Novi Lakes Health Campus

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

64.5% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 352 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 71.1% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 159 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.63 therapist hours per resident per day in 2025Q4 — more than 90% of the 13,714 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 18% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 14% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 54 beds and averages 50.8 residents a day — about 94% occupied, or roughly 3 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.18 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 1.12 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.76 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.79 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.48 on weekdays — 15% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.92 to 0.37 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 39% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

24 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 13 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · Gdisputed · IDR2026-07-29 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intake: 3073158.Based on interviews and record reviews the facility failed to timely implement appropriate treatment and interventions for pressure wounds and failed to identify and timely respond to the worsening of the wound for one (R201) of one resident reviewed for wounds. This resulted in the prompting of the family to insist on the transfer of the resident to a higher level of care and subsequently required multiple debridements and multiple Intravenous antibiotics therapy to treat the infected decubitus ulcer with an associated abscess and fat necrosis of the buttock wound and pain.Findings include:A review of a complaint submitted to the State Agency (SA) reported concerns of the facility failure to promptly treat a wound infection and transferring to a higher level of care timely.A review of the medical record revealed R201 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and transferred to the hospital two weeks later on 5/30/26. R201 was admitted with diagnoses that included:…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-07-29 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
  Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intake: 3072746.Based on interview and record reviews the facility failed to follow current standards of practice for obtaining weights for one (R202) of one resident reviewed for Nutritional concerns. Findings include:A review of a complaint submitted to the State Agency (SA) noted concerns of the resident's enteral pump malfunctioning, enteral feeding to have not been provided as ordered and staff failing to promptly correct the issue.A review of the medical record revealed R202 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and discharged on 7/20/26, with diagnoses that included: cerebral infarction (stroke), dysphagia (swallowing difficulties) and severe protein-calorie malnutrition. R202 required staff assistance for Activities of Daily Living (ADLs).A review of the weights obtained for R202 revealed one documented weight dated 7/5/26 AT 12:59 pm at 167 lbs. (pounds).There were no other weights obtained nor documented in the medical record.A review of a Nurse Practitioner (NP) note dated…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-07-08 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement key elements of an effective water management plan for reducing the risk of legionella and other opportunistic pathogens of premise plumbing (OPPP), resulting in the potential for increased risk of respiratory infection among all residents in the facility . Findings include:On 7/7/2026 at 9:45 AM reviewed Water Management Program (WMP) documents with the Director of Plant Operations (DPO) N. Review of the document titled Legionella Water Management Plan (undated, 6 pages) identified the Water Management Team (WMT) as: Executive Director, Director of Plant Operations, Director of Health Services, and Director of Environmental Services. When asked about how the WMT functions, DPO N indicated that they do not meet regularly and have not met in the past year. The current WMP has not been reviewed/updated annually by the WMT.The WMP documents did not include a facility risk assessment to identify areas where Legionella and other opportunistic waterborne pathogens could grow and spread. The WMP did not include…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-07-08 · tag F0554 — pattern
  Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to determine self-administration of medications was safe and appropriate for three (R5, R46, R30) of four observed with medications at the bedside. Findings Include. R46 On 7/6/26 at 10:11AM, R46's bedside table was observed revealing two tubes of Vitamin A&D ointment (moisture barrier topical medication) and one tube of Calmoseptine (zinc and menthol topical medication). Record review of R46's Medication Administration Record (MAR) did not indicate Vitamin A&D and Calmospetine was ordered and no prescriber's order to self-administer. On 7/7/2026 at 8:11AM, During medication administration for R11, one tube of Vitamin A&D ointment was observed on the bedside table. Record review of R11's MAR did not indicate Vitamin A&D was ordered and no prescriber's order to self-administer. On 7/7/26 at 12:21 PM, R46 was interviewed with their daughter at bedside. When inquired about having Vitamin A&D ointment and Calmoseptine, R46 could not explain the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-07-08 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure medications were stored safely, securely, and properly, in one of two medication administration carts, two of two treatment carts, and one of one medication room observed for medication storage and labeling. Findings include:On 7/7/26 at 7:56 AM, the [NAME] Trail treatment cart was observed unlocked, the top drawer revealed resident treatment medications.On 7/7/26 at 8:16 AM, the [NAME] Trail medication cart was observed for medication storage with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) C and revealed a bottle of lubricating eye drop medication and a nasal spray medication with no patient identifiers. LPN C acknowledged they did not know who they were prescribed to and commented they would have to find out. The second drawer revealed a round orange colored pill tablet unpackaged. The third drawer was observed with two round white colored pills unpackaged.On 7/7/26 at 8:56 AM, the Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) E provided access to the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-07-08 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide a clean, comfortable, homelike environment for one [R69] of two residents reviewed for environment. Findings include:On 7/6/26 at 9:27 AM, R69 was observed sitting in a wheelchair in their room. R69 was asked if they had any concerns about the facility. R69 explained on Saturday [7/4/26] they were taking a shower in the bathroom when they had an accident [bowel movement]. the aide just put a towel over it. on Sunday [7/5/26] they told Licensed Practical Nurse [LPN] 'L' about the bathroom floor not being cleaned up and he sent three people in to clean it, but it still was not clean. Observation of the floor in R69's bathroom between the toilet and the shower area revealed multiple spots of brown material, some approximately the size of a quarter, some approximately the size of a dime and some dot like. An area of grout between the tiles that had the appearance of a brown colored liquid dried on the grout. When told of the observation of the bathroom floor, R69 explained they kept a very clean, tidy…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-07-08 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolated
  Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure tube feeding automatic water flush was administered per the physician order for one [R70] of one resident reviewed for tube feeding. Findings include:On 7/6/26 at 9:45 AM, R70 was observed lying in bed. A tube feeding pole was observed next to R70's bed. Two bags were hanging from the top of the pole, one contained the tube feeding formula and one contained water. The tube feeding pump indicated it was delivering the formula. The bag containing the water for automatic flush appeared to be full, it was at the 1000 milliliters [ml] mark at the top of the bag. Upon further observation, the pump was not set for automatic water flush, the settings were blank. R70 was asked if they were able to eat or drink food or water in addition to their tube feeding. R70 explained they only received tube feedings, they did not eat or drink any food or water.Review of the clinical record revealed R70 was admitted into the facility on 7/3/26 with diagnoses that included: stroke, dysphagia [difficulty swallowing] and lung…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-07-08 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
  Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure a resident's medical record was accurate and complete for one (R73) of one resident reviewed for accurate resident records. Findings include:On 7/6/26 at approximately 10:39 AM, R73 was observed lying in bed. The resident was alert but had difficulty answering questions asked due to a language barrier. The resident's family member was present and noted that the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] following a fall at home.A review of R73's electronic medical record was conducted utilizing the Quick Guide for Surveyor form. The form noted that to obtain resident's diagnoses the Surveyor should review the residents face sheet by scrolling to current IDC-10 (international classification of diseases). An attempt was made to obtain R73's diagnoses via their face sheet, but no diagnoses were noted.Continued review of R73's clinical record revealed, in part the following:7/7/26 (9:24 AM): Resident admitted with dx (diagnosis) of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-06-18 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  This citation pertains to intake #MI00153247. Based on interview and record review the facility failed to administer blood pressure medications per physician's orders for one resident, (R901) of one resident reviewed for medication administration. Findings include: On 6/18/25 at 8:30 AM, a review of R901's closed clinical record revealed they re-admitted to the facility after a hospital stay on 5/7/25 with diagnoses that included: chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, hypertensive heart disease with heart failure, chronic kidney disease, diabetes, and anxiety disorder. A review of R901's physician's orders and medication administration record (MAR) for May 2025 was conducted and revealed an order for metoprolol (a blood pressure medication) 25 milligrams to be given daily between 6 AM and 10 AM. The order contained, Special Instructions that read, HOLD FOR SBP (systolic blood pressure) LESS THAN 110 OR HR (heart rate) LESS THAN 60. R901's MAR indicated indicated the medication had been given on 5/8/25 with a documented blood pressure of 101/56, and on 5/11/25 with a documented…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-05-08 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to store food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. This deficient practice has the potential to result in food borne illness among all residents that consume food from the kitchen. Findings include: On 5/6/25 during an initial observation of the kitchen between 7:10 AM-7:40 AM, the following items were observed with the Dining Services Assistant (Staff 'B'): The top loading/reach-in ice cream cooler did not have an internal thermometer and had visible thick build-up of ice around the top perimeter of the inside wall (near the top sliding doors about 8 inches in depth. Four of the six large cardboard containers of ice cream had a sticker with a use by date of 6/4, but the lids were not fitted properly and exposed the ice cream which was observed to have a darker colored top layer of ice cream covering. Staff 'B' reported the ice cream freezer was not hooked up to their electronic temperature monitoring via the iPad as the other walk-in/reach-in coolers and freezers were and should…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-05-08 · tag F0711 — pattern
  Ensure the resident's doctor reviews the resident's care, writes, signs and dates progress notes and orders, at each required visit.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure Physician/Physician Extender progress notes were entered into the clinical record in a timely manner for four residents (R#'s 13, 29, 138, and 37 ) of four resident's reviewed for Physician/Physician Extender progress notes. Findings include: R13 On 5/7/25 at 10:00 AM, a review of R13's clinical record revealed a note entered into the record by Nurse Practitioner (NP) 'I' on 3/30/25 for an acute care visit for pain management that occurred on 2/26/25. R29 On 5/7/25 at 10:08 AM, a review of R29's clinical record revealed the following: A note entered into the record by NP 'I' on 3/28/25 for an acute care visit that occurred on 2/25/25. A note entered into the record by NP 'I' on 2/19/25 for an acute care visit that occurred on 1/29/25. A note entered into the record by NP 'I' on 2/4/25 for an acute care visit that occurred on 1/13/25. R138 On 5/7/25 at 9:10 AM, a review of R138's clinical record revealed they admitted to the facility on [DATE]…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

“Disputed” is CMS’s own flag, not our reading: the CMS deficiency file records whether the home has formally contested a citation, and we reproduce that. IDR is Informal Dispute Resolution, run by the state survey agency that wrote the citation; IIDR is Independent Informal Dispute Resolution, a separate process before an outside entity, available when CMS has proposed a civil money penalty. They are different processes and we mark them differently. Two things to hold at once. A disputed citation is still a citation — it was written by a surveyor, it stands on the record unless and until it is changed, and we neither hide it nor discount it. And we cannot tell you how the dispute came out: CMS publishes that a citation is under dispute, not the outcome, so a tag marked here may since have been upheld, reduced, or deleted, and an unmarked tag may have been disputed and resolved before this file was cut. Ask the home what it disputed and why — it is entitled to tell you, and the answer is often the most informative thing on this page.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to TRILOGY HEALTH SERVICES — 127 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

6 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $1.9M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 18% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in MI