The Willows At Okemos

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

65.8% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 143 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 53.5% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 71 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.55 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 85% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 12% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 68 beds and averages 61.5 residents a day — about 90% occupied, or roughly 6 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.99 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 1.38 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.98 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.72 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.09 on weekdays — 9% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.39 to 1.34 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 33% is below the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

22 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 11 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · G2025-05-07 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This Citation Pertains to Intake Number MI00152440. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure adequate supervision, implementation of meaningful and resident-centered care plan interventions, and staff awareness of planned interventions for fall prevention for two residents (Resident #701 and Resident #704) of three residents reviewed, resulting in Residents with a known risk of falls experiencing falls with injury, including a fracture, necessitating emergency medical treatment and unnecessary pain and discomfort. Findings include: Review of intake documentation revealed Resident #701 fell out of their bed on 4/19/25. Per the intake, the Resident was then made to sit in a chair in the hallway so that staff could keep an eye on them and proceeded to have a second fall at appropriately 4:15 AM on 4/20/25 which resulted in the Resident having an open laceration on their head, which required transfer to the hospital for treatment and sutures in the Emergency Department (ED). Resident #701:…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2026-04-16 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to effectively clean and maintain food service equipment affecting 67 residents who consume food, resulting in the increased likelihood for cross-contamination and bacterial harborage.Findings include:On 04/14/2026 at 8:52 A.M., An initial tour of the food service was conducted with Director of Food Services (DFS) M. The following items were noted:Dry Storage Room: The return air exhaust ventilation grill was observed heavily soiled with accumulated and encrusted dust/dirt deposits. (DFS) M indicated he would have maintenance thoroughly clean the soiled ventilation grill as soon as possible.The 2022 FDA Model Food Code section 6-501.14 states: (A) Intake and exhaust air ducts shall be cleaned and filters changed so they are not a source of contamination by dust, dirt, and other materials. (B) If vented to the outside, ventilation systems may not create a public health HAZARD or nuisance or unLAWful discharge.Food splash residue was observed on the overhead light assembly and ceiling surfaces, adjacent to the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-16 · tag F0636 — isolated
  Assess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to complete a comprehensive assessment timely for three Residents (#12, #58, #68) of seventeen residents reviewed for comprehensive assessments.Findings Included: R12: Review of the medical record reflected R12 admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included Alzheimer's and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). The Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 3/4/26, reflected R12 scored four out of 15 (severe cognitive impairment) on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS-a cognitive screening tool). On 04/15/2026 at 4:39 PM, R12 was observed seated in his wheelchair, in the dining room. As of 4/16/26, the status of R12's Annual MDS, with an ARD of 3/4/26, was Finalized. Section V (Care Area Assessment (CAA) Summary) of the MDS was signed on 4/16/26. In an interview on 04/16/2026 at 9:40 AM, MDS Nurse K stated Section Z of R12's Annual MDS was signed timely. According to MDS Nurse K, work was done…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-16 · tag F0638 — isolated
  Assure that each resident’s assessment is updated at least once every 3 months.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to complete a quarterly assessment for three Residents (#49, #51, #61) of seventeen residents reviewed for comprehensive assessments.Findings Included:Resident #49 (R49) Review of the medical record revealed that R49 was admitted to the facility 05/08/2019 with diagnoses that included heart failure, chronic kidney disease, type 2 diabetes, atrial fibrillation, hyperlipidemia (high fat content in blood), epilepsy (neurological disorder with seizures), chronic pain, osteoarthritis (degenerative joint disease), osteoporosis (bone weaking), obesity, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Review of R49's Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 11/25/2025, revealed that R49 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of 9 (moderate cognitive impairment) out of 15. Review of R49's medical record revealed that the last Minimum Data Set (MDS) was completed with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 11/25/25.20 During an…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-16 · tag F0641 — isolated
  Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to accurately code the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for one (R12) of 17 reviewed. Findings include:Review of the medical record reflected R12 admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included Alzheimer's and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). The Annual MDS, with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 3/4/26, reflected R12 scored four out of 15 (severe cognitive impairment) on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS-a cognitive screening tool) and was coded as not having any applicable oral dental concerns. Broken or loosely fitting full or partial denture and no natural teeth or tooth fragment(s) (edentulous) were listed as coding options. On 04/14/2026 at 9:26 AM, R12 was observed seated in a wheelchair, in his room. R12 reported having dentures, but he had not seen them in a few months and did not know what happened to them. In an interview on 04/15/2026 at 11:40 AM, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) N…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-16 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
  Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to revise the Care Plan for one (R9) of 17 reviewed. Findings include: Review of the medical record reflected R9 admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included hemiplegia and hemiparesis (paralysis/muscle weakness on one side of the body) following cerebral infarction (stroke), affecting the left non-dominant side. The Significant Change in Status Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 1/22/26, reflected R9 scored eight out of 15 (moderate cognitive impairment) on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS-a cognitive screening tool). On 04/14/2026 at 2:44 PM, R9 was observed lying in bed. In an interview on 04/15/2026 at 5:11 PM, Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) R reported R9 transferred via hoyer lift (mechanical lift that uses a sling to lift a person) and two-person assist. CNA R stated transfer status was included in the Care Plan. R9's Care Plan reflected an intervention, dated 11/9/21, for pivot…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-16 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
  Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to implement pharmacy recommendations for one resident (#36) of five residents reviewed for pharmacy services.Findings Included:Resident #36 (R36)Review of the medical record revealed that R36 was admitted to the facility 11/04/2021 with diagnoses that included right ulna fracture, dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), depression, insomnia, anxiety, stroke, type 2 diabetes, hypertension, and pain. Review of the most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 02/01/2026 revealed that R36 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of 07 (severe cognitive impairment) out of 15.On 04/14/2026 at 08:57 a.m. during observation R39 was observed lying in bed. R39 was pleasant during interview and expressed no concerns.Review of R36's medical record revealed a Pharmacist Drug Regimen Review, dated 07/29/2025, which stated Resident is receiving the statin: Atrovastatin. Please consider adding a fasting lipid panel with next lab draw and annually. The same document revealed the Response to…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-16 · tag F0791 — failed to provide routine dental services — isolated
  Provide or obtain dental services for each resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a timely dental services referral for one (R54) of two reviewed. Findings include: Review of the medical record reflected R54 admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction (stroke) affecting left non-dominant side and vascular dementia. The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 2/26/26, reflected R54 scored three out of 15 (severe cognitive impairment) on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS-a cognitive screening tool). According to the medical record, R54 had a Medicaid payer source.On 04/14/2026 at 1:36 PM, R54 was observed seated in a wheelchair, in her room. She reported she had seen the dentist for an issue with a tooth on the bottom, left side of her mouth. She reported she was supposed to do a follow-up but had not heard anything about it yet. A Dental consult for 9/12/25 reflected, .Patient complains of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-07 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This Citation Pertains to Intake Number MI00152440. Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure Activities of Daily Living (ADL) and hygiene care were provided to one resident (Resident #704) of three residents reviewed. Findings include: Resident #704: On 5/6/25 at 12:15 PM, Resident #704 was observed sitting in a wheelchair at a table in the dining room of the facility. The Resident's fingernails were long. When asked questions, the Resident made eye contact but did not provide verbal responses. Record review revealed Resident #704 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses which included Alzheimer's disease, dementia with other behavioral disturbance, anxiety, right foot hallux rigidus (limited movement, stiffness, pain in the big toe joint), falls, and displaced fracture of the right and left femurs with surgical repair. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 4/15/25, revealed the Resident was severely…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-01-29 · tag F0641 — pattern
  Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Resident #34 (R34) Review of the Face Sheet and Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 10/4/24, reflected R34 was a [AGE] year old male admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included hypertension (high blood pressure), malnutrition and depression. The MDS reflected R34 had a BIM (assessment tool) score of 10 which indicated his ability to make daily decisions was moderately impaired. During an observation and interview on 1/27/25 at 11:45 AM, R34 was in room sitting in wheelchair with some difficulty answering questions. R34 family was present and reported was currently receiving hospice services. Review of R34's Physician Orders, dated 9/26/24, reflected an order for Hospice services. Review of R34's Significant Change MDS, dated [DATE], reflected no evidence that resident 34 was on Hospice services. During an interview on 1/28/25 at 4:44 PM, MDS staff C reported had been in position about five months and received support from regional support staff. MDS C reported…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-01-29 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure appropriate storage of medications, including narcotics in 2 of 5 medication carts, resulting in the potential for misuse, and medication administration errors. Findings include: During an observation on 1/28/25 at 9:15 AM, 100 hall medication cart was unlocked with no staff present. Continued observation with two non-nurse staff members passing medication cart. Observed nurse staff exit resident room and return to medication cart and lock cart at 9:18 a.m. prior to exiting hall 100. Review of the 100 hall medication cart on 1/28/25 at 11:22 AM, Registered Nurse (RN) K unlocked 100 hall medication cart, revealed a unlabeled medication cup with at least 2 unidentified pills in the top drawer. RN K grabbed the cup of medications and reported was resident 11:00 am medications and needed to administer medications now, locked medication cart and entered resident room [ROOM NUMBER]. This surveyor heard RN K tell resident she had her Norco…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to TRILOGY HEALTH SERVICES — 123 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

6 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $1.5M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 15% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in MI