 of 5River Ridge CenterKennebunk, ME

Showing 40 of 183; lowest-rated first.

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
FRANKLIN WOODS JV LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST50%since 04/01/2011
PARKWAY VENTURES, INC.Organization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST50%since 12/01/2003
FC-GEN OPERATIONS INVESTMENT LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 02/02/2015
GEN OPERATIONS I LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 02/02/2015
GEN OPERATIONS II LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 02/02/2015
GENESIS HEALTHCARE INCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 02/02/2015
GENESIS HEALTHCARE LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 02/02/2015
GENESIS HOLDINGS LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 02/02/2015
GHC JV HOLDINGS LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 02/02/2015
SUN HEALTHCARE GROUP INCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 02/02/2015
WHITMAN, ARNOLDIndividual5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 12/31/2011
BERG, MICHAELIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 12/01/2012
BRIDGEFORD, LAURAIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 01/01/2024
MENDELSON, AVIIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 06/01/2024
MAYS, PATRICIAIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 03/24/2025
MIRZA, ZIADIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 03/20/2025
MORRIS, DIANEIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 04/01/2024

CMS files one row per role, so the 19 rows in the source record cover these 17 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

10 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$17.7M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
+13.0%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$2.8M
Related-party expense19% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 51%Medicare 34%Other / private 15%

This home reported $2.8M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 19% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$390per resident / day
operating cost
$11,857per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$448per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in MD

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Maryland Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Maryland
$12,927/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$14,448/mo
Nursing home (private)
$7,173/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 215261. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-05-13, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next