Springbrook Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

53.7% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 216 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 60.2% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 118 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.38 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 65% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 33% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 123 beds and averages 115.2 residents a day — about 94% occupied, or roughly 8 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.79 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 1.24 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.27 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.49 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.91 on weekdays — 11% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.40 to 0.85 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 34% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

This trend is not current. The most recent of these two inspections was over 2 years ago; the arrow describes what inspectors found then, not what the home is like now.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

30 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 18 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · Gcited before2025-10-28 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure that sling straps were properly connected to a hanger bar before transferring a resident using an electric mechanical lift. This resulted in a resident falling from the lift sling onto floor during the transfer from bed to wheelchair and sustaining fractured ribs, lacerated spleen, and a fractured left arm, for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for falls with major injury (#1).Findings:On 10/27/25, the Division of Licensing and Certification received a report from the facility stating on 10/25/25 a nurse was preparing medications in front of R1's room when he/she heard a loud sound and upon turning around, R1 was found lying face down on the floor. Staff reported that the resident fell from the total lift during transfer from bed to wheelchair. When the resident was turned onto his/her back, it was observed that one of the sling loops had come off the lift hook, resulting in the fall. The nurse's assessment revealed a contusion of the left forehead and bleeding from the nose. R1 complained of pain and limited range of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Actual harm · G2025-05-12 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
  Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on the complaint intake form, clinical record reviews, interviews, and facility policy, the facility failed to identify the appropriate resident when passing medications resulting the CNA-M admisistering medications to the incorrect resident that resulted in a resident being transported to an Acute Care Emergency Department and later admitted to the hospital critical care unit for monitoring and treatment of low blood pressure. (Resident #1) Findings: The Division of Licensing and Certification received an Adult Protective Services (APS) complaint that indicated on 5/8/25, at 9:20 a.m., Resident #1 received another resident's medications which resulted in a hypotensive episode. Resident #1 was transported to the emergency room and subsequently admitted to the critical care unit (CCU). A review of nursing documentation dated 5/8/25 at 9:33 a.m., stated, [Med tech] approached me [Nurse] and stated that she gave the meds of [room [ROOM NUMBER]B to room [ROOM NUMBER]A]. On assessment, patient appears to be…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-10-28 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, and interviews the facility failed to implement the care plan interventions for 1 of 7 residents reviewed for transfers using a mechanical lift. (Resident #7) Findings: Resident #7's Minimum Data Set 3.0, quarterly assessment dated [DATE], section GG functional abilities and goals revealed he/she was dependent on staff and required full assistance with transfers. The most recent Lift Transfer evaluation completed on 11/4/25 indicated the residents weight was 195 pounds and required a purple (medium) sling for use with the electric mechanical lift. The care plan and the corresponding Kardex (used by the Certified Nursing Assistant) revised on 11/7/25 include the nursing interventions of Provide resident/patient with dependent assist of 2 for transfers using a mechanical lift with medium (purple) full body sling based on manufacturers guide and nursing assessment. On 11/20/25 at 8:50 a.m., observation of Resident #7 in his/her wheelchair with a green (large) sling underneath…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-10-28 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
  Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to revise a care plan to reflect the correct size sling used for transfers with a mechanical lift for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for falls with major injury (#1).Findings:On 10/28/25, R1's clinical record was reviewed. The record indicated R1 was admitted to the facility in November, 2020. Diagnoses included: dementia, obesity, lymphedema, dorsalgia, muscle weakness, rheumatoid arthritis, limited mobility, and other morbidities. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0, Quarterly Assessment, dated 10/17/25, Section GG. Functional Abilities and Goals, revealed R1 was dependent on staff and required full assistance with bed mobility, transfers, and toileting.The care plan and corresponding Kardex (used by Certified Nursing Assistants), revised on 8/5/25, included the intervention to provide R1 with assist of 2 (staff), using a mechanical lift and a green full body sling for all transfers. Review of the Lift-Transfer Evaluation for R1, dated 9/18/25, indicated R1's weight was 239.2 pounds, and the height was 60 inches. The assessment…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-07-31 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure that sterile technique was maintained during a pressure ulcer dressing change for 1 of 1 residents observed. (Resident #1) On 7/31/25 at 10:57 a.m., LPN #1 was observed performing a dressing change on Resident #1's stage 4 sacrococcygeal pressure ulcer with tunneling. After cleansing the wound, LPN #1 retrieved a piece of silver alginate dressing that had been resting on the outer wrapper of the product packaging, a surface that is not sterile, and inserted it into the tunneling wound using a sterile cotton-tipped applicator. At that time, the surveyor intervened and asked whether the outer surface of the packaging was sterile. LPN #1 acknowledged that it was not and agreed that this action could have contaminated the dressing. Physician's orders dated 7/22/25 directed daily cleansing Vashe solution, drying, and application of silver alginate to the wound bed.The facilities policy titled Wound Dressings - Aseptic Technique includes the following directive: Step 17: Open dressing(s) without contaminating. Keep the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-07-19 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and interview, the facility failed to adequately provide housekeeping and maintenance services necessary to maintain the building in good repair and sanitary conditions on 4 of 7 units (Wayside, Mayflower, Saccarappa and King), the clean utility room, the 3rd floor common area for 1 of 1 Environmental tours. Findings: 1. On 7/19/24 from 10:15 a.m. to 10:45 a.m., a surveyor conducted an environmental tour with the Administrator in which the following findings were observed and confirmed: Wayside Unit: -Resident room [ROOM NUMBER] - the bathroom walls were observed to be gouged, and/or water damaged with sheetrock exposed around the toilet. -Resident room [ROOM NUMBER]- The bathroom wall had water damage. The floor had dirt/debris around the base of the toilet. Saccarappa Unit: -Resident room [ROOM NUMBER] - the entrance door had a missing piece from the door. -Resident room [ROOM NUMBER] - the area under the window sill was open to the outside. Mayflower Unit: -Resident room [ROOM NUMBER]-…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-07-19 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to develop care plans in the area of oxygen therapy for 4 of 5 residents reviewed for respiratory care (#17, #56, #72 and #310). In addition, the facility failed to implement a care plan in the area of Activities of Daily Living (ADL), nutrition and incontinence for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for ADL's (#53). Findings: 1. On 7/15/24 at 9:30 a.m., a surveyor observed oxygen equipment at Resident #17's bedside. A Review of Resident #17's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) found orders dated 4/8/24 for Oxygen therapy and Continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) therapy. A review of Resident #17's care plan failed to include a focus, goal or intervention in the area of oxygen or CPAP therapy. 2. On 7/15/24 at 9:35 a.m,. a surveyor reviewed Resident #56's EMR showed orders dated 7/17/24 for oxygen therapy. A review of Resident #56's care plan did not include a focus, goal or intervention in the area of oxygen therapy. 3. On 7/15/24 at 9:45 a.m., a surveyor observed Resident #72 with a nasal cannula for oxygen…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-07-19 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — pattern
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record reviews, observations and interviews the facility failed to provide Activities of Daily Living (ADL) care in the area of showers/bathing for 1 of 33 residents reviewed (#18), and in the area of nutrition for 1 of 2 sampled residents during 2 of 5 days of survey. (#53). Findings: 1. On 7/15/24 at 11:44 a.m., in an interview with a surveyor, Resident #18 stated a couple weeks ago (she) did not get her weekly shower, due on Sundays, for 2 weeks until her family said something to staff. A review of the clinical record for Resident #18 revealed diagnoses that included multiple sclerosis and an above the knee amputation of the left leg. The quarterly Minimum Data Set 3.0 (MDS) assessment, completed on 7/6/24, indicated Resident #18 required partial to moderate assistance for showering/bathing. The current care plan stated Resident #18 required extensive 1-person assistance for bathing, and a total mechanical lift, with 2-person assistance to transfer to a shower. A review of Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) documentation noted Resident #18 received one shower in the month…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-07-19 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on facility policy, record reviews, observations and interviews, the facility failed to maintain and implement an infection control program to help prevent the development and transmission of disease and infection related to Multidrug-Resistant Organisms (MDRO's) colonized in sputum and wound care for a 2 of 2 sampled residents (Resident #48 and #79) for 1 of 1 day of survey (9/23/24). This has the potential to affect all 21 residents on the Wayside Gardens unit. Findings: Facilities procedure for Enhanced Barrier Precautions, revised 5/1/24 states, all patients with any of the following: Infection or colonization with a targeted MDRO (Multidrug-resistant organisms) . and Chronic wounds and/or indwelling medical devices (e.g. central line, urinary catheter, enteral feeding tube, tracheostomy, or ventilator) regardless of MDRO colonization status. PPE (Personal protective Equipment) used for these situations during high contact patient cared activities: device care or use .tracheostomy, wound care; any skin opening requiring a dressing, and PPE required, Gown, gloves prior to…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-19 · tag F0557 — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to be treated with respect and dignity and to retain and use personal possessions.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  Based on observation and interviews, the facility failed to ensure that a resident was treated with dignity and respect for 1 of 19 residents reviewed. (Resident #419) Finding: On 9/23/2024 at 10:15 a.m., upon entrance to Saccarappa house, a surveyor observed the shower room door wide open, exposing a naked resident, sitting on a shower chair actively showering him/herself. A Certified Nurses Aid and a Registered Nurse were observed on the other side of the unit. Approx 1 min later, the Occupational Therapist (OT) came from the far end of the unit with a face cloth and a bottle. The Surveyor asked why the door was left open, the OT stated, I didn't mean to and entered the shower room and closed the door. At 10:29 a.m., both the resident and the OT exited the shower room. At this time, the above was confirmed with the OT. On 9/23/24 at approx. 10:45 a.m., the above was discussed with the Administrator

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-19 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on policy review, clinical record review, observations and interviews, the facility failed to notify the provider and obtained orders for 1 of 6 residents reviewed for respiratory care (#33) and 1 of 6 residents reviewed for pressure ulcers (#48). In addition, the facility failed to assess a resident after an unwitnessed fall and complete neurological assessments as per facility policy for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for falls (#407). 1. On 7/15/24 at 11:05 a.m., a surveyor observed Resident #33 asleep in his/her bed on the Wayside Unit. The surveyor observed oxygen delivered at 3.5 liters/minute via nasal cannula with 2 oxygen tubes connected to the wall unit and only 1 tube connected to Resident #33. At 11:14 a.m., the surveyor discussed with the charge nurse that the oxygen was running but one tube was not connected to the resident. The charge nurse stated the extra tube was to be used with the nebulizer and then proceeded to turn that oxygen tube off. Resident #33 awoke and asked what the oxygen was set at. The charge nurse stated 3.5 liters. Resident #33 asked for the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-07-19 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — isolated
  Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure that staff maintained the appropriate competency and skill required to provide tracheostomy care for 1 of 2 residents with tracheostomies on the Wayside Unit (#48). Finding: On 7/15/24 at 10:47 a.m., a surveyor observed a personal protective equipment station and signage advising Enhanced Barrier Precautions were required at the entrance of Resident #48's room The surveyor observed Resident #48 lying in bed, receiving oxygen via a tracheostomy. A review of Resident #48's clinical record revealed diagnoses including anoxic brain injury, seizure disorder, chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia, and developmental delay. The record revealed a history of drug resistant organisms in Resident #48's sputum: Methicillin Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus (MRSA) and Pseudomonas Aeruginosa. The quarterly Minimum Data Assessment (MDS) 3.0, completed 6/11/24, indicated Resident #48 is dependent upon staff for all ADLs and is nonverbal, requires suctioning, has a tracheostomy and receives oxygen. The current care…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$17,388 in federal fines across 2 penalties. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.

• $9,110 — penalty dated 2025-10-28
• $8,278 — penalty dated 2025-05-12
• Medicare payment denial — starting 2025-11-20 for 19 days

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to GENESIS HEALTHCARE — 184 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 19 rows in the source record cover these 16 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

9 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $2.7M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 18% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in ME