Novi Lakes Health Campus

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

64.5% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 352 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 71.1% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 159 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.68 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 91% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 25% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 54 beds and averages 50.8 residents a day — about 94% occupied, or roughly 3 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.18 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 1.12 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.76 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.60 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.41 on weekdays — 18% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.36 to 0.52 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 39% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

20 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 9 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · Gcited before2023-05-04 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to identify and assess/monitor a change in condition timely for one (R99) of two resident reviewed for diarrhea/condition change, resulting in a resident who exhibited increased fatigue, decreased participation in therapy, loose stools, and increased confusion to be transferred to the hospital initiated by a family member and the resident being admitted to the hospital with critically low sodium levels. Findings include: On 5/2/23 at 9:35 AM, R99 was observed lying in bed. At that time, R99 was asked about the care in the facility. R99 reported they had not been feeling well lately and they had diarrhea that was causing bad pain in their stomach. R99 began moaning in pain and stated, Hold on. I have to go again. R99 was observed to grimace, moan, and place a pillow on her head. R99 was not able to answer any further questions at that time and requested to resume the interview later. At 9:43 AM, R99 was heard from the hallway yelling out in…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-18 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  This citation pertains to intake #MI00153247. Based on interview and record review the facility failed to administer blood pressure medications per physician's orders for one resident, (R901) of one resident reviewed for medication administration. Findings include: On 6/18/25 at 8:30 AM, a review of R901's closed clinical record revealed they re-admitted to the facility after a hospital stay on 5/7/25 with diagnoses that included: chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, hypertensive heart disease with heart failure, chronic kidney disease, diabetes, and anxiety disorder. A review of R901's physician's orders and medication administration record (MAR) for May 2025 was conducted and revealed an order for metoprolol (a blood pressure medication) 25 milligrams to be given daily between 6 AM and 10 AM. The order contained, Special Instructions that read, HOLD FOR SBP (systolic blood pressure) LESS THAN 110 OR HR (heart rate) LESS THAN 60. R901's MAR indicated indicated the medication had been given on 5/8/25 with a documented blood pressure of 101/56, and on 5/11/25 with a documented…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-05-08 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to store food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. This deficient practice has the potential to result in food borne illness among all residents that consume food from the kitchen. Findings include: On 5/6/25 during an initial observation of the kitchen between 7:10 AM-7:40 AM, the following items were observed with the Dining Services Assistant (Staff 'B'): The top loading/reach-in ice cream cooler did not have an internal thermometer and had visible thick build-up of ice around the top perimeter of the inside wall (near the top sliding doors about 8 inches in depth. Four of the six large cardboard containers of ice cream had a sticker with a use by date of 6/4, but the lids were not fitted properly and exposed the ice cream which was observed to have a darker colored top layer of ice cream covering. Staff 'B' reported the ice cream freezer was not hooked up to their electronic temperature monitoring via the iPad as the other walk-in/reach-in coolers and freezers were and should…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-05-08 · tag F0711 — pattern
  Ensure the resident's doctor reviews the resident's care, writes, signs and dates progress notes and orders, at each required visit.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure Physician/Physician Extender progress notes were entered into the clinical record in a timely manner for four residents (R#'s 13, 29, 138, and 37 ) of four resident's reviewed for Physician/Physician Extender progress notes. Findings include: R13 On 5/7/25 at 10:00 AM, a review of R13's clinical record revealed a note entered into the record by Nurse Practitioner (NP) 'I' on 3/30/25 for an acute care visit for pain management that occurred on 2/26/25. R29 On 5/7/25 at 10:08 AM, a review of R29's clinical record revealed the following: A note entered into the record by NP 'I' on 3/28/25 for an acute care visit that occurred on 2/25/25. A note entered into the record by NP 'I' on 2/19/25 for an acute care visit that occurred on 1/29/25. A note entered into the record by NP 'I' on 2/4/25 for an acute care visit that occurred on 1/13/25. R138 On 5/7/25 at 9:10 AM, a review of R138's clinical record revealed they admitted to the facility on [DATE]…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-05-08 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — pattern
  Dispose of garbage and refuse properly.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain the exterior dumpster area in a clean manner. This deficient practice had the potential to affect all residents, staff and visitors. Findings include: On 5/6/25 at 11:45 AM, during an observation of the garbage/refuse area with the Director of Food Services (DFS), there was an accumulation of trash and leaf debris around and behind the two dumpsters. Additionally, one of the two dumpsters was unable to be closed properly due to a large wooden object that prevented the lid from closing. When asked how often garbage was picked up, the DFS reported daily. When asked who was responsible for maintaining the surrounding area, they reported that was between Dietary staff and Maintenance. On 5/6/25 at 11:52 AM, an interview was conducted with the Maintenance Director (Staff 'G'). When informed of the observation with DFS, they reported they were aware there was some debris on the ground behind the dumpsters which was mostly leaves. They were informed that there was much more than leaves, including gloves and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-05-08 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure appropriate infection control practices during medication administration for one (R88) of three residents observed. Findings include: On 5/6/25 at 7:48 AM, Nurse 'C' was requested to observe medication pass with R88. Nurse 'C' reported they had just obtained the resident's vital signs and began retrieving medication from the medication cart. Nurse 'C' was not observed using hand sanitizer, or washing their hands after opening the medication drawers, touching the water pitcher, or using the laptop to review the medications. On 5/6/25 at 7:55 AM, while Nurse 'C' poured out the medication from the pre-packaged plastic packets into a small clear plastic cup, one of the pills fell onto the top of the medication cart. Nurse 'C' picked the pill up with their bare hands and placed the pill into the plastic cup and proceeded to administer the medication to R88. Nurse 'C' was not observed to use hand sanitizer until after the med pass was completed (not after opening of the med cart drawers, touching the water…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-05-08 · tag F0678 — failed to provide CPR when needed — isolated
  Provide basic life support, including CPR, prior to the arrival of emergency medical personnel , subject to physician orders and the resident’s advance directives.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to obtain a resident's code status in a timely manner for two residents, (R#'s 138 and 139) who were their own responsible parties, of two resident's reviewed for code status, resulting in the potential for end of life wishes not being met. Findings include: R138 On [DATE] at 11:06 AM, a review of R138's clinical record revealed they admitted to the facility on [DATE] with intact cognition and was their own responsible party. A review of an admission note entered into the record by Nurse 'A' on [DATE] read, .Resident requested status for DNR (Do Not Resuscitate, or no Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation) and was given DNR paperwork but was educated that she would remain a CPR (Full Code) until she speaks with social worker and Consent to Treat signed, dated and recorded . A review of R138's orders revealed an order dated [DATE] that indicated they were a full code. The order was discontinued on [DATE] and an order for DNR was entered on [DATE]. R139 On [DATE]…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2024-04-17 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — widespread
  Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide readily accessible Medication Regimen Review (MMR) documentation within the Electronic Medical Record (EMR) to ensure the residents condition, care, and services were obtainable by all disciplines for five residents (R17, R27, R33, R150, R15, R251) of five reviewed for unnecessary medications. Findings include: On 4/15/24, The following Residents (R17, R27, R33, R150, R15) were selected for an unnecessary medication review investigation and included evaluation of the facilities MMR process, documentation, and pharmacy recommendations. On 4/16/24, The EMR was reviewed for R17, R27, R33, R150, and R15, and MMR documentation was not readily accessible. The Director of Nursing (DON) was questioned how to obtain the MMR within the EMR and confirmed MMR documentation is not located in EMR and uploaded into a different software program. The DON indicated to obtain the MMR medical records, the names of the residents would have to be disclosed and forwarded and retrieved by designated staff members. R251 On 04/15/24 at 1:36…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-04-17 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY R20 On 4/15/24 at 9:57 AM, R20 was observed sitting in a wheelchair, upon entering the room there was no precaution sign on the resident's door. The Resident was observed to have a foley catheter with a collection bag hanging from the underside of the wheelchair. On 4/15/24 at approximately 11 AM, there was no EBP documentation on their door. A review of R20's clinical record revealed the resident was initially admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included: urinary tract infection, sepsis and kidney failure. A review of Resident Progress Notes from 3/4/24 at 9:29 PM revealed that the resident had a foley catheter in place at that time. A review of R20's order history revealed an order for Enhanced Barrier Precautions entered on 4/15/24 at 3:41 PM which read in part Staff to use enhanced barrier precautions, wearing a gown and gloves at minimum during high-contact care activities. A review of the facility Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) policy stated EBP will be in place during high-contact care activities…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-04-17 · tag F0582 — isolated
  Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide a Skilled Nursing Facility Advanced Beneficiary Notice (SNFABN) detailing estimated charges of continued services for three residents (R26, R7, and R33) out of three sampled residents reviewed for SNF Beneficiary Protection Notification. Findings include: On 4/15/24 at approximately 3:47 PM, the facility provided a completed resident SNF Beneficiary Protection Notification Review form. The form contained the 88 residents who were discharged from Medicare covered part A stay (10/16/24-4/12/24) with benefit days remaining who either discharged from the facility or decided to remain. The following residents were selected for review to determine when they were notified of their discontinuance of service coverage and rights to proceed: 1. R7: discharged from the facility on 4/3/24. 2. R26: Date of discharge 3/4/24 (remained in the facility). 3. R33: Date of discharge: [DATE] (remained at the facility). On 4/16/24 at approximately 1:15 PM, an…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-04-17 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure a dependent resident was provided unwanted facial hair removal for one (R39) of three residents reviewed for Activities of Daily Living (ADL). Findings include: On 4/15/24 at approximately 10:00 AM, R39 was observed lying in bed with long facial hair (approximately ½ inch) on their chin. The resident was asked about ADL care provided by facility staff including facial hair removal. R39 reported that they were receiving bed baths only and had not had their hair removed in a long time. R39 stated that they would like it removed. On 4/16/24 at approximately 8:30 AM, R39 was observed in their room. The resident still had long chin hair and again reported that they would like them removed. A review of R39's clinical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included: bacteremia (bacteria in the blood stream), pneumonia and respiratory failure. A review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to TRILOGY HEALTH SERVICES — 123 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

6 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $1.9M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 18% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in MI