Larkin Chase Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

Met the expected recovery: 53.3% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 105 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.75 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 93% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 15% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 120 beds and averages 68.6 residents a day — about 57% occupied, or roughly 51 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.69 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 1.23 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.54 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.24 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.87 on weekdays — 16% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.35 to 0.94 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are unchanged from the previous inspection. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

This trend is not current. The most recent of these two inspections was over 4 years ago; the arrow describes what inspectors found then, not what the home is like now.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

25 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 13 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · Jdisputed · IIDR2026-04-14 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
  Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to promptly notify the provider of a critical and abnormal laboratory test values for 1 (Resident #7) of 3 sampled residents reviewed for a change in condition. On [DATE], Resident #7 experienced a change in condition and a nurse practitioner (NP) ordered STAT (a Latin word, statim, which meant immediately or without delay) laboratory tests to rule out pneumonia and assess for other possible underlying causes of the resident's change in condition. The blood specimen was collected for the laboratory tests, which revealed the resident had a high critical sodium level of 161 millimoles per liter (mmol/L). This critical laboratory value was communicated to the facility nursing staff on [DATE]; however, the provider was unaware of the results until [DATE]. After review of the resident's clinical status and laboratory test results, concern was expressed by the providers for the resident's deterioration and agreed the resident required…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Immediate jeopardy · Jdisputed · IIDR2026-04-14 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure a STAT (a Latin word, statim, which meant immediately or without delay) chest x-ray was completed as ordered and timely provider notification of a critical and abnormal laboratory test values for 1 (Resident #7) of 3 sampled residents reviewed for a change in condition. On [DATE], Resident #7 experienced a change in condition and a nurse practitioner (NP) ordered a STAT chest x-ray and STAT laboratory tests to rule out pneumonia and assess for other possible underlying causes of the resident's change in condition. The STAT chest x-ray was not completed on [DATE]. The blood specimen was collected for the laboratory tests, which revealed the resident had a high critical sodium level of 161 millimoles per liter (mmol/L). This critical laboratory value was communicated to the facility nursing staff on [DATE]; however, the provider was unaware of the results until [DATE]. After review of the resident's clinical status and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-04-14 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — pattern
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure there was an order to perform wound care when Resident #6 was identified to have an in-house acquired Stage 2 pressure ulcer. The facility further failed to ensure an order to perform wound care was transcribed and implemented for Resident #9's in-house acquired Stage 3 pressure ulcer; notify the Lead Registered Dietician of the resident's new pressure ulcer; and ensure there was not inconsistencies in how the resident's pressure ulcer was assessed and documented. These failures affected 2 (Resident #6 and Resident #9) of 3 sampled residents reviewed for pressure ulcer/injury.Findings included: A facility policy titled, NSG236 Skin Integrity and Wound Management, revised 09/15/2025, revealed PURPOSE To provide safe and effective care to promote optimal skin health, prevent injuries, and promote healing within the context of what matters most to all patients. The policy specified, 6.7 Notify interdisciplinary team members…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-14 · tag F0552 — isolated
  Ensure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to obtain consent prior to the use of psychotropic medications for 2 (Resident #6 and Resident #7) of 14 sampled residents. The findings included: 1. A Face Sheet revealed the facility admitted Resident #6 on 02/02/2026. According to the Face Sheet, the resident had a medical history that included diagnoses of anxiety disorder and primary insomnia. An admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 02/09/2026, revealed Resident #6 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, which indicated the resident had intact cognition. The MDS indicated the resident used an antianxiety medication during the last seven days. Resident #6's Care Plan Report included a focus area initiated 02/11/2026, that indicated the resident was at risk for complications related to the use of psychotropic drugs. Interventions directed staff to provide informed consent to resident or healthcare decision maker (initiated 02/11/2026). Resident #6's Order Recap Report for the timeframe 02/01/2026 - 03/31/2026,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-14 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview, record review, document review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to timely report an allegation of abuse to the state survey agency for 1 (Resident #5) of 8 sampled residents reviewed for abuse.Findings included: A facility policy titled, Abuse Prohibition, revised 11/14/2025, revealed, 7. Immediately upon receiving information concerning a report of suspected or alleged abuse, mistreatment, or neglect, the Administrator or designee will perform the following 7.1 Enter allegation into PCC [Point Click Care] Risk Management Portal. 7.2 Report allegations involving abuse (physical, verbal, sexual, mental) not later than two (2) hours after the allegation is made. A Face Sheet revealed the facility admitted Resident #5 on 12/04/2025. According to the Face Sheet, the resident had a medical history that included a diagnosis of muscle weakness. A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 02/09/2026, revealed Resident #5 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 13, which indicated the resident had intact…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-14 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
  Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview, record review, document review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure staff assigned to care for a resident was interviewed once the resident voiced an allegation of neglect for 1 (Resident #1) of 8 sampled residents reviewed for abuse.Findings included: A facility policy titled, OPS300 Abuse Prohibition, revised 11/14/2025, indicated 7.7 Initiate an investigation within 24 hours of an allegation of abuse that focuses on: 7.7.1 whether abuse or neglect occurred and to what extend; 7.7.2 clinical examination for signs of injuries, if indicated; 7.7.3 causative factors; and 7.7.4 interventions to prevent further injury. 7.8 The investigation will be thoroughly documented within the Risk Management Portal. Ensure that documentation of witnessed interviews is included. A Face Sheet revealed the facility admitted Resident #1 on 07/02/2025. According to the Face Sheet, the resident had a medical history that included a diagnosis of muscle weakness. A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 12/29/2025, revealed…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-14 · tag F0641 — isolated
  Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview, record review, and document review, the facility failed to ensure the accuracy of a Minimum Data Set (MDS) for 1 (Resident #9) of 3 sampled residents reviewed for pressure ulcer/injury. Findings included: On 04/14/2026 at 8:59 AM, Clinical Advisor #32 stated the facility did not have a policy regarding completion of the MDS; however, they followed the Resident Assessment Instrument manual. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services Long-Term Care [LTC] Facility Resident Assessment Instrument [RAI] 3.0 User's Manual dated 10/2024, indicated If the medical record reveals that the resident currently has a pressure ulcer/injury, a scar over a bony prominence, or a non-removable dressing or device, the resident is at risk for worsening or new pressure ulcers/injuries. Per the LTC Facility RAI 3.0 User's Manual, Code 1, yes: if the resident had any pressure ulcer/injury (Stage 1, 2, 3, 4, or unstageable) n the 7-day look-back period. A Face Sheet indicated the facility admitted Resident #9 on 08/05/2025. According to the Face Sheet, the resident had a medical history…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-20 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolated
  Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and staff interviews, the facility failed to protect residents private information during medication administration. This had the potential to affect 14 of 73 residents information.During observation on 2/19/26, a medication cart was observed between rooms [ROOM NUMBERS] from 9:55 am until 9:59 am, with the Electronic Health Records visible on the computer screen for 14 of 73. Several visitors and staff members were seen walking along the hallways past the medication cart. Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) 23 walked out of room [ROOM NUMBER], approached the medication cart, and locked it, but did not close the Electronic Health Records (EHR).During the interview on 2/19/23 at 9:59 am, LPN #23 confirmed s/he was the nurse responsible for the medication cart and that s/he had left the EHR visible, with resident information displayed.During the interview on 2/19/23 at 10:04 am, the Director of Nursing (DON) stated that the expectations are for nursing staff to protect residents' personal health…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-02-20 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interviews, and review of facility policy titled 'Medication Storage-Storage of Medications', the facility failed to ensure 1 of 4 medications carts was locked when not in use.Review of facility policy titled 'Medication Storage-Storage of Medications' dated 01/25 revealed 'Procedures 3. To limit access to prescription medication, only licensed nurses, pharmacy staff, and those lawfully authorized to administer medication (such as medication aides) may access medication carts. Medication rooms, cabinets, and medication supplies should remain locked when not in use or attended by people with authorized access.'During observation on 2/19/26, a medication cart was observed between rooms [ROOM NUMBERS], unlocked and unattended from 9:55 am until 9:59 am. Several visitors and staff members were seen walking along the hallways past the medication cart. Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) 23 walked out of room [ROOM NUMBER], approached the medication cart, and locked it.During the interview on…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-06-14 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations and interviews it was determined that the facility failed to ensure: 1) food items were stored properly and 2) staff practiced appropriate use of gloves. This deficient practice has the potential to affect all residents. The findings include: 1) During a tour conducted of the kitchen's refrigerator on 06/06/2022 at 11:50 AM, the surveyors, the District Dietary Manager # 6 and District Dietary Manager # 7 observed 1 opened and undated box of rice, 1 jar of Peanut Butter opened and undated, 1 container of ground turmeric opened and undated, 1 bag of Parmesan cheese opened and undated, and 1 bottle of Kikkoman Soy Sauce that expired on 05/15/2022. 2) During a tour conducted in the kitchen on 06/06/2022 at 12:05 PM, the surveyors and District Dietary Managers # 6 and # 7 observed Dietary Aide # 8 on the tray line. The Kitchen Aide moved empty breakfast trays down the tray line without the use of gloves. During an interview conducted on 06/06/2022 at 12:06 PM, the District Dietary Manager # 6 stated the kitchen policy required staff to wear gloves during food and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2022-06-14 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  Based on observations and interviews it was determined the facility failed to ensure resident rooms were kept in a home like environment. This was found to be evident for 2 (Resident #72 and #87) out of 8 resident rooms observed during the re-certification survey. The findings include: During a tour conducted on the 200-nursing unit on 06/07/2022 at 7:45 AM, surveyors observed Resident #87's closet door lying inside of the resident's closet. During the continued tour of the 200-nursing unit on 06/07/2022 at 7:52 AM, surveyors observed two holes in the wall above the footboard near the entry door of the bathroom in Resident # 72's room. An interview conducted on 06/07/2022 at 1:22 PM, the surveyor advised the Administrator and Director of Nursing (DON) of the observations.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2022-06-14 · tag F0624 — isolated
  Prepare residents for a safe transfer or discharge from the nursing home.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, the facility failed to notify the Ombudsman and Responsible Party in writing that Resident # 75 was sent to the hospital. This was evident for 1 out of 1 resident reviewed for hospitalization. The findings include: On 6/6/22 at 12:39 AM, a medical record review was conducted for Resident # 75. The record revealed that on 1/25/22: General: Patient was admitted /readmitted for the following reason(S): Teaching and Training Nutrition management cancer Gastrointestinal disease/disorder Management of Diabetes Pain Management The pt. had been hospitalized for greater then 5 days. Additional details about this note: Resident [AGE] year old male admitted with history of rectal cancer. Status/Post (S/P) sepsis, rhabdomyolysis and AKI; Colostomy to left side of abdomen. Resident diabetic with hypertension; Accordion drain to right upper back; No known allergies. The record revealed that on 2/10/22: Resident was sent out to the hospital for further Evaluation due to low H&H, MD (Doctor) and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

“Disputed” is CMS’s own flag, not our reading: the CMS deficiency file records whether the home has formally contested a citation, and we reproduce that. IDR is Informal Dispute Resolution, run by the state survey agency that wrote the citation; IIDR is Independent Informal Dispute Resolution, a separate process before an outside entity, available when CMS has proposed a civil money penalty. They are different processes and we mark them differently. Two things to hold at once. A disputed citation is still a citation — it was written by a surveyor, it stands on the record unless and until it is changed, and we neither hide it nor discount it. And we cannot tell you how the dispute came out: CMS publishes that a citation is under dispute, not the outcome, so a tag marked here may since have been upheld, reduced, or deleted, and an unmarked tag may have been disputed and resolved before this file was cut. Ask the home what it disputed and why — it is entitled to tell you, and the answer is often the most informative thing on this page.

Fines & penalties

$127,440 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $127,440 — penalty dated 2026-04-14

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to GENESIS HEALTHCARE — 184 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 23 rows in the source record cover these 20 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

13 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

What families pay in MD