No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Autumn Lake Healthcare At Braddock Heights

6012 Jefferson Boulevard, Frederick, MD 21703 · For profit - Individual · 65 certified beds · (301) 371-7160 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (301) 371-7160 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse/neglect citation on record (F0600) — cited Aug 2024Resident-funds citation (F0565)
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • a strong health-inspection score (4/5) — the hardest rating to game (though it’s ranked within its own state, not nationally)
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
Worth asking about
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Aug 2024
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0607, F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • it has a citation for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0565)
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (40) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

4/5
CMS overall
4 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 4 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 3 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 4 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★ 3/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
1519 W Patrick St Ste A1 · (301) 228-9713 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
4317 Old National Pike · (301) 371-8145 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
2 Old Camp Rd · (301) 473-5385 · Call to confirm hours
Park
7110 Willowtree Dr S · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
5678 Holter Rd · (301) 371-8758

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 4 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 4 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 5 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 1 to 5 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating5★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased27.4%20.4%15.4%worse
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight9.9%5.4%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%0.5%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.5%1.5%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms15.2%22.8%6.5%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.0%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury2.7%2.4%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened20.2%22.2%16.1%worse
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication29.0%16.7%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%96.6%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers11.3%5.9%4.7%worse
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control25.8%25.0%21.2%worse
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table24.5%13.8%17.1%worse
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.7%1.1%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine91.0%80.6%79.4%better
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission16.1%21.0%22.6%better
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit9.1%9.8%12.0%better
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days0.431.331.67better
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days0.851.201.80better

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

50.5% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 147 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

50.5%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
9.8%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
73.6%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.35U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.19hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.16hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.01hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 73.6% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 53 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.35 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 60% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 2% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF50.5%CMS range 42.8–57.051.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF9.8%CMS range 6.5–13.910.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge73.6%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge34.0%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge64.2%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge90.9%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay1.4%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened5.6%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization7.8%CMS range 4.1–13.67.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.211.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.98
RN hours/ resident / day
0.72
LPN hours/ resident / day
1.62
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.31
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.77
RN hoursweekends
51.1%
Total nursing turnover
35.7%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 65 beds and averages 57.1 residents a day — about 88% occupied, or roughly 8 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.31 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.98 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.62 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.12 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.39 on weekdays — 8% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.06 to 0.77 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 51% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

17
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-01-23)
5
at the previous standard inspection (2024-08-16)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

40 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 30 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-23 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure residents' call devices were in reach. This was evident for 1 resident (Resident #39) of 24 residents screened during the initial pool portion of the recertification survey.The findings include:Resident #39 was admitted to the facility for care due to a degenerative neurological condition which caused them to be dependent on others for personal care. On 1/14/26 at 8:53 AM an observation and interview was conducted in Resident #39's room as part of the initial tour and screening during the recertification survey. The resident was seated upright in bed. They were awake, alert and easily engaged in conversation. The resident said that they were unable to reposition themselves without assistance. They expressed several concerns which included a delay in call bell response times. The surveyor did not see the resident's call device near the resident and asked the resident where it was. The resident said they did not know. The surveyor then observed the resident's call device on top of the nightstand…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-01-23 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, it was determined that the facility 1) failed to report an allegation of abuse timely, and 2) failed to report an allegation of abuse. This was evident for one facility reported incident (#351278) of 8 facility reported incidents (FRIs) reviewed during the recertification survey, and one resident (Resident #22) of three residents reviewed for grievances.The findings include:1) Resident #12 had an allegation of abuse in early 2025. A facility reported incident, with Incident351278 was filed related to the allegation. A review of the facility's investigation packet was conducted on 1/21/26 at 11:17 AM. The review revealed the initial report was sent to OHCQ on 3/17/25 at 2:13 PM. Included in the investigation packet was the statement of physical therapy assistant (Staff #20) that indicated Resident #12 reported the allegation of abuse to her on 3/17/25 at 10 AM. This was 4 hours and 13 minutes before the facility had reported the allegation The Nursing Home Administrator (NHA)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-23 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, it was determined that the facility failed to thoroughly investigate allegations of abuse. This was evident for 3 (#351276, #351281, and #2623047) of 8 facility reported incidents reviewed during the recertification survey.The findings include:1). On 1/14/26, during the entrance conference, the Nursing Home Administrator (NHA) was asked to provide the facility's investigation file for Incident #351276. The facility's abuse policy was also requested at that time. A review of the incident report which was received at the Office of Health Care Quality (OHCQ) on 2/23/25, revealed the following statement: resident alleged that staff member was rough when providing care. On 2/24/25, Resident [#40] told the 7a-7pm nurse that she was hit by the GNA [Geriatric Nursing Assistant] providing care to her on 7p-7a. On 1/21/26 at 3:06 PM an interview was conducted with the NHA to review the facility's process reportable incidents. The NHA said she was the abuse coordinator and responsible…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-01-23 · tag F0628 — isolated
    Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews and interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to communicate a resident's comprehensive care plan goals to the receiving healthcare institution to ensure safe and effective transition of care. This was evident for 1 (Resident #64) of 1 resident reviewed for hospitalization.The findings include:Record review on 1/16/26 at 11:06 AM for Resident #64 noted that s/he had resided in the facility since November 2025. The continued review included a nurse's note dated 12/21/25 indicating that Resident #64 had a change in condition and that the attending physician ordered Resident #64 transferred to the emergency room for evaluation and treatment.Further review included a change in condition/concurrent review form dated 12/21/25 for Resident #64. The form noted that the Resident's representative was not present at the time of transfer to the hospital. The form also had a check mark in a boxed area before each item to indicate which document was printed and sent with the Resident to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-01-23 · tag F0636 — isolated
    Assess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to complete comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments within the regulatory timeframes to facilitate appropriate care planning and maintain current, accurate assessment records. This was evident for 2 (Resident #43 and #52) of 3 residents reviewed for activities and 1 (Resident #55) of 4 residents reviewed for Resident assessment.The findings include:The MDS is a federally mandated assessment tool that nursing home staff use to gather information about each Resident's strengths and needs. The information collected informs resident care planning decisions. The admission MDS is a comprehensive assessment for new Residents and, under certain circumstances, returning Residents. It must be completed by the end of day 14, with the date of admission to the facility as day 1.The last day of the observation period is the Assessment Reference Date (ARD). It marks the end of the observation period and serves as a common…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-01-23 · tag F0638 — isolated
    Assure that each resident’s assessment is updated at least once every 3 months.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews and interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to complete Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments for residents within the required regulatory timeframes to facilitate appropriate care planning and maintain current assessment records. This was evident for 1 (Resident #7) of 3 residents reviewed for Resident assessments and for 1 (Resident #27) of 3 residents reviewed for Nutrition.The findings include:The Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment is a federally mandated tool used by nursing home staff to gather information about each resident's strengths and needs. The information collected informs residents' care planning decisions. The Quarterly assessment must be completed within 92 days of the MDS Completion Date of the last OBRA assessment. It must also be completed no later than 14 days after the ARD (ARD + 14 days).The last day of the observation period is the Assessment Reference Date (ARD). This date serves as a common reference point for all team members involved in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-01-23 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to accurately code residents' Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments correctly. This was evident for one (Resident #43) of one resident reviewed for communication and sensory, one (Resident #52) of 3 residents reviewed for Activities, and one (Resident #8), of 2 residents reviewed for dental care during the recertification survey.The findings include:The Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) delineates the process that long term care facilities follow to screen residents, assess resident strengths and needs, plan for resident care delivery, and evaluate the residents progress and needs on an ongoing basis by returning to additional, periodic screening, assessment and planning throughout a resident admission. The RAI process is the basis for the accurate assessment of each resident. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments are an integral part of the RAI and include completion of standardized assessment questions. There are…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-23 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, record reviews, and observations, it was determined that the facility failed to develop and implement comprehensive, resident-centered care plans. This was evident in 1 (Resident #43) of 1 resident reviewed for communication and sensory, and 1 (Resident #52) of 3 residents reviewed for ActivitiesThe findings include:The Minimum Data Set (MDS) is a federally mandated assessment tool used by nursing home staff to gather information about each resident's strengths and needs. The information collected drives resident care planning decisions. MDS assessments need to be accurate to ensure each resident receives the care they need.A care plan is a guide that addresses each Resident's unique needs. It is used to plan, assess, and evaluate the effectiveness of the Resident's care. Staff utilize care plans to provide resident-centered care that includes support, services, and resources to address residents' needs.1) During an interview with Resident #43 on 1/14/26 at 10:12 AM, s/he reported difficulty…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-23 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record reviews and interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to 1) revise care plans, and 2) conduct care plan meetings after the completion of the comprehensive and/or quarterly assessments. This was evident for two residents (Resident #5, #8) of 2 residents reviewed for dental care, and one resident (Resident #62) of 2 residents reviewed for care planning.The findings include: A care plan is a guide that addresses the unique needs of each resident. It is used to plan, assess, and evaluate the effectiveness of the resident's care. The Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) delineates the process that long term care facilities follow to screen residents, assess resident strengths and needs, plan for resident care delivery, and evaluate the residents progress and needs on an ongoing basis by returning to additional, periodic screening, assessment and planning throughout a resident admission. The RAI process is the basis for the accurate assessment of each resident. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments are an integral part of the RAI and include completion of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-01-23 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolated
    Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record reviews, and interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide an ongoing program of activities that met residents' needs and preferences. This was evident for 2 (Resident #43 and #52) out of 3 residents reviewed for activities.The findings include:The Minimum Data Set (MDS) is a federally mandated assessment tool used by nursing home staff to gather information on each resident's strengths and needs. Information collected drives resident care planning decisions. A care plan is a guide that addresses each resident's unique needs. It is used to plan, assess, and evaluate the effectiveness of the resident's care.1) During an initial tour of the Roosevelt Nursing Unit on 1/14/26 at 10:13 AM, Resident #43 was observed lying in bed, was not involved in any activity, and his/her television was turned off. A subsequent observation on 1/15/26 at 11:32 AM showed that Resident #43 was lying in bed with the television off, and no activity program was in progress. A review of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 30 citations
  • Potential for harm · D2026-01-23 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interviews and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to 1) effectively manage residents' pain, and 2) ensure pain management was provided to residents according to professional standards of practice. These was evident for 2 (Resident #43, #2) of 3 residents reviewed for pain management during the recertification survey.The findings include:1). A pain scale ranges from 0 to 10, with 0 indicating no pain and 10 representing the worst pain. It is used to assess the level of pain a patient is experiencing and to guide treatment. Non-pharmacological pain management is an intervention that does not involve medications. In an interview on 1/14/26 at 10:16 AM, Resident #43 reported back pain and said s/he received Tylenol for it, but it was not always helpful. In a subsequent interview on 1/15/26 at 11:45 AM, Resident #43's representative reported that the resident had constant back pain and had been taking Tylenol, which was ineffective at times. She added that she had just asked the staff for more medication before this interview. Record review for Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-01-23 · tag F0728 — failed to protect against nurse-aide misconduct — isolated
    Ensure that nurse aides who have worked more than 4 months, are trained and competent; and nurse aides who have worked less than 4 months are enrolled in appropriate training.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents were cared for by licensed Geriatric Nursing Assistants (GNAs). This was evident for 1 GNA (Staff #10) of 5 GNA licenses reviewed during the staffing investigation portion of the recertification survey.The findings include:On 1/20/26 at 9:53 AM a review of the facility's staff list was conducted. From that list, 5 Geriatric Nursing Assistants (GNAs) names were randomly selected to review for evidence of licensure, and the facility was asked to provide copies of their licenses.A review of the licenses revealed that Staff #10's GNA license was issued on 6/05/25, but the staff list indicated that he was hired on 8/07/24.On 1/22/26 at 3:43 PM an interview was conducted with the Director of Human Resources (Staff #17) to review that Staff #10's GNA license was effective 10 months after his hire date at the facility. She was asked to provide evidence of the employee's status changes such as hire date and position status changes, and evidence of hours worked 4 months past his hire…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-23 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure that resident medication storage areas and medical supplies were properly stored, free from expired items, and maintained in a sanitary and organized manner within 2 of 2 medication storage areas observed during the annual recertification survey. The findings include: On [DATE] at 12:30 PM, the surveyor observed the medication storage room on the Skyline unit. During the observation, the surveyor identified expired medical supplies stored in the medication storage area, including:(2) Medline suction/connection tubing, expired [DATE](1)Medline Gastrostomy Tube, 3-port, expired [DATE]On [DATE] at 12:55 PM, the surveyor reviewed the findings with Staff #3 and Staff #4 at the nurses' station on the Skyline unit.On [DATE] at 1:00 PM, the surveyor observed the medication storage room on the Roosevelt unit. Staff #5 provided access to the storage area. Upon entry, the surveyor observed that the counter space was cluttered, and the handwashing sink…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-01-23 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolated
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to store food in accordance with professional standards. This was evident in 1 of 2 observations of the facility's kitchen during the recertification survey.The findings include:An initial tour of the facility's kitchen with the dietary manager on 1/14/26 at 8:15 AM revealed the following:- An observation of leftover prepared pear fruit in a container with no label indicating the date it was prepared or the use-by date in the reach-in refrigerator.-An observation of boiled eggs labeled with a use-by date of 1/13/26 in the reach-in refrigerator. Staff indicated they should have been discarded.-An observation of leftover plates of cinnamon brown sugar blondie, labeled with a use-by date of 1/12/26, stored in the walk-in refrigerator. Staff indicated they should have been disposed of.A review of the facility's Food storage policy on 1/16/26 at 5:32 PM, stated that all foods will be stored wrapped, or in covered containers, labeled and dated, and arranged in a manner to prevent cross…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-01-23 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that staff accurately documented in a resident's medical record. This was evident in one (Resident #69) of three residents reviewed for infection control.The findings include:An initial observation was made on 1/14/26 at approximately 10:10 AM of Resident #69 seated on the resident's bed, speaking with staff #2, a social worker, who was also seated in a chair by the resident's bedside.During a subsequent observation on 1/14/26 at 11:24 AM, signage on Resident #69's door read, Special droplet/contact precautions in addition to standard precautions; only essential personnel should enter this room. The observation also noted a small cart of personal protective equipment (PPE) in front of Resident #69's room.Staff #11, a registered nurse, was interviewed on 1/14/26 at 11:24 AM and reported that Resident #69 had tested positive for COVID-19 on 1/12/26, prior to admission to the facility on 1/13/26. However, the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-23 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, record reviews, and interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure all staff donned appropriate personal protective equipment (PPE) for enhanced barrier precautions. This was evident for 1 (Resident #62) of 3 residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. The findings include:Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) - an infection control intervention designed to reduce transmission of multidrug-resistant organisms (MDROs) in nursing homes. Enhanced Barrier Precautions involve gown and glove use during high-contact resident care activities for residents known to be colonized or infected with a MDRO as well as those at increased risk of MDRO acquisition (e.g., residents with wounds or indwelling medical devices).Resident #62 had been residing in the facility since mid-2025. During an interview with the resident on 1/14/26 at 10:24 AM, s/he reported having a wound in the sacral area and indicated that staff would wear gloves and masks when providing his/her care but would often skip wearing the gowns.While still in the interview with Resident #62, a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-01-23 · tag F0914 — isolated
    Provide bedrooms that don't allow residents to see each other when privacy is needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations and interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure full visual privacy was provided to residents residing in semi-private rooms. This was evident for 1 (Resident #12) of 1 resident reviewed for privacy. The findings include:While Resident #12 was being interviewed on 1/15/26 at 9:10 AM, it was observed that the ceiling suspended curtain that moved around the resident's bed was not long enough to provide full visual privacy. Approximately 2 feet of opening was observed when the curtain was fully extended, in combination with the roommate's curtain. On 1/20/26 at 12:34 PM, the Director of Nursing (DON) was invited to inspect Resident #12's room with the surveyor. During the inspection, the DON confirmed that the ceiling suspended curtain left an approximate 2 feet opening when fully extended and stated, That's a privacy issue.On 1/23/26 at 10:46 AM, the concern with the ceiling suspended curtain not providing full visual privacy was discussed with the Nursing Home Administrator (NHA), Regional Director of Nursing (RDON), and the DON. The DON…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-08-16 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — pattern
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure four of six residents reviewed for abuse (Residents (R) 22, R11, R106 and R35) out of a total sample 29 were free from resident-to-resident abuse. This failure had the potential to cause physical injury or psychosocial distress for the four residents involved. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Abuse, Neglect and Exploitation dated 11/13/23 indicated, .It is the policy of this facility to provide protections for the health, welfare and rights of each resident by developing and implementing written policies and procedures that prohibit and prevent abuse, neglect, exploitation and misappropriation of resident property .'Abuse' means the willful inflection of injury, unreasonable confinement, intimidation, or punishment with resulting physical harm, pain or mental anguish, which can include staff to resident abuse and certain resident to resident altercations. 1. Review of R22's electronic…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-08-16 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on policy review, interviews, and review of Centers for Disease Control (CDC) and American Society of Heating, Refrigerating and Air-Conditioning Engineers (ASHRAE) guidelines, the facility's water management program was incomplete in that it was not consistent with current ASHRAE guideline, which specifically called for the design to evaluate the potential exposure of Legionnaire's disease (a serious pneumonia infection) within a healthcare facility. This failure created a potential for the 43 facility residents, who were over the age of 65, to be infected by Legionella Findings include: Review of the CDC website titled Legionella. Prevention and Control, dated 03/25/21, indicated, The key to preventing Legionnaires' disease is to reduce the risk of Legionella growth and spread. Building owners and managers can do this by maintaining building water systems and implementing controls for Legionella.Key Elements.Seven key elements of a Legionella water management program are to. Establish a water management…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-16 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and staff interview it was determined that the facility failed to investigate a grievance regarding care concerns for a resident. This was evident for 1 (#14) of 8 residents reviewed for complaints. The findings include: An observation on 8/12/24 at 1:35 PM revealed Resident #14 turned on his/her call light. When the call light came on there was 2 geriatric nursing assistants (GNA) sitting in the nurses' station that had a notification that the call light was on. There was 1 activity assistant (AA) in the common area (across the hallway from Resident #14's room) providing an activity to the residents. The 2 GNAs, later identified as GNA #2 and GNA #3 made no attempt to answer the call light. At 1:38 PM, AA #1 went to answer the resident's call light. She came out of the room and went to the nurses' station and addressed GNA #2 and GNA #3. The surveyor was unable to hear what AA #1 stated to them, but overheard GNA #3 state she had to complete documentation. AA #1 went back to the resident's room and went in, turned off the call light and came back out. An…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-16 · tag F0625 — isolated
    Notify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure two of two residents (Resident (R) 23 and R55) reviewed for hospital transfers in the sample of 29 was given a written copy of a bed hold notice prior to or within 24-hours of emergency transfer to the hospital. This failure created the potential for the residents and/or responsible parties to not have the information needed to safeguard their return to the facility. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Bed Hold Notice Upon Transfer, dated 12/27/22, revealed At the time of transfer for hospitalization or therapeutic leave, the facility will provide to the resident and/or the resident representative written notice which specifies the duration of the bed-hold policy and addresses information explaining the return of the resident to the next available bed .Information will specify the duration of the state bed-hold policy, if any, during which the resident is permitted to return and resume residence in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-16 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview it was determined facility staff failed to ensure that a resident who relied on staff for care needs had the care provided. This was evident for 2 (#14 and 902) of 8 residents reviewed for complaints. The finding include: A care plan is a guide that addresses the unique needs of each resident. It is used to plan, assess, and evaluate the effectiveness of the resident's care. The MDS (Minimum Data Set) is a complete assessment of the resident which provides the facility information necessary to develop a plan of care, provide the appropriate care and services to the resident, and to modify the care plan based on the resident's status. 1) A review of a compliant in 3/2023 for Resident #14 on 8/12/24 at 9:30 AM revealed a concern that the resident was not assigned an aide on night shift for 9/16/23 as care had not been provided. Review of a complaint in 10/23 revealed a concern with the resident receiving showers. On 8/12/24 at 11:47 AM a medical record Resident #14…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-16 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — isolated
    Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, document review, and manufacturer's instruction review, the facility failed to provide education for one of one Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN1) to possess the competencies and skill set necessary to ensure proper technique was used to administer insulin for one of two residents (Resident (R)52) that received insulin during medication administration. This failure had the potential to result in the resident receiving the wrong dose of insulin. Findings include: Review of R52's undated admission Record located in the electronic medical record (EMR) under the Profile tab, revealed R52 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis of type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM) with hyperglycemia. Review of R52's Physician Orders, dated 05/31/24, located in the EMR under the Orders tab, revealed an order for Insulin Lispro (1 [one] unit dial) subcutaneous solution pen-injector [short acting insulin] 100 Unit/Milliliter (ML). During an observation on 08/13/24 at 12:06 PM,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-16 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review, review of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) guidelines, and facility policy review, the facility failed to offer one of six residents (Resident (R) 37) and/or their representatives reviewed for immunizations, the opportunity for the resident to be vaccinated in accordance with nationally recognized standards out of a current facility census of 54. This practice had the potential to increase the risk for the residents to contract pneumonia. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Pneumococcal Vaccines dated 12/18/22 indicated .It is our policy to offer our residents . immunization against pneumococcal disease in accordance with current CDC guidelines and recommendations.For adults 65 years' or older who have not previously received any pneumococcal vaccine.Give 1 dose of PCV15 or PCV20.If PCV15 is used, this should be followed by a dose of PPSV23 at least one year later. The minimum interval is 8 weeks and can be considered in adults with an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-06-27 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation, it was determined that the facility staff failed to ensure that a call bell was within reach for every resident. This was evident for 2 (Residents #8, #47) residents observed during the initial tour of the facility. The findings include: A call bell is a bedside button tethered to the wall in the resident's room, which directs signals to the nursing station; a call light usually indicates that the patient has a need or perceived need requiring attention from the nurse or geriatric nursing assistant on duty. There is a call light for each resident in the room, for each bed. 1) During an observation on 06/24/19 at 8:05 AM, Resident #8 was noted to be seated in his/her bed and the Resident's pressure sensitive call bell was sitting on the table located to the side and behind the bed. 2) During an observation on 06/24/19 at 8:15 AM, Resident #47 was noted lying in his/her bed and the Resident's pressure sensitive call bell was sitting on the table located to the side of the bed and not within reach.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-06-27 · tag F0565 — failed to support the resident council — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to organize and participate in resident/family groups in the facility.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based upon record review, resident interview, and staff interview, it was determined that facility staff failed to put a system in place to ensure that resident's grievances regarding call bell response time and staff interaction with residents were addressed in a timely manner and outcomes communicated back to the resident. This was true for three out of 48 resident council members but had the potential to affect all residents in the facility. The findings include: On 6/25/19 at 12:17 PM, Record review for the month of March Resident Council meeting minutes revealed resident's concerns regarding call bells not being answered in a timely manner. Review of April's resident council meeting minutes failed to reveal that the concerns of call bells were addressed by the staff. Record review of Resident Council meeting minutes for the month of May revealed concerns of care and treatment of residents. The June resident council meeting minutes revealed that the facility's staff failed to address the previous month's concerns. In an interview on 6/25/19 at 1:08 PM with Activities Director,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-06-27 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility staff failed to discuss changes in the resident's medical status related to end stage condition with the Resident Representative (RR). This was evident in 1 (R#45) of 1 resident reviewed regarding advanced directives in the investigative portion of the survey. The findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #45, on [DATE] at 10:18 AM, revealed a Maryland order for life sustaining treatment (MOLST) completed on [DATE]. The MOLST developed for Resident #45 was for him/her to have full code status, should the resident require cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR). Further review of Resident #45's medical record revealed a physician visit on [DATE] and [DATE] certifying that any life sustaining treatment rendered for Resident #45 would be medically ineffective, including CPR. The facility social work designee was interviewed on [DATE] at 11:22 AM. The paperwork regarding Resident #45's code status and certifications were…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-06-27 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, observation, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility staff failed to 1. notify or include a Resident Representative (RR) in changes regarding residents' care and 2. to notify the physician, resident and/or their family and care staff of the unavailability of medications.This was evident for 2 (R#6 and #36) of 20 residents reviewed during the investigative portion of the survey. The findings include: 1. Interview with Representative of Resident #6 on 6/24/19 at 9:25 AM revealed a concern that, during a recent visit with Resident #6, s/he noted that the chair alarm that was ordered for Resident #6 was no longer in place. When the representative inquired with staff where it was, s/he was told that the 'state said they could not have them anymore.' The representative was very upset regarding the change as s/he is here to visit Resident #6 everyday all day and this change was not discussed with him/her prior to it occurring. The Administrator was interviewed on 6/26/19 at 10:31 AM regarding the Representative's concerns. She stated the alarms were…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-06-27 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolated
    Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of a facility reported incident and staff interview, it was determined that the facility staff failed to protect a cognitively impaired resident's right to privacy. This was evident for 1 (R #98) of 20 residents reviewed during an annual recertification survey. The findings include: Review of facility reported incident MD00129799 on 06/24/19 revealed an allegation that GNA #5 took a cell phone picture of Resident #98 on 08/06/18, and then posted the picture to a social media site. In an interview on 06/24/19 at 2:25 PM, GNA #4 stated that s/he observed a picture, that was posted by GNA #5 to a social media site, of Resident #98 seated in his/her wheelchair while in the facility. GNA #4 stated s/he witnessed the picture within 24 hours of being posted to the social media site. GNA #4 stated s/he brought this information the facility administration. In an interview on 06/25/19 at 8:17 AM, the former administrator stated s/he recalled the incident and that there was no nudity involved in the posted…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-06-27 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of Facility Reported Incident MD00 1390223, investigation review, and interview with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to follow policy on completing background employee checks of potential new employees. This was evident in 1 of 2 employees records reviewed. The findings include; On 6/27/19, a facility reported incident involving a geriatric nursing assistant (GNA staff # 20) and a resident was reviewed. This review revealed an allegation of abuse. Further review of the investigation revealed that the facility, per abuse policy and procedure, immediately reported to the Director of Nursing (DON) and the administrator, who then reported it to the state agency the allegation of abuse. Review of staff # 20's employee file failed to reveal a prior employment reference check. During an nterview with the facility Administrator, on 6/27/19, the surveyor requested a copy of the prior employee reference. The administrator acknowledged that it was not done. Review of the abuse prevention policy and procedure revealed the following: Pre-Employment Screening-…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-06-27 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of the medical record, facility investigations and interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to complete a thorough investigations of abuse allegations related to injury of unknown origins. This was found to be evident for one out of the seven facility reported incidents (FRI) reviewed during the investigative portion of the survey (R#149). The findings include: During the review of the FRI on 6/26/19, it was noted in the facility report that Resident #149 was found with an injury of unknown origin. Further review of the FRI revealed that Resident #149 had increased complaints of pain and an x-ray was completed. The results of the x-ray showed a fracture requiring intervention. Further review of the facility investigation failed to reveal any interviews with any staff or attempts to determine when this injury could have occurred. The FRI included the nursing notes for 72 hours around the time that Resident #149's complaints of pain started, the x-ray, and an updated care plan. The facility DON and Chief Nursing Officer were interviewed on 6/26/19 at 2:10…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-06-27 · tag F0655 — isolated
    Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and staff interview, it was determined the facility staff failed to provide the resident/resident representative with a copy within 48 hours of admission to the facility. This was evident for 1 (Residents #36) of 20 residents reviewed during an annual recertification survey. The findings include: A care plan is a guide that addresses the unique needs of each resident. It is used to plan, assess and evaluate the effectiveness of the resident's care. Review of Resident #36's medical record on 6/25/19 revealed that Resident #36 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of the medical record failed to reveal documentation that a baseline care plan was provided to the resident/resident representative at that time. In an interview on 6/25/19 at 2:14 PM, the facility social service designee stated that s/he was not able to locate any documentation that Resident #36 or Resident #36's representative was provided with a copy of the base line care plan within 48 hours after his/her…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-06-27 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review, and interview with facility staff, it was determined that the facility failed to develop a person-centered comprehensive care plan to as evidenced by the facility's failure to develop a care plan to address a resident's chronic diagnosis and long-term use of antibiotics. This was found to be evident for 1 out of 20 residents (Resident #23) reviewed during the investigative stage of the survey. The findings include: A care plan is a guide that addresses the unique needs of each resident. It is used to plan, assess and evaluate the effectiveness of the resident's care. On 6/27/19, Resident # 23 medical records and care plans were reviewed. This review revealed that the resident had a diagnosis of chronic urinary tract infection (UTI) and was taking Bactrim DS (double strength) for chronic UTI's. Review of the care plans failed to reveal a care plan for Chronic UTI and the prophylactic use of an antibiotic. During an interview with the Director of Nursing on 6/27/19, the surveyor requested the resident care plans for chronic UTI and antibiotic use. The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-06-27 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review and interview, it was determined the facility staff failed to revise Resident #27's oxygen care plan regarding weaning Resident #27 from the use of continuous oxygen. This was evident for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for oxygen use. The findings include: A care plan is a guide that addresses the unique needs of each resident. It is used to plan, assess, and evaluate the effectiveness of the resident's care. Review of Resident #27 medical record on 6/27/19 revealed a physician's order, dated 6/18/19, instructing the nursing staff to administer 2 liters of oxygen by nasal cannula to Resident #27 and to wean Resident #27 off of oxygen as tolerated. Review of Resident #27's care plan failed to reveal a revision for oxygen use and the process of how the nursing staff were going to wean Resident #27 off of oxygen. In an interview on 6/27/19 at 9:35 AM, Nurse #18 stated that Resident #27 does need oxygen at present and that the nursing staff were checking Resident #27's oxygen saturations. A review of the care plan failed to reveal the new nursing interventions…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-06-27 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, medical record review and interview with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents receive treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice and the comprehensive person-centered care plan, as evidenced by failure to ensure a follow up urology consult to determine if the continued use of an antibiotic was necessary. This was evident for 1 of 20 (R#23) residents reviewed during the investigative stage of the long-term care survey process. The findings include: On 6/27/19, Resident # 23's medical records were reviewed. This review revealed that the resident was admitted to the facility in March 2016 with diagnoses and symptoms which included, Overactive Bladder (a sudden, uncontrolled need or urge to urinate) high blood pressure, and diabetes. During a review of the medical records on 6/27/19, a urologist consult was completed for R# 23 in February 2017 which revealed the following: Start Bactrim DS (double strength) every 12 hours dispense 20 (for 10 days) and after that, Bactrim SS (single strength) 1…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-06-27 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of medical records and interview with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to have an effective system in place to ensure that pharmacist recommendations (resulting from identified irregularities during the monthly pharmacy review were addressed and acted upon by the physician. This was found to be evident for 1 out of the 5 residents (Resident #23) sampled for medication regimen review during the investigative stage of the survey. The findings include: On 6/27/19, Resident # 23's medical records were reviewed. This review revealed that, on 3/14/19, a pharmacist completed the required monthly medication review. The review found irregularities with the resident medication and recommendations were made. The March pharmacy recommendation revealed the following documentation, 'The resident is currently receiving Bactrim prophylactically and is normally subjected to a stop date. Please provide a stop date/therapeutic endpoint or taper to D/C (discontinue) if reasonable or document contradiction to D/C based on prior failure and subsequent recurrence'. On…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-06-27 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medication administration observation and staff interview, it was determined that the facility staff failed to ensure a medication administration error rate of less than 5 percent. This was evident for 3 errors involving Residents # 36 and #47 out of 30 opportunities for error observed on the Skyline Unit resulting in a medication administration error rate of 10%. The findings include: On 06/27/19 from 7:20 AM to 9:15 AM, a medication administration observation was conducted on the Skyline unit with Certified Medication Administer (CMA) staff #14). At 8:40 AM, the CMA completed the administration of Resident #36 medications. Upon review of the electronic administration log, surveyor noted that one of the medications, a probiotic was selected not administered by the CMA. Interview with the CMA revealed that she administered the last available dose of the medication to the resident on the morning of 6/26/19. She added that, although she notified the resident's nurse (staff #17) and electronically requested a refill, she did not know that the medication was not available this…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-06-27 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    DELETE - KS TO IMPORT Based on observation, record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility staff failed to put a system in place to; ensure all drugs and biologicals in the facility are labeled according to professional standards, keep consistent temperature logs for medication and biological storage, and keep an accurate inventory log for controlled substances. This was true for 2 of 3 medication carts and 2 of 2 storage rooms reviewed during the survey. Findings include: An observation was conducted on the Skyline unit medication storage room on 06/27/19 at 11:13 AM. Charge Nurse (Staff #16) was present. Review of the January through June 2019 Refrigerator Temperature Logs revealed that for the months of May and June, there were several missing temperature entries. Observation of the refrigerator found one undated and unlabeled multi-use vial of insulin. In addition there was ice noted on the inside walls of the freezer compartment. Interview with the charge nurse revealed that it was her expectation that the night shift nurse would measure and document…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-06-27 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and staff interview, it was determined that the facility staff failed to apply standard infection control practices while administering medications to residents. This was true for 2 (Residents # 10 and #36) of 3 residents reviewed during a medication administration observation on the Skyline unit. However, this deficient practice has the potential to affect all residents, visitors, and staff in the facility. Findings include: On 06/27/19 from 7:20 AM to 9:15 AM, a medication administration observation was conducted on the Skyline unit with Certified Medication Administer (CMA) staff #14. At 07:35 AM, the CMA entered the room of Resident #10 to administer medications. At the bedside table, she repositioned the resident's personal items to one side, placed the resident's medications which included a cup of 6 pills, a box with a bottle of eye drops and another that held a bottle nasal spray in the emptied space without application of a disinfectant or provision of a protective barrier. The resident refused the receipt of the medications, but agreed to have the CMA…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-06-27 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and staff interview, it was determined the facility staff failed to take steps to offer a resident the pneumococcal and flu vaccine after admission. This was evident for 1 (Residents #47) of 5 residents reviewed for immunizations during an annual recertification survey. The findings include: A vaccination is the act of introducing a vaccine into the body to produce immunity to a specific disease. Immunization is a process by which a person becomes protected against a disease through vaccination. Review of Resident #47's medical record on 6/25/19 revealed that Resident #47 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Further review of Resident #47's medical record failed to reveal documentation that the facility staff offered the pneumococcal and flu vaccine after admission. In an interview on 6/27/19 at 8:40 AM, the infection control practitioner stated that s/he was also unable to locate any documentation in Resident #47's medical record that indicated the facility staff offered the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to AUTUMN LAKE HEALTHCARE — 59 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 4 of 52.8+1.2 vs chain
Health inspection 4 of 52.5+1.5 vs chain
Staffing 3 of 52.4+0.6 vs chain
Quality measures 4 of 54.3-0.3 vs chain
The other 58 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.8★, per CMS)
1 of 5Autumn Lake Healthcare At Crystal SpringsElkins, WV 1 of 5Autumn Lake Healthcare At Glen BurnieGlen Burnie, MD 1 of 5Autumn Lake Healthcare At HomewoodBaltimore, MD 1 of 5Autumn Lake Healthcare At Long GreenBaltimore, MD 1 of 5Autumn Lake Healthcare at GreenfieldMilwaukee, WI 1 of 5Nella's At Autumn Lake HealthcareElkins, WV 2 of 5Ashbrook Care & Rehabilitation CenterScotch Plains, NJ 2 of 5Autumn Lake Healthcare At Arlington WestBaltimore, MD 2 of 5Autumn Lake Healthcare At Ballenger CreekFrederick, MD 2 of 5Autumn Lake Healthcare At Baltimore WashingtonGlen Burnie, MD 2 of 5Autumn Lake Healthcare At BridgeparkBaltimore, MD 2 of 5Autumn Lake Healthcare At CatonsvilleCatonsville, MD 2 of 5Autumn Lake Healthcare At Glade ValleyWalkersville, MD 2 of 5Autumn Lake Healthcare At Loch RavenBaltimore, MD 2 of 5Autumn Lake Healthcare At MadisonMadison, CT 2 of 5Autumn Lake Healthcare At Memorial BridgePenns Grove, NJ 2 of 5Autumn Lake Healthcare At NorwalkNorwalk, CT 2 of 5Autumn Lake Healthcare At OverleaBaltimore, MD 2 of 5Autumn Lake Healthcare At PikesvillePikesville, MD 2 of 5Autumn Lake Healthcare At RuxtonTowson, MD 2 of 5Autumn Lake Healthcare At Salem CountySalem, NJ 2 of 5Autumn Lake Healthcare At SouthgateCarneys Point, NJ 2 of 5King David Nursing And Rehabilitation CenterBaltimore, MD 2 of 5The Subacute At Autumn Lake HealthcareVoorhees, NJ 3 of 5Autumn Lake Healthcare At Alice ManorBaltimore, MD 3 of 5Autumn Lake Healthcare At Calvert ManorRising Sun, MD 3 of 5Autumn Lake Healthcare At Chesapeake WoodsCambridge, MD 3 of 5Autumn Lake Healthcare At Chevy ChaseChevy Chase, MD 3 of 5Autumn Lake Healthcare At Patuxent RiverLaurel, MD 3 of 5Autumn Lake Healthcare At Perring ParkwayBaltimore, MD 3 of 5Autumn Lake Healthcare At RiverviewEssex, MD 3 of 5Autumn Lake Healthcare At Silver SpringSilver Spring, MD 3 of 5Autumn Lake Healthcare At Spa CreekAnnapolis, MD 3 of 5Autumn Lake Healthcare At Summit ParkCatonsville, MD 3 of 5Autumn Lake Healthcare At VinelandVineland, NJ 3 of 5Autumn Lake Healthcare At VoorheesVoorhees, NJ 3 of 5Autumn Lake Healthcare At West HartfordWest Hartford, CT 3 of 5Autumn Lake Healthcare Post-Acute Care CenterBaltimore, MD 3 of 5Autumn Lake Healthcare at BeloitBeloit, WI 3 of 5Autumn Lake Healthcare at OceanviewOcean View, NJ

Showing 40 of 58; lowest-rated first.

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
6012 JEFFERSON BOULEVARD HOLDCO LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 01/01/2023
AS FAMILY VB HOLDINGS LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 01/01/2023
M MEISELS FAMILY HOLDINGS LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 01/01/2023
SCHWARTZ, MARKIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 01/01/2023
MCLAURIN, LISAIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2023
WAH, JOHNIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 05/01/2021
STERN, ARYEHIndividualINDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNFsince 04/23/2025
STERN, ROCHELIndividualINDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNFsince 04/23/2025
ACCURATE STAFFING LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2023
BRAND SONNENSCHINE LLPOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2023
R MEISELS FAMILY TRUSTOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2023

CMS files one row per role, so the 17 rows in the source record cover these 11 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

6 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$7.1M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-3.8%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$981K
Related-party expense13% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 57%Medicare 24%Other / private 19%

This home reported $981K paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 13% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$419per resident / day
operating cost
$12,740per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$404per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in MD

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Maryland Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Maryland
$12,927/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$14,448/mo
Nursing home (private)
$7,173/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 215199. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-01-23, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next