Doctors Community Rehabilitation And Patient Care
6710 Mallery Drive, Lanham, MD 20706 · For profit - Partnership · 130 certified beds · (301) 552-2000 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- a middle-of-the-pack inspection score (3/5)
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Aug 2025
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- it has 1 actual-harm citation
- a high number of inspection citations overall (48) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $16,331 in federal fines (most recent 2024-04-30)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 3 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 3 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 4 of 5 |
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 4 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 4 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 5 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 2 to 4 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 26.0% | 20.4% | 15.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 10.0% | 5.4% | 5.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.6% | 0.5% | 0.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 1.9% | 1.5% | 2.0% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 6.9% | 22.8% | 6.5% | typical |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 1.2% | 2.4% | 3.3% | better |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 27.7% | 22.2% | 16.1% | worse |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 3.2% | 16.7% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 91.0% | 96.6% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 7.6% | 5.9% | 4.7% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 23.5% | 25.0% | 21.2% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 5.3% | 13.8% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 1.0% | 1.1% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 60.3% | 80.6% | 79.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 17.6% | 21.0% | 22.6% | better |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 9.5% | 9.8% | 12.0% | better |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 0.80 | 1.33 | 1.67 | better |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 1.06 | 1.20 | 1.80 | better |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
65.0% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 591 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 51.3% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 228 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.44 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 75% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 19% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 65.0%CMS range 61.3–68.5 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | better than U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 15.7%CMS range 12.9–18.5 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | worse than U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 51.3% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 54.4% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 47.8% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 99.7% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 98.8% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | 98.5% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.3% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 5.7% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 7.2%CMS range 5.3–8.9 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.05 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 130 beds and averages 126.1 residents a day — about 97% occupied, or roughly 4 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.81 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.80 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.92 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.39 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.98 on weekdays — 15% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.91 to 0.53 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 38% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
48 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 37 are one tap away and print in full.
- Actual harm · G2024-04-30 · tag F0710 — isolatedObtain a doctor's order to admit a resident and ensure the resident is under a doctor's care.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to clarify a medication discrepancy on the hospital discharge summary, monitor appropriate dosing of a medication by ordering the correct laboratory testing, and take action on abnormal laboratory results required for accurate medication dosing. This was found to be evident for 1 (#43) out of 6 residents reviewed for Vancomycin administration. This deficient practice resulted in harm to the resident. The findings include: Bacteremia is the presence of bacteria in the blood. Vancomycin is an antibiotic used to treat serious bacterial infections. Proper administration requires blood levels be monitored for accurate dosing. According to the National Institute of Health (NIH), the Vancomycin serum trough levels (the low point) are recommended for monitoring and concentrations are recommended in the range of 15 to 20 micrograms in one milliliter (mcg/mL). The reference level for Vancomycin peak levels (the high point) is 20 to 40 mcg/mL. There is no reference level for random (a level not timed with dosing)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-16 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review and staff interview, it was determined the facility staff failed to ensure Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments were accurately coded. This was evident for 1 (Resident #18) of 5 residents reviewed for a fall during a complaint survey.The findings include: The MDS is part of the Resident Assessment Instrument that was Federally mandated in legislation passed in 1986. The MDS is a set of assessment screening items employed as part of a standardized, reproducible, and comprehensive assessment process that ensures each resident's individual needs are identified, that care is planned based on those individualized needs, and that the care is provided as planned to meet the needs of each resident. On 4/15/26 at 7:10 AM a review of Resident #18's medical record was conducted and revealed Resident #18 had a fall on 1/18/26 at 13:45 (1:45 PM). Resident #18 sustained a hematoma and was sent to the emergency room for evaluation.Review of Resident #18's quarterly MDS with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 4/2/26, Section J, falls, failed to capture the fall of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-16 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and interview, the facility failed to follow standard of practice during the care of the resident. This was evident for 1 (Resident #31) out of 3 residents reviewed for activation of emergency services during a complaint survey.The findings include: MOLST (Medical Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment) is a portable and enduring medical order form covering options for cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) and other life-sustaining treatments. The medical orders are based on a resident and/or health care agent's directions about medical treatments. Review of Resident #31's medical record on [DATE] revealed the Resident was admitted to the facility in 2023. Further review of Resident #31's medical record revealed a MOLST dated [DATE] that stated the Resident was an Attempt CPR. Review of Nursing Supervisor #10's nurse's note for Resident #31 on [DATE] at 6:37 AM stated: 1 AM- The nurse on duty notified the nursing supervisor of the resident has become unresponsive and has no palpable…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-16 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review and interview, the facility staff failed to administer and hold medications as ordered by the physician . This was evident for 3 (Resident #31, #24 and #20) of 36 residents reviewed during a complaint survey.The findings Include: 1.The facility staff failed to administer a medication as ordered by the physician to Resident #31. Review of Resident #31's medical record on 4/9/26 revealed the Resident was admitted to the facility in 2023 with a diagnosis to include heart failure. Further review of the Resident's medical record revealed the was sent to the emergency room on 2/27/26 for abnormal labs. On 2/28/26 the Resident was followed up by Nurse Practitioner (NP) #24 who ordered to increase the Resident's Lasix from 20 mg to 40 mg daily for 7 days. Lasix is a medication used to treat fluid retention that can be caused by heart failure. Review of Resident #31's February and March 2026 Medication Administration Records revealed the Resident was administered Lasix 40 mg for 7 days through 3/6/26 but the facility staff failed to resume Resident's Lasix 20…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-15 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record reviews and interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to code the resident's status accurately on the Minimum Data Set assessment (MDS). This was evident for 1 (Resident #8) out of 2 residents reviewed for accuracy of assessments during the annual survey. The findings include: The MDS is a federally mandated assessment tool that helps nursing home staff members gather information on each resident's strengths and needs. Information collected drives resident care planning decisions. MDS assessments need to be accurate to ensure each resident receives the care they need. On 12/04/2025 at 8:16 AM A review of Resident #8's medical records was conducted. The review revealed that Resident #8 was admitted into the facility on 4/13/2009, however, a medical diagnosis of Schizophrenia was created on 9/6/2023. On 12/05/2025 at 10:09 AM Further review of the resident's MDS was conducted. MDS assessment completed on 5/29/25, under section I, Active Diagnosis, the resident was not coded for schizophrenia, however, the MDS completed on 8/28/25 revealed that the resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-15 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interviews and record reviews, it was determined that the facility failed to update a resident's care plan to reflect individualized preferences. This was evident for 1 (Resident #6) out of 7 residents reviewed for care plan development during the annual survey.The findings include:On 12/03/2025 at 9:38 AM An interview with Resident #6's Representative was conducted. They reported that they have communicated to the facility that they preferred only female providers to care for Resident #6. However, there was a day in which the Resident Representative found a male staff caring for the resident. On 12/10/2025 at 10:10 AM A review of Resident #6's medical record was conducted. The review failed to show any documentation of the resident's female preference for provision of care. On 12/10/2025 at 10:14 AM An interview with Staff #6 was conducted. When asked if she was aware of Resident #6's preference, she said yes, that the resident preferred only female Geriatric Nursing Assistants (GNAs) to care for them. She also added that the preferences are documented on the care plan. On…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-15 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record reviews and interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to administer medications in a timely manner. This was evident for 1 (Resident #128) out of 1 residents reviewed for medication administration during the complaint survey. The findings include: On 12/10/2025 at 1:00 PM A review of the complaint # 2624858 submitted to the Office of Health Care Quality (OHCQ) was conducted. The review alleged that Resident #128 was not given their morning medications on 6/13/2025. On 12/10/2025 at 1:25 PM An interview with the complainant was conducted. The complainant stated that Resident #128 reported that they were not given medications and vital signs were never obtained on 6/13/2025. On 12/11/2025 at 9:14 AM A review of Resident #128's medical record was conducted. The review revealed a Situation, Background, Assessment Recommendation (SBAR) note dated 6/13/2025, that reported the resident was never given morning medications. A review of June 2025 Medication Administration Record (MAR) failed to show that medications were administered the morning of June 13th,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-12-15 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure Resident #45 was free from a significant medication error. This was evident for 1 (Resident #45) of 1 resident reviewed during the annual survey. The findings include: On 12/10/2025 at 9:41 AM, Complaint #2604899 was reviewed which revealed a concern that Resident #45 was receiving double doses of their thyroid medication, Synthroid, which had resulted in an abnormal lab value. Synthroid, also known as levothyroxine, is a prescription, man-made thyroid hormone medication used to treat an underactive thyroid gland condition called hypothyroidism. On 12/10/2025 at 9:58 AM, a review of the resident's medical records revealed a change in condition progress note that read, On 8/18/ 2025 resident endocrinologist communicate via fax to start resident on Synthroid 150 mcg to be given in the am, assigned nurse verified the new order with NP (Nurse Practitioner) in house verbally NP approved Synthroid 150 assigned nurse on duty transcribe synthroid 150 mcg to the Mar but did not discontinue the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-15 · tag F0791 — failed to provide routine dental services — isolatedProvide or obtain dental services for each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews and record reviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide dental health evaluation and services to the residents. This was evident for 2 (Resident #15 and #10) out of 4 residents evaluated for dental health. The findings include: 1.) On 12/03/2025 at 8:28 AM An observation and interview were conducted. Resident #15 was observed with missing teeth on the bottom of the mouth. When asked if they had dentures, Resident #15 stated that they had the top plate, but the bottom plate was lost. On 12/08/2025 at 12:33 PM A review of Resident #15's medical record was conducted. The review revealed that the resident had an oral health evaluation completed on 6/9/23 that indicated the resident had lower dentures. On 12/08/2025 at 12:40 PM An interview with Staff #13 was conducted. She reported that she had never seen Resident #15 with dentures. On 12/08/2025 at 1:56 PM An interview with the Director of Nursing (DON) was conducted. She reported that Resident #15 had upper dentures only and that the facility's dentures documentation was inaccurate,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-12-15 · tag F0825 — isolatedProvide or get specialized rehabilitative services as required for a resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide rehabilitative services as ordered. This was evident for 1 (Resident #129) out of 1 resident reviewed for therapy services. The findings include: On 12/09/2025 at 10:00 AM, a review of Complaint #2604787 was completed. The complainant alleged that Resident #129 was not receiving his therapy as ordered. On 12/09/2025 at 10:28 AM, the rehab documentation for the months of July and June of 2025 for Resident #129 was reviewed. Physical Therapy (PT) saw the resident, 7 times in the month of July (7/24, 7/20, 7/16, 7/14, 7/10, 7/9, 7/3) and 8 times in the month of June (6/30, 6/28, 6/24, 6/22, 6/16, 6/15, 6/14). Resident #129 had a total of 15 sessions. Resident #129's order resident should have had PT sessions 5 times per week for 4 weeks this would be a total of 20 sessions for all 4 weeks. On 12/10/2025 at 9:13 AM, an interview with the Director of Rehab (Staff #9) was conducted. When asked why Resident #129 missed 5 sessions of PT, Staff #9 stated that she believed the resident's order…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-12-15 · tag F0840 — isolatedEmploy or obtain outside professional resources to provide services in the nursing home when the facility does not employ a qualified professional to furnish a required service.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interviews and medical record review, it was determined the facility failed to follow up with neurologist consultation recommendations which resulted in a delay of care for the resident. This was evident for 1 (Resident #109) of 1 resident reviewed for use of outside sources during the survey. The findings include: On 12/03/2025 at 10:14 AM, during an interview with Resident #109, they stated that they were having a concern with a vibration feeling in their left ear. They stated that they were seeing a neurologist, but had not been seen for about eight months. On 12/08/2025 at 10:33 AM, a review of a neurologist consult from 5/13/25 revealed recommendations for the resident to obtain an electroencephalogram (EEG), the EEG results report to be faxed when it is completed, and that there would be a follow up appointment after reviewing the results. An EEG (electroencephalogram) is a painless, non-invasive test that records your brain's electrical activity using sensors (electrodes) placed on your scalp, showing brain waves as wavy lines to help diagnose conditions like…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 37 citations
- Potential for harm · D2025-12-15 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, observations, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to follow appropriate infection control practices. This was evident for 2 (Resident #4 and #6) out of 33 residents reviewed during the recertification survey.The findings include:Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP), are infection control guidelines for nursing homes, recommended by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, to stop the spread of dangerous antibiotic-resistant germs by requiring gowns and gloves only for high-contact care (bathing, dressing, wound care, device care) for residents with wounds, devices, or known multi-drug-resistant organisms. 1) On 12/09/2025 at 11:21 AM A review of Resident #6's medical records was conducted. The review revealed that the resident had a pressure ulcer on the sacrum that required daily dressing change. There was an order that indicated EBP should be followed during wound care. On 12/09/2025 at 11:33 AM An observation of Resident #6's wound care was conducted. Assisting with the wound care procedure was Staff #7 (Wound Team Lead)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-15 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — isolatedMake sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews, and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain an effective pest control program so that the facility is free of pests. This was evident in the kitchen during the initial kitchen tour. The findings include: On 12/03/2025 at 8:43 AM, an observation was made during the initial kitchen tour. A small brown insect was observed crawling on kitchen wall by hand wash sink near the walk-in Refrigerators. On 12/03/2025 at 9:11 AM, a surveyor conducted an interview with Resident #6's representative. They reported that they had observed roaches in the resident's room. On 12/04/2025 at 12:05 PM, an interview was conducted with the Maintenance director (Staff #1). When asked if the facility had any issues with pest control, Staff #1 stated that any issues will be reported directly to the pest control company and the facility keeps copies of their reports. This surveyor made Staff #1 aware of the surveyor's insect sighting in the kitchen.
- Potential for harm · D2025-08-28 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interviews, and observations, the facility failed to maintain an environment free from staff-to-resident verbal and non-verbal abuse for 2 (Resident #28, #3) of 19 residents. Specifically, 1) Housekeeper 1 (HK1) used curse words toward and made a threatening gesture toward Resident (R) 28 by raising his/her middle finger one time within R28's bedroom and when 2) General Nursing Assistant (GNA) verbally abused R3 and used derogatory comments while providing care. The facility census was 126. The facility implemented effective and thorough corrective measures following these incidents and prior to the start of this survey. The facilities plan and action were verified during this survey, therefore this deficiency was found to be past noncompliance with a compliance date of 1) 8/1/24 and 2) 5/10/25.The findings include: 1) A review of the facility's Center Operations Policies and Procedures Manual including a policy titled, “OPS300 Abuse Prohibition,” dated 7/1/13 with a revision dated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-04-30 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — patternKeep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on surveyor observation, medical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain confidentiality of resident medical records as evidenced by accessibility of a laboratory log. This was found to be evident for 7 (Residents #3, 16, 42, 51, 55, 71 and 77) out 7 Residents reviewed for confidentiality of medical records. The findings include: On the initial tour of the nursing unit 400 conducted on 4/15/24 at 8:38 AM the surveyors observed a black binder that sat on the countertop at the nursing station. The review of the black binder revealed a laboratory log that included Residents #3, #16, #42, #51, #55, #71, and #77 names and laboratory information. The laboratory log included the following documents for April 1, 2024 through April 15, 2024: resident lab test log divided by dates, list of residents who were scheduled for a specific lab by dates, Clinical Laboratory Outpatient Requisition forms that were attached for each resident that had a lab scheduled, and the lab and diagnostic record from Point Click Care (PCC) (a computer software…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-04-30 · tag F0623 — patternProvide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, and interviews, it was determined the facility failed to notify the Ombudsman of residents that transferred or discharged . This was found evident of 3 (Resident #17, #90 & 73) of 5 residents reviewed for hospitalization during the survey. The finding include: 1a) On 4/15/24 at 11:56 AM, the surveyor interviewed Resident #17. During this interview Resident #17 stated he/she had recently been hospitalized . On 4/19/24 at 7:47 AM, the surveyor reviewed Resident #17's medical record. The review revealed that Resident # 17 was transferred to the hospital on 3/15/24. On 4/19/24 at 11:33 AM, the surveyor requested documentation that the Ombudsman was notified of Resident #17's March hospitalization. The Director of Nursing (DON) stated she would look for the documentation. On 4/19/24 at 2:13 PM, the DON stated she was not able to find any documentation that the Ombudsman was notified, and she believed the communication was not done after speaking with the Social Worker and business office. 1b)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-04-30 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — patternDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and medical record review it was determined that the facility failed to: 1) revise residents care plans and 2) to hold care plan meetings with an interdisciplinary team for residents at the time of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment. This was found evident for in 3 (Resident # 42, #75 and #80) and 1 (Resident #322) of 10 residents reviewed for care planning. The findings include: Care plans are developed for residents to guide the care that residents receive in the facility. They are required to be developed within 7 days of completion of a resident's admission comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment and revised at least every quarter (or more often as needed). The facility is required to have care plans developed and revised by an interdisciplinary team. A wound vac is a negative pressure wound therapy device that decreases air pressure on the wound and helps wounds heal more quickly. The Minimum Data Set is part of the federally mandated process for clinical…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-04-30 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — patternProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, review of resident's medical records, and interviews, it was determined that the facility staff failed to provide activities of daily living care in accordance with the Resident's care plan for dependent Residents. This was found to be evident for 5 (Resident #322, #97, #321, #41 and #80) out of 7 reviewed during the survey for activities of daily living. The findings include: Activities of Daily Living (ADLs) is a term used collectively to describe fundamental skills required to independently care for oneself, such as eating, bathing, and mobility. A care plan is a federally mandated tool that is based on a resident's assessment and describes the services that the facility will provide to the resident to attain or maintain the resident's physical, mental, and psychosocial health. The care plan must be developed and revised after each assessment. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) is part of the federally mandated process for clinical assessment of all residents in Medicare and Medicaid certified…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-04-30 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined that the facility failed to maintain proper sanitation for storage of food in the kitchen and on the nursing units. This was evident in the kitchen, on 2 out of 4 nursing units, and on 1 random observation of a beverage cart found during an annual survey. The findings include: 1a) During the initial tour of the kitchen on 4/15/24 at 8:15 AM the surveyors observed the following: dish machine log missing evening temperature on 4/10/24, walk-in freezer stocked too full of food items and disorganized with food items on floor, gnats flying around the freezer and around bread cart, freezer fan on ceiling with ice and sediment, ice on food in freezer, open loaf of bread dated 3/14, kitchen floor with crumbs and dried stains, aluminum pan on the floor underneath the food preparation table, pair of shoes on kitchen floor, trash piled up at the entrance to kitchen door, and wet-nesting on serving pans on the drying rack in the dishwashing area.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-04-30 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolatedReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interviews it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that staff respond to call bells in a timely manner. This was found to be evident for 1 (resident #80) out of 3 residents observed for call bell response time. The findings include: During an interview conducted on 4/18/24 at 8:50 AM, Resident #80 stated that his/her call bell had not worked, and that maintenance had worked on it. This surveyor pressed the red button on the call bell, went to the hallway, and observed the resident's call bell light illuminated. The surveyors continued to observe Resident #80's call bell illuminated on 4/18/24 at 9:00 AM. The surveyors observed Geriatric Nursing Assistant (GNA) #13 & #14 walk down the hallway and go into Resident #51's room who did not have a call bell light illuminated. During an interview conducted on 4/18/24 at 9:12 AM, the surveyors witnessed an audible beep sound that came from the nursing station. The Unit Secretary #12 explained that the sound was the call bell alarm for Resident #80. The Unit Secretary further stated that she had spoken…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-04-30 · tag F0582 — isolatedGive residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview, and record review it was determined that the facility failed to have a resident's and/or Resident Representative's acknowledgement of change in coverage including any charges for services not covered under Medicare/Medicaid. This was found evident in 2 (Resident #92 ) of 3 residents for beneficiary notice review. The finding include: Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) form 10055 is known as the Skilled Nursing Facility-Advanced Beneficiary Notice of Non-coverage form (SNF-ABN). Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) form 10123 is known as the Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage form (NOMNC). It is a written notice that informs a beneficiary when their Medicare-covered service will end. Medicare requires Skilled Nursing Facilities (SNFs) to issue the SNF-ABN to Original Medicare, also called fee-for-service (FFS), beneficiaries prior to providing care that Medicare usually covers, but may not pay for in this instance because the care is: 1. Not medically reasonable and necessary; or 2. Considered custodial. The SNF-ABN form provides information…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-04-30 · tag F0625 — isolatedNotify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 1b) On 4/15/24 at 11:56 AM, the surveyor interviewed Resident #17. During this interview Resident #17 stated he/she had recently been hospitalized . On 4/19/24 at 7:47 AM, the surveyor reviewed Resident #17's medical record. The review revealed that Resident # 17 was transferred to the hospital on 3/15/24. On 4/19/24 at 11:33 AM, the surveyor requested documentation that written notice was given to Resident #17 of the bed hold policy when he/she was transferred to the hospital. The Director of Nursing (DON) stated she would look for the documentation. On 4/19/24 at 2:13 PM, the DON stated the nursing staff should be providing the bed hold policy at the time of transfer and that the business office is supposed to follow up with the resident or family member the next day. She further stated, they should be sending the policy in the mail or via email. However, she was not able to find any documentation a bed hold policy was provided to Resident #17. 1b) On 4/15/24 at 3:26 PM, the surveyor conducted a phone…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-30 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview and medical record review, it was determined that the facility failed to accurately document a resident assessment on the MDS (Minimum Data Set) as evidenced by an inaccurate coding for a resident. This was found to be evident for 1 (Resident #42) out of 1 resident reviewed for accuracy of MDS assessments. The findings include: The MDS (Minimum Data Set) is a health status screening and assessment tool used for all residents of long-term care nursing facilities. The MDS is part of the federally mandated process for clinical assessment of all residents in Medicare and Medicaid certified nursing homes. This process provides a comprehensive assessment of each resident ' s functional capabilities and helps nursing home staff identify health problems. A pressure ulcer is a bedsore or decubitus ulcer and is classified into a series of stages based on the depth of the wound. The stages include: stage 1 - intact skin with non-blanchable redness of a localized area usually over a bony prominence;…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-04-30 · tag F0655 — isolatedCreate and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review, and staff interviews, it was determined the facility staff failed to provide the resident and their representative with a summary of the baseline care plan. This was found evident for 1 (Residents #90) of 10 residents reviewed for care planning during the annual survey. The finding include: On 4/15/24 at 3:44 PM, the surveyor conducted a phone interview with Resident #90's son and daughter. During the interview the family expressed having minimal communication regarding changes to their parent's (Resident #90) plan of care. Resident #90's son stated he was the Power of Attorney for Resident #90, however his sisters were also involved. On 4/17/24 at 7:46 AM, the surveyor reviewed Resident #90's medical record. The review revealed Resident #90 had been admitted to the facility in early January of 2024 and had been recently readmitted to the facility after a hospitalization. Further review revealed two certifications related to medical condition decision making by two different providers. Both providers certified that Resident #90 lacked adequate…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-30 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interviews, and record review it was determined that the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive care plan to meet the needs of a resident. This was found evident of 2 (Resident #17 & #103) of 10 residents reviewed for care planning during an annual and complaint survey. The finding include: On 4/15/24 at 11:56 AM, the surveyor interviewed Resident #17. During the interview Resident #17 stated he/she had recently been hospitalized due to an infection after having his/her suprapubic tube (a catheter that is surgically placed in the bladder, leaves the abdomen and allows urine to drain from the bladder) was changed. On 4/19/24 at 7:47 AM, the surveyor reviewed Resident #17's medical record. The review revealed that Resident #17 was readmitted to the facility March 20th after a urinary tract infection associated with his/her suprapubic catheter. On 4/19/24 at 11:33 AM, the surveyor reviewed Resident #17's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment completed on 3/23/24. The assessment documented the resident had an indwelling catheter (suprapubic catheter) and urinary…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-30 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews, and review of facility policy, it was determined that the facility failed to utilize professional standards during medication administration. This was found evident in 1 of 26 medications observed being administered on the survey. The findings include: Nursing and other health care professionals utilize the five rights of medication administered to ensure accurate safe medication administration. The right patient, the right drug, the right route, the right time, and the right dose. All five are used as a standard for safe and medication administration practices. On 4/30/24 at 8:14 AM, the surveyor observed Certified Medication Assistant CMA Staff #37 gather medications to administer to Resident #53. The medications were located in a medication cart just outside Resident #37's room. The surveyor observed Staff #37 pull out 6 punch cards from the medication cart. Each of the cards had a label identifying the resident by the name, the name of the drug, how to be given (route) the time the medication was due to be given, and the amount. Staff #37 also…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-04-30 · tag F0694 — isolatedProvide for the safe, appropriate administration of IV fluids for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined the facility failed to follow professional standards of practice during the administration of intermittent intravenous (IV) antibiotic infusions. This was found to be evident in 2 (#43, and #376) out of 2 residents observed during the recertification survey. The findings include: Intravenous (IV) antibiotics are medications active against bacterial infections delivered into a vein by injection or through a catheter. On 04/22/24 at 07:56 AM, the surveyor observed that Resident #43's IV tubing was not labeled with the date and the end of the tubing was inserted to an upper tubing port. The Director of Nursing (DON) was at the nurses' station, so the surveyor showed her the IV tubing that was not labeled and had the end inserted to the upper port. When asked what the facility procedure was, she stated that the IV tubing end should be capped when not in use and the IV tubing should be labeled and dated. The DON stated she would talk to the nurse responsible right now and left the room. During an interview on 04/22/24…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-30 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interviews it was determined that the facility failed to administer medication according to procedures that assure accurate dispensing of medications. This was found evident of 1 of 26 medications observed being administered on the survey. Then finding include: On 4/30/24 at 8:14 AM, the surveyor observed Certified Medication Assistant CMA Staff #37 gather medications to administer to Resident #53 from a medication cart just outside Resident #37's room. The surveyor observed Staff #37 pull out 6 punch cards from the medication cart. Each of the cards had a label identifying the resident and the prescription label with administration instructions. Staff #37 also pulled out a bottle of a stock medication from the top drawer and a medication cup with a white pill in it. Staff #37 placed 1 pill from each punch card into a second mediation cup and added one pill from the stock medication bottle. 7 pills were noted in the 2nd medication cup and the one white unlabeled pill in the first medication cup. The surveyor asked Staff #37 what the white pill in the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-04-30 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolatedEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, interviews, and review of facility policy, it was determined that the facility failed to have a process in place that ensured a Resident 's medication irregularity reports were reviewed by the primary care physician and that the recommendations were addressed timely. This was found evident of 3 (#103, #90 & #42) of 5 Residents reviewed for medication regimen review. Then findings include: Medication Regimen Review (MRR) or Drug Regimen Review is a thorough evaluation of the medication regimen of a resident, with the goal of promoting positive outcomes and minimizing adverse consequences and potential risks associated with medication. The MRR includes review of the medical record in order to prevent, identify, report, and resolve medication-related problems, medication errors, or other irregularities. The MRR also involves collaborating with other members of the Interdisciplinary Team (IDT), including the resident, their family, and/or resident representative. 1a) On 4/18/24 at 7:42 AM, the surveyor reviewed the Medication Regimen Review (MRR) for Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-04-30 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility staff failed to ensure that a resident's medication regimen was free from unnecessary medication by failing to ensure that psychotropic medication had an adequate indication for use. This was evident for 1 (#103) of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The findings include: Psychotropic medications are medications that affect the brain and nervous system's chemical makeup. They are prescribed to treat a variety of conditions including mental illnesses. The Center for Medicare and Medicaid requires that any psychotropic medication prescribed to residents in long term care facilities must be prescribed, as necessary, to treat a documented, specific condition. On 4/16/24 at 12:51 PM, the surveyor reviewed Resident #103's medical record. The reviewed revealed that Resident #103 had a past medical history that included, but not limited to, cerebral infarction (stroke), abnormal gait, unspecified dementia , unspecified severity, without behavioral disturbance, psychotic disturbance, mood…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-04-30 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 1c) On 4/30/24 at 7:12 PM, the surveyor observed a medication cart that was unattended and unlocked located on 200 Unit. The medication cart was approximately 15 feet down the hallway from another mediation cart located just across from the nurses station. Two staff were observed counting medications on the cart across from the nurses station. No staff was by the unlocked medication cart. The surveyor observed both staff walk away after they were finished counting at the medication cart across from the nurses station. On 4/30/24 at 7:19 AM, the surveyor was able to open the top draw of the unlocked mediation cart located just down the 200 Unit hallway. The top drawer had multiple bottles of medications. The second drawer had punch cards with multiple doses of residents medications. The surveyor asked a nurse coming out of the nurses' station who was responsible for the unlocked medication cart. Registered Nurse Staff #38 stated she was. At that time, the Unit Manager Staff #42, came over to the medication cart.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-04-30 · tag F0775 — isolatedKeep complete, dated laboratory records in the resident's record.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interviews, and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to have laboratory results in the resident's medical record. This was found evident of 1 of 6 (Resident #324) residents reviewed for vancomycin dosing. The findings include: On 4/23/24 at 9:42 AM, the surveyor reviewed the medical record for Resident #324. The review revealed that Resident #324 had an order placed on 3/29/24 by Medical Director Staff #3. The order was for a laboratory (lab) blood draw to obtain; a complete blood count, comprehensive metabolic panel, hemoglobin A1c, varicella titer, c-reactive protein, vancomycin trough on Monday, one time only for a baseline until 4/1/24. An additional lab order was written on 4/3/24 for a complete blood count, basic metabolic panel, erythrocyte sedimentation rate, c-reactive protein, vancomycin level every Wednesday. On 4/23/24 at 9:53 AM, the surveyor reviewed the policy titled, Diagnostic Tests. In step 2 it calls for the diagnostic service to be notified. Step 3 states, obtain report of diagnostic test. The last step states, maintain signed and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-30 · tag F0791 — failed to provide routine dental services — isolatedProvide or obtain dental services for each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review it was determined that the facility staff failed to promptly provide or obtain visit/appointments for routine dental care or treatment. This was found to be evident for 2 (Resident # 74 and #88) out of 2 residents reviewed for dental services during an annual survey. The findings include: 1) During an initial screening, on 04/16/24 at 12:24 PM, Resident #74 stated, I did not remember if I ever had a dentist visit here. Record review, on 4/17/24 at 01:47 PM, of Resident #74's record revealed that he/she was admitted on [DATE] to this facility with the diagnoses of cardiac arrhythmia, dementia, and anemia. Resident #74 was on Medicaid since 2/11/2023 and he/she was able to answer questions appropriately and made his/her needs known. During interview, on 4/24/24 at 09:38 AM, Unit Manager, Staff #9, stated that this resident did not have any dental visit since he/she was admitted to this facility on 6/09/22. She stated that she had just completed a dental referral and the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-04-30 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain medical records in accordance with acceptable professional standards and practices by keeping complete and accurate documentation. This was found evident in 3 of 54 (Resident #322, #4 and #103) residents reviewed during the survey. The findings include: MOLST is a portable and enduring medical order form covering options for cardiopulmonary resuscitation and other life-sustaining treatments. The medical orders are based on a patient's wishes about medical treatments. 1a) On 4/16/24 at 12:18 PM, the surveyor reviewed Resident # 322's paper medical chart. The review revealed a D.C. Medical Order for Scope of Treatment (MOLST). The order indicated the resident wished to have [NAME]-Pulmonary Resuscitation if he/she were to have no pulse or was not breathing. The resident's verbal signature was noted on 3/26/24. On 4/19/24 at 12:27 PM, the surveyor reviewed Resident #322's electronic medical record. The review revealed a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-04-30 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, and interview it was determined that the facility failed to document the rational for non-administration of the pneumococcal vaccination. This was found evident for 1 (Resident #86) out of 5 residents reviewed for vaccinations during an annual survey. The findings include: Pneumococcal vaccines are vaccines against the bacterium Streptococcus pneumoniae. Pneumococcal vaccine can prevent some cases of pneumonia, meningitis, and sepsis against the bacterium Streptococcus pneumoniae. Prevnar 30 is a pneumococcal vaccine. Point Click Care (PCC) is a cloud-based healthcare software provider helping Long-Term Care. ImmuNet is Maryland's immunization information system (IIS). An IIS is a confidential and secure computer database designed to collect and maintain vaccination records of children and adults. When the surveyor requested copies of the vaccination pneumococcal consent/declination for Resident #86 on 4/24/24 at 08:34 AM, the Director of Nursing (DON) stated that they were not up to date with documentation of the vaccines getting placed in PCC especially on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-04-30 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — isolatedKeep all essential equipment working safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and staff interview it was determined the facility failed to keep the kitchen walk-in freezer in safe operating condition. This was evident during the initial tour of the kitchen and during subsequent visits. The findings include: 1. On 7/18/24 at 8:39 AM, an initial tour of the facility's kitchen was performed with the Dietary Manager. When the door was opened to the walk-in freezer it was like walking into a cloud and the visibility of items in the freezer was very difficult to see. 2. There were small mounds of ice covering the entire ceiling of the freezer. There was a built-up ice clump and ice cycles of the 2 circular fans of the main unit. Ice was observed to be on boxes of food, shelving and on the food packages. 3. The Strip curtains were missing from the freezer and refrigerator. At 11:45 AM a revisit of the freezer revealed the following: 1. The fans were not running. 2. The ice on the fans was melting and water was noted on the floor. 3. The ice built up on the ceiling has now melted. 4. The boxes were wet along with the food on the shelves. 5. The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-30 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — isolatedMake sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined that the facility failed to maintain an effective pest control program as evidenced by the presence of rodents and insects. This was found to be evident during observations for pest control in the kitchen and nursing unit. The findings include: On the initial tour of the facility's kitchen on 4/15/24 at 8:15 AM with the Assistant Food Service Director (#6), the surveyors observed gnats flying around by the bread cart. At 9:45 AM on 4/15/24 the surveyors and the Nursing Home Administrator (NHA) observed gnats in the entrance of the kitchen. On 4/17/24 at 8:19 AM during a random tour of the Nursing Unit 300, the surveyors observed gnats and 2 mouse traps in room [ROOM NUMBER]. At 8:47 AM on 4/24/24 the surveyors conducted a follow-up tour of the kitchen with the Food Service Director (FSD) #5. On this tour of the kitchen the surveyors observed a large amount of mouse droppings on the floor in the dry storage room behind and in between 2 storage…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-04-30 · tag F0687 — failed to care for feet properly — isolatedProvide appropriate foot care.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interviews it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a podiatry consult was provided in a timely manner. This was found to be evident for 1 (Resident #122) out of 1 resident reviewed for foot care. The findings include: Erythema means reddening of the skin due to inflammation which is usually a result of accumulation of cells of the immune system and chemicals these cells release. There can be many reasons for the occurrence of erythema: exposure to heat, insect bites, infections, allergy, non-ionizing radiation (sunlight, UV) and ionizing radiation (X-ray, nuclear radiation). According to the Centers of Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) cellulitis is a common bacterial skin infection that causes redness, swelling, and pain in the infected area of the skin. If untreated, it can spread and cause serious health problems. On 04/29/2024 at 6:43 PM review of the provider's note (encounter note) dated 07/28/2022 for Resident #122 explained that the provider was alerted by nurses to erythema noted in the right first toe. The provider noted that…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-12-04 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and interview, the facility staff failed to report the elopement of a resident (resident #43) from the facility. This was evident for 1 out of 44 residents reviewed during a complaint survey. Findings include: Review of resident #43's medical record on 12/5/23 at 9:22 am revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] for rehabilitation from a fall that occurred in his/her home. The resident ambulates using a wheelchair. Additional review of the resident's medical record on 12/5/23 at 9:24 am revealed the resident has no evidence of medical incapacitation and his/her BIMS assessments revealed the resident was cognitively intact. Review of resident #43's medical record on 12/5/23 at 9:30 am revealed the resident had an elopement attempt on 10/28/23 at approximately 3:00 PM. Facility nursing staff discovered the resident was outside of the building at 3:00 PM. Assessments completed on 10/28/23 at approximately 4:00 PM revealed the resident sustained no injuries but the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-12-04 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and staff interview it was determined the facility failed to conduct a thorough investigations into allegations of neglect and abuse. This was evident for 4 of 4 (#5 and #9, # 12, and # 27) residents reviewed during this complaint investigation. The findings include: 1. Review on 12/1/23 at 9:56 AM of the FRI occurring on 8/17/22 regarding an allegation of employee to resident abuse occurring in 8/2022, failed to include interviews with any other residents or staff regarding their experience or observations with the staff in question. 2. Review on 12/1/23 11:30 AM of the facility reported incident (FRI) regarding an allegation of employee to resident abuse occurring in 12/2021 failed to include interviews with any other residents or staff regarding their experience or observations with the staff in question. The surveyors review of that FRI found concerns related to the assigned GNA #27's transfer protocol. The DON was interviewed on 12/4/23 at 12:12 PM and made aware of the concerns at that time and throughout the survey. She was not employed here at the time…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-12-04 · tag F0637 — isolatedAssess the resident when there is a significant change in condition
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and interview, the facility staff failed to assess a resident (resident #43) after a significant change, an elopement attempt, from the facility. This was evident for 1 out of 44 residents reviewed during a complaint survey. Findings include: Review of resident #43's medical record on 12/5/23 at 9:22 am revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] for rehabilitation from a fall that occurred in his/her home. The resident ambulates using a wheelchair. Additional review of the resident's medical record revealed the resident has no evidence of medical incapacitation and his/her BIMS assessments revealed the resident was cognitively intact. Review of resident #43's medical record on 12/5/23 at 9:30 am revealed the resident had an elopement attempt on 10/28/23. Facility nursing staff discovered the resident was outside of the building at 3:00 PM. Assessments completed on 10/28/23 at approximately 4:00 PM revealed the resident sustained no injuries but the resident was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-04 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on the review of a complaint, observations, interview, and medical record review, it was determined that the facility failed to provide the ordered feeding assistance to a resident. This was evident for 1 of 2 residents observed on the 400 unit. The findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #9 revealed diagnosis including dysphagia (trouble swallowing) following a stroke and hemiplegia (weakness) affecting the right dominant side. Review of the physician orders for Resident #9 on 12/1/23 at 9:56 AM revealed an order from 9/2022; Patient to be fed- patient may say [resident] is full this is due to [resident] stroke. please attempt at least 3 (three different times- she will take a little each time) Resident #9 was interviewed and observed on 12/4/23 from 8:39 AM to 9:13 AM. At 8:55 AM his/her breakfast tray was delivered and set up, then the GNA left the room. The surveyor walked the hallway outside the room for the next 18 minutes to see if any staff entered the room to assist Resident #9. Resident #9 was observable from the hallway. S/he could be seen…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-04 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, interview and review of a facility reported incident, it was determined that the facility failed to follow the plan of care for transferring a resident. This was evident for the review of 3 of 3 (#5 and # 27 and # 43 ) residents reviewed during the complaint survey. The findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #5 on 12/4/23 at 11:30 AM revealed diagnosis including Parkinsons disease, a progressive disease affecting the nervous system. A further review of Resident #5's medical record revealed care plan notes documenting that assistance was needed and that s/he was dependent on activities of daily living and for transfers. Additionally, a minimum data set (a standardized assessment tool that measures health status in nursing home residents) assessment was completed on 12/15/21 under functional status assessing him/her as an 'extensive assist' of 2 persons. On admission the facility staff completed a lift transfer reposition assessment on 12/6/21 assessing…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-12-04 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a random tour of the facility, it was evident that the facility failed to secure all medications out of the reach of all vulnerable adults. This was evident during a tour of the facility on 1 of 4 wings. (400). The findings include: On 12/4/23 at 9:06 AM, surveyor entered the 400 unit via the closed double doors. Immediately on the floor the surveyor saw a pinkish colored item in front of rooms [ROOM NUMBERS]. Resident #42, whose diagnosis includes dementia with behavioral disturbances, was observed in the vicinity wheeling slowly around. S/he resides in room [ROOM NUMBER]. Upon closer observation the pinkish item was identified as a pill with an inscription of 894 on it. A search of the national institutes of health (NIH) and the Food and Drug Administration web sites to confirm, the pill was identified as an Eliquis-anticoagulant. The closest staff was immediately notified to please come over. The staff, later identified as CMA #28, initially stated that she was busy, then came over at the surveyor's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-12-04 · tag F0943 — isolatedGive their staff education on dementia care, and what abuse, neglect, and exploitation are; and how to report abuse, neglect, and exploitation.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on review of facility reported incidents, interviews, and review of employee files, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure abuse training was completed prior to Geriatric Nursing Assistants (GNA) working on the floor with residents. This was evident during the review of 1 of 3 employee files. The findings include: During the review of 2 facility reported incidents concerning potential abuse, the employee file of staff GNA #27 was requested on 12/3/23 at 11:05 AM from the facility Director of Nursing. On 12/5/23 at 12:36 PM after interviews with the facility Nurse Practice Educator and the DON as well as concurrent review of GNA #27's employee file, who was hired in 2021, failed to reveal documentation on the needed and necessary training of activities that constitute abuse, neglect, or misappropriation of resident property and dementia management and further the procedures for reporting and prevention.
- Potential for harm · D2019-04-26 · tag F0622 — isolatedNot transfer or discharge a resident without an adequate reason; and must provide documentation and convey specific information when a resident is transferred or discharged.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview with the Director of Nursing DON) on 4/24/19 at 8:30 AM a care plan was not sent with Resident # 22 that was sent to the hospital on 3/29/129. This was evident for 1 of 42 residents. The findings include: On 3/29/19 Resident #22 was transferred to the hospital with bilateral leg cellulitis, severe sepsis, altered mental status and A-FIB. The resident had redness and swelling in bilateral lower legs. Resident # 22 returned to facility on 4/6/19. The following transfer papers were sent with the resident: Resident transfer form, Any personal belongings identified, Face sheet, Current medication list, Change of condition report, Advanced Directives, Any other orders, flow sheets, lab, x-rays . Bed hold policy was given to resident. A written letter of transfer and bed hold policy was given to Responsible Party (RP). A care plan was not sent with resident to the hospital. The DON (Director of Nursing) on 04/24/19 08:30 AM stated that a copy of the care plan was not sent.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-04-26 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation of Resident # 15, interview with staff # 2 on 4/25/19 at 11:12 AM and record review, the facility failed to do an accurate assessment for Resident # 15 that smokes. This was evident for 1 out of 2 residents that smoke. The findings include: The latest smoking assessment for Resident # 15 was completed on 3/20/19. Resident # 15 has a BIMs of 15, has no dementia, does not have poor memory, and resident is able to show the location area for smoking. The same smoking assessment also states that resident cannot hold a cigarette safely, cannot light a cigarette, cannot properly dispose of a cigarette and cannot smoke safely without a smoking apron. Assessment indicated the Resident # 15 is not allowed to smoke as this is a nonsmoking facility. Interview with Unit Manager staff #2 on 4/25/19 at 11:12 AM who stated that the resident does smoke as she was grand fathered in, although this is a nonsmoking facility. A care plan is on the chart for smoking. The Unit Manager stated, I did the assessment and it is not correct. Staff member # 2 restated the assessment was wrong…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2019-04-26 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation of Resident # 109 on 4/25/19 at 10:30 AM and record review, the resident was not turned and repositioned every 2 hours as ordered by the physician. This was evident for 1 out of 42 residents. The findings include: On 3/20/19 Resident # 109 received an in house acquired pressure wound on his coccyx that measured 1.8 cm x 1.5 cm. Pressure ulcer is a stage 2. The wound now measures 1.3 x 0.2 as of 4/19/19. Treatment orders include: clean wound with wound cleanser, apply hydrogel and cover. The resident is to be turned and repositioned every 2 hours. A care plan is in place, an observation of Resident #109 was done on 4/25/19 at 10:30 AM. The resident was currently in the bed on back. Resident # 109 stated he/she cannot turn and reposition self and that staff do not turn reposition him/her on a routine basis. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) is part of the U.S. federally mandated process for clinical assessment of all residents in Medicare or Medicaid certified nursing homes. This process provides a comprehensive assessment of each resident's functional capabilities and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$16,331 in federal fines across 1 penalty.
- $16,331 — penalty dated 2024-04-30
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to GENESIS HEALTHCARE — 184 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 3 of 5 | 2.4 | +0.6 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 3 of 5 | 2.3 | +0.7 vs chain |
| Staffing | 3 of 5 | 2.5 | +0.5 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 4 of 5 | 3.5 | +0.5 vs chain |
The other 183 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.4★, per CMS)
Showing 40 of 183; lowest-rated first.
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MAGNOLIA GARDENS LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 100% | since 04/01/2014 |
| DOCTORS COMMUNITY HEALTH VENTURES INC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 05/01/2014 |
| FC-GEN OPERATIONS INVESTMENT LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 12/01/2012 |
| GEN OPERATIONS I LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 12/01/2012 |
| GEN OPERATIONS II LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 12/01/2012 |
| GENESIS HEALTHCARE INC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 12/01/2018 |
| GENESIS HEALTHCARE LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 12/01/2012 |
| GENESIS HOLDINGS LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 12/01/2018 |
| GHC JV HOLDINGS LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 05/01/2014 |
| MAGNOLIA JV LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 05/01/2014 |
| SUN HEALTHCARE GROUP INC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 11/15/2022 |
| WHITMAN, ARNOLD | Individual | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 11/15/2022 |
| BERG, MICHAEL | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 12/01/2012 |
| BRIDGEFORD, LAURA | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 06/01/2024 |
| MENDELSON, AVI | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 06/01/2024 |
| BAQAI, SADIA | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 06/01/2024 |
| BRICE, JOHN | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 06/01/2024 |
| MORRIS, DIANE | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 12/23/2023 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 21 rows in the source record cover these 18 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
11 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $2.4M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 12% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in MD
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Maryland Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 215108. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-12-15, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.