Orono Commons
117 Bennoch Rd, Orono, ME 04473 · For profit - Corporation · 80 certified beds · (207) 866-4914 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Mar 2024
- it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- it has 1 actual-harm citation
- a high number of inspection citations overall (44) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $10,358 in federal fines (most recent 2025-05-07)
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
- its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (2/5)
- nursing-staff turnover (56%) runs well above the national median (45%)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 2 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 3 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 2 of 5 |
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 2 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 1 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 3 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 30.8% | 24.4% | 15.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 8.8% | 5.2% | 5.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.0% | 1.1% | 0.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 6.9% | 2.2% | 2.0% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 15.2% | 11.6% | 6.5% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 2.0% | 4.1% | 3.3% | better |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 26.8% | 25.6% | 16.1% | worse |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 13.0% | 17.4% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 98.2% | 95.5% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 10.8% | 4.3% | 4.7% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 31.6% | 29.2% | 21.2% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 29.6% | 20.2% | 17.1% | worse |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 3.9% | 1.2% | 1.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 23.8% | 74.5% | 79.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 19.2% | 20.8% | 22.6% | better |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 9.8% | 16.1% | 12.0% | better |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 1.30 | 1.45 | 1.67 | better |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 1.44 | 2.01 | 1.80 | better |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
56.1% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 178 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 55.1% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 89 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.41 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 70% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 31% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 56.1%CMS range 48.5–63.0 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 9.8%CMS range 6.8–13.5 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 55.1% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 52.8% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 67.4% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 99.2% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 52.5% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 10.6% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 8.2%CMS range 5.1–11.9 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 0.94 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 80 beds and averages 74.1 residents a day — about 93% occupied, or roughly 6 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.54 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 1.19 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.20 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.33 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.63 on weekdays — 8% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.33 to 0.85 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 56% is well above the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
44 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 33 are one tap away and print in full.
- Actual harm · G2025-05-07 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to provide pain management in a timely manner for 2 of 2 residents reviewed for pain management (Resident #40 [R40] and R268). Due to this facility's failure, R268 experienced consistent, unrelieved pain resulting in the resident discharging Against Medical Advice (AMA) to seek pain control from an emergency room (ER). Findings: 1. On 5/6/25, a review of the clinical record for R268 revealed the following: -R268 was admitted on [DATE] for skilled therapy after a spinal surgery. -Review of the admission orders revealed an order for MS Contin Oral Tablet Extended Release 30 [milligrams (MG)] (Morphine Sulfate) Give 30mg by mouth every 8 hours for pain, and acetaminophen Tablet 325 MG (Acetaminophen) Give 2 tablet by mouth every 4 hours as needed for Mild Pain no more than 3 doses in 48 hours, notify physician/ advanced practice provider(APP). Do not exceed 3[grams(g)]/day. (standing order). -Review of the admission assessment, dated 11/19/24 and completed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-01-13 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — patternProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to follow physician orders by not checking vital signs prior to administration of blood pressure medications or administered blood pressure medications when they were outside of physician ordered parameters for 4 of 4 blood pressure medications reviewed with parameters for Resident #1. Findings:On 1/13/26 at 11:50 a.m., the Administrator and surveyor reviewed R1's physician orders for blood pressure medications and the documentation in the vital signs record and Medication Administration Record (MAR) for December 2025 for R1. The following were confirmed during this review:1. A physician order, dated 12/10/25, for Carvedilol directed staff to hold this medication if systolic blood pressure (SBP) was less than 110 or if heart rate was less than 60. This medication was ordered to be given once between 7 a.m.- 12 p.m. and once between 4 p.m. - 10 p.m. It was noted that between 12/10/25 - 12/23/25, blood pressure and pulse were not documented on the MAR. -On 12/11/25, documentation in the vital signs record indicated that the SBP…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-09 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, facility policy review, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to follow it's own policy after a new pressure ulcer was observed, for 1 of 1 resident reviewed (Resident #1 [R1]). On 12/1/25, a pressure ulcer was observed on R1's right big toe but a treatment/monitoring was not started until 12/9/25, 8 days later. Finding: The facility's policy, Skin Integrity and Wound Management, revised 9/15/25, stated the nursing assistant will observe skin daily and report any changes or concerns to the nurse. The licensed nurse will: evaluate any reported or suspected skin changes or wounds; document newly identified skin/wound impairments as a change in condition; document skin/wound findings on the 24-hour report; perform and document skin inspection on all newly admitted /readmitted patients weekly thereafter and with any significant change of condition; and complete wound evaluation upon admission/readmission, new in-house acquired, weekly, with unanticipated decline in wounds, and at planned discharge. On 12/8/25 at 10:07 a.m., during an interview with a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-12-09 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable disease and infections in the area of Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) and linen handling for 1 of 1 day of survey (12/9/25).Findings:1. The facility's policy, Enhanced Barrier Precautions, revised on 11/14/25, indicated that in addition to Standard Precautions, Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) will be used (when Contact Precautions do not otherwise apply) for novel or targeted multi-drug resistant organisms (MDROs). EBP expands on the use of gown and gloves beyond anticipated blood and body fluid exposures, focusing on use of gown and gloves only during high contact patient care activities that have been demonstrated to result in transfer of MDROs to hands and clothing of healthcare personnel, even if blood and body exposure is not anticipated.The facility's procedure,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-05-07 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — widespreadProvide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on Payroll Based Journal staffing (PBJ) report and interview, the facility failed to ensure sufficient direct care staff were scheduled and on duty to meet the needs of residents that reside in the facility for weekends of the first quarter 2025 (October 1 - December 31, 2024). Finding: A payroll based journal (PBJ) report for the first quarter of 2025 indicated the facility triggered for low weekend staffing. On 5/6/25 at 1:50 p.m., during an interview with the surveyor, the Administrator confirmed that the facility triggered for low weekend staffing for the first quarter per the PBJ report. The Administrator confirmed this finding and no additional information was provided to indicate that the PBJ information was incorrect which identified low weekend staffing.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-05-07 · tag F0655 — patternCreate and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on clinical record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a baseline care plan was developed and implemented within 48 hours, that included the instructions needed to provide minimum healthcare information necessary to properly care for 5 of 10 sampled residents (Resident #40 [R40], R166, R56, R50, and R60). Findings: 1. On 5/6/25 during a clinical record review for R40, admitted to the facility for skilled care. The clinical record shows that R40's baseline care plan was not implemented or developed to provide the instructions needed to provide minimum healthcare necessary to properly care for R40. On 5/6/25 at 11:30 a.m. during an interview with the Regional Marketing Advisor the surveyor confirmed that R40's baseline care plan was not developed until 4 days after admission. 2. On 5/6/25 during a clinical record review for R166, admitted to the facility for skilled care. The clinical record shows that R166's baseline care plan was not implemented or developed to provide the instructions needed to provide minimum healthcare necessary to properly care for R166. On…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-05-07 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — patternProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on clinical record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to follow physician orders for 4 of 20 residents reviewed. (Resident #40 [R40], R51, and R172). Findings: 1. On 5/6/25 at 8:00 a.m. during a clinical record review for R40 shows an order for Aspirin 81 milligrams (mg) by mouth twice a day for clot prevention. Review of R40's Medication Administration Record (MAR) shows that R40 did not receive his/her bedtime dose as ordered. (this is a stock medication that was available but not given) R40 also had an order for Quetiapine 25 mg at bedtime, review of his/her MAR shows that this medication was not given as ordered. The facility has an Ekit (emergency kit) called Rx now that has medications available for use. This list included the Quetiapine 25 mg dose for R40 On 5/6/25 at 10:15 a.m. during an interview with the Director of Nursing (DON), and the Marketing Advisor the surveyor confirmed that Aspirin is a house stock medication and was not given to R40 as ordered and that the RX Now system had the dose of Quetiapine that was ordered for R40, and that this medication…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-05-07 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, and interviews, the facility failed to store, prepare, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety by not restraining hair with a hair net for 1 of 4 days of survey (5/4/25), ensuring the dishes were sanitized with regular monitoring of the dishwasher for 2 of 4 days of survey (5/4/25 and 5/5/25), not ensuring that plumbing fixtures were properly installed to prevent backflow as required by the Maine State Plumbing Code for 2 of 4 days of survey (5/4/25 and 5/5/25), not maintaining food temperatures to prevent food borne illness prior to serving residents for 1 of 4 days of survey (5/5/25), and not storing dishes in a sanitary manner for 2 of 4 days of survey (5/5/25 and 5/6/25), In addition, the facility failed to ensure that beverages were removed when outdated or failed to include an open date in 2 of 2 unit refrigerators (Homestead and Riverview). This has the potential to effect all residents in the facility. Findings: 1. On 5/4/25 at 10:20 a.m.,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-05-07 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolatedHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident's right to formulate an advanced directive regarding code status (cardiopulmonary resuscitation [CPR]) was accurate in the clinical record for (Resident #60 [R60]). Finding: On [DATE] at 1:38 p.m., R60's clinical record was reviewed. R60's electronic record indicated (Advanced Directives) DO NOT RESUSCITATE (DNR) (Do not perform CPR). R60's paper chart contained a Physicians Orders for Life Sustaining Treatment (POLST) form indicating Attempt Resuscitation/CPR. On [DATE] at 12:36 p.m., during an interview with a surveyor and an LPN, R60's electronic and paper charts were reviewed. LPN stated she was unsure which directive was correct. At this time the surveyor confirmed R60's advance directive regarding code status had conflicting information.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-07 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on the facility's policy, Reportable Incident Form review, and interview, the facility failed to notify the State Agencies (Division of Licensing and Certification [DLC]) and Adult Protective Services (APS) timely for an allegation of abuse for 1 of 3 facility reported incidents (9/16/24) reviewed during an annual survey. Finding: The facility's policy, Abuse Prohibition, last reviewed 10/24/22, directed staff to Report allegations to the appropriate state and local authority(s) involving neglect, exploitation or mistreatment (including injuries of unknown source), suspected criminal activity, and misappropriation of patient property within 24 hours if the event does not result in serious bodily injury. On 9/16/24, the State Agency - Division of Licensing and Certification (DLC), received a fax from the facility that included a Reportable Incident Form that alleged a resident to resident incident occurred on 9/12/24. The report indicated that the physician and Resident Representatives were notified of the incident on 9/12/24. On 5/5/25 at 12:25 p.m., during an interview with a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-05-07 · tag F0644 — isolatedCoordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure that the State mental health authority for Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) was notified after a resident was newly diagnosed and/or experienced symptoms related to a mental disorder or trauma event to determine if a change in level of service was required for 1 of 2 sampled residents reviewed for PASRR (Resident #18 [R18]). Finding: On 5/4/25, R18's clinical record was reviewed. R18's PASARR, completed on 2/15/22, did not require a level II determination. On 8/6/24, R18 was diagnosed with bipolar disorder, but the clinical record lacked evidence that the resident was referred to the State mental health authority for a new PASARR determination. On 5/7/25 at 8:35 a.m., during an interview with a surveyor, the Administrator stated a new PASARR was submitted for R18 on 5/6/25. At this time a surveyor confirmed the facility failed to refer R18 for a PASARR after a new diagnosis and/or experienced symptoms related to a mental disorder.
Show the remaining 33 citations
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-07 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to provide respiratory care as order by the Provider for 1of 3 residents that use oxygen. Resident #165 [R165]) Finding: On 5/6/25 during a clinical record review for R165, it was noted that R165 uses oxygen daily and has had an order change dated 5/1/25 for oxygen to be administered by nasal cannula (NC) at 2 liters/min every shift for maintaining peripheral oxygen saturation (SPO2) between 88-93% evaluate HR (heart rate), respiratory rate, pulse oximetry, skin color and breath sounds. R165's clinical record was reviewed and there is no evidence that this order was completed as ordered as there is no documentation showing that his/her respiratory rate, skin color and breath sounds were evaluated as ordered. On 5/06/25 at 2:46 p.m., during a clinical record review for R165 the surveyor confirmed with the Director of Nursing, the Administrator and the Clinical Market Advisor that there is no nursing documented evidence of R165's respiratory rate, skin color and breath sounds being evaluated every shift as ordered.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-07 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — isolatedEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, observations, and two lunch meal test trays, the facility failed to serve hot foods at an appetizing and palpable temperature for 1 of 2 lunch trays tested on [DATE] and 5/6/25. Findings: On 5/4/25 between 10:15 a.m. and 11:30 a.m., during a facility initial tour, several residents stated to the surveyors that hot foods were served cold. On 05/5/25 at 12:45 p.m., two surveyors tested food temperatures on a lunch test tray at the end of lunch delivery service to the residents on the Riverview Unit. The following food temperatures were: Cubed chicken was 96.4 degrees Fahrenheit and had a taste sensation of cool to cold. Macaroni and cheese was 94.3 degrees Fahrenheit and had a taste sensation of cool to cold. Cubed potatoes were 96.6 degrees Fahrenheit and had a taste sensation of cool. On 5/6/25 at 1:10 p.m., after the second lunch meal tray was tested, in an interview with the surveyor, the District Manager of Health Services Group, confirmed that the hot foods temped on 5/5/25 were not…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-05-22 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — patternHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record reviews and interviews the facility failed to respond to residents request for assistance in a manner that maintained or enhanced their dignity by not answering the call bells in a timely manner for 3 of 9 residents interviewed (Resident #18 [R18], R9, R4). In addition, the facility failed to provide morning bathing care for 1 of 1 sampled resident (R9) and facility failed to promote care for residents in a manner that maintains each resident's dignity and respect when staff failed to serve all residents seated at the same table at the same time for meal observations on 1 of 2 units (Homestead). Findings: 1. On 5/19/24, R18's clinical record was reviewed. R18 was diagnosed with Cerebral Vascular Accident (CVA) with hemiplegia and hemiparesis, wheelchair dependent, and the care plan indicated R18 requires extensive assist with toileting. On 5/19/24 at 10:35 a.m., in an interview with the surveyor, R18 stated he/she rang the call bell at around 10:00 a.m. because they had to move their bowels and needed the bedpan right away. R18 stated a half an hour had past and no…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-05-22 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and interview, the facility failed to adequately provide housekeeping and maintenance services necessary to maintain an environment free from offensive odors for 2 of 3 days of survey (5/19/24 through 5/21/24) and to maintain the building in good repair and in a sanitary condition for 1 of 1 environmental tour (5/21/24). Findings: On 5/19/24 at 10:30 a.m., a surveyor observed a strong, foul odor of urine in the corridor outside room [ROOM NUMBER]. On 5/19/24 at 10:45 a.m., in room [ROOM NUMBER]-1, in an interview with the surveyor, Resident #9 (R9) stated that almost every day a strong urine odor from the hall seeps into his/her room and is very unpleasant. On 5/19/24, between 10:30 a.m. and 1:15 p.m., a surveyor observed a lingering, strong, foul urine odor in the corridor outside room [ROOM NUMBER]. On 5/20/24 at 7:30 a.m., in the corridor outside room [ROOM NUMBER], the strong, foul odor of urine continued and was observed throughout the day until 2:00 p.m. when the observations were…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-05-22 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — patternProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to complete neurological assessments as directed, failed to follow physician orders for obtaining vital signs, referrals, medication administration, and failed to order urgent/stat diagnostic testing timely for 6 of 10 sampled residents (Resident #37 [R37], R24, R68, R168, R26, and R71). Findings: The facility's policy, Neurological Evaluation, revised 2/1/23, directed staff to completed a neurological evaluation when a resident sustains an injury to the head, or face, and/or has an unwitnessed fall. Evaluations will be performed every 15 minutes for 2 hours, then every 30 minutes for 2 hours, then every 60 minutes for 4 hours, and then every 8 hours until at least 72 hours as elapsed. 1. On 5/20/24, R37's clinical record was reviewed and included documentation that on 3/28/24 R37 was observed sitting on floor in-between the bed and nightstand and had a small bruise noted to forehead. On 5/20/24 at 10:18 a.m., during an interview with the Homestead Unit Manager, a surveyor confirmed that the Neurological Evaluation…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-05-22 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — patternProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to follow its own policy for oxygen use and humidification, failed to ensure physician orders were followed for oxygen administration, failed to ensure that oxygen tubing was changed weekly, and failed to ensure that respiratory equipment was maintained in a clean manner for 4 of 4 days of survey (5/19/24-5/22/24) for Resident #168 (R168). Findings: The facility's policy and procedure for Oxygen:Nasal Cannula, revised 8/7/23, indicated the following: - Verify order, -Determine if humidification is needed by using the table - 2 liters of oxygen per minute does not indicate the use for humidification, -Nasal cannula labeled with date of initial set-up, - If humidifier is used, label with date, - Replace disposable set-up every seven days, date and store in a treatment bag when not in use. R168 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The physician orders contained an order, dated 5/7/24, to administer oxygen at 2 liters per minute. The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-05-22 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — patternProvide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure sufficient direct care staff were scheduled and on duty to meet the needs of all 73 residents that reside on the Homestead and Riverview units. This has the potential to affect all residents that need assistance with Activities of Daily Living (ADL). Findings: 1. On 5/19/24, R18's clinical record was reviewed. R18 was diagnosed with a Cerebral Vascular Accident (CVA) with hemiplegia and hemiparesis, wheelchair dependent, and the care plan indicated R18 requires extensive assist with toileting. On 5/19/24 at 10:35 a.m., in an interview with the surveyor, R18 stated he/she rang the call bell at around 10:00 a.m. because they had to move their bowels and needed the bedpan right away. R18 stated a half an hour had past and no one has answered his/her call bell. R18 stated their anal area was on fire and it hurt. R18's call bell was observed being answered at 10:50 a.m., fifty minutes after R18 stated he/she turned the call bell on. 2. On 5/19/24, R9's clinical record was reviewed. R9 was diagnosed with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-05-22 · tag F0802 — failed to prepare enough nourishing food — patternProvide sufficient support personnel to safely and effectively carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations and interviews the facility failed to provide adequate dietary staff to ensure the dietary needs of residents were met timely for 3 of 4 days of survey (5/19/24, 5/20/24, and 5/21/24). Findings: Review of the posted meal times for Homestead dining room indicated breakfast is served at 8:00 a.m., lunch is served at 12:00 p.m., and dinner is served at 5:00 p.m. On 5/19/24 at 12:30 p.m., observation of lunch services in the Homestead dining room revealed residents in the dining room were served lunch one-half hour late. Meal trays were delivered to resident rooms up to 1:45 p.m., one and three quarter hours late. On 5/20/24 at 8:32 a.m., a surveyor observed breakfast trays arrived to the Homestead dining room one-half hour late. On 5/20/24 at 8:35 a.m., in an interview with surveyor, a resident stated, they are always late during the week, they are usually early on weekends. On 5/20/24 at 12:30 p.m., a surveyor observed lunch trays arriving to the Homestead dining room one-half hour late. On 5/21/24 at 8:32 a.m., a surveyor observed the breakfast trays arriving to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-05-22 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — patternEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interviews and observations, the facility failed to serve hot foods hot and cold food cold on 1 of 4 days of survey (5/21/24). Findings: On 5/19/24 at 11:36 a.m., during a resident interview they stated concerns regarding the temperature of meals. On 5/19/24 at 12:30 p.m., observation of lunch service revealed residents in the Homestead dining room were served one-half hour late. Meal trays were delivered to resident rooms up to 1:45 p.m., one and three quarter hours late. On 5/20/24 at 8:29 a.m., during a resident interview they stated meals are always late during the week, hot foods are not always hot. On 05/20/24 11:56 a.m., during a resident interview they stated the food is not always warm. On 5/21/24 at 12:55 p.m., two surveyors received test trays with American Chop Suey and Pineapple Crisp (cold dessert) with whipped topping. The temperature of the chop suey was 116.9 degrees Fahrenheit, and 116.8 degrees Fahrenheit. The temperature of the Pineapple Crisp for both trays was 66.8 degrees Fahrenheit. The hot and cold foods on the test trays were found not to be…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-05-22 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, and interviews, the facility failed to monitor food temperatures to prevent food borne illness prior to serving residents for 1 of 4 days of survey (5/19/24), failed to store, prepare, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety by not storing food in a sanitary manner for 2 of 4 days of survey (5/19/24, and 5/20/24) and failed to ensure that plumbing fixtures were properly installed to prevent backflow as required by the Maine State Plumbing Code on 4 of 4 days of survey (5/19/24, 5/20/24, 5/21/24, and 5/22/24). This has the potential to effect all residents in the facility. Findings: On 5/19/24 at 10:10 a.m., during the initial tour of the kitchen, a surveyor observed on the shelf and available for use in the dry storage: 1 package- Lays Classic chips, opened and undated. 1 package- white powder, open, unlabeled, and undated. The package was resting on the shelf with biscuit mix and pancake mix. Staff were unable to determined what was in the package.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-22 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolatedHonor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interviews, the facility failed to ensure that a resident's preference for a second serving of the main meal choice for lunch was available on 5/21/24, for 1 of 1 residents (Resident #37 [R37]) reviewed for weight loss and received an appetite stimulant. Finding: On 5/21/24 a during lunch meal service on Homestead Unit, a surveyor observed that chop suey and salad was part of the main menu choice for lunch. R37 requested seconds because he/she did not get enough. A surveyor observed Certified Nursing Assistant #6 (C.N.A.6) call down to the kitchen and reported to R37 that there wasn't any left. On 5/21/24 at 1:10 p.m., during an interview with surveyors, the Food Service Director (FSD) stated that they ran out of the main meal choice of chop suey and salad. It is the last day before our delivery tomorrow, so we ran out, usually I would run to the store to buy lettuce but I couldn't because I was working as staff. Sometimes we do not have enough of something at the end of a supply period. We have a lot of double portions, we are not compensated double…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-22 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to develop a care plan for the area Post Traumatic Stress Syndrome (PTSD) for 1 of 1 sampled resident with a diagnosis of PTSD (Resident #18 [R18]). Finding: On 5/21/24, a review of R18's care plan, under the care problem of 'Resident/patient exhibits or is at risk for distressed/fluctuating mood symptoms related to: depression, anxiety, PTSD.' There was no documented evidence of a care plan developed to address the issues of PTSD. On 5/22/24 at 9:55 a.m., in an interview with the surveyor, the Director of Nursing (DON) stated she did not find a care plan for PTSD other than it being mentioned as one of the problems under fluctuating mood symptoms in the care plan. The DON stated the Licensed Social Worker (LSW) told the DON an assessment of R18's PTSD was not done. The DON confirmed there was no care plan for PTSD.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-22 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record reviews, observation, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure that weekly pressure ulcer assessment documentation, used to monitor the healing progress of the wounds, were completed, failed to follow physician orders in obtaining a wound clinic referral, and failed to follow a care plan for 3 of 4 residents reviewed with pressure ulcers (Resident #15 [R15], R68, and R31). Findings: 1. On 5/22/24, R15 clinical record was reviewed. Pressure wound documentation for wound #7, left gluteus; #8 right gluteus; and #9 left gluteus, were reviewed with the Riverview Unit Manager. The Wound Evaluation documentation in the clinical record lacked evidence of weekly assessments/evaluations for the week of 3/31/24-4/6/24 and 4/28/24-5/4/24. On 5/22/24 at 10:01 a.m., in an interview with the Riverview Unit Manager, a surveyor confirmed weekly pressure ulcer wound evaluation assessment/measurements for R15 were not done for the week of 3/31/24-4/6/24, and 4/28/24-5/4/24. 2. On 5/21/24, R68's clinical record was reviewed and included a physician order, dated 10/31/23, for an…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-05-22 · tag F0699 — isolatedProvide care or services that was trauma informed and/or culturally competent.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to identify a resident's current diagnosis of Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD)/trauma to determine what trigger(s) might cause re-traumatization for 1 of 1 sampled resident reviewed with a current diagnosis of PTSD (Resident #18 [R18]). Finding: On 5/21/24, a review of R18's clinical record, in the Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0, Section I, Active Diagnoses, Psychiatric/Mood Disorder, I6100 was coded to indicate R18 had an active diagnosis for Post Traumatic Stress Syndrome (PTSD). The surveyor was unable to find information in the clinical record that indicated what R18's PTSD was caused by or what events might cause re-traumatization. On 5/22/24 at 9:55 a.m., in an interview with the surveyor, the Director of Nursing (DON) stated she did not find a care plan (goal and trauma interventions) for PTSD other than it being mentioned as one of the problems under fluctuating mood symptoms in the care plan. The DON confirmed the Licensed Social Worker (LSW) did not assess Resident #18's PTSD.
- Potential for harm · D2024-05-22 · tag F0711 — isolatedEnsure the resident's doctor reviews the resident's care, writes, signs and dates progress notes and orders, at each required visit.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to ensure the physician reviewed the resident's total program of care, which included signing orders for medications and treatments listed on the Physician Orders (block orders) in a timely manner for 1 of 8 sampled residents (Residents #15 [R15]). Finding: Documentation in R15's clinical record stated that the Physician signed the Physician Orders (block orders) on 2/12/24. These orders were in effect for 60 days. The next Physician Orders (block orders), including a 10-day grace period, needed review and the Physician's signature by 4/22/24. The medical record lacked evidence that Physician reviewed and signed orders on or around 4/22/24. Documentation in R15's clinical record stated that the Physician signed the Physician Orders (block orders) on 5/21/24, 29 days late, including the 10-day grace period. On 5/22/24 at 1:13 p.m. in an interview with the Senior Director of Nursing, a surveyor confirmed the above finding.
- Potential for harm · D2024-05-22 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to ensure opened insulin was labeled with an open date in 1 of 2 treatment carts (Homestead unit) and failed to remove expired medications from the supply available for use in 2 of 2 medication storage rooms (Homestead and Riverview units) Findings: On 5/19/24 at 11:16 a.m., a surveyor and a Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN1) observed a Basaglar KwikPen (Lantus) for Resident #35 that was in the treatment cart that did not have an open or discard date (Lantus is good for 28 days once opened and at room temperature). On 5/19/24 at 11:26 a.m. a surveyor and LPN1 observed the medication storage room on the Homestead Unit and found the following expired medications available for use: 2 bottles of Stool Softener 100 milligram with expiration date of 4/2024. On 5/19/24 at 11:32 a surveyor and LPN2 observed the medication storage room on the Riverview Unit and found the following expired medications: 2 bottles of Aspirin 325 milligram with an expiration date of 4/2024 These findings were confirmed by the surveyor at the time of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-05-22 · tag F0947 — failed to train nurse aides adequately — isolatedEnsure nurse aides have the skills they need to care for residents, and give nurse aides education in dementia care and abuse prevention.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on employee file reviews and interview, the facility failed to implement and maintain an effective training program which includes, at a minimum, training on abuse for 1 of 4 Certified Nursing Assistants (CNA) reviewed (CNA3). Finding: On 5/22/24, the following employee record was reviewed: CNA3 was hired on 1/29/24. There was no documented abuse training completed by CNA3 in the employee file. On 5/22/24 at 3:09 p.m., in an interview with the surveyor, the Director of Nursing confirmed that she was unable to locate documentation indicating CNA3 completed her abuse training.
- Potential for harm · D2024-03-28 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on facility policy review, facility reportable incident review and investigation with written statements, and interview, the facility failed to protect a resident from physical and mental abuse (intimidation) when a Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) grabbed Resident (R)4's foot/ankle when R4 attempted to kick CNA1 a second time, after making contact the first time. CNA1 held R4's foot/leg against the bed to stop R4 from kicking, only letting go after R4 said he/she wouldn't kick CNA1 again. The action of CNA1 grabbing R4's foot/ankle resulted in right ankle swelling, bruising, and mild pain to R4. Finding: On 7/11/23, the Division of Licensing and Certification (State Agency) received a fax from the facility, alleging that on 7/11/23 at 2:50 a.m., R4 kicked CNA1, attempted to kick CNA1 again, when CNA1 grabbed R4's right foot/leg to stop resident from kicking. CNA 1 was sent home pending investigation and the Medical Provider would see R4 in the morning. Immediate treatment to R4 was his/her right lower leg was elevated, ice applied, with 1 to 1 attention provided to R4 to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-28 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on facility policy review, facility's Reportable Incident Form, facility investigation, and interview, the facility failed to report an allegation of Abuse to Adult Protective Services (APS) and law enforcement for 1 of 1 investigated allegations of Abuse (7/11/23). Finding: The facility policy, Abuse Prohibition, last revised 10/24/22, indicated that staff are to report allegations to the appropriate state and local authority(s) involving neglect, exploitation, or mistreatment (including injuries of unknown source) suspected criminal activity, and misappropriation of patient property. The External Abuse Reporting Requirements table indicated reporting to Law Enforcement and Adult Protective Services (APS) was required with the responsible person being the Administator or Director of Nursing. The Division of Licensing and Certification (DLC) received the facility's Reportable Incident Form, dated 711/23, alleging that on 7/11/23 at 2:50 a.m., Resident (R)1 kicked Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA)1 in the groin and attempted to kick CNA1 again, when CNA1 grabbed R4's right…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-03-01 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — patternHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations and interviews the facility failed to promote care for residents in a manner that maintains each resident's dignity and respect when staff failed to serve all residents seated at the same table at the same time for 2 of 6 meals observed (2/26/32 Lunch, 2/27/23 Breakfast) Findings: On 2/26/23 on the Homestead unit during the lunch meal observation between 12:00 p.m. and 12:45 p.m., residents at the long table nearest the doors, 3 residents were served their meals and 2 residents sat watching their tablemates eat and being assisted with their lunch. At the table nearest the back wall there were 3 residents eating their lunch meal and 3 residents were waiting for their lunch meals to be served. In the bar area near the nursing station there were 6 residents sitting, 3 residents were eating their meals and 3 residents were waiting for their meals to be served. 2 residents voiced being hungry and wanting their lunch. One resident stated, this happens every day. On 2/27/23 between 8:00 a.m. and 8:38 a.m. during breakfast service on Homestead unit, 6 residents were…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-03-01 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — patternHonor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to ensure that residents were allowed to choose their preferences for beverages throughout the day for 2 of 4 days of survey (2/26/23 and 2/27/23) Findings: On 2/26/23 between 12:00 p.m. and 12:45 p.m. during lunch meal observation on the Homestead unit it was observed that no coffee was served with the lunch meal. On 2/27/23 at approximately 8:00 a.m. a resident requested a cup of coffee. Staff were asked to assist resident with his/her request for coffee. Staff then stated that he/she already had a cup of coffee. When staff was asked if residents were limited for coffee, she stated the residents get coffee with breakfast only. When asked why the limitation she stated that the kitchen only sends up so much coffee and that the kitchen does not send up coffee carafes to be able to make more coffee. On 2/27/23 at 8:15 a.m. during an anonymous staff interview, it was stated that drink choices and being able to offer coffee except during breakfast has stopped a long time ago. They stated it was because the kitchen didn't send up…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-03-01 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to adequately provide housekeeping and maintenance services necessary to maintain the building in good repair and in a sanitary condition on 2 of 2 unites (Riverside and Homestead) for 1 of 1 Environmental Tour. In addition, the facility failed to create a homelike dining experience for residents dining in the dining room and the bar area by serving their lunch and breakfast meals on a tray for 2 of 6 meals observed on the Homestead unit. Findings: On 3/01/23 from 1:52 p.m., to 2:00 p.m., two surveyors did an environmental tour with the facility Administrator, Maintenance Director, and Director of Housekeeping in which the following was observed: 1. Riverview Unit: - Cracked ceilings in Riverview entrance, and in Riverview hall near Activity room -[NAME] observed on the walls outside activity room - not cleanable surface -Water stain around ceiling speaker outside of employee staircase -Peeled wallpaper where wall meets ceiling, stained pulling apart from…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-03-01 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — patternProvide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure sufficient direct care staff were scheduled and on duty to meet the needs of residents that reside on the Riverview and Homestead Units. This has the potential to affect all residents needing assistance with Activities of Daily Living (ADL)'s. Findings: 1. Review of Facility Incident/Accident Report dated February 2023 revealed there were 17 falls, 5 resident to resident altercations and 6 injuries of unknown origin. During an interview on 2/26/23 at 11:13 a.m., Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA)7 indicated that on some weekends there are just 2 CNA's along with the med tech and the nurses do not help on the floor. During an interview on 2/26/23 at 11:30 a.m., CNA #6 indicated that staffing is really bad and quite often the nurse will have to cover the whole building during the evening shifts and when the residents with Alzheimer sundown [behaviors that begin in the evening] there is a lot going on and no one around to help. During an interview on 2/26/23 at 12:00 p.m., a Homestead family member…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-03-01 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record reviews, observations, and interviews, the facility failed to follow a written physician's order for heart rate parameters prior to administering a medication for 1 of 6 residents observed during medication administration (Resident #10). Findings: 1. On 2/11/23 during a clinical record review, the surveyor noted Resident #10 had a written physician's order dated 11/1/21 for Metoprolol Succinate ER Tablet Extended Release 24 Hour Give 100 mg (milligrams) by mouth one time a day for A-Fib (Atrial Fibrillation, irregular heart beat), HTN (hypertension, high blood pressure) HOLD FOR HR (heart rate) < (below) 60 BPM (beats per minute). 2. Upon review of Resident #10's electronic medical administration record (EMAR), there is no evidence that Resident #10 had his/her heart rate taken prior to administration of the medication Metoprolol on 2/28/23. On 2/23/23 at 8:11 a.m., in an interview with a surveyor, the Director of Nursing confirmed that Resident #10's heart rate was not taken before the administration of the medication Metoprolol, and the medication was given without…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-03-01 · tag F0809 — failed to serve meals on a reasonable schedule — isolatedEnsure meals and snacks are served at times in accordance with resident’s needs, preferences, and requests. Suitable and nourishing alternative meals and snacks must be provided for residents who want to eat at non-traditional times or outside of scheduled meal times.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on staff interviews and observations the facility failed to offer snacks to all residents on 1 of 2 units (Homestead Unit) Findings: During the recertification and complaint survey on 2/26/23 thru 3/1/23 through observations and during anonymous interviews with staff, the staff stated that on a regular basis there are no snacks to offer residents. The activity person will have snacks for them at times but if someone is hungry there is nothing to offer them. The staff denied having any sandwiches on the unit to offer the residents, the staff can call down to the kitchen but only if the kitchen is open, and by the time it comes up the resident has forgotten they are hungry. The staff stated that the residents with labeled snacks, (snacks that come from the kitchen with individual resident names), are the only ones that get snacks, and the snacks are passed by the Certified Medication Aide (C.N.A.-M), and it is usually a supplement shake. On 2/26/23 during Homestead unit observations it was observed by two surveyors that there were no snacks to offer the residents. Mother's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-03-01 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record reviews and interview the facility failed to ensure that clinical records were complete and contained accurate information for 1 of 3 sampled residents reviewed for Treatment Administration (Resident's #43). Findings: Resident #43 was admitted to facility on 5/28/19 with diagnoses to include dementia, major depressive disorder, adult failure to thrive, and is receiving end of life care. During an initial observation of Homestead kitchenette on 2/26/23 at 12:43 p.m. two surveyors observed 1 vanilla magic cup (dietary supplement) dated 2/25 for with Resident #43's name on it in refrigerator. At this time Certified Nursing Assistant #6 observed the magic cup, confirming it belonged to Resident #43 and should have been given to him/her yesterday 2/25/23. Review of Resident #43's provider orders active for February 2023 revealed order with start date of 5/10/21 states: other. Two times a day magic cup/nutritional treat appropriate for those on thickened liquids BID. Review of Resident #43's February 2023 Treatment Administration Record (TAR) revealed on 2/25/23 Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · Bcited before2025-12-09 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — patternSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure that a clinical record contained accurate and complete information for Resident #1 (R1) in the area of level of eating assistance provided for 14 of 24 meals documented between December 1 - 8, 2025. Finding:On 12/9/25, R1's clinical record was reviewed. The care plan included a FOCUS (dated 6/28/24) of: Resident requires/is dependent for Activities of Daily Living (ADL) and the INTERVENTION indicated that R1 was a total assist in the area of eating (last revised on 7/26/24).A surveyor reviewed the meal documentation for December 1st - 8th, 2025 and noted that 14 of the 24 meal opportunities reflected inaccurate or incomplete documentation based on the care plan focus/intervention as follows: (5) meals were blank, (2) meals were documented as supervision, (4) meals were documented as independent, (2) meals were documented as setup, and (1) meal was documented as substantial assist.On 12/9/25 at 1:50 p.m., during an interview with a surveyor, Certified Nursing Assistant stated that R1 was a total assist for eating.On…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · B2024-05-22 · tag F0623 — patternProvide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to notify the resident and/or resident representative in writing for the reason of a transfer/discharge from the facility, for 2 of 3 sampled residents reviewed for hospitalization (Resident #37 [R37], and R24). In addition, the facility failed to notify the Ombudsman of transfer/discharges since January 2024. Findings: 1. On 5/21/24, R37's clinical record was reviewed and indicated that the resident was transferred to the hospital on 3/8/24 and admitted to the hospital. The clinical record lacked evidence of a written transfer/discharge notice being provided to the resident/resident representative. On 5/21/24 at 10:22 a.m., during an interview with a surveyor, the Market Clinical Advisor stated she was unable to find evidence that a written transfer/discharge notice had been given to the resident and/or representative. 2. On 5/22/24, R24's clinical record was reviewed and indicated that the resident was transferred to the hospital on [DATE] and was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · B2024-05-22 · tag F0625 — patternNotify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to notify the resident and/or the resident's representative in writing of a bed hold notice after a transfer/admission to an acute care hospital for 3 of 4 sampled residents reviewed that were sent to the hospital (Resident #37 [R37], R24, and R71). Findings: 1. On 5/21/24, R37's clinical record was reviewed and indicated that the resident was transferred to the hospital on 3/8/24 and admitted to the hospital. The clinical record lacked evidence of a written bed hold notice being provided to the resident/resident representative. On 5/21/24 at 10:22 a.m., during an interview with a surveyor, the Market Clinical Advisor stated she was unable to find evidence that a written bed hold notice had been given to the resident and/or representative. 2. On 5/22/24, R24's clinical record was reviewed and indicated that the resident was transferred to the hospital on [DATE] and was admitted to the hospital. The clinical record lacked evidence of a written bed hold…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · Bcited before2024-05-22 · tag F0655 — patternCreate and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews and interview, the facility failed to provide the resident and/or their representative with a summary of the baseline care plan for 4 of 5 residents reviewed for baseline care plans (Resident #37 [R37], R168, R63, and R270). Findings: 1. On 5/19/24, R37's clinical record was reviewed which indicated R37 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. There was no evidence in R37's clinical record that a copy of the baseline care plan summary was provided to the resident or his/her representative. 2. On 5/21/24, R168's clinical record was reviewed which indicated R168 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. There was no evidence in R168's clinical record that a copy of the baseline care plan summary was provided to the resident or his/her representative. On 5/21/24 between 10:25 a.m. and 10:31 a.m., during interviews with a surveyor, the Riverview Unit Manager she stated that during the care plan meetings, she currently does not and did not provide a copy of the baseline care plan to the resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · B2024-05-22 · tag F0730 — patternObserve each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on review of annual evaluations and interview, the facility failed to complete an annual performance evaluation for nurse aides at least every 12 months for 2 of 4 sampled Certified Nurse Assistants (CNA) employed greater than a year (CNA1, and CNA2). Findings: On 5/22/24 surveyors reviewed the employee files: 1. CNA1 was hired on 2/1/20. There was no evidence that an annual performance evaluation was completed by 2/1/24. On 5/22/24 at 2:00 p.m., in an interview with the surveyor, the Director of Nursing (DON) stated she was unable to find any annual performance evaluations completed after 2022. She confirmed that CNA1 had not had an annual performance evaluation. 2. CNA2 was hired on 8/14/17. There was no evidence that an annual performance evaluation was completed by 8/14/23. On 5/22/24 at 2:00 p.m., in an interview with the surveyor, the DON stated she was unable to find any annual performance evaluations completed after 2022. She confirmed that CNA2 had not had an annual performance evaluation.
- No harm found · B2024-05-22 · tag F0732 — patternPost nurse staffing information every day.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observations and interview, the facility failed to post the nurse staffing information in a prominent place, readily accessible and visible to all residents, for 3 of 4 days of survey (5/19/24, 5/20/24, 5/21/24). Finding: On 5/19/24 through 5/21/24, surveyors observed that the nurse staffing information was not posted in a prominent place readily accessible and visible to residents. Surveyors observed the staff posting placed on a table in a room between the entrance door to the facility and an exit door out of the this room to the outdoors. This entrance door to this area was noted to be locked at times and staff had to use a code to allow visitors in or out of the building; a resident would have to be able to exit the entrance door in order to observe the posting that was placed on a table. On 5/21/24 at 3:00 p.m., during an interview with the Director of Nursing, a surveyor confirmed that the staff posting was not accessible to residents for reviewing.
- No harm found · Bcited before2023-03-01 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — patternDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to update/implement goals and interventions in the area of behaviors when a resident was observed wandering into rooms and pushing other resdients in wheelchairs without their consent for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for care plans (Resident #27). Findings: Resident #27 was admitted to facility on 5/20/22 with diagnoses to include dementia and major depressive disorder and resides on a locked unit for safety. During 5 observations between 2/26/23 at 11:04 a.m. and 2/27/27 at 2:45 p.m., Resident #27 was observed self-propelling in a wheelchair, wandering in residents' rooms and attempting to push other residents in their wheelchairs without their consent. During 2 of 4 days of survey Resident #27 was in 2 residents to resident altercations. Review of Resident #27's clinical record revealed nursing note dated 2/24/2023 states, Mental Health/Behavior reviewed. Physical behaviors, directed towards others occurs up to 5 days a week. Verbal behaviors, directed towards others occurs up to 5 days a week. Wandering occurs daily or…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$10,358 in federal fines across 1 penalty.
- $10,358 — penalty dated 2025-05-07
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to GENESIS HEALTHCARE — 184 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 2 of 5 | 2.4 | -0.4 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 2 of 5 | 2.3 | -0.3 vs chain |
| Staffing | 3 of 5 | 2.5 | +0.5 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 2 of 5 | 3.5 | -1.5 vs chain |
The other 183 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.4★, per CMS)
Showing 40 of 183; lowest-rated first.
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GENESIS HEALTHCARE OF MAINE LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 100% | since 10/02/2012 |
| FC-GEN OPERATIONS INVESTMENT LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 03/01/2015 |
| GEN OPERATIONS I LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 04/01/2011 |
| GEN OPERATIONS II LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 04/01/2011 |
| GENESIS HEALTHCARE INC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 02/02/2015 |
| GENESIS HEALTHCARE LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 02/02/2015 |
| GENESIS HOLDINGS LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 02/02/2015 |
| GHC HOLDINGS LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 12/31/2010 |
| SUN HEALTHCARE GROUP INC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 11/15/2022 |
| WHITMAN, ARNOLD | Individual | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 11/15/2022 |
| BERG, MICHAEL | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 12/01/2012 |
| BRIDGEFORD, LAURA | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 06/01/2024 |
| MENDELSON, AVI | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 06/01/2024 |
| PAZARA, CHELSEA | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 02/26/2025 |
| YNTEMA, LAURIE | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 02/26/2025 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 17 rows in the source record cover these 15 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
9 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $1.2M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 12% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in ME
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Maine Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 205031. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-05-07, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.