No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Cedar Ridge Center

23 Cedar Ridge Drive, Skowhegan, ME 04976 · For profit - Corporation · 75 certified beds · (207) 474-9686 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (207) 474-9686 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse-prevention, restraint, or reporting citation — no harm found (F0605) — cited Apr 2026Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0758)
Insights

This home’s record is mixed — some reassuring signs, some worth asking about.

In its favor
  • a middle-of-the-pack inspection score (3/5)
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0605) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (44) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (2/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

3/5
CMS overall
3 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 3 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 3 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 2 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★ 2/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
46 Fairview Ave # 221 · (207) 474-6945 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
Walgreens1.0 mi
225 Madison Ave · (207) 474-2525 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
121 North Ave · (207) 474-3121 · Call to confirm hours
Park
419 Water St · Typically dawn to dusk

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 2 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 1 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 3 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating2★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased32.1%24.4%15.4%worse
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight8.7%5.2%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder1.7%1.1%0.9%worse
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection7.2%2.2%2.0%worse
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms30.7%11.6%6.5%check this — see note marked dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.0%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury3.3%4.1%3.3%typical
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened35.9%25.6%16.1%worse
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication14.4%17.4%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine94.3%95.5%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers4.6%4.3%4.7%typical
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control31.7%29.2%21.2%worse
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table13.6%20.2%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication1.3%1.2%1.4%typical
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine57.4%74.5%79.4%worse
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission16.6%20.8%22.6%better
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit22.5%16.1%12.0%worse
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days0.961.451.67better
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days3.032.011.80worse

This value is several times the typical-state benchmark. It can be real, or it can be a coding artifact in what the facility submitted. Weigh it against the inspection record above.

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

60.5% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 157 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

60.5%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
9.2%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
34.1%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.38U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.15hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.18hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.05hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 34.1% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 82 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.38 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 65% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 29% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF60.5%CMS range 52.2–67.151.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024better than U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF9.2%CMS range 6.2–13.210.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge34.1%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge37.8%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge34.1%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified98.3%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting93.3%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge89.5%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay4.3%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened3.5%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization6.2%CMS range 3.4–10.27.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.061.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

1.05
RN hours/ resident / day
0.32
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.11
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.48
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.77
RN hoursweekends
47.1%
Total nursing turnover
36.8%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 75 beds and averages 69.6 residents a day — about 93% occupied, or roughly 5 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.480 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 1.05 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.11 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.19 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.60 on weekdays — 11% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.16 to 0.77 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 47% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

8
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-04-16)
13
at the previous standard inspection (2025-01-30)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

44 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 34 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-04-16 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to provide a safe, functional, and sanitary environment for 2 of 4 days of survey (4/13/26 and 4/14/26). Findings: 1.On 4/13/26 at 12:15 p.m., during an observation of the Blue Spruce unit (C unit) the surveyor observed the ice machine on the counter in the kitchenette area. The air gap was not visible; the Maintenance Director stated the air gap was in the secured doors of the cabinet. The Maintenance Director removed the screws from the doors, and it was noted that the air gap was improper (see F812) at this time an observation of the interior of the cabinet was made and it was noted that the bottom of the cabinet was warped exposing the edges of the wood panel and an area on the back left corner of the cabinet was caved in. This area was noted to have a dark substance on the edges of the exposed panel. At the time of this observation the above finding was confirmed by the surveyor with the Maintenance Director. 2.On 4/13/25 at 12:25…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-04-16 · tag F0711 — pattern
    Ensure the resident's doctor reviews the resident's care, writes, signs and dates progress notes and orders, at each required visit.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to ensure that during the regulatory visit, the Provider reviewed the resident's total program of care, which included signing orders for medications and treatments listed on the physician block orders for 5 of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications (Residents #7 [R7]), R59, R5, R14, R33). Findings: 1. On 4/16/26, a review of R7's clinical record was completed. Documentation indicated a required regulatory visit was conducted on 2/24/26 a provider progress note was completed on 2/24/26, but there was no evidence that the physician block order was signed. The facility was unable to provide evidence that the physician block order was signed on the day of the 2/24/26 required regulatory visit. 2. On 4/16/26, a review of R59's clinical record was completed. Documentation indicated a required regulatory visit was conducted on 2/26/26. A provider progress note was completed on 2/26/26, but there was no evidence that the physician block order was signed. The facility was unable to provide evidence that the physician…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-04-16 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interviews, the facility failed to ensure that plumbing fixtures were properly installed to prevent backflow as required by the Maine State Plumbing Code for 1 of 4 days of survey (4/13/26). In addition, the facility failed to prepare food under sanitary conditions for 1 of 4 days of survey (4/14/26).Findings: 1.On 4/13/26 at 12:15 p.m. during a unit observation tour on the Blue Spruce unit (C unit) the kitchenette had an ice machine on the counter, the air gap was not visible. The Maintenance Director was asked to show the air gap to the ice machine, which was located under the sink, the cupboard doors were secured shut with screws. When the Maintenance Director unscrewed the doors, it was observed that the air gap to the ice machine was less than the 1 inch required.This direct connection of wastewater and potable water was in violation of the 10-114 State of Maine Rules Chapter 226, definition Section A, which defines an Air-Gap Separation - A physical separation between the free-flowing discharge end of a potable water supply pipeline and an open or…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-04-16 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to maintain an infection control program to help prevent the spread of infection related to pressure ulcer treatment for 1 of 2 residents observed for a pressure ulcer dressing change (Resident #55 [R55].On 4/13/26, a review of R55's clinical record was completed. Documentation indicated R55 has a Stage 3 pressure ulcer on the left heel. Documentation in the physician orders indicated that the pressure ulcer treatment is to cleanse the wound with wound cleanser, apply a medihoney dressing to the wound bed and cover with a foam border once a day and as needed. On 4/14/26 at 6:50 a.m., a pressure ulcer dressing change observation was completed with RN1 performing the dressing change.Initially RN1 donned clean gloves, and set up a clean work field at the foot of the bed. RN1 placed the wound cleanser bottle on the soiled linen and medihoney dressing and foam cover on clean work field. RN1 went back to treatment cart and with the same clean gloves touched the cart with both gloved hands, took the keys from the cart,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-04-16 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interviews, review of the facility's filed grievances, and record review, the facility failed to implement parts of its Grievance/Concern policy and procedure for 1 of 2 residents that filed grievances (Resident #44 [R44]).Finding: On 4/13/26 at 10:50 a.m., in an interview with a surveyor, R44 voiced concern that they had filed a few grievances in the past couple of months and no one from management has talked to them about the outcome of their grievances. R44 stated that they do attend resident council meetings most of the time and they did discuss one of the grievances regarding snacks, but no one saw the resident in person to discuss it. On 4/15/26, a review of the facility's Grievance Binder was completed. In the Grievance Binder were four grievance forms filed by R44. The grievances are as follows:A. On 1/15/26, the scalloped potatoes were hard on the evening of 1/14/26.Documentation indicated that the corrective action was the Administrator stated quality control is done prior to meals leaving kitchen.B. On 1/16/26, did not receive evening medications until 11…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-04-16 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolated
    Prevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to ensure an as needed (PRN) psychotropic medication was ordered for 14-days or less unless there is a practitioner's rationale for PRN use beyond 14-days for 1 of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications (Resident #59 [R59]).Findings: Review of R59's clinical record, on the physician order summary for medications states, Lorazepam (used to treat anxiety) give 0.5 mg (milligrams) by mouth every 8 hours as needed for anxiety for 6 months, with an order start date 11/24/25 and order end date 5/24/26. There was no evidence in the clinical record of a practitioner rationale for the extended use of the psychotropic PRN order beyond 14-days. On 4/16/26 at 11:28 a.m. in an interview with the Director of Nursing (DON), a surveyor confirmed that R59's clinical record lacked evidence of practitioner's rationale for extended use of 6 months for the PRN Lorazepam order. The DON stated upon her review of R59's clinical record she couldn't find a practitioner rationale for the extended use either.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-04-16 · tag F0644 — isolated
    Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure that the State mental health authority for Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) was notified after a resident was newly diagnosed and/or experienced symptoms related to a mental disorder or trauma event to determine if a change in level of service was required for 1 of 2 sampled residents reviewed for PASRR (Resident #1 [R1]).Finding:On 4/14/26, R1's clinical record was reviewed. R1's PASRR, completed on 12/24/25, did not require a level II determination due to his/her clinical record did not show that he/she had a serious mental illness. On 9/2/25, R1 was diagnosed with bipolar disorder, but the clinical record lacked evidence that the resident was referred to the State mental health authority for a new PASRR determination.On 4/14/26 at 1:35 p.m., during an interview with a surveyor, the Licensed Social Worker stated a new PASRR was not submitted for R1 with the diagnosis of bipolar disorder. At this time a surveyor confirmed the facility failed to refer R1 for a PASRR after a new diagnosis and/or…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-16 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on clinical record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to ensure physician orders were followed for blood pressure parameters prior to administering a medication for 1 of 5 resident's reviewed for unnecessary medications (Resident #7 [R7]) and failed to follow physician's orders by holding a medication that was ordered for 1 of 5 resident's reviewed for unnecessary medications (R59). Findings: 1.On 4/15/26 during a clinical record review the surveyor noted R7 had an order dated 9/9/25 for Carvedilol (medication that works by relaxing blood vessels and slowing the heart rate) 3.125 milligrams (mg) by mouth every morning and at bedtime for hypertension (high blood pressure) with directions to take with food and to hold Carvedilol for systolic blood pressure (SBP) below 100 and to hold Carvedilol for diastolic blood pressure (DBP) below 60. Upon review of R7's electronic medical administration record (EMAR) there is no evidence that R7's SBP or DBP was monitored prior to receiving his/her scheduled Carvedilol for the months of March 2026 and April 2026. During a review of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-06-03 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — pattern
    Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    10. On 6/3/25 at 10:00 a.m., in an interview with a surveyor, Resident #10 stated that he/she had asked to use the bedpan at approximately 2:10 am this morning. They came and put me on it and I rang again when I was finished. No one came until 7 or 8 o'clock this morning. I ended up taking it out and it fell off the bed when I moved. The nurse was the one who found it. On 6/3/25 at 1:20 p.m., in an interview with a surveyor, the RN confirmed that he/she had found Resident #10's bedpan spilled on the floor and had to clean it up. He/she stated there had been no CNA from 6 a.m. to 8 a.m. on the unit and he/she was doing both jobs as the CNA and the nurse on the Blue Spruce unit. On 6/3/25 at 1:30 p.m., the finding was discussed with the Director of Nursing. Based on record reviews, interviews, and facility staffing schedules review, the facility failed to ensure sufficient direct care staff were scheduled and on duty to meet the needs of residents that reside in the facility. This has the potential to affect all residents needing assistance with Activities of Daily Living (ADL's).…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-06-03 · tag F0621 — isolated
    Treat residents equally regarding transfer, discharge, and provision of services for all residents, regardless of payment source
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure equal access to services, including assistance with alternative placement, when the payor source changed from Medicare Part A to private pay for 1 of 1 residents reviewed for discharge. Findings: A review of the clinical record for R9 reveals he/she was admitted to skilled nursing services in May, 2023. On 9/24/24, the facility provided notice of Medicare non-coverage (NOMNC) to R9's health care power of attorney (POA) informing that skilled services would be ending on 9/26/24. On 11/12/24, a Medical Eligibility Determination Assessment was completed which found R9 was not medically eligible for nursing home level of care. Section Y of the assessment indicated R9 would be entering residential care. A review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0, dated 11/29/24 revealed a BIMS (brief interview for mental status) score of 13, indicating R9 was cognitively intact. Section Q of the MDS - Participation in Assessment and Goal Setting, revealed R9 and the family participated and that no active discharge plan was in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 34 citations
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-01-30 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure that a care plan was developed in the area of Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder(PTSD)/trauma for 3 of 4 sampled residents reviewed for PTSD. (#1, #5, #51) Findings: 1. Resident #1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include PTSD. Review of Resident #1's clinical record on 1/28/25 revealed it lacked documented evidence that the current care plan had been developed and implemented in the area of PTSD to include goals, interventions and triggers. 2. Resident #5 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include PTSD. Review of Resident #5's clinical record on 1/28/25 revealed it lacked documented evidence that the current care plan had been developed and implemented in the area of PTSD to include goals, interventions and triggers. 3. Resident #51 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of the residents medical record indicates he/she has a diagnosis of Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD).…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-01-30 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — pattern
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to maintain respiratory equipment in a sanitary manner to help prevent the development and transmission of disease and infection related to respiratory care for 3 of 4 days of survey. (1/27/25, 1/28/25 and 1/29/25) Findings: 1. On 1/27/25 at 6:15 p.m. a surveyor observed on the Blue Spruce Unit a portable oxygen machine and nasal canula and tubing on the floor next to the exit door. On 1/27/25 at 6:15 p.m., in an interview, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN #1) confirmed that the portable oxygen machine, the nasal canula and the tubing should not be on the floor and that it should be bagged and stored off the floor. On 1/27/25 at 6:30 p.m., in an interview, Registered Nurse (RN#1) confirmed that the portable oxygen machine, the nasal canula and the tubing was and should not have be on the floor and went on to say that no resident was using it at that point. 2. On 1/27/25 at 6:20 p.m., a surveyor observed oxygen tubing and a nasal canula hanging on the left…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-01-30 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — pattern
    Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure sufficient direct care staff were scheduled and on duty to meet the needs of residents that reside in the facility. This has the potential to affect all residents needing assistance with Activities of Daily Living (ADL's). Findings: Review of Payroll Based Journal staffing report revealed the facility triggered for low weekend staffing during the fourth quarter of 2024 (July 1 - September 30). On 1/28/25 at 3:30 p.m., in an interview with a surveyor and review of weekend staffing for July 1, 2024, through September 30, 2024, the Administrator confirmed the facility did not have enough staff to meet resident needs on the weekends. On 1/28/25 at 10:58 a.m., in an interview with a surveyor, Resident #327 stated on one day during the previous weekend, I had to pee myself, had to wait 30 minutes after using the call bell, due to lack of staff. When in bed Resident #327 stated compression devices are applied to both legs and he/she can't stand up without assistance due to dizziness. Resident #327 stated they need more…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-01-30 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — pattern
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observations and interviews the facility failed to establish a system of records of receipt and disposition of all controlled drugs in sufficient detail to enable an accurate reconciliation, failed to ensure that two people who are authorized to administer medications signed the Shift Count page indicating that they counted all controlled substances at the change of shift for multiple shifts, on 4 of 4 units reviewed (Hickory, Elm, Blue Spruce and Scotch Pine) and failed to maintain adequate pharmaceutical services to ensure the receipt and administration of physician ordered medication was available to meet the needs of a resident requiring intravenous antibiotics (Resident #329). Findings: A review of the facility's Controlled Medication Storage policy and procedure dated: 1/24, under #6 states: At each shift change or when keys are surrendered, a physical inventory of all controlled substances, including refrigerated items, is conducted by two licensed nurses or approved individuals…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-01-30 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews, and facility policy, the facility failed to ensure the kitchen was maintained in a clean and sanitary manner. Additionally, the facility failed to ensure foods were sealed, labeled, and dated in a dry storage room, a walk-in freezer and a walk-in refrigerator, as well as failed to ensure the emergency food supply was not stored with unsecured chemicals for 1 of 3 days of survey (1/27/25). Furthermore, the facility failed to ensure that the Dish Machine temperatures, Refrigerator temperatures, and Freezer temperatures were monitored for 3 of 3 months reviewed. Findings: Review of policy, Food Storage: Cold Foods, revised 4/2018, states, Procedures .5. All foods will be stored wrapped or in covered containers, labeled and dated . Review of policy, Food Storage: Dry Goods, revised 9/2017 states, Storage areas will be neat, arranged for easy identification, and date marked as appropriate .Toxic materials will not be stored with food . 1. On 1/27/25 between 6:10 p.m. and 6:40 p.m., a surveyor conducted a kitchen tour with Dietary Aide (DA) #1, during…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-01-30 · tag F0847 — pattern
    Inform resident or representatives choice to enter into binding arbitration agreement and right to refuse.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure the terms and conditions of a binding arbitration agreement were clearly communicated to the residents or their representatives for 4 of 5 residents reviewed for Arbitration (Resident #35, #46, #57, #331). Findings: On 1/27/25 at 7:28 p.m., a surveyor conducted an entrance conference with the Administrator and the Director of Nursing and was told, when asked, that no residents in the facility had signed an arbitration agreement. 1. Review of Resident #35's medical record shows he/she was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Further review of the resident medical record indicates he/she had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of 15 of 15, indicating he/she is cognitively intact. On 1/30/25 at 3:50 p.m., a surveyor met with Resident #35 and asked if he/she signed an arbitration agreement with the facility during admission. He/she stated that he/she did not know what that was and stated that his/her child signed admission paperwork for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-01-30 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, record reviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases for residents requiring Enhanced Barrier Precautions (Residents #327 and #331) on 1 of 5 facility units. Findings: 1. On 1/28/25 at 10:40 a.m., in an observation on the Elm House unit, a surveyor briefly reviewed the electronic record for Resident #327 before entering the room. The record indicated Resident #327, admitted on [DATE], required Enhanced Barrier Precautions for CRE (Carbapenemase-producing carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae), a drug-resistant organism. The surveyor could find no signage at the entrance of the room, or within the resident's room indicating precautions were necessary. The surveyor asked the Registered Nurse on duty if Resident #327 required special precautions. The RN at first stated the resident did not require precautions, then remembered…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-30 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to provide care to residents in a manner that maintains each resident's dignity by failing to serve all residents seated at the same table at the same time for 1 of 2 dining observations on 1 of 1 days of survey. Finding: Review of the facility's Resident Council Meeting Minutes, dated 12/31/24, revealed resident concerns that residents are concerned that trays are being served in rooms on units before the dining room service . Resident Council Meeting Minutes , dated 11/27/24 states, Dining Services .Trays in order of room on carts .Nursing: Tray served in dinning [dining] room first by table before room trays . Resident Council Meeting Minutes, dated 10/30/24 states, CNA's [Certified Nursing Assistants] are not serving residents at the table in the dining room first . On 1/28/25 between 12:23 p.m. and 12:40 p.m., during a dining observation on the Hickory Unit, a surveyor observed a table seating 3 residents. At 12:29 p.m., Resident #60 received his/her meal. Staff then proceeded to deliver meals to other…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-01-30 · tag F0559 — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to share a room with spouse or roommate of choice and receive written notice before a change is made.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interviews the facility failed to appropriately notify a resident and or resident representative in a timely manor, prior to changing a residents room, for 1 of 1 residents reviewed for room change. On 1/21/25 the Division of Licensing and Certification received a complaint in regards to a resident's room being changed without proper notification. On 1/27/25 at 8:00 p.m., during an interview Resident #57 and his/her family member both stated that they had not received any notification of a room change prior to it occurring. Review of Resident #57's clinical record indicates that the resident was moved from Elm Unit to Hickory Unit on 1/15/25. Further review of the clinical record lacked evidence that any notification of the room change occurred. On 1/30/25 at 2:31 p.m., during an interview with the Market Clinical Advisor the above information was confirmed.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-30 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to review, revise and update a care plan in the area of Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) for 1 of 4 residents whose care plans were reviewed for PTSD. (#18) Finding: Resident #18 was admitted the facility on 12/23/21. On 4/14/23, the resident was identified/diagnosed with Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD). Review of Resident #18's clinical record revealed the current care plan was not reviewed, revised and updated to include goals, interventions or triggers for PTSD. On 1/30/25 at 12:47 p.m. in an interview, the Market Clinical Advisor confirmed that the Resident 18's care plan was not reviewed, revised and updated to include goals, interventions or triggers for PTSD.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-01-30 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview, and facility policy, the facility failed to demonstrate evidence of behavior monitoring and monitoring for side effects of psychotropic medications for 1 of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications (#26). Finding: Facility policy, Medication Management, dated 1/2024, states, Policy . Evaluation of a resident's physical, behavioral, mental, psychosocial signs and symptoms .including adverse consequences of medications . The need for and response to therapy are monitored and documented in the resident's medical record .Guidelines for Psychotropic Medication Monitoring .Potential Adverse Consequences: The facility assures residents are being adequately monitored for adverse consequences . Resident #36 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses to include anxiety and depression. Resident #36's care plan, initiated 12/17/24, states, .at risk for complications related to the use of psychotropic drugs . complete behavior monitoring flow sheet .monitor for side effects . Review of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-01-30 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to adequately date and properly dispose of open biologicals according to manufacturer specifications in 1 of 4 units observed for medication storage. (Scotch Pine House) Findings: 1. On [DATE] at 9:51 a.m., observation of Scotch Pine House treatment cart with the Registered Nurse (RN) the following was observed; one opened Aspart Insulin Flex Pen dated 12/22 and one opened and undated Insulin Glargine-yfgn Solution Pen with both with the manufacture's instructions of, after first use .discard after 28 days. At this time, the RN removed both of the insulin pens and confirmed they were either expired or undated.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-15 · tag F0655 — isolated
    Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, record review, and facility policy, the facility failed to ensure a baseline care plan was developed and implemented within 48 hours that included the instructions needed to provide minimum healthcare information necessary to care for 1 of 3 residents reviewed during a complaint investigation (Resident #1). Finding: Review of policy, OPS416 Person-Centered Care Plan, dated 10/24/22, states .The Center must develop and implement a baseline person-centered care plan within 48 hours of admission/readmission for each patient/resident that includes the instructions needed to provide effective and person-centered care that meet professional standards of quality care .1. A baseline care plan must be developed within 48 hours and include the minimum healthcare information necessary to properly care for a patient including, but not limited to: initial goals based on admission orders; physician orders; dietary orders; therapy services; social services; PASRR recommendation, if applicable . Review of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-15 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure that clinical records were complete and contained accurate information for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for wounds (Resident #1). Finding: Review of facility policy, Skin Integrity and Wound Management, dated 10/15/24, states, Practice Standards .6. The licensed nurse will .6.2 Document any newly identified skin/wound impairments .6.7 Notify interdisciplinary team members for a comprehensive approach to care including prevention and wound treatments .9. Notify physician/APP to obtain orders . Resident #1 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses to include Deep Tissue Injury on coccyx. Review of Resident #1's Wound Evaluation, dated 12/11/24, revealed Resident #1 had a Deep Tissue Injury located on his/her coccyx that was present on admission. Further review of the Wound Evaluation revealed, Treatment .Cleansing solution: soap & water .Primary dressing: no dressing applied . Review of Resident #1's Wound Evaluation, dated 12/18/24, revealed the coccyx…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-09-03 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — pattern
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility policy review, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure that a resident's drug regimen was free from unnecessary drugs by administering excessive doses of Ativan in less than 7 hours and failed to monitor of psychotropic medication side effects for 1 of 9 sampled residents (#7). Findings: The facility's policy, Behaviors: Management of Symptoms, revised on 7/1/24 states, Staff will use non-pharmacological interventions as the first line of approach to managing challenging behaviors. The facility's policy, Medication Monitoring dated 1/24 under Guidelines For Psychotropic Medication Monitoring states, When monitoring a resident receiving psychotropic medications, the facility must evaluate the effectiveness of the medications as well as look for potential adverse consequences and under section Chemical Restraints states, When any medication restricts the resident's movement or cognition, or sedates or subdues the resident, and is not an accepted standard of practices for a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-09-03 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on the facility's Falls Management policy, interviews and record review the facility failed to ensure that a resident's physician and/or representative were notified immediately of an unwitnessed fall and failed to follow its own policy and procedure for unwitnessed falls for 1 of 9 residents reviewed for falls. (#1) Findings: Cedar Ridge's Falls Management Policy and Procedure, revised 3/15/24 states under, 5. Post-Fall Management: 5.1 Evaluate the patient for injury. 5.1.1 First aid will be provided for minor cuts and abrasions. 5.2 Notify the physician / advanced practice provider (APP) of the fall, report physical findings and extent of injuries, and obtain orders if indicated. 5.2.1 If the injury is of an emergent nature, the patient will be transported to the hospital. 5.2.2 If the extent of injuries cannot be determined, the nurse will notify emergency medical services (EMS) for evaluation and transport to the hospital. 5.4 The patients representative will be notified of the fall and any follow up treatment needed. On 9/3/24 at 3:35 p.m., in an interview, Resident #1's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-03 · tag F0655 — isolated
    Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a baseline care plan was developed and implemented within 48 hours that included the instructions needed to provide minimum healthcare information necessary to properly care for 1 of 9 residents reviewed. (#7) Finding: 1. Resident #7 was admitted to the facility 8/5/24 with diagnosis of cardiovascular accident with left side hemiparesis requiring anticoagulant treatment, dysarthria with modified diet texture, thrombocytopenia, depression, anxiety with ordered antianxiety medications and neurogenic bladder with indwelling supra-pubic catheter. On 9/3/24 resident #7's clinical record was reviewed and revealed that it lacked evidence of a base line care plan that included the instructions necessary to properly care for Resident #7's immediate health and safety needs for the use of an anticoagulant and antianxiety. In addition, a care plan for Activities of Daily Living, impaired swallowing, cognitive loss, chronic pain, indwelling supra- pubic catheter and risk of falls were not initiated until 8/13/24, eight days…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-03 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure that a care plan was followed for a 2 assist transfer for 1 of 4 sampled residents requiring a mechanical device use for a transfer and failed to ensure the care plan was accurate to reflect the residents advanced directive code status. (Resident #7) Findings: 1. On 8/30/24 at 9:24 a.m. during an interview with Resident #7's representative, [he/she] stated Resident #7 fell on 8/7/24 due to only one staff assisting (him/her) during a transfer when there should have been 2 staff. Review of Resident #7's medical record contained an e-Interact note dated 8/7/24 stating, The resident in [room] had a fall today. The CNA (Certified Nurses Aide) was helping the resident to transfer to the commode. While standing pivoting to the commode, (he/she) lost (his/her) balance. And The CNA tried to catch the resident but the resident was moving too fast and ended up on the floor. The Nurse went to [room] and saw the resident was on the floor and the CNA tried…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-03 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview, observation and record review, the facility failed to revise the care plan to reflect a resident's current status for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for infection prevention and control (#1). Findings: On 9/3/24, review of Resident #1's electronic medical record, on the front page stated, Infection Prevention and Control Covid 19(Coronavirus) Onset Date 8/24/2024 Infection Status Confirmed (D) Isolation Precautions Airborne, Contact Isolation Start Date 8/24/2024 - Expected End Date 9/4/2024 PPE Requirements - Gloves, Gown, N95 Respirator, Eye Protection (Face Shield or Goggles) On 9/3/24 at 9:00 a.m., a surveyor observed signage on the Resident #1's room door which stated Airborne and contact precautions N95 mask, a gown, a face shield, and gloves. There was a wheeled cart outside the residence door with personal protective equipment in it. Review of Resident #1's current care plan lacked evidence of updating and revised to reflect the current status of the resident. On 9/3/24 at 10:20 a.m., in an interview, the Director of Nursing confirmed that Resident #1's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-03 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on facility policy, observations, record reviews, and interviews, the facility failed to provide a sanitary environment to help prevent the development and transmission of disease and infection related to oxygen and nebulizer use for 2 of 2 residents reviewed for respiratory care. (Resident #4 and #6) Findings: The facilities procedure on Nebulizer: Small Volume last revised on 11/1/2023, section 21 states to rinse small volume nebulizer, mouthpiece, and T piece with sterile water and dry. In subsection 21.1 the procedure states to place in treatment bag labeled with patient name and date. Subsection 21.2 the procedure then states to replace and date the setup daily, if used. The facilities Oxygen Nasal Cannula procedure dated 8/7/23 instructs nursing to, replace disposable set-up every seven days. Date and store cannula in treatment bag when not in use. 1. On 9/4/2024 at 9:00 a.m., observation of Resident #4's unlabeled nebulizer tubing and mouthpiece stored on bedside table with other personal belongings. No treatment bag was observed in the resident's room. Review of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-03 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on record review and observation, the facility failed to ensure the Treatment Administration Record (TAR) was accurately documented for changing of oxygen tubing for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for oxygen use (#6). Finding: On 9/3/24 at 9:08 a.m., and at 11:06 a.m., a surveyor observed Resident #6 using Oxygen (O2), via nasal cannula with the tubing dated for Sunday 8/25/24 and the filter located on the back of the concentrator coated with a layer of dust. Review of the residents TAR, nursing documented the oxygen tubing was changed and the filter was cleaned on 9/1/24. On 9/3/24 at 12:07 p.m., both the surveyor and the registered Nurse (RN) #2 observed resident #6's O2 tubing dated 8/25/24 and the filter coated with dust. RN #2 stated the tubing should be changed on Sunday nights. On 9/3/24 at 12:12 p.m., during an interview, the above was discussed with the Director of Nursing

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-03 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, interviews and observations the facility failed maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 1 of 1 day of survey. Findings: On 9/3/24 at 9:00 a.m., two surveyors observed signage on Resident #1's bedroom door which stated, contact and airborne precautions. N95 mask, a gown, a face shield, and gloves needed when entering room. There was a wheeled cart outside the resident's door with personal protective equipment in it. On 9/3/24 at 9:10 a.m., in an interview, when asked by a surveyor what precautions were needed to enter Resident #1's room, the Registered Nurse (RN #1) stated that resident #1 is on contact and airborne precautions and a N95 mask, a gown, a face shield, and gloves were needed. On 9/3/24 at 9:13 a.m., two surveyors observed two Certified Nursing Assistants (CNA #2 and CNA #3) go in to Resident #1's room, without donning a N95 mask, a gown, a face shield and gloves. When…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-09-03 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — isolated
    Keep all essential equipment working safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interviews, the facility failed to ensure that a resident's bed was maintained in good repair and safe operating condition for 2 of 2 observations for 1 of 1 day of survey. (9/3/24) Findings: On 9/3/24 at 3:35 p.m., in an interview with Resident #1's representative [RR], [he/she] stated that the bed rail had been broken for a long time and it was stuck in the up position. Resident #1s representative demonstrated to the surveyor that the side rail would not function properly on the right side of the bed as you're looking at it from the foot of the bed. The surveyor observed [RR] trying to put the railing down and it would not go down as it was stuck in the up position. The [RR] then went around to the other side of the bed and easily put down the left side rail. [RR] stated [RR] had reported this to the nursing staff many times over the past few weeks and no one had done anything about it. On 9/3/24 at 4:20 p.m., in an interview, Certified Nursing Assistant/Medication Tech(CNA/M) told the surveyor that when the ambulance brought Resident #1 back to the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-08 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observations and interviews the facility failed to promote care for resident in a manner that maintains the resident's dignity by allowing an uncovered urine filled Foley catheter bag to be seen by passersby for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #9) observed for dignity related to urinary collection bags during 1 of 2 days of survey (5/7/24). Findings: On 5/7/24 at 9:20 a.m., a surveyor observed Resident #9's Foley catheter bag hanging on the side of the bed, containing yellow urine, visible from the hallway/dining room. At this time, Resident #9 indicated he/she would like to have it covered and would be embarrassed if people could see it from the hallway/dining area. On 5/7/24 at 9:30 a.m., in an interview, Registered Nurse (RN)3 confirmed that Resident #9's Foley catheter bag with urine was visible to passersby in the hallway/dining room. On 5/8/24 at 8:15 a.m., in an interview, the surveyor discussed the finding with the Administrator.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-05-08 · tag F0554 — isolated
    Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interview, record review, and facility policy the facility failed to complete a Self-Administration of Medication Assessment for 1 of 4 resident reviewed for medication administration. (Resident #1) Findings: Review of facility policy titled NSG309 Medications: Self Administration last reviewed 3/1/22 states Patients who request to self-administer medications will be evaluated for safe and clinically appropriate capability based on the patient's functionality and health condition. If it is determined that the patient is able to self- administer: A physician/advanced practice provider (APP) order is required. Self-administration and medication self-storage must be care planned. Resident#1 was initially admitted [DATE] with diagnoses including hypertension, peripheral vascular disease, renal disease, and arthritis. Review of annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of 11 of 15, indicating he/she has mild/moderately impaired cognition.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-08 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to update/implement goals and interventions for 3 of 9 care plans reviewed (Resident #1, #4 and #6). Findings: Review of facility policy Person-Centered Care Plan dated 10/24/22 states A comprehensive person-centered care plan must be developed for each patient .Included measurable objectives and timetables to meet a patient's medical, nursing, and mental and psychosocial needs . 1. Review of Resident#1's active medication orders dated May 2024 revealed order with start date of 11/6/23 for Venlafaxine HCl ER Tablet Extended Release 24 Hour 75 MG Give 1 tablet by mouth one time a day for depression, Review of Resident#1's entire clinical record lacked evidence for monitoring side effects. Review of Resident#1's Care Plan dated 4/5/24 states [Resident #] is at risk for complications related to the use of psychotropic drugs for depression. [Resident #] will have the smallest most effective dose without side effects by next review . Monitor for side effects…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-08 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to review and revise the care plan by an interdisciplinary team (IDT) that included, to the extent possible, participation of the resident and/or his/her representative after each assessment for 1 of 2 sampled residents (Resident #6). Findings: Review of facility policy Person-Centered Care Plan dated 10/24/22 states . a comprehensive, individualized care plan will be developed after each assessment .and review and revise the care plan after each assessment. After each assessment means after each .Minimum Data Set (MDS). The care plan will be prepared by the interdisciplinary teams . In conjunction with the patient/and or patient representative During review of Resident 6's medical record, the surveyor noted quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessments dated 1/23/24. The clinical record lacked evidence that a care plan meeting was held by the Interdisciplinary Team (IDT), resident and/or representative for this assessment. In addition, the last documented IDT meeting was held on 10/23/23. During an interview on 5/8/24 at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-08 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to monitor and document targeted behaviors to support the use of an antipsychotic and antianxiety medication for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications (Resident #6). Findings: Review of facility policy Psychotropic Medication Use dated 10/24/22 states .Facility staff should monitor the resident's behavior pursuant to Facility policy using a behavioral monitoring chart or behavioral assessment record for residents receiving psychotropic medication with agitated or psychotic behavior(s). Facility staff should monitor behavioral triggers, episodes, and symptoms. Facility staff should document the number and/or intensity of symptoms and the resident's response to staff interventions . Review of Resident #6's care plan initiated 4/2/21 states [Resident #6] exhibits physical and verbal behaviors .Ineffective coping skills, i. e., poor anger management, Poor impulse control. removes [his/ her] colostomy appliance and throws it at times.will not harm others by next review (became agitated . and struck other resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-06-15 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to adequately provide housekeeping and maintenance services necessary to maintain the building in good repair and in a sanitary condition on 3 of 5 Units (Elm, Blue Spruce, and [NAME]) for 1 of 1 Environmental Tour. Findings: On 6/15/22 from 8:25 a.m. to 8:50 a.m., an Environmental Tour was conducted with the Administrator, the Center Nurse Executive, and the Maintenance Director in which the following findings were observed: Elm House - Resident room [ROOM NUMBER] - The wall was gouged and had chipped/missing paint behind Bed-A recliner. Both window screens on Bed-A side were broken and in disrepair. - Resident room [ROOM NUMBER] - The wall along the side of Bed-A was gouged and had chipped/missing paint. Bed-A bedrail had a broken tab on it and had chipped/missing paint. Blue Spruce House - Resident room [ROOM NUMBER] - The wall fan was dusty/dirty. The bureau had chipped/missing laminate on the entire front creating an uncleanable surface. - Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-06-15 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to ensure the kitchen was maintained in a clean and sanitary manner for a food mixer, a food slicer, ceiling vents, and ceiling tiles. Additionally, the facility also failed to date, label and/or seal foods in the dry storage area, the reach-in refrigerator, the walk-in refrigerator and the walk-in freezer. Findings: On 6/12/22 from 11:10 a.m. to 11:40 a.m., a kitchen tour was conducted in which the following findings were observed by the surveyor and discussed with the Head Cook. Kitchen - The food mixer had food particles on the mix arm and the base. - The food slicer had food particles on the blade and blade guard. - The 2 ceiling vents and the 2 ceiling tiles they were mounted in, above food preparations areas, were dusty/dirty. - The dry storage area had an opened bag of biscuit mix, an opened bag of cake mix, a large bowl of biscuits, and an opened bag of coconut that were not labeled and dated. - The reach-in refrigerator had a drink cup full of liquid that was not labeled and dated. - The walk-in refrigerator had a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-06-15 · tag F0660 — isolated
    Plan the resident's discharge to meet the resident's goals and needs.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to develop a discharge plan that focused on resident discharge goals, preparation, and effective transition of care for 3 of 24 sampled residents (Resident #64, #71, and #375). Findings: 1. During review of Resident #64's medical record, the surveyor noted that the resident's current care plan, revised 2/24/22, had no discharge plan. On 6/15/22 at 9:00 a.m., during an interview with the Center Nurse Executive (CNE), a surveyor confirmed this finding. 2. During review of Resident #71's medical record, the surveyor noted that the resident's current care plan, created on 2/23/22; revised 4/5/22, had no discharge plan. On 6/15/22 at 9:32 a.m., during an interview with the Clinical Quality Specialist , a surveyor confirmed this finding. 3. During review of Resident #375's medical record, the surveyor noted that the resident's current care plan, revised 11/16/2021, had no discharge plan. On 6/15/22 at 9:04 a.m., during an interview with the Center Nurse Executive (CNE), a surveyor confirmed this finding.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-06-15 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review and interviews the facility failed to ensure that Oxygen was administered according to physician's orders for 2 of 2 days (#20). Finding: During a medical record review, Resident #20 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. A review of Resident #20 physician's orders dated 5/11/22 indicated Oxygen at 2 liters per minute (LPM) via Nasal Cannula continuously for Chronic Respiratory Failure. On 6/12/22 at 12:30 p.m., and on 6/13/22 at 9:40 a.m., it was observed that Resident #20's Flowmeter on the Oxygen Concentrator was set at 3.5 LPM delivering a continuous flow of oxygen at 3.5 LPM. At the time of observation on 6/13/22 at 9:40 a.m., Resident #20 stated he/she was to receive oxygen at 2 LPM. The surveyor discussed this finding in an interview on 6/13/22 at 10:09 a.m. with the Center Nurse Executive (CNE). At approximately 10:20 a.m. the Clinical Quality Specialist acknowledged the physician's order should have been changed to 3.5 LPM.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-06-15 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — isolated
    Dispose of garbage and refuse properly.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interviews, the facility failed to maintain garbage storage areas in a sanitary condition to prevent the harborage and feeding of pests for 1 of 3 dumpsters for 1 of 4 days of survey. (6/12/22) Findings: On 6/12/22 at 11:10 a.m., 1 of 3 dumpsters by the kitchen was observed to have the left side door open exposing trash. Additionally, there were used face masks, paper products and trash debris on the ground around the dumpsters. On 6/12/22 at 11:40 a.m., in an interview, the findings were discussed with the Head Cook. On 6/12/22 at 1:00 p.m., in an interview, the findings were discussed with the Food Service Director.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · B2025-01-30 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility policy review, record reviews, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure that the resident and/or resident representative was provided with written information, concerning the right to accept or refuse medical or surgical treatment and/or formulate an advanced directive, was completed for 8 of 16 residents reviewed for advanced directives. (Resident #5, #61, #27, #51, #26, #31, #474 and #325). Findings: Review of facility policy Health Care Decision Making revision date 1/8/24 states It is the right of all patients/residents to participate in their own health care decision making, including the right to decide whether they wish to request, accept, refuse, or discontinued treatment, and to formulate or not formulate an advance directive. Centers Must: inform and provide written information to all patients concerning their right to refuse medical or surgical treatment and, at the patient's option, formulate an advance directive. Provide a written description of the facility's policies to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to GENESIS HEALTHCARE — 184 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 3 of 52.4+0.6 vs chain
Health inspection 3 of 52.3+0.7 vs chain
Staffing 3 of 52.5+0.5 vs chain
Quality measures 2 of 53.5-1.5 vs chain
The other 183 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.4★, per CMS)
1 of 5Alexandria Care CenterLos Angeles, CA 1 of 5Bay Crest Care CenterTorrance, CA 1 of 5Bethlehem North Skilled Nursing And RehabilitationBethlehem, PA 1 of 5Bethlehem South Skilled Nursing And RehabilitationBethlehem, PA 1 of 5Bridgeville Rehabilitation & Care CenterBridgeville, PA 1 of 5Brightwood CenterFollansbee, WV 1 of 5Carlisle Skilled Nursing And Rehabilitation CenterCarlisle, PA 1 of 5Casa De Oro CenterLas Cruces, NM 1 of 5Devonshire Care CenterHemet, CA 1 of 5Gettysburg CenterGettysburg, PA 1 of 5Glenwood CenterFlorence, AL 1 of 5Heritage CenterHuntington, WV 1 of 5Hidden Valley CenterOak Hill, WV 1 of 5Inners Creek Skilled Nursing And Rehabilitation CeDallastown, PA 1 of 5Jersey Shore Skilled Nursing And Rehabilitation CeJersey Shore, PA 1 of 5Kingston Court Skilled Nursing And RehabilitationYork, PA 1 of 5Las Palomas CenterAlbuquerque, NM 1 of 5Lebanon Center, Genesis HealthCareLebanon, NH 1 of 5Lebanon Skilled Nursing And Rehabilitation CenterLebanon, PA 1 of 5Linden Grove Health Care CenterPuyallup, WA 1 of 5Magnolia RidgeGardendale, AL 1 of 5Marmet CenterMarmet, WV 1 of 5Meridian CenterHigh Point, NC 1 of 5Merry Wood LodgeElmore, AL 1 of 5Mount Olive CenterMount Olive, NC 1 of 5Mountain Ridge Center, Genesis HealthCareFranklin, NH 1 of 5Oak Grove CenterWaterville, ME 1 of 5Oceanside Skilled Nursing And RehabilitationHampton, NH 1 of 5Orchard Park Health Care & Rehab CenterTacoma, WA 1 of 5Parkersburg CenterParkersburg, WV 1 of 5Pembroke CenterPembroke, NC 1 of 5Pine LodgeBeckley, WV 1 of 5Playa Del Rey CenterPlaya del Rey, CA 1 of 5Pocahontas CenterMarlinton, WV 1 of 5Pottstown Skilled Nursing and Rehabilitation CentePottstown, PA 1 of 5Putnam CenterHurricane, WV 1 of 5Ridgewood CenterRidgewood, NJ 1 of 5Rio Rancho CenterRio Rancho, NM 1 of 5River City CenterDecatur, AL 1 of 5River Ridge CenterKennebunk, ME

Showing 40 of 183; lowest-rated first.

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
GENESIS HEALTHCARE OF MAINE LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST100%since 10/02/2012
FC-GEN OPERATIONS INVESTMENT LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 02/02/2015
GEN OPERATIONS I LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 04/01/2011
GEN OPERATIONS II LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 04/01/2011
GENESIS HEALTHCARE INCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 02/02/2015
GENESIS HEALTHCARE LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 04/01/2011
GENESIS HOLDINGS LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 02/02/2015
GHC HOLDINGS LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 08/01/2008
SUN HEALTHCARE GROUP INCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 02/02/2015
WHITMAN, ARNOLDIndividual5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 02/02/2015
BERG, MICHAELIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; CORPORATE OFFICERsince 12/01/2012
BRIDGEFORD, LAURAIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; CORPORATE OFFICERsince 05/01/2019
MENDELSON, AVIIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 06/01/2024
GAGNE, CHRISTINAIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 03/01/2024
MORRIS, DIANEIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; INDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNF; ADP OF THE SNFsince 12/23/2023
YNTEMA, LAURIEIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 03/01/2024

CMS files one row per role, so the 22 rows in the source record cover these 16 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

9 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$9.4M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
+2.7%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$1.1M
Related-party expense12% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 62%Medicare 15%Other / private 23%

This home reported $1.1M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 12% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$364per resident / day
operating cost
$11,074per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$374per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in ME

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Maine Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Maine
$13,976/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$14,904/mo
Nursing home (private)
$8,205/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 205060. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-04-16, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next