Marshwood Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

60.4% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 132 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 39.2% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 130 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.43 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 74% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 19% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 108 beds and averages 101.4 residents a day — about 94% occupied, or roughly 7 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.98 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 1.03 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.42 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.77 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.06 on weekdays — 7% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.10 to 0.87 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 34% is below the national median of 45%. 2 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

29 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 19 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-03-18 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to adequately provide housekeeping and maintenance services necessary to maintain the building in a sanitary, orderly, and comfortable environment on 6 of 7 units ([NAME], [NAME], [NAME], [NAME], [NAME] and [NAME]) 2 of 2 facility tours.(3/16/26 and 3/18/26)Findings:On 3/18/26 from 3:00 p.m. to 3:45 p.m., two surveyor conducted an Environmental tour with the Administrator, the Director of Nursing, the Maintenance Director, the Maintenance Assistant and the Housekeeping Supervisor in which the following findings were discussed and/or observed. [NAME] Unit:- There were six(6) cracked/broken floor tiles approximately forty one(41) cracked/broken floor tiles in the dining area. - Resident room [ROOM NUMBER] - The bathroom walls were marred/marked with black marks by the baseboard heater. - Resident room [ROOM NUMBER] - A surveyor had observed the heating unit to be pulled away from the wall. This was confirmed by and with the Market Clinical Advisor 3/16/26…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-03-18 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — pattern
  Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to review and revise the care plan by an interdisciplinary team (IDT), that included, to the extent possible, participation of the resident and/or his/her representative after each Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for 5 of 28 residents reviewed for care planning (Residents #1, #8, #35, #60, and #63). Findings: 1. Review of Resident #1's medical record contained a Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) version 3.0 dated 1/6/26. The clinical record lacked evidence of his/her IDT meeting being held within 7 days of the quarterly MDS assessment On 3/18/26 at 9:30 a.m., in an interview with the Market Clinical Advisor, who confirmed that Resident #1's IDT meeting was not held within 7 days of the quarterly MDS assessment. 2. Review of Resident #8's medical record contained a Quarterly MDS version 3.0 dated 12/16/25 and 3/12/26. The clinical record lacked evidence of his/her IDT meeting being held within 7 days of the two quarterly MDS assessments. 3. Review of Resident #60's medical record contained a Quarterly MDS version 3.0 dated…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-03-18 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  Based on observations and interviews the facility failed to ensure the kitchen was maintained in a clean and sanitary manner for walls, floors, air conditioner vents, and ceiling tiles for 1 of 1 kitchen tour (3/16/26).Findings:On 3/16/26 from 8:16 a.m. to 8:48 a.m. two surveyors conducted an initial kitchen tour with the Director of Operations for Dietary for Health Care Services in which the following findings were observed and discussed:-The wall behind the stove has missing sheet rock.-The kitchen floor had food debris and trash under tables and equipment.-The floor in the walk-in freezer had chipped/missing paint creating an uncleanable surface.-The air conditioner vents were soiled with dust/dirt.-Approximately 15 ceiling tiles and the ceiling grids above the stove were stained yellowish and soiled with dust/dirt.On 3/16/26 at 8:48 a.m., in an interview with two surveyors, the Director of Operations of Dietary for Health Care Services confirmed the findings.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-03-18 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — pattern
  Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to ensure the Medication Administration Records (MAR) and Treatment Administration Records (TAR) were accurately completed for 7 of 28 residents reviewed (Resident #1, #3, #8, #14, #35, #60, and #63).Findings: 1. On 4/2/25 a surveyor reviewed Resident #1's clinical record which showed an active physician order initiated on 12/9/25 for Humalog Solution 100 units/milliliters with instructions to Inject per sliding scale if 0-150= 0 units (if blood glucose is less than 70, call MD (medical doctor); 151-200 = 2 units; 201-250 = 4 units; 251-300 = 6 units; 301-230 = 8 units; 351+ = 10 units and 9 (if blood glucose is greater than 400, call MD immediately for further instruction), subcutaneously before meals for sliding scale insulin coverage for diabetes must take finger stick blood glucose prior to administration. A review of his/her Medication Administration Record/Treatment Administration Record for the month of March, lacked evidence that Resident #1's blood sugars were checked and insulin was given on 3/1/26, 3/5/26,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-03-18 · tag F0557 — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to be treated with respect and dignity and to retain and use personal possessions.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to protect and promote a resident's dignity for 1 of 2 residents sampled for hygiene for 2 of 3 days of survey. (Resident #24).Findings:Resident #24 was admitted to facility in February 2026 with diagnoses of right tibia and fibula fracture.The most recent Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) was 14 out of 15 indicating [he/she] is cognitively intact.Review of Resident#24's current care plan initiated 2/10/26 stated, Resident is at risk for decreased ability to perform ADL(s) (Activities of Dailly Living) in grooming, personal hygiene requires 1 person extensive assistance with bathing, and grooming .On 3/16/26 at 10:56 a.m., observation of Resident #24 sitting in his/her wheelchair with long white facial hair on his/her chin. At this time, during an interview the resident was asked if having facial hair was a concern. The resident replied, Yes it does, I have tried to get someone to help me, there's men here so I know they have shavers. The surveyor…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-18 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and a review of Safety Data Sheets (SDS), the facility failed to ensure that the resident environment remained free from the potential risk of accidents, relating to the storage of chemicals being properly secured for 1 of 3 days of survey (3/16/26).Findings:On 3/16/26 at 11:18 a.m., observation of the [NAME] unit spa with an unlocked and ajar closet door which residents had access to. Closer observation showed the closet contained 5 gallons of Cid-A-L (tm) II (disinfectant, virucide and fungicide chemical).Safety Data Sheet noted the following:Restrictions of Use: Do not ingest. Avoid contact with skin and eyes. Keep out of reach of children. Do not allow product to go directly down storm sewer.First Aid Measures Eye Contact: Flush eyes with plenty of water for at least 15 minutes. Skin Contact: Wash off skin and remove contaminated clothing. Do not reuse contaminated clothing. Inhalation: If dust, vapors or mist cause distress, remove to fresh air. Use oxygen or artificial…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-18 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — isolated
  Dispose of garbage and refuse properly.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to maintain a garbage storage area in a sanitary condition to prevent the harborage and feeding of pests for 3 of 3 dumpsters for 1 of 3 days of survey (3/16/26).Finding:On 3/16/26 at 8:18 a.m., a surveyor observed food and trash to be on the ground around 3 of 3 dumpsters.On 3/16/26 at 8:48 a.m., in an interview with two surveyors the Director of Operations for Dietary for Health Care confirmed the finding.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-03-18 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, interviews, record review and facility policy, the facility failed to maintain an Infection Control Program designed to provide a sanitary environment to help prevent the development and transmission of disease and infection related to the management of residents with Clostridium Difficile (C-diff - a highly contagious bacterium (germ) that causes diarrhea and colitis) infection for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for Transmission Based Precautions. (#117)Finding:Resident #117 was admitted with a diagnosis of Clostridioides difficile. The current care plan for actual infection of Clostridioides difficile initiated on 3/14/26, had interventions of Contact Precautions.On 3/16/26 at 10:33 a.m., observation of Resident #117's room with a posted Contact Precautions sign on the door instructing staff to put on gloves and a gown before entering the room. Next to the door was a 3 draw plastic bin containing Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) of gloves and gowns. At this time, Resident #117 stated he/she was on contact precautions due to having C-diff and is on an…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-12-19 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews and interview, the facility failed to ensure that the resident and/or resident representative written information, concerning the right to accept or refuse medical or surgical treatment and/or formulate and advanced directive, was completed for 4 of 10 residents reviewed for advanced directives. (Residents #70, #90, #306, and #405) Findings: 1. Resident #70 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident #70's clinical record lacked evidence that the facility provided/obtained resident and/or resident representative written information concerning the right to accept or refuse medical or surgical treatment and/or formulate an advance directive. 2. Resident #90 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident #90 's clinical record lacked evidence that the facility provided/obtained resident and/or resident representative written information concerning the right to accept or refuse medical or surgical treatment and/or formulate an advance directive. On 12/17/24 at 3:25…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-12-19 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and interview, the facility failed to adequately provide housekeeping and maintenance services necessary to maintain the building in a sanitary, orderly, and comfortable environment on 7 of 7 units ([NAME], [NAME], [NAME], [NAME], [NAME], [NAME] and [NAME]) and the Activity Room for 1 of 1 facility tour. Findings: On 12/19/24 from 8:05 a.m. to 8:40 a.m., 2 surveyors conducted an Environmental Tour with the Maintenance Director, the Director of Nursing and the Administrator in which the following findings were observed: [NAME] Unit(100s) - Resident room [ROOM NUMBER] - The privacy curtain was missing hooks and hanging down and in disrepair. The room heating unit had a cracked/broken top plastic grill with rough edges. The bathrooms walls were marred/marked with black marks. - Resident room [ROOM NUMBER] - The bathroom floor was heavily soiled with dirt. - Resident room [ROOM NUMBER] - The caulking around the base of the toilet was dirty. The privacy curtain was missing hooks and hanging down…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to GENESIS HEALTHCARE — 184 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 19 rows in the source record cover these 16 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

9 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $3.0M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 22% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in ME