No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Autumn Lake Healthcare At Oak Manor

3415 Greencastle Road, Burtonsville, MD 20866 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 145 certified beds · (240) 970-5600 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (240) 970-5600 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse-prevention, restraint, or reporting citation — no harm found (F0609) — cited Apr 2026Resident-funds citation (F0569)Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0758)1 immediate-jeopardy citation CMS recorded as corrected before the inspection ended (past non-compliance)$11,381 in federal fines
Insights

The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.

In its favor
  • a middle-of-the-pack inspection score (3/5)
Worth asking about
  • it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • it has a citation for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0569)
  • inspectors recorded 1 serious finding as past non-compliance — the problem was found, fixed, and verified before the survey closed, so it is history rather than a current condition, but it is still worth asking what changed
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (40) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $11,381 in federal fines (most recent 2025-07-01)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • about 23% of its spending goes to commonly-owned related companies

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

4/5
CMS overall
4 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 3 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 3 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 5 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★ 3/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
3905 National Dr · (301) 421-4233 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
13814 Outlet Dr · (301) 890-7015 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
13814 Outlet Dr · (301) 847-9884 · Call to confirm hours
Park
Columbia Park, 14898 Old Columbia Pike · (301) 495-2595 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
3404 Greencastle Rd · (240) 560-7795

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 5 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 4 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 5 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 4 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating4★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased30.1%20.4%15.4%worse
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight5.8%5.4%5.4%typical
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.2%0.5%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection1.1%1.5%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms5.5%22.8%6.5%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.0%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury0.5%2.4%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened32.0%22.2%16.1%worse
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication3.8%16.7%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%96.6%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers6.3%5.9%4.7%worse
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control24.8%25.0%21.2%worse
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table2.8%13.8%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.3%1.1%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine85.1%80.6%79.4%typical
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission25.2%21.0%22.6%worse
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit6.6%9.8%12.0%better
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days1.221.331.67better
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days1.041.201.80better

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

54.1% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 348 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

54.1%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
15.2%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
67.7%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.45U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.19hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.21hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.05hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 67.7% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 124 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.45 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 76% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 21% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF54.1%CMS range 48.0–57.851.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF15.2%CMS range 13.0–17.610.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024worse than U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge67.7%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge50.8%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge45.2%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified98.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting51.8%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge92.9%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened2.8%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization10.0%CMS range 7.2–12.77.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024worse than U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.131.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.64
RN hours/ resident / day
1.12
LPN hours/ resident / day
1.87
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.63
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.55
RN hoursweekends
38.7%
Total nursing turnover
47.1%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 145 beds and averages 126.9 residents a day — about 88% occupied, or roughly 18 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.63 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.64 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.87 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.33 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.75 on weekdays — 11% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.67 to 0.55 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 39% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

14
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-04-07)
11
at the previous standard inspection (2025-02-19)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

40 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 29 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2025-07-01 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on administrative and medical record review, observations and interviews with facility staff and family it was determined that the facility failed to prevent a cognitively impaired resident who is at risk for wandering from exiting the facility unsupervised. This was evident for 1 (Resident #1) of 4 residents reviewed during the facility's complaint survey. This failure resulted in an Immediate Jeopardy for Resident #1. The facility implemented effective and thorough corrective measures following this incident. The facility's plan and action were verified during this survey; therefore, this deficiency will be cited as past noncompliance. The date of correction was 6/27/25. The findings include: Medical record review on 6/30/25 at 10:00AM revealed that Resident #1's diagnoses included but were not limited to Alzheimer's Disease (a progressive brain disorder that slowly destroys memory and thinking skills). The resident has a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 3/15 indicating severe cognitive impairment. Review of a recent wander risk assessment completed on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-29 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on facility documentation, medical record review and interviews, it was determined the facility staff failed to treat a resident with dignity and respect. This was evident for 1 (Resident #6) of 6 residents reviewed during a compliant survey. The findings include:Review of Facility Reported Incident 3023073 was conducted on 5/27/26 regarding Physical Therapist (PT) #5 walking in on Resident #6 unclothed on 5/22/26.Review of Resident #6's medical record revealed the Resident was admitted to the facility for rehabilitation following a hospitalization in April 2026.Further review of Resident #6's medical record revealed the Resident was assessed on 4/21/26 by the facility staff to have a BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) of 15 out of 15, indicating the Resident is cognitively intact.During interview with Resident #6 on 5/27/26 at 11:30 AM, Resident #6 stated last Friday (5/22/26) he/she was in the bathroom with the door closed and unclothed from the waist up. The Resident stated a man from physical therapy (PT #5) knocked on his/her door. Resident #6 stated he/she said…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-29 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of complaint 2997160, medical record review, and interview, it was determined that the facility staff failed to notify the resident's physician/nurse practitioner when the resident had a change in vital signs that had the potential for physician intervention. This was evident for 1 (Resident #2) of 7 residents reviewed during a complaint survey.The findings include:On 5/28/26 at 7:47 AM a review of complaint 2997160 alleged communication concerns.Review of Resident #2's medical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility in January 2026 with diagnoses including cerebral infarction, hypertension, atherosclerotic heart disease, and inappropriate sinus tachycardia (a heart rhythm condition where the heart beats too fast for no apparent reason, exceeding 100 beats per minute (bpm) at rest). A normal resting heart rate is 60 to 100 bpm.Review of Resident #2's heart rates from January 2026 to 3/4/26 ranged from 57 beats per minute to 89 beats per minute.Review of Resident #2's March 2026 Medication Administration Record (MAR) revealed the resident's heart…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-29 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of complaint 2997160, medical record review, and interview, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain complete and accurate medical records in accordance with accepted professional standards. This was evident for 1 (Resident #2) of 7 residents reviewed during a complaint survey.The findings include: A medical record is the official documentation of a healthcare organization. As such, it must be maintained in a manner that follows applicable regulations, accreditation standards, professional practice standards, and legal standards. All entries to the record should be legible and accurate.On [DATE] at 7:47 AM a review of complaint 2997160 alleged concerns related to medications being delayed or missed.Review of Resident #2's medical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility in [DATE] with diagnoses including cerebral infarction, hypertension, atherosclerotic heart disease, and inappropriate sinus tachycardia (a heart rhythm condition where the heart beats too fast for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-04-07 · tag F0569 — pattern
    Notify each resident of certain balances and convey resident funds upon discharge, eviction, or death.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, it was determined the facility failed to notify residents receiving Medicaid benefits to spend down when their personal account reached within $200 of the SSI resource limit. It was evident for 8 residents (Resident #12, Resident #48, Resident #54, Resident #57, Resident #62, Resident #104, Resident #108, Resident #129) out of 73 residents reviewed for personal funds. The findings include: On 4/6/26 at 11 AM, a review of the facility's [fund management company] report dated 4/3/26 revealed 8 residents with personal accounts that exceed $2500, which is the SSI resource limit. Per this report:1). Resident #12 had $2625.53 in his/her personal fund account.2). Resident #48 had $3235.99 in his/her personal fund account.3). Resident #54 had $2831.18 in his/her personal fund account.4). Resident #57 had $3045.42 in his/her personal fund account. 5). Resident #62 had $2609.96 in his/her personal fund account.6). Resident #104 had $2958.31 in his/her personal fund account.7). Resident #108 had $2923.68 in his/her personal fund account.8). Resident #129…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-04-07 · tag F0641 — pattern
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to code the residents' status accurately on the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment. This was evident for 4 ( Resident #2, Resident #31 Resident #98 and Resident #129) of 6 residents reviewed for accuracy of assessments. The findings include: The Minimum Data Set (MDS) is a federally mandated comprehensive, standardized clinical assessment tool of all residents in nursing home. Staff members gather information on each resident's strengths and needs. Information collected drives resident care planning decisions. MDS assessments need to be accurate to ensure each resident receives the care that they need. 1.) On 03/30/2026 at 11:44 AM, the surveyor observed Resident #2. The resident's room had no fall mats or bed rails up. On 03/31/2026 at 9:50 AM, a review of records was conducted. Records revealed an admission MDS that was completed on 2/20/2026. MDS for restraints under section P0200, Alarms: Resident was coded for use of floor mat alarm as used less than daily. On 03/31/2026 at 10:33 AM, an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-04-07 · tag F0887 — pattern
    Educate residents and staff on COVID-19 vaccination, offer the COVID-19 vaccine to eligible residents and staff after education, and properly document each resident and staff member's vaccination status.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record reviews and interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to educate and provide COVID-19 immunizations to the residents. This was evident for 5 (Resident #28, #57, #48, #39, #12) out of 5 residents reviewed for immunizations during the recertification survey. The findings include: On 04/06/2026 at 2:20 PM, the surveyor requested the facility to provide COVID-19 policy and proof that Resident #28, #57, #48, #39 and #12 had been educated and offered COVID 19 vaccine in 2025. On 04/06/2026 at 2:30 PM, a review of records was conducted. Review of residents' electronic records indicated that Resident #28, #12, #48 and #57 had received COVID-19 immunizations on 11/11/2024. Resident #39 was last offered COVID-19 immunization in 2023. On 04/06/2026 at 2:55 PM, a review of the facility's COVID-19 vaccination policy indicated that all residents who are eligible for immunizations were to be educated and offered the vaccine annually. On 04/06/2026 at 2:33 PM, an interview with the Director of Nursing (DON) was conducted. She confirmed that the facility offers…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-04-07 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide services to maintain communication abilities to a resident with Limited English Proficiency (LEP). This was evident for 1 (Resident #98) out of 1 resident reviewed for communication. The findings include: During survey screening on 3/30/26 at 12:06 PM, Resident 98 stated, No English when the surveyor was trying to interview him/her. Later that day at 12:51 PM, the resident's daughter arrived for visitation. When asked, Resident #98's daughter stated that Resident #98 only speaks a few words of English and that his/her primary language was Vietnamese. She stated that the facility typically calls the family when they want to communicate information to the resident and the family informs him/her in Vietnamese. The daughter also stated that she was not aware of the facility ever using a language line to communicate directly with Resident #98. A review of Resident #98 's medical record on 3/30/36 at 1:15 PM revealed that…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-04-07 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to report an allegation of abuse in a timely manner. This was evident for 1 (Resident #139) out of 6 reviewed for abuse. The findings include: On 04/02/2026 8:00 AM, a review of incident 2685769 was conducted. Resident #139 alleged that a staff member hit them.On 4/02/2026 at 8:17 AM, a review of the facility investigation documentation was conducted. Staff #32 became aware of the incident on 12/4/2025 at 9:45 pm. The Nursing Home Administrator (NHA) became aware of the incident on 12/5/2025 at 10:30 am. The initial report submitted on 12/5/2025 at 12:40 pm.On 4/02/2026 at 10:21 AM, an interview with NHA was conducted. When asked how quickly staff should report an allegation of abuse when they are made aware. The staff should report the incident to the Director of Nursing (DON) or the NHA right away. When asked if the facility staff should have reported this incident to the NHA or DON sooner. Yes, typically they should notify Administration right away.On 4/02/2026 at 10:35 AM, a review of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-04-07 · tag F0628 — isolated
    Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview with facility staff, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure appropriate provision and documentation of notice of hospital transfer and bed hold policy to residents' responsible party (RP). This was evident for or 1(Resident #7) out of 3 residents reviewed for discharge process during the facility's recertification/complaint survey. The findings include: Oxygen saturation (SpO2) measures the percentage of oxygen-carrying hemoglobin in the blood, with a normal reading for healthy individuals typically between 95% and 100%. Levels below 90% are considered low (hypoxemia), which can cause symptoms like shortness of breath, confusion, and rapid heart rate. Urgent medical attention is required if levels drop to 88% or lower. Aspiration pneumonia is a lung infection caused by inhaling food, liquid, vomit, or saliva into the lungs, often causing symptoms like fever, cough, chest pain, and shortness of breath. The MDS (Minimum Data Set) is a federally mandated,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-04-07 · tag F0644 — isolated
    Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to refer the residents with a serious mental disorder for a level II assessment. This was evident for 2 (Resident #1 and Resident #9) out of 3 residents reviewed for PASARR. The findings include: 1). A review of Resident #1's medical record on 4/2/26 at 1:56 PM that Resident #1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] from a hospital with a documented diagnosis of schizoaffective disorder. Further review of Resident #1's medical record revealed a physician order on 2/2/26 for olanzapine (an atypical antipsychotic medication) 10 mg (milligrams) daily. Resident #1's admission MDS (Minimum Data Set) from 2/5/26 was coded in Section I Active Diagnoses that Resident #1 carried a diagnosis of Schizophrenia (I6000) and in Section N Medications, N0450 Review of Antipsychotic Medications coded Yes, antipsychotics were received on a routine basis. The PASARR that was initiated by the hospital on 2/1/26 at 10:07 AM contained no…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 29 citations
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-07 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, it was determined that the facility failed to review and revise the interdisciplinary care plans to reveal accurate interventions. This was evident for 1 (Resident #129) out of 2 residents reviewed for care plans during the survey process. The findings include: A care plan is a guide that addresses the unique needs of each resident. A care plan flows from each resident's unique list of diagnoses and should be organized by the resident's specific needs. The care plan is a means of communicating and organizing the actions and assuring the resident's needs are attended to. The care plan is to be reviewed and revised at each of the resident's quarterly assessment times to ensure the interventions on the care plan are accurate and appropriate for the resident. On 3/30/26 at 11:30 AM during screening observations, the surveyor observed that Resident #129 did not have any indwelling catheters and had wounds on his feet that were covered to contain any secretions. On 4/6/26 at 9:45 AM, the surveyor reviewed the Facility policy on Enhanced barrier…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-07 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observations, record reviews and interviews it was determined that the facility failed to maintain professional standards of practice related to oxygen orders. This was evident for 1 (Resident #49) out of 2 residents reviewed for respiratory orders. Findings include: On 03/30/2026 at 9:00 AM, an observation of Resident #49 revealed that the resident was receiving oxygen therapy. On 03/31/2026 at 9:42 AM, record review failed to reveal an active order for oxygen. On 04/01/2026 at 9:25 AM, concerns were brought up to the Director of Nursing and she indicated that she understood.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-07 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations and interviews it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a resident had access to their call bell. This was evident for 1 (Resident #49) out of 35 observations made on call bells. The findings include: On 03/30/2026 at 8:46 AM, an observation of Resident #49 revealed the call bell was on the floor and not within reach of the resident. On 03/31/2026 at 10:37 AM, an observation of Resident #49 revealed the call bell was on the floor and not within reach of the resident. On 03/31/2026 at 12:18 PM, an observation of Resident #49 revealed the call bell was on the floor and not within reach of the resident. On 04/01/2026 at 10:20 AM, an observation of Resident #49 revealed the call bell was on the floor and not within reach of the resident. On 04/01/2026 at 10:21 AM, an interview with Geriatric Nurse Assistant (Staff #15) revealed that the expectation regarding call bells is that it should be within reach at all times. At the same time, Staff #15 revealed that Resident #49 in particular does not have a clip on her call bell cord, making it difficult…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-04-07 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, staff interviews, and record reviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents received oxygen therapy in accordance with physician orders for 1 (Resident #45) of 2 residents reviewed for oxygen use. The facility also failed to develop a care plan to address oxygen therapy needs and failed to ensure that residents were not connected to empty oxygen tanks. The findings include:On 03/30/2026 at 11:15 AM, Surveyor observed Resident #45 on 3L of Oxygen via Nasal Cannula. On 03/30/2026 at 11:25 AM, an interview with Resident #45 was conducted. They reported that they were supposed to be on 2L of oxygen because of pneumonia. On 03/31/2026 at 10:15 AM, Surveyor observed Resident #45 on 3L of Oxygen via Nasal Cannula. On 03/31/2026 at 11:59 AM, a review of Resident #45's medical record revealed an active order to administer Oxygen via nasal cannula at 2 L/min every shift for COPD (a chronic lung disease). Additionally, review of the care plan failed to include oxygen therapy interventions. On 03/31/2026 at 12:01 PM, Surveyor observed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-04-07 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interviews, it was determined that the facility 1) failed to ensure that medication was available for administration as ordered and 2) failed to administer medications on time. This was evident for 1 (Resident #31) out of 5 residents reviewed for medication administration and 1 (Resident #144) out of 3 residents reviewed for medication administration. The findings include:1) Clonazepam (brand name Klonopin) is a Schedule IV controlled substance in the United States, regulated due to risks of misuse, addiction, and physical dependence. While it has accepted medical uses for treating seizure and panic disorders, its status requires restricted, prescription-only access. On 04/02/2026 at 2:38 PM, a review of Resident #31's medical record was conducted. The review revealed an order for Clonazepam that was entered on 3/16/2026, the day the resident was admitted into the facility. The review of the Medication Administration Review (MAR) indicated that the resident was not given the medication on 3/16/20 to 3/20/2026. Review of the nurses' notes on 3/17/2026…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-04-07 · tag F0825 — isolated
    Provide or get specialized rehabilitative services as required for a resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interviews and record reviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide physical therapy services as ordered. This was evident for 1 (Resident #6) out of 6 residents reviewed for therapy services during the recertification survey. The findings include: On 03/30/2026 at 8:36 AM, an interview with Resident #6 was conducted. They reported that they were supposed to receive Physical Therapy (PT) services 3 times a week, however, this rarely happened. On 04/01/2026 at 8:25 AM, a review of physical therapy notes revealed that in February Resident #6 had 3 PT sessions (17th, 18th, and 26th) and 5 sessions in March (11th, 12th, 20th, 24th, and 26th). Review of Resident #6's care plan revealed an intervention that indicated that the resident should receive physical therapy evaluation and treatment as per orders. Further review of records revealed an active order for the resident to continue skilled Physical Therapy 3-5 times per week for 90 days for therapeutic exercises. The review of a recent PT recertification completed on 3/19/26 indicated that Resident #6 should…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-07 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews and record reviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that staff adhered to enhanced barrier precautions when providing care to residents. This was evident for 1 (Resident # 87) out of 6 residents reviewed for infection control practices during the recertification survey. The findings include: Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) are an infection control strategy for nursing homes, requiring gowns and gloves during high-contact resident care to prevent the spread of Multidrug-Resistant Organisms (MDROs).A PICC line (peripherally inserted central catheter) is a long, thin, flexible tube inserted through a vein in the upper arm and advanced to a large vein near the heart. This tube is used to give intravenous (IV) medications to a patient. On 04/03/2026 at 08:30 AM, the surveyor observed Staff #31 give Resident #87 Fluticasone IV medication through a PICC line. Staff #31 was not wearing a gown, only gloves. Resident #87's door had a yellow sign that indicated EBP precautions to be followed when providing care or providing medications…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-02-19 · tag F0710 — pattern
    Obtain a doctor's order to admit a resident and ensure the resident is under a doctor's care.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review and interviews with facility staff it was determined the facility failed to address residents with significant weight loss. This was found to be evident for 1 (Resident # 122) of 3 residents reviewed for weight loss during the survey. Findings include: Resident # 122's medical record was reviewed on 12/19/25 at 10:00AM for weight loss. Upon review, it revealed the resident with an admission weight on 1/8/25 of 229.2 pounds and a weight one month later on 2/10/25 of 216.2 pounds. The resident was noted to have a significant weight loss of 13 pounds (10%) within 1 month. Review of the resident nutrition care plan on the same date at 10:25 AM reveals the care plan was initiated on 1/8/25 and one of the interventions listed was to notify the MD and dietician if resident had any significant weight changes. Review of a discharge summary note dated 2/11/25 from the residents' previous provider service indicated that the resident was morbid obese but did not address the significant weight loss of 13 pounds for one month. An interview was conducted on 2/19/25…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-19 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide a dignified dining room experience. This was evident for 1 (Resident #12) of 1 resident observed during the dinner dining observation. The findings include: On 02/18/25 at 5:05 PM, the surveyors arrived at the dining room to observe dinner at the facility. Residents were set up at tables and served by staff as they were seated. Resident # 12 was noted to be seated at a table with Resident #15. Resident #15 had a plate of food and was feeding themselves while Resident #12 was lying in a geri-chair with no plate in front of them. There were 2 cups (one of the cups contained juice) on the table in front of the Resident #12. Resident #15 spilled their juice into their plate. Staff #23 was working in the dining room and was serving other residents, and saw the resident spill the juice and remove the plate away from the resident. Before returning to assist Resident #15, Staff #23 retrieved utensils that had fallen onto the floor from another resident and discarded them, she then continued to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-02-19 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain a sanitary environment. This was evident for 2 out 2 clean utility rooms observed during the recertification survey. The findings include: On 2/18/25 at 9:29 AM, during observation rounds with the Geriatric Nursing Assistant staff #11, the second floor, Forest View, clean utility room had two intravenous poles with a brown and gray colored particle of solid matter covering the base of the poles. The intravenous poles did not have labels on it indicating that they were clean. On 2/18/25 at 9:50 AM, during observation rounds with the Central Supply Clerk staff #12, the first floor, Chapel Valley, clean utility room had three intravenous poles, with a brown and white colored substance located at the base of the poles, and one oxygen concentrator that was covered with a gray colored particle of solid matter. Neither the intravenous poles nor the oxygen concentrator had labels on it indicating that they were clean. On 2/18/25 at 9:50 AM, the Central Supply Clerk staff #12 was interviewed.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-19 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Review of medical records, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to obtain a GI (gastrointestinal) consultation as requested by the physicians for resident # 60. This was evident for 1 of 9 residents reviewed during the survey. The findings include: Review of Resident #60's medical record on 2/18/25 at 1:55pm revealed a physician ordered to obtain a GI (gastrointestinal) consultation for poor po (by mouth) intake and weight loss. Further review of the medical record on 2/18/25 at 3pm failed to reveal if a GI consultation was done or scheduled. During an interview with the Director of Nursing on 2/18/25 at 3:30pm pm she stated the consultation should have been scheduled and she would investigate it. After surveyor intervention the GI consultation was scheduled on 2/19/25 for March of 2025.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-02-19 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, medical record reviews, and interviews, it was determined that facility staff failed to address the nutritional needs of a resident who had a known significant weight loss. This deficient practice was evident for 1 (#89) of 1 resident reviewed during the survey. The findings include: On 02/13/25 at 7:53 AM, the surveyor observed Resident #89 awake in bed watching television. The resident appeared frail. During a follow-up interview on 02/13/25 at 12:53 PM, the resident reported difficulty with food, explaining that they are unable to keep food down and experience large bowel movements immediately after eating. On 02/14/25 at 9:34 AM, review of Resident #89's medical record revealed a medical diagnosis of diverticulitis (a condition where small pouches in the wall of the large intestine becomes inflamed or infected. This can cause nausea, vomiting, constipation, and diarrhea). Further review of medical records revealed an admission weight of 167.9lbs on 09/13/24. Resident was discharged to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-02-19 · tag F0711 — isolated
    Ensure the resident's doctor reviews the resident's care, writes, signs and dates progress notes and orders, at each required visit.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record reviews, observation, and interviews it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that the physician documented the medical history and treatment plan related to residents with significant weight loss. This was evident to be true for 2 (#48, #89) of 6 residents reviewed for excessive weight loss during the survey. The findings include: 1.) On 02/18/25 10:08 AM the surveyor observed the resident in bed covered with blankets and apparently sleeping. The resident's husband sat at the foot of the bed in a wheelchair with a mask in place. The resident's spouse stated that he/she came in this morning in order to ensure the resident ate his/her breakfast. The spouse stated the Resident #48 had a poor appetite and needs encouragement to consume her/his meals. On 02.18.2025 at 11:12 AM the surveyor reviewed the electronic medical record related to Resident # 48. This resident experienced the following weight losses and gains during a three month period: Weight Trends: 12.18.24: 163.9 lbs. 12.25.24: 160.4lbs. 01.14.25: 150.8lbs 02.04.25: 145.6 lbs Total weight…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-02-19 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — isolated
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on surveyor observation it was determined the facility failed to provide palatable food at an appetizing temperature. This was evident for 3 out of 3 hot food items checked on the test tray. This failure had the potential to affect all residents receiving meals. The findings include: On 02/18/25 at 01:01 PM, a test tray was requested at the end of food service in the Chapel Way dining area. The food temperature was checked using the facility's thermometer by Staff #16. The potatoes were 119.8 degrees Fahrenheit. The spinach was 109.2 degrees Fahrenheit. The meat (veal) was 123.1 degrees Fahrenheit. The internal temperature for hot food should be over 135 degrees Fahrenheit. During an interview with the Regional Dietary Manager on 02/28/25 at 1:06 PM, she verified the temperature. She stated that she and the Dietary Manager would be doing inservices on making sure foods are property temped.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-02-19 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record reviews, interviews, and observations, the facility failed to honor the residents' food preferences. This was evident to be true for 3 ( #13, #17, and #92) out of 10 residents observed dining during the survey. These findings include: On 02.19.25 at 08:16 AM the surveyor entered the multipurpose room [ROOM NUMBER] on the 2nd floor and there was only one resident present. Resident #92 stated that he/she had a lot of concerns regarding the facility and including the food service. Resident #92 stated that the facility often did not serve what was listed on the menu and often he/she was served food items that were not his/her preference. The surveyor observed that the kitchen staff had the tops off the food serving containers and were not currently serving food to any residents. The surveyor asked the dietary aides if they make an effort to keep the food warm for the residents. The dietary aides responded yes and then proceeded to cover the food serving containers. On 02.19.25 at 08:22 AM the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-19 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolated
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure sanitary practices were followed in accordance with professional standards for food service safety, and maintain a clean working environment, during the survey The findings include the following: On 2/13/25 at 08:25 AM, An initial tour of the facility Kitchen was completed with the Regional Dietary manager and the following was found: 1.Seven repoured unlabeled apple sauce containers were observed sitting on the dirty utility table. 2. A large white laundry basket with several soiled white linens was observed in the dry storage room. 3. Food and a liquid substance were noted on the kitchen floor near the walk in the freezer. 4. A red substance was noted to have spilled all over metal shelves in the facility's walk- in refrigerator. 5. The surveyor observed that the area designated for rinsing dirty dishes was found unkempt with food particles left in the strainer. During the interview on 2/13/25 at 09:30 AM with the Dietary Manager and the Regional Dietary Manager present he stated that the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-19 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews with facility staff it was determined the facility failed to document if interventions were put in place to address a resident with a significant weight loss, document a significant change in the resident's medical condition, failed to notify the physician, and interdisciplinary team. This was found to be evident for 2 (Resident # 122, #89) of 5 residents reviewed for weight loss during the survey. Findings include: 1.) Resident # 122's medical record was reviewed on 12/19/25 at 10:00AM for weight loss. Upon review, it revealed the resident with an admission weight on 1/8/25 of 229.2 pounds and a weight one month later of 2/10/25 of 216.2 pounds. The resident was noted to have a significant weight loss of 13 pounds (10%) within 1 month. Review of the resident nutrition care plan on the same date at 10:25 AM reveals the care plan was initiated on 1/8/25 and one of the interventions listed is to notify the MD and dietician if resident has any significant weight changes.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-19 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility staff failed to adhere to infection control practices. This was evident for 1 (Resident #15) of 1 resident observed during the dinner dining observation. The findings include: On 02/18/25 at 5:05 PM, the surveyors arrived at the dining room to observe dinner at the facility. Residents were set up at tables and served by staff as they were seated. Resident #15 had a plate of food and was feeding themselves. Resident #15 spilled their juice into their plate. Staff #23 was working in the dining room and was serving other residents, and saw the resident spill the juice and remove the plate away from the resident. Before returning to assist Resident #15, Staff #23 retrieved utensils that had fallen onto the floor from another resident and discarded them, she then continued to assist Resident #15 with feeding and did not sanitize her hands. The surveyors interviewed Staff #23 and made her aware of the concern about picking up the utensils and not performing good hand hygiene when providing service to a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-20 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and staff interview, the facility staff failed to provide supervision to prevent an accident (Resident #9). This was evident for 1 of 37 residents reviewed during an annual survey. The findings include: On 11/14/24, review of Resident #9's medical record revealed the Resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] from the hospital for rehabilitation. Further review of the medical record revealed that, on 2/24/2023, the Resident was assessed by facility staff to be at a low risk for elopement. The facility reported to OHCQ (Office of Health Care Quality) on 7/7/24 at 1 PM the Resident was found outside the facility at a local church approximately 2:30 PM by the Police. The Resident was brought back to the facility and assessed at that time and found to have no injuries. On 11/14/24 at 9:30 AM, an interview with Resident #9 revealed that she was going to the church service in the facility, and she was unaware of the cancellation. Resident stated she wanted to worship God, so she…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2020-10-20 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on surveyor review of the clinical record, surveyor observations and interviews with facility staff, it was determined that the facility failed to develop a comprehensive plan of care for residents. This finding was evident for 2 of 27 residents reviewed during the survey (Resident #44 and #64). The findings include: 1. On 10-13-2020 at 3:42 PM surveyor observation of Resident #44 revealed that the resident was yelling out constantly for staff for assistance. Further observation on 10-15-2020 at 12:26 PM revealed that the resident was yelling out again for staff response. Surveyor asked the resident why the resident was yelling out and the resident stated he/she wasn't sure. On 10-15-2020 surveyor review of the clinical record revealed in August 2020 the resident was ordered medication for delusional behavior and psychosis after an initial assessment visit by the facility's consultant psychiatrist. Further review revealed on 10-13-2020 that another visit was made by the consultant psychiatrist to address the resident's agitated behavior and increased the dose of the resident's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2020-10-20 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — pattern
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on surveyor review of the clinical record, surveyor observations and interviews with facility staff, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure consistent behavior monitoring of residents' use of psychotropic medications. This finding was evident for 3 of 6 residents selected during the Unnecessary Medication Review and Mood/ Behavior Reviews (Resident #44, #4, #64). The findings include: 1. On 10-15-2020 surveyor review of the clinical record for resident #44 revealed nursing documentation on 08-03-2020 at 6:53 AM that the resident's family had reported to staff that the resident had contacted them talking about driving on the highway, running out of gas , not having any money and saying that the family needed to come and pick up the resident. Family requested that the resident be assessed by the physician or a psychiatrist. Further review revealed nursing documentation on 08-03-2020 at 4:27 PM that the resident was told the assigned physical therapist about seeing kids in the resident's room. The consultant psychiatrist was notified by staff and was scheduled to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2020-10-20 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on surveyor review clinical record, observation, and interviews with facility staff, it was determined that the facility failed to provide an environment that promotes resident respect and dignity. This finding was evident in 1 of 27 residents (Resident #1) selected for this survey. The findings include: On 10-13-2020 at 8:30 AM, 3:16 PM and at 5:15 PM, surveyor observation of Resident #1 revealed a Foley catheter drainage bag (a Foley catheter is flexible tube which passes through the urethra and into the bladder to drain urine) hanging from the right side of the bed with no dignity bag (a bag which covers the Foley catheter's urine collection bag from plain sight) present. On 10-13-2020 at 5:20 PM, surveyor brought the Unit Manager into the room and asked her to identify the condition of the catheter collection bag. The Unit Manager acknowledged that there was no dignity bag over the collection bag. On 10-13-2020 at 5:24 PM, surveyor interview with the facility's Administrator provided no additional information.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2020-10-20 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on surveyor review of the clinical record and interviews with facility staff, it was determined that the facility staff failed to notify Resident #47's responsible party of the resident's weight loss. This finding was evident for 1 of 27 residents reviewed during the survey. The findings include: On 10-15-2020 surveyor review of the clinical record for Resident #47 revealed 09-03-2020 documentation by dietician #2 that noted after a review of the resident's weights, there was a 7% weight loss x 30 days. At that time, based on the dietician's recommendations, orders were obtained for a speech therapy screen, monitor of weekly weights and the addition of the dietary supplement, Boost Plus to be given twice daily. Further review revealed a speech therapy screen was completed for Resident #47 on 09-03-2020 with the implementation of Dysphagia (difficulty in swallowing ) Therapy three (3) to five (5) times a week for four weeks. However, there was no documented evidence in the clinical record that Resident #47's responsible party was notified of the 09-03-2020 significant weight…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2020-10-20 · tag F0582 — isolated
    Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on surveyor review of the clinical record, review of the Beneficiary Protection Notifications and interview with facility staff, it was determined that the facility failed to provide residents with the Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage (NOMNC) and Skilled Nursing Facility Advance Beneficiary Notice of Non-Coverage (SNFABN). This finding was evident for 2 of 3 residents selected for the Beneficiary Protection Notification review (Residents #8 and #15). The findings include: A Medicare health provider must give an advance NOMNC to enrollees receiving skilled nursing, home health (including psychiatric home health), or comprehensive outpatient rehabilitation facility services, no later than two days before the termination of services. The SNFABN provides information to the beneficiary in order to decide whether or not to get the care that may not be paid for by Medicare and assume financial responsibility. 1. On 10-15-2020 surveyor review of the clinical and administrative record for Resident #8 revealed 07-31-2020 would be the resident's last day of Medicare coverage for skilled…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2020-10-20 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on surveyor review of the clinical record, surveyor observation and interview with resident #31 and facility staff, it was determined that the facility staff failed to revise the comprehensive plan of care for Resident #31. This finding was evident for 1 of 27 residents reviewed during the survey. The findings include: On 10-15-2020 at 1:04 PM surveyor observation and interview with Resident #31 revealed that the resident had obtained a hearing aid for severe hearing loss of the left ear. The resident stated that its stored in the resident's top drawer of the bedside table when not wearing it . Further observation on 10-19-2020 at 8:54 AM, during a medication pass to Resident #31, revealed Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #3 and the Chapel Way unit manager were observed attempting to communicate to the resident about the medications and neither asked the resident whether the hearing aid was in place or its location until surveyor intervention. Record review revealed on 09-30-2020 Resident #31 had been fitted for and had received a left hearing aid. Staff added the hearing aid to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2020-10-20 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on surveyor review of the clinical record and interview with facility staff, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure standards of nursing practice. This finding was evident in 2 of 27 residents reviewed during the survey(Resident #64 and #28). The findings include: 1. On 10-14-20 at 10:20 AM, surveyor review of the clinical record for Resident #64 revealed a physician order written on 08-28-20 to check the resident blood sugar before each meal and notify the physician if the sugar level was less than 70 or above 300 per ML. Further record review revealed that on 09-10-20 the physician gave another order to discontinue the order that specified calling the physician when the sugar/glucose level was less than 70 and more than 300. The physician replaced the order with a sliding scale indicating insulin to be administered based on the resident blood glucose level. However, the facility nursing staff continued both orders and did not discontinue the previous order as indicated by the primary…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2020-10-20 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on surveyor observation, record review, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility staff failed to follow physician's orders. This finding was evident in 1 of 27 residents reviewed for quality of care during the survey (Resident #22). The findings include: On 10-13-2020 at 9:31 AM, surveyor observed Resident #22 had a left arm contracture. However, the resident did not have any splint on. On 10-13-2020 at 9:35 AM, medical record review of Resident #22 revealed the resident had a physician's order to don left elbow splint after AM care and doff after dinner. On 10-13-2020 at 12:22 PM and at 3:09 PM, surveyor observed Resident #22 without the left elbow splint. However, review of the resident's treatment administration record for October 2020 revealed LPN Staff #3 documented that the resident had the splint on at 9:00 AM on 10-13-2020. On 10-15-2020 at 11:12 AM, a telephonic interview with LPN Staff #3 revealed her documentation that she applied the splint on Resident #22 at 9:00 AM on 10-13-2020 was an error. On 10-14-2020 at 10:17 AM and 11:52 AM, surveyor…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2020-10-20 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on surveyor observation, review of clinical records, facility policy and procedures and interview with facility staff, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure infection control practices to prevent development and transmission of communicable disease and infections. This finding was identified during the observation of 3 of 3 resident during glucose testing (Resident #4, #64, and #188). The findings include: On 10-14-2020 at 7:10 AM, Surveyor review of the clinical records for Residents #4, #64 and #188 revealed a medical condition in which their body doesn't use insulin properly resulting in unusual blood sugar levels. Additional review revealed a physician order that stated check blood sugar before each meal. Give insulin per sliding scale. On 10-14-2020 at 7:30 AM, surveyor observed Staff #4 checking resident blood sugar prior to breakfast. Staff # 4 removed the glucometer (medical device for determining the approximate concentration of glucose in the blood) from a hand held basket to check…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · Ccited before2020-10-20 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on surveyor observation and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility staff failed to store and prepare, and serve food under sanitary conditions. This finding was evident in the facility's kitchen during the surveyor's initial tour. The findings include: On 10-13-2020 at 8:20 AM surveyor tour of the kitchen revealed the following: A. Dark substance on the tip of can opener blade. The gear of the can opener was soiled, dirty with evidence of food residue. B. There was evidence of dried, burnt food residue on the cooking stove. C. There was evidence of food debris and particles on the kitchen floor. Kitchen floor dirty and sticky when walking. D. The kitchen stove backs-plash was filled with food residue. E. Walls behind cook line was filled with food debris. F. The dish washing sink was leaking and spilling water. There was a pool of dirty water in the dish washing area. G. Observation of the walk-in freezer unit revealed ice condensation on the inside ceiling. In addition, an opened bag of frozen chicken was noted with the chicken exposed. There was no date to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$11,381 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

  • $11,381 — penalty dated 2025-07-01

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to AUTUMN LAKE HEALTHCARE — 59 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 4 of 52.8+1.2 vs chain
Health inspection 3 of 52.5+0.5 vs chain
Staffing 3 of 52.4+0.6 vs chain
Quality measures 5 of 54.3+0.7 vs chain
The other 58 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.8★, per CMS)
1 of 5Autumn Lake Healthcare At Crystal SpringsElkins, WV 1 of 5Autumn Lake Healthcare At Glen BurnieGlen Burnie, MD 1 of 5Autumn Lake Healthcare At HomewoodBaltimore, MD 1 of 5Autumn Lake Healthcare At Long GreenBaltimore, MD 1 of 5Autumn Lake Healthcare at GreenfieldMilwaukee, WI 1 of 5Nella's At Autumn Lake HealthcareElkins, WV 2 of 5Ashbrook Care & Rehabilitation CenterScotch Plains, NJ 2 of 5Autumn Lake Healthcare At Arlington WestBaltimore, MD 2 of 5Autumn Lake Healthcare At Ballenger CreekFrederick, MD 2 of 5Autumn Lake Healthcare At Baltimore WashingtonGlen Burnie, MD 2 of 5Autumn Lake Healthcare At BridgeparkBaltimore, MD 2 of 5Autumn Lake Healthcare At CatonsvilleCatonsville, MD 2 of 5Autumn Lake Healthcare At Glade ValleyWalkersville, MD 2 of 5Autumn Lake Healthcare At Loch RavenBaltimore, MD 2 of 5Autumn Lake Healthcare At MadisonMadison, CT 2 of 5Autumn Lake Healthcare At Memorial BridgePenns Grove, NJ 2 of 5Autumn Lake Healthcare At NorwalkNorwalk, CT 2 of 5Autumn Lake Healthcare At OverleaBaltimore, MD 2 of 5Autumn Lake Healthcare At PikesvillePikesville, MD 2 of 5Autumn Lake Healthcare At RuxtonTowson, MD 2 of 5Autumn Lake Healthcare At Salem CountySalem, NJ 2 of 5Autumn Lake Healthcare At SouthgateCarneys Point, NJ 2 of 5King David Nursing And Rehabilitation CenterBaltimore, MD 2 of 5The Subacute At Autumn Lake HealthcareVoorhees, NJ 3 of 5Autumn Lake Healthcare At Alice ManorBaltimore, MD 3 of 5Autumn Lake Healthcare At Calvert ManorRising Sun, MD 3 of 5Autumn Lake Healthcare At Chesapeake WoodsCambridge, MD 3 of 5Autumn Lake Healthcare At Chevy ChaseChevy Chase, MD 3 of 5Autumn Lake Healthcare At Patuxent RiverLaurel, MD 3 of 5Autumn Lake Healthcare At Perring ParkwayBaltimore, MD 3 of 5Autumn Lake Healthcare At RiverviewEssex, MD 3 of 5Autumn Lake Healthcare At Silver SpringSilver Spring, MD 3 of 5Autumn Lake Healthcare At Spa CreekAnnapolis, MD 3 of 5Autumn Lake Healthcare At Summit ParkCatonsville, MD 3 of 5Autumn Lake Healthcare At VinelandVineland, NJ 3 of 5Autumn Lake Healthcare At VoorheesVoorhees, NJ 3 of 5Autumn Lake Healthcare At West HartfordWest Hartford, CT 3 of 5Autumn Lake Healthcare Post-Acute Care CenterBaltimore, MD 3 of 5Autumn Lake Healthcare at BeloitBeloit, WI 3 of 5Autumn Lake Healthcare at OceanviewOcean View, NJ

Showing 40 of 58; lowest-rated first.

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleSince
3415 GREENCASTLE ROAD HOLDCO LLCOrganizationDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFsince 08/01/2022
AS FAMILY MD4 HOLDINGS LLCOrganizationINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFsince 08/01/2022
M MEISELS FAMILY HOLDINGS LLCOrganizationINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFsince 05/01/2021
3415 GREENCASTLE ROAD PROPCO LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER MORTGAGE INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFsince 08/01/2022
SCHWARTZ, MARKIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 08/01/2022
KYLER, BENJAMINIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/26/2024
SABAPATHI, RAMESHIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 10/01/2023
ACCURATE STAFFING LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 08/01/2022
BRAND SONNENSCHINE LLPOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 08/01/2022

CMS files one row per role, so the 16 rows in the source record cover these 9 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

6 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$19.0M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-3.0%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$4.4M
Related-party expense23% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 66%Medicare 15%Other / private 19%

This home reported $4.4M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 23% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$437per resident / day
operating cost
$13,292per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$424per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in MD

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Maryland Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Maryland
$12,927/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$14,448/mo
Nursing home (private)
$7,173/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 215315. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-04-07, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next